• No results found

Channel ROI How we do it: a step-by-step approach

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Channel ROI How we do it: a step-by-step approach"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Channel ROI

How we do it: a step-by-step approach

Providing proof of program impact and ROI can be difficult amidst the

rising number and complexity of channel programs. In this eBook, we

share strategies to determine the true lift of programs through proper

data evaluation, to identify program modifications that work for

specific partner segments and to ensure programs drive your

Go-to-Market objectives.

(2)

w w w. v i s t e x . c o m

Many technology and telecommunications vendors find themselves in the predicament of being unable to apply sound data driven management to optimize channel spend. Contributing to this challenge is the ever-increasing channel spend and complexity indirect sales programs have experienced over the last decade. Channel chiefs and their teams are under pressure to provide proof of program impact and ROI but most do not have their data in the right state to do so in a compelling manner.

With both the complexity and number of programs on the rise, it has become progressively more difficult to get a clear picture of whether partner programs, and the corresponding channel spend, deliver true revenue lift and ROI. There are multiple factors causing this dilemma:

■ A trusted, clean and integrated source of actionable data is often missing. Channel managers are faced with a higher velocity of transactions through the channel, while having to deal with a more complex set of partner programs. Getting a handle on all the different data elements needed to manage this dynamic can be daunting. Without it there is little capacity to provide the foundation for data-driven management decision making, leaving channel managers in a run-and-gun mode.

■ Gaps exist in evaluating channel program effectiveness, resulting in poor execution. Data is critical for making smart investment decisions, but evaluating the data properly can be challenging. We often see certain partner programs incorrectly correlated with higher revenues without the necessary data to identify if they are truly causing those revenues. For example, it may look like rebates are causing higher sales but this is not necessarily the case: instead of truly causing higher sales, they happen to appear in higher volume during periods of increased sales because more product is moving. Determining the true lift of program incentives is required to maximize return on incentive investment so that the channel manager has the credibility to increase or decrease program funding depending on their success.

■ Misapplying practices from one partner segment and/or geography to different areas. Performance varies by partner, region and program so it is a mistake to assume that a successful program from one geographical area or segment of partners will yield the same results in all geographies or for all partners. It is vital that programs be tailored by geography and partner type or segment to meet the unique needs of the target audience. ■ Partners expect more from channel programs wanting to collaborate on their go-to-market strategies. This ideally leads to the rollout of programs with a balanced mix of pre-sales enablement plus incentives plus post-sales rewards. However, the ability to jointly measure and evaluate the outcomes of these programs has not kept pace with their adoption.

At Vistex, we have an analytics team dedicated to helping clients solve the many issues caused by the growing complexity of channel programs. This is accomplished by integrating and analyzing critical data to inform data-driven decisions and thereby improve partner and program performance.

With both the

complexity and

number of programs

on the rise, it has

become progressively

more difficult to

get a clear picture

of whether partner

programs deliver true

lift and ROI.

(3)

Step One: Data Cleansing

We scrub, structure and aggregate the disparate data sources to lay the foundation for analysis. This data quality exercise delivers clean, trusted data that is not only easy to work with, but can be readily analyzed to identify prescriptive measures and actions to optimize program performance. This is the most important building block upon which the rest of our analysis can be carried out. It is worth noting that data quality work often consumes up to 60% of the effort, when based on raw data sources. We work collaboratively with clients to develop our own in-depth data understanding, including domain-specific data elements, definitions, hierarchies and aggregation levels so they can gain immediate value from our work.

Step Two: Segmentation and Distribution Evaluation

This is followed by a multi-step analysis beginning with Recency-Frequency-Monetary (RFM) segmentation and a Pareto revenue distribution evaluation. These analysis first rank-sort partners from most to least valuable then group them into sets representing 20% increments of revenue contribution (20%, 40%, 60%, etc…). Once this is complete, the ranked partner

Data quality work

often consumes up

to 60% of the effort,

when based on raw

data sources.

(4)

w w w. v i s t e x . c o m

Matched Control

Methodology

identifies to what

degree program

participation actually

moves the needle on

partner performance.

4

contribution to revenue is clear, laying the first step in determining where to best target incentives for maximum impact and increased sales.

Step Three: Matched Control Methodology

We then apply matched control methodology to identify the true sales lift generated by channel programs (individual and in aggregate). This isolates a single variable then splits a sample into two different groups: the analysis group that participated in the incentive and the matched control group that did not participate in the incentive. This is used, for example, to evaluate partner performance related to a rewards program, comparing two groups of similarly valuable partners – one that participates and one that does not. We compare the results for incentive participants and non-participants to identify the incentive programs that are the most effective and to what degree program participation actually moves the needle on partner performance.

(5)

Make More. Keep More. Grow Smarter.

■ Contracts

■ Pricing

■ Rebates

■ Benefits

■ Trade & Channel

■ Rights & Royalties

■ Performance Management ■ Payment Solution Sets ■ Program Strategy ■ Analytics ■ Implementation ■ Post-Production Support ■ Training ■ Global Payments ■ Program Administration Services

Vistex provides enterprise solutions that manage pricing, incentive, rebate, royalty and channel programs to enhance business performance while reducing labor and infrastructure costs. The industry-optimized Go-to-Market Suite® provides end-to-end solutions for design, management and administration of the complete spectrum of programs. With an unparalleled offering of software and services, enterprises are empowered with unprecedented visibility into program performance, gaining deeper insights to better enable fact-based decisions that drive revenue, control cost, minimize leakage, and streamline processes.

5

Step Four: Program Optimization Calculator

Lastly, we develop a “program optimization calculator” based on the model that enables clents to set up and run “what if” scenarios to test out strategic changes or modifications. Scenarios can be broad, covering a wide range of partner types and regions, or narrowed down to identify the likely outcome from a specific change to one region or program. This knowledge helps clients gauge the results of their programs before they are launched so potential issues can be identified and modifications made to maximize channel investment.

Conclusions: Actionable Insights

Our analysis provides clients the clean, actionable data needed to design simple, elegant, and scalable models to help them to gain consensus to move forward program enhancements and extensions to additional regions and partners. This is enabled by the ability to present compelling “what-if” scenarios sharing the forecast performance and financial impact of program modifications. The process described here can serve as a guide to management teams, showing them how to achieve increased profitability, and positioning them to generate growth while capitalizing on the changing nature of channel program demands.

References

Related documents

The MEP must provide the registry manager with the required metering information for each metering installation the MEP is responsible for, and update the registry metering records

Pro argument #3 (strongest argument that Pro argument #3 (strongest argument that LFCS001 English & Communication Skills LFCS001 English & Communication Skills Writing

Thus, even if one admits, on the evidence provided in Table 5, that leaving a sectoral agreement has a negative impact on worker wages (taking therefore as a comparison

The exclusion of sports and activities in the General Exclusions is deleted only with respect to cover under Medical and Other Expenses Section and under Curtailment Section

Similarly, inequality solutions are required to determine the monotonicity and concavity of functions by the use of derivative (Sandor 1997).. E-mail address:

Source: Centro Studi Auto Aziendale (excerpt from a quarterly business survey on fleet managers).. FIRE & THEFT CAR INSURANCE Ownership or financial leasing Long-term rental

2.6 Achieving pedagogical “equality” by instructional differentiation 19 3 Theory: self-regulation of learning in multilevel instructional contexts 23 3.1 Cognitive learning,

For manufacturers that transform to meet the demands of a smart, connected world, this combination of software, the cloud, and services will be the crucible of innovation and