• No results found

The regularized trace formula for a fourth order differential operator given in a finite interval

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The regularized trace formula for a fourth order differential operator given in a finite interval"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

The regularized trace formula for a fourth

order differential operator given in a finite

interval

Serpil Karayel

*

and Yonca Sezer

*Correspondence:

[email protected]

Faculty of Arts and Science, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpas.a, ˙Istanbul, 34220, Turkey

Abstract

In this work, a regularized trace formula for a differential operator of fourth order with bounded operator coefficient is found.

MSC: 47A10; 34L20

Keywords: separable-Hilbert space; self-adjoint operator; kernel operator; spectrum; essential spectrum; resolvent

1 Introduction

Investigations into the regularized trace formulas of scalar differential operators started with the work [] firstly. After that work, regularized trace formulas for several differential operators have been studied in some works as [, ] and []. In [] a formula for the second regularized trace of the problem generated by a Sturm-Liouville operator equation with a spectral parameter dependent boundary condition is found. The list of the works on this subject is given in [] and []. The trace formulas for differential operators with operator coefficient are investigated in the works [–] and []. The boundary conditions in our work are completely different from those in [].

In this work, we find the following regularized trace formula for a self-adjoint differential operatorLof fourth order with bounded operator coefficient:

m=

n=

λmn

m+ 

– 

π

π

trQ(x)dx

= 

trQ(π) –trQ() .

Here{λmn}∞n=are the eigenvalues of the operatorLwhich belong to the interval [(m+) 

Q, (m+)+Q].

1.1 Notation and preliminaries

LetHbe a separable Hilbert space with infinite dimension. Let us consider the operators

LandLin the Hilbert spaceH=L(,π;H) which are formed by the following

differen-tial expressions:

(y) =yıv(x),

(y) =yıv(x) +Q(x)y(x)

(2)

with the same boundary conditionsy() =y() =y(π) =y(π) = . Suppose that the op-erator functionQ(x) in the expression(y) satisfies the following conditions:

(Q) Q(x) :HHis a self-adjoint kernel operator for everyx∈[,π]. Moreover,Q(x)

has second order weak derivative in this interval andQ(i)(x) :HH(i= , ) are

self-adjoint kernel operators for everyx∈[,π]. (Q) Q<.

(Q) There is an orthonormal basis{ϕn}∞n=of the spaceHsuch that

n=

Q(x)ϕn<∞.

(Q) The functionsQ(i)(x)σ

(H)are bounded and measurable in the interval[,π]

(i= , , ).

Hereσ(H) is the space of kernel operators fromHtoHas in []. Moreover, we denote

the norms by·Hand·and inner products by (·,·)Hand (·,·) inHandH, respectively,

and we also denote the sum of eigenvalues of a kernel operatorAbytrA=traceA. Spectrum of the operatorLis the set

σ(L) =

 

,

 

, . . . ,

m+ 

, . . .

.

Every point of this set is an eigenvalue ofLwhich has infinite multiplicity. The

orthonor-mal eigenfunctions corresponding to eigenvalue (m+)are in the form

ψmn(x) =

πsin

m+ 

x·ϕn (n= , , . . .). (.)

2 Some relations between spectrums of operatorsL0andL

LetRλ,be resolvents of the operatorsLandL, respectively. If the operatorQ:H→H

satisfies conditions (Q) and (Q), the following can be proved:

(a) QRλσ(H)for everyλ∈/σ(L).

(b) Spectrum of the operatorLis a subset of the union of pairwise disjoint intervals

Fm=

m+ 

Q,

m+ 

+Q

(m= , , , . . .),σ(L)⊂

m=

Fm.

(c) Each point of the spectrum ofL, different from(m+)inF

mis an isolated

eigenvalue which has finite multiplicity.

(d) The series∞n=[λmn– (m+)](m= , , , . . .) are absolutely convergent where {λmn}∞n=are eigenvalues of the operatorLin the intervalFm.

Letρ(L) be resolvent set of the operatorL;ρ(L) = C\σ(L). SinceQR

λσ(H) for every

λρ(L), from the equation=RλRλQRλwe obtainRλσ(H).

On the other hand, if we consider the series

n=

λmn

m+ 

(3)

are absolutely convergent then we have

trRλ

=

m=

n=

λmnλ

– 

(m+ )–λ

for everyλρ(L) []. If we multiply both sides of this equality withλπiand integrate this equality over the circle|λ|=bp= (p+ )(pN,p≥), then we find

 πi

|λ|=bp

λtrRλ

= 

πi

|λ|=bp λ

p

m=

n=

λmnλ

– 

(m+)λ

+ 

πi

|λ|=bp λ

m=p+

n=

λmnλ

– 

(m+)λ

. (.)

If we consider the relations|λmn|<bp(m= , , , . . . ,p) and|λmn|>bp(m=p+ ,p+ , . . .) forn= , , , . . . , then from (.) we get

 πi

|λ|=bp

λtrRλ

= p

m=

n=

 πi

|λ|=bp

λdλ

λ– (m+)–

 πi

|λ|=bp λdλ λλmn

+

m=p+

n=

 πi

|λ|=bp

λdλ λ– (m+)–

 πi

|λ|=bp λdλ λλmn

= p

m=

n=

m+ 

λmn

. (.)

Moreover, from the formula=RλRλQRλ, we obtain the following equality:

Rλ= –RλQRλ+Rλ

QRλ

QRλ

. (.)

If we put this equality into (.), we have

p

m=

n=

λmn

m+ 

=Mp+Mp+Mp. (.)

Here

Mpj= (–)j

πi

|λ|=bp λtrRλ

QRλ j

(j= , ), (.)

Mp= – πi

|λ|=bp λtr

QRλ

(4)

Theorem . If the operator function Q(x)satisfies condition(Q),then we have

Mpj= (–)jπij

|λ|=bp trQRλ

j

.

Proof It can be shown that the operator functionQR

λis analytic with respect to the norm in the spaceσ(H) in domainρ(L) = C\σ(L) and

trQRλ j

=jtrQRλ

QRλ j–

. (.)

Considering (QR

λ)= (QRλ), we can write the formula (.) as

trQRλ j

=jtrRλ

QRλ j

. (.)

From (.) and (.), we obtain

Mpj= (–)j+

πij

|λ|=bp

λtrQRλ j

.

From here, we find

Mpj= (–)j+

πij

|λ|=bp

trλQRλjQRλjdλ

=(–) j

πij

|λ|=bp trQRλ

j

+(–) j+

πij

|λ|=bp

trλQRλ j

. (.)

It can be easily shown that

trλQRλ j

=trλQRλ j

.

Therefore, we have

|λ|=bp

trλQRλ j

=

|λ|=bp

trλQRλ j

. (.)

The integral on the right-hand side of the last equality can be written as

|λ|=bp

trλQRλj =

|λ|=bp

Imλ≥

trλQRλj +

|λ|=bp

Imλ≤

trλQRλj . (.)

Letεbe a constant satisfying the condition  <ε<bp– (p+). Consider the function

tr[λ(QRλ)j] is analytic in simple connected domains

G={λC:bpε<λ<bp+ε,Imλ> –ε},

(5)

and

λC:|λ|=bp,Imλ≥

G,

λC:|λ|=bp,Imλ≤

G.

From (.) we obtain

|λ|=bp

trλQRλj =tr–bp

QRbpj –trbp(QRbp)

j

+trbp

QRbpj –tr–bp

QRbpj = . (.) From (.), (.) and (.) we find

Mpj= (–)jπij

|λ|=bp

trQRλj .

3 The formula of the regularized trace of the operatorL

In this section, we find a formula for the regularized trace of the operatorL. According to Theorem .,

Mp= –

 πi

|λ|=bp trQR

λ . (.)

Since{ψmn}∞∞m=,n=is an orthonormal basis of the spaceH, from (.) we obtain

Mp= –

 πi

|λ|=bp

m=

n=

QRλψmn,ψmn

= –  πi

|λ|=bp

m=

n=

(Qψmn,ψmn) (m+)λ

=

m=

n=

(Qψmn,ψmn)·  πi

|λ|=bp

λ– (m+). (.)

Considering (m+)<bp= (p+ )formpand (m+)>bp= (p+ )form>p, from formula (.)

Mp=

p

m=

n=

(Qψmn,ψmn)  πi

|λ|=bp

λ– (m+)=

p

m=

n=

(Qψmn,ψmn) (.)

is obtained.

From (.) and (.), we have

Mp=

p

m=

n=

π

Q(x)

πsin

m+ 

x·ϕn,

πsin

m+ 

x·ϕn

H

dx

= 

π

p

m=

n=

π

Q(x)ϕn,ϕn

Hsin

m+ 

x dx

= 

π

p

m=

π

n=

Q(x)ϕn,ϕn

H

(6)

If we consider the formula∞n=(Q(x)ϕn,ϕn)H=trQ(x), then we get

Mp=

p+ 

π

π

trQ(x)dx– 

π

p

m=

π

trQ(x)cos(m+ )x dx. (.)

Lemma . If the operator function Q(x)satisfies conditions(Q)and(Q),then we have

<p–

over the circle|λ|=bp.

Proof Since the operator functionQ(x) satisfies conditions (Q) and (Q), we have

{λmn}∞n=⊂

m+ 

Q,

m+ 

+Q

(m= , , , . . .),

λmn

m+ 

<Q<

 (m= , , , . . . ;n= , , . . .).

If we consider this relation, we get

|λmnλ|= λ

m+ 

λmn

m+ 

λ

m+ 

λmn

m+ 

>|λ|–

m+ 

–

= (p+ )

m+ 

– 

≥(p+ )–

p+ 

–  > 

p+ 

– >p

(.)

formpand

|λmnλ|= m+

 

λ

m+ 

λmn

m+ 

λ

m+ 

λmn

m+ 

–|λ|– 

p+ 

– (p+ )–

 > (p+ )

 >p

(.)

formp+ .

On the other hand, we can write

= max

m=,,...

n=,,...

|λmnλ|–

. (.)

From (.), (.) and (.) we get

<p– |λ|=bp

(7)

Lemma . If the operator function Q(x)satisfies condition(Q),then we have

QRλσ(H)< p

–

n=

Q(x)ϕn

over the circle|λ|=bp.

Proof Let us show that the series∞m=n=QR

λψmnis convergent. Forλ∈/σ(L), we get

m=

n=

QRλψmn

=

m=

n=

m+

 

λ

–

Qψmn

=

m=

n=

m+

 

λ

– π

Q(x)

πsin

m+ 

x·ϕn

H

dx

 

=

π

m=

n=

m+

 

λ

– π

Q(x)ϕnHsin

m+ 

x dx

<

m=

n=

m+

 

λ

– π

Q(x)ϕn

Hdx

=

m=

m+

 

λ

–∞

n=

Q(x)ϕn. (.)

From this relation we obtain

m=

n=

QRλψmn<∞

λ∈/σ(L)

.

On the other hand, since the sequence{ψmn}∞∞m=,n=is an orthonormal basis of the space

H, we get

QRλσ

(H)≤

m=

n=

QRλψmn (.)

[]. From (.) and (.) we obtain

QRλσ(H)≤

n=

Q(x)ϕn

m=

m+

 

λ

–

. (.)

Furthermore, over the circle|λ|=bpwe get

m=

m+

 

λ

–

= p

m=

m+

 

λ

–

+

m=p+

m+

 

λ

(8)

< p

m=

|λ|–

m+ 

–

+

m=p+

m+ 

–|λ|

–

= p

m=

(p+ )–

m+ 

–

+

m=p+

m+ 

– (p+ ) –

< p

m=

(p+ )–

p+ 

–

+

m=p+

m+ 

– (p+ ) –

m+ 

+ (p+ ) –

< (p+ )

p+ 

–

+ p

–

m=p+

m+ 

– (p+ ) –

. (.)

It can be easily shown that

m+ 

– (p+ )>  

m–p (mp+ ) (.)

and

m=p+

m–p–< p–. (.)

From (.), (.) and (.) we get

m=o m+

 

λ

–

<p–+ p– < p–. (.)

From (.) and (.) we obtain

QRλσ(H)< p

–

n=

Q(x)ϕn |λ|=bp

.

Theorem . If the operator function Q(x)satisfies conditions(Q), (Q), (Q),and(Q),

then we have the formula

m=

n=

λmn

m+ 

– 

π

π

trQ(x)dx

= 

trQ(π) –trQ().

Proof By using Theorem ., Lemma . and Lemma ., we find

|Mp|=

 π

|λ|

=bp trQRλ

<  π

|λ|=bp

trQRλ

(9)

≤  π

|λ|=bp

QRλ

σ(H)||

≤  π

|λ|=bp

QRλQRλσ(H)||

Qπ

|λ|=bp

RλQRλσ(H)||

<c

|λ|=bp p–

= π·bp·c·p–= πc(p+ )p–<cp–. (.)

Herecis a positive constant.

By using formula (.), Lemma . and Lemma ., we find

|Mp|=  π

|λ|=b

p λtr

QRλ

bpπ

|λ|=bp

Rλ

QRλ

||

bpπ

|λ|=bp

RλQRλσ

(H)|| ≤ bp

π

|λ|=bp

RλQRλ

QRλσ(H)||

bpπ

|λ|=bp

RλQRλ

QRλσ(H)|| < c·bpp–

=c(p+ )p–<cp–. (.)

From (.) and (.) we get

lim

p→∞Mp=plim→∞Mp= . (.)

From (.) and (.) we obtain

p

m=

n=

λmn

m+ 

– 

π

π

trQ(x)dx

= –

π

p

m=

π

trQ(x)cos(m+ )x dx+Mp+Mp. (.)

From (.) and (.) we find

m=

n=

λmn

m+ 

– 

π

π

trQ(x)dx

= –

π

m=

π

(10)

Moreover, using conditions (Q) and (Q), we get

–

π

m=

π

trQ(x)cos(m+ )x dx

= –  π

m=

π

trQ(x)cosmx dx– (–)m π

trQ(x)cosmx dx

= – 

m=

π

π

trQ(x)cosmx dx

cosm +

π

π

trQ(x)dx

cos

+  

m=

π

π

trQ(x)cosmx dx

cos+

π

π

trQ(x)dx

cosπ

= 

trQ(π) –trQ(). (.)

From (.) and (.) we find

m=

n=

λmn

m+ 

– 

π

π

trQ(x)dx

= 

trQ(π) –trQ() .

The theorem is proved.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Ehliman Adıgüzelov for his expert assistance and for contributions in detailed editing of the last version of this manuscript.

Received: 20 April 2015 Accepted: 15 September 2015 References

1. Gelfand, IM, Levitan, BM: On a formula for eigenvalues of a differential operator of second order. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR88(4), 593-596 (1953)

2. Dikiy, LA: About a formula of Gelfand-Levitan. Usp. Mat. Nauk8(2), 119-123 (1953)

3. Halberg, CJ, Kramer, VA: A generalization of the trace concept. Duke Math. J.27(4), 607-618 (1960)

4. Levitan, BM: The computation of the regularized trace of Sturm Liouville operator. Usp. Mat. Nauk19, 161-164 (1964) 5. Bayramoglu, M, Aslanova, N: Formula for second regularized trace of a problem with spectral parameter dependent

boundary condition. Hacet. J. Math. Stat.40(5), 635-647 (2011)

6. Levitan, BM, Sargsyan, IS: Sturm-Liouville and Dirac Operators. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1991)

7. Fulton, TC, Pruess, SA: Eigenvalue and eigenfunction asymptotics for regular Sturm-Liouville problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl.188, 297-340 (1994)

8. Aslanova, NM: Trace formula for Sturm-Liouville operator equation. Proc. Inst. Math. Mech. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb.26, 53-61 (2007)

9. Gül, E: The trace formula for a differential operator of fourth order with bounded operator coefficients and two terms. Turk. J. Math.28, 231-254 (2004)

10. Halilova, RZ: On regularization of the trace of the Sturm-Liouville operator equation. Funks. Analiz, teoriya funksiy i ik pril.-Mahaçkala1(3), 154-161 (1976)

11. Adıgüzelov, EE: About the trace of the difference of two Sturm-Liouville operators with operator coefficient. Iz. An Az. SSR, Seriya Fiz-Tekn. i. Mat. Nauk5, 20-24 (1976)

12. Maksudov, FG, Bayramoglu, M, Adıgüzelov, EE: On a regularized traces of the Sturm-Liouville operator on a finite interval with the unbounded operator coefficient. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR [English translation: Sov. Math. Dokl.]30(1), 169-173 (1984)

13. Adıgüzelov, EE, Avcı, H, Gül, E: The trace formula for Sturm-Liouville operator with operator coefficient. J. Math. Phys.

42(6), 1611-1624 (2001)

14. Adıgüzelov, EE, Kanar, P: The regularized trace of a second order differential operator with unbounded operator coefficient. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math.22(3), 349-365 (2005)

References

Related documents

Three cases with psychiatric disorder who showed symptoms of severe hyperammonemia encephalopathy and had taken valproate with antipsychotics, especially

To illustrate the incentives involved in the equilibrium choice of policy variables, consider a two-state federation in which interstate transfers are only conditioned on state

In particular, MUM filters out macros that are replaced by longer macros (e.g. a move-drop macro can be replaced by the pick-move-drop macro). Also, MUM uses “entanglements”

Thus, keeping in view of the above facts the present study was an attempt to estimate the proximate composition, functional properties, mineral properties and physical

Bioaugmentation with the fungal isolates enhanced the remediation of used engine oil contaminated soil as reflected in the biodegradation constant and half life of the

Koala is basically a component model and a language which describes the architecture and it is used to develop a lot of products by using different kinds of

Degryse, De Goeij ve Kappert (2009); 2003-2005 dönemini yıllık verilerle inceledikleri ve Hollanda imalat sanayi sektöründe faaliyet gösteren küçük ve orta