Copyright © 2012 Aragon Research Inc. and or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This publication may not be distributed in any form without Aragon Research’s prior written permission. The information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be
reliable. Nevertheless, Aragon Research provides this publication and the information contained in it "AS IS," without warranty of any kind. Authors: Mike Anderson, Jim Lundy
Q&A: Google Apps v. Microsoft Office 365
Summary: As people become more comfortable with
cloud-based office suites, Google and Microsoft are
competing
to
see who will own the “office in the cloud.” Here we answer
some questions from clients about these two technology
providers.
On the surface, Google Apps and Office 365 both feature a
core of email and calendar systems with office productivity
apps for creating and editing documents, spreadsheets and
presentations. Users can store files, share them with others,
and collaborate in real time on the phone or with chat, which
can include voice and video. Both
services are compatible
with Microsoft Office and
can share or interchange files with
the desktop versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint (file
fidelity differs, and only Microsoft integrates with OneNote).
Beneath
these similarities, however, there
are fundamental
differences that clearly define the battle being waged. Google
Apps and Office 365 are very different products with very
different objectives. Google’s aim is to supersede the desktop
suite and
make “office in the cloud” the dominant mass
-market
approach by providing “good enough” capabilities
across the most popular applications. Google’s starting point
is a set of services aimed initially at consumers, with
enhancements aimed at attracting enterprises.
Microsoft approaches the cloud as an extension of its
desktop Office
franchise,
with a
strong focus on enterprise
needs.
Office 365 is intended to protect that franchise and
extend it with cloud capabilities,
backed by
business-class
privacy, security and service continuity.
This
Research Note
an
swers some common questions about
these
rival cloud
suites.
For details about the two offerings,
see
RN 2012-15, “Google and Microsoft: The Battle For Office
In The Cloud.”
The battle will continue to evolve. As an
example, Microsoft, as of July 16
th, has
a new version of
Topics: Workplace; Content Management; Collaboration
Issues: What are the technologies and architectures that enterprises should leverage in the workplace?
How will content management technologies and architectures evolve?
Who are the collaboration providers, and how will they evolve?