• No results found

Bridge evaluation through nondestructive testing in comparison with visual inspection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Bridge evaluation through nondestructive testing in comparison with visual inspection"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: Use of NDT method
Figure 4: Form used to record Rebound reading
Figure 5: Rebound hammer test conducted on selected abutment
Figure 6: Distribution of Rebound numbers in bridge deck
+5

References

Related documents

Contains no substances known to be hazardous to the environment or not degradable in waste water treatment plants.. Will likely be mobile in the environment due to its

(1990) showed that a smoothed plot of the M, versus a covariate omitted from the fitted model provides approximately the correct functional form to be placed in the exponent of the

EGFR were observed in the HSC4 and SAS cell lines after cetuximab treatment, and the reduced 121.. levels of phosphorylated EGFR observed in the HSC3 and Ca9-22 cell lines were

We aimed to compare nutritional knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of smokers participating in smoking cessation clinics with their non-smoker family members.. Materials

In a sample of survivors of women’s cancer in the United States who completed their active cancer treatment within the last 5 years, the primary goals of this study were to evaluate

(1999), ‘ New Human Resource Initiatives in the Enterprise Sector: A Strategic Approach’, Conference on Human Resource for Development: People and Performance, 27-30 June,

reported that LIV stenosis occurred in seven hemodialysis patients using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and confirmed an anatomic relation- ship among the LIV, sternum,