• No results found

Generalized I Convergent Difference Double Sequence Spaces Defined By A Moduli Sequence

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Generalized I Convergent Difference Double Sequence Spaces Defined By A Moduli Sequence"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Generalized I-Convergent Difference Double Sequence

Spaces Defined By A Moduli Sequence

Naveen Kumar Srivastava Department of Mathematics St. Andrew’s College, Gorakhpur, U.P. srivastava.drnaveenkumar@gmail.com

Abstract:-In this article we introduce the sequence space I

0

c

(F,

n) and

I(F,

n) for the sequence of F = (fk) and given some inclusion relations.

Keywords:-Ideal Filter, Sequence of Moduli, Difference Sequence Space, F-Convergent Sequence Space.

I. INTRODUCTION

Let ,

,

c

0 be the set of all sequences of complex numbers, the linear spaces of bounded, convergent and null sequences x = (xk) with complex terms, respectively, normed by

||x||

= where K

N = 1, 2, 3 ….. The idea of difference sequence spaces was introduced by H. Kizmaz [10]. In 1981, Kizmaz defined the sequence spaces as follows;

(

) = {x = (xk)

: (

x

k)

}, c(

) = {x = (xk)

: (

x

k)

c},

0

c

(

) = {x = (xk)

: (

x

k)

c

0}, Where

x= (xk – xk+1) and

0x= (xk), There are Banach spaces with the norm

||

x

||

= |x1| +

||

x

||

. Later Colak and Et [2] defined the sequence spaces:

(

n) = {x = (xk)

: (

nxk)

},

c(

n) = {x = (xk)

(

nxk)

c},

0

c

(

n) = {x = (xk)

 : (

nxk)

c

0}, Where

n

N,

0x = (xk),

x = (xk – xk+1),

nx = (

nxk) = (

1 n

xk 

n1xk+1)}

nxk =  

n

0 v

(1)n

v

n

xk+v,

And so that these are Banach space with the norm

||

x

||

=  

n

1 i

|xi| +

||

n

x

||

.

The idea of modulus was defined by Nakano [15] in 1953. A function

f : [0,

)[0,

) is called a modulus if

(i) f(t) = 0 if and only if t = 0, (ii)f(t+u)

f(t)+f(u), for all t,u

, (iii)f is increasing and

(iv)f is continuous from the right at 0.

Let X be a sequence spaces. Then the sequence spaces X(f) is defined as

X(f) = {x = (xk) : (f(|xk|))

X}

For a modulus f. Maddox and Ruckle [14,16]

Kolak [11, 12] gave an extension of X(f) by considering a sequence of moduli F = (fk) that is

(2)

After then Gaur and Mursaleen [9] defined the following sequence spaces

(F,

) = {x = (

xk)

(F)},

0

c

(F,

) = {x = (xk) : (

xk)

c

0(F)}, For a sequence of moduli F = (fk).

We defined the following sequence spaces :

2

(F,

nm) = {x = (xi,j) : (

nmxi,j)

2(F)},

2 0

c

(F,

nm) = {x = (xi,j) : (

nmxi,j)

c

02(F)}, Where

n m

xij = 

 

n

0 v m

0 u

(1)u+v









v

n

u

n

xi+mu, k+mv

for a sequence of moduli F = (fij) we will give the necessary and sufficient conditions for the inclusion relations between X(

nm) and sufficient conditions for the inclusion relations between X(

nm) and Y(F,

nm), where X,Y =

2 or

c

20. Sequences of moduli have been studied by C.A. Bektas and R. Colak [1] and many other authors.

The notion of statical convergence was introduced by H. Fast [6]. Later on it was studied by J.A. Fridy [7,8] from the sequence space point view and linked with the summability theory.

The notion of I-convergence is a generalization of the statical convergence. It was studied at initial stage by Kostyrko, Salat and Wilezynski [13]. Later on it was studied by Salat [19], Salat, Tripathy and Ziman [20], Demric [3].

Let N be a non empty set. Then a family of sets I

2N (power set of N) is said to be an ideal if I is additive i.e. (A,B)

I

(A

B)

I and i.e. A

I, B

A

B

I. A non empty family of sets £(I) 2N is said to be filter on N if and only if

£(I) for A,  £(I) we have (

) £(I) and each A

£(I) and  implies B £(I).

An ideal I 2N is called non trivial it I 2N. A non trivial

 is called admissible if {(x) : x } I. A non trivial

ideal is maximal ideal is maximal it there cannot exist any non-trivial ideal J containing I as a subset. For each ideal I, there exist a filter £(I) corresponding to I, i.e. £(I) = {

K

c}, where

K

c = N – K.

Definition 1.1: A sequence (xij)  is said to be I-convergent to a number L if for every  > 0. {i,j : |xijL| }  I. In this case we write I –

  j i

lim

xij = L.

Definition 1.2: A sequence (xij)  is said to be I-null if L = 0. In this case we write I 

  j i

lim

xij = 0.

Definition 1.3: A sequence (xij) is said to be I-cauchy if for every  > 0, there exist a number m = m() such that {i,j  N : |xij  xm,n| } I.

Definition 1.4: A sequence (xij)  is said to be I-bounded if there exist M > 0 such that {K  N : |xij|  M}.

We need the following Lemmas.

Lemma 1.5 : The condition supij fij(t) < , t > 0 hold if and only if there is a point t0 > 0 such that supij fij(t0) <  (see [1, 9]).

Lemma 1.6: The condition infij fij(t) > 0 hold if and only if there exist is a point t0 > 0 such that infij fij(t0) > 0 (see [1, 9]).

Lemma 1.7: Let K  £(I) and . If MI, the M

K

I (see [20]).

Lemma 1.8: If I 2N and . If M I then M

K I (see [13]).

II. MAIN RESULT

In this article we introduce the following classes of sequence cpaces.

I 0 2

c

(F,

nm) = {(xi,j)  : I –   j i

lim

fi,j(|

nmxi,j|)= 0} I,

I 2

(F,

nm) = {(xi,j)  : I – supi,j fi,j(|

nmxi,j|) < }  I.
(3)

(a)

2

I(

nm) 2

I(F,

nm),

(b)

2

c

0I(

nm) 2

c

I0(F,

nm),

(c)

Supi,j fi,j(t) <  , (t > 0).

Proof: (a) Implies (b) is obvious.

(b) implies (c). Let 2

c

I0(

nm) 2

c

0I(F,

nm). Suppose that (c) is not true. Then by Lemma (1.5)

j , i

sup

fi,j(t) = , for all t > 0,

And therefore there is a sequence (ki) of positive integers such that

i k

f

i

1

> i, for each i = 1, 2, 3 ….. (1)

Define x = (xi,j) as follows

xij =

.

otherewise

0

...;

3

,

2

,

1

i

k

j

,

i

if

i

1

i

Then x  2

c

I0(

nm) but by (1), x 

I(F,

nm) which contradicts (b). Hence (c) must hold, (c) implies (a). Let (c) be satisfied and x  2

I(F,

nm). If we suppose that x 2

I (F,

nm) then

j , i

sup

fi,j(|

nmxi,j|) =  for x 2

I

If we take t = |

nmx| then j , i

sup

fi,j(t) =  which contradicts (c).

Hence 2

I(

nm)  2

I(F,

nm).

Theorem 2.2: For a sequence F = fi,j is a sequence of moduli, the following statements are equivalent :

(a)

2

c

I0(F,

nm)  2

c

0I(

nm),

(b)

2

c

I0(F,

nm)  2

I(

nm),

(c)

Infi,j fi,j(t) > 0, (t > 0).

Proof: (a) implies (b) is obvious.

(b) implies (c). Let 2

c

0I(F,

nm)  2

I(

nm). Suppose that (c) is not true. Then by Lemma (1.6)

Infi,j fi,j(t) = 0, (t > 0)

And therefore there is a sequence (ki) of positive integers such that

i k

f

(i2) <

i

1

for each I = 1, 2, 3 ….. (2)

Define x = (xi,j) as follows

xi,j =



otherwise

0

...;

3

,

2

,

1

i

k

k

if

,

i

2 i

By (2) x  2

c

0I(F,

nm) but x 

I(

n) which contradicts (b). Hence (c) must hold. (c) implies (a). Let (c) be satisfied and x  2

c

I0(F,

nm) that is

I –   j i

lim

fi,j(|

nmxi,j|) = 0

Suppose that x  2

c

I0(

nm). Then for some number 0 > 0 and positive integer k0 we have |

nmxi,j|  c0 for ki,j > k0. Therefore fij(c0) fij(|

nmxi,j|) for I,j > k0 and hence

  j i

lim

fi,j(c0) > 0,

Which contradicts our assumption that x  2

c

0I(

nm).

Thus 2

c

I0(F,

nm)  2

c

0I(

nm).

Theorem 2.3: The inclusion 2

I(F,

nm)  2

c

I0(

nm) holds in and only if

  j i

lim

fi,j(t) =  for t > 0 ……… (3)
(4)

such that

  j i

lim

fij(t) =  for t > 0 does not hold. Then there is a number t0>0 and a sequence (ki) of positive integer such that

i k

f

(t0)  M < . ……. (4)

Define the sequence x = (xij) by

xij =

otherwise

0

...;

3

,

2

,

1

i

ki

j

,

i

if

,

t

0

Thus x 2

I(F,

nm) by (4).

But x  2

c

0I(

nm), so that (3) must hold.

If

I(F,

n) 

c

I0(

n).

Conversely, let (3) hold. If x  2

I(F,

nm),

then fi,j(|

nmxij|)  M < , for i,j = 1, 2, 3 ….. Suppose that x 

c

I0(

n).

Then for some number c0 > 0 and positive integer k0 we have |

n

xij| < c0 for i,j  k0.

Therefore fi,j(c0)  fi,j(|

nxij|)  M for i,j k0, which contradicts (3).

Hence x  2

c

I0(

nm).

Theorem 2.4: The inclusion 2

I(

nm)  2

c

I0(F,

nm) holds if and only if

  j i

lim

fi,j(t) = 0, for t > 0 …….. (5)

Proof: Suppose that 2

I(

nm)  2

c

I0(F,

nm) but (5) does not hold

Then

  j i

lim

fij(t0) = i  0, for some t0 > 0 ……….(6)

Define the sequence x = (xij) by

xij = t0 u v

n i

0 v n i

0 u

)

1

(

 

  

v

j

v

i

1

u

i

n

i

v

i

n

for i,j = 1, 2, 3 ….. Then x 2

c

0I(F,

nm) by (6). Hence (5) must hold, conversely, let x  2

I(

nm) and suppose that (5) holds.

Then |

nmxij|M< for K=1, 2, 3, …..

There for fij(|

nmxij|)fij(M) for i,j = 1, 2, 3 ….. and

ij

lim

fij(|

nmxij|) 

  j i

lim

fij(M) = 0 by (5).

Hence x2

c

0I(F,

nm).

REFERENCES

[1]. Bektas, C.A. and R. Colak : Generalized difference sequence spaces defined by a sequence of moduli, Soochow. J. Math., 29(2)(2003), 164, 215-220.

[2]. Colak, R. and M. ve Et. : On some generalized difference sequence spaces and related matrix transformations, Hokkaido Math. J., 26(3) (1997), 483-492.

[3]. Demerici, K.: I-limit superior and limit inferior, Math. Commun.,6(2001), 165-172.

[4]. Dems K. : On I-Cauchy sequences, Real Analysis Exchange, 30(2005), 123-128.

[5]. Esi, A. and M. Isik : Some generalized difference sequence spaces, Thai J. Math., 3(2) (2005), 241-247. [6]. Fast, H. : Sur la convergence statistique, Colloq. Math.,

2(1951), 241-244.

[7]. Friday, J.A. : On statical convergence, Analysis, 5(1985), 301-313.

[8]. Fridy, J.A. : Statistical limit points, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 11(1993), 1187-1192.

[9]. Gaur, A.K. and Mursaleen, M. : Difference sequence spaces defined by a sequence of moduli, Demonstratio Math., 31(1908), 275-278.

(5)

[11]. E. Kolak, On strong boundedness and summability with respect to a sequence of moduli, Acta Comment. Univ. Tatrtn., 960(1993), 41-50.

[12]. Kolak, E. : Inclusion theorems for some sequence spaces defined by a sequence of modulii, Acta Comment. Univ. Tartn., 970(1194), 65-72.

[13]. Kostyrko, P.; Salat, T. and Wilczynski, W. : I-convergence, Real analysis exchange, 26(2) (2000), 669-686.

[14]. Maddox, I.J. : Sequence spaces defined by a modulus, Math. Camb. Phil. Soc., 100(1986), 161-166. [15]. Nakano , H.; Concave modulars, J. Math. Soc. Japan,

5(1953), 29-49.

[16]. Ruckle, W.H.: On perfect Symmetric BK-spaces, Math. Ann.,175(1968), 121-126.

[17]. Ruckle, W.H. : Symmetric coordinate space and symmetric bases, Canada, J. Math., 19(1967), 828-838. [18]. Ruckle, W.H. : FK-spaces in which the sequence of

coordinate vector is bounded, Canada, J. Math., 25(5) (1973), 973-975.

[19]. Salat, T. : On statical convergent sequences of real numbers, Math. Solvaca., 30(1980), 139-150.

References

Related documents

Min. Total Stress vs. Total Stress vs. Total Stress vs. 9) in comparison with normal operating conditions, which makes practical grounds for crack development not

In this study, the relative CI values of un- treated and HT-treated wheat straw (cultivar Robigus ) leaves and stems and the change after hydrolysis were measured (Table 4).. Wide

In Sullivan, the New York Times published an editorial-type advertise- ment criticizing the police force for its actions during a civil rights dem- onstration. 7 3 In

The Effects of Early Enteral Nutrition Products on the Healing of Colo-Colonic Anastomosis 1 Department of General Surgery, Abant Izzet Baysal University Hospital, Bolu, Turkey 2

The findings in this regard showed no significant relationship between mothers’ background and their awareness about this route of HIV transmission.. That HIV can

If intentionality is perceptually instantiated, we predicted (1) that inefficient actions would be per- ceptually “corrected” towards the more efficient action alternative, and (2)

And now they are trying the two together, trying to bribe me and threatening me if I don't take the bribe.&#34; When Ian watches a documentary about the health concerns of eating

and plantar flex the ankle from a starting position with the foot relaxed (considered the zero neutral position) with angle measurements taken at each point of dorsiflex- ion