• No results found

Supporting Information

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Supporting Information"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Supporting Information

Lee

et al.

10.1073/pnas.0812801106

Fig. S1. Inhibition of HIF-1 transcriptional activity by anthracyclines. (A) HIF-1-dependent luciferase (Luc) activity was determined in Hep3B-c1 cells treated with 0, 0.2, or 1␮M idarubicin (IDA) or epirubicin (EPI) under 20% (open bars) or 1% (filled bars) O2for 24 h. Cells were lysed and analyzed for the ratio of firefly to RenillaLuc activity. (B) HEK293 cells were exposed to 20% (open bars) or 1% (filled bars) O2for 24 h in the presence of 0, 0.2, or 1␮M IDA or EPI. Total RNA was

isolated for determination of VEGF (Left) and GLUT1 (Lower) mRNA levels by quantitative real-time reverse-transcription (qRT) PCR. The mRNA levels were normalized to the levels of 18S rRNA in each sample, and each value was expressed relative to the levels in vehicle-treated cells exposed to 20% O2. Mean⫾SEM

(2)

Fig. S2. Mechanism of action by which anthracyclines inhibit HIF-1 activity. (A) HIF-1␣protein levels were determined by immunoblot assays of lysates prepared from HEK293 cells that were cultured in the presence of 0, 1, 5, or 10␮M daunorubicin (DNR), doxorubicin (DXR), IDA, or EPI at 1% O2for 20 h. To verify equal

loading, the blot was stripped and reprobed with a␤-actin antibody. (B) HIF-1 transactivation domain function was analyzed by using GAL4/HIF-1␣fusion proteins. HEK293 cells were cotransfected with reporter plasmid pG5-E1b-Luc, which contains five tandem GAL4-binding sites upstream of a minimal E1b gene promoter and coding sequences for firefly Luc; pSV-Renilla, which contains coding sequences forRenillaLuc downstream of a basal SV40 promoter; and an expression vector encoding GAL-O [GAL4 DNA-binding domain (DBD) only], GAL-A (GAL4-DBD/HIF-1␣531– 826), GAL-C (GAL4-DBD/HIF-1␣653– 826), or GAL-H

(GAL4-DBD/HIF-1␣786 – 826). After 24 h, transfected cells were treated with 5␮M DNR, DXR, EPI, or IDA or vehicle (Con) and exposed to 1% (filled bars) or 20%

(open bars) O2for 24 h followed by cell lysis and determination of firefly andRenillaLuc activities. The mean⫾SEM ratio of firefly toRenillaLuc activity from

three independent transfections is shown (GAL act). (C) Dimerization of HIF-1␣and HIF-1␤was determined by using GST pulldown assay. Purified GST-HIF-1␤11–510

fusion protein was incubated with lysates from HEK293 cells transfected with vector encoding FLAG-HIF-1␣in the presence or absence of 5␮M DNR, DXR, EPI, or IDA. Proteins were then pulled down with glutathione–Sepharose 4B beads and subjected to immunoblot (IB) assays by using anti-FLAG and anti-GST antibodies.

(3)

HIF-2

HIF-2

IgG

IgG

Input

Input

IP

IP

VEGF

Promoter

PDK1

Promoter

M

Con DXR DNR Con DXR DNR

M

gDNA

20% O

2

1% O

2

Fig. S3. Effect of DXR and DNR on HIF-2␣DNA-binding activity. HEK293 cells were exposed to 1% or 20% O2in the presence of vehicle (Con) or 1 mM DXR

or DNR for 20 h. Input DNA was isolated from an aliquot of lysate before immunoprecipitation (IP), and lysates were then divided between anti-HIF-2␣and rabbit IgG for IP. PCR was performed by using the immunoprecipitates as template to amplifyVEGFandPDK1promoter sequences. PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. M, 200-bp size marker.

(4)

Fig. S4. Effect of DNR or DXR on HIF-1 activity in Hep3B-c1 cells. (A) HIF-1␣protein levels were determined by immunoblot assays of lysates prepared from Hep3B-c1 cells that were exposed to hypoxia (1% O2, 20 h) in the presence of vehicle control (Con) or 1, 5, or 10␮M DNR or DXR. (B) VEGF and GLUT1 mRNA

levels were determined by using qRT-PCR in Hep3B-c1 cells treated with vehicle (Con) or 0.2, 1, or 5␮M DNR or DXR under 1% (filled bars) or 20% (open bars) O2. Mean⫾SD (n⫽4) are shown.**,P⬍0.01 vs. control, Student’sttest.

(5)

Fig. S5. Effect of DNR and DXR treatment on HIF-1 activity in cultured PC-3 cells. (A) HIF-1␣levels were determined by immunoblot assay of lysates prepared from PC-3 cells that were exposed to 1% O2for 20 h in the absence (Con) or presence of 1, 5, or 10␮M DNR or DXR. (B) Hypoxia response element (HRE)-driven

Luc activity was determined in PC-3 cells. Cells were cotransfected with HRE-driven firefly Luc and controlRenillaLuc reporter plasmids and treated with DXR or DNR for 24 h at 20% (open bars) or 1% (filled bars) O2. Cells were lysed and analyzed for the ratio of firefly toRenillaLuc activity. (C) qRT-PCR assays were

performed to quantify VEGF and GLUT1 mRNA levels in PC-3 cells treated with 0.2, 1, or 5␮M DNR or DXR at 20% (open bars) or 1% (filled bars) O2for 24 h.

(6)

Table S1. Primers used for quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR

Gene Sequences

VEGF Fwd: CTTGCCTTGCTGCTCTAC

Rev: TGGCTTGAAGATGTACTCG

GLUT1 Fwd: CGGGCCAAGAGTGTGCTAAA

Rev: TGACGATACCGGAGCCAATG

HK1 Fwd: TGGAGTCCGAGGTTTATG

Rev: TTTGGATTGTTGGCAAGG

HK2 Fwd: CCAGTTCATTCACATCATCAG

Rev: CTTACACGAGGTCACATAGC

SDF1 Fwd: GTGGTCGTGCTGGTCCTC

Rev: CTCTGGCAACATGGCTTTCG

SCF Fwd: AAAGATTCCAGAGTCAGTGTC

Rev: TTCCAGTATAAGCTCCAAAAG

18 s rRNA Fwd: CGGCGACGACCCATTCGA AC

Rev: GAATCGAACCCTGATTCCCCGTC

(7)

Table S2. Primers used for the amplification of HIF-1

11–510 Sequences

Fwd: CGCGGATCCCGATGACATCAGATGATCCATCACTG Rev: ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCAGTTCTGTTTGCTGTTGCTGCTGCC

(8)

Table S3. Primers used for chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

Gene Region Sequences

VEGF ⫺531 to⫺374 Fwd: TCTTCGAGAGTGAGGACGTGTGT

Rev: AAGGCGGAGAGCCGGAC

PDK1 ⫺485 to⫺386 Fwd: CGCCCTGTCCTTGAGCC

Rev: CGGTATGGAGCGTCCCCT 550 to 646 Fwd: CGCGTTTGGATTCCGTG

Rev: CCAGTTATAATCTGCCTTCCCTATTATC

Figure

Fig. S1. Inhibition of HIF-1 transcriptional activity by anthracyclines. (A) HIF-1-dependent luciferase (Luc) activity was determined in Hep3B-c1 cells treated with 0, 0.2, or 1 ␮M idarubicin (IDA) or epirubicin (EPI) under 20% (open bars) or 1% (filled ba
Fig. S2. Mechanism of action by which anthracyclines inhibit HIF-1 activity. (A) HIF-1 ␣ protein levels were determined by immunoblot assays of lysates prepared from HEK293 cells that were cultured in the presence of 0, 1, 5, or 10 ␮M daunorubicin (DNR), d
Fig. S3. Effect of DXR and DNR on HIF-2 ␣ DNA-binding activity. HEK293 cells were exposed to 1% or 20% O 2 in the presence of vehicle (Con) or 1 mM DXR or DNR for 20 h
Fig. S4. Effect of DNR or DXR on HIF-1 activity in Hep3B-c1 cells. (A) HIF-1 ␣ protein levels were determined by immunoblot assays of lysates prepared from Hep3B-c1 cells that were exposed to hypoxia (1% O 2 , 20 h) in the presence of vehicle control (Con)
+4

References

Related documents

In this study, we found that MCMV infection of bone marrow-derived macrophages inhibited TNF- ␣ -induced ICAM-1 surface expression and mRNA expression in infected cells via

We monitored the primary humoral response to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and showed that, in addition to antibodies to p24 and gp41, antigens which form the basis

In this paper, the error bound on the efficacy at predicting path loss for seven predictive path loss models based on field strength measurement along four major

Comparative study of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic female patients attending STD outpatient department. diagnosed by wet mount and

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vpu protein interferes with an early step in the biosynthesis of major histocom- patibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. Cleavage

Hence the present study was proposed to evaluate the adverse drug reaction profile of anti-retroviral agents in HIV patients with the objectives to assess causality,

conservation biocontrol -biocontrol with immature anthocorids of potential Ecology and bioassay EPF, predators, parasitoids. Lepidoptera:

Mean ADC values were signifi - cantly lower in patients with higher TNM stage, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or sig- net-ring cell carcinoma, and in cancer with ele- vated