Reviewer 1: Laura Cecilia De Luca, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria.
(INTA). Argentina
Reviewer 2: Hanníbal Brito, ESPOCH, Ecuador
This form is designed to summarize the manuscript peer review that you have completed and to ensure that you have considered all appropriate criteria in your review. Your review should provide a clear statement, to the authors and editors, of the modifications necessary before the paper can be published or the specific reasons for rejection.
Please respond within the appointed time so that we can give the authors timely responses and feedback.
NOTE: ESJ promotes peer review procedure based on scientific validity and technical quality of the paper (not perceived the impact). You are also not required to do
proofreading of the paper. It could be recommended as part of the revision.
ESJ editorial office would like to express its special gratitude for your time and efforts. Our editorial team is a substantial reason that stands ESJ out from the crowd!
Reviewer Name: DE LUCA LAURA
University/Country: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. (INTA). Argentina Date Manuscript Received: 11 de mayo Date Review Report Submitted: 18 de mayo Manuscript Title: Análisis de la caracterización físico-química y microbiológica de las Lagunas del Municipio de Escárcega, Campeche, México
Analysis of the physical-chemical and microbiological characterization of the Lagoons of the Municipality of Escárcega, Campeche, México
ESJ Manuscript Number: 58.05.2021
You agree your name is revealed to the author of the paper: Yes
You approve, your name as a reviewer of this paper, is available in the “review history” of the paper: Yes You approve, this review report is available in the “review history” of the paper: Yes
Evaluation Criteria:
Please give each evaluation item a numeric rating on a 5-point scale, along with a thorough explanation for each point rating.
Questions
Rating Result [Poor] 1-5 [Excellent]
1. The title is clear and it is adequate to the content of the
article. 3
Probablemente “Caracterización y análisis de las variables fisico-químicas y microbiológicas dela laguna del municipio de Escárcega, Campeche, México” sea gramaticalmente mas adecuado.
5. The results are clear and do not contain errors. 4 (Please insert your comments)
Los Resultados no presentan errors
6. The conclusions or summary are accurate and
supported by the content. 3
(Please insert your comments)
Sugiero rehacer el resumen, ya que es lo que permite a los lectores interesarse – o no- por la lectura complete del artícolo. En este caso, presenta algunas
falencias. Se adjuntan observaciones y propuestas de modificación en el texto bajo control de cambio.
7. The references are comprehensive and appropriate. 4 (Please insert your comments)
Faltan referencias bibliográficas
Overall Recommendation
(mark an X with your recommendation)：Accepted, no revision needed
Accepted, minor revision needed X
Return for major revision and resubmission Reject
Comments and Suggestions to the Author(s):
Realicé las sugerencias en el texto que adjunto. Creo que deben trabajar un poco mas el resumen, incluso las palabras clave, las cuales deben significar algo para los lectores de otras partes del mundo.
En cuanto a las conclusiones y análisis de Resultados deben reveer la propuesta de pasteurización como manera definitiva de saneamiento. Esto no es asi.
This form is designed to summarize the manuscript peer review that you have completed and to ensure that you have considered all appropriate criteria in your review. Your review should provide a clear statement, to the authors and editors, of the modifications necessary before the paper can be published or the specific reasons for rejection.
Please respond within the appointed time so that we can give the authors timely responses and feedback.
NOTE: ESJ promotes peer review procedure based on scientific validity and technical quality of the paper (not perceived the impact). You are also not required to do
proofreading of the paper. It could be recommended as part of the revision.
ESJ editorial office would like to express its special gratitude for your time and efforts. Our editorial team is a substantial reason that stands ESJ out from the crowd!
Reviewer Name: HANNÍBAL BRITO University/Country: ESPOCH/ECUADOR
Date Manuscript Received:2021/05/10 Date Review Report Submitted: 2021/05/21 Manuscript Title: Analysis of the physical-chemical and microbiological characterization of the Lagoons of the Municipality of Escárcega, Campeche, México
ESJ Manuscript Number: 58.05.2021
You agree your name is revealed to the author of the paper: Yes/No
You approve, your name as a reviewer of this paper, is available in the “review history” of the paper: Yes/No You approve, this review report is available in the “review history” of the paper: Yes/No
Evaluation Criteria:
Please give each evaluation item a numeric rating on a 5-point scale, along with a thorough explanation for each point rating.
Questions
Rating Result [Poor] 1-5 [Excellent]
1. The title is clear and it is adequate to the content of the
article. 4
Analysis of the physical-chemical and microbiological characterization of the Lagoons of the Municipality of Escárcega, Campeche, México
I suggest adjusting the theme to:
Physical-chemical and microbiological characterization of the water of the Lagoons of the Municipality of Escárcega, Campeche, Mexico.
To be related to the development of the manuscript.
according to the established standard must be located in the same results table.
6. The conclusions or summary are accurate and
supported by the content. 4
Must be more specific when writing conclusions
7. The references are comprehensive and appropriate.
They comply with the provisions of the standard
Overall Recommendation
(mark an X with your recommendation) Accepted, no revision neededAccepted, minor revision needed X
Return for major revision and resubmission Reject
Comments and Suggestions to the Author(s):
Consider the requested suggestions.
