• No results found

Global and blow up solutions for quasilinear parabolic equations with a gradient term and nonlinear boundary flux

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Global and blow up solutions for quasilinear parabolic equations with a gradient term and nonlinear boundary flux"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Global and blow-up solutions for quasilinear

parabolic equations with a gradient term and

nonlinear boundary flux

Changjun Li, Lu Sun and Zhong Bo Fang

*

*Correspondence:

[email protected] School of Mathematical Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, P.R. China

Abstract

This work is concerned with positive classical solutions for a quasilinear parabolic equation with a gradient term and nonlinear boundary flux. We find sufficient conditions for the existence of global and blow-up solutions. Moreover, an upper bound for the ‘blow-up time’, an upper estimate of the ‘blow-up rate’ and an upper estimate of the global solution are given. Finally, some application examples are presented.

MSC: 35R45; 35K65; 34A12

Keywords: quasilinear parabolic equations; gradient term; boundary flux; blow-up; global solution

1 Introduction

In this paper, we consider the quasilinear parabolic equation with a gradient term

g(u)t=∇ ·a(u)b(x)c(t)∇u+f(x,u,q,t) inD×(,T), (.) subject to the nonlinear boundary flux and initial conditions

∂u

∂n=h(x,t)r(u) on∂D×(,T), (.) u(x, ) =u(x) inD. (.)

HereD⊂RN (N) is a bounded domain with a smooth boundaryD,Dis the closure

ofD, q=|∇u|,nis the outer normal vector andT is the maximum existence time of u(x,t).a(u)b(x)c(t),f(x,u,q,t) andh(x,t)r(u) are nonlinear diffusion coefficient, reaction term and boundary flux, respectively. LetR+= (, +),R+= [, +), and suppose that the

functiong(s)∈C(R+),g(s) >  for anys> ,a(s)C(R+),b(x)C(D),c(t)C(R+), f(x,u,q,t)∈C(D×R+×R+×R+) is a nonnegative function,h(x,t)C(D×(,T)), r(s)∈C(R+) is a positive function, and the positive functionu

(x)∈C(D) satisfies the

compatibility conditions. Under these assumptions, the classical parabolic equation the-ory [, Section ] ensures that there exists a unique classical solutionu(x,t) to problem (.)-(.) for someT> , and the solution is positive overD×[,T). Moreover, by the regularity theorem [, Chapter ], we knowuC(D×(,T))C(D×(,T)).

(2)

Equation (.) describes the diffusion of concentration of some Newtonian fluids through porous media or the density of some biological species in many physical phe-nomena and combustion theories (see [, ]). The nonlinear Neumann boundary value condition (.) can be physically interpreted as the nonlinear radial law (see,e.g., [, ]).

In recent years the questions like blow-up and global solvability for nonlinear evolu-tion equaevolu-tions have been investigated extensively by many authors. In particular, for the parabolic equations with a gradient term, we refer to [–]etc. For example, Souplet and Weissler [] studied the semilinear parabolic equation

ut=u+f(u,∇u) inD×(,T),

subject to the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition. By using the comparison prin-ciple and constructing a self-similar lower solution, they obtained sufficient conditions for global existence and blow-up solutions. Andreu [] used a similar method to study the quasilinear parabolic equation

ut=um+f

u,∇um inD×(,T).

Chen [] considered the following semilinear parabolic equation:

ut=u+f(u) +g(u)|∇u| inD×(,T),

with the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition. By estimating the integral of ratio of one solution to the other, the author proved both global existence and blow-up results. Then he used the same method to study a more generalized equation with a gradient term, see [].

For the nonlinear parabolic equations with Neumann boundary conditions, Lair and Oxley [] considered the quasilinear parabolic equation without a gradient term

ut=∇ ·

a(u)∇u+f(u) inD×(,T),

subject to the homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions, and they obtained the nec-essary and sufficient conditions for the global existence and blow-up solution by the ap-proximation method. Recently, Ding and Gao [] investigated an initial boundary value problem of the quasilinear parabolic equation with a gradient term

g(u)t=u+fx,u,|∇u|,t inD×(,T),

subject to boundary flux ∂u

∂n=r(u), and they obtained sufficient conditions for the global

(3)

2 Main results and proof

We now state and prove the main results of this paper. Firstly, we give sufficient conditions of the existence of a blow-up solution of problem (.)-(.).

Theorem  Let uC(D×(,T))C(D×(,T))be a solution of problem(.)-(.). Assume that the following conditions hold:

()For any(x,s,q,t)∈D×R×R+×R+,

a(s) > , b(x) > , c(t) > , r(s) > , h(x,t)≥; (.)

()For any(x,s,q,t)∈D×R+×R+×R+,

a(s)≥, ht(x,t)≥, fq≥,

a(s)

g(s)

≥, r(s)≥a

(s)

a(s)r(s),

r(s)≥a

(s)

a(s)r

(s),

(.)

c(t)≥, g(s) > , ft(x,s,q,t)≥

c(t)

c(t)f(x,s,q,t),

fs(x,s,q,t)≥

r(s)

r(s)f(x,s,q,t);

(.)

()For any x∈ {x|f(x,u,q, ) = ,xD},

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

≥; (.)

()The constant

β=min

D

a(u) g(u)r(u)

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

+f(x,u,q, ) > , (.)

where D={x|f(x,u,q, )= ,xD} =φ,q=|∇u|;

()The integration

+∞

M

a(s)

r(s)ds< +∞, where M=maxD

u(x); (.)

then the solution u(x,t)of system(.)-(.)must blow up in finite time T and

T≤  β

+∞

M

a(s)

r(s)ds, (.)

u(x,t)≤–β(Tt), (.)

where(z) =z+∞ar((ss))ds,z> ,and–is the inverse function of.

Proof Consider the auxiliary function

= – 

r(u)ut+β

(4)

We find that

= r

rutu

rutβ a

a∇u, (.)

=

r r – 

(r)

r

qut+ 

r

r∇u· ∇ut+ r rutu

rut

β

a a– 

(a) a

qβ(a

)

au, (.)

and

t=

r r(ut)

r(ut)tβ

(a)

aut

= r

r(ut) rg

abcu+abcq+acb· ∇u+f

t

β(a

)

aut

= r

r(ut)

β(a) aut

gr

abcutu+abcu+abcut+abcqut

+abcq+ abcu· ∇ut

+acutb· ∇u+acb· ∇u+acb· ∇ut+ fqu· ∇ut+ft+fuut

+ g

(g)r

abcu+abcq+acb· ∇u+fut. (.)

Hence, from (.) and (.) we have

abc

g t

=

abc g

r r – 

abc g

(r)

r + abc

g

rabc

r g

(g)

qut + abc g r r + 

abc g

r+  fq

g

r

u· ∇ut

+

abc g

r r +

abc grabc r g

(g)

utu+

abc g

rβ abc

g a a + β

abc g

(a)

a

q

+

abc g

rβ abc

g a a

ur

r(ut) +βa

aut+ ac

grutb· ∇u+ ac

grb· ∇u

+ ft

gr+ fu

grutac

r g

(g)utb· ∇uf r

g

(g)ut. (.)

Using (.) leads to

ut= –rβ

ar a∇u+

r

rutu. (.)

Now substituting (.) into (.) yields

abc

g +

ac gb+ 

fq

gu+  bc g

(ar)

ru

t

=

abc g

r r +

abc g

r+  abc

g r r+ 

fq

g r

rabc

r g

(g)

(5)

+ abc

g

rβ abc

g a au

+

abc g

r r +

abc grabc r g

(g)

utu+

ac gr+

ac g

r r –

ac r

g

(g)

utb· ∇u

+

abc g

rβ abc

g a a – β

abc g

a a

r r – β

fq

g ar

a q+ βa

a + fu

grf r

g

(g)

ut

r

r(ut) +

ac grβ

ac g

a a

b· ∇u+ ft

gr. (.)

In fact, from (.) we see that

u= 

abc

gutabcqacb· ∇uf

. (.)

Thus combining (.) and (.), we arrive at

abc

g +

ac gb+ 

fq

gu+  bc g

(ar)

ru

t

=

abc g

r r +

abc g

r+ abc

g r r + 

fq

g r r

(a)bc agr qut +

β(a

)bc

agβ abc

ag – β abc

ag

r– β ar

afq g q + c crf g r r –

a a f gr+ fu

gr

ut+

ft

grc

c f gr

+βa

af g+

a ar–  r g

(g)

(ut). (.)

In view of (.), we have

ut= –r+β

r

a. (.)

If we substitute (.) into (.), then it is easy to obtain

abc

g +

ac gb+ 

fq

gu+  bc g

(ar)

ru

+

ar a

+r

qabc gr + 

fq

g r

rq+ ar g f ar u +c

c t

=βbc g r ra a r r

q+ βfq g

r a

ar a

q+βc

ac+ a ar–  r g g

(ut)

+ 

gr

ft

c cf

+βag

fuf

r r

=βabc gr

r a

q+ βfq g

r a

q+β c

ac+ g ar a g

(ut)

+ c

gr

f c

t

(6)

From assumptions (.)-(.), it follows that the right-hand side of (.) is nonnegative,

i.e.,

abc

g +

ac gb+ 

fq

gu+  bc g

(ar)

ru

+

ar a

+r

qabc gr + 

fq

g r

rq+ ar

g

f ar

u

+c

c t≥. (.)

Then from (.) and (.) we have

max

D

(x, ) =max

D

– 

g(u)r(u)

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

+f(x,u,q, )

+βa(u)

≤. (.)

And as we can see, an explicit calculation

∂n =

r rut

∂u ∂n

r ∂ut

∂nβ a a

∂u ∂n=

r rhut

r(hr)tβ a ahr

= r

rhuthtr

rhutβ a

ahr= –htβ a

ahr≤ (.)

holds on ∂D×(,T). Thus, by combining (.)-(.) and using the Hopf maximum principle, we find that the maximum ofon∂D×(,T) is ,i.e.,

≤ on∂D×(,T), and by (.), it gives

a(u)

r(u)utβ. (.) Integrating (.) over [,t] at the pointx∈D, whereu(x) =M, yields

β

u(x,t)

M

a(s)

r(s)dst. (.) This together with assumption (.) shows thatu(x,t) must blow up in finite timeT; more-over,

T≤  β

+∞

M

a(s)

r(s)ds. (.) For each fixedx, integrating inequality (.) over [t,s] ( <t<s<T) leads to

u(x,t)≥u(x,t)–u(x,s)=

u(x,s)

u(x,t) a(s)

r(s)dsβ(st). If we letsT, then formally

(7)

therefore

u(x,t)≤–β(Tt).

The proof is completed. The result on the global solution is stated as Theorem  below.

Theorem  Let uC(D×(,T))C(D×(,T))be a solution of problem(.)-(.). Assume that the following conditions hold:

()For any(x,s,q,t)∈D×R×R+×R+,

a(s) > , b(x) > , c(t) > , r(s) > , h(x,t)≥; (.) ()For any(x,s,q,t)∈D×R+×R+×R+,

a(s)≤, ht(x,t)≤, fq≤,

a(s)

g(s)

≤,

r(s)≥a

(s)

a(s)r(s), r

(s)a(s)

a(s)r

(s),

(.)

c(t)≤, g(s) > , ft(x,s,q,t)≤

c(t)

c(t)f(x,s,q,t),

fs(x,s,q,t)≤

r(s)

r(s)f(x,s,q,t);

(.)

()For any x∈ {x|f(x,u,q, ) = ,xD},

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

≥; (.)

()The constant

α=max

D

a(u) g(u)r(u)

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

+f(x,u,q, ) > , (.)

where D={x|f(x,u,q, ) = ,xD} =φ,q=|∇u|;

()The integration

+∞

m

a(s)

r(s)ds< +∞, where m=minD

u(x); (.)

then the solution u(x,t)of system(.)-(.)must be a global solution and u(x,t)≤–αt+u(x)

, (.)

where(z) =mz

a(s)

r(s)ds,z> ,and

–is the inverse function of. Proof Consider the auxiliary function

= – 

r(u)ut+α

(8)

We first replace andβ in (.) withandα, respectively, and under assumptions (.)-(.), we get

abc

g

ac gb+ 

fq

gu+  bc

g

(ar)

ru

+

ar a

+r

qabc gr + 

fq

g r

rq+ ar

g

f ar

u

+c

c t≤. (.)

In fact, from (.) and (.) we can see that

min

D

(x, ) =min

D

– 

g(u)r(u)

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

+f(x,u,q, )

+αa(u)

≥. (.)

Also, on∂D×(,T), it gives

∂n = –htα a

ahr≥. (.)

By combining (.)-(.) and using the Hopf maximum principle, we find that the min-imum ofon∂D×(,T) is ,i.e.,

≥ in∂D×(,T), and by (.), we can see that

a(u)

r(u)utα. (.) For each fixedx, integrating (.) over [,t] yields

α

u(x,t)

u(x)

a(s)

r(s)dst. (.) This together with assumption (.) shows thatu(x,t) must be a global solution; more-over,

u(x,t)–u(x)

=

u(x,t)

u(x)

a(s)

r(s)dsαt, therefore

u(x,t)≤–αt+u(x)

.

The proof is completed.

3 Applications

(9)

Example  Letube a solution of

eut=∇ ·

eu

 +

i= xi

etu

+

 +

i= xi

euqet inD×(,T),

∂u ∂n= 

 +t

i= xi

eu on∂D×(,T),

u(x, ) =u(x) =  +e 

i=

xi inD,

whereD={x= (x,x,x)|

i=xi < }, then we have

g(u) =eu, a(u) =eu, b(x) =  +

i=

xi, c(t) =et,

f(x,u,q,t) =

 +

i= xi

euqet, h(x,t) = 

 +t

i= xi

, r(u) =eu.

It is easy to verify that (.)-(.) hold. By (.), we find

β=min

D

a(u) g(u)r(u)

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

+f(x,u,q, )

= min ≤u<+e

 

u|∇u|+|∇u|+uu+euu|∇u| = e.

It follows from Theorem  thatu(x,t) must blow up in finite timeTand

T≤  β

+∞

M

a(s)

r(s)ds= 

β

+∞

es

esds=

 e

–,

and

u(x,t)≤–β(Tt)=ln

 e(Tt)

–

.

Example  Letube a solution of

(uu)t=∇ ·

u

 +

i= xi

  +tu

+

 +

i= xi

 –q

 +t

u inD×(,T),

∂u ∂n=

 +t

i= xi

–

u in∂D×(,T),

u(x, ) =u(x) =  + 

i=

(10)

whereD={x= (x,x,x)|

i=xi < }, then we have

g(u) =uu, a(u) =√

u, b(x) =

 +

i= xi

, c(t) =   +t,

f(x,u,q,t) =

 +

i= xi

 –q

 +t

u, h(x,t) =√

 +t

i= xi

–

, r(u) =√u.

It is easy to verify that (.)-(.) hold. By (.), we find

α=max

D

a(u) g(u)r(u)

a(u)b(x)c()∇u

+f(x,u,q, )

= max ≤u<

 

u– |∇u|+ u–u+ 

 –|∇u|– =

 . It follows from Theorem  thatu(x,t) must be a global solution and

u(x,t)≤–αt+u(x)

=exp(αt+lnu) =uexp

 t

.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2012AM018) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 201362032). The authors would like to deeply thank all the reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.

Received: 27 February 2014 Accepted: 29 May 2014 Published:05 Jun 2014

References

1. Amann, H: Quasilinear parabolic systems under nonlinear boundary conditions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.92, 153-192 (1986)

2. Sperb, RP: Maximum Principles and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York (1981) 3. Bebernes, J, Eberly, D: Mathematical Problems from Combustion Theory. Springer, New York (1989)

4. Diaz, JI, Thelin, FD: On a nonlinear parabolic problem arising in some model related to turbulent flows. SIAM J. Math. Anal.25, 1085-1111 (1994)

5. Filo, J: Diffusivity versus absorption through the boundary. J. Differ. Equ.99, 281-305 (1992)

6. Levine, HA, Payne, LE: Nonexistence theorems for the heat equation with nonlinear boundary conditions and for porous medium equation backward in time. J. Differ. Equ.16, 319-334 (1974)

7. Souplet, P, Weissler, FB: Self-similar subsolutions and blowup for nonlinear parabolic equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 212, 60-74 (1997)

8. Andreu, F, Mazón, JM, Simondon, F, Toledo, J: Blow up for a class of nonlinear parabolic problems. Asymptot. Anal. 29(2), 143-155 (2002)

9. Chen, SH: Global existence and blowup of solutions for a parabolic equation with a gradient term. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.129, 975-981 (2001)

10. Chen, SH, Yu, DM: Global existence and blowup solutions for quasilinear parabolic equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.335, 151-167 (2007)

11. Lair, AV, Oxley, ME: A necessary and sufficient condition for global existence for degenerate parabolic boundary value problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl.221, 338-348 (1998)

12. Ding, JT, Guo, BZ: Global existence and blow-up solutions for quasilinear reaction-diffusion equations with a gradient term. Appl. Math. Lett.24, 936-942 (2011)

10.1186/1029-242X-2014-234

References

Related documents

Many authors discussed the blow-up and global solutions for nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations under Neumann boundary conditions and obtained a lot of interesting results; we

Motivated by it, we intend to find the sufficient conditions of the existence of global and blow-up solutions of problem (.)-(.) by using the method of upper-lower solution,

Chung, S.-Y.: Critical blow-up and global existence for discrete nonlinear p-Laplacian parabolic equations. Chung, S.-Y., Hwang, J.: A complete characterization of the

Nakao, M, Chen, CS: Global existence and gradient estimates for the quasilinear parabolic equations of m-Laplacian type with a nonlinear convection term. Ohara, Y: L ∞ estimates

Song, XF: Blow-up analysis for a system of heat equations with nonlinear flux which obey different laws. Wang, MX: Parabolic systems with a nonlinear

The first purpose in this paper is to investigate the sufficient conditions to the global existence or nonexistence of the classical solution to the bound- ary value problem

Li, Blow-up solutions and global solutions for a class of quasilinear parabolic equations with Robin boundary conditions, Comput... McLeod, Blow-up of positive solutions of

The problems with nonlinear reaction term and nonlinear diffusion include blow-up and global existence conditions of solutions, blow-up rates and blow-up sets, etc.. Here, we