• No results found

Implementing & Delegated Acts

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Implementing & Delegated Acts"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Implementing & Delegated Acts

Some Principles

(2)

‘filling in the gaps’

or

‘dealing with details’

Executive Acts: why?

(3)

Commission

EP Council

CO-DECISION

PROPOSES LEGISLATION

Legislative Process

(4)

Default = execution by the Member States

Article 291 of the Treaty (TFEU)

1. Member States shall adopt all measures of national law

necessary to implement legally binding Union acts.

(5)

Default = execution by the Member States

• Explicit delegation

• Implicit delegation

(6)

Example of explicit delegation

Article 13 of the Draft Regulation Supervisory body

1. Member States shall designate an appropriate body ...

Supervisory bodies shall be given all supervisory and investigatory

powers that are necessary for the exercise of their tasks.

(7)

Example of implicit delegation

Article 5 of the Draft Regulation

Mutual recognition and acceptance

When an electronic identification using an electronic identification means and authentication is required under national legislation or administrative practice to access a service online, any electronic identification means issued in another Member State falling under a scheme included in the list

published by the Commission pursuant to the procedure referred to in

Article 7 shall be recognised and accepted for the purposes of accessing this

service.

(8)

Commission

EP Counil

CO-DECISION

PROPOSES LEGISLATION

Legislative process: second possibility

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACTS

EP Commission Council

(+ experts)

12to48monthsstoseveralmonths

(9)

Uniformity: one single executive act at the EU level

Speed: faster than co-decision

Efficient: does not block EP/Council

Reactive: no need to convene ministers, MEPs

Expertise: technical details need specialist knowledge But:

• Democracy?

• Accountability?

• Transparency?

WHY?

(10)

• Implementing Acts

• Delegated Acts

2 Types of Executive Acts

(11)

1. Implementing Acts

Article 291 TFEU

1.

2. Where uniform conditions for implementing legally binding Union acts are needed, those acts shall confer implementing powers on the Commission, ...

3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall lay down in advance the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.

4. The word "implementing" shall be inserted in the title of implementing acts.

(12)
(13)
(14)

2. Delegated Acts

Article 290 TFEU

1. A legislative act may delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act.

The objectives, content, scope and duration of the delegation of power shall be explicitly defined in the

legislative acts. The essential elements of an area shall be reserved for the legislative act and accordingly shall not be the subject of a delegation of power.

2. Legislative acts shall explicitly lay down the conditions to which the delegation is subject; these conditions may be as follows:

(a) the European Parliament or the Council may decide to revoke the delegation;

(b) the delegated act may enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by the European Parliament or the Council within a period set by the legislative act.

For the purposes of (a) and (b), the European Parliament shall act by a majority of its component members, and the Council by a qualified majority.

(15)

Delegated Acts

Article 290 TFEU

1. A legislative act may delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act.

The objectives, content, scope and duration of the delegation of power shall be explicitly defined in the

legislative acts. The essential elements of an area shall be reserved for the legislative act and accordingly shall not be the subject of a delegation of power.

2. Legislative acts shall explicitly lay down the conditions to which the delegation is subject; these conditions may be as follows:

(a) the European Parliament or the Council may decide to revoke the delegation;

(b) the delegated act may enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by the European Parliament or the Council within a period set by the legislative act.

For the purposes of (a) and (b), the European Parliament shall act by a majority of its component members, and the Council by a qualified majority.

(16)

BASIC ACT

WHO’S INVOLVED (in both cases)?

COMMISSION ADOPTS NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT Consults expert

committees

Commission proposes

Legislator (EP & Council)

controls (scrutiny or

veto)

(17)

Around 250 committees of national experts, chaired by the Commission

WHO’S INVOLVED

(18)

Delegated acts

Non-legislative act

Amend/supplement legislation

Non-essential

(19)

Delegated acts

Non-legislative act Amend/supplement legislation Non-essential

Implementing acts

Non-legislative act Implement legislation

Often essential

(20)

No formal committees of national experts:

Commission formally acts alone

(but… informal consultation with national experts)

No horizontal procedure, only treaty rules:

Legislator decides case-by-case on how to delegate (but… ‘common understanding’ to avoid confusion)

Strong powers for legislator

Either EP or Council can veto measure or revoke power

Inter-institutional parity

DELEGATED ACTS: KEY FEATURES

(21)

No formal committees of national experts:

Commission formally acts alone

(but… informal consultation with national experts)

No horizontal procedure, only treaty rules:

Legislator decides case-by-case on how to delegate (but… ‘common understanding’ to avoid confusion)

Strong powers for legislator:

Either EP or Council can veto measure or revoke power

Inter-institutional parity:

DELEGATED ACTS: KEY FEATURES

(22)

No horizontal procedure, only treaty rules:

Legislator decides case-by-case on how to delegate – in terms of objectives, content, duration and scope

Common understanding gives basic models:

‘COMMON UNDERSTANDING’

(23)
(24)

No formal committees of national experts:

Commission formally acts alone

(but… informal consultation with national experts)

No horizontal procedure, only treaty rules:

Legislator decides case-by-case on how to delegate (but… ‘common understanding’ to avoid confusion)

Strong powers for legislator:

Either EP or Council can veto measure or revoke power

Inter-institutional parity:

DELEGATED ACTS: KEY FEATURES

(25)

EP and Council cannot amend draft measures

‘Nuclear options’: veto or revoke power

Big majorities needed to veto or revoke:

• EP: absolute majority of all MEPs

• Council: qualified majority

Any reason allowed for veto or revocation

VETOING OR REVOKING POWERS

(26)

Formal committees of national experts:

Commission cannot act as it wishes

Horizontal procedures laid down by EP and Council:

‘Advisory’ and ‘examination’ procedures

Weaker powers for legislator:

Only right of scrutiny – oblige Commission to review act

IMPLEMENTING ACTS: KEY

FEATURES

(27)

Formal committees of national experts:

Commission cannot act as it wishes

Horizontal procedures set by EP and Council:

‘Advisory’ and ‘examination’ procedures

Weaker powers for legislator:

Only right of scrutiny – oblige Commission to review act Inter-institutional disparity

IMPLEMENTING ACTS: KEY

FEATURES

(28)

Advisory procedure:

• ‘Default’ procedure

• Used for funding decisions; less controversial measures

• Commission takes ‘utmost account’ of committee’s views Examination procedure:

Applies to issues of ‘general scope’ or ‘sensitive topics’ – e.g. trade, taxation, health, environment, agriculture, …

• Committee votes on measures

• Appeal committee (deputy perm reps) may intervene Member states keep significant control

IMPLEMENTING ACTS: TWO PROCEDURES

(29)
(30)

EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

Commission proposes

QM +

COM may adopt unless:

Simple majority against Basic act forbids

‘Sensitive topic’

EXAMINATION COMMITTEE

No QM

QM - ACT ADOPTED

COM acts:

(Within two months) Submits new draft act (Within one month) Send to appeal cttee

(31)

EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

QM +

COM may adopt unless:

Multilateral trade safeguard On sensitive issues, decision must reflect predominant view APPEAL COMMITTEE

No QM

QM - ACT ADOPTED

ACT NOT ADOPTED

(32)

Delegated acts Implementing acts

Supplement and amend ‘non essential elements’

Role

Provide uniform conditions for

implementing EU acts General application

Scope

General or individual

application No (not formally)

Expert

committees

Yes

In individual legislation + ‘common understanding’

Legal basis

Horizontal EP/Council Regulation

EP/Council can veto or revoke delegation

Scrutiny

Member states can block; EP/Council scrutiny

O

VERVIEW

(33)

Draft Regulation: Delegated Acts

• Minimum technical requirements for e-ID means (art. 8.3)

• Procedures for supervision of trust service providers (art. 13.2)

• Security requirements for trust service providers (art. 15.1)

• Conditions for independent bodies carrying out the audits (art. 16)

• Information to be mentioned on the trusted lists (art. 18)

• Security levels for cross-border public sector exchange of e-signatures (art. 20)

• Further specification of Annex 1 (qualified certificates for e-signatures) (art. 21)

• Criteria to be met by designated bodies for certification of signature creation devices (art. 23)

• Further specification of requirements for validation services (art. 25)

• Idem for electronic signature preservation services (art. 27)

• Security assurrance levels for electronic seals (art. 28)

• Further specification of Annex III (qualified certificates for electronic seals) (art. 29)

(34)

Draft Regulation: Implementing Acts

2 Types

• definition of “circumstances, formats and procedures”

• examples: notification of e-ID schemes, breach notification, yearly audit, initiation of qualified trust service, publication of list of certified creation devices, etc.

• establishment of reference numbers of standards

• examples: trustworthy products and systems, security levels for e-signatures,

qualified certificates, security assurance levels of electronic seals, qualified

electronic timestamps, etc.

(35)

Conclusions

• Delegated acts provide more autonomy for the Commission but are more often under pressure of the Parliament and the Council

• Choice of procedure can be determined by strategic motives

(36)

Acknowledgment: the graphics used in this presentation are extracted from David O’Leary’s presentation for the European Training Academy

(http://www.eu-academy.eu/free-resources)

References

Related documents

Petrescu-Mag Ioan Valentin: Bioflux, Cluj-Napoca (Romania) Petrescu Dacinia Crina: UBB Cluj, Cluj-Napoca (Romania) Sima Rodica Maria: USAMV Cluj, Cluj-Napoca (Romania)

Within analyzes of production performances in Serbian agriculture are discussed the dynamics of agricultural production as well as partial productivity in

Acknowledging the lack of empirical research on design rights, our paper wishes to investigate the risk of piracy and the perceptions of the registered and unregistered design

association or relationship between potential joint em- ployers (which is helpful for the other joint employer scenario—where multiple employers suffer, permit, or otherwise

Encourage the development team to use the performance tester’s skills and resources as a development tool. Performance testing is a primary role – not an

Three repeated discursive moves can be seen as underlying trainees’ disapproval of qualified nurses: development of ‘the compassionate nurse’ with which the trainees

To illustrate this concept, I created a custom on-the-fly image analysis software that automatically selects the optimal imaging view in a multi-view SPIM experiment.. By applying

By ordinary legislative procedure, the Parliament and the Council, after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the measures for the approximation of