In short, this research found that trust, commitment, conflict handling, values and In short, this research found that trust, commitment, conflict handling, values and empathy ability of the bank determine the quality of the bank-customer relationship and empathy ability of the bank determine the quality of the bank-customer relationship and loyalty of their customers. When the bank behaves trustworthily, shows commitment, loyalty of their customers. When the bank behaves trustworthily, shows commitment, hand
handle le conconfliflicts cts welwell, l, tretreat at the the cuscustomtomers ers as as supsuppospose e thethey y shoshoulduld, , firfirm-cm-custustomeomer r relationship would be enhanced and at the same time the firm will gain more customers relationship would be enhanced and at the same time the firm will gain more customers loyalty towards their bank. However, trust drives customers’ loyalty more than the other loyalty towards their bank. However, trust drives customers’ loyalty more than the other dim
dimensensionions. s. ManManageagers rs and and marmarketketers ers of of banbankinking g serservicvices es in in parparticticulaular r and and serservicvicee organizations in general, should recognize the salience of these factors in their efforts to organizations in general, should recognize the salience of these factors in their efforts to build quality relationship with customers and to manage customer relationship more build quality relationship with customers and to manage customer relationship more
effectively. effectively.
Amine, A. (1998). Consumers’ true brand loyalty: the central role of commitment. Amine, A. (1998). Consumers’ true brand loyalty: the central role of commitment.
Journal of Strategic Marketing,
Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6 (4), pp. 305-19.6 (4), pp. 305-19.
Baldinger, A. and Rubinson, J. (1996). Brand-loyalty: the link between attitude and Baldinger, A. and Rubinson, J. (1996). Brand-loyalty: the link between attitude and
behavior.
behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 22-34.pp. 22-34.
Bang, H.
Bang, H. K., Raymond, M. A., taylor, C. R. Moon, YK., Raymond, M. A., taylor, C. R. Moon, Y. S. (2004). A comparison of service. S. (2004). A comparison of service quality dimensions conveyed in advertisements for service providers in the USA quality dimensions conveyed in advertisements for service providers in the USA and Korea,
and Korea, International Marketing International Marketing ReviewReview,, 22 (30), pp. 309-26.22 (30), pp. 309-26.
Referenc
Referenc
Baumann, C., Burton, S., Elliott, G. and Kehr, H. M. (2007). Prediction of attitude and Baumann, C., Burton, S., Elliott, G. and Kehr, H. M. (2007). Prediction of attitude and
behavior intentions in retail banking.
behavior intentions in retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing International Journal of Bank Marketing , 25, 25 (2), pp. 102-116.
(2), pp. 102-116.
Bearden, W
Bearden, W. O. and . O. and Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of Marketing Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of Marketing Scales: multi-itemScales: multi-item Measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. 2
Measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. 2ndnd ed. USA: Sageed. USA: Sage
Publications. Publications.
Beeli, A., Martin, J.D. and Quintan
Beeli, A., Martin, J.D. and Quintana, A. (2004). A a, A. (2004). A model of customer lomodel of customer loyalty in the retailyalty in the retail banking market.
banking market. European Journal of Marketing European Journal of Marketing , 38 (1/2), pp. 253-275., 38 (1/2), pp. 253-275.
Bend
Bendapudapudi, i, N., N., and and BerBerryry, , L. L. L. L. (19(1997)97). . CusCustomtomersers’ ’ motmotivaivatiotion n for for maimaintaintaininningg relationship with service providers.
relationship with service providers. Journal of Retailing, Journal of Retailing, 73 (1), pp. 15-37.73 (1), pp. 15-37.
Berry, L. (1996). On great service: a framework for actions.
Berry, L. (1996). On great service: a framework for actions. Journal of the academy of Journal of the academy of Marketing Science
Marketing Science, 24 (2), pp. 176., 24 (2), pp. 176.
Bhatty
Bhatty, , M., M., SkinkSkinkle, le, R., R., and Spalding, T. (2001). Redefining customer loyaltyand Spalding, T. (2001). Redefining customer loyalty, , thethe customer’s way
customer’s way. Journal of Ive. Journal of Ivey Business, 65 (3), pp.1y Business, 65 (3), pp.13-7.3-7.
Bitner, M. J. (1990) Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical Bitner, M. J. (1990) Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical
surroundings and employee responses.
surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 54 54 (2), (2), pp. pp. 69-82.69-82.
Bitner, M. J., Bernard, H. B.,
Bitner, M. J., Bernard, H. B., and Mary S. T. (1990). The serviceand Mary S. T. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents.
encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Journal of Marketing,
Marketing, 54 (1), pp. 71-94.54 (1), pp. 71-94.
Blankenship, A. B., Breen, G. E. and Dutka, A. (1998). State of the Art Marketing Blankenship, A. B., Breen, G. E. and Dutka, A. (1998). State of the Art Marketing
Research. 2
Research. 2ndnded. USA: NTC Business Books.ed. USA: NTC Business Books.
Boulding, W.,
Boulding, W., Ajay K., Ajay K., Richard S., Richard S., and Zeithaml, and Zeithaml, VV. A. (1993). A. A. (1993). A
dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions.
Bowen, J. T. and Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: a strategic commitment.
Bowen, J. T. and Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: a strategic commitment. The Cornell The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly
Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 44 (5), pp. 31-47., 44 (5), pp. 31-47.
Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: the effects of service quality and the mediating role Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: the effects of service quality and the mediating role
of customer satisfaction. Eur
of customer satisfaction. Eur opean Journal of Marketing opean Journal of Marketing , 36 (7-8), pp. 811-28., 36 (7-8), pp. 811-28.
Cava
Cavana, na, R. R. YY., ., DelDelahayahaye, e, B. B. D. D. & & SekSekaraaran, n, U. U. (20(2001)01). . AppApplielied d busbusineiness ss resresearearch:ch: qualitative and quantitative
qualitative and quantitative methods. Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons.methods. Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons.
Churchill, G. A. and Peter, P. (1984). Research design effects n the reliability of rating Churchill, G. A. and Peter, P. (1984). Research design effects n the reliability of rating
scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (4), pp.
scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (4), pp. 360-75.360-75.
Coakes, S. J. & Steed, L. (2007). SPSS version 14.0 for windows. Australia: John Wiley Coakes, S. J. & Steed, L. (2007). SPSS version 14.0 for windows. Australia: John Wiley
& Sons. & Sons.
Cronin, J.,
Cronin, J., BradyBrady, M. , M. and Hult, T. (2000). Assessing the effects of and Hult, T. (2000). Assessing the effects of qualityquality, value, , value, andand cu
custstomomer er sasatitisfsfacactition on on on coconsnsumumer er bebehahaviviororal al inintetentntioions ns in in seservrvicicee environments.
environments. Journal of Retailing Journal of Retailing , 76 (2), pp. 193-218., 76 (2), pp. 193-218. Cooper, D. R. &
Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, PSchindler, P. S. (2006). Business research . S. (2006). Business research methods 9methods 9ththed. McGraw Hill.ed. McGraw Hill.
Crosby
Crosby, L. A. & , L. A. & TTailor, J. R. (1983). ailor, J. R. (1983). Psychological commitment and Psychological commitment and itsits
effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters. effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters. Journal of Consumer Research,
Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (March), pp. 413-431.9 (March), pp. 413-431.
Curasi, C. and Kennedy, K. (2002). From prisoner to apostles: a typology of repeat Curasi, C. and Kennedy, K. (2002). From prisoner to apostles: a typology of repeat
buyers and loyal customers in service business.
buyers and loyal customers in service business. Journal of service Marketing, Journal of service Marketing, 1616 (4), pp. 322-41.
(4), pp. 322-41.
Day, G. S. (1969). A two-dimension concept of brand loyalty.
Day, G. S. (1969). A two-dimension concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Journal of Advertising Research,
De vaues, D.A. (2002). Surve
De vaues, D.A. (2002). Surveys in social research. Sydney: Alys in social research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.len & Unwin.
Disney, J. (1999). Customer satisfaction and loyalty: the critical elements of service Disney, J. (1999). Customer satisfaction and loyalty: the critical elements of service
quality.
quality. TTotal Quality otal Quality Management,Management, 10 (4-5), pp. 491-98.10 (4-5), pp. 491-98.
Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships.
Journal of Marketing
Journal of Marketing , 51 (2), pp. 11-27., 51 (2), pp. 11-27.
Egan, J. (2000). Drivers to relational strategies in retailing.
Egan, J. (2000). Drivers to relational strategies in retailing. International Journal of International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management,
Retail & Distribution Management, 28 (8), pp. 379-86.28 (8), pp. 379-86.
Evans, K.R. and Beltramini, R.F. (1987). A theoretical model of consumer negotiated Evans, K.R. and Beltramini, R.F. (1987). A theoretical model of consumer negotiated
pricing: an orientation perspective.
pricing: an orientation perspective. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 51, pp. 58-73.51, pp. 58-73. Fil
File, e, K. K. M. M. and and PrPrincince, e, R. A. R. A. (19(1993)93). . EvalEvaluatuating ing the the efeffecfectivtiveneseness s of of intinteraeractictiveve marketing.
marketing. Journal of Service Marketing Journal of Service Marketing , 7 (3), pp. 49-58., 7 (3), pp. 49-58.
Fornel
Fornell, C., Johnsl, C., Johnson, M. D., on, M. D., AndersAnderson, E. Won, E. W., ., Cha, J., Cha, J., and Bryanand Bryant, B. E. (1996)t, B. E. (1996)TT. he. he american customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings.
american customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Journal of Marketing,
Marketing, 60 (October), pp. 7-18.60 (October), pp. 7-18. Fos
Fosterter, , B., B., and and CadCadogaogan, n, J. J. (20(2000)00). . RelRelatiationsonship hip selsellinling g and and cuscustomtomer er loyloyaltyalty: : anan empirical investigation.
empirical investigation. Marketing Intelligence and Planning,Marketing Intelligence and Planning,18 (4), pp. 185-99.18 (4), pp. 185-99.
Fou
Founienierr, , S. S. (19(1998)98). . ConConsumsumer er and and thetheir ir brabrandsnds: : devedeveloploping ing relrelatiationsonship hip thetheory ory inin consumer research.
consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), pp. 343-374.24 (4), pp. 343-374.
Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., and Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., and Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers.
stayers. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 65 (3), pp. 65-87.65 (3), pp. 65-87.
Gremler, D. D., and
Gremler, D. D., and Stephen, WStephen, W. B. (1999). The . B. (1999). The loyalty ripple effect appreciating the fullloyalty ripple effect appreciating the full value of customers.
value of customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1010 (3), pp. 271-91.
Gutman, J.
Gutman, J. (1982)(1982). A means-end chain . A means-end chain model based model based on on consumeconsumer r categorcategories processesies processes.. Journal of Marketing,
Journal of Marketing, 46 (Spring), pp. 60-72.46 (Spring), pp. 60-72.
Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of linkages between consequences and values. Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of linkages between consequences and values.
Journal of Business Research,
Journal of Business Research, 22 (March), pp. 60-72.22 (March), pp. 60-72.
Heskett, J. L. (2002). Beyond customer loyalty.
Heskett, J. L. (2002). Beyond customer loyalty. ManagiManaging ng Service QualityService Quality,12 (6), pp.,12 (6), pp. 355-7.
355-7.
Heskett, J., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., and Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the Heskett, J., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., and Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the
service-profit chain to work.
service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Harvard Business ReviewReview,, 72 (2), pp. 164-174.72 (2), pp. 164-174.
Hofmeyr, J. and Rice, B.
Hofmeyr, J. and Rice, B. (2000). Commitment-led marketing. UK: John (2000). Commitment-led marketing. UK: John Wiley & Sons.Wiley & Sons.
Huber, F., Herrmann, A. and Morgan, R. E. (2001). Gaining competitive advantage Huber, F., Herrmann, A. and Morgan, R. E. (2001). Gaining competitive advantage
through customer value oriented management.
through customer value oriented management. The Journal Marketing The Journal Marketing , 18 (1), pp., 18 (1), pp. 41-53.
41-53.
Huseyin, A., Salih, T. K., and Salime, M. S. (2005). A comparison of service quality in Huseyin, A., Salih, T. K., and Salime, M. S. (2005). A comparison of service quality in
the banking industry.
the banking industry. Intern International Journal of ational Journal of Bank Bank MarketMarketing,ing, 23 (7), pp. 508-23 (7), pp. 508-26.
26.
Jacob, J. (1971). A model of multi-brand loyalty.
Jacob, J. (1971). A model of multi-brand loyalty. Journa Journal l of of AdvertiAdvertising sing ResearResearchch, , 1111 (3), pp. 25-31.
(3), pp. 25-31.
Jacoby, J., and Chestnut, R. W. (1978).Brand loyalty measurement and management. Jacoby, J., and Chestnut, R. W. (1978).Brand loyalty measurement and management.
New York: John Wiley & Son. New York: John Wiley & Son.
Keating, B., Rugimbana, R., and Quazi, A. (2003). Differentiating between service Keating, B., Rugimbana, R., and Quazi, A. (2003). Differentiating between service
quality and relationship quality in cyberspace.
quality and relationship quality in cyberspace. Managing Service Quality,Managing Service Quality, 13 (3),13 (3), pp. 217-32.
Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory
study.
study. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 59 (71-82).59 (71-82).
Jacoby, J. & Kyner, D. B. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior.
Jacoby, J. & Kyner, D. B. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior. Journal Journal of Marketing Research, Chicago
of Marketing Research, Chicago, 10 (1), pp. 1-10., 10 (1), pp. 1-10.
Jones, T. O. and Sasser, W
Jones, T. O. and Sasser, W. E. . E. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect.(1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Harvard Business Review,
Review, 73 (6), pp. 88-99.73 (6), pp. 88-99.
Kandampully, J. (1998). Service quality to service loyalty: a relationship which goes Kandampully, J. (1998). Service quality to service loyalty: a relationship which goes
beyond customer services
beyond customer services. Total Quality Management . Total Quality Management , 9 (6), pp. 431-43., 9 (6), pp. 431-43.
Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory Keaveney, S. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory
study.
study. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 59, pp. 71-82.59, pp. 71-82.
Kettinger, W. J. and Lee. C.C. (1995). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction Kettinger, W. J. and Lee. C.C. (1995). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction
with the information services function.
with the information services function. Decision Sciences, Decision Sciences, 25 (5), pp. 737-66.25 (5), pp. 737-66.
Knox, S., and Walker, D. (2001). Measuring and managing brand loyalty.
Knox, S., and Walker, D. (2001). Measuring and managing brand loyalty. Journal of Journal of Strategic Marketing,
Strategic Marketing, 9 (2), pp. 9 (2), pp. 11111-28.1-28.
Kunyk, D. & Olson, J.K. (2001). Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy.
Kunyk, D. & Olson, J.K. (2001). Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy. Journal Journal of Advanced Nursing
of Advanced Nursing , 35 (3), pp. 317-25., 35 (3), pp. 317-25.
Leowenthal, K.M. (1996). An introduction to psychological test ans scales. 141. Leowenthal, K.M. (1996). An introduction to psychological test ans scales. 141.
Malhotra, N.K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. and Crisp, M. (1996). Marketing research: an applied Malhotra, N.K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. and Crisp, M. (1996). Marketing research: an applied
orientation. Sydney
orientation. Sydney NSWNSW, Australi: Prentice , Australi: Prentice Hall.Hall.
Mil
Miles, es, M.BM.B. . and and HubHubermerman, A.M. an, A.M. 91991994)94). . QuaQualitlitatiative ve datdata a analanalysiysis: s: an an expexpandeandedd sourcebook. 2
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationship between providers Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationship between providers
an
and d ususerers s of of mamarkrket et rereseseararch: ch: ththe e dydynamnamicics s of of trtrusust t wiwiththin in anand d betbetweweenen organizations.
organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing Research,29 (3), pp.314-28.29 (3), pp.314-28.
Morgan, R. and Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Morgan, R. and Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing.
Journal of Marketing,
Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), pp. 20-38.58 (3), pp. 20-38.
Morris, D. S., Barnes, B. R., and Lynch, J. E. (1999). Relationship marketing needs total Morris, D. S., Barnes, B. R., and Lynch, J. E. (1999). Relationship marketing needs total
quality Management.
quality Management. TTotal Quality otal Quality Management,Management, 10 (4-5), pp. 659.10 (4-5), pp. 659.
Naceur, J. and Azaddin, K. (2005). A customized measure of service quality in the UAE. Naceur, J. and Azaddin, K. (2005). A customized measure of service quality in the UAE.
Managing Service
Managing Service QualityQuality,, 15 (4), pp. 374-88.15 (4), pp. 374-88.
Naresh, K., M. (1986). Consumer behavior and marketing actions.
Naresh, K., M. (1986). Consumer behavior and marketing actions. Journal of Marketing Journal of Marketing Science,
Science, 11 (1), pp. 191-93.11 (1), pp. 191-93.
Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Understanding the salience of cultural dimensions on relationship Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Understanding the salience of cultural dimensions on relationship
marketing, it’s underpinnings and aftermaths.
marketing, it’s underpinnings and aftermaths. Cross Cultural Management,Cross Cultural Management, 1111 (3).
(3).
Ndu
Ndubisbisi, i, N. N. O. O. (20(2007)07). . RelRelatiationsonship hip marmarketketing ing and and cuscustomtomer er loyloyaltyalty.. Marketing Marketing Intelligence & Planning,
Intelligence & Planning, 25 (1), pp. 98-106.25 (1), pp. 98-106.
Ndu
Ndubisbisi, N. i, N. O. and O. and WWah, C.K. ah, C.K. (20(2005)05). . FacFactortorial and ial and disdiscricriminminant analyant analyses of ses of thethe underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction.
underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction. International International Journal of Bank Marketing,
Journal of Bank Marketing, 23 (7), pp. 542-557.23 (7), pp. 542-557.
Neuman, W
Neuman, W. L. (2003). . L. (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches.quantitative approaches. 5
5ththed. Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.ed. Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.
Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases
Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response.of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research,
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty?.consumer loyalty?. Journal of Merketing, Journal of Merketing, 63, pp.33-44.63, pp.33-44.
Ols
Olsen, en, S. S. (20(2002)02). . ComComparparatiative ve evalevaluatuation ion and and the the relrelatiationsonship hip betbetweeween n qualqualityity,, satisfaction and
satisfaction and repurchase loyaltyrepurchase loyalty.. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 30 (3), pp. 240-9.
(3), pp. 240-9.
Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer
Value.
Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), pp. 154-61., 25 (2), pp. 154-61.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and . A. and BerryBerry, L. , L. L. (1985). A conceptual model L. (1985). A conceptual model of serviceof service quality and its implications for future research.
quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), pp.49 (4), pp. 41-50.
41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item
scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.
scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing Journal of Retailing ,, 64, pp. 12-40.
64, pp. 12-40.
Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the
quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda.
loyalty chain: a research agenda. Journa Journal l of the of the Academy of Academy of MarketMarketing Scienceing Science,, 28 (1), pp. 168-74.
28 (1), pp. 168-74.
Park, C.,
Park, C., and and Kim, YKim, Y. . (2003)(2003). . IdentIdentifyiifying ng key key factofactors rs affeaffecting consumer purchasecting consumer purchase be
behavihavior or in in an an onlonline ine shoshoppipping ng contcontextext.. In Interternatinational onal JouJournal rnal of of RetRetail ail && Distribution Management,
Distribution Management, 31 (1), pp. 69-29.31 (1), pp. 69-29.
Pre
Pressesseyy, , A. A. D., D., and and MatMathewhews, s, B. B. PP. . (20(2000)00). . BarBarrieriers rs to to relrelatiationsonship hip marmarketketing ing inin consumer retailing.
consumer retailing. Journal of Services Marketing, Journal of Services Marketing, 14 (3), pp. 272-86.14 (3), pp. 272-86.
Pritchard, M., Havitz, M. and Howard, D. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty Pritchard, M., Havitz, M. and Howard, D. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty
link in service contexts.
link in service contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (3), pp., 27 (3), pp. 333-48.
Pruitt, D.G. (1981).
Pruitt, D.G. (1981). Negotiation Behaviour. New YNegotiation Behaviour. New York:Academic Press Inc.ork:Academic Press Inc.
Ranchhod, A. and Zhou, F. (2001). Comparing respondents of e-mail and mail surveys: Ranchhod, A. and Zhou, F. (2001). Comparing respondents of e-mail and mail surveys:
understanding the
understanding the implications of technologimplications of technologyy.. Marketing Intelligence and Marketing Intelligence and Planning
Planning , 19 (4), pp. 254-62., 19 (4), pp. 254-62.
Raymond, M.A. and Rylance, W. (1995). Evaluation and management of professional Raymond, M.A. and Rylance, W. (1995). Evaluation and management of professional
services in Korea.
services in Korea. Advances in International Marketing, Advances in International Marketing, 7, pp. 7, pp. 11111-15.1-15.
Reichheld, F. and Aspinall, K. (1993). Building high-loyalty business systems.
Reichheld, F. and Aspinall, K. (1993). Building high-loyalty business systems. Journal Journal of Retail Banking,
of Retail Banking, 15 (4), pp. 21-9.15 (4), pp. 21-9.
Reichheld, F. (1996). Learning from customer defections.
Reichheld, F. (1996). Learning from customer defections. Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business Review, 7474 (2), pp. 56-69.
(2), pp. 56-69.
Reichheld, F. F., and Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero defections: quality comes to services. Reichheld, F. F., and Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero defections: quality comes to services.
Harvard Business
Harvard Business ReviewReview,, 68 (5), pp. 105-11.68 (5), pp. 105-11.
Reichheld, F. F.(2003). The one number you need to grow.
Reichheld, F. F.(2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review Harvard Business Review, 81, 81 (12), pp. 46-54.
(12), pp. 46-54.
Reichheld, F. and Schefter, P
Reichheld, F. and Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty: your secret . (2000). E-loyalty: your secret weapon on weapon on the web.the web. Harvard Harvard Business Review
Business Review, 78 (4), pp. 105-13., 78 (4), pp. 105-13.
Tyan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In Tyan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In handbook of qualitative research, USA” Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. handbook of qualitative research, USA” Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. Sage Publications.
Sage Publications.
Sekaran, U. (2004). Research method for business: a skill building approach. New York: Sekaran, U. (2004). Research method for business: a skill building approach. New York:
John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons.
Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and consequence of trust and satisfaction in buyer-seller Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and consequence of trust and satisfaction in buyer-seller
relationship.
relationship. European Journal of Marketing European Journal of Marketing , 32 (3), pp. 305-22., 32 (3), pp. 305-22.
Shanker, V,. Smith, A., and Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty Shanker, V,. Smith, A., and Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty
in
in onlonline ine and and ofofflifline ne envenviroironmenmentsnts.. In Interternatnationional al JouJournal rnal of of ResResearearch ch inin Marketing,
Marketing, 20 (2), pp. 153-75.20 (2), pp. 153-75.
Sirdeshmukh, D. S.,
Sirdeshmukh, D. S., J. and J. and Sabol, B. (2002). Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value,Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges.
and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 66 (15-37).66 (15-37).
Slater, S. (1997). Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm.
Slater, S. (1997). Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm. Journal of the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), pp. 162-7., 25 (2), pp. 162-7.
Srinivasan, S., Anderson, R., and Ponnavolu (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an Srinivasan, S., Anderson, R., and Ponnavolu (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an
exploration of its antecedents and consequences.
exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, Journal of Retailing, 78 (1), pp.78 (1), pp. 41-50.
41-50.
Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T. and Gronross, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T. and Gronross, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships
for profit: the dynamics of relationship quality.
for profit: the dynamics of relationship quality. International Journal of Service International Journal of Service Industry Management,
Industry Management, 5 (5), pp. 21-38.5 (5), pp. 21-38.
Tepeci, M. (1999). Increasing Brand Loyalty in the Hospitality Industry.
Tepeci, M. (1999). Increasing Brand Loyalty in the Hospitality Industry. International International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11 (5), pp. 223-9.11 (5), pp. 223-9.
V
Vandermerwe, S. (2003). andermerwe, S. (2003). Customer-minded growth through Customer-minded growth through services.services. Managing ServiceManaging Service Quality
Quality, 13 (4), pp. 262-6., 13 (4), pp. 262-6.
White, S. and Schneider, B. (2000). Climbing the commitment ladder: the role of White, S. and Schneider, B. (2000). Climbing the commitment ladder: the role of
expectations disconfirmation on consumers’ behavioral intentions.
expectations disconfirmation on consumers’ behavioral intentions. Journal of Journal of Service Research,
Service Research, 2 (3), pp. 240-53.2 (3), pp. 240-53.
Wilkie, W
Wong, A. and Sohal, A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between trust, Wong, A. and Sohal, A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between trust,
commi
commitment tment and and relatrelationshiionship p qualitqualityy.. Int Internaernatiotional nal JourJournal nal of of RetRetail ail and and Distribution Management,
Distribution Management, 30 (1), pp. 34-50.30 (1), pp. 34-50.
W
Wong, A., and Sohal, A. (2003). ong, A., and Sohal, A. (2003). Service quality and customer Service quality and customer loyalty perspective on twoloyalty perspective on two levels of retail relationship.
levels of retail relationship. Journal of Service Marketing, Journal of Service Marketing, 17 (5), pp. 495-513.17 (5), pp. 495-513.
V
Vavra, Tavra, T. G. (1992). After marketing: ho. G. (1992). After marketing: how to keep w to keep customers for life through customers for life through relationshiprelationship marketing. Homewood: Business One Irwin.
marketing. Homewood: Business One Irwin.
Zeithaml, V
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry. A., Berry, L. , L. L., and L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behParasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioralavioral consequences of
consequences of service qualityservice quality.. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 60 (April), pp. 31-46.60 (April), pp. 31-46.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation process differ between goods and Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation process differ between goods and
servi
services. ces. In In ServiServices ces marketmarketing ing ProcProceedingseedings. . ChicagChicago: American o: American MarkeMarketingting Association.
Association.
Zeit
Zeithamhaml, l, VV. . A. A. (20(2000)00). . SerServicvice e qualqualityity, , proprofitfitabiabilitlityy, , and and the the ecoeconominomic c worworth th of of customers: what we know and what we need to learn.
customers: what we know and what we need to learn. Journal of the Academy of Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Marketing Science, 28 (1), pp. 67-85.28 (1), pp. 67-85.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences
of service quality.
of service quality. Journal of Marketing Journal of Marketing , 60, pp. 31-46., 60, pp. 31-46.
Zikmund, W. (2000).
Zikmund, W. (2000). Business Research Methods Business Research Methods, 6th edn, The Dryden Press, Harcourt, 6th edn, The Dryden Press, Harcourt College Publishers.
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
PART 1 PART 1
DEMOGRAPHIC. ( Choose the suitable answer and tick
DEMOGRAPHIC. ( Choose the suitable answer and tick
in the box given for eachin the box given for each question. question. 1 1.. GGeennddeer r Male Female Male Female 2 2.. AAggee BelowBelow 20 20 years years 20 20 – – 39 39 yearsyears
40
40 – – 59 59 years years 60 years 60 years and and aboveabove
3
3.. RRaaccee
Malay Chinese
Malay Chinese
IInnddiiaann OOtthheerrss
4
4.. RReelliiggiioonn
H
Hiinndduu OOtthheerrss
5.
5. HigHigheshest edut educatcationional qal qualualifiificatcationion
Primary Secondary
Primary Secondary
H
HSSCC//DDiipplloomma a DDeeggrreeee
Postgraduate Others
Postgraduate Others
6
6.. OOccccuuppatatiioonn
Government
Government Sector Sector Private Private Sector Sector
Own
Own Business Business StudentStudent
Others Others
7.
7. MMonontthlhly Iy Incncomomee
Be
Belolow w RM RM 202000 00 RM RM 202000 00 – – RM RM 39399999
R
PART 11 PART 11
Choose the statement which u thinks accurate and circle the score provided for each Choose the statement which u thinks accurate and circle the score provided for each question given. question given. Strongly Strongly Disagree Disagree D
Diissaaggrreeee NNo o OOppiinniioonn AAggrreeee SSttrroonnggllyy Agree Agree
1 2 3
1 2 3 44 55
1.
1. The bank is The bank is very concern wvery concern with securityith security
ffoor r mmy y ttrraannssaaccttiioonns s 11 22 33 44 55 2
2. . TThhe e bbaannkk’’s s pprroommiissees s aarre e rreelliiaabblle e 11 22 33 44 55 3.
3. The bank is The bank is consistent in consistent in providing qualityproviding quality
sseerrvviiccee 11 22 33 44 55
4. Employee of the bank show respect to 4. Employee of the bank show respect to
ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55
5
5. . TThhe e bbaannk k ffuullffiilllls s iitts s oobblliiggaattiioon n tto o ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55 6
6. . I I hhaavve e ccoonnffiiddeenncce e iin n tthhe e bbaannkk’’s s sseerrvviicceess 11 22 33 44 55 7
7. . TThhe e bbaannk k mmaakkees s aaddjjuussttmmeennt t tto o ssuuiit t mmy y nneeeeddss 11 22 33 44 55 8. The bank offers personalized services to meet
8. The bank offers personalized services to meet
ccuussttoommeerr’’ss nneeeedd 11 22 33 44 55 9. The bank is flexible when its services are
9. The bank is flexible when its services are
cchhaannggeedd 11 22 33 44 55
1
100. . TThhe e bbaannk k iis s fflleexxiibblle e iin n sseerrvviinng g mmy y nneeeeddss 11 22 33 44 55 11.
11. Services of the bank are in line with ourServices of the bank are in line with our social values
12. Services of the bank are consistent with 12. Services of the bank are consistent with
m
myy ppeerrssoonnaall vvaalluueess 11 22 33 44 55 13. Services of the bank are consistent with
13. Services of the bank are consistent with m
myy lliiffeeggooaallss 11 22 33 44 55
1
144. . MMy y bbaannk k vvaalluue e mme e aas s a a ccuussttoommeerr 11 22 33 44 55 15. Service of this bank contributed to the
15. Service of this bank contributed to the w
weellffaarre e oof f tthhe e ssoocciieettyy 11 22 33 44 55 16. Employees of the bank deal with customer’s
16. Employees of the bank deal with customer’s
iinnaa ccaarriinngg ffaasshhiioonn 11 22 33 44 55 17. Bank employee’s give the individualized
17. Bank employee’s give the individualized
aatttteennttiioon n tto o ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55
18. The employees of the bank understand your 18. The employees of the bank understand your
ssppeecciiffiicc nneeeeddss 11 22 33 44 55 19. Bank employees have
19. Bank employees have the customer’s bestthe customer’s best
iinntteerreesstt aatt hheeaarrtt 11 22 33 44 55 20. Bank has operating hours convenient to all its
20. Bank has operating hours convenient to all its
ccuussttoommeerrss 11 22 33 44 55
2
211. . TThhe e bbaannk k ttrriiees s tto o aavvooiid d ppootteennttiiaal l ccoonnfflliicctt 11 22 33 44 55 22. The bank tries to solve manifest conflicts
22. The bank tries to solve manifest conflicts b
beeffoorre e tthheey y ccrreeaatte e pprroobblleemmss 11 22 33 44 55 23. The bank has the
23. The bank has the ability to openly discussability to openly discuss
ssoolluuttiioonns s wwhheen n pprroobblleem m aarriissee 11 22 33 44 55 2
244. . TThhe e bbaannk k iis s rreessppoonnssiivve e tto o mmy y ccoommppllaaiinnttss 11 22 33 44 55 25. The service provider shows a sincere
25. The service provider shows a sincere interestinterest
iin n ssoollvviinng g ccuussttoommeer r pprroobblleemm 11 22 33 44 55 26. Considering the bank as first choice among
26. Considering the bank as first choice among other banks in the area; and the bank that first other banks in the area; and the bank that first comes to my mind when making purchases comes to my mind when making purchases d
deecciissiioon n oon n bbaannk k sseerrvviicceess.. 11 22 33 44 55 27. If I had to do it over again, I would still
27. If I had to do it over again, I would still
28. I do not like to change to another bank 28. I do not like to change to another bank
b
beeccaauusse e I I vvaalluue e tthhe e sseelleecctteed d bbaannk k 11 22 33 44 55 2
299. . I I aam m a a ccuussttoommeer r llooyyaalltty y tto o mmy y bbaannkk 11 22 33 44 55 30. I would always recommend my bank to
30. I would always recommend my bank to
ssoommeeoonne e wwhho o sseeeekks s my my aaddvviiccee 11 22 33 44 55
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX B
RELIABILITY
RELIABILITY
Customer's Loyalty
Customer's Loyalty
Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics ..99001 1 ..99001 1 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's AlAlpha pha BasedBased on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N N oof f IItteemmss Ite
Item-Tm-Total Statisticsotal Statistics
1 155..550 0 1100..11335 5 ..77330 0 ..888855 1 155..557 7 99..22883 3 ..77665 5 ..887766 1 155..550 0 88..99223 3 ..88003 3 ..886688 1 155..444 4 88..66886 6 ..88006 6 ..886688 1 155..555 5 1100..22993 3 ..66777 7 ..889955 Customer's Loyalty 26 Customer's Loyalty 26 Customer's Loyalty 27 Customer's Loyalty 27 Customer's Loyalty 28 Customer's Loyalty 28 Customer's Loyalty 29 Customer's Loyalty 29 Customer's Loyalty 30 Customer's Loyalty 30
Scale Mean if Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if Variance if Item Deleted Item Deleted Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted
Trust Dimension
Trust Dimension
Re
Reliability Sliability Statisticstatistics
..88556 6 ..88559 9 66 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N oN of f IItteemmss Ite
Item-Tm-Total Statisticsotal Statistics
1 199..229 9 99..77226 6 ..66996 6 ..882222 1 199..445 5 99..99113 3 ..66888 8 ..882244 1 199..555 5 99..66551 1 ..66660 0 ..882288 1 199..552 2 1100..00118 8 ..55001 1 ..886622 1 199..336 6 99..88668 8 ..66775 5 ..882266 1 199..338 8 99..88330 0 ..66669 9 ..882277 Trust 1 Trust 1 Trust 2 Trust 2 Trust 3 Trust 3 Trust 4 Trust 4 Trust 5 Trust 5 Trust 6 Trust 6
Scale Mean if Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if Variance if Item Deleted Item Deleted Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Alpha if IItemtem
Deleted Deleted
Commitment Dimension
Commitment Dimension
Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics ..88558 8 ..88558 8 44 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N N oof f IItteemmssItem-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 111..112 2 55..99228 8 ..66003 3 ..885588 1 111..002 2 55..11775 5 ..77446 6 ..880000 1 111..009 9 55..44773 3 ..77330 0 ..880077 1 111..112 2 55..66007 7 ..77335 5 ..880066 Commitment 7 Commitment 7 Commitment 8 Commitment 8 Commitment 9 Commitment 9 Comm Commitment 1itment 1 00
Scale Mean if Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if Variance if IItem Deletetem Delete dd
Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted
Conflict Handling Dimension
Conflict Handling Dimension
Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics ..88669 9 ..88669 9 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N N oof f IItteemmss Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 155..449 9 88..33883 3 ..77551 1 ..882266 1 155..338 8 88..22007 7 ..77887 7 ..881177 1 155..441 1 88..55222 2 ..77113 3 ..883366 1 155..440 0 88..99771 1 ..55880 0 ..887700 1 155..449 9 99..33003 3 ..66442 2 ..885533 Conflict Handling 11 Conflict Handling 11 Conflict Handling 12 Conflict Handling 12 Conflict Handling 13 Conflict Handling 13 Conflict Handling 14 Conflict Handling 14 Conflict Handling 15 Conflict Handling 15
Scale Mean if Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if Variance if Item Deleted Item Deleted Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted
V
Values
alues Dimension
Dimension
Re
Reliability Sliability Statisticstatistics
..88336 6 ..88338 8 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N oN of f IItteemmss Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 144..002 2 88..77222 2 ..66114 4 ..881100 1 133..999 9 88..44445 5 ..66665 5 ..779966 1 144..224 4 88..44331 1 ..66999 9 ..778866 1 144..334 4 88..55447 7 ..77229 9 ..778800 1 144..225 5 99..22338 8 ..44997 7 ..884422 Values 16 Values 16 Values 17 Values 17 Values 18 Values 18 Values 19 Values 19 Values 20 Values 20
Scale Mean if Scale Mean if IItem Deletetem Delete dd
Scale Scale Variance if Variance if IItem Deletetem Delete dd
Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted
Empathy Dimension
Empathy Dimension
ReReliability Sliability Statisticstatistics
..88555 5 ..88556 6 55 Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Alpha Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha Based Alpha Based on on Standardized Standardized IItteemms s N oN of f IItteemmss
Item-Total Statistics Item-Total Statistics 1 155..338 8 88..11449 9 ..55773 3 ..884488 1 155..335 5 88..00997 7 ..66444 4 ..883333 1 155..339 9 77..22776 6 ..77444 4 ..880055 1 155..333 3 77..22331 1 ..66774 4 ..882255 1 155..330 0 77..00331 1 ..77220 0 ..881111 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 11 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 22 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 33 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 44 Em Empathy 2pathy 2 55
Scale Mean if Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item Deleted Scale Scale Variance if Variance if IItem Deletetem Delete dd
Corrected Corrected Item-Total Item-Total Correlation Correlation Cronbach's Cronbach's Alpha if Item Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted
CORRELATIONS
CORRELATIONS
Correlations Correlations
1
1
..666633*** *
..558888*** *
..558855*** *
..772200*** *
..772200****
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..000000
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
113388
..666633*** *
1
1
..667711*** *
..662211*** *
..666611*** *
..667744****
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..000000
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
113388
..558888*** *
..667711*** *
1
1
..666655*** *
..663311*** *
..668811****
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..000000
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
113388
..558855*** *
..662211*** *
..666655*** *
1
1
..772299*** *
..668899****
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..000000
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
113388
..772200*** *
..666611*** *
..663311*** *
..772299*** *
1
1
..774444****
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..000000
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
113388
..772200*** *
..667744*** *
..668811*** *
..668899*** *
..774444*** *
11
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..00000
0
..000000
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
11338
8
113388
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sig. (2-tailed)
NN
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sig. (2-tailed)
NN
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sig. (2-tailed)
NN
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sig. (2-tailed)
NN
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sig. (2-tailed)
NN
Pearson Correlation
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sig. (2-tailed)
NN
Trust
Trust
Commitment
Commitment
Conflict Handling
Conflict Handling
Values
Values
Empathy
Empathy
Customer Loyalty
Customer Loyalty
TrTrus
ust t Co
Commmmititmmen
entt
Conflict_
Conflict_
HHan
andldliing
ng
VValaluues
es EEmmppatathhyy
Customer_
Customer_
Loyalty
Loyalty
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
**.**.
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
REGRESSION
REGRESSION
Model Summary Model Summarybb .829 .829aa ..66887 7 ..66775 5 ..443333118 8 11..777722 Model Model 1 1 R R R R SSqquuaarree Adjusted Adjusted R Square R Square Std. Error of Std. Error of the Estimate the Estimate Durbin-Watson Watson Predictors: (Constant), Empathy, Conflict_Handling, Commitment, Trust, Predictors: (Constant), Empathy, Conflict_Handling, Commitment, Trust, Values
Values a.
a.
Dependent
Dependent Variable: CustomVariable: Customer_Loyaltyer_Loyalty b. b. ANOVA ANOVAbb 5 544..33006 6 5 5 1100..88661 1 5577..88882 2 ..000000aa 2 244..77669 9 11332 2 ..118888 7 799..00775 5 113377 Regression Regression Residual Residual Total Total Model Model 1 1 Sum of Sum of S
Sqquuaarrees s ddf f MMeeaan n SSqquuaarre e FF Sig.Sig.
Predictors: (Constan
Predictors: (Constan t), Empathy, Conflict_Ht), Empathy, Conflict_Handling, andling, CommCommitment, Trust, itment, Trust, ValuesValues a.
a.
Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty b. b. Coefficients Coefficientsaa --..22112 2 ..22550 0 --..88449 9 ..339977 ..33227 7 ..00993 3 ..22666 6 33..55115 5 ..00001 1 ..44115 5 22..441111 ..11008 8 ..00775 5 ..11009 9 11..44333 3 ..11554 4 ..44113 3 22..442233 ..11999 9 ..00777 7 ..11990 0 22..55772 2 ..00111 1 ..44336 6 22..229955 ..11772 2 ..00882 2 ..11663 3 22..11001 1 ..00338 8 ..33993 3 22..554466 ..22773 3 ..00996 6 ..22443 3 22..88334 4 ..00005 5 ..33224 4 33..008877 (Constant) (Constant) Trust Trust Commitment Commitment Conflict_Handling Conflict_Handling Values Values Empathy Empathy Model Model 1 1 B B SSttdd. . EErrrroor r Unstandardized Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients Beta Beta Standardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients t
t SSiigg. . TToolleerraanncce e VVIIFF Collinearity Statistics Collinearity Statistics
Dependent
Dependent Variable: Customer_LoyaltyVariable: Customer_Loyalty a. a. Collinearity Diagnostics Collinearity Diagnosticsaa 5 5..99332 2 11..00000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..000 0 ..0000 ..00223 3 1166..00669 9 ..663 3 ..001 1 ..110 0 ..002 2 ..009 9 ..0000 ..00116 6 1199..22778 8 ..000 0 ..002 2 ..550 0 ..000 0 ..444 4 ..0022 ..00113 3 2211..33115 5 ..005 5 ..113 3 ..001 1 ..668 8 ..000 0 ..1144 ..00110 0 2244..88112 2 ..228 8 ..223 3 ..338 8 ..229 9 ..226 6 ..1100 ..00007 7 3300..00660 0 ..003 3 ..661 1 ..001 1 ..000 0 ..221 1 ..7733 Dimension Dimension 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Model Model 1 1 Eigenvalue Eigenvalue Condition Condition IIn dn de x e x ( C( Co no nsst at annt ) t ) T rT ruus t s t C oC ommmmiittmme ne ntt Conflict_ Conflict_ H Ha na nd ld liin g n g VVa la luue s e s EEmmp ap atth yh y Variance Proportions Variance Proportions
Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty Dependent Variable: Customer_Loyalty a.
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
NORMALITY
NORMALITY
Case Proce
Case Proce ssing Summassing Summaryry
1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% 1 1338 8 110000..00% % 0 0 ..00% % 11338 8 110000..00%% Trust Trust Commitment Commitment Conflict_Handling Conflict_Handling Values Values Empathy Empathy Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty N
N PPeerrcceennt t N N PPeerrcceennt t N N PPeerrcceenntt V
Vaalliid d MMiissssiinng g TToottaall Cases
Cases
Descriptives Descriptives
S
Sttaattiissttiicc SSttdd. . EErrrroor r Trust
Trust MeanMean 33..88885533 ..0055226633 95% Confidence
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.78123.7812 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.9893 3.9893 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.92273.9227 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .382.382 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .61832.61832 Minimum Minimum 2.002.00 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.003.00 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range .58.58 Skewness Skewness --11..001122 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis 11..332211 ..441100 Commitment
Commitment MeanMean 33..66995577 ..0066552299 95% Confidence
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.56653.5665 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.8248 3.8248 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.71543.7154 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .588.588 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .76698.76698 Minimum Minimum 1.501.50 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.503.50 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.061.06 Skewness Skewness --..338833 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..444466 ..441100
Conflict_Handling
Conflict_Handling MeanMean 33..88558800 ..0066116688 95% Confidence
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.73603.7360 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.9799 3.9799 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.88823.8882 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .525.525 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .72463.72463 Minimum Minimum 2.002.00 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.003.00 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..558844 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..330055 ..441100 Values
Values MeanMean 33..55442200 ..0066114444 95% Confidence
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.42053.4205 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.6635 3.6635 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.56753.5675 Median Median 3.60003.6000 Variance Variance .521.521 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .72180.72180 Minimum Minimum 1.601.60 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.403.40 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..552211 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..112266 ..441100 Empathy
Empathy MeanMean 33..88337777 ..0055774477 95% Confidence
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.72403.7240 Upper Bound Upper Bound 3.9513 3.9513 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.87073.8707 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .456.456 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .67513.67513 Minimum Minimum 1.801.80 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.203.20 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..668833 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis ..115599 ..441100
Customer_Loyalty
Customer_Loyalty MeanMean 33..88778833 ..0066446677 95% Confidence
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Lower Bound 3.75043.7504 Upper Bound Upper Bound 4.0061 4.0061 5% Trimmed Mean 5% Trimmed Mean 3.91423.9142 Median Median 4.00004.0000 Variance Variance .577.577 Std. Deviation Std. Deviation .75973.75973 Minimum Minimum 1.601.60 Maximum Maximum 5.005.00 Range Range 3.403.40 Interquartile Range Interquartile Range 1.001.00 Skewness Skewness --..770011 ..220066 Kurtosis Kurtosis --..004455 ..441100 Tests of Normality Tests of Normality ..11990 0 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99220 0 11338 8 ..000000 ..11661 1 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99664 4 11338 8 ..000011 ..11665 5 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99551 1 11338 8 ..000000 ..11443 3 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99663 3 11338 8 ..000011 ..11444 4 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99554 4 11338 8 ..000000 ..11558 8 11338 8 ..00000 0 ..99443 3 11338 8 ..000000 Trust Trust Commitment Commitment Conflict_Handling Conflict_Handling Values Values Empathy Empathy Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty S
Sttaattiissttiic c ddf f SSiigg. . SSttaattiissttiic c ddf f SSiigg.. Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Kolmogorov-Smirnovaa Shapiro-WilkShapiro-Wilk
Lilliefors Significance Correction Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
ONE WAY
ONE WAY
Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 995 5 33..7788111 1 ..772255886 6 ..007744447 7 33..6633332 2 33..9922889 9 11..660 0 44..8800 331 1 33..9999335 5 ..887755557 7 ..115577226 6 33..6677224 4 44..3311447 7 22..220 0 55..0000 112 2 44..3355000 0 ..448833336 6 ..113399553 3 44..0044229 9 44..6655771 1 33..660 0 55..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Malay Malay Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Total Total N
N MMeaean n SStdtd. . DeDevviiatatiion on SStdtd. . EErrrror or LoLowwer er BBouound nd UUpppper er BBououndnd 95% Confidence Interval for 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Mean
Mi
Minimnimum um MaxMaximimumum
Test of Homogeneity of Variances Test of Homogeneity of Variances Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 2 2..99558 8 2 2 11335 5 ..005555 Levene Levene S
Sttaattiissttiic c ddff1 1 ddff2 2 SSiigg..
ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 3 3..99880 0 2 2 11..99990 0 33..55778 8 ..003311 7 755..00995 5 11335 5 ..555566 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of Sum of S
Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 995 5 33..7788111 1 ..772255886 6 ..007744447 7 33..6633332 2 33..9922889 9 11..660 0 44..8800 331 1 33..9999335 5 ..887755557 7 ..115577226 6 33..6677224 4 44..3311447 7 22..220 0 55..0000 112 2 44..3355000 0 ..448833336 6 ..113399553 3 44..0044229 9 44..6655771 1 33..660 0 55..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Islam Islam Buddha Buddha Hindu Hindu Total Total N
N MMeaean n StStd. d. DeDeviviatatiion on StStd. d. ErErroror r LoLowwer er BBouound nd UUpppper er BoBounundd 95% Confidence Interval for 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Mean
Mi
Minimnimum um MaxMaximimumum
T
Te
e st of Homogene
st of Homogene ity
ity of Varia
of Variances
nces
Customer_Loyalty
Customer_Loyalty
2
2..9
95
58
8
2
2
1
13
35
5
..0
05
55
5
Levene
Levene
S
Stta
attiis
sttiic
c
d
dff1
1
d
dff2
2
S
Siig
g..
ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 3 3..99880 0 2 2 11..99990 0 33..55778 8 ..003311 7 755..00995 5 11335 5 ..555566 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of Sum of S
Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 770 0 33..7799443 3 ..775588331 1 ..009900664 4 33..6611335 5 33..9977551 1 11..660 0 55..0000 556 6 33..9966007 7 ..775577443 3 ..110011222 2 33..7755779 9 44..1166336 6 11..880 0 55..0000 110 0 33..8888000 0 ..779955554 4 ..225511557 7 33..3311009 9 44..4444991 1 22..660 0 55..0000 2 2 44..5500000 0 ..770077111 1 ..550000000 0 --11..8855331 1 1100..8855331 1 44..000 0 55..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Below than RM2000 Below than RM2000 RM2000 till RM3999 RM2000 till RM3999 RM4001 till RM5999 RM4001 till RM5999 RM6000 and above RM6000 and above Total Total N
N MMeaean n StStd. d. DeDeviviatatioion n SStdtd. . ErErroror r LoLowwer er BoBounund d UUpppper er BoBounundd 95% Confidence Interval for 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Mean
Min
Minimum imum MaxMaximuimumm
T
Te
e st of Homogene
st of Homogene ity
ity of Varia
of Variance
nce s
s
Customer_Loyalty
Customer_Loyalty
..0
06
60
0
3
3
1
13
34
4
..9
98
81
1
Levene
Levene
S
Stta
attiis
sttiic
c
d
dff1
1
d
dff2
2
S
Siig
g..
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 1 1..66447 7 3 3 ..55449 9 ..99550 0 ..441188 7 777..44227 7 11334 4 ..557788 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of Sum of S
Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 1 1 44..0000000 0 . . . . . . . . 44..000 0 44..0000 113 3 33..5533885 5 ..775544447 7 ..220099225 5 33..0088225 5 33..9999444 4 22..440 0 44..8800 330 0 33..8866667 7 ..772266551 1 ..113322664 4 33..5599554 4 44..1133779 9 22..440 0 55..0000 778 8 33..9900551 1 ..776611990 0 ..008866227 7 33..7733333 3 44..0077669 9 11..880 0 55..0000 114 4 44..0044229 9 ..888888114 4 ..223377337 7 33..5533001 1 44..5555557 7 11..660 0 55..0000 2 2 44..0000000 0 ..000000000 0 ..000000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..000 0 44..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Primary Primary Secondary Secondary HSC/Diploma HSC/Diploma Degree Degree Postgraduate Postgraduate Others Others Total Total N
N MMeaean n StStd. d. DeDeviviatatioion n StStd. d. ErErroror r LoLowwer er BoBounund d UUpppper er BoBounundd 95% Confidence Interval for 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Mean
Mi
Minimnimum um MaMaxiximumumm
Test of Homogene
Test of Homogene ity ity of Variancesof Variances Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty .918 .918aa 4 4 11332 2 ..445566 Levene Levene S
Sttaattiissttiic c ddff1 1 ddff2 2 SSiigg..
Groups w
Groups with only one case are ith only one case are ignored inignored in com
computing the puting the test of homogeneity of test of homogeneity of variance for
variance for CustomCustomer_Loyalty.er_Loyalty. a.
a.
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 1 1..99885 5 5 5 ..33997 7 ..66880 0 ..663399 7 777..00990 0 11332 2 ..558844 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of Sum of S
Descriptives Descriptives Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty 3 3 33..5533333 3 ..446611888 8 ..226666667 7 22..3388660 0 44..6688007 7 33..000 0 33..8800 880 0 33..8899550 0 ..775599773 3 ..008844994 4 33..7722559 9 44..0066441 1 11..880 0 55..0000 8 8 44..0077550 0 ..339999111 1 ..114411111 1 33..7744113 3 44..4400887 7 33..440 0 44..8800 444 4 33..8822773 3 ..885500227 7 ..112288118 8 33..5566888 8 44..0088558 8 11..660 0 55..0000 3 3 44..0000000 0 ..000000000 0 ..000000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..0000000 0 44..000 0 44..0000 11338 8 33..8877883 3 ..775599773 3 ..006644667 7 33..7755004 4 44..0000661 1 11..660 0 55..0000 Goverment Goverment Private Private Own Business Own Business Student Student Others Others Total Total N
N MMeaean n SStdtd. . DeDevviiatatiion on SStdtd. . EErrrror or LoLowwer er BBouound nd UUpppper er BBououndnd 95% Confidence Interval for 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Mean
Mi
Minimnimum um MaxMaximimumum
T
Te
e st of Homogene
st of Homogene ity
ity of Varia
of Variance
nce s
s
Customer_Loyalty
Customer_Loyalty
3
3..2
23
31
1
4
4
1
13
33
3
..0
01
14
4
Levene
Levene
S
Stta
attiis
sttiic
c
d
dff1
1
d
dff2
2
S
Siig
g..
ANOVA ANOVA Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty ..88448 8 4 4 ..22112 2 ..33660 0 ..883366 7 788..22227 7 11333 3 ..558888 7 799..00775 5 113377 Between Groups Between Groups Within Groups Within Groups Total Total Sum of Sum of S
More free assignment, please visit:
More free assignment, please visit: www.scribdblog.comwww.scribdblog.com
POST HOC TESTS
POST HOC TESTS
Multiple
Multiple ComComparisonsparisons Dependent
Dependent Variable: Customer_LoyaltyVariable: Customer_Loyalty Tukey HSD Tukey HSD --..221122550 0 ..115544227 7 ..33556 6 --..5577881 1 ..11553311 --..5566889955* * ..222288550 0 ..00337 7 --11..1111004 4 --..00227744 ..221122550 0 ..115544227 7 ..33556 6 --..1155331 1 ..55778811 --..335566445 5 ..225533557 7 ..33441 1 --..9955774 4 ..22444455 ..5566889955* * ..222288550 0 ..00337 7 ..0022774 4 11..11110044 ..335566445 5 ..225533557 7 ..33441 1 --..2244445 5 ..99557744 (J) Race (J) Race Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Malay Malay Indian Indian Malay Malay Chinese Chinese (I) Race (I) Race Malay Malay Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Mean Mean Difference Difference
((II--JJ) ) SSttdd. . EErrr or or r SSiigg. . LLoowweer r BBoouunnd d UUppppeer r BBoouunndd 95% Confidence Interval 95% Confidence Interval
The mean difference is significant at the
The mean difference is significant at the .05 level..05 level. *.
*.
Customer_Loyalty Customer_Loyalty Tu
Tukey HSkey HSDDa,ba,b
9 95 5 33..77881111 3 31 1 33..9999335 5 33..99993355 1 12 2 44..33550000 ..55889 9 ..222299 Race Race Malay Malay Chinese Chinese Indian Indian Sig. Sig. N N 1 1 22
Subset for alpha = .05 Subset for alpha = .05
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
U
Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Sizses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 23e = 23.787.787.. a.
a.
The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the gro
of the gro up sizup sizes is used. Type I error levels arees is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.
not guaranteed. b.