LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL
100 Gnoss Concourse Petaluma, CA 94928•(707) 762-9020
Agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors
Live Oak Charter School Multi-purpose room
June 11, 2015
Mission & Program
To ensure the humanity and potential of its students through an education resonant with their unfolding awareness and
capacities, and supportive of the full and integrated development of body, heart, and mind. LOCS provides a K-8
program inspired by Waldorf education to children and families of Petaluma and surrounding communities. Waldorf
inspired education is a developmental approach to learning that cultivates the innate capacities of each child through
age appropriate curriculum. Live Oak educates the whole child – head, heart, and hands, through an education that
integrates each child’s creative, intellectual, emotional, physical and social domains. Live Oak offers an
interdisciplinary liberal arts program where art, music, and movement are integrated with core academic instruction.
Exploration of the natural world, human culture, language and mathematics enlivens curiosity which is the foundation
of intellectual growth, conceptual flexibility, empathy and sense of connectedness.
OPENING (7:00 pm)
PUBLIC COMMENT (7:05 pm)
This portion of the meeting is set aside for members of the audience to make comments or raise issues that are not specifically on
the agenda. These presentations are limited to three minutes per presentation and the total time allotted to non-agenda items will
not exceed fifteen minutes.
OPEN SESSION (7:20 pm)
A. Approve the agenda
B. Reports
1. Committee reports
2. Executive Director Report
C. Consent agenda (7:30 pm)
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, and all will be enacted by one motion and vote.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Board member requests items to be removed from the
Consent Agenda for separate action.
1. Board Minutes: May 14, 2015
2. Monthly Financials for May 2015
D. The board with consider the following for discussion and approval
1. Election of LOCS board members
2. Election of LOCS officers for 2015-2016
3. Local control and accountability plan 2015-2016
4. 2015-2016 Budget
CLOSED SESSION (9:30 pm)
E.
Pursuant to Government Code 54956.8
Conference with Real Property Negotiator
Property: 100 Gnoss Concourse, Petaluma; Negotiating Parties: Sonoma-Marin
Fair; under negotiation: price and terms
F.
Pursuant to Government Code 54957: Public Employee Contracts
OPEN SESSION
Fundraising Report Through April 2015
Total Fundraising Goal
: $220,000
Donations Received by Month
Month
2012/2013 Year 2013/2014 Year
2014/15 Year
July
$8,553.67
$3,006.98
$12,049.00
August
$14,366.50
$12,007.66
$10,654.23
September
$15,175.00
$19,387.00
$10,415.00
October
$14,374.88
$10,812.85
$11,894.34
November
$11,677.11
$10,737.56
$12,621.36
December
$25,598.02
$15,555.12
$23,858.48
January
$15,181.08
$28,004.31
$23,024.36
February
$12,720.00
$11,526.77
$13,265.81
March
$57,722.19
$64,440.89
$63,187.52
April
$13,688.80
$8,850.58
$25,672.54
May
$15,864.47
$19,615.61
June
$21,315.84
**$12,014.57
Total
$226,237.56
$218,459.90
$206,642.64
** Updated number for assets liquidated 08/15/14; additional grant of $6080.83 paid in September
Long-Term Capital Fund Ending Balance
$29,058.34
Annual Fund Participation by Grade
Grade
2013-‐14
2014-‐15*
K-‐Rosemary
71%
82%
K-‐Sunflower
43%
91%
1st
59%
74%
2nd
73%
78%
3rd
70%
66%
4th
46%
84%
5th
67%
45%
6th
50%
73%
7th
52%
78%
8th
50%
63%
Totals
59%
74%
LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL
1
Executive Director Report
June 11, 2015
Enrollment & Attendance
Current enrollments accepted for 2015-2016 and (Wait lists):
Kindergarten: 44 (39)
First:
32 (13)
Second:
32 (12)
Third:
32 (9)
Fourth:
32 (2)
Fifth:
32 (5)
Sixth:
32 (0)
Seventh:
31
(0)
Eighth:
32 (1)
Total:
299 (81)
Projection:
295
Facilities
The asphalt company fixed the alignment on the ramp allowing the aluminum ramp installation to proceed. Still
waiting for the revised parts for the MPR stairs.
Special Projects
I have scheduled a meeting with RSF to discuss funding opportunities in the event of a property purchase and
development. We have postponed further research on food service facilities until adoption of the state budget as
AB740 facilities grant funding is in flux. There was a substantial increase proposed by the governor but the latest
new is that the increase was pared down (from 50 million in additional funding to 20 million). Still yet to be
determined how the will impact funding rate (currently at 75%). We will delay consideration of additional grant
funding until we have more information.
Curriculum
The ELA and Math Common Core articulation is now complete. I have forwarded a copy via email to board
members and a hard copy will be available in the office. There will likely be some revision in the year to come and
we will also be revisiting the math section for the purposes of formatting to improve usability of the document by
teachers. In addition, we have finalized our report card for next year which will show modest changes from the
current year, bringing the document more in alignment with the scope and sequence we just adopted.
Human Resources
Staff are off for the summer with a long list of trainings scheduled. Staff will be participating in the annual “art of
teaching” classes at RSF as well as training in Making Math Real, Bal A Viz X, Linda Mood Bell (reading) and
developmental movement. Our employment advertising has generated a strong response for all positions. We
expect to begin interviews next week for both Spanish and Movement.
Finance
The budget will be discussed in detail later in the agenda.
Student Services
We have had a busy end of the year with a flurry of SST and IEP meetings. We have had several transition IEPs for
students making their way to high school, and have prepared to receive incoming students with IEPs of their own.
The caseload next year appears to be up by a few students, but alternately, our RTI program appears to have reduced
the backlog in intervention support and is now looking at a focused assignment for next fall, mostly in the lower
grades.
Testing
Test results are starting to trickle in, we don’t have full class results yet, but we are now seeing data. We expect to
have the full data in a couple weeks.
Inter-Agency Relations
LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL
100 Gnoss Concourse, Number 1, Petaluma, CA 94952 | 707.762.9020
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
May 14, 2015
OPENING (7:00 pm)
Present:
Karna Dawson (KD), Chair
Sarah Grossi (SG), Director
Debbie Elam (DE), Vice Chair
Josh Kizner (JK), Director
John Gerber (JG), Treasurer
Erin Wrightsman (EW), Director
Cliff Schlueter (CS), Secretary
Matthew Morgan (MM), Executive Director
PUBLIC COMMENT (7:02 pm)
No comments
OPEN SESSION (7:02 pm)
A. Approve the agenda
● DE moved to approve the agenda - all approved
B. Reports
1. Committee reports
Community Connection (C3) - EW reviewed the submitted minutes.
Finance - JG reported that the committee met to review the budget.
FOLOCS - DE reviewed the submitted fundraising report. The foundation will be seeking a new
Annual Fund manager.
2. Executive Director Report
C. Consent agenda (7:35 pm)
1. Board Minutes: April 9, 2015
2. Monthly Financials for April 2015
● DE moved to approve Consent Agenda - all approved
D. The board will consider the following for discussion
1. Update on current pending legislation, SB-277 (7:35 pm)
MM reviewed the included documents. One parent voiced their concerns regarding the impact
this legislation would have on enrollment should it pass. The Board discussed the various
aspects of the issue and the concerns of many in our school community. The Board or
Administration will contact CCSA and /or CSDC for additional information and will revisit this
topic at a future meeting.
2. Independent study program at LOCS
The Board renewed the conversation regarding the exploration of creating a robust independent
study program.
3. Food service program at LOCS (8:55 pm)
Given the logistics, costs and facilities issues involved, a food service program will not be in
place for next school year. Further development and planning is needed.
4. 2015-2016 Budget
The Board reviewed the budget documents and offered input and direction to the Finance
Committee.
5. Interview of potential board candidate
The Board interviewed Shaina Ferraro as a potential Board candidate.
E. The board will conduct a public hearing on the following (10:00 pm)
1. Local control and accountability plan 2015-2016
MM and the Board reviewed the document.
KD closed the public hearing at 10:20 pm.
F. The board with consider the following for discussion and approval (10:20 pm)
1. Memorandum of understanding governing the use of measure E Facilities Bond Funds
● DE moved to approve the MOU - all approved
CLOSED SESSION (10:25 pm)
G. Pursuant to Government Code 54956.8
Conference with Real Property Negotiator
Property: 100 Gnoss Concourse, Petaluma; Negotiating Parties: Sonoma-Marin
Fair; under negotiation: price and terms
H. Pursuant to Government Code 54957: Public Employee Contracts
OPEN SESSION (10:30 pm)
I. Report on actions from closed session
No action to report
ADJOURNMENT (10:30 pm)
LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL Attendance Tracking Budget Assumption 96%
6/11/15
2014-‐15 Attendance %
Period 1
8/20-‐9/12 9/15-‐10/10Period 2 10/13-‐11/07Period 3 11/10-‐12/5Period 4 (P1) 12/8-‐1/16Period 5 revised 1/19-‐2/13Period 6 2/16-‐3/13Period 7 Total
Student Days
Actual Attend (Inc. IS) ADA
Total Student
Days
Actual Attend
(Inc. IS) ADA Student DaysTotal Actual Attend
(Inc. IS) ADA Student DaysTotal Actual Attend (Inc. IS) ADA
Total Student
Days
Actual Attend (Inc.
IS) ADA
Total Student
Days
Actual Attend (Inc.
IS) ADA
Total Student
Days
Actual Attend (Inc. IS) ADA TK -‐ Mary Alice 102 101 99.02% 120 118 98.33% 129 128 99.22% 91 89 97.80% 126 124 98.41% 126 124 98.41% 133 131 98.50% TK -‐ Rebecca 17 17 100.00% 20 20 100.00% 29 29 100.00% 26 26 100.00% 36 36 100.00% 36 36 100.00% 38 35 92.11%
K -‐ Mary Alice 267 262 98.13% 300 289 96.33% 285 283 99.30% 195 190 97.44% 270 263 97.41% 270 260 96.30% 285 273 95.79% K -‐ Rebecca 357 341 95.52% 410 401 97.80% 376 380 101.06% 260 253 97.31% 252 245 97.22% 361 355 98.34% 380 371 97.63%
624 603 96.63% 710 690 97.18% 661 663 100.30% 455 443 97.36% 522 508 97.32% 631 615 97.46% 665 644 96.84% 1st -‐ A.R. 536 530 98.88% 640 633 98.91% 608 601 98.85% 416 398 95.67% 566 546 96.47% 558 522 93.55% 589 566 96.10% 2nd -‐ A.I. 544 539 99.08% 640 628 98.13% 608 599 98.52% 416 404 97.12% 576 559 97.05% 576 558 96.88% 608 598 98.36% 3rd -‐ J.M. 544 536 98.53% 640 624 97.50% 608 591 97.20% 411 404 98.30% 561 531 94.65% 576 547 94.97% 608 583 95.89% 4th -‐ L.W. 544 540 99.26% 640 629 98.28% 608 596 98.03% 416 411 98.80% 576 538 93.40% 576 565 98.09% 608 594 97.70% 5th -‐ T.L. 442 434 98.19% 520 507 97.50% 494 464 93.93% 351 341 97.15% 499 483 96.79% 508 475 93.50% 532 514 96.62% 6th -‐ L.B. 476 473 99.37% 560 549 98.04% 532 526 98.87% 369 361 97.83% 522 515 98.66% 522 506 96.93% 551 540 98.00% 7th -‐ G.M. 544 540 99.26% 640 627 97.97% 608 585 96.22% 416 410 98.56% 576 545 94.62% 576 538 93.40% 608 580 95.39% 8th -‐ H.S. 476 466 97.90% 560 531 94.82% 532 517 97.18% 353 313 88.67% 486 450 92.59% 486 461 94.86% 513 484 94.35%
4106 4058 98.83% 4840 4728 97.69% 4598 4479 97.41% 3148 3042 96.63% 4362 4167 95.53% 4378 4172 95.29% 4617 4459 96.58%
Schoolwide 4730 4661 98.54% 5550 5418 97.62% 5259 5142 97.78% 3603 3485 96.72% 4884 4675 95.72% 5009 4787 95.57% 5282 5103 96.61%
LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL Attendance Tracking Budget Assumption 96%
6/11/15
2014-‐15
TK -‐ Mary Alice TK -‐ Rebecca
K -‐ Mary Alice K -‐ Rebecca
1st -‐ A.R. 2nd -‐ A.I. 3rd -‐ J.M. 4th -‐ L.W. 5th -‐ T.L. 6th -‐ L.B. 7th -‐ G.M. 8th -‐ H.S.
Schoolwide Cummulative
Period 8
3/16-‐4/10 4/13-‐5/8Period 9 Period 10 5/11-‐6/5 Total
Student Days
Actual Attend (Inc. IS) ADA
Total Student
Days
Actual Attend (Inc. IS) ADA
Total Student
Days
Actual Attend (Inc. IS) ADA 105 103 98.10% 140 138 98.57% 133 130 97.74%
30 30 100.00% 40 39 97.50% 38 36 94.74%
225 216 96.00% 300 294 98.00% 285 279 97.89% 300 294 98.00% 400 388 97.00% 380 373 98.16%
525 510 97.14% 700 682 97.43% 665 652 98.05% 461 445 96.53% 600 576 96.00% 570 541 94.91% 480 472 98.33% 640 627 97.97% 608 579 95.23% 480 468 97.50% 640 614 95.94% 608 553 90.95% 480 466 97.08% 640 620 96.88% 608 575 94.57% 426 407 95.54% 560 539 96.25% 522 504 96.55% 445 430 96.63% 600 587 97.83% 570 559 98.07% 480 459 95.63% 640 616 96.25% 608 579 95.23% 405 389 96.05% 540 505 93.52% 513 480 93.57%
3657 3536 96.69% 4860 4684 96.38% 4607 4370 94.86% 4182 4046 96.75% 5560 5366 96.51% 5272 5022 95.26%
6/11/15
4:28 PM
2014-‐15
Enrollment Per Class Per Period
P1
P2
Annual
8/20-‐
9/12
9/15-‐
10/10
10/13-‐
11/7
11/10-‐
12/5
12/8-‐
1/16
1/19-‐
2/13
2/16-‐
3/13
3/16-‐
4/10
4/13-‐
5/8
5/11-‐
6/5
Period
1
Period
2
Period
3
Period
4
Period
5
Period
6
Period
7
Period
8
Period
9
Period
10
TK -‐ MAR
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
TK-‐RRT
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
K -‐ MAR
16
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
K -‐RRT
21
21
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
1st -‐ AR
32
32
32
32
31
31
31
30
30
30
2nd -‐ AI
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
3rd -‐ JM
32
32
32
32
31
32
32
32
32
32
4th -‐ LW
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
5th -‐ TL
26
26
26
27
27
28
28
28
28
27
6th -‐ LB
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
7th -‐ GM
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
8th -‐ HS
28
28
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
total
286
285
285
287
285
287
287
287
287
286
2013-‐14
Enrollment Per Class Per Period
P1
P2
Annual
8/21-‐
9/13
9/16-‐
10/11
10/14-‐
11/8
11/11-‐
12/6
12/9-‐
1/17
1/20-‐
2/14
2/17-‐
3/14
3/17-‐
4/11
4/14-‐
5/9
5/12-‐
6/6
Period
1
Period
2
Period
3
Period
4
Period
5
Period
6
Period
7
Period
8
Period
9
Period
10
K -‐ MAR
22
21
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
21
K -‐RRT
21
22
21
21
21
22
21
21
21
21
1st -‐ AH
31
32
32
32
31
32
32
32
32
32
2nd -‐ JM
29
29
29
30
30
30
31
32
32
32
3rd -‐ LW
31
31
30
30
29
30
30
30
30
30
4th -‐ TL
27
28
28
28
28
29
29
28
27
26
5th -‐ LB
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
6th -‐ GM
31
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
7th -‐ HS
29
29
28
28
28
28
27
27
27
27
8th -‐ AB
18
18
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
15
LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL
Independent Study (I.S.) Tracking
6/11/15
2014-‐15
I.S. Days Per Class Per Period
Period
1
Period
2
Period
3
Period
4
Period
5
Period
6
Period
7
Period
8
Period
9
Period
10
Total
K-‐MAR (TK)
0
4
2
4
7
0
5
9
1
1
K-‐RRT (TK)
4
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
K -‐ MAR
25
11
7
4
12
8
12
13
5
11
K -‐ RRT
3
6
12
8
3
16
9
2
8
3
70
total
32
21
21
16
22
24
31
24
14
15
220
1st -‐ AR
13
11
7
6
12
13
14
4
5
5
90
2nd -‐ AI
18
15
15
11
6
13
8
8
2
7
103
3rd -‐ JM
16
10
9
13
11
12
9
2
10
10
102
4th -‐ LW
17
4
10
11
11
22
4
5
0
0
84
5th -‐ TL
6
15
6
9
7
5
5
2
18
9
82
6th -‐ LB
13
0
4
1
5
7
1
9
2
1
43
7th -‐ GM
13
3
6
10
1
2
3
9
0
5
52
8th -‐ HS
2
12
12
5
6
0
0
2
6
0
45
total
98
70
69
66
59
74
44
41
43
37
601
All School Total
130
91
90
82
81
98
75
65
57
52
821
~$34 per day
$4,420
$3,094
$3,060
$2,788
$2,754 $3,332
$2,550
$2,210
$1,938 $1,768
$27,914
2013-‐14
I.S. Days Per Class Per Period
Period
1
Period
2
Period
3
Period
4
Period
5
Period
6
Period
7
Period
8
Period
9
Period
10
Total
K -‐ MAR
0
11
10
7
26
8
7
4
8
9
90
K -‐ RRT
6
8
4
9
4
12
8
3
5
7
66
total
6
19
14
16
30
20
15
7
13
16
156
1st -‐ AH
13
7
14
13
21
14
17
3
8
11
121
2nd -‐ JM
3
6
16
10
6
30
12
15
15
10
123
3rd -‐ LW
17
22
13
7
13
9
26
10
3
8
128
4th -‐ TL
6
9
7
3
7
1
8
5
8
5
59
5th -‐ LB
14
3
7
21
22
8
6
7
6
2
96
6th -‐ GM
7
15
0
6
4
3
0
5
18
4
62
7th -‐ HS
7
4
8
1
2
7
20
0
5
17
71
8th -‐ AB
6
3
3
4
4
7
2
1
9
0
39
total
73
69
68
65
79
79
91
46
72
57
699
All School Total
79
88
82
81
109
99
106
53
85
73
855
~$34 per day
$2,686
$2,992
$2,788
$2,754
$3,706 $3,366
$3,604
$1,802
$2,890 $2,482
$29,070
n
INTRODUCTION
LIVE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL
Matthew Morgan, Executive Director
[email protected]
(707) 762-9020
LCAP Year: 2015-2016
Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template
The Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) and Annual Update Template shall be used to provide details regarding local educational agencies’ (LEAs) actions and expenditures to support pupil outcomes and overall performance pursuant to Education Code sections 52060, 52066, 47605, 47605.5, and 47606.5. The LCAP and Annual Update Template must be completed by all LEAs each year.
For school districts, pursuant to Education Code section 52060, the LCAP must describe, for the school district and each school within the district, goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, for each of the state priorities and any locally identified priorities.
For county offices of education, pursuant to Education Code section 52066, the LCAP must describe, for each county office of education-operated school and program, goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, who are funded through the county office of education Local Control Funding Formula as identified in Education Code section 2574 (pupils attending juvenile court schools, on probation or parole, or mandatorily expelled) for each of the state priorities and any locally identified priorities. School districts and county offices of education may additionally coordinate and describe in their LCAPs services provided to pupils funded by a school district but attending county-operated schools and programs, including special education programs.
Charter schools, pursuant to Education Code sections 47605, 47605.5, and 47606.5, must describe goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, for each of the state priorities as applicable and any locally identified priorities. For charter schools, the inclusion and description of goals for state priorities in the LCAP may be modified to meet the grade levels served and the nature of the programs provided, including modifications to reflect only the statutory requirements explicitly applicable to charter schools in the Education Code.
The LCAP is intended to be a comprehensive planning tool. Accordingly, in developing goals, specific actions, and expenditures, LEAs should carefully consider how to reflect the services and related expenses for their basic instructional program in relationship to the state priorities. LEAs may reference and describe actions and expenditures in other plans and funded by a variety of other fund sources when detailing goals, actions, and expenditures related to the state and local priorities. LCAPs must be consistent with school plans submitted pursuant to Education Code section 64001. The information contained in the LCAP, or annual update, may be supplemented by information contained in other plans(including the LEA plan pursuant to Section 1112 of Subpart 1 of Part A of Title I of Public Law 107-110) that are incorporated or referenced as relevant in this document.
For each section of the template, LEAs shall comply with instructions and should use the guiding questions as prompts (but not limits) for completing the information as required by statute. Guiding questions do not require separate narrative responses. However, the narrative response and goals and actions should demonstrate each guiding question was considered during the development of the plan. Data referenced in the LCAP must be consistent with the school accountability report card where appropriate. LEAs may resize pages or attach additional pages as necessary to facilitate completion of the LCAP.
n
STATE PRIORITIES
The state priorities listed in Education Code sections 52060 and 52066 can be categorized as specified below for planning purposes, however, school districts and county offices of
education must address each of the state priorities in their LCAP. Charter schools must address the priorities in Education Code section 52060(d) that apply to the grade levels served, or
the nature of the program operated, by the charter school.
Basic:
degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned pursuant to Education Code section 44258.9, and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they are teaching;
pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials pursuant to Education Code section 60119; and school facilities are maintained in good repair pursuant to Education Code
section 17002(d). (Priority 1)
Implementation of State Standards:
implementation of academic content and performance standards and English language development standards adopted by the state board for all
pupils, including English learners. (Priority 2)
Course access:
pupil enrollment in a broad course of study that includes all of the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of
Section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 7)
Expelled pupils (for county offices of education only):
coordination of instruction of expelled pupils pursuant to Education Code section 48926. (Priority 9)
Foster youth (for county offices of education only):
coordination of services, including working with the county child welfare agency to share information, responding to the needs of the
juvenile court system, and ensuring transfer of health and education records. (Priority 10)
B. Pupil Outcomes:
Pupil achievement:
performance on standardized tests, score on Academic Performance Index, share of pupils that are college and career ready, share of English learners that become
English proficient, English learner reclassification rate, share of pupils that pass Advanced Placement exams with 3 or higher, share of pupils determined prepared for college by the Early
Assessment Program. (Priority 4)
Other pupil outcomes:
pupil outcomes in the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of Education Code section 51220, as
applicable. (Priority 8)
C. Engagement:
Parental involvement:
efforts to seek parent input in decision making at the district and each schoolsite, promotion of parent participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special
need subgroups. (Priority 3)
Pupil engagement:
school attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, high school graduations rates. (Priority 5)
School climate:
pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, parents and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness.
(Priority 6)
n
SECTION 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Meaningful engagement of parents, pupils, and other stakeholders, including those representing the subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052, is critical to
the LCAP and budget process. Education Code sections 52060(g), 52062 and 52063 specify the minimum requirements for school districts; Education Code sections
52066(g), 52068 and 52069 specify the minimum requirements for county offices of education, and Education Code section 47606.5 specifies the minimum
requirements for charter schools. In addition, Education Code section 48985 specifies the requirements for translation of documents.
Instructions:
Describe the process used to consult with parents, pupils, school personnel, local bargaining units as applicable, and the community and how this
consultation contributed to development of the LCAP or annual update. Note that the LEA’s goals, actions, services and expenditures related to the state priority of
parental involvement are to be described separately in Section 2. In the annual update boxes, describe the stakeholder involvement process for the review, and
describe its impact on, the development of the annual update to LCAP goals, actions, services, and expenditures.
1) How have applicable stakeholders (e.g., parents and pupils, including parents of unduplicated pupils and unduplicated pupils identified in Education Code
section 42238.01; community members; local bargaining units; LEA personnel; county child welfare agencies; county office of education foster youth services
programs, court-appointed special advocates, and other foster youth stakeholders; community organizations representing English learners; and others as
appropriate) been engaged and involved in developing, reviewing, and supporting implementation of the LCAP?
2) How have stakeholders been included in the LEA’s process in a timely manner to allow for engagement in the development of the LCAP?
3) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and used by the LEA to
inform the LCAP goal setting process? How was the information made available?
4) What changes, if any, were made in the LCAP prior to adoption as a result of written comments or other feedback received by the LEA through any of the
LEA’s engagement processes?
5) What specific actions were taken to meet statutory requirements for stakeholder engagement pursuant to Education Code sections 52062, 52068, and
47606.5, including engagement with representatives of parents and guardians of pupils
identified in Education Code section 42238.01?
6) What specific actions were taken to consult with pupils to meet the requirements 5 CCR 15495(a)?
7) How has stakeholder involvement been continued and supported? How has the involvement of these stakeholders supported improved outcomes for pupils,
including unduplicated pupils,
related to the state priorities?
n
SECTION 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (continued)
Involvement Process
Impact on LCAP
A.
February 9, 2015 Parent Survey
B.
April 13, 2015 Teacher Survey
C.
April 13, 2015 Student Survey (Middle School)
D.
May 8, 2015 LCAP Community Forum LCAP Proposal (2015-2016)
Introduction
E.
May 14, 2015 Public Hearing and LCAP Discussion
F.
June 11, 2015 LCAP Discussion and Adoption
A.
Determined parent satisfaction with student progress,
curriculum and school culture.
B.
Identify responses from current year LCAP implementation
actions and assess teacher needs to direct modifications to the
plan for 15/16. Also identify big picture mission goals and
objectives
C.
Identify student perspectives on areas of improvement needed
at the school, in particular, trying to identify areas of need that
more significantly impact low income/second language learner
populations.
D.
Review the 14/15 goals and progress. Introduce proposed LCAP
objectives, brainstorm additional items and receive responses
to assist in prioritizing.
E.
Introduction of formal proposal for 2015-2016 LCAP after
refinement form previous community forum. Receive formal
comment on the LCAP, provide board discussion for further
refinement.
Annual Update:
A.
April 9, 2015: LCAP 2014-2015 Review with Board
B.
April 16, 2015: LCAP 2014-2015 Review with Faculty
C.
May 8, 2015: LCAP 2014-2015 Review with Parents
Annual Update:
A.
Gather feedback on implementation of 14/15 LCAP, identify
areas of strength and weakness, measure progress.
B.
Gather feedback on implementation of 14/15 LCAP, identify
areas of strength and weakness, measure progress.
C.
Gather feedback on implementation of 14/15 LCAP, identify
areas of strength and weakness, measure progress.
n
SECTION 2: GOALS, ACTIONS, EXPENDITURES, AND PROGRESS INDICATORS
Instructions:
All LEAs must complete the LCAP and Annual Update Template each year. The LCAP is a three-year plan for the upcoming school year and the two
years that follow. In this way, the program and goals contained in the LCAP align with the term of a school district and county office of education budget and
multiyear budget projections. The Annual Update section of the template reviews progress made for each stated goal
in
the school year that is coming to a close,
assesses the effectiveness of actions and services provided, and describes the changes made in the LCAP for the next three years that are based on this review and
assessment.
Charter schools may adjust the table below to align with the term of the charter school’s budget that is submitted to the school’s authorizer pursuant to Education Code
section 47604.33.
For school districts, Education Code sections 52060 and 52061, for county offices of education, Education Code sections 52066 and 52067, and for charter schools,
Education Code section 47606.5 require(s) the LCAP to include a description of the annual goals, for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils, to be achieved for each
state priority as defined in 5 CCR 15495(i) and any local priorities; a description of the specific actions an LEA will take to meet the identified goals; a description of the
expenditures required to implement the specific actions; and an annual update to include a review of progress towards the goals and describe any changes to the
goals.
To facilitate alignment between the LCAP and school plans, the LCAP shall identify and incorporate school-specific goals related to the state and local priorities from
the school plans submitted pursuant to Education Code section 64001. Furthermore, the LCAP should be shared with, and input requested from, schoolsite-level
advisory groups, as applicable (e.g., schoolsite councils, English Learner Advisory Councils, pupil advisory groups, etc.) to facilitate alignment between school-site and
district-level goals and actions. An LEA may incorporate or reference actions described in other plans that are being undertaken to meet the goal.
Using the following instructions and guiding questions, complete a goal table (see below) for each of the LEA’s goals. Duplicate and expand the fields as necessary.
When completing the goal tables, include goals for all pupils
and specific goals for schoolsites and specific subgroups, including pupils with disabilities, both
at the LEA level and, where applicable, at the schoolsite level. The LEA may identify which schoolsites and subgroups have the same goals, and group and
describe those goals together. The LEA may also indicate those goals that are not applicable to a specific subgroup or schoolsite.
Related State and/or Local Priorities:
Identify the state and/or local priorities addressed by the goal by placing a check mark next to the applicable priority or priorities.
The LCAP must include goals that address each of the state priorities, as defined in 5 CCR 15495(i), and any additional local priorities; however, one goal may address
multiple priorities.
Identified Need:
Describe the need(s) identified by the LEA that this goal addresses, including a description of the supporting data used to identify the need(s).
Schools:
Identify the schoolsites to which the goal applies. LEAs may indicate “all” for all schools, specify an individual school or a subset of schools, or specify grade
spans (e.g., all high schools or grades K-5).
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
Identify the pupil subgroups as defined in Education Code section 52052 to which the goal applies, or indicate “all” for all pupils.
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes
: For each LCAP year, identify and describe specific expected measurable outcomes for all pupils using, at minimum, the
applicable required metrics for the related state priorities. Where applicable, include descriptions of specific expected measurable outcomes for schoolsites and
specific subgroups, including pupils with disabilities, both at the LEA level and at the schoolsite level.
The metrics used to describe the expected measurable outcomes may be quantitative or qualitative, although the goal tables must address all required metrics
for every state priority in each LCAP year. The required metrics are the specified measures and objectives for each state priority as set forth in Education Code
sections 52060(d) and 52066(d). For the pupil engagement priority metrics, LEAs must calculate the rates specified in Education Code sections 52060(d)(5)(B),
(C), (D) and (E) as described in the Local Control Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template Appendix, sections (a) through (d).
Actions/Services:
For each LCAP year, identify all annual actions to be performed and services provided to meet the described goal. Actions may describe a group of
services that are implemented to achieve the identified goal.
Scope of Service:
Describe the scope of each action/service by identifying the schoolsites covered. LEAs may indicate “all” for all schools, specify an individual school
or a subset of schools, or specify grade spans (e.g., all high schools or grades K-5). If supplemental and concentration funds are used to support the action/service, the
LEA must identify if the scope of service is districtwide, schoolwide, countywide, or charterwide.
Pupils to be served within identified scope of service
: For each action/service, identify the pupils to be served within the identified scope of service. If the action to be
performed or the service to be provided is for all pupils, place a check mark next to “ALL.”
Budgeted Expenditures:
For each action/service, list and describe budgeted expenditures for each school year to implement these actions, including where those
expenditures can be found in the LEA’s budget. The LEA must reference all fund sources for each proposed expenditure. Expenditures must be classified using the
California School Accounting Manual as required by Education Code sections 52061, 52067, and 47606.5.
Guiding Questions:
1) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address state priorities related to “Conditions of Learning”?
2) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address state priorities related to “Pupil Outcomes”?
3) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address state priorities related to parent and pupil “Engagement” (e.g., parent involvement, pupil engagement, and school
climate)?
4) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address any locally-identified priorities?
5) How have the unique needs of individual schoolsites been evaluated to inform the development of meaningful district and/or individual schoolsite goals (e.g.,
input from site level advisory groups, staff, parents, community, pupils; review of school level plans; in-depth school level data analysis, etc.)?
6) What are the unique goals for unduplicated pupils as defined in Education Code sections 42238.01 and subgroups as defined in section 52052 that are
different from the LEA’s goals for all pupils?
7) What are the specific expected measurable outcomes associated with each of the goals annually and over the term of the LCAP?
8) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was considered/reviewed to develop goals to address each state or local priority?
9) What information was considered/reviewed for individual schoolsites?
10) What information was considered/reviewed for subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052?
11) What actions/services will be provided to all pupils, to subgroups of pupils identified pursuant to Education Code section 52052, to specific schoolsites, to
English learners, to low-income pupils, and/or to foster youth to achieve goals identified in the LCAP?
12) How do these actions/services link to identified goals and expected measurable outcomes?
GOAL:
1. All teachers will be appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the
students they are teaching, ensuring Highly Qualified Teacher (HQT) status.
Related State and/or Local Priorities:
1_X_ 2_X_ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__ COE only: 9__ 10__
Local : Specify _____________________
Identified Need:
To have all teachers appropriately assigned and fully credentialed
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
Live Oak Charter School
All Students
LCAP Year 1:
2015-2016
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: All students will receive core academic subject area instruction by appropriately assigned and credentialed teachers.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Professional Development towards Credential, Waldorf Certification,
and Grade Level Competency School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
__Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $6000 (FUNC 5200)
Release time/Per Diem for participation in Professional development
activities School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
__Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $10000 (FUNC 1000) LCAP Year 2: 2016-2017
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: All students will receive core academic subject area instruction by appropriately assigned and credentialed teachers.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Actions/Services Scope of Service
Professional Development towards Credential, Waldorf Certification,
and Grade Level Competency School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
__Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $6000 (FUNC 5200)
Release time/Per Diem for participation in Professional development
activities School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $10000 (FUNC 1000) LCAP Year 3: 2017-2018
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: All students will receive core academic subject area instruction by appropriately assigned and credentialed teachers.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Actions/Services Scope of Service
Professional Development towards Credential, Waldorf Certification,
and Grade Level Competency School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $6000 (FUNC 5200)
Release time/Per Diem for participation in Professional development
activities School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
GOAL:
2. Improve Reading Achievement through phonics-based classroom instruction, leveled reading system
and assessment process, professional development for staff and mentoring support throughout
implementation
Related State and/or Local Priorities:
1__ 2_X_ 3__ 4_X_ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__ COE only: 9__ 10__
Local : Specify _____________________
Identified Need:
For students to read with competency and comprehension
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
Live Oak Charter School
All Students
LCAP Year 1:
2015-2016
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes:
Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of RTI student development showing annual progress, F&P progress trends class-wide. Reduced RTI Rate school wide, caseload analysis. Improved QRI/Core Phonics/Fountas and Pinnell Assessments for 3rd grade, Improved Parent/Teacher reports
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Purchase curriculum, resources & materials: Fountas and Pinnell
Assessments Package, Library resources School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL
$1500 (FUNC 4210) $250 (FUNC 4210) Employ Reading Specialist for mentoring support + Provide release time
through Prep Staffing School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $6000 (FUNC 2199-3000) $5000 (FUNC 2199-3000) Linda Mood Bell Reading Training School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $2800 (FUNC 5200)
LCAP Year 2
: 2016-2017
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes:
Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of RTI student development showing annual progress, F&P progress trends class-wide. Reduced RTI Rate school wide, caseload analysis. Improved QRI/Core Phonics/Fountas and Pinnell Assessments for 3rd grade, Improved Parent/Teacher reports
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Purchase curriculum, resources & materials: Fountas and Pinnell
Assessments Package, Library resources School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL
$750 (FUNC 4210) $3000 (FUNC 4210) Employ Reading Specialist for mentoring support + Provide release time
through Prep Staffing School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $6000 (FUNC 2199-3000) $5000 (FUNC 2199-3000) Linda Mood Bell Reading Training School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $2,800 (FUNC 5200)
LCAP Year 3
: 2017-2018
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of RTI student development showing annual progress, F&P progress trends class-wide. Reduced RTI Rate school wide, caseload analysis. Improved QRI/Core Phonics/Fountas and Pinnell Assessments for 3rd grade, Improved Parent/Teacher reports
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Expand Curriculum and Library resources for leveled reading School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $3000 (FUNC 4210) Employ Reading Specialist for mentoring support + Provide release time
through Prep Staffing School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL
GOAL:
3. Improve writing achievement through articulated curriculum & instruction related to thinking maps and
the writing process
Related State and/or Local Priorities:
1__ 2_X_ 3__ 4_X_ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__ COE only: 9__ 10__
Local : Specify _____________________
Identified Need:
To have all teachers appropriately assigned and fully credentialed
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
Live Oak Charter School
All Students
LCAP Year 1:
2015-2016
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measure, benchmark trends per class.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Purchase Thinking Maps graphic organizer curriculum materials
School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
__Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $3000 (FUNC 4210)
Professional Development Training for Implementation of Thinking Maps School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $2600 (FUNC 5200)
LCAP Year 2
: 2016-2017
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measure, benchmark trends per class.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Purchase Write to the Point curriculum materials School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ __ALL $3000 (FUNC 4210) Professional Development for Implementation of Thinking Maps & Write
to the Point School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ __ALL $2600 (FUNC 5200)
LCAP Year 3
: 2017-2018
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measure, benchmark trends per class.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Update Materials for Writing Program School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ __ALL $3000 (FUNC 4210) Professional Development for Implementation of Thinking Maps & Write
to the Point School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
GOAL:
4. Improve Math Foundations achievement through developmentally articulated math instruction and
materials in the elementary grades
Related State and/or Local Priorities: 1__ 2_X_ 3__ 4_X_ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__ COE only: 9__ 10__
Local : Specify _____________________
Identified Need:
To have all teachers appropriately assigned and fully credentialed
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
Live Oak Charter School
All Students
LCAP Year 1:
2015-2016
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of student development showing annual progress, Benchmark measures by grade.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Professional Development Training for Making Math Real School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $7500 (FUNC 5200)
Purchase Math manipulatives and resources School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $1000 (FUNC 4310)
LCAP Year 2
: 2016-2017
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of student development showing annual progress, Benchmark measures by grade.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Professional Development Training for Making Math Real School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $7500 (FUNC 5200)
Purchase Math manipulatives and resources School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $1000 (FUNC 4310)
LCAP Year 3
: 2017-2018
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of student development showing annual progress, Benchmark measures by grade.
Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures
Professional Development Training for Making Math Real
School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
__Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $7500 (FUNC 5200)
GOAL:
5. Ensure students operating below grade level expectations have needs met through collaborative RTI
learning supports
Related State and/or Local Priorities:
1_X_ 2__ 3__ 4_X_ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__ COE only: 9__ 10__
Local : Specify _____________________
Identified Need:
Identify and remediate students who demonstrate delayed academic progress
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
Live Oak Charter School
All Students
LCAP Year 1:
2015-2016
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes:
Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of student development showing annual progress, F&P progress trends class-wide. Reduced RTI Rate school wide, caseload analysis. Improved QRI/Core Phonics Assessments, Improved Parent/Teacher reports
Actions/Services Scope of Service Actions/Services Budgeted Expenditures
Provide Learning Support Staff for students identified in need of support School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $20000 (FUNC 2000-3000)
Purchase Learning Materials for support providers School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $1500 (FUNC 4310)
LCAP Year 2
: 2016-2017
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of student development showing annual progress, F&P progress trends class-wide. Reduced RTI Rate school wide, caseload analysis. Improved QRI/Core Phonics Assessments, Improved Parent/Teacher reports
Actions/Services Scope of Service Actions/Services Budgeted Expenditures
Provide Learning Support Staff for students identified in need of support
School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
__Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $20000 (FUNC 2000-3000)
Purchase Learning Materials for support providers School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $1500 (FUNC 4310)
LCAP Year 3
: 2017-2018
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes:
Improvement in students proficient or advanced on CAASPP, Longitudinal measures of student development showing annual progress, F&P progress trends class-wide. Reduced RTI Rate school wide, caseload analysis. Improved QRI/Core Phonics Assessments, Improved Parent/Teacher reports
Actions/Services Scope of Service Actions/Services Scope of Service
Provide Learning Support Staff for students identified in need of support School Wide __Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP __Other Subgroups: (Specify)_______________ _X_ALL $20000 (FUNC 2000-3000)
Purchase Learning Materials for support providers
School Wide
__Low Income Pupils __EL __Foster Youth __Re-designated FEP
