• No results found

The Obesity Explosion: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We At?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Obesity Explosion: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We At?"

Copied!
70
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The Obesity Explosion:

How Did We Get Here and Where Are We At?

Donald D. Hensrud, M.D., M.P.H.

Chair, Division of Preventive, Occupational, and Aerospace Medicine

Associate Professor of Preventive Medicine and Nutrition

(2)

©2012 MFMER | slide-2

Disclosure

Relevant financial relationships

• None

Off label usage

• None

(3)

©2012 MFMER | slide-3

Learning Objective

• Describe background information on obesity including

• Classification

• Prevalence and trends

• Contributing factors

• Health complications

• Treatment

• Diet

• Physical activity

• Behavior change

• Medications

• Surgery

(4)

©2012 MFMER | slide-4

(5)

©2011 MFMER |

Obesity

Obesity (def) - an excess of body fat resulting in

adverse health effects

(6)

©2012 MFMER | slide-6

©2011 MFMER | 3142097-6

Obesity,

Risk Assessment and Classification

Adapted from Clinical guidelines on Obesity. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Web site.

Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_home.htm

Disease Risk Relative to Normal Weight and Waist Circumference

Men 40 in Men >40in Category BMI, kg/m

2

Women 35 in Women >35 in

Underweight <18.5 – –

Normal* 18.5-24.9 – –

Overweight 25.0-29.99 Increased High

Obesity 30.0-39.9 High Very high

35.0-39.9 Very high Very high Extreme obesity 40 Extremely high Extremely high

* An increased waist circumference can denote increased disease risk even

in persons of normal weight

(7)

Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1990

No Data <10% 10%–14%

(8)

©2012 MFMER | slide-8

Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 2000

No Data <10% 10%–14 15%–19% ≥20%

(9)

Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 2010

No Data <10% 10%–14 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30%

(10)

©2012 MFMER | slide-10

Global Obesity

• Obesity around the world has doubled since 1980

• Overweight and obesity are linked to more deaths worldwide than underweight

• Overweight and obesity are the fifth leading risk for global deaths

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

97-10

(11)

©2012 MFMER | slide-11

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(12)

©2012 MFMER | slide-12

©2011 MFMER | 3142097-12

Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity, NHANES 2009-2010

All (%) Men (%) Women (%)

 Overweight 68.8 73.9 63.7

Obese 35.7 35.5 35.8

Extreme obese 6.3 4.4 8.1

JAMA 2012;307:491

(13)

©2011 MFMER |

Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity, NHANES 2009-2010

JAMA 2012;307:491 All White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic

Overweight

33.1 37.8 31.1 44.7 27.3 23.6 34.3 BMI 25-29.9

Obese

35.7 36.2 38.8 37.0 32.2 58.5 41.4

BMI 30

Extreme obese

6.3 4.2 7.4 4.1 7.1 17.8 6.0 BMI 40

Men Women

(14)

©2012 MFMER | slide-14

©2011 MFMER | 3142097-14

Obesity, Health Complications

• Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

• Hypertension

• Dyslipidemia

• High triglycerides

• Low HDL cholesterol

• Small, dense LDL cholesterol

• Coronary artery disease

• Stroke

• Overall mortality

(15)

©2011 MFMER |

Obesity, Health Complications

• Most cancers

• Respiratory diseases

• Obstructive sleep apnea

• Restrictive lung disease

• Obesity hypoventilation syndrome

• Asthma

• Osteoarthritis

• Cholelithiasis

• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

(16)

©2012 MFMER | slide-16

©2011 MFMER | 3142097-16

Obesity, Health Complications

• Gynecologic abnormalities

• Abnormal menses

• Infertility

• Polycystic ovarian syndrome

• Venous stasis

• Skin problems

• Intertrigo

• Cellulitis

• Increased risk of complications during surgery

or pregnancy

(17)

©2011 MFMER |

Societal Cost of Overweight and Obesity

Data from Dor A et al:George Wash Univ, 2010 and

1Health Affairs 2009;28:w822; 2Int J Obes 2005;29:334

3Obes 2008;16:2323; 4National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010

Study Year Overweight Obesity

Finkelstein 1 1998 76.5

Arterburn 2 2000 24.8 55.9

Wang 3 2000 27.4-29.7 76.6-87.7

Finkelstein 1 2008 151.7 (147)

Cawley 4 2010 168.4

Cost in $ billions/yr*

*2009 dollars

(18)

©2012 MFMER | slide-18

©2011 MFMER | 3142097-18

Individual Yearly Costs of Obesity

Men, $ Women, $

Overweight 432 524

Obese 2,646 4,879

Obese + VLL 6,518 8,365

(value of life lost)

Dor A et al: George Wash Univ, 2010

• Direct and indirect costs (disability, decreased productivity, absenteeism, etc.)

• Direct medical costs largest % for overweight

• Lost wages largest % for obese women

(19)

©2011 MFMER |

Obesity Costs, Who Pays?

• Medicare and Medicaid pay about half of all costs 1

• Business paid an estimated $12.7 billion in 1994 (5% of total medical care costs) 2

• Cost of obesity among full-time employees estimated to be $73 billion in 2006-2008 in a recent study 3

1Health Affairs 2009;28:w822; 2Am J Health Prom 1998;13:120

3J Occup Environ Med 2010;52:971

(20)

©2012 MFMER | slide-20

Pathogenesis of Obesity

• Genetics vs. environment

• 30% - 40% of variance related to genetics

• Environment

• Diet/energy intake

• Physical activity

• Exercise

• Daily activities

• Individual factors

(21)

©2011 MFMER |

(22)

©2012 MFMER | slide-22

©2011 MFMER | 3142097-22

(23)

©2012 MFMER | slide-23

Management Plan

• Diet

• Physical activity

• Exercise

• Daily activities

• Behavior change

• Medications

• Surgery

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

*Use the assessment and history to tailor the plan

(24)

©2012 MFMER | slide-24

Individualized Weight Loss

• Hundreds of different influences

• Diet

• Physical activity

• Behavior

• Everyone has different obstacles

• Everyone’s plan should have tailored strategies

• Mayo Clinic Diet – Action Guide

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

97-24

(25)

©2012 MFMER | slide-25

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(26)

©2012 MFMER | slide-26

Weight Loss, Diet

• Diet

• There is no one best diet

• Tailor the dietary program to the individual

• Minimum dietary standards

• Sound scientific rationale

• Safe and nutritionally adequate

• Practical and effective long-term

(27)

©2012 MFMER | slide-27

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(28)

©2012 MFMER | slide-28

Dietary Therapy, AHA/ACC/TOS Recommendations

• Calorie deficit of 500 - 750 kcal/day

• Promotes weight loss of 1 - 2 pounds/week

• Low CD

• 1,200 - 1,500 kcal/day for women

• 1,500 - 1,800 kcal/day for men

• Choose a diet based on patient preferences

• 3-5% weight loss leads to clinical benefit

(29)

Weight Loss, Different Macronutrient Composition

• 811 overweight adults, 2 years

• Group and individual instructions

• 4 reduced calorie diets:

NEJM 2009;360:859

Fat Protein Carbohydrates

20 15 65

20 25 55

40 15 45

40 25 35

(30)

©2012 MFMER | slide-30

Weight Loss, Different Macronutrient Composition

-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

0 6 12 18 24

W ei ght lo ss (k g)

Months

NEJM 2009;360:859

65/15/20%

55/25/20%

45/15/40%

35/25/40%

(31)

©2012 MFMER | slide-31

Weight Loss, Different Macronutrient Composition

• 80% completed 2 years

• Most weight loss occurred by 6 months (6 kg)

• No significant differences among groups in weight loss or cardiovascular risk factors

• Mean weight loss among all participants 4 kg at 2 years

• Attendance at group sessions was strongly associated with weight loss

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(32)

©2012 MFMER | slide-32

Methods of Calorie Restriction

• Counting calories

(33)

Discrepancy Between Reported and Actual Energy Intake and Expenditure

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Reported Actual Reported Actual

*

*

Lichtman et al: N Engl J Med 1992;327:1893

kc al /d

Energy Intake Energy Expenditure

*P<0.05 vs reported

(34)

©2012 MFMER | slide-34

Methods of Calorie Restriction

• Counting calories

• Counting fat grams

• Point system

• Exchange system

• Moderation of portion size, types of foods, etc.

• Very-low calorie diets

• Liquid meal replacements

• Energy density

(35)
(36)

©2012 MFMER | slide-36

(37)
(38)

©2012 MFMER | slide-38

(39)
(40)

©2012 MFMER | slide-40

(41)
(42)

©2012 MFMER | slide-42

(43)

Fruits & Vegetables and Weight Gain

• 74,000 females followed for 12 years in the Nurses’ Health Study

• Those with the largest increase in intake of

fruits and vegetables had a 24% decreased risk of becoming obese

Int J Obes 2004;28:269

(44)

©2012 MFMER | slide-44

Dietary Changes and Weight Changes

Dietary Change Weight Change, lb

Potato chips 1.69

Potatoes 1.28

Sugar-sweetened drinks 1.00

Unprocessed red meat 0.95

Processed meat 0.93

Vegetables -0.22

Whole grains -0.37

Fruits -0.49

Nuts -0.57

Yogurt -0.82

NEJM 2011;364:25

(45)

Mayo Clinic Healthy Weight Pyramid

(46)

©2012 MFMER | slide-46

Determinants of What We Eat

Objective

• Evidence from scientific studies

Subjective

• Cost

• Convenience

• Time

• Food availability

• What we grew up eating

• Taste preferences

• Marketing

• Ethnicity

• Social influences

(47)

©2012 MFMER | slide-47

Healthful Dietary Change

• Attitude

• People underestimate their ability to change

• Eating healthy vs. eating well

• Lifestyle

• Practical

• Palatable

• Promote satiety

• Low in calories

• Healthy

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(48)

©2012 MFMER | slide-48

(49)
(50)

©2012 MFMER | slide-50

Physical Activity, Recommendations

• 150 min/week of moderate-intensity physical activity (e.g., brisk walking)

• 75 min/week of vigorous intensity physical activity (e.g., jogging or running)

• To effectively lose or maintain weight, may need 300 min/week of moderate-intensity physical

activity

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

97-50

http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/guidelines/adults.html

(51)

©2012 MFMER | slide-51

Exercise

• Exercise vs daily activities

• Pick an exercise that:

• Is enjoyable

• Can be performed regularly

• Can be continued indefinitely

• Frequency, duration, intensity

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(52)

©2012 MFMER | slide-52

Obesity, Fitness, and Mortality

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

97-52

Lee CD: AM J Clin Nutr 1999; 69:373 0.0

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Lean Normal Obese

Adj us ted RR

Body Fat (%)

Fit Unfit

(<16.7) (>25)

(53)

©2012 MFMER | slide-53

Daily Activities

• Human nature - conserve energy and decrease activity

• Years ago – survival advantage

• Now – shortens survival

• Different mindset – look for opportunities to obtain increased activity

• Burn calories

• Feel better

• Improve health

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(54)

©2012 MFMER | slide-54

Daily Activities

• Take the long way around

• Choose outdoor vacations/activities

• Avoid using children to do tasks (don’t let them get all the benefits)

• Walk whenever you can

• Stairs, park farther away

• Around the office

• Airports (don’t use the moving walkway)

• Consider a pedometer

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

97-54

(55)

©2012 MFMER | slide-55

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

Television Time and Health

• Each 2 hours of TV time increases the risk of:

• Type 2 diabetes by 20%

• Cardiovascular disease by 15%

• All-cause mortality by 13%

• Studies reported similar results after controlling for exercise

©2011 MFMER | 3135329-55

JAMA 2011;305:2448

(56)

©2012 MFMER | slide-56

(57)

Weight Loss Strategies

• Determine general goals (health, weight, etc.)

• Determine obstacles and tailor the approach to address obstacles

• Have specific plans, and plan ahead

• Provide suggestions and motivation

• Provide educational information (online, print, etc.)

• Consider commercial programs for

partnering/follow-up (weight, coaching)

• Individualize the plan

(58)

©2012 MFMER | slide-58

Weight Loss Strategies

• Diet tracking (e.g., sparkpeople.com, myfitnesspal.com, Livestrong.com)

• Physical activity tracking (e.g., Fitbit, Omron, Gruve)

• Focus on the process (lifestyle change) and health, not the outcome (pounds)

• Use process goals - SMART

• The process can be enjoyable!

• Expect lapses – problem solving

(59)

Weight Loss, Systematic Strategies

• Stepped-care approach

• Lifestyle counseling in primary care

• Remote treatment

(60)

©2012 MFMER | slide-60

Stepped-Care Approach for Obesity

• 363 overweight and obese adults

• 18 months

• 72% follow-up

• Randomized to standard behavior therapy vs.

stepped-care

• Counseling frequency, type, and weight loss strategies modified every 3 months with

increasing intensity if goals are not made

• Weight loss: -7.5 kg std. vs. -6.3 kg stepped-care

• Cost: $1,357 std. vs. $785 stepped-care

JAMA 2012:307:2617

(61)

Lifestyle Counseling in Primary Care Treatment of Obesity

• 390 obese adults

• 2 years

• 86% follow-up

• Randomized to:

• Usual care – quarterly visits and education

• Brief lifestyle counseling with coaches

• Enhanced lifestyle counseling (meal replacements or medications)

• Weight loss: -1.7 kg, -2.9 kg, -4.6 kg, respectively

NEJM 2011;365:1969

(62)

©2012 MFMER | slide-62

In-Person vs Remote Treatment of Obesity

• 415 obese adults

• 2 years, 95% follow-up

• Randomized to in-person vs. remote intervention vs. control

• Intervention

• Coaches (in-person vs telephone)

• Web-based support

• Weight loss: -0.8 kg control, -4.6 kg remote, -5.1 in-person

NEJM 2011;365:1959

(63)
(64)

©2012 MFMER | slide-64

(65)

©2012 MFMER | slide-65

Weight Loss Medications

• Orlistat

• Phentermine

• Qsymia (phentermine/topiramate)

• Belviq (lorcaserin)

©2011 MFME

R | 31420

(66)

©2012 MFMER | slide-66

Obesity, Bariatric Surgery

• Indications

• BMI >40

• BMI >35 when complications present

• Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure of choice over vertical banded gastroplasty

• Efficacy - >50% excess weight lost after one

year (usually >100 lb) and most weight loss

maintained

(67)

Bariatric Surgery

Standard Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

(68)

©2012 MFMER | slide-68

Obesity, Bariatric Surgery

• Complications

• dumping syndrome staple line disruption

• headaches small bowel obstruction

• stomal ulcer dehydration

• iron deficiency vomiting

• vitamin B12 deficiency

• diarrhea > constipation

• hair loss (temporary)

• stenosis of gastrojejunal anastomosis

(69)

Treatment of Obesity, Success

Weight

• Weight loss

• Long-term weight maintenance

• Prevention of weight gain

• Inches lost

• Improvement in body composition Health

• Improvement in comorbidities of obesity

• Improved health habits

• Improvement in quality of life

(70)

©2012 MFMER | slide-70

References

Related documents

Our findings showed that the HLS made a large number of contextually inappropriate substitutions by using direct evidentials in places where an indirect evidential would

QS-Q9-P-ANRA-U-MC QSON ANR for Intra Freq UMTS Macro Cells; MC Lic; Perpetual QS-TH-P-ERI-U-OSS QSON OSS Interface for Ericsson UTRAN, UMTS; Perpetual QS-TH-P-HWE-U-OSS QSON

The extract of the cultured apple stem cells was shown to en- hance the viability of umbilical cord blood stem cells, to reverse senescence signs in human fibrob- last cells and

representatives from power supply manufacturers identified and defined the priorities for the server power supply test protocol, and included incorporating data center architecture,

In order to solve theses problems, first, new location reference system for the National Highways was introduced by installing kilometer posts which were designed to have

After an SAH , blood vessels near the burst aneurysm can go into spasm and prevent blood from getting to the brain. Why this happens isn’t clear, but a lack of blood can lead to

1&lt;) The bladder becomes continuous &#34;ith the lo&#34;er end of the mesonephric !=olffian) duct% &#34;hich &#34;ill form the &amp;&amp;&amp;&amp; of the bladder'. a) rethra

Using those behavioural and spatial cognitive tests, we found that Eurasian harvest mice behaved constantly and that personality traits formed a behavioural syndrome in the