A Comprehensive Survey of Multihop Wireless Network

(1)

International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering

Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 9, Issue 10, October 2019)

53

A Comprehensive Survey of Multihop Wireless Network

Amrita Badgujar

1

, Prof. Gaurav Nayak

2

, Prof. Manoj Kumar

3

1,2,3

Computer Science and Engineering, LNCTS, RGPV, Bhopal, India

Abstract—Wireless sensor networks (WSN), an element of pervasive computing, are presently being used on a large scale to monitor real-time environmental status. Most tactical wireless networks are operating in a hostile environment, in which normal network operation cannot be easily achieved. Wireless data networks have spread between home users and companies in an increasing fashion. The main reason behind this fast adaptation is due to the nature of wireless networks where it provides the flexibility and freedom that wired networks lack. The increasing of bandwidth capabilities has inspired people to think seriously about replacing wired networks with wireless networks especially in places where it is hard or expensive to have wired networks. Each day, new arduous projects and applications utilizing mobile devices are evolving, with a prime motive to deploy wireless multi-hop networks into the real world. As these networks are, in general, deployed in extreme environmental conditions their performance evaluation is a matter of great concern and demands rigorous analysis. Several models, simulators, testbeds and visualization tools have evolved in the last two decades for analyzing the characteristics of these wireless multi-hop networks. In this paper, first we discuss about the WSN and its life cycle. Then, we discuss the associated challenges in wireless multi-hop network for P2P applications. Besides, we also discuss challenges in switching routing protocols in wireless mesh network and various literature have provided regarding work has been already done in the field of wireless multi-hop network.

Keywords— MHWN, Wireless sensor network, Multihop networks, MANET, Peer-to-Peer.

I. INTRODUCTION

As wireless communication technologies (WCT) has been quickly growing like convenient consumption, less cost and flexible formation also helped in development of WN are accepted. Integrated with a wide variety of computing paradigms and modern network methods, many of which enable vital applications like WCT,

strategic communications, intelligent transportation

systems, and smart grids. In actual, the wireless & mobile network examine developed into an indispensable component of day to day life activities. This is an important structure that brings together the world. MHWN has concentrated on academic & industry areas in current years as one of the frameworks to make connections to universal networks across various network situations.

[image:1.612.340.558.304.432.2]

In various application circumstances, several MHWN examples have been advanced in various wireless networking criteria. Typical MHWN Example is Wireless Ad Hoc Network (WAHN). A WAHN typically consists of a node that communicates with each other throughout several wireless hopes, collaboratively forward nodes with which the traffic, such as pre- existing structure & cables or access points.

Fig. 1: Wireless Multi-hop Network

Another example for MHWN is Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) which is group of mobile hosts. Temporary paths are set up to send mobile nodes & packets in the cell, while it has no pre accessible structure network connection [1].

II. WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK (WSN)

WSN is a great system composed with many predetermined occupation, such as processing, sensing etc. that meet many application necessities. Further sensor nodes (SN), one or more base stations (BS) or sink nodes are all connected to network. Wireless mesh networks (WMN) energetically self prearranged and automatically adjusted. Nodes create Ad Hoc Network on the network repeatedly and preserve mesh linkage. To maximize coverage of WMN, little multihop wireless mesh networks (MHWMN) further including cellular phones, laptops, handheld devices & access points linked to Internet.

(2)

54 If information is transmitted or received data utilizing radio connection beneath structural low network. The structural low network has two main kinds: structured & unstructured.

Few SN are prearranged in preplanned with the structured WSN. There are very less network organization and maintenance costs is also less. An unstructured WSN is a huge group SN organizes in sensor area, which can make it complicated to manage the connectivity & discover breakdown of the nodes. WSN presents various technological challenges in information procedure, communication, collaboration signal, querying, routing, tasking & security.

In particular, the WSN life cycle has four stages. (i) Controlling stage (ii) Monitoring stage (iii) Deploying stage (iv) Planning stage. In this case, the setup is omitted due to SN is recurrently reprocessed. With consumption structure, sensor nodes are constantly sent to wireless linkage excellence & route to base. The planning stages are frequently examination of deploying location & choose right target destinations so that the sensors can be deployed to achieve the desired goal.

CONTROLLING

MOINTERING

DEPLOYING

[image:2.612.100.239.407.523.2]

PLANNING

Fig. 2. Wireless sensor network life cycle

In monitoring stage, user interest, especially network sensors, concentrate on standards read via network sensors. As controlling stage, application utilized manages WSN via transferring a notification to the sensor network [2].

III. CHALLENGES IN WIRELESS MULTI-HOP NETWORKS

FOR P2P APPLICATIONS

Researchers in wireless multimedia networks attract the applications of the P2P (peer-to-peer) system. WMHN have no fixed infrastructure & different restrictions. So there are more challenges when evaluated to P2P networks. We have divided the three main groups of challenges: equipment allied, user allied, and protocol allied. P2P applications on WMHN follow main challenges.

A. Bandwidth Constraint

P2P networks are considered for wired networks & have rich bandwidth. But this is not true for the WMHN. The nodes contribute in P2P overlay are of inadequate bandwidth capabilities. There will be different bandwidth capabilities for different nodes, and the communications link will be enabled. P2P focused mostly on downloading apps & files. Therefore, P2P applications involve high bandwidth for even P2P applications. Therefore, providing effective P2P applications on WMHN is a challenge. We save this challenge in the device component category.

B. Routing Scope

Routing system on traditional P2P networks is easy on IP structured & nodes in P2P networks. But in WMHN, nodes are likely to be accessed more than one hop or more than one hop. In the future, we need to keep the route established in the past. For multiple targets to a goal, the minimum direction is preferred for proficient routing reason. Diverse routing protocols (RP) use WMN and MANET to route the protocols to P2P applications. These work another way in dissimilar network environments. Therefore, the collection of surroundings routing protocols is quite significant. Execute proficient RP over WMHN is a challenge.

C. Network Stability

The P2P network unstable when the WMHN nodes are join and leave. Furthermore, mobility of nodes, the restricted battery power and the network is unbalanced. DHT is structurally compulsory on overlay structural P2P networks and helps to prevent DHT node drawbacks. DHT considered protocols consist of a routing table modernize to conquer condition, while most of these include repairs. When using DHT-based protocols in WMHN, network resolutions are a main problem.

D. Security Mechanism

Security problem is main dispute in P2P networks. The central server does not have to loop after node interactions, so the security system in the P2P application on WMHN is complicated to execute. Additionally, due to an unknown and decentralization in P2P applications on WMHN and auto-organizational of nodes, it is extremely complicated to execute a privacy method. The frequent churn of nodes and mobility challenge in the privacy method. The Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) requires PK to utilize the traditional security system to ensure

authenticity. PKI is considered on asymmetric

(3)

55

IV. LITERATURE SURVEY

D. SreeArthi et al. [2017] The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) works consistently on the consistent Stream transfer Protocol well in Wired Network contrast to MHWN. MHWN have many features, such as dynamic self-configuring and self-healing vigor. TCP in the MHWN is a challenging task. Encryption nodes and regular handoff to its performance. Under the MHWN

Simulation Environment, Drop, TCP's Bandwidth

Examination & Delay considered congestion organize algorithm have been experienced. [4]

Isamu Shimada et al. [2017] On ad-hoc networks, data messages (DM) pass from starting place wireless node (WN) to intermediary WN with a WN transmit direction to a target location. Data intercepts go ahead with each intermediate wireless node with its MHWN. So wireless signal (WS) with DM is transmitted utilizing an antenna in an Omni direction & cannot be difficult to eavesdropper WN against WS to obtain DM. Few research suggests broadcasting a sound wireless signal along with DM wireless signal is useful for disrupting overheating. The antennas in the direction of special signal processing or higher computing power are required. MHWN have a large amount of WN and minute, low-priced WN which is compulsory for building networks without such devices. This thesis suggests a narrative system to hide through the wireless nodes eavesdropper through a routing protocol. Each default wireless node 1-hop and 2-hop neighborhood wireless nodes coordinate sound signal transmissions suggests a data message transmission protocol. [5]

T .R. V edhavathy et al. [2014] On MHWN, mobile nodes are routed to reload package of another nodes. But the natural nodes do not protect the package of other nodes and inadequate possessions. Significantly affects network output & presentation. Credits are utilized to promote collaboration of self-employed in inducement protocols. However, accessible protocols utilize the heavyweight PK cryptographic functions to privacy expense. In this paper, Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) & hashing functions are put forth by a safe promotion system. The proposed method of method is low in comparison with PK protocols. [6]

Mrs S. Thangam et al. [2009] Wireless networks (WN) are appropriate more accepted amongst commercial & home users around the world. Users look for latest

methods that permit to correspond and use

communications. To this extent, wireless communications play vital role upcoming contact coordination. WN

preliminary advantages when comparing wireless

networks' managing, speed, cheaper alignment, ultimately easy maintenance and upgrading process.

In accumulation to structural mode, Ad Hoc mode for 802.11 also begins. As position of mobile networks changes or the wireless channel is deviating from the situation, these networking capabilities can quickly and easily change. Features needed strong and adaptive communications protocols that may address the flexibility of MHWN. [7]

Lajos Hanzo et al. [2009] MANET offer distinctive communication prospect. It is complicated to offer QoS guarantees for managing applications as its reliable wireless channel, lack of centralized controls, and contradiction between channel access and node mobility. Admission Control (AC) is one of most important factors providing QoS guarantees. Decide whether the application data sessions are permitted without offering more resources than the performance of the AC system for assessing & violating the guarantees provided. Huge sections of AC protocols have been created to address these issues. However, it is possible to write that these

conclusions are broader. Numerous system of

classification of projects available in literature is proposed. Shortcomings in action, response to root breakdown, strengths & weaknesses of every protocol. It exemplifies plan movement in developing AC protocols. Finally, suggestions for future activity are provided [8].

V. CHALLENGES IN SWITCHING ROUTING PROTOCOLS

IN WMNS

Wireless Mesh network (WMN) are portrayed via static wireless transfer nodes giving a dispersed framework to

versatile client nodes. Numerous information

transmissions by means of the getaway node to wired network, however great deals of information transmit among nodes in mesh. Locate sort of important & effective steering convention for WMN is essential. Joining tree considered steering convention with AODV protocol is method for cooperation of two modes [9].

We have to address various particular difficulties to take into account powerfully swap WMN routing examine with other:

(4)

56

2) Renegotiation or Mismatch of Cryptographic Identities: Routing daemons utilize cryptographic characters, for example SAODV, Ariadne or SOLSR may need keys to renegotiate whenever supplanted to one another. Like the first test, this may prompt service going down at a time as nodes probably won't be capable to sign or to encrypt their traffic.

3)State Transfer between Routing Daemons: It just shown previously, it goes for even transaction among various WMN routing implementation. First objective to diminish service going down at a time via exchanging built up state data among diverse daemons & protocols. To replace state data is technically challenging three principle motive. In the 1st position, info generally be

preserved in correspondent form, consequential

necessitate of transform condition data while transition stage.

For example, the protocol execution with many routers is a monolithic character; State transfers among demons needed a apparent range. If a method is scattered across all protocol execution, extremely difficult to extract & incorporate a condition if transition is stopped. The government transmitter between the Routing Daemon must ensure that the transfer of sensitive or personal information is not issued.

[image:4.612.76.254.560.707.2]

4) Coordination of Switching: One important query while transferring a routing service to another. To do this, we consider the network monitoring examine utilizing a group of previously distinct metrics as a critical resolution. However, when will the nodes be utilizing to transform the service used. In accumulation, we require to increase customs that ensure that organization of nodes transformation method is secluded. If potential attackers will fail with switch requirements in the worst possible conditions on the network and the complete network.

Fig. 3. Summary of switching system and component interaction

5)Node Compatibility and Service Proliferation: At last, a synchronous transition among routing services should ensure that all contributing nodes are supported. For this we need a storage that tracks routing and supporting. Based on node compatibility, overall WMN nodes should uniform, so that similar RP modules are supported. [10]

VI. CONCLUSION

The study has provided a comprehensive overview of research work to improve MHWMN based on performance from the spatial reusable perspective. In MHWMN, the MAC Protocol plays an important role in integrating access to the media that is shared through wireless nodes. A MHWMN has appeared as a significant message strategy & is appealing resolution to need for an unlimited world. MHWMN, Wireless Mesh, in short, is the Wireless information Communications Network, where each node is further than the straight radio transmission limit. This paper is about several systems presented to improve the use of channel usage by enhancing.

REFERENCES

[1] Xianglin Wei, Qiping Wang, Tongxiang Wang and Jianhua Fan, “Jammer Localization in Multi-Hop Wireless Network: A Comprehensive Survey”, 1553-877X (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.

Seehttp://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rig hts/ind ex.html for more information.

[2] R.Nithya and N.Mahendran, “A SURVEY: Duty cycle Based Routing and Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE sponsored second international conference on electronics and communication systems(icecs „2015).

[3] Mahendra Singh, Chiranjeev Kumar and Prem Nath, “Challenges and Protocols for P2P applications in Multi-hop Wireless Networks”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC 2018) IEEE Conference Record # 42656; IEEE Xplore ISBN:978-1-5386-3452-3, 2018.

[4] D. SreeArthi, S. Malini, M. Joseph Auxilius Jude and V. C. Diniesh, “Micro level Analysis of TCP Congestion Control

Algorithm in Multi-hop Wireless Networks”, 2017

International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI -2017), Jan. 05 – 07, Coimbatore, INDIA 2017.

[5] Isamu Shimada and Hiroaki Higaki, “Interference of Overhearing by Eavesdropper Nodes for Secure Wireless Multihop Networks”, International Ccdonference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence 2017. [6] T .R. V edhavathy, Dr.M.S.K.Manikanda and N.Indrajith,

(5)

57 [7] Mrs S. Thangam and Dr.E.Kirubakaran, “A Survey on

Cross-Layer Based Approach For Improving TCP Performance In Multi hop Mobile Adhoc Networks”, International Conference on Education Technology and Computer 2009.

[8] Lajos Hanzo II. and Rahim Tafazolli, “Admission Control Schemes for 802.11-Based Multi-Hop Mobile Ad hoc Networks: A Survey ” IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 11, no. 4, fourth quarter 2009.

[9] Ling He, Jun Huang and Feng Yang, “A Noval Hybrid Wireless Routing Protocol for WMNs”, 2010 International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering (ICEIE 2010).