• No results found

Building a Network Performance Data Collection Framework with NDT and GIS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Building a Network Performance Data Collection Framework with NDT and GIS"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Building a Network Performance Data

Building a Network Performance Data

Building a Network Performance Data

Collection Framework with NDT and GIS

Building a Network Performance Data

Collection Framework with NDT and GIS

Seth Peery, Sr. GIS Architect

Virginia Tech Geospatial Information Sciences

April 18, 2011

Virginia Tech Geospatial Information Sciences

(2)

Relevance of Performance

Relevance of Performance

Measurement

Measurement

Internet benefits (economic development, health,

(

p

,

,

education, etc.) are derived from

effective use of

productive applications

[1], not mere

presence

of

infrastructure

infrastructure.

Performance measurement allows us to approximate

the user’s experience with the network and identify

y

what applications are feasible

[1] Gurstein, M. (2003). "Effective use: a community informatics strategy beyond the digital

[ ] , ( ) y gy y g

divide." First Monday 8(12).

(3)

Performance Measurement Use Cases

Performance Measurement Use Cases

Target Group Outcomes/Rationale

The publicp • Compare measured to advertised performancep p

• Model and estimate commodity network performance

CAIs • Identify underserved institutions

• Benchmarking and impact assessment for projects like US-UCAN

R&E connectors • Monitor R&E network health

Pl f t i i i

• Plan future provisioning

(4)

Supply-side vs. Demand-side

R

t ti

f C

ti it

Supply-side vs. Demand-side

R

t ti

f C

ti it

Representations of Connectivity

Representations of Connectivity

Supply Side

pp y

Demand Side

• Map the core and infer the edges

• Locations of infrastructure

• Map the edges and infer the core

• Spatial distribution of users

• Locations of infrastructure

• Service footprints

• Advertised speeds

• Spatial distribution of users

• Adoption and Digital Divide

• User-initiated performance t t

• Typical speeds

• Focus of SBDD data collection

• Passive/automated testing

tests

• Before SBDD, this was all we had

g

4

(5)

Advertised vs. Measured Performance

Advertised vs. Measured Performance

SBDD Max Advertised Download Speed < 200 mbps 200kbps - 768 kbps 768 kbps - 1.5 mbps 1 5 mbps 3 mbps 1.5 mbps - 3 mbps 3 mbps - 6 mbps 6 mbps - 10 mbps 10 mbps - 25 mbps 25 mbps - 50 mbps 50 mbps - 100 mbps 100 mbps - 1 Gbps > 1 Gbps > 1 Gbps

Virginia Tech NDT Test Data Points under 200 kbps 200kbps - 768 kbps 768kbps - 1.5 mbps 1.5mbps - 3 mbps 3mbps - 6 mbps 6mbps - 10 mbps 6mbps - 10 mbps 10mbps - 25 mbps 25mbps - 100 mbps over 100 mbps 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles

(6)

Sources of User-Initiated Network Performance Data

Sources of User-Initiated Network Performance Data

(7)

Virginia Tech eCorridors Broadband Map

Virginia Tech eCorridors Broadband Map

• Started in 2006 • Combines NDT with a Google Maps front-end • Nearly 5000 data points to date, and growing http://www.ecorridors.vt.edu/maps/broadbandmap

(8)

Network Performance Data in GIS

Network Performance Data in GIS

Virginia Data Points under 200 kbps 200kbps - 768 kbps 768kbps - 1.5 mbps 1.5mbps - 3 mbps5 bps 3 bps 3mbps - 6 mbps 6mbps - 10 mbps 10mbps - 25 mbps 25mbps - 100 mbps over 100 mbps 8

(9)

Spatial Analysis of Georeferenced

Spatial Analysis of Georeferenced

NDT results

NDT results

P i t b th

l

d

’t t ll

h

Points by themselves don’t tell us much

Spatial joins to bounded areas can yield

generalized summary information

generalized summary information

Getting a sufficiently large sample size is

critical

critical

Interpolation holds potential, once certain

constraints are properly modeled

(10)

Effect of AccelerateVirginia Campaigns

Effect of AccelerateVirginia Campaigns

Sample Size 0 1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 25 26 - 100 101 - 644 10

(11)

Generalization by Areal Unit

Generalization by Areal Unit

Vi i i D t P i t

Counties Blocks

Virginia Data Points under 200 kbps 200kbps - 768 kbps 768kbps - 1.5 mbps 1.5mbps - 3 mbps 3mbps - 6 mbps 6mbps - 10 mbps 10mbps 25 mbps 10mbps - 25 mbps 25mbps - 100 mbps over 100 mbps Average Download Avg_downlo no data under 200 kbps 200 kbps - 768 kbps 200 kbps - 768 kbps 768kbps - 1.5 mbps 1.5 mbps - 3 mbps 3 mbps - 6 mbps 6 mbps - 10 mbps 10 mbps - 25 mbps 25 mbps - 100 mbps over 100 mbps over 100 mbps

(12)

Areal Averages used in Analysis

Areal Averages used in Analysis

g

g

y

y

County-level aggregated map data

County business patterns

12

(13)

Interpolation

Interpolation

Kriging Predicted Values 0.002038659 0.002038659 - 0.2 0.2 - 0.768 0.768 - 1.5 1.500000001 - 3 3.000000001 - 6 6.000000001 - 10 10.00000001 - 20 20.00000001 - 92.98016357 92.98016358 - 100

(14)

Testing Anchor Institutions: v1

Testing Anchor Institutions: v1

Testing Anchor Institutions: v1

Testing Anchor Institutions: v1

(15)

Anchor

Institutions v2 :

Anchor

Institutions v2 :

Institutions v2 :

Internet2 K20

CAIDATA

Institutions v2 :

Internet2 K20

CAIDATA

Project

Project

(16)

Research Directions

Research Directions

Research Directions

Research Directions

• Network performance measurements can be aggregated to any desired spatial unit of analysis: county, ZIP code, Census block

• Data can be analyzed over large regions or at the local level

• Objective, user-contributed network performance measurements can be used as inputs to models that quantify many other

can be used as inputs to models that quantify many other outcomes of network connectivity

• Economic Impact

• Education

• Health Care

• Government Performance

• Safety and SecuritySafety and Security

(17)

Combining Performance Measurement

Combining Performance Measurement

with Specialized Research Studies

with Specialized Research Studies

eCommerce Survey Respondents

Speed_Download_Mbps 0.000000 - 0.200000 0.200001 - 0.768000 0.768001 - 1.500000 1.500001 - 3.000000 3.000001 - 6.000000 6.000001 - 10.000000 10.000001 - 25.000000 25.000001 - 100.000000 100.000001 - 319.062000 Health IT Adoption 0 12.5 25 50 75 100 Miles E-Commerce usage by Businesses

(18)

Seth’s Research Design for Economic Impact

Seth’s Research Design for Economic Impact

g

g

p

p

(19)

Challenges of Using Measured

Challenges of Using Measured

Performance Data in Research

Performance Data in Research

Removing the measurement infrastructure as

Removing the measurement infrastructure as

a source of error

Controlling for temporal and spatial variability

Controlling for temporal and spatial variability

in individual speed tests

Understanding the limits to the

g

generalizability of individual tests

(20)

Platform Considerations

Platform Considerations

Platform Considerations

Platform Considerations

• Attend Performance WG on

Wednesday at 0730 to learn more

• I2 is a leader in the measurement space due to NDT

• Is “mass market” network performanceIs mass market network performance measurement a fundamentally

different use case?

• The e de facto de acto standard should be opensta da d s ou d be ope

• More fundamentally…

• User-initiated vs. passive / automated testing?

• Moving the test platform closer to the user … regardless of platform

(21)

Contact Information

Contact Information

Contact Information

Contact Information

Seth Peery

Seth Peery

Senior GIS Architect, Enterprise GIS

Virginia Tech Geospatial Information Sciences

2060 Torgersen Hall (0197), Blacksburg, VA 24061

(540) 231-2178

sspeery@vt edu

[email protected]

http://gis.vt.edu

References

Related documents