• No results found

Thesis+Customer+Loyalty

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Thesis+Customer+Loyalty"

Copied!
44
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

In short, this research found that trust, commitment, conflict handling, values and In short, this research found that trust, commitment, conflict handling, values and empathy ability of the bank determine the quality of the bank-customer relationship and empathy ability of the bank determine the quality of the bank-customer relationship and loyalty of their customers. When the bank behaves trustworthily, shows commitment, loyalty of their customers. When the bank behaves trustworthily, shows commitment, hand

handle le conconfliflicts cts welwell, l, tretreat at the the cuscustomtomers ers as as supsuppospose e thethey y shoshoulduld, , firfirm-cm-custustomeomer r  relationship would be enhanced and at the same time the firm will gain more customers relationship would be enhanced and at the same time the firm will gain more customers loyalty towards their bank. However, trust drives customers’ loyalty more than the other  loyalty towards their bank. However, trust drives customers’ loyalty more than the other  dim

dimensensionions. s. ManManageagers rs and and marmarketketers ers of of banbankinking g serservicvices es in in parparticticulaular r and and serservicvicee organizations in general, should recognize the salience of these factors in their efforts to organizations in general, should recognize the salience of these factors in their efforts to   build quality relationship with customers and to manage customer relationship more   build quality relationship with customers and to manage customer relationship more

effectively. effectively.

Amine, A. (1998). Consumers’ true brand loyalty: the central role of commitment. Amine, A. (1998). Consumers’ true brand loyalty: the central role of commitment.

 Journal of Strategic Marketing,

 Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6 (4), pp. 305-19.6 (4), pp. 305-19.

Baldinger, A. and Rubinson, J. (1996). Brand-loyalty: the link between attitude and Baldinger, A. and Rubinson, J. (1996). Brand-loyalty: the link between attitude and

 behavior.

 behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 22-34.pp. 22-34.

Bang, H.

Bang, H. K., Raymond, M. A., taylor, C. R. Moon, YK., Raymond, M. A., taylor, C. R. Moon, Y. S. (2004). A comparison of service. S. (2004). A comparison of service quality dimensions conveyed in advertisements for service providers in the USA quality dimensions conveyed in advertisements for service providers in the USA and Korea,

and Korea, International Marketing  International Marketing ReviewReview,, 22 (30), pp. 309-26.22 (30), pp. 309-26.

Referenc

Referenc

(2)

Baumann, C., Burton, S., Elliott, G. and Kehr, H. M. (2007). Prediction of attitude and Baumann, C., Burton, S., Elliott, G. and Kehr, H. M. (2007). Prediction of attitude and

 behavior intentions in retail banking.

 behavior intentions in retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing  International Journal of Bank Marketing , 25, 25 (2), pp. 102-116.

(2), pp. 102-116.

Bearden, W

Bearden, W. O. and . O. and Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of Marketing Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of Marketing Scales: multi-itemScales: multi-item Measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. 2

Measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. 2ndnd ed. USA: Sageed. USA: Sage

Publications. Publications.

Beeli, A., Martin, J.D. and Quintan

Beeli, A., Martin, J.D. and Quintana, A. (2004). A a, A. (2004). A model of customer lomodel of customer loyalty in the retailyalty in the retail  banking market.

 banking market. European Journal of Marketing  European Journal of Marketing , 38 (1/2), pp. 253-275., 38 (1/2), pp. 253-275.

Bend

Bendapudapudi, i, N., N., and and BerBerryry, , L. L. L. L. (19(1997)97). . CusCustomtomersers’ ’ motmotivaivatiotion n for for maimaintaintaininningg relationship with service providers.

relationship with service providers. Journal of Retailing, Journal of Retailing, 73 (1), pp. 15-37.73 (1), pp. 15-37.

Berry, L. (1996). On great service: a framework for actions.

Berry, L. (1996). On great service: a framework for actions.  Journal of the academy of  Journal of the academy of  Marketing Science

Marketing Science, 24 (2), pp. 176., 24 (2), pp. 176.

Bhatty

Bhatty, , M., M., SkinkSkinkle, le, R., R., and Spalding, T. (2001). Redefining customer loyaltyand Spalding, T. (2001). Redefining customer loyalty, , thethe customer’s way

customer’s way. Journal of Ive. Journal of Ivey Business, 65 (3), pp.1y Business, 65 (3), pp.13-7.3-7.

Bitner, M. J. (1990) Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical Bitner, M. J. (1990) Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical

surroundings and employee responses.

surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 54 54 (2), (2), pp. pp. 69-82.69-82.

Bitner, M. J., Bernard, H. B.,

Bitner, M. J., Bernard, H. B., and Mary S. T. (1990). The serviceand Mary S. T. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents.

encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of  Journal of  Marketing,

Marketing, 54 (1), pp. 71-94.54 (1), pp. 71-94.

Blankenship, A. B., Breen, G. E. and Dutka, A. (1998). State of the Art Marketing Blankenship, A. B., Breen, G. E. and Dutka, A. (1998). State of the Art Marketing

Research. 2

Research. 2ndnded. USA: NTC Business Books.ed. USA: NTC Business Books.

Boulding, W.,

Boulding, W., Ajay K., Ajay K., Richard S., Richard S., and Zeithaml, and Zeithaml, VV. A. (1993). A. A. (1993). A

dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions.

(3)

Bowen, J. T. and Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: a strategic commitment.

Bowen, J. T. and Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: a strategic commitment. The Cornell The Cornell   Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly

 Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 44 (5), pp. 31-47., 44 (5), pp. 31-47.

Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: the effects of service quality and the mediating role Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: the effects of service quality and the mediating role

of customer satisfaction. Eur 

of customer satisfaction. Eur opean Journal of Marketing opean Journal of Marketing , 36 (7-8), pp. 811-28., 36 (7-8), pp. 811-28.

Cava

Cavana, na, R. R. YY., ., DelDelahayahaye, e, B. B. D. D. & & SekSekaraaran, n, U. U. (20(2001)01). . AppApplielied d busbusineiness ss resresearearch:ch: qualitative and quantitative

qualitative and quantitative methods. Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons.methods. Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons.

Churchill, G. A. and Peter, P. (1984). Research design effects n the reliability of rating Churchill, G. A. and Peter, P. (1984). Research design effects n the reliability of rating

scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (4), pp.

scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (4), pp. 360-75.360-75.

Coakes, S. J. & Steed, L. (2007). SPSS version 14.0 for windows. Australia: John Wiley Coakes, S. J. & Steed, L. (2007). SPSS version 14.0 for windows. Australia: John Wiley

& Sons. & Sons.

Cronin, J.,

Cronin, J., BradyBrady, M. , M. and Hult, T. (2000). Assessing the effects of and Hult, T. (2000). Assessing the effects of qualityquality, value, , value, andand cu

custstomomer er sasatitisfsfacactition on on on coconsnsumumer er bebehahaviviororal al inintetentntioions ns in in seservrvicicee environments.

environments. Journal of Retailing  Journal of Retailing , 76 (2), pp. 193-218., 76 (2), pp. 193-218. Cooper, D. R. &

Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, PSchindler, P. S. (2006). Business research . S. (2006). Business research methods 9methods 9ththed. McGraw Hill.ed. McGraw Hill.

Crosby

Crosby, L. A. & , L. A. & TTailor, J. R. (1983). ailor, J. R. (1983). Psychological commitment and Psychological commitment and itsits

effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters. effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters.  Journal of Consumer Research,

 Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (March), pp. 413-431.9 (March), pp. 413-431.

Curasi, C. and Kennedy, K. (2002). From prisoner to apostles: a typology of repeat Curasi, C. and Kennedy, K. (2002). From prisoner to apostles: a typology of repeat

 buyers and loyal customers in service business.

 buyers and loyal customers in service business. Journal of service Marketing, Journal of service Marketing, 1616 (4), pp. 322-41.

(4), pp. 322-41.

Day, G. S. (1969). A two-dimension concept of brand loyalty.

Day, G. S. (1969). A two-dimension concept of brand loyalty.  Journal of Advertising  Journal of Advertising   Research,

(4)

De vaues, D.A. (2002). Surve

De vaues, D.A. (2002). Surveys in social research. Sydney: Alys in social research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.len & Unwin.

Disney, J. (1999). Customer satisfaction and loyalty: the critical elements of service Disney, J. (1999). Customer satisfaction and loyalty: the critical elements of service

quality.

quality. TTotal Quality otal Quality Management,Management, 10 (4-5), pp. 491-98.10 (4-5), pp. 491-98.

Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships.

 Journal of Marketing 

 Journal of Marketing , 51 (2), pp. 11-27., 51 (2), pp. 11-27.

Egan, J. (2000). Drivers to relational strategies in retailing.

Egan, J. (2000). Drivers to relational strategies in retailing.  International Journal of  International Journal of   Retail & Distribution Management,

 Retail & Distribution Management, 28 (8), pp. 379-86.28 (8), pp. 379-86.

Evans, K.R. and Beltramini, R.F. (1987). A theoretical model of consumer negotiated Evans, K.R. and Beltramini, R.F. (1987). A theoretical model of consumer negotiated

 pricing: an orientation perspective.

 pricing: an orientation perspective. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 51, pp. 58-73.51, pp. 58-73. Fil

File, e, K. K. M. M. and and PrPrincince, e, R. A. R. A. (19(1993)93). . EvalEvaluatuating ing the the efeffecfectivtiveneseness s of of intinteraeractictiveve marketing.

marketing. Journal of Service Marketing  Journal of Service Marketing , 7 (3), pp. 49-58., 7 (3), pp. 49-58.

Fornel

Fornell, C., Johnsl, C., Johnson, M. D., on, M. D., AndersAnderson, E. Won, E. W., ., Cha, J., Cha, J., and Bryanand Bryant, B. E. (1996)t, B. E. (1996)TT. he. he american customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings.

american customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of  Journal of  Marketing,

Marketing, 60 (October), pp. 7-18.60 (October), pp. 7-18. Fos

Fosterter, , B., B., and and CadCadogaogan, n, J. J. (20(2000)00). . RelRelatiationsonship hip selsellinling g and and cuscustomtomer er loyloyaltyalty: : anan empirical investigation.

empirical investigation. Marketing Intelligence and Planning,Marketing Intelligence and Planning,18 (4), pp. 185-99.18 (4), pp. 185-99.

Fou

Founienierr, , S. S. (19(1998)98). . ConConsumsumer er and and thetheir ir brabrandsnds: : devedeveloploping ing relrelatiationsonship hip thetheory ory inin consumer research.

consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), pp. 343-374.24 (4), pp. 343-374.

Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., and Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., and Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers.

stayers. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 65 (3), pp. 65-87.65 (3), pp. 65-87.

Gremler, D. D., and

Gremler, D. D., and Stephen, WStephen, W. B. (1999). The . B. (1999). The loyalty ripple effect appreciating the fullloyalty ripple effect appreciating the full value of customers.

value of customers.  International Journal of Service Industry Management, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1010 (3), pp. 271-91.

(5)

Gutman, J.

Gutman, J. (1982)(1982). A means-end chain . A means-end chain model based model based on on consumeconsumer r categorcategories processesies processes..  Journal of Marketing,

 Journal of Marketing, 46 (Spring), pp. 60-72.46 (Spring), pp. 60-72.

Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of linkages between consequences and values. Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of linkages between consequences and values.

 Journal of Business Research,

 Journal of Business Research, 22 (March), pp. 60-72.22 (March), pp. 60-72.

Heskett, J. L. (2002). Beyond customer loyalty.

Heskett, J. L. (2002). Beyond customer loyalty. ManagiManaging ng Service QualityService Quality,12 (6), pp.,12 (6), pp. 355-7.

355-7.

Heskett, J., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., and Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the Heskett, J., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., and Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the

service-profit chain to work.

service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business  Harvard Business ReviewReview,, 72 (2), pp. 164-174.72 (2), pp. 164-174.

Hofmeyr, J. and Rice, B.

Hofmeyr, J. and Rice, B. (2000). Commitment-led marketing. UK: John (2000). Commitment-led marketing. UK: John Wiley & Sons.Wiley & Sons.

Huber, F., Herrmann, A. and Morgan, R. E. (2001). Gaining competitive advantage Huber, F., Herrmann, A. and Morgan, R. E. (2001). Gaining competitive advantage

through customer value oriented management.

through customer value oriented management. The Journal Marketing The Journal Marketing , 18 (1), pp., 18 (1), pp. 41-53.

41-53.

Huseyin, A., Salih, T. K., and Salime, M. S. (2005). A comparison of service quality in Huseyin, A., Salih, T. K., and Salime, M. S. (2005). A comparison of service quality in

the banking industry.

the banking industry.  Intern International Journal of ational Journal of Bank Bank MarketMarketing,ing, 23 (7), pp. 508-23 (7), pp. 508-26.

26.

Jacob, J. (1971). A model of multi-brand loyalty.

Jacob, J. (1971). A model of multi-brand loyalty.  Journa Journal l of of AdvertiAdvertising sing ResearResearchch, , 1111 (3), pp. 25-31.

(3), pp. 25-31.

Jacoby, J., and Chestnut, R. W. (1978).Brand loyalty measurement and management. Jacoby, J., and Chestnut, R. W. (1978).Brand loyalty measurement and management.

 New York: John Wiley & Son.  New York: John Wiley & Son.

Keating, B., Rugimbana, R., and Quazi, A. (2003). Differentiating between service Keating, B., Rugimbana, R., and Quazi, A. (2003). Differentiating between service

quality and relationship quality in cyberspace.

quality and relationship quality in cyberspace. Managing Service Quality,Managing Service Quality, 13 (3),13 (3),  pp. 217-32.

(6)

Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory

study.

study. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 59 (71-82).59 (71-82).

Jacoby, J. & Kyner, D. B. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior.

Jacoby, J. & Kyner, D. B. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior. Journal  Journal  of Marketing Research, Chicago

of Marketing Research, Chicago, 10 (1), pp. 1-10., 10 (1), pp. 1-10.

Jones, T. O. and Sasser, W

Jones, T. O. and Sasser, W. E. . E. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect.(1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Harvard Business  Review,

 Review, 73 (6), pp. 88-99.73 (6), pp. 88-99.

Kandampully, J. (1998). Service quality to service loyalty: a relationship which goes Kandampully, J. (1998). Service quality to service loyalty: a relationship which goes

 beyond customer services

 beyond customer services. Total Quality Management . Total Quality Management , 9 (6), pp. 431-43., 9 (6), pp. 431-43.

Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory

study.

study.  Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 59, pp. 71-82.59, pp. 71-82.

Kettinger, W. J. and Lee. C.C. (1995). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction Kettinger, W. J. and Lee. C.C. (1995). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction

with the information services function.

with the information services function. Decision Sciences, Decision Sciences, 25 (5), pp. 737-66.25 (5), pp. 737-66.

Knox, S., and Walker, D. (2001). Measuring and managing brand loyalty.

Knox, S., and Walker, D. (2001). Measuring and managing brand loyalty.  Journal of  Journal of  Strategic Marketing,

Strategic Marketing, 9 (2), pp. 9 (2), pp. 11111-28.1-28.

Kunyk, D. & Olson, J.K. (2001). Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy.

Kunyk, D. & Olson, J.K. (2001). Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy. Journal  Journal  of Advanced Nursing 

of Advanced Nursing , 35 (3), pp. 317-25., 35 (3), pp. 317-25.

Leowenthal, K.M. (1996). An introduction to psychological test ans scales. 141. Leowenthal, K.M. (1996). An introduction to psychological test ans scales. 141.

Malhotra, N.K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. and Crisp, M. (1996). Marketing research: an applied Malhotra, N.K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. and Crisp, M. (1996). Marketing research: an applied

orientation. Sydney

orientation. Sydney NSWNSW, Australi: Prentice , Australi: Prentice Hall.Hall.

Mil

Miles, es, M.BM.B. . and and HubHubermerman, A.M. an, A.M. 91991994)94). . QuaQualitlitatiative ve datdata a analanalysiysis: s: an an expexpandeandedd sourcebook. 2

(7)

Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationship between providers Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationship between providers

an

and d ususerers s of of mamarkrket et rereseseararch: ch: ththe e dydynamnamicics s of of trtrusust t wiwiththin in anand d betbetweweenen organizations.

organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing Research,29 (3), pp.314-28.29 (3), pp.314-28.

Morgan, R. and Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Morgan, R. and Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing.

 Journal of Marketing,

 Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), pp. 20-38.58 (3), pp. 20-38.

Morris, D. S., Barnes, B. R., and Lynch, J. E. (1999). Relationship marketing needs total Morris, D. S., Barnes, B. R., and Lynch, J. E. (1999). Relationship marketing needs total

quality Management.

quality Management. TTotal Quality otal Quality Management,Management, 10 (4-5), pp. 659.10 (4-5), pp. 659.

 Naceur, J. and Azaddin, K. (2005). A customized measure of service quality in the UAE.  Naceur, J. and Azaddin, K. (2005). A customized measure of service quality in the UAE.

Managing Service

Managing Service QualityQuality,, 15 (4), pp. 374-88.15 (4), pp. 374-88.

 Naresh, K., M. (1986). Consumer behavior and marketing actions.

 Naresh, K., M. (1986). Consumer behavior and marketing actions. Journal of Marketing  Journal of Marketing  Science,

Science, 11 (1), pp. 191-93.11 (1), pp. 191-93.

 Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Understanding the salience of cultural dimensions on relationship  Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Understanding the salience of cultural dimensions on relationship

marketing, it’s underpinnings and aftermaths.

marketing, it’s underpinnings and aftermaths. Cross Cultural Management,Cross Cultural Management, 1111 (3).

(3).

  Ndu

  Ndubisbisi, i, N. N. O. O. (20(2007)07). . RelRelatiationsonship hip marmarketketing ing and and cuscustomtomer er loyloyaltyalty.. Marketing Marketing   Intelligence & Planning,

 Intelligence & Planning, 25 (1), pp. 98-106.25 (1), pp. 98-106.

  Ndu

  Ndubisbisi, N. i, N. O. and O. and WWah, C.K. ah, C.K. (20(2005)05). . FacFactortorial and ial and disdiscricriminminant analyant analyses of ses of thethe underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction.

underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction. International  International   Journal of Bank Marketing,

 Journal of Bank Marketing, 23 (7), pp. 542-557.23 (7), pp. 542-557.

 Neuman, W

 Neuman, W. L. (2003). . L. (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches.quantitative approaches. 5

5ththed. Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.ed. Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.

Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases

Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response.of the satisfaction response.  Journal of Consumer Research,

(8)

Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence

Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty?.consumer loyalty?. Journal of Merketing, Journal of Merketing, 63, pp.33-44.63, pp.33-44.

Ols

Olsen, en, S. S. (20(2002)02). . ComComparparatiative ve evalevaluatuation ion and and the the relrelatiationsonship hip betbetweeween n qualqualityity,, satisfaction and

satisfaction and repurchase loyaltyrepurchase loyalty.. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 30 (3), pp. 240-9.

(3), pp. 240-9.

Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer  Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer 

Value.

Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), pp. 154-61., 25 (2), pp. 154-61.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and . A. and BerryBerry, L. , L. L. (1985). A conceptual model L. (1985). A conceptual model of serviceof service quality and its implications for future research.

quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), pp.49 (4), pp. 41-50.

41-50.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item

scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.

scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing  Journal of Retailing ,, 64, pp. 12-40.

64, pp. 12-40.

Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the

quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda.

loyalty chain: a research agenda. Journa Journal l of the of the Academy of Academy of MarketMarketing Scienceing Science,, 28 (1), pp. 168-74.

28 (1), pp. 168-74.

Park, C.,

Park, C., and and Kim, YKim, Y. . (2003)(2003). . IdentIdentifyiifying ng key key factofactors rs affeaffecting consumer purchasecting consumer purchase   be

  behavihavior or in in an an onlonline ine shoshoppipping ng contcontextext..  In  Interternatinational onal JouJournal rnal of of RetRetail ail &&  Distribution Management,

 Distribution Management, 31 (1), pp. 69-29.31 (1), pp. 69-29.

Pre

Pressesseyy, , A. A. D., D., and and MatMathewhews, s, B. B. PP. . (20(2000)00). . BarBarrieriers rs to to relrelatiationsonship hip marmarketketing ing inin consumer retailing.

consumer retailing. Journal of Services Marketing, Journal of Services Marketing, 14 (3), pp. 272-86.14 (3), pp. 272-86.

Pritchard, M., Havitz, M. and Howard, D. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty Pritchard, M., Havitz, M. and Howard, D. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty

link in service contexts.

link in service contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (3), pp., 27 (3), pp. 333-48.

(9)

Pruitt, D.G. (1981).

Pruitt, D.G. (1981). Negotiation Behaviour. New YNegotiation Behaviour. New York:Academic Press Inc.ork:Academic Press Inc.

Ranchhod, A. and Zhou, F. (2001). Comparing respondents of e-mail and mail surveys: Ranchhod, A. and Zhou, F. (2001). Comparing respondents of e-mail and mail surveys:

understanding the

understanding the implications of technologimplications of technologyy.. Marketing Intelligence and Marketing Intelligence and   Planning 

 Planning , 19 (4), pp. 254-62., 19 (4), pp. 254-62.

Raymond, M.A. and Rylance, W. (1995). Evaluation and management of professional Raymond, M.A. and Rylance, W. (1995). Evaluation and management of professional

services in Korea.

services in Korea. Advances in International Marketing, Advances in International Marketing, 7, pp. 7, pp. 11111-15.1-15.

Reichheld, F. and Aspinall, K. (1993). Building high-loyalty business systems.

Reichheld, F. and Aspinall, K. (1993). Building high-loyalty business systems.  Journal  Journal  of Retail Banking,

of Retail Banking, 15 (4), pp. 21-9.15 (4), pp. 21-9.

Reichheld, F. (1996). Learning from customer defections.

Reichheld, F. (1996). Learning from customer defections. Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business Review, 7474 (2), pp. 56-69.

(2), pp. 56-69.

Reichheld, F. F., and Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero defections: quality comes to services. Reichheld, F. F., and Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero defections: quality comes to services.

 Harvard Business

 Harvard Business ReviewReview,, 68 (5), pp. 105-11.68 (5), pp. 105-11.

Reichheld, F. F.(2003). The one number you need to grow.

Reichheld, F. F.(2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review Harvard Business Review, 81, 81 (12), pp. 46-54.

(12), pp. 46-54.

Reichheld, F. and Schefter, P

Reichheld, F. and Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty: your secret . (2000). E-loyalty: your secret weapon on weapon on the web.the web. Harvard  Harvard   Business Review

 Business Review, 78 (4), pp. 105-13., 78 (4), pp. 105-13.

Tyan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In Tyan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In handbook of qualitative research, USA” Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. handbook of qualitative research, USA” Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. Sage Publications.

Sage Publications.

Sekaran, U. (2004). Research method for business: a skill building approach. New York: Sekaran, U. (2004). Research method for business: a skill building approach. New York:

John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons.

(10)

Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and consequence of trust and satisfaction in buyer-seller  Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and consequence of trust and satisfaction in buyer-seller 

relationship.

relationship. European Journal of Marketing  European Journal of Marketing , 32 (3), pp. 305-22., 32 (3), pp. 305-22.

Shanker, V,. Smith, A., and Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty Shanker, V,. Smith, A., and Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty

in

in onlonline ine and and ofofflifline ne envenviroironmenmentsnts..   In  Interternatnationional al JouJournal rnal of of ResResearearch ch inin Marketing,

Marketing, 20 (2), pp. 153-75.20 (2), pp. 153-75.

Sirdeshmukh, D. S.,

Sirdeshmukh, D. S., J. and J. and Sabol, B. (2002). Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value,Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges.

and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 66 (15-37).66 (15-37).

Slater, S. (1997). Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm.

Slater, S. (1997). Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm. Journal of the Journal of the  Academy of Marketing Science

 Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), pp. 162-7., 25 (2), pp. 162-7.

Srinivasan, S., Anderson, R., and Ponnavolu (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an Srinivasan, S., Anderson, R., and Ponnavolu (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an

exploration of its antecedents and consequences.

exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, Journal of Retailing, 78 (1), pp.78 (1), pp. 41-50.

41-50.

Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T. and Gronross, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T. and Gronross, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships

for profit: the dynamics of relationship quality.

for profit: the dynamics of relationship quality.  International Journal of Service International Journal of Service  Industry Management,

 Industry Management, 5 (5), pp. 21-38.5 (5), pp. 21-38.

Tepeci, M. (1999). Increasing Brand Loyalty in the Hospitality Industry.

Tepeci, M. (1999). Increasing Brand Loyalty in the Hospitality Industry.  International  International   Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,

 Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11 (5), pp. 223-9.11 (5), pp. 223-9.

V

Vandermerwe, S. (2003). andermerwe, S. (2003). Customer-minded growth through Customer-minded growth through services.services. Managing ServiceManaging Service Quality

Quality, 13 (4), pp. 262-6., 13 (4), pp. 262-6.

White, S. and Schneider, B. (2000). Climbing the commitment ladder: the role of  White, S. and Schneider, B. (2000). Climbing the commitment ladder: the role of 

expectations disconfirmation on consumers’ behavioral intentions.

expectations disconfirmation on consumers’ behavioral intentions.   Journal of   Journal of  Service Research,

Service Research, 2 (3), pp. 240-53.2 (3), pp. 240-53.

Wilkie, W

(11)

Wong, A. and Sohal, A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between trust, Wong, A. and Sohal, A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between trust,

commi

commitment tment and and relatrelationshiionship p qualitqualityy..   Int  Internaernatiotional nal JourJournal nal of of RetRetail ail and and   Distribution Management,

 Distribution Management, 30 (1), pp. 34-50.30 (1), pp. 34-50.

W

Wong, A., and Sohal, A. (2003). ong, A., and Sohal, A. (2003). Service quality and customer Service quality and customer loyalty perspective on twoloyalty perspective on two levels of retail relationship.

levels of retail relationship. Journal of Service Marketing, Journal of Service Marketing, 17 (5), pp. 495-513.17 (5), pp. 495-513.

V

Vavra, Tavra, T. G. (1992). After marketing: ho. G. (1992). After marketing: how to keep w to keep customers for life through customers for life through relationshiprelationship marketing. Homewood: Business One Irwin.

marketing. Homewood: Business One Irwin.

Zeithaml, V

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry. A., Berry, L. , L. L., and L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behParasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioralavioral consequences of

consequences of service qualityservice quality.. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 60 (April), pp. 31-46.60 (April), pp. 31-46.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation process differ between goods and Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation process differ between goods and

servi

services. ces. In In ServiServices ces marketmarketing ing ProcProceedingseedings. . ChicagChicago: American o: American MarkeMarketingting Association.

Association.

Zeit

Zeithamhaml, l, VV. . A. A. (20(2000)00). . SerServicvice e qualqualityity, , proprofitfitabiabilitlityy, , and and the the ecoeconominomic c worworth th of of  customers: what we know and what we need to learn.

customers: what we know and what we need to learn.  Journal of the Academy of  Journal of the Academy of  Marketing Science,

Marketing Science, 28 (1), pp. 67-85.28 (1), pp. 67-85.

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences

of service quality.

of service quality. Journal of Marketing  Journal of Marketing , 60, pp. 31-46., 60, pp. 31-46.

Zikmund, W. (2000).

Zikmund, W. (2000). Business Research Methods Business Research Methods, 6th edn, The Dryden Press, Harcourt, 6th edn, The Dryden Press, Harcourt College Publishers.

(12)

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

(13)

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

PART 1 PART 1

 DEMOGRAPHIC. ( Choose the suitable answer and tick 

 DEMOGRAPHIC. ( Choose the suitable answer and tick 

 

 

in the box given for eachin the box given for each question. question. 1 1.. GGeennddeer  r   Male Female Male Female 2 2.. AAggee Below

Below 20 20 years years 20 20 – – 39 39 yearsyears

40

40 – – 59 59 years years 60 years 60 years and and aboveabove

3

3.. RRaaccee

Malay Chinese

Malay Chinese

IInnddiiaann OOtthheerrss

4

4.. RReelliiggiioonn

(14)

H

Hiinndduu OOtthheerrss

5.

5. HigHigheshest edut educatcationional qal qualualifiificatcationion

Primary Secondary

Primary Secondary

H

HSSCC//DDiipplloomma a DDeeggrreeee

Postgraduate Others

Postgraduate Others

6

6.. OOccccuuppatatiioonn

Government

Government Sector Sector Private Private Sector Sector 

Own

Own Business Business StudentStudent

Others Others

7.

7. MMonontthlhly Iy Incncomomee

Be

Belolow w RM RM 202000 00 RM RM 202000 00 – – RM RM 39399999

R

(15)

PART 11 PART 11

Choose the statement which u thinks accurate and circle the score provided for each Choose the statement which u thinks accurate and circle the score provided for each question given. question given. Strongly Strongly Disagree Disagree D

Diissaaggrreeee NNo o OOppiinniioonn AAggrreeee SSttrroonnggllyy Agree Agree

1 2 3

1 2 3 44 55

1.

1. The bank is The bank is very concern wvery concern with securityith security

ffoor r mmy y ttrraannssaaccttiioonns s 11 22 33 44 55 2

2. . TThhe e bbaannkk’’s s pprroommiissees s aarre e rreelliiaabblle e 11 22 33 44 55 3.

3. The bank is The bank is consistent in consistent in providing qualityproviding quality

sseerrvviiccee 11 22 33 44 55

4. Employee of the bank show respect to 4. Employee of the bank show respect to

ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55

5

5. . TThhe e bbaannk k ffuullffiilllls s iitts s oobblliiggaattiioon n tto o ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55 6

6. . I I hhaavve e ccoonnffiiddeenncce e iin n tthhe e bbaannkk’’s s sseerrvviicceess 11 22 33 44 55 7

7. . TThhe e bbaannk k mmaakkees s aaddjjuussttmmeennt t tto o ssuuiit t mmy y nneeeeddss 11 22 33 44 55 8. The bank offers personalized services to meet

8. The bank offers personalized services to meet

ccuussttoommeerr’’ss nneeeedd 11 22 33 44 55 9. The bank is flexible when its services are

9. The bank is flexible when its services are

cchhaannggeedd 11 22 33 44 55

1

100. . TThhe e bbaannk k iis s fflleexxiibblle e iin n sseerrvviinng g mmy y nneeeeddss 11 22 33 44 55 11.

11. Services of the bank are in line with ourServices of the bank are in line with our social values

(16)

12. Services of the bank are consistent with 12. Services of the bank are consistent with

m

myy ppeerrssoonnaall vvaalluueess 11 22 33 44 55 13. Services of the bank are consistent with

13. Services of the bank are consistent with m

myy lliiffeeggooaallss 11 22 33 44 55

1

144. . MMy y bbaannk k vvaalluue e mme e aas s a a ccuussttoommeerr 11 22 33 44 55 15. Service of this bank contributed to the

15. Service of this bank contributed to the w

weellffaarre e oof f tthhe e ssoocciieettyy 11 22 33 44 55 16. Employees of the bank deal with customer’s

16. Employees of the bank deal with customer’s

iinnaa ccaarriinngg ffaasshhiioonn 11 22 33 44 55 17. Bank employee’s give the individualized

17. Bank employee’s give the individualized

aatttteennttiioon n tto o ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55

18. The employees of the bank understand your  18. The employees of the bank understand your 

ssppeecciiffiicc nneeeeddss 11 22 33 44 55 19. Bank employees have

19. Bank employees have the customer’s bestthe customer’s best

iinntteerreesstt aatt hheeaarrtt 11 22 33 44 55 20. Bank has operating hours convenient to all its

20. Bank has operating hours convenient to all its

ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55

2

211. . TThhe e bbaannk k ttrriiees s tto o aavvooiid d ppootteennttiiaal l ccoonnfflliicctt 11 22 33 44 55 22. The bank tries to solve manifest conflicts

22. The bank tries to solve manifest conflicts b

beeffoorre e tthheey y ccrreeaatte e pprroobblleemmss 11 22 33 44 55 23. The bank has the

23. The bank has the ability to openly discussability to openly discuss

ssoolluuttiioonns s wwhheen n pprroobblleem m aarriissee 11 22 33 44 55 2

244. . TThhe e bbaannk k iis s rreessppoonnssiivve e tto o mmy y ccoommppllaaiinnttss 11 22 33 44 55 25. The service provider shows a sincere

25. The service provider shows a sincere interestinterest

iin n ssoollvviinng g ccuussttoommeer r pprroobblleemm 11 22 33 44 55 26. Considering the bank as first choice among

26. Considering the bank as first choice among other banks in the area; and the bank that first other banks in the area; and the bank that first comes to my mind when making purchases comes to my mind when making purchases d

deecciissiioon n oon n bbaannk k sseerrvviicceess.. 11 22 33 44 55 27. If I had to do it over again, I would still

27. If I had to do it over again, I would still

(17)

28. I do not like to change to another bank  28. I do not like to change to another bank 

b

beeccaauusse e I I vvaalluue e tthhe e sseelleecctteed d bbaannk k 11 22 33 44 55 2

299. . I I aam m a a ccuussttoommeer r llooyyaalltty y tto o mmy y bbaannkk 11 22 33 44 55 30. I would always recommend my bank to

30. I would always recommend my bank to

ssoommeeoonne e wwhho o sseeeekks s my my aaddvviiccee 11 22 33 44 55

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX B

(18)

RELIABILITY 

RELIABILITY 

(19)

Customer's Loyalty

Customer's Loyalty

Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics ..99001 1 ..99001 1 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Al

Alpha pha BasedBased on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N N oof f IItteemmss Ite

Item-Tm-Total Statisticsotal Statistics

1 155..550 0 1100..11335 5 ..77330 0 ..888855 1 155..557 7 99..22883 3 ..77665 5 ..887766 1 155..550 0 88..99223 3 ..88003 3 ..886688 1 155..444 4 88..66886 6 ..88006 6 ..886688 1 155..555 5 1100..22993 3 ..66777 7 ..889955 Customer's Loyalty 26 Customer's Loyalty 26 Customer's Loyalty 27 Customer's Loyalty 27 Customer's Loyalty 28 Customer's Loyalty 28 Customer's Loyalty 29 Customer's Loyalty 29 Customer's Loyalty 30 Customer's Loyalty 30

Scale Mean if  Scale Mean if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if  Variance if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted

Trust Dimension

Trust Dimension

(20)

Re

Reliability Sliability Statisticstatistics

..88556 6 ..88559 9 66 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N oN of f IItteemmss Ite

Item-Tm-Total Statisticsotal Statistics

1 199..229 9 99..77226 6 ..66996 6 ..882222 1 199..445 5 99..99113 3 ..66888 8 ..882244 1 199..555 5 99..66551 1 ..66660 0 ..882288 1 199..552 2 1100..00118 8 ..55001 1 ..886622 1 199..336 6 99..88668 8 ..66775 5 ..882266 1 199..338 8 99..88330 0 ..66669 9 ..882277 Trust 1 Trust 1 Trust 2 Trust 2 Trust 3 Trust 3 Trust 4 Trust 4 Trust 5 Trust 5 Trust 6 Trust 6

Scale Mean if  Scale Mean if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if  Variance if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Alpha if IItemtem

Deleted Deleted

Commitment Dimension

Commitment Dimension

Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics ..88558 8 ..88558 8 44 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N N oof f IItteemmss

(21)

Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 111..112 2 55..99228 8 ..66003 3 ..885588 1 111..002 2 55..11775 5 ..77446 6 ..880000 1 111..009 9 55..44773 3 ..77330 0 ..880077 1 111..112 2 55..66007 7 ..77335 5 ..880066 Commitment 7 Commitment 7 Commitment 8 Commitment 8 Commitment 9 Commitment 9 Comm Commitment 1itment 1 00

Scale Mean if  Scale Mean if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if  Variance if  IItem Deletetem Delete dd

Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted

Conflict Handling Dimension

Conflict Handling Dimension

Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics ..88669 9 ..88669 9 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N N oof f IItteemmss Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 155..449 9 88..33883 3 ..77551 1 ..882266 1 155..338 8 88..22007 7 ..77887 7 ..881177 1 155..441 1 88..55222 2 ..77113 3 ..883366 1 155..440 0 88..99771 1 ..55880 0 ..887700 1 155..449 9 99..33003 3 ..66442 2 ..885533 Conflict Handling 11 Conflict Handling 11 Conflict Handling 12 Conflict Handling 12 Conflict Handling 13 Conflict Handling 13 Conflict Handling 14 Conflict Handling 14 Conflict Handling 15 Conflict Handling 15

Scale Mean if  Scale Mean if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if  Variance if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted

(22)

V

Values

alues Dimension

Dimension

Re

Reliability Sliability Statisticstatistics

..88336 6 ..88338 8 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N oN of f IItteemmss Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 144..002 2 88..77222 2 ..66114 4 ..881100 1 133..999 9 88..44445 5 ..66665 5 ..779966 1 144..224 4 88..44331 1 ..66999 9 ..778866 1 144..334 4 88..55447 7 ..77229 9 ..778800 1 144..225 5 99..22338 8 ..44997 7 ..884422 Values 16 Values 16 Values 17 Values 17 Values 18 Values 18 Values 19 Values 19 Values 20 Values 20

Scale Mean if  Scale Mean if  IItem Deletetem Delete dd

Scale Scale Variance if  Variance if  IItem Deletetem Delete dd

Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted

Empathy Dimension

Empathy Dimension

Re

Reliability Sliability Statisticstatistics

..88555 5 ..88556 6 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N oN of f IItteemmss

(23)

Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 155..338 8 88..11449 9 ..55773 3 ..884488 1 155..335 5 88..00997 7 ..66444 4 ..883333 1 155..339 9 77..22776 6 ..77444 4 ..880055 1 155..333 3 77..22331 1 ..66774 4 ..882255 1 155..330 0 77..00331 1 ..77220 0 ..881111 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 11 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 22 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 33 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 44 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 55

Scale Mean if  Scale Mean if  Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if  Variance if  IItem Deletetem Delete dd

Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted

CORRELATIONS

CORRELATIONS

(24)
(25)

Correlations Correlations

1

1

..666633*** *

..558888*** *

..558855*** *

..772200*** *

..772200****

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..000000

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

113388

..666633*** *

1

1

..667711*** *

..662211*** *

..666611*** *

..667744****

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..000000

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

113388

..558888*** *

..667711*** *

1

1

..666655*** *

..663311*** *

..668811****

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..000000

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

113388

..558855*** *

..662211*** *

..666655*** *

1

1

..772299*** *

..668899****

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..000000

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

113388

..772200*** *

..666611*** *

..663311*** *

..772299*** *

1

1

..774444****

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..000000

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

113388

..772200*** *

..667744*** *

..668811*** *

..668899*** *

..774444*** *

11

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..00000

0

..000000

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

11338

8

113388

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

NN

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

NN

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

NN

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

NN

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

NN

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

Sig. (2-tailed)

NN

Trust

Trust

Commitment

Commitment

Conflict Handling

Conflict Handling

Values

Values

Empathy

Empathy

Customer Loyalty

Customer Loyalty

TrTrus

ust t Co

Commmmititmmen

entt

Conflict_ 

Conflict_ 

HHan

andldliing

ng

VValaluues

es EEmmppatathhyy

Customer_ 

Customer_ 

Loyalty

Loyalty

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

**.**.

More free assignment, please visit:

(26)

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

REGRESSION

REGRESSION

(27)

Model Summary Model Summarybb .829 .829aa ..66887 7 ..66775 5 ..443333118 8 11..777722 Model Model 1 1 R R R R SSqquuaarree Adjusted Adjusted R Square R Square Std. Error of  Std. Error of  the Estimate the Estimate Durbin-Watson Watson Predictors: (Constant), Empathy, Conflict_Handling, Commitment, Trust, Predictors: (Constant), Empathy, Conflict_Handling, Commitment, Trust, Values

Values a.

a.

Dependent

Dependent Variable: CustomVariable: Customer_Loyaltyer_Loyalty b. b. ANOVA ANOVAbb 5 544..33006 6 5 5 1100..88661 1 5577..88882 2 ..000000aa 2 244..77669 9 11332 2 ..118888 7 799..00775 5 113377 Regression Regression Residual Residual Total Total Model Model 1 1 Sum of  Sum of  S

Sqquuaarrees s ddf f MMeeaan n SSqquuaarre e FF Sig.Sig.

Predictors: (Constan

Predictors: (Constan t), Empathy, Conflict_Ht), Empathy, Conflict_Handling, andling, CommCommitment, Trust, itment, Trust, ValuesValues a.

a.

Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty b. b. Coefficients Coefficientsaa --..22112 2 ..22550 0 --..88449 9 ..339977 ..33227 7 ..00993 3 ..22666 6 33..55115 5 ..00001 1 ..44115 5 22..441111 ..11008 8 ..00775 5 ..11009 9 11..44333 3 ..11554 4 ..44113 3 22..442233 ..11999 9 ..00777 7 ..11990 0 22..55772 2 ..00111 1 ..44336 6 22..229955 ..11772 2 ..00882 2 ..11663 3 22..11001 1 ..00338 8 ..33993 3 22..554466 ..22773 3 ..00996 6 ..22443 3 22..88334 4 ..00005 5 ..33224 4 33..008877 (Constant) (Constant) Trust Trust Commitment Commitment Conflict_Handling Conflict_Handling Values Values Empathy Empathy Model Model 1 1 B B SSttdd. . EErrrroor  r   Unstandardized Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients Beta Beta Standardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients t

t SSiigg. . TToolleerraanncce e VVIIFF Collinearity Statistics Collinearity Statistics

Dependent

Dependent Variable: Customer_LoyaltyVariable: Customer_Loyalty a. a. Collinearity Diagnostics Collinearity Diagnosticsaa 5 5..99332 2 11..00000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..0000 ..00223 3 1166..00669 9 ..663 3 ..001 1 ..110 0 ..002 2 ..009 9 ..0000 ..00116 6 1199..22778 8 ..000 0 ..002 2 ..550 0 ..000 0 ..444 4 ..0022 ..00113 3 2211..33115 5 ..005 5 ..113 3 ..001 1 ..668 8 ..000 0 ..1144 ..00110 0 2244..88112 2 ..228 8 ..223 3 ..338 8 ..229 9 ..226 6 ..1100 ..00007 7 3300..00660 0 ..003 3 ..661 1 ..001 1 ..000 0 ..221 1 ..7733 Dimension Dimension 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Model Model 1 1 Eigenvalue Eigenvalue Condition Condition IIn dn de x e x ( C( Co no nsst at annt ) t ) T rT ruus t s t C oC ommmmiittmme ne ntt Conflict_  Conflict_  H Ha na nd ld liin g n g VVa la luue s e s EEmmp ap atth yh y Variance Proportions Variance Proportions

Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty a.

(28)

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

NORMALITY 

NORMALITY 

(29)

Case Proce

Case Proce ssing Summassing Summaryry

1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% Trust Trust Commitment Commitment Conflict_Handling Conflict_Handling Values Values Empathy Empathy Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty N

N PPeerrcceennt t N N PPeerrcceennt t N N PPeerrcceenntt V

Vaalliid d MMiissssiinng g TToottaall Cases

Cases

Descriptives Descriptives

S

Sttaattiissttiicc SSttdd. . EErrrroor  r   Trust

Trust MeanMean 33..88885533 ..0055226633 95% Confidence

95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean

Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.78123.7812 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.9893 3.9893 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.92273.9227 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .382.382 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .61832.61832 Minimum Minimum 2.002.00 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.003.00 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range .58.58 Skewness Skewness --11..001122 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis 11..332211 ..441100 Commitment

Commitment MeanMean 33..66995577 ..0066552299 95% Confidence

95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean

Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.56653.5665 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.8248 3.8248 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.71543.7154 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .588.588 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .76698.76698 Minimum Minimum 1.501.50 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.503.50 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.061.06 Skewness Skewness --..338833 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..444466 ..441100

(30)

Conflict_Handling

Conflict_Handling MeanMean 33..88558800 ..0066116688 95% Confidence

95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean

Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.73603.7360 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.9799 3.9799 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.88823.8882 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .525.525 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .72463.72463 Minimum Minimum 2.002.00 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.003.00 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..558844 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..330055 ..441100 Values

Values MeanMean 33..55442200 ..0066114444 95% Confidence

95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean

Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.42053.4205 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.6635 3.6635 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.56753.5675 Median Median 3.60003.6000 Variance Variance .521.521 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .72180.72180 Minimum Minimum 1.601.60 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.403.40 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..552211 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..112266 ..441100 Empathy

Empathy MeanMean 33..88337777 ..0055774477 95% Confidence

95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean

Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.72403.7240 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.9513 3.9513 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.87073.8707 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .456.456 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .67513.67513 Minimum Minimum 1.801.80 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.203.20 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..668833 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis ..115599 ..441100

(31)

Customer_Loyalty

Customer_Loyalty MeanMean 33..88778833 ..0066446677 95% Confidence

95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean

Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.75043.7504 Upper Bound Upper Bound 4.0061 4.0061 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.91423.9142 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .577.577 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .75973.75973 Minimum Minimum 1.601.60 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.403.40 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..770011 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..004455 ..441100 Tests of Normality Tests of Normality ..11990 0 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99220 0 11338 8 ..000000 ..11661 1 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99664 4 11338 8 ..000011 ..11665 5 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99551 1 11338 8 ..000000 ..11443 3 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99663 3 11338 8 ..000011 ..11444 4 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99554 4 11338 8 ..000000 ..11558 8 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99443 3 11338 8 ..000000 Trust Trust Commitment Commitment Conflict_Handling Conflict_Handling Values Values Empathy Empathy Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty S

Sttaattiissttiic c ddf f SSiigg. . SSttaattiissttiic c ddf f SSiigg.. Kolmogorov-Smirnov

Kolmogorov-Smirnovaa Shapiro-WilkShapiro-Wilk

Lilliefors Significance Correction Lilliefors Significance Correction a.

(32)

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

ONE WAY 

ONE WAY 

(33)

Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 995 5 33..7788111 1 ..772255886 6 ..007744447 7 33..6633332 2 33..9922889 9 11..660 0 44..8800 331 1 33..9999335 5 ..887755557 7 ..115577226 6 33..6677224 4 44..3311447 7 22..220 0 55..0000 112 2 44..3355000 0 ..448833336 6 ..113399553 3 44..0044229 9 44..6655771 1 33..660 0 55..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Malay Malay Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Total Total N

N MMeaean n SStdtd. . DeDevviiatatiion on SStdtd. . EErrrror or LoLowwer er BBouound nd UUpppper er BBououndnd 95% Confidence Interval for  95% Confidence Interval for 

Mean Mean

Mi

Minimnimum um MaxMaximimumum

Test of Homogeneity of Variances Test of Homogeneity of Variances Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 2 2..99558 8 2 2 11335 5 ..005555 Levene Levene S

Sttaattiissttiic c ddff1 1 ddff2 2 SSiigg..

ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 3 3..99880 0 2 2 11..99990 0 33..55778 8 ..003311 7 755..00995 5 11335 5 ..555566 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of  Sum of  S

(34)

Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 995 5 33..7788111 1 ..772255886 6 ..007744447 7 33..6633332 2 33..9922889 9 11..660 0 44..8800 331 1 33..9999335 5 ..887755557 7 ..115577226 6 33..6677224 4 44..3311447 7 22..220 0 55..0000 112 2 44..3355000 0 ..448833336 6 ..113399553 3 44..0044229 9 44..6655771 1 33..660 0 55..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Islam Islam Buddha Buddha Hindu Hindu Total Total N

N MMeaean n StStd. d. DeDeviviatatiion on StStd. d. ErErroror r LoLowwer er BBouound nd UUpppper er BoBounundd 95% Confidence Interval for  95% Confidence Interval for 

Mean Mean

Mi

Minimnimum um MaxMaximimumum

T

Te

e st of Homogene

st of Homogene ity

ity of Varia

of Variances

nces

Customer_Loyalty

Customer_Loyalty

2

2..9

95

58

8

2

2

1

13

35

5

..0

05

55

5

Levene

Levene

S

Stta

attiis

sttiic

c

d

dff1

1

d

dff2

2

S

Siig

g..

ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 3 3..99880 0 2 2 11..99990 0 33..55778 8 ..003311 7 755..00995 5 11335 5 ..555566 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of  Sum of  S

(35)

Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 770 0 33..7799443 3 ..775588331 1 ..009900664 4 33..6611335 5 33..9977551 1 11..660 0 55..0000 556 6 33..9966007 7 ..775577443 3 ..110011222 2 33..7755779 9 44..1166336 6 11..880 0 55..0000 110 0 33..8888000 0 ..779955554 4 ..225511557 7 33..3311009 9 44..4444991 1 22..660 0 55..0000 2 2 44..5500000 0 ..770077111 1 ..550000000 0 --11..8855331 1 1100..8855331 1 44..000 0 55..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Below than RM2000 Below than RM2000 RM2000 till RM3999 RM2000 till RM3999 RM4001 till RM5999 RM4001 till RM5999 RM6000 and above RM6000 and above Total Total N

N MMeaean n StStd. d. DeDeviviatatioion n SStdtd. . ErErroror r LoLowwer er BoBounund d UUpppper er BoBounundd 95% Confidence Interval for  95% Confidence Interval for 

Mean Mean

Min

Minimum imum MaxMaximuimumm

T

Te

e st of Homogene

st of Homogene ity

ity of Varia

of Variance

nce s

s

Customer_Loyalty

Customer_Loyalty

..0

06

60

0

3

3

1

13

34

4

..9

98

81

1

Levene

Levene

S

Stta

attiis

sttiic

c

d

dff1

1

d

dff2

2

S

Siig

g..

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 1 1..66447 7 3 3 ..55449 9 ..99550 0 ..441188 7 777..44227 7 11334 4 ..557788 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of  Sum of  S

(36)

Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 1 1 44..0000000 0 . . . . . . . . 44..000 0 44..0000 113 3 33..5533885 5 ..775544447 7 ..220099225 5 33..0088225 5 33..9999444 4 22..440 0 44..8800 330 0 33..8866667 7 ..772266551 1 ..113322664 4 33..5599554 4 44..1133779 9 22..440 0 55..0000 778 8 33..9900551 1 ..776611990 0 ..008866227 7 33..7733333 3 44..0077669 9 11..880 0 55..0000 114 4 44..0044229 9 ..888888114 4 ..223377337 7 33..5533001 1 44..5555557 7 11..660 0 55..0000 2 2 44..0000000 0 ..000000000 0 ..000000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..000 0 44..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Primary Primary Secondary Secondary HSC/Diploma HSC/Diploma Degree Degree Postgraduate Postgraduate Others Others Total Total N

N MMeaean n StStd. d. DeDeviviatatioion n StStd. d. ErErroror r LoLowwer er BoBounund d UUpppper er BoBounundd 95% Confidence Interval for  95% Confidence Interval for 

Mean Mean

Mi

Minimnimum um MaMaxiximumumm

Test of Homogene

Test of Homogene ity ity of Variancesof Variances Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty .918 .918aa 4 4 11332 2 ..445566 Levene Levene S

Sttaattiissttiic c ddff1 1 ddff2 2 SSiigg..

Groups w

Groups with only one case are ith only one case are ignored inignored in com

computing the puting the test of homogeneity of test of homogeneity of  variance for

variance for CustomCustomer_Loyalty.er_Loyalty. a.

a.

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 1 1..99885 5 5 5 ..33997 7 ..66880 0 ..663399 7 777..00990 0 11332 2 ..558844 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of  Sum of  S

(37)

Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 3 3 33..5533333 3 ..446611888 8 ..226666667 7 22..3388660 0 44..6688007 7 33..000 0 33..8800 880 0 33..8899550 0 ..775599773 3 ..008844994 4 33..7722559 9 44..0066441 1 11..880 0 55..0000 8 8 44..0077550 0 ..339999111 1 ..114411111 1 33..7744113 3 44..4400887 7 33..440 0 44..8800 444 4 33..8822773 3 ..885500227 7 ..112288118 8 33..5566888 8 44..0088558 8 11..660 0 55..0000 3 3 44..0000000 0 ..000000000 0 ..000000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..000 0 44..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Goverment Goverment Private Private Own Business Own Business Student Student Others Others Total Total N

N MMeaean n SStdtd. . DeDevviiatatiion on SStdtd. . EErrrror or LoLowwer er BBouound nd UUpppper er BBououndnd 95% Confidence Interval for  95% Confidence Interval for 

Mean Mean

Mi

Minimnimum um MaxMaximimumum

T

Te

e st of Homogene

st of Homogene ity

ity of Varia

of Variance

nce s

s

Customer_Loyalty

Customer_Loyalty

3

3..2

23

31

1

4

4

1

13

33

3

..0

01

14

4

Levene

Levene

S

Stta

attiis

sttiic

c

d

dff1

1

d

dff2

2

S

Siig

g..

ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty ..88448 8 4 4 ..22112 2 ..33660 0 ..883366 7 788..22227 7 11333 3 ..558888 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of  Sum of  S

(38)

More free assignment, please visit:

More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com

POST HOC TESTS

POST HOC TESTS

(39)

Multiple

Multiple ComComparisonsparisons Dependent

Dependent Variable: Customer_LoyaltyVariable: Customer_Loyalty Tukey HSD Tukey HSD --..221122550 0 ..115544227 7 ..33556 6 --..5577881 1 ..11553311 --..5566889955* * ..222288550 0 ..00337 7 --11..1111004 4 --..00227744 ..221122550 0 ..115544227 7 ..33556 6 --..1155331 1 ..55778811 --..335566445 5 ..225533557 7 ..33441 1 --..9955774 4 ..22444455 ..5566889955* * ..222288550 0 ..00337 7 ..0022774 4 11..11110044 ..335566445 5 ..225533557 7 ..33441 1 --..2244445 5 ..99557744 (J) Race (J) Race Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Malay Malay Indian Indian Malay Malay Chinese Chinese (I) Race (I) Race Malay Malay Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Mean Mean Difference Difference

((II--JJ) ) SSttdd. . EErrr or or r SSiigg. . LLoowweer r BBoouunnd d UUppppeer r BBoouunndd 95% Confidence Interval 95% Confidence Interval

The mean difference is significant at the

The mean difference is significant at the .05 level..05 level. *.

*.

Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty Tu

Tukey HSkey HSDDa,ba,b

9 95 5 33..77881111 3 31 1 33..9999335 5 33..99993355 1 12 2 44..33550000 ..55889 9 ..222299 Race Race Malay Malay Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Sig. Sig. N N 1 1 22

Subset for alpha = .05 Subset for alpha = .05

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

U

Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Sizses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 23e = 23.787.787.. a.

a.

The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the gro

of the gro up sizup sizes is used. Type I error levels arees is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.

not guaranteed. b.

References

Related documents

It is interesting to note that although today the Bauhaus is famous for its innovative architectural style and design ideas, architecture as a course was not added until 1927,

There are some ways you can purchase a measure of insurance to protect yourself from the uncertainties associated with reformulation outcomes: (1) bid high; (2) conduct lots

Research findings indicate that there is a relation between relationship marketing components including trust, commitment, communication quality, conflict handling

The construction of TMAs involves the use of a hollow device (punch), which is used to extract tissue fragments called “cores” from a single “donor” block, then these tissue cores

[r]

“I give credit to my father, he was a high school math teacher, and my mom told me that IMSA existed, I also had really great junior high math and science teachers, who just made

The study only showed significance across time in sodium and GGT, providing us information that these highly trained participants, SCT and CON, show individual differences in

The Optimal LR value is dependent on the base rate prob- abilities of stimulus being signal or noise, and also on the costs of incorrect and the benefits of correct detection and it