Technical Integrity Management Programme (TIMP)

From TIMP to TIMP KPI December 12, 2011

Ingbjørn Refsdal

Technical Integrity Management

Programme (TIMP)

• Technical Integrity Management programme

• The challenge

• Building and developing the program

• Implementing TIMP

• The TIMP model

• Key learnings

• Verifications – TTS and OTS

• Technical Integrity indicator – TIMP KPI

From TIMP to TIMP KPI

The challenge

Managing technical integrity ensures predictable and sustainable operations • Industry challenges:

− operate in various environments with different regulatory regimes and operating conditions

− lack of a uniform approach to asset integrity management − sharing of information

“It is particularly crucial to distinguish between process safety

and occupational safety”.

Building and developing the program

• Define project − mandate − scope − resources − steering committee − project risks Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Referansegruppe , TNE PRT HSET , PRT GPT TIKA , TNE PRT RT TIKAL

, EPN ONS GRA INST

, EPN ODV TMB

, ONO ASG OPS

, EPN ODV TMST Styringskomité , EPN ODV , CSO CHSE , EPN OWE , TNE PRT

, M&M MAN HSEQ

, NG PT , TNE POMM Programleder , EPN ODV TIMP IT Tool TNE PRT POMM Anleggsansvarlig (AI leder) Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig (AI leder) Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig (AI leder) Implementeringsteam , Leder , DNV , arbeidsprosess , kompetanse og opplæring , risikovurdering , TNE PRT POMM , ONS TRO OPS

Implementerings-ansvarlig UPN Bergen

,

EPN ODV TMB

Implementerings-ansvarlig UPN Nord

, EPN ODV TMST

Implementerings-ansvarlig UPN Stav.

, EPN ODV TMN Implementerings-ansvarlig M&M MAN OMS PL Implementerings-ansvarlig NG , NG PT OMS Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Leder Teknisk Integritet Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Leder Teknisk Integritet Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator

Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Referansegruppe , TNE PRT HSET , PRT GPT TIKA , TNE PRT RT TIKAL

, EPN ONS GRA INST

, EPN ODV TMB

, ONO ASG OPS

, EPN ODV TMST Styringskomité , EPN ODV , CSO CHSE , EPN OWE , TNE PRT

, M&M MAN HSEQ

, NG PT , TNE POMM Programleder , EPN ODV TIMP IT Tool TNE PRT POMM Anleggsansvarlig (AI leder) Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig (AI leder) Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig (AI leder) Implementeringsteam , Leder , DNV , arbeidsprosess , kompetanse og opplæring , risikovurdering , TNE PRT POMM , ONS TRO OPS

Implementerings-ansvarlig UPN Bergen

,

EPN ODV TMB

Implementerings-ansvarlig UPN Nord

, EPN ODV TMST

Implementerings-ansvarlig UPN Stav.

, EPN ODV TMN Implementerings-ansvarlig M&M MAN OMS PL Implementerings-ansvarlig NG , NG PT OMS Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Leder Teknisk Integritet Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Anleggsansvarlig Leder Teknisk Integritet Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator

Learning from others

• Airport express train (Flytoget) • Avinor (airport operator)

• ConocoPhillips Norway • Det Norske Veritas • ExxonMobil

• Incident investigation reports • Kuwait Petroleum Corporation • McKinsey North Sea Roundtable • Petrobras

• Shell Exploration & Production • TATA Steel

F E D C B F E D C B Work process Competence

Technical Integrity Management Portal Assessment methodology

Implementing the program

• Comprehensive preparations • Ambitious plan

• Correlated with operating activities • Support

• Dedicated core team

• Local champions / owners

34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KVG Gullfaks Kristin Kårstø incl Draupner Troll Tjeldbergodden Sleipner Oseberg Kollsnes Heidrun Norne Snorre Åsgard Marginalfelt Njord

Mongstad incl Sture

Hammerfest LNG

Statfjord

Kalundborg

NG rørledningsdrift

Course Kick off and evaluation Evaluation subsequent installations Installation

Knowledge exchange Discipline competence Operational competence SAMS STID QRA SYNERGI DISP SAP Data sources Informations ources Key SAP Maintenance administration system DISP Dispensation system SYNERGI HSE incident

reporting

QRA Quantitative Risk Assessment STID Technical information SAMS Audit management and reporting system

A portal visualises the status of technical barriers Overall technical integrity of the plant is assessed and documented

Technical condition is assessed on equipment, system and

barrier level

Information through indicators form the basis for technical assessment Expert judgement Availability of safety equipment Backlog safety critical maintenance Etc. Temporary dispensations Backlog consequence classification

System n Barrier 1 Barrier n System 1

Technical Integrity Management Portal

F E D C B F E D C B

Value creation

Work process Competence

Technical Integrity Management Portal Assessment methodology

• Standardised approach for following up technical integrity

• Clarified roles and responsibilities

• Information through indicators form the basis for technical assessment • Discipline evaluations transformed to

basis for management decisions • Improved competence on risk and

barriers

• More than 1600 key personnel trained

• Reduced workload through simplification (automated data collection)

• Holistic overview of technical integrity as basis for prioritisation of risk

reducing measures

Key learnings

Preparation

• Clear objective

• Focus on value creation • Early senior management

buy-in and ownership • Learning from others

Development

• Dedicated core team • Regular updating of

strategy towards target • Simultaneous development

of all TIMP elements

Implementation

• Strong focus on building competence

• Designated support

function during roll-out and implementation

15 - Classification: Internal 2011-07-20 15 - TIMP TTS OTS Technical Integrity Management Program Technical Safety Condition Operational Safety Condition • Equipment • System • Performance Standard • Plant dashboard • Functionality • Integrity • Survivability • Maintenance • Competence • Procedures

• Roles & responsibilities • Management, etc.

Verification and continuous monitoring

Verification Continuous monitoring

16 -

Classification: Internal 2011-07-20

16 -

Overview of the TTS/OTS structure

TTS

Each barrier is divided into Performance Requirements

Each Performance Requirement consist of checklists

TTS verify 23 defined Technical Performance Standards OTS verify 7 defined Operational Performance Standards

On the basis of the checklist each Performance

Requirement is given a scoring on a scale from A - F

The checklists are evaluated through activities such as: • Document review

• Analyse data

• Interview / Questionnaire • Inspection / testing • Observation

Gaps marked as findings!

OTS

Technical integrity KPI

17

Basis: Technical integrity for safety barriers – manually quality assured evaluations

Evaluation scores converted to numbers

Weighting of barriers importance based on expert judgement

Calculation of plant specific TI indicator

TI indicator with status and trend

Technical integrity KPI –

Alt 2

18 Barrier score • Manual evaluation • Score converted to predefined numbers Weighting and calculation • Pre defined barrier weighting • KPI calculation TI indicator • Plant specific • Trend and status

Application

19

Cons

• May camouflage important issues through aggregation

• May turn focus to the indicator itself rather than underlying issues and improvement actions

• May give better grade than without KPI to appear good (or worse grade to get more resources)

TI indicator - Pros and cons

20

Pros

• Provides incentives for continuous improvement

• Highlights the «best in class» -> experience transfer and learning • Provides decision support for