• No results found

IN ITS LIE ALGEBRA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IN ITS LIE ALGEBRA"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ADJOINT ORBIT TYPES OF COMPACT EXCEPTIONAL LIE GROUP G

2

IN ITS LIE ALGEBRA

Takashi MIYASAKA

Introduction

A Lie group G naturally acts on its Lie algebra g, called the adjoint action.

In this paper, we determine the orbit types of the compact exceptional Lie group G

2

in its Lie algebra g

2

. As results, the group G

2

has four orbit types in the Lie algebra g

2

as

G

2

/G

2

, G

2

/(U (1) × U(1)), G

2

/((Sp(1) × U(1))/Z

2

), G

2

/((U (1) × Sp(1))/Z

2

).

These orbits, especially the last two orbits, are not equivalent, that is, there exists no G

2

-equivariant homeomorphism among them. Finally, the author would like to thank Professor Ichiro Yokota for his earnest guidance, useful advice and constant encouragement.

0. Preliminaries and notation

(1) For a group G and an element s of G, es denotes the inner automor- phism induced by s:

es(g) = sgs

−1

, g ∈ G,

then G

es

= {g ∈ G | sg = gs}. Hereafter G

es

is briefly written by G

s

. (2) For a transformation group G of a space M , the isotropy subgroup

of G at a point m ∈ M is denoted by G

m

: G

m

= {g ∈ G | gm = m}.

(3) As mentioned in the introduction, a Lie group G acts on its Lie algebra g. When G is a compact Lie group, any element X ∈ g is transformed to some element D of a fixed Cartan subalgebra h.

Hence, to determine the conjugate classes of isotropy subgroups G

X

, it suffices to consider the case of X = D ∈ h.

1. The Cayley algebra C and the group G

2

Let C be the division Cayley algebra with the canonical basis {e

0

= 1, e

1

, . . . , e

7

} and in C the conjugation x, the inner product (x, y) and the length |x| are naturally defined ([1], [3]). The Cayley algebra C contains

17

(2)

naturally the field R of real numbers, furthermore the field C of complex numbers and the field H of quaternion numbers:

R = {x = x1 | x ∈ R}, C = {x

0

+ x

1

e

1

| x

0

, x

1

∈ R},

H = {x

0

+ x

1

e

1

+ x

2

e

2

+ x

3

e

3

| x

0

, x

1

, x

2

, x

3

∈ R}.

The automorphism group G

2

of the Cayley algebra C:

G

2

= {α ∈ Iso

R

(C) | α(xy) = (αx)(αy)}

is the simply connected compact Lie group of type G

2

.

Any element x ∈ C can be expressed as x = a + be

4

, a, b ∈ H, and C is isomorphic to the algebra H ⊕ He

4

with multiplication

(a + be

4

)(c + de

4

) = (ac − db) + (bc + da)e

4

. We define an R-linear transformation γ of C by

γ(a + be

4

) = a − be

4

, a + be

4

∈ H ⊕ He

4

= C.

Next, to an element

x = a + m

1

e

2

+ m

2

e

4

+ m

3

e

6

, a, m

1

, m

2

, m

3

∈ C of C, we associate an element

a +

m

1

m

2

m

3

of the algebra C ⊕ C

3

with the multiplication

(a + m)(b + n) = (ab − hm, ni) + (an + bm − m × n),

where hm, ni =

t

mn and m ×n ∈ C

3

is the exterior product of m, n. Note that C ⊕ C

3

is a left C-module. Hereafter we identify C with H ⊕ He

4

and C ⊕ C

3

:

C = H ⊕ He

4

, C = C ⊕ C

3

. We define an R-linear transformation γ

c

of C by

γ

c

(a + m) = a + m, a + m ∈ C ⊕ C

3

= C.

Then, γ, γ

c

∈ G

2

, γ

2

= γ

c2

= 1 and γ, γ

c

are conjugate in G

2

([1]).

(3)

2. Subgroups (Sp(1) × Sp(1))/Z

2

and SU (3) of G

2

Proposition 1 ([3]). (G

2

)

γ

= (Sp(1)×Sp(1))/Z

2

, Z

2

= {(1, 1), (−1, −1)}.

Proof. Let Sp(1) = {p ∈ H | pp = 1} and we define a map ϕ : Sp(1) × Sp(1) → (G

2

)

γ

by

ϕ(p, q)(a + be

4

) = qaq + (pbq)e

4

, a + be

4

∈ H ⊕ He

4

= C.

ϕ is well-defined: ϕ(p, q) ∈ (G

2

)

γ

and ϕ is a homomorphism. We shall show that ϕ is onto. Let α ∈ (G

2

)

γ

. Note that

C

γ

= {x ∈ C | γx = x} = H, C

−γ

= {x ∈ C | γx = −x} = He

4

and these spaces are invariant under the action of the group (G

2

)

γ

. Now, since α ∈ (G

2

)

γ

induces an automorphism of C

γ

= H, there exists q ∈ Sp(1) such that

αa = qaq, a ∈ H.

Let β = ϕ(1, q)

−1

α. Then β ∈ (G

2

)

γ

and β |H = 1. Since β induces an endomorphism of He

4

, there exists p ∈ H such that βe

4

= pe

4

. From

|p| = |pe

4

| = |βe

4

| = |e

4

| = 1, we see that p ∈ Sp(1). Then

β(a + be

4

) = βa + (βb)(βe

4

) = a + b(pe

4

) = a + (pb)e

4

= ϕ(p, 1)(a + be

4

).

Hence, β = ϕ(p, 1) and α = ϕ(1, q)ϕ(p, 1) = ϕ(p, q) which shows that ϕ is onto. ker ϕ = {(1, 1), (−1, −1)} = Z

2

. Thus, we have (G

2

)

γ

= (Sp(1) ×

Sp(1))/Z

2

. ¤

Proposition 2 ([1], [3]). (G

2

)

e1

= SU (3).

Proof. Let SU (3) = {A ∈ M(3, C) | A

A = E, det A = 1} and we define a map ψ : SU (3) → (G

2

)

e1

by

ψ(A)(a + m) = a + Am, a + m ∈ C ⊕ C

3

= C.

ψ is well-defined: ψ(A) ∈ (G

2

)

e1

. ψ is injective and a homomorphism. We shall show that ψ is onto. Let α ∈ (G

2

)

e1

. Note that α induces a C-linear transformation of C

3

. Now let

αe

2

= a

1

, αe

4

= a

2

, αe

6

= a

3

and consider a matrix A = (a

1

, a

2

, a

3

) ∈ M(3, C). From (αe

2

)(αe

4

) = α(e

2

e

4

) = −α(e

6

), we have a

1

a

2

= −a

3

, namely, −ha

1

, a

2

i−a

1

× a

2

= −a

3

, then

ha

1

, a

2

i = 0, a

3

= a

1

× a

2

.

Similarly, we have ha

2

, a

3

i = ha

3

, a

1

i = 0. Moreover, from (αe

k

)(αe

k

) =

α(e

k

e

k

) = α( −1) = −1, we have ha

k

, a

k

i = 1, hence, A ∈ U(3) = {A ∈

M (3, C) | A

A = E }. Finally, det A = (a

3

, a

1

×a

2

) = (a

3

, a

3

) = ha

3

, a

3

i =

1 (where (a, b) is the usual inner product in C

3

: (a, b) =

t

ab). Hence, we

(4)

have A ∈ SU(3) and ψ(A) = α which shows that ψ is onto. Thus, we have

SU (3) ∼ = (G

2

)

e1

. ¤

3. Adjoint orbit types of G

2

in the Lie algebra g

2

The Lie algebra g

2

of the group G

2

is given by

g

2

= {D ∈ Hom

R

(C) | D(xy) = (Dx)y + x(Dy)}.

The adjoint action of the group G

2

on the Lie algebra g

2

is given by µ : G

2

× g

2

→ g

2

, µ(α, D) = αDα

−1

.

Now, we shall determine the adjoint orbit types of the group G

2

in g

2

. Since the group G

2

contains the subgroup SU (3) (Proposition 2), the Lie algebra g

2

also contains the subalgebra su(3) = {D ∈ M(3, C) | D

+ D = 0, tr(D) = 0 }. We choose a Cartan subalgebra h of su(3) as

h = (

D(r, s, t) =

re

1

0 0 0 se

1

0 0 0 te

1

 ¯¯

¯¯ ¯ r, s, t ∈ R, r + s + t = 0 )

,

which is also a Cartan subalgebra of g

2

. The order of r, s, t of D(r, s, t) is arbitrarily exchanged by the action of G

2

.

Note that between the induced mappings ϕ

: sp(1) ⊕ sp(1) → g

2

and ψ

: su(3) → g

2

of ϕ and ψ, there exist the following relations:

ϕ

(e

1

, 0) = ψ

(diag(0, e

1

, −e

1

)), ϕ

(0, e

1

) = ψ

(diag(2e

1

, −e

1

, −e

1

)).

Theorem 3. The orbit types in g

2

through D(r, s, t) ∈ h under the adjoint action of the group G

2

are as follows:

(1) In the case: r = s = t = 0, the orbit through D(0, 0, 0) is G

2

/G

2

.

(2) In the case: r, s, t are non-zero and distinct, the orbit through D(r, s, t) is

G

2

/(U (1) × U(1)).

(3) In the case: r is non-zero, the orbit through D(2r, −r, −r) is G

2

/((Sp(1) × U(1))/Z

2

).

(4) In the case: r is non-zero, the orbit through D(0, r, −r) is G

2

/((U (1) × Sp(1))/Z

2

).

Proof. (1) trivial.

(2) Let U (1) = {a ∈ C | aa = 1} and S(U(1) × U(1) × U(1)) be the

diagonal subgroup of SU (3) and ψ : S(U (1) × U(1) × U(1)) → (G

2

)

D(r,s,t)

be the restriction map ψ of Proposition 2. Then, ψ is well-defined and

(5)

injective. We shall show that ψ is onto. For this purpose, we first show that for α ∈ (G

2

)

D(r,s,t)

, we have

αe

1

= ±e

1

.

Indeed, let αe

1

= a + m ∈ C ⊕ C

3

. From the condition αD(r, s, t) = D(r, s, t)α,

0 = α0 = αD(r, s, t)e

1

= D(r, s, t)αe

1

= D(r, s, t)(a + m) = D(r, s, t)m, we have m = 0. So αe

1

= a. Since |a| = |αe

1

| = |e

1

| = 1 and α1 = 1, we have αe

1

= ±e

1

. In the case of αe

1

= −e

1

, consider γ

c

∈ G

2

. Then αγ

c

e

1

= e

1

, so αγ

c

= ψ(A), A = (a

kl

) ∈ SU(3) (Proposition 2). Hence, α = ψ(A)γ

c

. Then

c

D(r, s, t)

 1 0 0

 = Aγ

c

re

1

0 0

 = A

−re

1

0 0

 =

−ra

11

e

1

−ra

21

e

1

−ra

31

e

1

 .

On the other hand, D(r, s, t)Aγ

c

 1 0 0

 = D(r, s, t)A

 1 0 0

 = D(r, s, t)

a

11

a

21

a

31

 =

re

1

a

11

se

1

a

21

te

1

a

31

 .

From the condition αD(r, s, t) = D(r, s, t)α, we have

t

( −ra

11

e

1

, −ra

21

e

1

, −ra

31

e

1

) =

t

(re

1

a

11

, se

1

a

21

, te

1

a

31

).

But, it is easy to see that this is false. Hence, we have αe

1

= e

1

, so α = ψ(A), A ∈ SU(3). From the condition αD(r, s, t) = D(r, s, t)α again, we have α = ψ(A), A ∈ S(U(1) × U(1) × U(1)), which shows that ψ is onto. Thus we have (G

2

)

D(r,s,t)

= S(U (1) × U(1) × U(1)) ∼ = U (1) × U(1).

(3) Since

exp(πD(2, −1, −1)) = exp(πψ

(diag(2e

1

, −e

1

, −e

1

)))

= exp(πϕ

(0, e

1

)) = γ,

if α ∈ G

2

commutes with D(2, −1, −1), then α also commutes with γ.

Hence, α ∈ (G

2

)

γ

= ϕ(Sp(1) × Sp(1)) (Proposition 1). So there ex- ist p, q ∈ Sp(1) such that α = ϕ(p, q). Again from the commutativity with exp

³ π

2 D(2, −1, −1) ´

= exp

³ π

2 ψ

(diag(2e

1

, −e

1

, −e

1

))

´

= ϕ(1, e

1

),

we have ϕ(p, q)ϕ(1, e

1

) = ϕ(1, e

1

)ϕ(p, q), hence, ϕ(p, qe

1

) = ϕ(p, e

1

q). So

qe

1

= e

1

q, therefore q ∈ C ∩ Sp(1) = U(1). Conversely, α = ϕ(p, q)

(p ∈ Sp(1), q ∈ U(1)) commutes with ϕ(1, e

te1

), t ∈ R, so α also com-

mutes with ϕ

(0, e

1

) = D(2, −1, −1). Thus, we have (G

2

)

D(2,−1,−1)

=

ϕ(Sp(1) × U(1)) = (Sp(1) × U(1))/Z

2

.

(6)

(4)

exp(πD(0, 1, −1)) = exp(πψ

(diag(0, e

1

, −e

1

)))

= exp(π(ϕ

(e

1

, 0)) = γ.

Hence, (G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

= (U (1) × Sp(1))/Z

2

is proved in a similar way to (3)

above. ¤

Proposition 4. If r and s are non-zero, then the groups (G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

= (U (1) × Sp(1))/Z

2

and (G

2

)

D(2s,−s,−s)

= (Sp(1) × U(1))/Z

2

are not conju- gate in the group G

2

.

Proof. We shall prove that D(0, r, −r) and D(2s, −s, −s) are not conjugate under the action of the group G

2

. Suppose that there exists α ∈ G

2

such that

α(D(0, r, −r)) = (D(2s, −s, −s))α.

Let αe

2

= a

0

+ m ∈ C ⊕ C

3

, m =

t

(m

1

, m

2

, m

3

). Then, from α

 0 0 0

0 re

1

0 0 0 −re

1

 1 0 0

 =

2se

1

0 0

0 −se

1

0

0 0 −se

1

a

0

+

m

1

m

2

m

3

 ,

we have

 0 0 0

 =

2sm

1

e

1

−sm

2

e

1

−sm

3

e

1

, hence, m

1

= m

2

= m

3

= 0, so

αe

2

= a

0

∈ C.

From (αe

2

)(αe

2

) = α(e

2

e

2

) = α( −1) = −1, we have a

0

a

0

= −1, hence, αe

2

= a

0

= ±e

1

. Similarly, we have αe

3

= ±e

1

. Then αe

1

= (αe

2

)(αe

3

) = ( ±e

1

)( ±e

1

) = ±1, which is a contradiction. ¤ Theorem 5. If r and s are non-zero, then the orbit spaces

X = {α(D(0, r, −r))α

−1

| α ∈ G

2

} and Y ={α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

| α ∈ G

2

} are not equivalent.

Proof. Suppose that there exists a G

2

-equivariant homeomorphism h : X Y . Then, there exists α ∈ G

2

such that

(1) h(D(0, r, −r)) = α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

. For any δ ∈ (G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

, we have

δ(h(D(0, r, −r)))δ

−1

= δ(α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

−1

.

Since h is a G

2

-equivariant homeomorphism, we have e δh = he δ. Hence, we see

(2) h(D(0, r, −r)) = δ(α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

−1

.

(7)

From (1) and (2), we have

δ(α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

−1

= α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

,

that is, α

−1

(δ(α(D(2s, −s, −s))α

−1

−1

)α = D(2s, −s, −s). This implies α

−1

δα ∈ (G

2

)

D(2s,−s,−s)

. Thus, we have

α

−1

((G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

⊂ (G

2

)

D(2s,−s,−s)

.

Since dim((G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

) = dim((G

2

)

D(2s,−s,−s)

) (Theorem 3 (3) and (4)), the inclusion above must be equal, that is,

α

−1

((G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

)α = (G

2

)

D(2s,−s,−s)

.

This means that the groups (G

2

)

D(0,r,−r)

and (G

2

)

D(2s,−s,−s)

are conjugate

in G

2

, which contradicts Proposition 4. ¤

References

[1] I. Yokota, Realizations of involutive automorphisms σ and Gσ of exceptional linear Lie groups, Part I, G = G2, F4 and E6, Tsukuba J. Math. 14(1990), 185–223.

[2] I. Yokota, Simple Lie groups of classical type (in Japanese), Gendai-Sugakusya, 1990.

[3] I. Yokota, Simple Lie groups of exceptional type (in Japanese), Gendai-Sugakusya, 1992.

Takashi Miyasaka Takatoh High School Obara, Takatoh 396-0293, Japan

e-mail address: [email protected] (Received July 13, 2001 )

References

Related documents

The superior lingular segmental artery, together with the inferior branch of the posterior segmental artery, was transected with a white reload ( Figures 23,24 ), and the

Style 744 FireLock flange adapters provide rigid joints when used on pipe with standard cut or roll groove dimensions and consequently allow no linear or angular movement at the

In a more recent study Pickhardt et al (2005) compared the accuracy of linear polyp measurement using 2-D m ultiplanar reform atted (MPR) and 3-D endolummal views

According to the current study results, intermittent phototherapy was as effective as continuous phototherapy to decrease the total serum bilirubin level among icteric term

All of the digital images were coded, stored and sub- mitted at random to two oncologists at BCH. These two experts were blinded to the MPU physician ’ s diagnosis and

Furthermore, we have documented that diagnostic ’ com- plexity ’ (indicated by further recording of other mental disorders in addition to the main psychiatric diagnosis,

at Viet Nam:AAP Sponsored on September 8, 2020 www.aappublications.org/news.

Given the lack of research concerning racial representation among main characters in Caldecott books, the purpose of this study is to examine how race is represented in