ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slale t., jmber, and address):
_ALAN M. LASKIN, SBN 148858
BRADLEY A. SCHULTZ, SBN 242512
LAW OFFICES OF ALAN M. LASKIN
1810 S STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95811
TELEPHONE NO: 915 . 3 2 9 . 9 010 FAX NO. (Opiional): E-MAIL ADDRESS fOpf/bna/J: A L A S K I N O L A S K I N L A W . COM
AlTORNEY FOR Wame): MARCUS THOMPSON. BY & THROUGH HIS SUCCESSOR,
PLD-PI-001
9 1 6 . 4 4 2 . 0 4 4 4
KIM MERRITT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
STREETADDRESS: 7 2 0 N I N T H STREET MAILINGADDRESS:
CITYANDZIPCODE: SACRAMENTO, CA 9 5 8 1 4
BRANCH NAME: GORDON D . SCHABER COURTHOUSE
PLAINTIFF: MARCUS THOMPSON, BY AND THROUGH H I S SUCCESSOR. I N I N T E R E S T , K I M M E R R I T T , A N I N D I V I D U A L
DEFENDANT: EMILY CHEN, i n d i v i d u a l l y and dba VILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS:; E/H FIRST FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dba VILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS;, SCOTT THOMPSON, a NOMINAL DEFENDANT; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, i n c l u s i v e . .
CX_1 DOES 1 TO 1 0 0 , I N C L U S I V E
COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death r~l AMENDED (Number):
Type (check all that apply): r ~ l MOTOR VEHICLE
I I Property Damage I I Personal Injury
f x l OTHER (specify): WRONGFUL DEATH I I Wrongful Death
I X I Other Damages (specify): GENERAL
NEGLIGENCE; PREMISES LIABILITY
FOR COURT USE ONLY
. 5 Beps;l!3
li 1'
Department Assignments Case Management 44
Law and Motion 53 Minors Compromise 45
Jurisdiction (check all that apply):
ACTION IS A LIMITED CIVIL CASE
Amount demanded I I does not exceed $10,000
I I exceeds $10,000, but does not exceed $25,000 ACTION IS AN UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE (exceeds $25,000)
ACTION IS RECLASSIFIED by this amended complaint I j from limited to unlimited
r 1 from unlimited to limited
CASE NUMBER:
1.
2. 3.
Plaintiff fname ornames;.-MARCUS THOMPSON, BY AND THROUGH H I S SUCCESSOR I N I N T E R E S T , K I M M E R R I T T , A N I N D I V I D U A L
alleges causes of action against defendant fname or names/'EMILY CHEN, i n d i v i d u a l l y and dba V I L L A C A P R I
APARTMENTS; E/H FIRST FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dba VILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS; SCOTT THOMPSON
This pleading, including attachments and exhibits, consists of the following number of pages: 6Each plaintiff named above is a competent adult a. I I except plaintiff (name):
(1) I I a corporation qualified to do business in California
(2) I I an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) I I a public entity (describe):
(4) I I a minor I I an adult
(a) I I for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed
(b) I I other (specify): (5) I I oVner (specify): I I except plaintiff (name):
(1) I I a corporation qualified to do business in California an unincorporated entity (describe):
a public entity (describe): a minor I I an adult (2)
(3) (4)
(a) I I for whom a guardian or consen/ator ofthe estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed
(b) I I other (specify): (5) I I other (specify):
I ] Information about additional plaintiffs who are not competent adults is shown in Attachment 3.
Pago 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California PLD-PI-001 (Rev. January 1. 2007}
COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property
Damage, Wrongful Death
Soluffms"
PLD-PI-001
SHORT TITLE: THOMPSON V . CHEN CASE NUMBER:
4. Plaintiff (name):
is doing business under the fictitious name (specify):
and has complied with the fictitious business name laws. 5. Each defendant named above is a natural person
a. [ x ] except defendant (name): V I L L A C A P R I APARTMENTS
c. except defendant (name):
(1)
m
a business organization, form unknown (1)•
a business organization, form unknown (2)n
a corporation (2)•
a corporation(3)
L J
an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) an unincorporated entity (describe):(4)
•
a public entity (describe): (4) a public entity (describe):(5)
L J
other (specify): (5)n
other (specify):b. C x ] except defendant (name): E / H F I R S T d. I I except defendant (name):
F A M I L Y L I M I T E D PARTNERSHIP
(1)
n
a business organization, form unknown (1)n
a business organization, form unknown (2)L J
•
a corporation (2)
•
a corporation(3)
L J
•
an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) an unincorporated entity (describe):(4)
L J
a public entity (describe): (4)•
a public entity (describe):(5)
Cx]
olher (specify): L I M I T E D PARTNERSHIP (5) other (specify):I X I Information about additional defendants who are not natural persons is contained in Attachment 5. 6. The true names of defendants sued as Does are unknown to plaintiff.
a. I X I Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): 1 THROUGH 50 were the agents or employees of other named defendants and acted within the scope of that agency or employment
b. I X I Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): 5 1 THROUGH 1 0 0 are persons whose capacities are unknown to plaintiff.
7. I X I Defendants who are joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 382 are (names): SCOTT THOMPSON
8. This court is the proper court because
a. I I at least one defendant now resides in its jurisdictional area.
b. I X I the principal place of business of a defendant corporation or unincorporated association is in its jurisdictional area. c. I X I Injury to person or damage to personal property occurred in its jurisdictional area. , .
d. I I other (specify):
9. I I Plaintiff is required to comply with a claims statute, and a. I I has complied with applicable claims statutes, or
b. I I is excused from complying because (specify):
PLD-PI-001 [Rev. January 1,2007] COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property
Damage, Wrongful Death
PLD-PI-001
SHORT TITLE: THOMPSON V . CHEN
CASE NUMBER:10. The following causes of action are attached and the statements above apply to each (each coniplaint must have one or more causes of action attached):
a. I I MotorVehlcle b. I X I General Negligence
c. I I Intentional Tort
d. I I Products Liability e. I X I Premises Liability
f. C x ] Other ^spec/^J; WRONGFUL DEATH
11. Plaintiff has suffered a. I I wage loss
b. I I loss of use of property
c. I I hospital and medical expenses d. I I general damage
e. I I property damage f. I I loss of earning capacity
g. Cx] other damage (spec///;.- EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND THE LOSS OF THE LOVE, COMFORT, AND
SOCIETY OF MARCUS THOMPSON.
12. I I The damages claimed for wrongful death and the relationships of plaintiff to the deceased are a. I I listed in Attachment 12.
b. I I as follows:
13. The relief sought in this complaint is within the jurisdiction of this court.
14. Plaintiff prays for judgment for costs of suit; for such relief as is fair, just, and equitable; and for a. (1) I X I compensatory damages
(2) I I punitive damages
The amount of damages is (in cases for personal injury or wrongful death, you must check (1)):
(1) I X I according to proof (2) I I in the amount of: $ 0 . 0 0
15. I X I The paragraphs of this complaint alleged on information and belief are as follows (specify paragraph numbers):
GENERAL NEGLIGENCE (1-4) ; PREMISES L I A B I L I T Y (1-3) (5)
Date: SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
ALAN M. LASKIN. SBN 148858
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF OR ATTORNEY)
PLD-PI-001 [Rev. January 1, 2007]
COMPLAINT—Personal Inj^'ry, Property Damage, Wrongful Death
PLD-PI-001 (2)
SHORTTITLE: THOMPSON v . CHEN CASE NUMBER:
F I R S T
CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence
Page 4(number)
ATTACHMENT TO C x ] Complaint CZ] Cross - Complaint ; !
(Use a sepamte cause of action form for each cause of action.)
GN-1. Plaintiff fname;: MARCUS THOMPSON, BY AND THROUGH HIS SUCCESSOR I N INTEREST, KIM
MERRITT, AN INDIVIDUAL
alleges that defendant Cname;: EMILY CHEN, i n d i v i d u a l l y a n d dba VILLA CAPRI
APARTMENTS; E/H FIRST FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dba.VILLA CAPRI
APARTMENTS
C x ] Does 1_
to 1 0 0 . INCLUSIVE
was the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff. By the following acts or omissions to act, defendant
negligently caused the damage to plaintiff
on(cfafe;; JANUARY 1 4 , 2010
aX (place):
THE VILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS, LOCATED AT 3129 TRUSSEL WAY I N THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.
(description of reasons for liability):
DEFENDANTS, AND EACH OF THEM, NEGLIGENTLY FAILED TO PROTECT TENANTS AND VISITORS
FROM THE RISK OF INJURY DUE TO LOITERING AND FORSEABLE CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
DEFENDANTS WERE AWARE OF NUMEROUS PRIOR SIMILAR INCIDENTS AND FAILED TO TAKE
REASONABLE AND NECESSARY STEPS TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF MARCUS THOMPSON. PLAINTIFF
MARCUS THOMPSON WAS ON DEFENDANTS' PROPERTY WHEN HE WAS SHOT BY A PERSON WHO WAS
ALSO ON DEFENDANTS' PROPERTY.
AS DIRECT AND PROXIMATE RESULT OF DEFENDANTS'
MARCUS THOMPSON WAS FATALLY SHOT.
NEGLIGENT CONDUCT, PLAINTIFF
AS A FURTHER DIRECT AND PROXIMATE RESULT OF DEFENDANTS' NEGLIGENT CONDUCT,
PLAINTIFF KIM MERRITT HAS SUFFERED EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, AS WELL THE PECUNIARY
LOSS OF THE LOVE, COMFORT, AND SOCIETY OF HER SON, MARCUS THOMPSON, I N SUM AND
ACCORDING TO PROOF AT TRIAL.
Page 1 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Usa
Judicial Council of California
PLD-PI-001(2) [Rev. January 1,2007]
C A U S E O F ACTION—General Negligence
SoluiaQns'
Legal
PLD-PI-001 (4)
SHORTTITLE: THOMPSON V . CHEN
CASENUMBER:SECOND
C A U S E O F ACTION—Premises Liability
(number)
ATTACHMENT TO CxH Complaint • Cross-Complaint
(Use a sepamte cause of action fonv for each cause of action.)
Page 5_
Prem.L-1. Plaintiff Cname^:
MARCUS THOMPSON, BY AND THROUGH H I S SUCCESSOR I N INTEREST, K I M MERRITTalleges the acts of defendants were the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff:
On ^cfafe;: JANUARY 1 4 , 2010 plaintiff was injured on the following. premises in the following
lashion (description of premises and cimumstances of injury):
DEFENDANTS' LACK OF SECURITY ALLOWED MARCUS THOMPSON,^ A VISITOR, TO BE
FATALLY SHOT AND KILLED. PLAINTIFF WAS ON DEFENDANTS'; PROPERTY WHEN HE
WAS SHOT BY INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE BELIEVED TO BE SHOOTING FROM INSIDE A
CAR AT DEFENDANTS' PROPERTY. DEFENDANT WAS AWARE OF NUMEROUS PRIOR
SIMILAR INCIDENTS, YET FAILED TO TAKE THE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY
PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED.
Prem.L-2. I X I Count One-Negligence The defendants who negligently owned, maintained, managed and operated
the described premises were (names;: EMILY CHEN, i n d i v i d u a l l y a n d dba V I L L A
CAPRI APARTMENTS; E / H FIRST FAMILY L I M I T E D PARTNERSHIP dba V I L L A
CAPRI APARTMENTS
f x ] Does 1 to 100
Prem.L-3. I X I Count Two-Willful Failure to Warn [Civil Code section 846] The defendant owners who willfully
or maliciously failed to guard or warn against a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity were
(names): EMILY CHEN, i n d i v i d u a l l y a n d dba V I L L A CAPRI APARTMENTS;
E / H FIRST FAMILY L I M I T E D PARTNERSHIP dba V I L L A CAPRI APARTMENTS
n n Does 1 to 100
Plaintiff, a recreational user, was I X I an invited guest I I a paying guest.
Prem.L-4. I I Count Three-Dangerous Condition of Public Property The defendants, who owned public property
on which a dangerous condition existed were (names):
I I Does
to
a. I I The defendant public entity had I I actual I I constructive notice of the existence of the
dangerous condition in sufficient time prior to the injury to have corrected it.
b. I I The condition was created by employees of the defendant public entity.
Prem.L-5. a. I..X.I Allegations about Other Defendants The defendants who were the agents and employees of the
other defendants and acted within the scope of the agency were (names):'
C x ] Does 1
to 100
b. I I The defendants who are liable to plaintiffs for other reasons and the reasons for their liability are
• described in attachment Prem.L-5.b I I as follows (names):
Pago 1 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of Califomia
PLD-PI-001(4) (Rev. January 1.2007)
C A U S E O F ACTION—Premises Liability
Code of Civil Procedure, § 425.12
•ns-[us
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: MARCUS THOMPSON, BY AND THROUGH H I S SUCCESSOR
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: EMILY CHEN, i n d i v . & dba VILLA CAPRI APARTMENTS, ET AL.
CASE NUMBER: