• No results found

How To Compare It Costs And Volumes In Higher Education

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "How To Compare It Costs And Volumes In Higher Education"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

“Higher education IT benchmarking 2014”

Ilkka Siissalo, CIO

University of Helsinki

Teemu Seesto, IT-secretary, FUCIO

Network of Finnish Universities’ Chief IT Officers

Yvonne Kivi, project manager

University of Helsinki

It's not just about the amount,

but also about the style.

(2)

A EUNIS taskforce

Yearly survey

Free of charge

Tools: Excel, Eduuni

Aim is to compare IT costs and volumes in

higher education institutes

Started in its present form in 2010, on the

initiative of Finnish CIOs (FUCIO)

In the first year 33 Finnish HEIs participated in

the survey (of 14 universities + 24 universities of

applied science= 38)

2012 we invited a few European HEIs to

participate and try out the survey and give us

feedback

2013 all European HEIs were welcome to

participate

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

2

(3)

• In 2015 we had 49 participating

HEIS:

*

– From Finland: 32 HEIs ( 12/14 universities, 20/24

universities of applied science)

– Sweden: Linköping university, Luleå university of

Technology, Royal institute of Technology, Stockholm

university, University of Gothenburg, Uppsala university

– Norway: Norges teknisk-naturvetenskapliga universitet,

Universitetet i Oslo, Universitetet i Bergen, Universitetet i

Stavanger, Universitetet i Tromsø

– Denmark: Syddanske universitet

– Germany: Ernst-Abbe-Fachhochschule Jena, Westfälische

Wilhelms-Universität Münster

– Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

– Netherlands: Fontys Hogescholen

– Slovenia: Univerza v Ljubljani

BM2014 – Survey / The participants

(4)

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

4

BM2014 – Survey / The participants

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

Finnish UAS

Finnish UNI

Norwegian UNI

Swedish UNI

Other

Average size

of org. in M€

Personnel FTE

Student FTE

0

5

10

15

20

25

Finland UAS

Finland UNI

Norway

Sweden

Germany

Denmark

Greece

Netherlands

Slovenia

Participants 2014

(5)

A joint effort

Project group

-

Teemu Seesto, University of Turku

-

Kari Kataja, HAMK University of Applied

Sciences

-

Esko Ala-Peijari, AAPA-network of

Universities of Applied Sciences

-

Ritva Suojärvi-Mäkinen, Metropolia

University of Applied Sciences

-

Markku Närhi, University of Jyväskylä

-

Yvonne Kivi, University of Helsinki

BM2014 – Survey / Working with Bencheit

• Steering group

- Ilkka Siissalo, University of Helsinki, Chairman

- Kimmo Pettinen, Laurea University of Applied Science,

Vice chairman

- Yvonne Kivi, University of Helsinki, Secretary

- Esko Ala-Peijari, AAPA network

- Kari Kataja, HAMK University of Applied Science

- Pekka Kähkipuro, Aalto University

- Kurt Gammelgaard Nielsen, University of Southern

Denmark

- Anders Nordin, Luleå University of Technology

- Jussi-Pekka Pispa, Tampere University of Technology

- Jaakko Riihimaa, Seinäjoki University of Applied

Sciences

- Tuomo Rintamäki, Helsinki Metropolia University of

Applied Sciences

- Ole Langfeldt, Norwegian University of Science and

Technology

- Teemu Seesto, Network of Finnish Universities’ Chief

IT Officers

(6)

– The survey is an Excel workbook,

distributed via

Eduuni

– Analysis also in Excel, choose which

HEIs you want to compare yourself

with

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

6

(7)

• Voluntary participation

• Emphasis on costs and

volumes of technology

• Cash flow based

 fluctuation between years

especially for one organisation.

• Participants see each others

complete data.

• Data and analysis is for participants only.

BM2014 – Survey / Principles

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

IT costs

in million €

Number of

participants

(8)

BM2014 – Survey / Dimensions

8

O

th

er

or

u

n

spe

cif

ied

O

u

tso

u

rc

ing

Fac

ilities

St

af

f

So

ftw

ar

e

Har

d

w

ar

e

Background info

Account groups

Infrastructure

- Operative

- HPC

Workstations

- Workstations

- Printing

IT Service Desk

Data networks: LAN & WAN

Voice services

- Telephony

- Phone calls

Business applications

- Finance

- Human resources

- Facilities

- Communications

- Student administration systems

- Research administration

- Library

- Teaching

- Other

- Unspecified

IT management

- Management

- Information security

Audio visual services

Other or unspecified

Ser

vic

es

/ Su

b

Ser

vic

es

V

ol

ume

s

CostAndFTE

(9)

Learning curve 1:

Gathering

information within

organisation

(and with peers)

Learning curve2:

Peer review

Behind differences of

numbers

BM-project group

revision and check +

Analysis

Preparation for next

round

+

Historic comparison

(10)

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

10

BM2014 – Survey / Allocation of the IT-costs*

50%

65%

52%

49%

41%

64%

20%

6%

22%

19%

26%

12%

28%

15%

24%

31%

34%

24%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All

Finland

UAS

Finland

UNI

Norway Sweden

Other

Unspecified

IT costs in academic

units

IT costs in other

central units

Centralized IT-costs

*costs = no facilities costs included

Other:

1 Denmark

2 Germany

1 Greece

1 Netherland

1 Slovenia

(11)

BM2014 – Survey / Allocation of the IT-work

65%

89%

69%

58%

56%

64%

14%

4%

13%

15%

18%

17%

21%

7%

18%

28%

26%

20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All

Finland

Finland

Norway Sweden

Other

Distributed

Other centralized

IT-centre

Other:

1 Denmark

2 Germany

1 Greece

1 Netherland

(12)

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

12

BM2014 – Survey / IT-costs* by services

23%

28%

25%

24%

21%

18%

25%

24%

24%

23%

29%

22%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All

Finland

UAS

Finland

UNI

Norway

UNI

Sweden

UNI

Other

Unspecified

Audiovisual services

IT management

Business applications

Voice services

Data networks: LAN

& WAN

IT Service Desk

Workstations (incl.

printers)

Infrastructure

*costs = no facilities costs included

Other:

1 Denmark

2 Germany

1 Greece

1 Netherland

1 Slovenia

(13)

BM2014 – Survey / IT-costs* by business applications

12%

13%

14%

22%

6%

8%

10%

6%

18%

10%

7%

9%

12%

11%

9%

17%

14%

3%

17%

20%

19%

11%

19%

14%

14%

30%

6%

13%

16%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All

Finland

Finland

Norway Sweden

Other

Unspecified

Other

Teaching

Library

Research admin.

Student admin.

Communications

Facilities

HR

Finance

*costs = no facilities costs included

Other:

1 Denmark

2 Germany

1 Greece

1 Netherland

(14)

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

14

BM2014 –

Survey / Workstations by type

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All

Finland

UAS

Finland

UNI

Norway

UNI

Sweden

UNI

Other

Other/Unspceified

Tablets

Laptops

Desktops

(15)

BM2011 - 2014 / Workstations by type*

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Tablets

Laptops

Desktops

* different participants on different years

(16)

BM2010 - 2014 / The development of the costs* in Finland

16

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

0 €

200 €

400 €

600 €

800 €

1,000 €

1,200 €

1,400 €

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

IT costs per student FTE

UAS

UNI

(17)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

All

Finland

Finland

Norway Sweden Other

Students /

IT personnel

(FTE)

Staff /

IT personnel

(FTE)

(18)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Run

Grow

Transform

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

18

BM2014 – Survey / Run – Grow – Transform –framework*

* Answers from 33 participants

(19)

Benchmark survey  Know your numbers!

Thank you!

(20)

• Aalto University (FI) • Abo Akademi University (FI)

• Arcada University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR) • Diaconia University of Applied Sciences (FI)

• Ernst-Abbe-Fachhochschule Jena - University of Applied Sciences (DE)

• Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL) • HAAGA-HELIA University of Applied Science (FI) • HAMK University of Applied Sciences (FI)

• Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Jyväskylä University of Applied Sciences (FI)

• Kajaani University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Karelia University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Lahti University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Lapland University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Lappeenranta University of Technology (FI) • Laurea University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Linköping University (SE)

• Luleå University of Technology (SE)

• Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO) • Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI)

• Royal Institute of Technology (SE) • Saimaa University of Applied Science (FI) • Satakunta University of Applied Sciencies (FI)

• Savonia University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (FI)

• South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences Ltd (FI) • Stockholm University (SE)

• Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI) • Tampere University of Technology (FI) • Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI) • University of Bergen (NO)

• University of Eastern Finland (FI) • University of Fine Arts Helsinki (FI) • University of Gothenburg (SE) • University of Helsinki (FI) • University of Jyväskylä (FI) • University of Lapland (FI) • University of Ljubljana (SI) • University of Münster (DE) • University of Oslo (NO)

• University of Southern Denmark (DK) • University of Stavanger (NO) • University of Tampere (FI)

• University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway (NO) • University of Turku (FI)

• University of Vaasa (FI) • Uppsala University (SE)

• Vaasan Ammattikorkeakoulu, University of Applied Sciences (FI)

EUNIS 2015 / 10th June 2015 / Kivi & Seesto & Siissalo

20

References

Related documents

22 The functional and ritualistic use of space in the Entrance Hall, State Bedchamber, Etruscan Dressing Room and Library at Osterley House and the Turret Rooms and Long

While all groups may post information on this board, everything posted must be approved and stamped by the Office of Student Life and Special Events, Suite 341. Any flier

Note on Phase II of the SharePoint form: This portion of the form serves as the working record on the review on eligibility to receive services through waiver service

He has considerable experience (over 18 years) with respect to all aspects of GIS including project management, strategic planning, business analysis, user needs

In relation to resources the Government programmes claims: “Chances to study must be related to aptitudes, abilities, hard work and not to wealth.” “By restructuring the tuition

In the results shown in Table 3 below it can be seen that all of the respondents in the survey maintain product data and that the majority keep customer and sales data..

As was discussed previously, high school teachers reported a lower level of overall familiarity with SEL than elementary school teachers, meaning they may be less aware of the

Payment for "Fire Hydrant with 150 millimeters Valve and Box", "Fire Hydrant with Tapping Sleeve, 150 millimeters Valve and Box" and "Relocate Fire