• No results found

Language Meaning and Use

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Language Meaning and Use"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Language Meaning

Language Meaning

and Use

and Use

Website: www.uni-due.de/ELE

Raymond Hickey, English Linguistics

(2)

Types of meaning

Types of meaning

There are four recognisable types of meaning:

lexical

meaning, grammatical

meaning, sentence

meaning and utterance

meaning which refer to the

areas of derivational morphology, inflectional

morphology, syntax and pragmatics respectively.

External meaning relationships involve sense

(relationships between words) and denotation

(relationship of word to what it signifies).

(3)
(4)

Semantics and Pragmatics

Semantics and Pragmatics

Semantics is concerned with the study of meaning in language and is related to both philosophy and logic. Semiotics is the study of communication systems in general. Sign language is a common means of

communication among those who are deaf and can, if learned from childhood, approach natural language in terms of scope and flexibility.

Pragmatics is the study of language from the point of view of usage. It has various sub-forms depending on the emphasis given by linguists, for instance it can be investigated from a strictly linguistic stance or with regard to social factors.

(5)
(6)

Types of meaning

Types of meaning

There are four recognisable types of meaning:

lexical

meaning, grammatical

meaning, sentence

meaning and utterance

meaning which refer to the

areas of derivational morphology, inflectional

morphology, syntax and pragmatics respectively.

External meaning relationships involve sense

(relationships between words) and denotation

(relationship of word to what it signifies).

(7)

Types of meaning

Types of meaning

► 1) LEXICAL MEANING is that of individual words or of

compound words, for instance, What is the trachea? What is lexicology? What is a drumlin?

► 2) GRAMMATICAL MEANING is that of form words which

only obtain significance when used in connection with

lexical words. Such form words are the many prepositions, conjunctions or determiners in a language. Their meaning is only evident in a sentence or phrase containing lexical items. For instance, the word to has no independently specifiable meaning but in the sentence He gave a lovely present to his wife it has grammatical meaning as it

precedes the beneficiary of an action. These elements

typically have many functions, for example, to is commonly used as an infinitive marker as in They decided to come.

(8)

Types of meaning

Types of meaning

► 3) SENTENCE MEANING results from the combination of

words in a sentence. This can vary even with the same

words as with a sentence where the subject and the object are exchanged. Meaning can furthermore depend on the scope of an element, deriving from its position in a

sentence, compare that of all in the following sentences All the boys ate the food and The boys ate all the food which contain the same words but in a different order.

► 4) UTTERANCE MEANING is that of a sentence in a

particular spoken context which is not necessarily the same as its literal meaning, cf. Can you pass me the salt? which is not a question but a request. Utterance meaning is

closely linked to the area of linguistics called speech act theory which examines the use and classification of

(9)

Meaning relationships

Meaning relationships

There are various internal meaning relationships such

synonymy (sameness of meaning), antonymy (difference in meaning), hyponymy (hierarchical order of meaning).

Antonyms can be classified as graded and non-graded. Perfect synonymy does not exist as similar words usually differ in the stylistic contexts in which they are to be

found.

Deixis concerns the various types of pointing which is possible with language. This can be direct, with adverbs of direction, or indirect, for instance with different types of pronoun.

(10)

Word fields

Word fields

► A word field is a collection of words which share a basic

meaning. An example would be „furniture“ which would

include the members „chair, stool, sofa, couch, table, etc.“. It would seem to be that all the words of all languages

belong to some word field or other, i.e. there are no „free-floating“ independent words.

► When children acquire words they store them in word

fields which makes it much easier to retrieve them later. Word fields can be embedded in a hierarchical manner,

e.g. „living organisms“ > „animals“ > „human beings“ > (i) „males“ > „men, boys“, (ii) „females“ > „women, girls“

(11)

Models for analysing meaning

Models for analysing meaning

Different models for semantic analysis are available: prototype theory, where a central concept is taken as typical and less central ones are peripheral, and

componential analysis which seeks to break words down into their component semantic parts.

For instance, a sparrow might be regarded as a

prototypical bird (in Western countries) but a penguin or an ostrich would not (both are large flightless birds).

(12)

Presupposition and entailment

Presupposition and entailment

Presupposition

A statement presupposes that something else is also

true.

Did you enjoy your dinner?

Presupposition: You

had dinner.

Entailment

Refers to a sentence which, if true, mean a further,

more general sentence is also true.

(13)

Speech acts

Speech acts

► A speech act is a classifiable and structured utterance

spoken in an actual communication situation. There are preconditions for speech acts such as felicity conditions which must be met for a speech act to be successful.

► Speech acts are classified according to their effect.

Locutionary acts simple express sense or reference. Illocutionary acts express the intentions of the speaker whereas for perlocutionary acts the effect is of greatest importance. There are further subdivisions in type such as directives (commands for example) or commissives

(promises for instance). An indirect speech act is one where the intended meaning of a sentence is different from the literal one.

(14)

Discourse analysis

Discourse analysis

Discourse analysis is concerned with the analysis of spoken language in sections larger than the sentence. The two main features for successful discourse are coherence (based on semantic transparency) and cohesion (achieved through formal mechanisms such as sentence connectors and anaphoric elements).

In the analysis of conversation various implicatures – ‘rules’ if you like – are taken to apply. They refer to the quality, quantity, relevance and manner of conversation and are assumed to be almost universally valid.

(15)

Dictionaries and the mental lexicon

A dictionary is a book with definitions, normally in alphabetical order.

The mental lexicon is the set of word meanings which are stored in one‘s brain. These are not in alphabetical order and contain much additional information such as additional shades of meaning and the phonetic shape of words.

(16)

Dictionaries and the mental lexicon

You use a dictionary to look up word you do not know.

The mental lexicon is extremely fast, you cannot measure the time it takes to retrieve a word

(unless you have a temporary block, e.g. when you are nervous or tired.).

(17)

The acquisition of semantics and pragmatics

Children pass through clear stages of acquisition in the first five or six years of their lives. Within each of these stages there are recognisable characertistics. A prominent characteristic is overextension. Children always begin overextending, e.g. in the realm of semantics by using the word dog for all animals if the first animal they are confronted with is a dog. Or by calling all males papa or by using spoon for all items of cutlery.

Often children begin by using a proper name for things, e.g. calling all dogs “Grover“ (if the family dog has this name). Later children abandon this and use common names, i.e. “dog“ for all dogs. What this means is that children learn the cognitive distinction between a class of objects/beings and individual

members of a class (“Grover“ is a single member of the class of dogs). Furthermore, children learn to distinguish between a single, non-specific member “a dog“ and a specific reference “the dog we have at home“ and a generalised, non-specific reference “dogs are nice pets“.

(18)

The acquisition of semantics and pragmatics

The conclusion one can draw from this behaviour is that children move from the general to the particular. To begin with their language is undifferentiated on all linguistic levels. With time they introduce more and more distinctions as they are repeatedly confronted with these from their surroundings. Increasing distinctions in language may well be linked to increasing cognitive

development: the more discriminating the children’s perception and

(19)

The acquisition of semantics and pragmatics

Children acquire the meanings of use from their use in the language they hear around them. If words come to be used in slight different contexts, then their meaning changes and later generations will acquire these words with the

shifted meanings. For instance, the word „joy“ is now used in the sense of „success“, e.g. „He got no joy out of the insurance firm.“ So one can say that the meaning of „joy“ has expanded from „feeling of happiness, well-being“ to encompass the meaning of „success“ (because this triggers well-being in the person who experiences it).

(20)

Recommended literature

Recommended literature

Aitchison

Aitchison, Jean 1994. , Jean 1994. Words in the mind. An introduction to the mental Words in the mind. An introduction to the mental lexicon.

lexicon. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell. Cruse, Alan 2000.

Cruse, Alan 2000. Meaning in language. An introduction to semantics and Meaning in language. An introduction to semantics and pragmatics.

pragmatics. Oxford: University Press.Oxford: University Press. Gramley

Gramley, Stephan 2001. , Stephan 2001. The vocabulary of world EnglishThe vocabulary of world English. London:Arnold. London:Arnold.. Kearns, Katherine 2000.

Kearns, Katherine 2000. Semantics.Semantics. London: Macmillan.London: Macmillan. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983.

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmaticsPrinciples of pragmatics. London: Longman.. London: Longman. Levinson, Steven 1983.

Levinson, Steven 1983. PragmaticsPragmatics. Cambridge: University Press.. Cambridge: University Press. Saeed

Saeed, John I. 1996. , John I. 1996. Semantics.Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Oxford: Blackwell. Stubbs, Michael 2000.

Stubbs, Michael 2000. Word and phrases. CorpusWord and phrases. Corpus--studies of lexical studies of lexical semantics.

References

Related documents

Here, we address the latter, while considering the logical formalism using Answer Set Pro- gramming (ASP) and focusing on the Boolean case. Note that it is possible to represent

In the present study using primary cultures of mouse microglia, 10 ng/ml LPS decreased saquinavir accumulation significantly at 6 and 24 hours, presumably due to increased

Baby Suggs experienced slave life in Sweet Home long before Sethe and Paul D. In her

The yellow, orange and red pigments extracted by Monascus species showed great antioxidant and anti-cholesterol activity [28], due to this reason many fermented products of

I understand that a copy of Chapter 11, Business Licensing and Regulations, and Chapter 3, Alarm Systems of the Aztec City Code is available upon request or I can visit the City

The primate city is the most populous and always the national capital (or de facto capital) with a mean of 1.8 million in the sample; secondary cities are in the top

Byly vyčísleny celkové náklady na léčbu dekubitů pacientů v populaci za rok 2017, pro jednotlivé preventivní metody byly stanoveny mezní doby nákladové efektivity použití

The final state after the computation of the heat exchange between rock and groundwater is used as the final state of the temperature distribution at the end of