• No results found

Energy-Related Litigation: Personal Injury

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Energy-Related Litigation: Personal Injury"

Copied!
46
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Energy-Related Litigation:

Personal Injury

ALSO FIND US ON http://www.linkedin.com/companies/216795 http://www.facebook.com/Steptoe.Johnson

© 2013 Steptoe & Johnson PLLC . All Rights Reserved.

FOLLOW STEPTOE & JOHNSON ON TWITTER:

(2)

Keynote Speakers

W. Randolph Fife

(3)

Energy-Related Litigation:

Personal Injury

(4)

Firm Study

The expansion of oil and gas work

AND

(5)

Personal Injury Litigation

• Typical scenario: drilling of well and

accident

– Explosion

– Slip and fall

– Injured worker – Damage to land

• Litigation no longer just between Plaintiffs

(6)

Elements of Negligence Action

• To establish liability in a negligence action,

Plaintiff must prove: (a) Duty

(b) Breach

(c) Proximate Cause (d) Damages

(7)

Negligence Per Se is

Double (Edged Sword)

Involves a violation of a statute or regulation

• Plaintiffs may argue that regulatory

violations constitute negligence per se or

are otherwise evidence of negligence

• Defendants argue that compliance with

these requirements establish that no negligence occurred

(8)

Gross Negligence

• Reckless and Wanton conduct

(9)

Contractor Liability

• Allegations for failing to: – make a safe workplace – to act reasonably

– stop unsafe activities – properly supervise – train

– implement or enforce proper policies, rules

(10)

Liability of Those On The Job Site

Property Owners or Occupier of Land:

Duty based on:

(1) Relationship (2) Knowledge Or

(11)

Different Status of Claimant

• 3 general roles: – Trespasser

– Licensee – Invitee

(12)

OH/PA/WV - Trespasser

• No authority to enter or remain on land! • Duty not to willfully or purposefully injure!

(13)

Ohio Exception Trespasser Rule

Children, if they know:

– Likely trespass

– Condition could cause serious injury or death – No discovery

And

– The balance of need < danger

And

(14)

West Virginia Distinction

• Only trespasser and licensee/invitee

• Duty: Reasonable Care Under The Circumstances • Look at:

– Foreseeability – Severity

– Time, Manner and Circumstances – Normal Use of Premises

(15)

Licensee

• Consent Obtained • General liability if:

‒ Knows or has reason to know of the condition ‒ Failure to exercise reasonable care

‒ Claimant not know of condition

• OH: Same as duty owed to trespasser • PA: Same as general

(16)

Ohio and Pennsylvania Invitee

• Express or Implied Invitation as – Member of the public, or

– Mutually beneficial business • Liability:

(a) Know of or not to discover unreasonably dangerous condition

(b) Expect not to discover it

(c) Failure to exercise reasonable care to protect against the danger

(17)

Ohio

• A construction site is inherently dangerous • Primary responsibility on:

Subcontractor NOT

(18)

Independent Contractors

• Employee or independent contractor? – Depends on Amount of Control!

(19)

Comparative/Contributory Negligence

OH/PA:

– No recovery if negligence is 51% or

greater

– If 50% or less, award is diminished by

percentage of negligence of Plaintiff

WV:

(20)

Ohio

Joint and Several Liability

If 2 or more persons are liable:

• if 50% on 1 defendant then liable for all

and other for % share

• if < 50% on 1 defendant where

(21)

Pennsylvania

Joint and Several Liability

If 2 or more persons are liable:

• if 60% or more at fault, can be liable for all • If action involves intentional

misrepresentation, intentional tort or

release/threatened release of hazardous substance, can be liable for all

(22)

West Virginia

Joint and Several Liability

For defendants who liability is 30% or less, only liable for % of damages.

(23)

Ohio Punitive Damages

• Purpose to punish and deter NOT compensate • Not recoverable unless both

– The actions or omissions demonstrate malice

And

– Proof of actual damages • Malice is the state of mind

(24)

Pennsylvania Punitive Damages

• Only awarded for outrageous conduct – Evil Motive or

– Reckless Indifference to the rights of others • Should consider:

– The character of the person's act,

– The nature and extent of the harm, and – The wealth of the wrongdoer

(25)

West Virginia Punitive Damages

Done maliciously, wantonly, or with criminal indifference. Objectives include:

1) Punishing the defendant 2) Deterring others

3) Providing additional compensation for egregious conduct

4) Encouraging a plaintiff to bring an action where he or she might be discouraged by the cost of the action 5) As a substitute for personal revenge by the injured

party

(26)

Ohio Statute of Limitations

Type of Claim Period Authority

Bodily injury 2 years R. C. § 2305.10

Injury to personal property 2 years R. C. § 2305.10

Wrongful death 2 years R. C. § 2125.02

Employer Intentional Tort 2 years R. C. § 2125.02

Contracts in writing 8 years R. C. § 2305.06

Contracts not in writing 6 years R. C. § 2305.07

Trespass or taking or

(27)

Pennsylvania Statute of Limitations

Type of Claim Period Authority

Bodily injury 2 years 13 Pa.C.S. 5525

Injury to personal property 2 years 13 Pa.C.S. 5525

Wrongful death or taking or

detaining of personal property 2 years 13 Pa.C.S. 5524

Trespass upon real property 4 years 13 Pa.C.S. 5525

Contracts in writing 4 years 13 Pa.C.S. 5525

(28)

West Virginia Statute of Limitations

Type of Claim Period

Bodily injury 2 years

Injury to personal property 2 years

Wrongful death 2 years

Employer Intentional Tort 2 years

Contracts in writing 10 years

(29)

Cross-Claims

• Express Indemnity: Based on written

agreement

• Implied: Arising out of relationship of

(30)

Anti-Indemnity Provisions

OH: Can’t make someone else assume your own negligence!

(R. C. § 2305.31)

See also Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4123.82(a)

PA: Voids indemnification for design professionals. 68 P.S. §491

WV: Allows a provision in the contract allowing indemnity for one’s solo negligence, so long as the provision is tied to a requirement to purchase insurance.

(31)

Nuisance Claims

Interferes with the use or enjoyment of land. 1) Private nuisance - unreasonable

interference

2) Public nuisance - broader harm to the public

(32)

Ohio Nuisance Claims

• Cease and desist

• Standard is Reasonableness • Factors include:

– Location and

(33)

Pennsylvania Nuisance Claims

• Unreasonable, Unwarrantable, or Unlawful

Use

• To the right of another, or the public

• Producing annoyance, inconvenience, or

discomfort

(34)

West Virginia Nuisance Claims

• Noxious odors • Poor air quality • Water pollution • Flash flooding • Noise

(35)

West Virginia Trespass Claims

• Conduct must result in an actual,

nonconsensual invasion of property that interferes with the possession and use of that property

• When the drilling bit or wellbore itself

physically intrudes into the earth beneath a surface estate, such action constitutes a

(36)

Damages for Trespass

Depends on whether:

• Physical subsurface trespass

‒ Temporary and

‒ Permanent damages

• Taking of minerals

‒ Good or ‒ Bad faith

(37)

Ohio Deliberate Intention

Intent presumed if:

A. Deliberately lied about whether a substance was toxic or hazardous and that substance injured the employee, or

B. If an employer deliberately removed an

“equipment safety guard” and that removal injured the employee.

R.C. 2745.01.

Note: 6th Dist. Court of Appeals - non-operators injured by removal of such a device could also obtain a presumption of intent.

(38)

West Virginia Deliberate Intention

• Requirement for workers’ compensation coverage • Immune from Liability

• Narrow Exception?

• Elements of statutory test:

– Unsafe working condition – Actual Knowledge.

– Violation of a written rule or standard – Intentional Exposure

(39)

Pennsylvania Immunity Exception

• Employer’s fraudulent representations that aggravated

work related injury

• Employer’s failure to maintain the mandatory Workers'

Compensation insurance

• Intentional acts, which are not related to work

• Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, Defamation or

Wrongful discharge cases

• Argument by employer that the accident did not occur in

course and scope of employment

• Conduct of third parties to injure

(40)

Ultra-Hazardous Activities

Strict liability for blasting, oil drilling and

(41)

Ultra-Hazardous Activities

• Based on abnormal danger of the activity

• General Factors:

1) Existence of a high degree of risk of harm to the person, land, or chattels of others

2) Likelihood that the harm that results from the activity will be great

3) Inability to eliminate the risk by the exercise of reasonable care

4) Extent to which the activity is not a matter of common usage 5) Inappropriateness of the activity to the place where it is

carried on

6) Extent to which its value to the community is outweighed by its dangerous attributes

(42)

Ultra-Hazardous Activities

• OH: Not determined • PA: Fact-Intensive

(43)

Points to Take Away

• Energy related personal injury litigation is

increasing in the Marcellus and Utica Shale areas

• Protect yourself by knowing the laws of the

jurisdictions in which you operate

• Carefully draft and/or update all

indemnification agreements to ensure that they comply with the laws of the

(44)

Points to Take Away

• Understand the relationship of all

individuals and companies to you on the jobsite

• Take reasonable measures to protect

everyone on the jobsite

• Review your insurance policies to make

(45)

Thank You!

Randy Fife

Charleston, WV

randy.fife@steptoe-johnson.com 304.353.8115

Phillip Glyptis

Wheeling, WV

phillip.glyptis@steptoe-johnson.com 304.230.2332

(46)

These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational purposes to contribute to the understanding of energy and oil and gas law. These materials reflect only the personal views of the authors and are not individualized legal advice. It is understood that each case is fact-specific, and that the appropriate solution in any case will vary. Therefore, these materials may or may not be relevant to any particular situation. Thus, the authors and Steptoe & Johnson PLLC cannot be bound either

philosophically or as representatives of their various present and future clients to the comments expressed in these materials. The presentation of these materials does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with the authors or Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. While every attempt was made to insure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be

contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.

References

Related documents

The two main contributions of this paper are: (i) We use the results of Click’n’Cut campaigns with different groups of users to examine and quantify the crowdsourc- ing loss

The joint effect of smoking and radiation on lung cancer in the LSS is dependent on smoking intensity and is best described by the generalized interaction model rather than a

7 shows the (a) average airtime allocated for the LTE-LAA network, (b) average airtime allocated for WLAN, (c) proportion of served total network traffic load, and (d) Jain’s

The following important factors, in addition to those discussed or referred to under the heading “Risk Factors,” and other unforeseen events or circumstances, could affect our

and Al-Oda, Al-Akrad, Al-Baradan and Al-Zu’bi rebel leaders. Rebel leaders demanded the withdrawal of the SAA from the localities seized after the launch of the June 2018

Apoteket has a sustainability programme with targets within high-priority areas such as health for customers and employees, responsible relations with co-suppliers, reduced

The effect of a large amount of kaolin (China clay) on the viscosity, cure, hardness, Young’s modulus, tensile strength, elongation at break, stored energy density at break,

Specifically, this study examined the effects of looping on reading and math achievement of elementary aged Exceptional Student Education (ESE) students identified with