• No results found

Convex isometric folding

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Convex isometric folding"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

© Hindawi Publishing Corp.

CONVEX ISOMETRIC FOLDING

E. M. ELKHOLY

(Received 27 September 1993 and in revised form 5 June 1996)

Abstract.We introduce a new type of isometric folding called “convex isometric folding.” We prove that the infimum of the ratio VolN/Volϕ(N)over all convex isometric foldings ϕ:N→N, whereNis a compact 2-manifold (orientable or not), is 1/4.

Keywords and phrases. Isometric and convex foldings, regular and universal covering spaces, manifolds, group of covering transformations, fundamental regions.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 51H10, 57N10.

1. Introduction. A mapϕ:M→N, whereMandNareC∞Riemannian manifolds of dimensionsmandn, respectively, is said to be an isometric folding ofMintoNif and only if for any piecewise geodesic pathγ:J→M, the induced pathϕ◦γ:J→Nis a piecewise geodesic and of the same length. The definition is given by Robertson [4]. The set of all isometric foldingsϕ:M→Nis denoted by᏶(M,N).

Letp :M→N be a regular locally isometric covering and let G be the group of covering transformations ofp. An isometric foldingφ∈᏶(M)is said to bep-invariant if and only if for allg∈Gand allx∈X,p(ϕ(x))=p(ϕ(g,x)). See Robertson and Elkholy [5]. The set ofp-invariant isometric foldings is denoted byi(M,p).

Definition1.1. Letϕ∈᏶(M,N), whereMandNareC∞Riemannian manifolds of dimensionsmandn, respectively. We say thatϕis a convex isometric folding if and only ifϕ(M)can be embedded as a convex set inRn.

We denote the set of all convex isometric foldings ofMintoNbyC(M,N), and if C(M,N), then it forms a subsemigroup of᏶(M,N).

Definition1.2. We say thatϕ∈i(M,p)is ap-invariant convex isometric folding

if and only ifϕ(M)can be embedded as a convex set inRm.

We denote the set ofp-invariant convex isometric foldings of M byCi(M,p). If

Ci(M,p), then for any covering map, p :M →N, Ci(M,p) is a subsemigroup

ofC(M).

To solve our main problem we need the following:

(1) Robertson and Elkholy [5] proved that ifNis ann-smooth Riemannian manifold, p:M→Nis its universal covering, andGis the group of covering transformations of p, then᏶(N)is isomorphic as a semigroup to᏶i(M,p)/G.

(2)

corresponding foldingψ∈i(M,p)maps each fiber ofpto a single point.

(3) Elkholy and Al-Ahmady [3] proved that under the same conditions of (2), ifNis a compact 2-manifold, then

VolN Volϕ(N)=

VolF

Volψ(F), (1.1)

whereF is a fundamental region ofGinM.

2. Convex isometric folding and covering spaces. The next theorem establishes the relation between the set of convex isometric folding of a manifold,C(N), and the set ofp-invariant convex isometric folding of its universal covering space,Ci(M,p).

Theorem2.1. LetNbe a manifold andp:M→Nits universal covering. LetGbe the group of covering transformations ofp. IfC(N), thenC(N)is isometric as a semigroup toCi(M,p)/G.

Proof. Let C(N)ϕ. Then by using (1), there exists an isomorphism f from ᏶i(M,p)/Ginto᏶(N). SinceCi(M,p)is a subsemigroup of᏶i(M,p),Ci(M,p)/Gis a

subsemigroup of᏶i(M,p)/G.

Leth=f|(Ci(M,P)/G). SinceCi(M,p)/Gis a semigroup,his a homeomorphism

and also it is one-one. To show thath is an onto map, we suppose thatϕ∈C(N). Hence,ϕ∈᏶(N) and, consequently, there existsψ∈i(M,p)/G. Sinceϕ∈C(N),

ϕ∗is trivial and hence for allx∈M,ψ(G,x)=ψ(x), and thereforeψ∈Ci(M,p)/G.

Theorem2.2. LetNbe a compact orientable 2-manifold and consider the universal covering space(R2,P)ofN. LetϕC(N)andψC

i(R2,p). Then for allx,y∈R2,

d(ψ(x),ψ(y))≤, whereis the radius of a fundamental region for the covering space.

Proof. Elkholy [1] proved the truth of the theorem forN=S2. So, we have to prove it for the connected sum ofn-tori. First, letN=T be a torus homomorphic to the quotient space obtained by identifying opposite sides of a square of length “a” as shown in Figure 1(a)

T

a a

b b

(a) (b)

g1·x g2·x g3·x

g4·x α1 α2 α3

α4 y

(3)

Suppose thatϕ:T→T is a convex isometric folding. Thenϕ∗(π1(T ))is trivial. By Theorem 2.1, there exists a convex isometric foldingψ:R2R2such that for allx, y∈R2and for allgG,pψ(x)=pψ(g,x). Equivalently, for all(P,Q)R2and for allg∈Z×Z, there exists a uniqueh∈Z×Zsuch thath◦ψ(P,Q)=ψg(P,Q), i.e.,

ψP,Q+2∆m,2∆n=ψP+2m,Q+2n, wherem,n,m,nZ. (2.1)

Consider any fundamental regionF of the covering space(R2,p)ofT, i.e., a closed square of length “a” with sides identified as shown in Figure 1(b). Sinceϕ∗is trivial, by (2), for allx∈R2,ψ(G,x)=ψ(x). Now, letxandybe distinct points ofR2such thatx=g·yfor allg∈Gand letd(x,y)=α1. Then there exists a pointx∗=g·x such that

dy,x∗=min(α

i), αi=dy,gi,x, i=1,...,4. (2.2)

Thus, there are always four equivalent pointsgi·x, i=1,...,4 which form the

ver-tices of a square of length “a” and such that d(gi·x,y)≤2∆. From Figure 1(b), it

is clear that maxd(x∗,y)and sinceψis an isometric folding, by Robertson [4], d(ψ(x),ψ(y))≤d(x,y), i.e.,

dψ(x),ψy=dψgi·x,ψy≤dgi·x,y=dx,y≤, (2.3)

and this proves the theorem forN=T.

Now, consider the connected sum of two tori, obtained as a quotient space of an octagon with sides identified as shown in Figure 2(a). The group of covering transfor-mationsG is isometric toZ×Z×Z×Z. Using the same previous technique, we can

(a) T#T

(b) g1·x g2·x g3·x

g4·x

y a1 a2 a3

a4

Figure2.

(4)

Theorem2.3. LetNbe a compact nonorientable 2-manifold and consider the uni-versal covering space (M,p) of N. Let φ C(N)and ψ ∈Ci(M,p). Then for all

x,y∈M,dψ(x),ψ(y)≤, whereis the radius of a fundamental region for the covering space.

Proof. By Elkholy [2], the theorem is true forN=p2andM=S2. Now, consider the connected sum of two projective planes, the Klein bottleK, homeomorphic to the quotient space obtained by identifying the opposite sides of a square as shown in Figure 3(a).

b b

a

a

(a) K

(b)

g1·x

g2·x g3·x g4·x

y

Figure3.

Suppose thatϕ:K→K is a convex isometric folding. Then there exists a convex isometric foldingψ:R2R2such that for allxR2andgG,p(ψ(x))=p(ψ(g· x)). Equivalently, for all(P,Q)∈R2 and for all gZ×Z2, there exists a unique h∈Z×Z2such thath◦ψ(P,Q)=ψ(g(P,Q)), i.e.,

ψP,Q+2∆m,2n

=ψP+2∆m,2∆n+(−)mQ, wherem,n,m,nZ. (2.4)

Any fundamental regionF of the covering space(R2,p)ofKis a closed square of diameter 2∆with the boundary identified as shown in Figure 3(b). Sinceϕ∗is trivial, for allx∈R2,ψ(G·x)=ψ(x).

Now, letxandy be distinct points ofR2such thatyg·xfor allgG, and let d(x,y)=α1. Thus, there exists a pointx∗=g·xsuch that

dy,x∗=min(α

i), αi=dy,gi·x, i=1,...,4. (2.5)

Thus, there are always four equivalent pointsgi·xwhich form the vertices of a

par-allelogram such that the shortest diameter is of length less than 2∆.

Now, the pointyis either inside or on the boundary of a triangle of verticesg1·x=

x,g2·x,g3·x. Letybe a point equidistant from the vertices of this triangle, i.e.,

[image:4.516.114.390.200.360.2]
(5)

From Figure 3(b), it is clear thatd(y,x) <and, hence,d(x,y) <. Therefore,

dψ(x),ψy=dψgi·x,ψy≤dg·xi,y=dx∗,y<∆ (2.7)

and the result follows.

Now, letNbe the connected sum of three projective planes obtained as the quotient space of a hexagon with the sides identified in pairs as indicated in Figure 4(a). In this case,(R2,p)is the universal cover ofNandGZ×Z×Z2. Using the same method as that used above, we can always have equivalent pointsgi·x,i=1,...,4 which form

the vertices of a parallelogram whose shortest diameter is of length less than 2∆. From Figure 4(b), we can see that maxd(y,x∗) <and the theorem is proved.

In general and by using the same technique, the theorem is also true for the con-nected sum ofn-projective planes.

P#P#P

(a)

g1·x

g2·x g3·x g4·x

y

(b) Figure4.

3. Volume and convex folding. The following theorem succeeds in estimating the maximum volume we may have if we convexly folded a compact 2-manifold into itself.

Theorem3.1. The infimum of the ratio

eN=Volϕ(N)VolN , (3.1)

whereNis a compact 2-manifold over all convex isometric foldingsϕ∈C(N)of degree zero, is4.

Proof. Robertson [4] has shown that ifNis a compact 2-manifold, andϕ:N→N is a convex isometric folding, any convex isometric folding is an isometric folding, then degϕis±1 or 0. We consider only the case for which degϕis zero otherwise ϕ(N)cannot be embedded as a convex subset ofR2unlessNis. In this case, the set of singularities ofϕdecomposesNinto an even number of strata, sayk, each of which is homeomorphic toϕ(N)and, hence,

[image:5.516.118.382.250.416.2]
(6)

that is,eNshould be an even number. To calculate the exact value ofeN, consider first

an orientable 2-compact manifoldN. By using (1.1)

eN=Volϕ(F)VolF (3.3)

and this means thateN can be calculated by calculating the volume ofF and of its

imageϕ(F), butF is a closed square of diameter 2∆andϕ(F)is a closed subset of F such that the distanced(x,x)between any two pointsx,xϕ(F)is at most. The supremum of 2-dimensional volume of such set isφ(/2)2and, hence, 2< e

N.

ButeN is an even number. Hence,eN=4.

Now, let N be a nonorientable 2-compact manifold, i.e., a connected sum of n-projective planes. Elkholy [2] proved the theorem forn=1.

The fundamental region in this case is a square or a rectangle of diameter 2∆ ac-cording to whethernis even or odd. Ifnis an even number, then

VolF=2∆2 (3.4)

and the result follows. Now, letnbe an odd number. ThenFis a rectangle of lengths ((n+1)/2)a,((n−1)/2)aand hence

VolF=4∆2sinθcosθ=42 a(n+1)/2 a(n2+1)/2

a(n−1)/2 a(n2+1)/2=

n21

n2+12∆2. (3.5) Therefore,eN>2 for alln >1. SinceeN is an even number,eN=4.

References

[1] E. M. Elkholy,Isometric and topological folding of manifolds, Ph.D. thesis, Southampton University, England, 1982.

[2] , Maximum isometric folding of the real projective plane, J. Natur. Sci. Math. 25 (1985), no. 1, 25–30. MR 87d:53081. Zbl 589.53052.

[3] E. M. Elkholy and A. E. Al-Ahmady,Maximum volume of isometric foldings of compact2 -Riemannian manifolds, Proc. Conf. Oper. Res. and Math. Methods Bull. Fac. Sc. Alex. 26 A(1977), no. 1, 54–66.

[4] S. A. Robertson,Isometric folding of Riemannian manifolds, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A79(1977), no. 3–4, 275–284. MR 58 7486. Zbl 418.53016.

[5] S. A. Robertson and E. M. Elkholy,Invariant and equivariant isometric folding, Delta J. Sci. 8(1984), no. 2, 374–385.

Figure

Figure 3isometric foldingSuppose that ϕ ψ : K : R →2  K→ is a convex isometric folding
Figure 43. Volume and convex folding.. The following theorem succeeds in estimating the

References

Related documents

State True or False: 1.The Organizational Sciences approach to human resources management has brought the focus to the scientific process within organizations that can impact

In  social  interactions  between  humans,  two  types  of  communication – verbal and non‐verbal – are utilized to  deliver  information,  emotion  and  intention 

• Where a potential candidate has a spouse, child or parent already serving as a member of a particular board or commission, the mayor shall consider whether it is appropriate

But he also assumed, unlike Cournot, that the two firms act differently; one of the duopolists acts as a follower (as in Cournot’s model), taking the other firm’s output as given

Consumada la Independencia varios aspectos fueron propuestos y discutidos para ser implementados en los nacientes países. Dos de ellos son de nuestro interés: la inmigración

Nonprofit-business hybridity has a positive effect on organizational legitimacy as perceived by external stakeholders (customers, governmental actor and umbrella

This project investigates depictions of Gauri Puja, an offering of gratitude to the goddess Gauri (Parvati) in kohbar ghar (marriage house) wedding murals designed and executed