• No results found

COSO 2013 Internal Control Framework

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "COSO 2013 Internal Control Framework"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

COSO 2013 Internal Control

Framework

A Guide to Implementation Justin Adamson July 24, 2014

Agenda

COSO Background

Changes to the Framework

Roadmap to Implementation

(2)

3

Who/What is COSO?

 A private sector initiative, jointly sponsored and funded by:  American Accounting Association (AAA)

 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)

 Financial Executives International (FEI)

 Institute of Management Accountants (IMA)

 The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA)

 Formed after the SEC and U.S. Congress enacted campaign finance law reforms and the 1977 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

 Primary responsibility is to develop frameworks and guidance on enterprise risk management, internal control and fraud deterrence

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations

of the Treadway Commission (COSO)

COSO 1992 – Initial Framework

Initial framework defined

control functions in terms of:

Entities (2)

Categories (3)

Components (5)

(3)

5

COSO 2013 – Revised Framework

Revised the framework elements:

Entities (4)

Categories (3)

Components (5)

Source: Chapter 2 of COSO Internal Control:

Integrated Framework (2013).

Supersedes previous framework on December 15, 2014

COSO 2013: Key Changes

Codification of fundamental concepts from original framework

as “Principles” and offers points of focus for each principle

Expands the financial reporting category of objectives to

include other forms of reporting (internal and non-financial)

Consideration for changes to business and operating

environments

Increased relevance and dependence on IT

Focus on fraud risk assessment

(4)

7

COSO Internal Control – Integrated

Framework

The 5 components and 17 principles of internal control are

intended to function in an integrated manner

Control Environment Risk Assessment Control Activities Information & Communication Monitoring Activities

1. Demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values 2. Exercises oversight responsibility

3. Establishes structure, authority and responsibility 4. Demonstrates commitment to competence 5. Enforces accountability

6. Specifies suitable objectives 7. Identifies and analyzes risk 8. Assesses fraud risk

9. Identifies and analyzes significant change

13. Uses relevant information 14. Communicates internally 15. Communicates externally

16. Conducts ongoing and/or separate evaluations 17. Evaluates and communicates deficiencies 10. Selects and develops control activities

11. Selects and develops general controls over technology 12. Deploys through policies and procedures

COSO Internal Control – Integrated

Framework

Points of focus describe important characteristics of each Principle

Source: coso.org

Control Environment 1. The organization demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values.

Points of Focus:

Sets the Tone at the Top

Establishes Standards of Conduct

Evaluates Adherence to Standards of Conduct

Addresses Deviations in a Timely Manner

Control Examples:

 BOD and established committees charged with oversight

 Code of Conduct defining integrity and ethical values expected by the company  Follow-up/Investigation process of reported ethics violations

(5)

9

COSO Internal Control – Integrated

Framework

Risk Assessment 7. Identifies and Analyzes Risk

Points of Focus:

Includes Entity, Subsidiary, Division, Operating Unit and Functional Levels

Analyzes Internal and External Factors

Involves Appropriate Levels of Management

Estimates Significance of Risks Identified

Determines How to Respond to Risks

Control Examples:

 Risk/Control Self Assessment process and adherence (Likelihood/Impact ranking)  Risk and/or Performance metric dashboard monitoring and documentation of

acceptance or avoidance

 Documented governance and oversight process to ensure risks are communicated to appropriate levels of mgmt. (escalation path)

COSO 2013: Why now?

Catching up with emerging trends

Globalization of economies

Complexity of business

operations

Growing reliance on

technology

Increased reliance on

third-party

Increased volume and maturity

of fraud schemes

Increased government oversight,

regulations, and legislation

Increased focus and scrutiny of

BoD and Senior Management

oversight

(6)

11

Implementation Roadmap

Evaluate & Plan Map to New Framework

Refine & Enhance Documentation

Communicate & Train

 Read and interpret new framework

 Attend consultant webinars, seminars, and training classes

 Develop transition strategy with key stakeholders

 Top-down, risk based review of controls and map to framework as appropriate

 Consult with key mgmt. personnel to ensure appropriate coverage

 Consult with external auditors on COSO 2013 compliance

 Identify and clarify COSO 2013 controls in your universe  Ensure appropriate testing is in place  Internal Audit Involvement

 Consult with External Auditors  Communicate control framework to key management, external auditors, and BOD

 Provide training and awareness of the new framework to stakeholders

Implementation Considerations

 All 5 components and all 17 principles must be present, functioning and operating together in an integrated manner

 Principles are present and functioning if any deficiencies are less than “major” (same as material weakness using traditional SOX control deficiency methods)

 If implementing the framework for SOX compliance only, consider building the foundation for applying it to other company objectives

 Take this opportunity to take a fresh look at all controls

 Consider controls for vendors, and external business partners

 Implementation Evidence:

 Mapping of 17 principles to key controls

 Memo documenting implementation approach and process (who was involved, timeline, etc.)

(7)

13

Lessons Learned From Early Adopters

 This is not a complete overhaul of your system of internal controls – no major projects, consultants, or mountains of documents

 Top down, risk-based approach is recommended – COSO did not intend this to be a checklist exercise.

 Utilize currently available COSO guidance, manuals and tools

 Engage external and internal auditors early and often

 Engage internal/external stakeholders from the beginning

 Approaches, complexity and level of effort vary by organization

 Controls and processes likely exist, but just aren’t documented

 If it’s not documented, it doesn’t count!

 Present and functioning (tested)

PCAOB report findings may cover COSO

COSO 2013 – Revised Framework

References

Related documents