• No results found

North America LNG Import Terminals Status: Existing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "North America LNG Import Terminals Status: Existing"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

North America LNG Import Terminals

Status: Existing

Source: Various Public Sources

Everett

Cove Point

Lake Charles Elba Island

Gulf Gateway (*Decommissioning)

Altamira Existing Terminals – U.S.

Existing Terminals – non U.S.

Northeast Gateway

Freeport LNG Sabine Pass

Energia Costa Azul

Cameron Canaport Neptune LNG Golden Pass Gulf LNG Energy Manzanillo

(2)

North America LNG Import Terminals

Status: Approved, Under Construction*

Source: Various Public Sources

Approved Terminals, Under Construction – non U.S. Approved Terminals, Under Construction – U.S.

*FE-30 defines “under construction” as having undergone continuous construction activities beyond initial site preparation

(3)

North America LNG Import Terminals

Status: Approved, Not Under Construction

Source: Various Public Sources

Approved Terminals, Not Under Construction – non U.S.

Approved Terminals, Not Under Construction – U.S.

Sparrows Point

(4)

North America LNG Import Terminals

Status: Proposed (Under Regulatory Review*)

Source: Various Public Sources

Proposed Terminals – U.S. (FERC) Proposed Terminals – U.S. (Coast Guard)

Down East LNG

Proposed Terminals – non U.S.

*FERC has regulatory authority over proposed onshore and nearshore (State waters only) terminals.

MARAD and Coast Guard have regulatory authority over proposed offshore terminals

Oregon LNG

(5)

North America LNG Import Terminals

Status: Approved, Expansion

Source: Various Public Sources

Cameron

Freeport LNG Energia Costa Azul

Approved Expansions – non U.S.

Approved Expansions – U.S.

(6)

North America LNG Import Terminals

Status: Withdrawn/Suspended/Disapproved*

Source: Various Public Sources

Bear Head

Mar Adentro LNG

Withdrawn/Suspended/Disapproved Terminals – non U.S.

Withdrawn/Suspended/Disapproved Terminals - U.S. Compass Port Beacon Port Cabrillo Port Sound Energy Solutions Gulf Landing Vista del Sol

Weaver’s Cove

Port Pelican

•Withdrawn by sponsors before approval

•Suspended by sponsors after regulatory decision has been made

•Disapproved by a regulatory agency

Cacouna Energy Project

Calypso LNG OceanWay

Casotte Landing

Safe Harbor Energy Bradwood Landing LNG Clearwater Port Pearl Crossing Maple LNG Quoddy LNG Calais LNG Keyspan Creole Trail Port Arthur Ingleside Energy Center Crown Landing Broadwater Main Pass

Bienville Offshore Energy Terminal Liberty Natural Gas Project Rabaska LNG Jordan Cove Kitimat Terminal GNL de Sonora Calhoun LNG

(7)

U.S. LNG Export and Re-Export Terminals*

Source: Various Public Sources

Kenai, Alaska Lake Charles Freeport Sabine Pass Cameron Jordan Cove Cove Point Corpus Christi

*Existing, Approved or Proposed

[FERC has regulatory authority over proposed onshore and nearshore (State waters only) terminals. MARAD and Coast Guard have regulatory authority over proposed offshore terminals.]

Oregon LNG

Excelerate

Gulf LNG

(8)

Existing LNG Export Terminal – Kenai, Alaska

Proposed Export Terminal – Freeport LNG

 Existing facility for Imports of LNG/Exports of Previously Imported LNG  Received DOE approval for exports of:

Previously Imported LNG Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations Formal Application filed with FERC on August 31, 2012

Approved Export Terminal – Sabine Pass LNG

 Existing facility for Imports of LNG/Exports of Previously Imported LNG  Under Construction for Exports of Domestic LNG

(Facility received FERC approval on April 16, 2012)  DOE approval for exports of:

Previously Imported LNG Domestic LNG to FTA nations Domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Proposed Export Terminal – Cameron LNG

 Existing for Imports of LNG/Exports of Previously Imported LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Previously Imported LNG Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Formal Application filed with FERC on December 7, 2012

Proposed Export Terminal – Lake Charles LNG  Existing facility for Imports of LNG

 DOE approval for exports of: • Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Proposed Export Terminal – Dominion Cove Point LNG  Existing facility for Imports of LNG

 Received DOE approval for exports of: • Previously Imported LNG

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Proposed Export Terminal – Jordan Cove LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Previously approved by FERC as LNG import terminal; vacated by FERC on April 16, 2012

Proposed Export Terminal – Corpus Christi LNG  Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to FTA and Non-FTA nations

 Application filed with FERC on August 31, 2012, for construction of LNG import/export terminal

Proposed Export Terminal – Oregon LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

 Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review for proposed bi-directional import/export terminal

Proposed Export Terminal – Excelerate  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

(9)

Proposed Export Terminal – Gulf LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

 Has requested initiation of FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Proposed Export Terminal – Southern LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

(10)

U.S. LNG Export and Re-Export Terminals*

Source: Various Public Sources

Kenai, Alaska Lake Charles Freeport Sabine Pass Cameron Jordan Cove Cove Point Corpus Christi

*Existing, Approved or Proposed

[FERC has regulatory authority over proposed onshore and nearshore (State waters only) terminals. MARAD and Coast Guard have regulatory authority over proposed offshore terminals.]

Oregon LNG

Excelerate

Gulf LNG

(11)

Existing LNG Export Terminal – Kenai, Alaska

Proposed Export Terminal – Freeport LNG

 Existing facility for Imports of LNG/Exports of Previously Imported LNG  Received DOE approval for exports of:

Previously Imported LNG Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations Formal Application filed with FERC on August 31, 2012

Approved Export Terminal – Sabine Pass LNG

 Existing facility for Imports of LNG/Exports of Previously Imported LNG  Under Construction for Exports of Domestic LNG

(Facility received FERC approval on April 16, 2012)  DOE approval for exports of:

Previously Imported LNG Domestic LNG to FTA nations Domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Proposed Export Terminal – Cameron LNG

 Existing for Imports of LNG/Exports of Previously Imported LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Previously Imported LNG Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Formal Application filed with FERC on December 7, 2012

Proposed Export Terminal – Lake Charles LNG  Existing facility for Imports of LNG

 DOE approval for exports of: • Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Proposed Export Terminal – Dominion Cove Point LNG  Existing facility for Imports of LNG

 Received DOE approval for exports of: • Previously Imported LNG

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Proposed Export Terminal – Jordan Cove LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Previously approved by FERC as LNG import terminal; vacated by FERC on April 16, 2012

Proposed Export Terminal – Corpus Christi LNG  Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to FTA and Non-FTA nations

 Application filed with FERC on August 31, 2012, for construction of LNG import/export terminal

Proposed Export Terminal – Oregon LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

 Under FERC Pre-filing NEPA review for proposed bi-directional import/export terminal

Proposed Export Terminal – Excelerate  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

(12)

Proposed Export Terminal – Gulf LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

 Has requested initiation of FERC Pre-filing NEPA review

Proposed Export Terminal – Southern LNG  DOE approval for exports of:

Domestic LNG to FTA nations

 Under DOE review for exports of domestic LNG to Non-FTA nations

References

Related documents

A single (mono) subwoofer must be set as LFE subwoofer – no matter where you position it in the room Sub Right and Sub Left is used in combination only, as it is used for a

instalment payment amounts and frequency Fee protection scheme insurance student support services available admissions requirements and application procedures (including

To this end, WindEurope (representing the wind energy industry), Cefic (representing the European Chemical Industry) and EuCIA (representing the European Composites

In a nonmarket economy, production targets, prices, costs, investment allocations, raw materials, labor, international trade and most other economic aggregates are manipulated within

[r]

scientific names, while the remaining frames are plant photographs without any identifying names or numbers. Includes a study guide listing major. identification features. See page

A lot of OO CASE tools don’t have any good support for modeling instance diagrams (a.k.a. object diagrams, as opposed to class diagrams).. An instance diagram shows “live” objects, a

• Quick look in 2016 at 2018 launch trajectories showed lower peak heat fluxes and comparable heat loads for all components, so no worries (we thought). • Analysis resumed in