Measured crop performance small grain 1971

July, 1971

Measured Crop Performance

SMALL GRAIN

1971

JOHN C. RICE, Professor

A. R. ADAMS, Research Assistant

E. L. JONES, Agricultural Research Supervisor

G. C. OLIVER, Agricultural Research Assistant

Department of Crop Science NORTH CAROLH'.A STATE UNIVERSITY

INTRODUCTION •••.••••.•••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE ••••••••••.•••••••••••••••.••.••• 5

Agencies Sponsoring Entries •••••••••••••••••••.••• 5

Test Locations ••••.••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5

Cultural Practices .••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 7

Seasonal Conditions ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ••••••••••..••••••••••••••••••••• 11

Barley •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11

Oats •.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••0• • • 12

W'h.eat ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 13

Lodging •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••0• • • •• • • •• • • 13

TABLE AND FIGURES

Cultural practices

Characteristics of varieties ••••.•••••••••••••••••

Barley performance in the Piednont ••••••••••••••••

Barley performance in the Coastal Plain •••••••••••

Oat performance in the Piedmont •••••••••••••••••••

Oat performance in the Coastal Plain ••••••••••••••

W'h.eat perfoLmance in the Pied~o~t •••.••••••0• • • • • • W'h.eat performance in the Coastal Plain ••••••••••••

Lo:::lging Data ...•.••.•••••••••••.•.•••••••••••••••• 14

15

17

18

19

20

21

22

1971

PERFORMANCE OF SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES IN NORTH CAROLINA

John C. Rice, E. L. Jones, G. C. Oliver, Ray Adams

1/

INTRODUCTION

The Official Variety Test on Small Grain varieties in North Carolina

is conducted annually by locating evaluation trials throughout the small

grain producing area of the state. These tests are conducted to determine

the value and suitability of commercially available and prospective

varieties of wheat, oats and barley for planting in North Carolina. The

results of these tests are intended to aid the growers and agricultural

workers in the selection of a variety best suited for their particular

area of the state or region.

In North Carolina the wheat production for the 1970-71 season is

expected to be 9,912,000 bushels. This production will be harvested

from 236,000 acres estimated to be 28% above the previous season's

acreage. The North Carolina production for the current season is

expected to be up 25% from the 1970 production. For 1971, the state

average yield for wheat is estimated to be 42 bushels per acre, one

bushel below last year's record yield but equal to the previous record

yield set in 1969.

I/professor in Charge of Variety Testing, Agricultural Research

The North Carolina acreage of oats planted for 1970-71 and spring

planted oats in 1971 totaled 253,000 acres. This acreage was seven

percent above the 236,000 acres planted for the 1970 crop. All small

grain acreages in North Carolina are higher for 1971, due in large

measure to the short corn crop in 1970.

Barley production for 1970 was 3,276,00 bushels and the 1970-71

crop was planted on 63,000 acreso The 1970 yield was 19 percent above the

1969 production. Yield per acre in 1970 averaged 52 bushels per acre,

an increase of two bushels over the 1969 average.

Information on varietal performance is presented from six test

locations in the state, three in the Piedmont and three in the Coastal

Plain Area. In comparing the performance of varieties, data from the

area which most nearly represents the growers' conditions should be used.

Seasonal conditions differ from year to year; therefore, a variety which

looks superior for one year may not be consistently good, hence,

varie-ties should be evaluated on the basis of performance over several years.

Depending upon the release date of the entry, data are presented for

performance from one to five years. All available datal/were used in

determining the pathologic and agronomic characteristics of the varieties.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Commercial varieties and experimental lines developed by public

and private agencies are included in these tests. Any individual or

firm may make application for having entries included by writing the

Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University at Raleigh.

A fee is charged on an entry basis for all private entries. Personnel

of the testing program may include entries about which further

infor-mation is desired.

Agencies Sponsoring Entries

Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Sta. Coker's Pedigreed Seed Company McNair Seed Company, Inc.

North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Sta. South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Sta. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Stao Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Sta.

Te s t Locations

Fayetteville, Ark. Hartsville, S. C. Laurinburg, N. C. Raleigh, No C. Clemson, So C. Blacksburg, Va. Lexington, Ky.

Six locations were used in 1970-71 with three in the Piedmont and

three in the Coastal Plain as shown in Figure 10 Four tests were located

. f

II

on pr~vate arms- an two were on researc s a 10ns. A randomized block

h 1 .

21

design with four replications was used at eac

ocat1on.-liThe cooperative spirit and civic-minded service rendered by the farmers who provided land and the necessary cultural practices for these trials and the cooperation of the county agents are gratefully acknowledged.

Figure

1971

LOCATION OF SMALL GRAIN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

• SIGNIFIES OFFICIAL VARIETY TEST LOCATIONS

CO-OPERATORS

PIEDMONT

Rowan County: Mr. Clyde McSwain, Superintendent, Piedmont Research Station, Salisbury, North Carolina

County Extension Chairman, R. R. McNeely

Stanly County: Mr. D. G. Harwood, Route 1, New London, North Carolina

County Extension Chairman, V. A. Huneycutt

Alamance County: Mr. E. C. Ingle and Son, Route 6, Burlington, North Carolina

County Extension Chairman, George R. Coble

COASTAL PLAIN

Edgecombe County: Mr. Henry Bourne, Box 1158, Tarboro, North Carolina

County Extension Chairman, Joe L. Perry

Columbus County: Mr. Wallace Dickens, Route 1, Whiteville, North Carolina

County Extension Chairman, Charles D. Raper

Cultural Practices

Cultural practices, such as seed bed preparation, date of planting,

fertilization and topdressing were in accord with good farming practices

and were uniform for all entries at a given location, Table 1. Several

months prior to planting each test location, soil samples were obtained

for the test field and fertilizer requirements made in accordance with

the soil analysis report. Lime was applied, if needed, to adjust the

pH to a desirable level for small grain production.

Starting in 1969 all tests were planted with cone-type,

tractor-mounted, spring-loaded disc equipment. The disc allowed for more accurate

seeding in areas with stubble or organic matter on the soil surface. The

seeding rate was one gram per foot of row. The rows were spaced one foot

apart. Each plot consisted of seven rows, 15 feet long with the two

out-side rows used as borders. The border rows were removed prior to harvest

and only the five center rows were harvested. The date of planting and

fertilization at planting is shown in Table 1 for each test location.

A seven foot combine was modified slightly for harvesting individual

plots. Grain from individual plots was collected as it carne from the

elevator and weighed. The combine was stopped at the end of each plot

for a short interval of time in order for the machine to clean out

between plots prior to weighing the grain from the plot. A sample of

grain was taken from each plot for the determination of test weight

and moisture. All plots were adjusted to 13% moisture. All barley samples

were run through a small thresher to remove the awns prior to taking test

under which these varieties would be harvested on farms and it appears

to give very satisfactory results.

Seasonal Conditions

The 1970-71 small grain growing season in North Carolina was

generally conducive for good growth and high yields. The six locations

for the 1970-71 Official Variety Test, three in the Piedmont and three

in the Coastal Plain Area of the state, were selected to represent small

grain production areas.

October 1970: It was dry during the early part of the month but

showers across the state loosened soil and allowed farmers to prepare

for seeding Official Variety Tests. Tests were planted on recommended

dates and good stands were obtained.

November 1970: Temperatures were normal for most of the month.

On the last seven days near-record readings, both on the high and low

side occurred. As a cold wave moved into the western part of the state

and spread to the coast, temperatures ranged from 10 degrees below zero

to the upper seventies during the day. This was a range of 90 Fahrenheit

degrees.

Rainfall was scant over most of the state during November. Nearly

half of the measuring stations had less than two inches and several

places had less than one inch.

December 1970: December was a fair weather month with little

precipitation during the latter half of the month. Average temperatures

January 1971: This month was colder than average but less severe

than the record breaking January of 1970. Average temperatures for the

month were two to four degrees below normal. Rainfall varied from one

and one-half inches to nine inches with the average for the state near

normal. Rain was reasonably well distributed throughout the state.

February 1971: Average weather was quite close to normal. It

was the warmest February in five years, but the temperatures were below

normal most of the time until the 16th. Rain was frequent with the

total in most areas near or a little more than normal.

March 1971: March was more windy than usual with average sunny

skies and abundant precipitation. An unusually late season and snow

affected nearly all of the state on the 25th and 26th. Average

temper-atures were mostly around four degrees below normal.

April 1971: April is usually the month showing the most rapid

rise in temperature of the year, but the 1971 April warmed up very littleo

Average temperature at the end of the month was the same as at the

beginning. Freezing weather was reported as late as the 30th at some

places. Average temperature for the month was two to five degrees

below normal. It was the coldest April since 1961. Rainfall was fairly

uniform over most of the state ranging from two to four inches.

May 1971: May showed very slow progress in the advance of the

spring season. Average temperatures were five degrees below normal and

the last week in May was cooler than the third week. These conditions

All locations in the Official Variety Test were planted on

schedule according to recommended seeding dateso A good seed bed

was present at each locations and this resulted in extremely excellent

stands. The specific planting dates, fertilizer, topdressing and harvest

dates are shown in Table 1. Lodging data was obtained where lodging

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The performance of the 1971 tests along with the previous four

years are presented by crop and area in a tabular form in this report.

Since the genetic expression of a variety is influenced greatly by the

environment, it is best to have several years' data from which to draw

conclusions. For example, if a variety appeared in the two-year average

but not in the three-year average, then it must be compared only within

the two years and not with the data in the three-year average since it

is possible that the third year could have been extremely good or poor

and not comparable.

The 1971 data presented in this report have been analyzed

statis-tically and the least significant difference (L.S.D.), in terms of

bushels per acre and pounds per bushel is given. Unless the difference

between two varieties is greater than the L.S.D., the varieties should

not be considered as being any different statistically.

Barley

Table 5 shows the performance of barley in the Piedmont. The

yields varied from a high of 88.9 bushels per acre for the variety

Rapidan and experimental line, NC 83, to 73.2 bushels for the variety,

McNair 601, for the 1971 season. A five-year average also showed the

variety, Keowee, to have the highest yield at 85.6 bushels per acre.

The test weight of 47.9 and 47.6 pounds per bushel for the varieties,

~eowee and Barsoy were the highest for the 1971 season. Keowee also

Harrison was very close with a 47.7 average for five years. All test

weights were lower for the 1971 season than for the 1970 season.

In the Coastal Plain Area, Table 6, shows the difference in yield

between varieties. The variety, Clayton, yielded higher than other

entries with an average of 84.7 bushels per acre for the 1971 season.

The Barsoy variety had the highest test weight with an average of 48.4

pounds per bushel. Most test weight data was lower than for the 1970

season.

Over the five-year average, the variety, Keowee, had the highest

yield at 80.6 bushels per acre and Harrison had the highest test weight

with an average of 48.3 pounds per bushel.

Oats

The data from the oat trials in the Piedmont are presented in

Table 7. The yields for 1971 were somewhat lower than in 1970.

Va. 65-32-21 was the highest yielding with an a'verage of 126.2 bushels

per acre. The test weights were much lower with NC 161 having a top

of 35.4 pounds per bushel.

Yancey had the highest five-year yield with 107.9 bushels per

acre while Coker 242 had the highest test weight of 36.1 pounds per

bushel.

In the Coastal Plain Area, Table 8, the oat yields varied from a

high of 119.9 bushels per acre for Ora to 75.1 bushels for Yancey.

There was a difference of 44.8 bushels per acre between the high and

pounds per bushel. Over a five-year average, Ora had the highest

yield of 108.8 and also had the highest test weight of 37.3.

Wheat

Table 9 shows the data on the wheat trials in the Piedmont. The

experimental line, NC 7, had the highest yield with 67.6 bushels per

acre. Coker 68-15, with an average of 58.2 pounds per bushel, had the

highest test weight.

Over a five-year period, Blueboy had the highest yield of 68.9 and

Coker 65-20 had the highest test weight of 59.5 pounds per bushel.

The Coastal Plain data are presented in Table 10. NC 7 led the

test with an average of 65.8 bushels per acre. Arthur had the best

test weight with 58.7 and all test weight data were below the 1970

season.

Blueboy and Coker 65-20 were the only two varieties tested for

f~ve years. Blueboy had an average of 61.0 bushels per acre and Coker 65-20 had an average test weight of 56.5 pounds per bushel.

Lodging

Lodging data are given in Table 11. A one-year, two-year, three-year

and four-year comparison is shown with notation giving the number of

locations where lodging occurredo In 1971 a total of six locations was

used for lodging data. If no lodging was recorded at a specific location,

data on this location was used for the average along with percent lodging

Area and Fertilizer Topdress-1/ Date of Date of

cooperator lbs/A &Grade lbs/A and date planting harvesting

Piedmont Area

Stanly County 400 lbs. 30 N (liquid) Oct. 6 Barley - June 14

D. G. Harwood 2-12-12 Feb. 18 Oats &Wheat - June 14

Alamance County 600 lbs. 50 N (liquid) Oct. 9 Barley - June 9

E. C. Ingle &Son 2-12-12 Feb. 18 Oats &Wheat - June 21

Rowan County 400 lbs. 45 N (liquid) Oct. 7 Barley - June 9

Clyde McSwain 40-130-60 Feb. 18 Oats &Wheat - June 21

..., ~

Coastal Plain Area

Edgecombe County 400 lbs. 55 N (liquid) Oct. 13 Barley &Wheat - June 8

Henry Bourne 2-6-12 Feb. 15 Oats - Discarded

Sampson County 600 lbs. 55 N (liquid) Oct. 8 Barley - June 7

W. N. Waters 3-9-18 Feb. 19 Oats &Wheat - June 7

Columbus County 250 lbs. 200 (33.5) A. N. Oct. 12 Barley - June 4

Wallace Dickens 10-20-20 Feb. 19 Oats &Wheat - June 4

Loose Leaf

smut Mildew rust Scald Lodging Winter Test

Variety resist- resist- resist- resist- resist- hardi- Maturity Weight

ance ance ance ance ance ness lb/bu.

McNair 601 Fair Good Fair Fair Good Good Early Med.

Keowee Fair Good Fair Fair Good Good Early High

Clayton Fair Good Excellent Fair Good Good Early Med.

Colonial 2 Fair Good Fair Poor Fair Good Early Med.

Harrison Fair Good Fair Fair Excellent Excellent Early High

Wade Fair Poor Excellent Fair Excellent Good Early High

Rapidan Fair Good Good Fair Good Good Early Med.

Barsoy Fair Good Fair Fair Good Good Very Early High

---~

Table 3. Characteristics of oat varieties* VI

Crown

rust Smut Blight Mosaic Winter Lodging Height Test

Variety resist- resist- resist- resist- Maturity Hardi- resist- of Weight

ance ance ance ance ness ance Straw lb/bu.

Ora Fair Good Good Poor Med. Good Excellent Med. High

Carolee** Fair Good Good Fair Med. Good Good Med. Med.

Yancey Fair Good Good Fair Early Good Excellent Med. Med. High

Roanoke Fair Poor Good Good Late Good Fair Tall High

Coker 242 Good Good Good Fair Med. Fair Good Med. High

Coker 66-22 Good Good Excellent Good Early Good Good Med. Med.

Bruce Fair Good Good Good Med. Good Good Med. Med. High

Leaf Soft

rust Mildew Mosaic Winter Lodging Height Test Wheat

Variety resis t- resist- resist- Maturity Hardi- resist- of Weight Milling

ance ance ance ness ance Straw lb/bu. Quality

Arthur Good Good Good Med. Good Good Short High Good

Blueboy Fair Good Good Med. Excellent Excellent Semi- Low Good

dwarf

Coker 65-20** Good Good Fair Med. Fair Good Med. Med. Good

McNair 2203 Good Fair Fair Med. Good Good Semi- Low Fair ...

dwarf 0'\

Coker 68-19 Good Good Good Med. Fair Good Semi- High Fair

dwarf

*These characterizations based upon all available observations.

Table 5. Summary of BARLEY performance trials in the PIEDMONT

Variety 1 yr. Avg.1

.1

2

.1

bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu

Wade 81.0 46.6 79.3 46.9 73.5 46.3 73.5 46.8 70.7 46.9 Harrison 73.6 46.8 88.0 47.8 80.5 47.3 81.5 47.6 800 6 47.7

Colonial 2 75.1 42.8 75.6 42.7 70.2 42.1 70.0 42.8 68.8 43.2 Clayton 75.4 44.0 80.5 44.6 74.6 44.1 76.0 44.6 74.0 45.1 Keowee 85.2 47.9 91.2 48.2 84.8 47.5 87.6 47.6 85.6 47.9 McNair 601 73.2 43.4 79.8 44.2 73 ..8 43.5 76.0 44.0 74.0 44.6 Rapidan 88.9 43.0 95.0 44.2 88.2 43.3

Barsoy 87.8 47.6 *N.C. 49 76.1 44.1 *N.C. 83 88.9 44.0 Mean of Test 80.5 45.0 L.S.D. (.05) 12.8 1.1 (.01) 17.0 1.4 C.V. ( % ) 11 2

l/Average of Stanly, Alamance and Rowan County locations. IIAverage of six locations.

Table 6. Summary of BARLEY performance in the COASTAL PLAIN

Variety 1 yr. Avg.1 1 2 yr. Avg.2:..! 3 yr. Avg.11 4 yr. Avg.!!..! 5 yr. Avg.51 or Line 1971 1970-1971 1969-1971 1968-1971 1967-1971

bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu Keowee 84.0 47.6 79.2 49.0 74.3 48.0 81.4 47.7 80.6 47.9 Colonial 2 81.0 43.1 77.3 44.4 70.9 43.7 75.9 43.5 75.2 43.8 Clayton 84.7 43.6 76.8 45.2 69.0 44.5 75.8 44.6 76.0 45.1 McNair 601 83.9 45.1 78.0 46.6 74.0 45.9 79.7 45.8 77.1 46.1 Harrison 64.7 46.3 64.5 49.2 58.6 48.6 63.8 48.1 66.7 48.3 Rapidan 83.0 44.2 75.9 45.9 70.1 45.2

Wade 79.9 46.0

Barsoy 79.6 48.4 *N.C. 49 79.5 46.0 *N.C. 83 69.0 43.5 Mean of Test 78.9 45.4 L.S.D. (.05)

(.01) C. V. ( % )

10.3 1.5 13.7 2.0

9 2

l/Average of Sampson, Columbus and Edgecome County locations. llAverage of six locations.

llAverage of eight locations.

~/Averageof ten locations.

21Aver age of twelve locations.

Table 7. Summary of OAT performance trials in the PIEDMONT

Variety 1 yr. Avg.!/ 2 yr. AVg.1:.1 3 yr-. Avg.11 4 yr. AVg.!!..! 5 yr. Avg.

2l

bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu

Caro1ee 99.1 33.6 105.2 34.6 99.0 34.0 104.3 34.0 104.9 33.8 Roanoke 80.9 33.6 87.7 36.3 81.8 35.4 86.3 35.5 89.2 36.0 Coker 242 87.0 34.7 110.2 36.7 103.8 35.7 106.8 35.8 106.7 36.1 Yancey 107.1 34.2 113.6 35.6 105.2 34.9 107.4 34.9 107.9 34.8 Coker 66-22 84.2 34.3 102.6 36.2 101.9 35.5 105.4 35.6 107.1 36.0 *Va. 65-32-21 126.2 35.0 132.6 37.0 122.6 35.9 121.0 35.7

*N.C. 161 101.8 35.4 114.9 36.8 *N.C. 73 9101 33.2

*N.C. 2469-2 89.7 33.2 Bruce 88.7 34.8 Mean of Test 95.6 34.2 L.S.D. (.05) 20.0 1.0 (.01) 26.5 1.4 C.V. ( % ) 15 2

l/Average of Stanly, Alamance and Rowan County locations. llAverage of six locations.

Table 8. Summary of OAT performance trials in the COASTAL PLAIN

Variety 1 yr. Avg.1.l 2 yr. Avg.

1J

.1

bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu

Caro1ee 112.8 32.2 103.0 35.0 96.4 34.7 102.0 35.0 102.4 35.0 Roanoke 82.2 32.9 78.6 36.2 73.6 35.8 77.3 36.3 77.3 36.1 Coker 242 109.5 36.0 104.0 37.7 96.4 36.9 100.2 37.1 100.3 37.1 Yancey 75.1 33.3 79.2 35.8 81.5 35.4 90.2 35.8 93.0 35.7 Ora 119.9 34.8 108.2 36.9 102.1 36.9 108.0 37.3 108.8 37.3 Coker 66-22 97.6 34.0 99.0 36.4 92.4 35.9 98.2 36.2

*Va. 65-32-21 114.6 33.4 106.2 36.1 103.5 35.7 109.4 36.0 *N.C. 161 115.7 34.1 103.0 36.8

*N.C. 73 116.4 31.4 *N.C. 2469-2 91.9 31.7 Mean of Test 103.6 33.4 L.S.D. (.05) 17.2 1.2 (.01) 23.0 1.6

C.V. ( % ) 12 2

l/Average of Columbus and Sampson County locations.

1J

Table 9. Summary of WHEAT performance trials in the PIEDMONT

Variety 1 yr. Avg.1 1 2 yr. Avg.l:.I 3 yr. Avg.

1

.1

bu/A lbs/bu bu/A lbs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A lbs/bu bu/A lbs/bu Blueboy 61.2 54.6 72.4 55.6 69.2 55.5 71.0 56.0 68.9 56.6 Coker 65-20 47.3 54.4 58.8 56.1 59.4 56.3 61.4 57.2 60.2 57.6 Arthur 59.1 57.1 67.2 58.1 64.0 58.0 64.8 58.4

*N.C. 7 67.6 54.6 77.6 55.9 72.4 55.6 *Coker 68-15 57.8 58.2 68.2 59.0

*N.C. 123 60.6 55.6 71.4 56.9 *N.C. 124 62.8 56.3 73.2 57.4 *McNair 1587 63.1 54.5 73.0 55.5 *McNair 4823 60.0 57.5 71.5 58.4 *N.C. 2 58.9 54.7

Mean of Test 59.8 55.7 L.S.D. (.05) 7.0 .8 (.01) 9.3 1.0 C.V. ( % ) 8 1

l/Average of Stanly, Alamance and Rowan County locations. l/Average of six locations.

llAverage of nine locations.

Table 10. Summary of WHEAT performance trials in the COASTAL PLAIN

Variety 1 yr. Avg

.1.1

bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu bu/A 1bs/bu

B1ueboy 52.0 48.0 48.8 53.2 55.0 53.4 60.6 54.1 61.0 55.0

Coker 65-20 63.1 51.1 54.6 55.5 54.7 55.2 56.9 55.8 53.8 56.5

*N.C. 7 65.8 49.2 58.4 54.4 60.3 54.3

Coker 68-19 52.9 52.2 49.0 57.5 53.8 57.0

*Coker 68-15 52.9 54.6 49.4 59.0

*N.C. 123 57.6 48.8 51.8 54.5

*N.C. 124 57.4 49.6 52.0 55.0

McNair 2203 61.8 54.4 53.4 57.3

Arthur 63.9 58.7

*N.C. 2 54.8 47.4

*McNair 701 59.4 55.5

*McNair 1813 58.1 54.5

Mean of Test 58.3 52.0

L.S.D. (.05) 7.5 1.8

(.01) 9.9 2.3

C.V. ( % ) 9

l/Average of Sampson, Columbus and Edgecombe County locations.

llAverage of six locations.

llAverage of eight locations.

!!.IAverage of ten locationso

Table 11. Variety or Line Keowee Colonial 2 Clayton McNair 601 Wade Harrison Rapidan Barsoy N.C. 49 N.C. 83 Lodging Data

1 yr. Avg. 2 yr. Avg. 3 yr. Avg. 4 yr. Avg.

1971

1/

.l

2

.1

1968-1971~/

17.4 17.6 22.8 25.5

28.4 3606 39.6 47.6

18.3 23.3 29.4 30.9

21.0 _{23.55/ 27.0 6/ 30.7 7/}

18.3 34.2- 29.~ 35.~

8.0 7.5 10.2 9.8

14.7 17.4 20.6

12.8 18.3 6.6 OATS 1971 Caro1ee None Roanoke None

Coker 242 None

Yancey None

Ora None

Coker 66-22 None

Va. 65-32-21 None

N.C. 161 None

N.C. 73 None

N.C. 2469-2 None

Bruce None

WHEAT 1971

B1ueboy None

Coker 65-20 None

Arthur None

N.C. 7 None

Coker 68-19 None

Coker 68-15 None

N.C. 123 None

N.C. 124 None

McNair 1587 None

McNair 2203 None

McNair 4823 None

N.C. 2 None

McNair 701 None

McNair 1813 None

1970-1971~j

1970-1971·f /

1969-19719/ 29.3 28.1 26.2 28.6 12/ 20.6-32.1 19.9

1969-1971

1

.1

1968-197110/ 29.9 33.1 25.0 26.913/ 19.8-36.7 19.1

1968-1971~.I

18.cr=-1/ _{of locations.} 8/

- Average six - Average of eleven locations. 2/ _{of twelve locations.} 9/ of sixteen locations.

- Average - Average

3/ _{of seventeen locations.} 10/Average of twenty-two locations. - Average

4/ _{of twenty-three locations.} 11/ of eight locations.

- Average - Average

5/ _{of nine locations.} 12/ of thirteen locations.

- Average - Average

6/ _{of fourteen locations.} 11lAverage of nineteen locations. - Average

7/ _{of twenty locations.} 14/ of twenty-four locations.