• No results found

A supplement to the convergence rate in a theorem of Heyde

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A supplement to the convergence rate in a theorem of Heyde"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

A supplement to the convergence rate in a

theorem of Heyde

Jianjun He

*

and Tingfan Xie

*Correspondence: [email protected]

Department of Mathematics, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

Abstract

Let{X,Xn,n≥1}be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with zero mean, set

Sn=

n

k=1Xk,EX2=

σ

2> 0, and

λ

(

) =

n=1P(|Sn| ≥n

). In this paper, the authors

discuss the rate of approximation of

σ

2by

2

λ

(

) under suitable conditions, improve the results of Klesov (Theory Probab. Math. Stat. 49:83-87, 1994), and extend the work He and Xie (Acta Math. Appl. Sin. 2012, doi:10.1007/s10255-012-0138-6).

MSC: 60F15; 60G50

Keywords: convergence rate; i.i.d. random variable; theorem of Heyde

1 Introduction and main results

Let{X,Xn,n≥}be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables, setSn=

n

k=Xk, andλ() =

n=P(|Sn| ≥n). Heyde [] proved that

lim →

λ() =σ,

wheneverEX=σ<∞andEX= .

There are various extensions of this result: Chen [], Gut and Spˇatara [], Lanzinger and Stadtmüller []. Liu and Lin [] introduced a new kind of complete moment convergence; Klesov [] studied the rate of approximation ofσ byλ() and proved the following Theorem A.

Theorem A Let{X,Xn,n≥}be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with zero mean, if

EX=σ> , and E|X|<, then

λ() –σ=o/, as→.

Recently, He and Xie [] obtained Theorem B which improved Theorem A. Gut and Steinebach [] extended the results of Klesov [].

Theorem B Let{X,Xn,n≥}be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables, and <δ≤, if

EX= , EX=σ>  and E|X|+δ<∞,

(2)

then

λ() –σ= ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

O(), δ= ,

o(δ),  <δ< .

LetGbe the set of functionsg(x) that are defined for all realxand satisfy the following conditions: (a)g(x) is nonnegative, even, nondecreasing in the intervalx> , andg(x)=  forx= ; (b)g(xx) is nondecreasing in the intervalx> .

Let G be the set of functions g(x)∈G satisfying the supplementary condition (c) limx→∞g(x

)

xg(x)= . Obviously, the functiong(x) =|x|

δwith  <δ<  belongs toG

and does

not belong toGifδ= . The purpose of this paper is to generalize Theorem B to the case

where the conditionE|X|+δ<is replaced by a more general conditionE|X|g(X) <

in which the functiong belongs to some subset ofG. DenoteTg(v) =EXg(X)I(|X|>v),

Tg(v) is a nonnegative nonincreasing function in the intervalv> , andlimv→∞Tg(v) = 

withEXg(X) <∞. Now we state our results as follows.

Theorem . Let{X,Xn;n≥}be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with zero mean

and EX=σ> , if EXg(X) <for some function g(x)G, and

n=

ng(√n)<∞, (.)

then

λ() –σ=O/+o()h() +f()

, as→, (.)

where f() =

n=[

]+

ng(√n), h() = [

] n= g(√n).

Theorem . Under the conditions of Theorem ., and g(x)∈G, then

λ() –σ=o()h() +f()

, as→. (.)

Throughout this paper, we suppose that C denotes a constant which only depends on some given numbers and may be different at each appearance, and that [x] denotes the integer part ofx.

2 Proofs of the main results

Before we prove the main results we state some lemmas. Lemma . is from [].(x) is the standard normal distribution function,(x) = √

π x –∞et

/

dt.

Lemma . Let{X,Xn,n≥}be a sequence of i.i.d. standard normal distribution random

variables. Then

λ() =

n=

 √

π

n

et/dt=  –

 +O

(3)

If{Xn,n≥}is a sequence of independent random variables with zero mean and finite

variance, and put EX

j =σj, Bn=nj=σj, Bikelis [] obtained the following inequality:

P

 √

Bn n

j=

Xj<x

(x)

C

B–n  +|x|–

n

j=

|u|>(+|x|)B/n

udVj(u)

+B–/n  +|x|–

n

j=

|u|≤(+|x|)B/n

|u|dVj(u)

,

for every x, where Vj(x) =P(Xj<x)is the distribution function of the random variable Xj.

By applying the above inequality to the sequence of i.i.d. random variables with zero mean and variance , and letting|x|=n, we have the following lemma.

Lemma . Let{X,Xn,n≥}be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with zero mean and

EX= . Then for any given> , we have

P|Sn|>n

–√

π

n

et/dt

C( +n)–

|u|>(+√n)√n

udV(u)

+Cn–/( +n)–

|u|≤(+√n)√n

|u|dV(u),

where V(x) =P(X<x)is the distribution function of a random variable X.

Proof of Theorem . Without loss of generality, we suppose thatσ= ,  << , and

write

λ() =I+

n=

 √

π

n

et/dt,

where

I=

n=

P|Sn|>n

–√

π

n

et/dt

.

Applying Lemma ., we obtain

λ() =I+  –

 +O

,

then

λ() –  = –

 +

 ∞

n=

Rn+O

(4)

hereRn=P(|Sn|>n) – √π ∞√net/

dt. By Lemma .,

|Rn| ≤Rn+Rn,

where

Rn=C( +

n)–

|u|>(+√n)√n

udV(u),

Rn=Cn–/( +

n)–

|u|≤(+√n)√n

|u|dV(u).

We obtain

λ() –  =

n=

Rn+ ∞

n=

Rn+O

. (.)

Firstly, we estimate∞n=Rn. Note that

n=

Rn= [

]

n=

Rn+ ∞

n=[

]+

Rn=:T+T.

Applying the conditionEXg(X) <∞, we have

lim n→∞

|u|>√n

ug(u)dV(u) = .

Therefore, for anyη> , there is an integerNsuch that |u|>√nug(u)dV(u)≤η,

when-evern>N. Hence

T≤CN

n=

|u|>√n

udV(u) +C

[

]

n=N+

( +n)–

|u|>(+√n)√n

udV(u)

CN+Cη [

]

n=N+

( +n)g(n( +n))

C

N+η [

]

n=

g(√n)

=Ch()

N

[

] n= g(√n)

+η

Ch()(N+η)

=oh()

(5)

whereh() =

[

]

n= g(√n). ForT, noting thatg(x)∈G, we have the following inequality:

T≤C ∞

n=[

]+ 

n

|u|>√n(+√n)

udV(u)

C

n=[

]+

ng(√n( +n))

|u|>√n(+√n)

ug(u)dV(u)

C

n=[

]+ 

ng(√n)

|u|>

ug(u)dV(u)

CTg

f(). (.)

Next, we estimate the second term of (.). Note that

n=

Rn =C ∞

n=

n–/( +n)–

|u|≤(√n(+√n))/|u| dV(u)

+C

n=

n–/( +n)–

(√n(+√n))/<|u|<n(+n)|

u|dV(u)

=:J+J.

ForJ, we can write

J =C

[

]

n=

+

n=[

]+

n–/( +n)–

|u|≤(√n(+√n))/|u| dV(u)

=:J+J.

Noting thatg(xx)is nondecreasing in the intervalx> , we have

J=C [

]

n=

 √

n( +n)

|u|≤(√n(+√n))/|u| dV(u)

C

[

]

n=

n/( +n)/g((n( +n))/)

|u|≤(√n(+√n))/u

g(u)dV(u)

C

[

]

n=

n/g(n/)

=Ch(), (.)

whereh() =

[

]

(6)

Similarly, we can obtain

J=C ∞

n=[

]+

 √

n( +n)

|u|≤(√n(+√n))/|

u|dV(u)

C

n=[

]+

n/( +n)/g((n( +n))/)

|u|≤(√n(+√n))/u

g(u)dV(u)

C

n=[

]+  /n/g(n/)

=C√

f(), (.)

wheref() =∞n=[

]+

n/g(n/).

ForJ, we write

J =C

[

]

n=

+

n=[

]+

n–/( +n)–

(√n(+√n))/<|u|<n(+n)|u| dV(u)

=:J+J.

Using the properties ofg(x) by simple calculation, it follows that

J=C [

]

n=

n–/( +n)–

(√n(+√n))/<|u|<n(+n)|u| dV(u)

C

N

n=

+

[

]

n=N+

( +n)g(n( +n))

×

(√n(+√n))/<|u|<n(+n)u

g(u)dV(u)

C

N

n=

+

[

]

n=N+

g(√n)

|u|>n/u

g(u)dV(u)

C

N+η [

]

n=

g(√n)

=oh()

, (.)

and

J≤C ∞

n=[

]+

n–( +n)–

(√n(+√n))/<|u|<n(+n)|u| dV(u)

C

n=[ 

]+ 

ng(√n)

(√n(+√n))/<|u|<n(+n)u

(7)

CTg

 √

n=[

]+ 

ng(√n)

CTg

 √

f(). (.)

From (.) to (.), we conclude that

λ() – C√

f() +CTg

 √

f() +o()h() +Ch(). (.)

Since

 √

f()≤

C

n=[

]+

n/ ≤C

,

and

h() = [

]

n=

ng(√n)C

[

]

n=

nC

,

by (.), we have

λ() –  =O/+o()f() +h()

.

This completes the proof of Theorem ..

Proof of Theorem . By the conditionsg(x)∈G, andlimx→∞g(x)

xg(x)= , for anyη> , there

is an integerNsuch that g( √

n)  √

ng(√n)η, whenevern>N. We have

h()≤N

n=

ng(√n)+

[

]

n=N

η

g(√n)

CN+ [

]

n=N+

η

g(√n)

CN+ [ 

]

n=

η

g(√n)

=o()h(), (.)

and

 √

f()≤  √

n=[

]+ η

n/g(n)

n=[

]+ η

(8)

By (.)-(.), note thatTg(√) =o(), as→, we have

λ() –σ=o()h() +f()

, as→.

This completes the proof of Theorem ..

Remark . Ifg(x) =|x|δ,  <δ< , thenf

() =O(δ),h() =O(δ). By Theorem ., we

get

λ() –σ=, as→.

Remark . Ifg(x) =|x|,δ= , then√

f() =O(),f() =O(),h() =O(),h() =O().

By (.), we get

λ() –σ=O(), as→.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the referees and editors for their valuable comments and some helpful suggestions that improved the clarity and readability of the paper.

Received: 27 May 2012 Accepted: 20 August 2012 Published: 4 September 2012

References

1. Heyde, CC: A supplement to the strong law of large numbers. J. Appl. Probab.12, 903-907 (1975) 2. Chen, R: A remark on the strong law of large numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.61, 112-116 (1976)

3. Gut, A, Spˇataru, A: Precise asymptotics in the Baum-Kate and Davis law of large numbers. J. Math. Anal. Appl.248, 233-246 (2000)

4. Lanzinger, H, Stadtmüller, U: Refined Baum-Katz laws for weighted sums of iid random variables. Stat. Probab. Lett.

69, 357-368 (2004)

5. Liu, WD, Lin, ZY: Precise asymptotic for a new kind of complete moment convergence. Stat. Probab. Lett.76, 1787-1799 (2006)

6. Klesov, OI: On the convergence rate in a theorem of Heyde. Theory Probab. Math. Stat.49, 83-87 (1994) 7. He, JJ, Xie, TF: Asymptotic property for some series of probability. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. (2012).

doi:10.1007/s10255-012-0138-6

8. Gut, A, Steinebach, J: Convergence rates in Precise asymptotics. J. Math. Anal. Appl.390, 1-14 (2012) 9. Bikelis, A: Estimates of the remainder in the central limit theorem. Litovsk. Mat. Sb.6, 323-346 (1966)

doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-195

References

Related documents

In consideration of the payment of the premium stated in the Schedule and subject to the terms, conditions, provisions, exclusions, and limits of liability incorporated in

Experiments were designed with different ecological conditions like prey density, volume of water, container shape, presence of vegetation, predator density and time of

Abrogation of the EGF signaling components in male cyst cells, or mutations in stet in both male and females, disrupt the normal connections that exist between the germ line and

(G,I,K) A small population of cells expressing Sox9 (arrows) and restricted to periportal areas is observed in E12.5- E18.5 control livers [arrowheads indicate nidogen expression in

(2014) conducted a descriptive study to assess the knowledge of infertile women about infertility and the causes of infertility, their treatment seeking behaviour

The research of Neza Aninda Mirza (2014) stating that the role of facebook for beginners is the voters as a means of finding information about political parties and

In eclampsia diagnosis, 6 women were having eclampsia and HELLP syndrome and 1 women having only hypertension the women which suffers from eclampsia they having

DRD1 antagonist and IFN-beta siRNA reversed effects of A68930 on neurological outcome and brain water content after ICH.. DRD1 antagonist administration and IFN-beta in vivo