• No results found

Program Outcome #1: articulate assumptions and reasoning associated with the application of existing rules to a given problem.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Program Outcome #1: articulate assumptions and reasoning associated with the application of existing rules to a given problem."

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Standard #4

a. Program Outcomes for the Accounting Program Students will be able to ……

Program Outcome #1: …articulate assumptions and reasoning associated with the application of existing rules to a given problem. (Using resources)

Program Outcome #2: …understand and consider the pros/cons of alternative contents and formats in preparing reports. (Reporting)

Program Outcome #3: …understand the importance of moral courage and ethics as they pertain to accounting. (Ethics and life-long learning)

Program Outcome #4: …learn to give and accept suggestions and guidance when working in teams. (Teamwork)

Program Outcome #5: …link data, knowledge, and insights together in the decision making process. (Decision making and problem solving)

(2)

Performance Results

Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)

Performance Indicator Definition

Student Learning Results For Program Outcome #1

In ACCT 210 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group project using the FASB Codification.

In ACCT 311 and ACCT 418, respectfully, achieve a class avg. > 75% on a series of written assignments related to ethics issues

Define Measure

Results

Analyze Improve Control

In ACCT 210 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group project using the FASB Codification. In ACCT 311 and ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on a series of written assignments related to ethics issues. Scores on a three week group project just after the midterm. It is a Direct, Internal, and Formative measure. This was the initial data to establish a baseline. Scores on a series of written assignments throughout the course of the semester on ethics issues. It is a direct, internal, formative measure.

Avg. for Spring 2013 was 80%. Spring 2013 in ACCT 311 avg. was 88% and ACCT 418 avg. was 79% Students seemed to respond well to the project, but were not thrilled with the FASB database interface.

Students usually get most of the major issues, but tend to be a bit idealistic at times. In the future more short intro problems will be introduced earlier in the semester to get students ready for the database use. Intend to spend more time discussing the cases and continually update them as new issues arise. 80%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  210  

Baseline  Data  Spring  2013  

88%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  311  

(3)

establish a baseline. 79%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  418   Baseline  Data  Spring  2013  

(4)

Performance Results

Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)

Performance Indicator Definition

Student Learning Results For Program Outcome #2

In ACCT 311 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group financial statement analysis project comparing a company using US GAAP to a company using IFRS.

Define Measure

Results

Analyze Improve Control

In ACCT 311 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group financial statement analysis project comparing a company using US GAAP to a company using IFRS. Scores on a semester long group project. It is a Direct, Internal, and Formative measure. This was the initial use to establish a baseline.

Avg. for Spring 2013 was 84%.

Students seemed to respond well to the project, but had a bit of trouble selecting companies that use IFRS for financial reporting In the future we will continue to integrate IFRS coverage alongside GAAP coverage throughout the semester. We will also have at least bi-weekly updates on the group progress. . 84%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  311   Baseline  Data  Spring  

(5)

Performance Results

Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)

Performance Indicator Definition

Student Learning Results For Program Outcome #3

In ACCT 311 and ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on a series of written assignments related to ethics issues.

Define Measure Analyze Results Improve Control In ACCT 311 and ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on a series of written assignments related to ethics issues. Scores on a series of written assignments throughout the course of the semester on ethics issues. Assessments are Direct, Internal, and Formative measures. This was the initial data to establish a baseline. Spring 2013 in ACCT 311 averaged percentage score on written assignment was 88%. The averaged percentage assignment score for ACCT 418 average. was 79%. Students usually get most of the major issues, but tend to be a bit idealistic at times.

Intend to spend more time discussing the cases and continually update them as new issues arise.

88%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  311   Baseline  Data  Spring  2013  

79%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  418   Baseline  Data  Spring  2013  

(6)

Performance Results

Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)

Performance Indicator Definition

Student Learning Results For Program Outcome #4

In ACCT 311 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group financial statement analysis project comparing a company using US GAAP to a company using IFRS.

In ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group forensic audit project. Define Measure

Results

Analyze Improve Control In ACCT 311

achieve a class avg. > 75% on group financial statement analysis project comparing a company using US GAAP to a company using IFRS. In ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group forensic audit project. Scores on a semester long group project. It is a Direct, Internal, and Formative measure. This was the initial data to establish a baseline. Scores on a three week group project just after the midterm. It is a direct, internal, formative measure. This was the initial data to establish a baseline.. Average for group financial assignment for Spring 2013 was 84%. Average for group forensic audit assignment for Spring 2013 was 81%. Students seemed to respond well to the project, but had a bit of trouble selecting companies that use IFRS for financial reporting Students seemed to respond well to the project, but had a bit of trouble getting started. Despite repeated warnings as to the amount of work involved. In the future we will continue to integrate IFRS coverage alongside GAAP coverage throughout the semester. We will also have at least bi-weekly updates on the group progress. In the future it would be interesting to incorporate the theater department into the roles involved in the case to make it truly interactive. We may also include daily progress logs.

84%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  311   Baseline  Data  Spring  2013  

81%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  418   Baseline  Data  Spring  2013  

(7)

Performance Results

Student Learning Results (Required for each accredited program, doctorate, masters, and baccalaureate)

Performance Indicator Definition

Student Learning Results For Program Outcome #5

In ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group forensic audit project.

Define Measure Analyze Results Improve Control In ACCT 418 achieve a class avg. > 75% on group forensic audit project. Scores on a three week group project just after the midterm. It is a Direct, Internal, and Formative measure. This was the initial data to establish a baseline.

Avg. for Spring 2013 was 81%.

Students seemed to respond well to the project, but had a bit of trouble getting started, despite repeated warnings as to the amount of work involved.

In the future it would be interesting to incorporate the theater department into the roles involved in the case to make it truly interactive. We may also include daily progress logs. . 81%   0%   20%   40%   60%   80%   100%   ACCT  418   Baseline  Data  Spring  

References

Related documents