• No results found

Strategic Geometric Design Research (Ray)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Strategic Geometric Design Research (Ray)"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

AGENDA

2009 Joint Meeting of

TRB Operational Effects of Geometrics Committee (AHB65) TRB Geometric Design Committee (AFB10)

J. Eric Jonsson Center--Woods Hole/Falmouth, Massachusetts July 10, 2008

10:30 am – 12:00 pm

1. Call to Order (Krammes): Ray Krammes called the meeting to order.

2. Welcome and Introductions (Ray/Krammes): Brian Ray and Ray Krammes welcomed the 23 committee members and 4 friends in attendance, and circulated an attendance

roster.

3. Joint Subcommittees (Krammes)

a. 4th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design (Harwood): Doug

reported that the Symposium will be Wednesday to Friday June 2-4, 2010 in

Valencia Spain. Workshops will be offered Wednesday morning; workshop

topics include: visualization, crash modeling, and (tentatively) managed lanes and

freeway systems. The Symposium proper runs Wednesday afternoon June 2

through Friday morning June 4. It will feature an opening plenary session, 15

concurrent podium and 1 poster sessions, and a dinner Thursday evening. On

Saturday June 5 a technical tour will be offered featuring freeway projects in the

Valencia area. There’s also the possibility of a seminar Tuesday June 1 on the

Highway Safety Manual. The registration fee will be approximately US$500,

including Thursday lunch, Thursday dinner, and technical tour. There will be

additional fees for the Workshops and Highway Safety Manual seminar. Hotel

rates will be no higher than Woods Hole (approximately 90-100 Euros). The call

for papers resulted in 179 abstracts from 30 countries, of which accepted 110

(2)

review. In addition, 18 country report abstracts accepted. Transportation to

Valencia usually includes connections through Madrid, Paris or Frankfurt. Delta

has nonstop flights from New York to Valencia. A show of hands indicated 14

definitely planning to attend and 11 giving serious consideration.

b. Joint Subcommittee on Intersections (Knapp): Keith reported that the Joint

Subcommittee is helping with white papers and updating needs statements, and

this activity will be continuing for next 6 months. The Joint Subcommittee is also

coordinating on 2 possible 2010 Annual Meeting sessions: one on systematic

versus hot-spot improvement strategies, and the other on accessibility at

intersections.

4. Strategic Geometric Design Research (Ray)

a. 2009 Mid-Year Meeting: Recap and Follow up (Donnell): Eric indicated that

recorders would pull information together and get to group leaders as soon as

possible. There was discussion of problem statement submissions for the FY

2011 NCHRP program and how many should be submitted. Brian Ray, Doug

Harwood, and Jim Brewer agreed to coordinate communication with Mark Marek

of the AASHTO Technical Committee on Geometric Design. Will ask Mark

when need. Jim will also engage in discussions with TC. Next, there was

discussions of priority research needs of the TRB committees that we believe are

of interest to AASHTO. The committee will recommend the following to the

AASHTO Technical Committee (names in parentheses are the individuals who

volunteered to draft the problem statements): Vehicle paths at curves (Larry

Shannon); Multilane loop ramps (Geoff Millen, Joel Leisch); Auxiliary turn

lanes (Pat Hasson, Jim Brewer, Marcus Brewer, Keith Knapp); Safety effects of

(3)

ramp and ramp terminal design (David McDonald, Joel Leisch). Eric will add

these problem statements to TRB’s Research Needs Statements web site.

Regarding NCHRP synthesis topics, group leaders were charged with prioritizing

which topics are recommended for submission and drafting sythesis topic

descriptions by the annual meeting. We will shoot for submission of 4-5 synthesis

topics by Feb. 1.

b. Possible 2009 Mid-Year Meeting Webinar (Ray): There was discussion about a

possible webinar to seek input from folks who were not able to attend the

mid-year meeting. A decision will be made by September on whether on not to hold a

webinar.

c. Obtaining input from others (i.e, AASHTO, ITE, other TRB committees) (Ray)

i. After 2010 TRB: Feb or March?

ii. 2011 Mid-year meeting follow up: hope to have finalized by then

iii. New ways to get engaged for next update of Green Book

iv. Share with other TRB committees; ITE, ASCE etc. How? What

do at 2010 Annual Meeting. For ITE, work through relevant councils:

Traffic Engineering, most other than Safety, Kay will be point of contact

with Traffic Engineering. ITE practitioner network wide. APWA through

Marshal Elizer.

5. TRB Staff report (Cunard): Rich indicated that the Annual Meeting paper submission is August 1. The Hilton will be undergoing major renovations; as a result, TRB will be

losing 50 percent of the meeting space in Hilton. A combination of measures is

envisioned to accommodate the lost space: (1) Reduce the number of sessions by 10

percent, (2) Limit committee meetings to only 1 hour 45 min; (3) Move the Human

(4)

including Wednesday and some committee meetings on Thursday; (5) Schedule more

papers in poster sessions; and (6) Use smaller meeting rooms.

6. Planning Issues—Activities during 2010 TRB Annual Meeting (Krammes) a. Workshops:

i. The Operational Effects of Geometrics Committee plans 2 workshops:

Alternative Intersections and Interchange: Informational Report, and

Implementing Self-Enforcing, Self-Explaining Roads in the USA

ii. The Geometric Design Committee plans 1 workshop: Graduate

Student: methodology

b. Sessions:

i. Operational Effects of Geometrics Committee is considering sponsoring or

co-sponsoring the following sessions:

1. Effective Utilization of Freeway Cross Section (lane and shoulder width issues)

2. Emerging Needs for and Sources of Traffic Data: Regional Transportation Systems and Operations. Opportunity to express needs for safety prediction models.

3. Freeway Safety & Operations: Effective use of the cross section: examples of projects that have addressed issues with lane width and shoulder width: 3 speakers on particular projects. Joint with Managed Lanes & HOV Systems. Jerry will help.

4. Self-Enforcing Contextual Geometrics

5. Strategic Geometric Design Research Agenda (e.g., a panel consisting of white paper group leads)

6. Intersections Joint Subcommittee: 2 possible topics:

a. Systematic versus hot-spot improvement approaches (possibly jointly with Transportation Safety Management) b. Accessibility at Intersections (with Accessibility &

Pedestrian committees)

ii. Geometric Design Committee is considering sponsoring the

following sessions:

(5)

2. Paper submissions

3. Fall back on strategic research

4. HSM geometric design issues

7. Announcements and Other Issues of Joint Interest

a. 4th Urban Street Symposium (Gattis/Fitzpatrick): Jim and Kay are reaching out to

practitioners by coordinating with an ITE district meeting; Jim met with the board

of the Midwest District, which tentatively agreed to hold the Symposium jointly

with their district meeting on June 25-27, 2012. There was discussion about

whether 2012 was an appropriate date, and whether the Symposium could be

financially viable given the current state of the economy. Rich Cunard will need

to negotiate with the ITE district on financial issues and logistics responsibilities.

There was also discussion of where to hold the Symposium. Chicago was

recommended, given the committees’ connections there. Rich suggested Boston,

Orlando, Atlanta, and Minneapolis as alternatives.

b. 9th Access Management Conference will be held Oct 10-13, 2010, in Natchez,

MS.

c. The TRB Access Management Committee is planning to co-sponsor an

International Conference on Access Management in Athens, Greece during June

2011.

d. The AASHTO Technical Committee on Geometric Design is working on the next

edition of the Green Book. They will meet in the October – November time

frame. Their goal is to have the document ready for balloting in early 2010.

e. Our 2011 mid-year meeting may be held jointly with the AASHTO Technical

References

Related documents

Consistently, transfection of miR-424 decreased COP1 protein level and increased concomitantly the level of c-Jun and ETV1, known COP1 targets (16, 19), in both RWPE1 and LNCaP

To establish the duration whereby the micro-lysimeters used to measure the seedling ET were representative of cotton plants in the surrounding area, we measured and compared the

As a positive control, normal numbers of resident DCs from Nr4a3 –/– mice repopulated the MLNs (Supplemental Figure 9), suggesting that the defect was selective for mDCs.. We

Forth, influence coefficient of logistics industry is much higher than its sensitivity coefficient, and the influ- ence coefficient greater than the average one while the

Our findings in Rpl13a-snoless mice of lower oxidative stress, less β cell death, and improved glucose tolerance following chemical provocation of diabetes and

Adoptive transfer of CD153 + PD-1 + CD44 hi CD4 + T cells from HFD-fed Spp1 −/− mice failed to induce VAT inflammation or insulin resistance, indi- cating a crucial role of the

2) Coefficient of drag increased. This increased drag force, which is the main driving element of a vertical axis turbomachine. 3) I) The variation of modal deformations in

The results showed a significant improvement in speech perception in noise scores when speech and noise are presented from the front (S0/N0), and when speech is presented from