• No results found

Shared Print Management of Library Collections: Resource, Outsource, or Cloud-Source?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Shared Print Management of Library Collections: Resource, Outsource, or Cloud-Source?"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Lizanne Payne

Print Archives Consultant WEST Project Manager lizannepayne03@gmail.com

Shared Print Management

of Library Collections:

(2)

Le problème, c’est tres grand

~ 1 BILLION volumes

~ 70 million volumes dans les entrepôts de stockage

~ 25 million

volumes ajoutés annuellement Plus de 980 million volumes

dans les bibliotheques academiques en Amerique du Nord

NCES ALS + ARL statistics 2008 2

(3)

Il n’y a pas de bon choix

Ne pas

acheter plus bibliothèque Élargir la

Déselection Entrepstockageôts de

Plus d’espace Moins d’espace

Plus réalisable

Moins réalisable

(4)

80+ entrepôts de stockage, la plupart construite depuis 1995 Entrepôt de stockage à haute densité: Construit pour

conservation à long terme une grande quantité de livres et documents

L’augmentation d’entrepôts de stockage

4 Plus de 50% de toutes les bibliothèques d’ARL emploient les entrepôts de stockage

(5)

La migration permanente de rayonnage ouvert

University of Chicago (ASRS sous terre, 2011)

 Capacité de 3.5 million volumes (presque 50% de la

collection)

San Francisco State University (ASRS, 2012)

 250,000 volumes seulement sera de retour au rayonnage

ouvert (20%), selon 1 million restera en ASRS (80%) University of Denver

 Déplacé toute la collection á l’entrepôt de stockage en

été 2011 pendant le remodelage

 Il faut determiner combien sera de retour au rayonnage

(6)

Deselection est un choix plus en plus important

Mass

Weeding

High

Density

Shelving

6

(7)

Projets majeurs désélection

UC San Diego

 Removing 150,000 volumes (4% of collection) after

state budget cuts closed four campus libraries

 McGill University, described at this conference

Sustainable Collections Services, Inc.

 12 major deselection projects completed or underway

in 2011

 Libraries from small (200,000 volumes) to large 2

million)

(8)

Les collections partagéés: un choix nouveau

8

• Permanent

withdrawal

Mass

Deselection

• Remove from open

stacks

High Density

Shelving

• Coordinate holdings

with others

Shared Print

Collections

(9)

Collections partagéés en Amerique du Nord

9 Shared Storage Copy UC RLFs OhioLINK PASCAL WRLC Minnesota MLAC Tri-Universities Group (TUG) Library-Nominated Titles ASERL Journal Retention TRLN Single Copy Archive OCUL Thunder Bay Agreement By Publisher

CIC Shared Print Repository Orbis-Cascade Alliance PALCI Five Colleges (MA) COPPUL By Domain ASERL Collab Fed Depository Program CRL Agriculture and Law IMLS

project By Custom Analysis Western Regional Storage Trust (WEST) Maine Shared Collections (TBD) Partial list

(10)

Les caractéristiques communes de la

plupart des collections partagéés

 Journals

 Selection: by publisher, especially based on availability

of digital versions

 Retention: specified term, often 25 years

 Ownership: original owning library

 Access/delivery: “light archives” available via ILL

 Business model: libraries absorb own costs

(11)

Western Regional Storage Trust (WEST) (103 libraries) ASERL (40 libraries) CIC (13 libraries)

Les grandes collections partagéés régionales

aux États-Unis

11

More than 50% of all ARL libraries participate in one of these

(12)

Principales caractéristiques de WEST,

CIC, et ASERL

12

WEST CIC-SPR ASERL

Members 103 10+ 40

Archive facilities Libraries and

storage facilities Indiana U. storage facility Libraries and storage facilities Selection By risk profile STM from Elsevier,

Springer, Wiley Library-nominated Ownership Archive Holder Original Owner Original Owner Retention 25 years (to 2035) 25 years (to 2035) 25 years (to 2035) Access Digital preferred;

physical in-library only

[TBD] At owning library’s discretion

Business Model Share upfront

costs of ingest Share upfront costs of ingest AND ongoing retention

No cost sharing, libraries absorb own costs

(13)

Les monographies sont la prochaine frontiere

 ReCAP consortium (New York Public Library, Columbia,

Princeton) planning for shared collection including monographs, currently in shared storage facility

 Maine Shared Collections program being defined

 Hathi Trust endorsed “distributed print archive of

monograph holdings corresponding to [digital] volumes”

(14)

Hathi Trust va changer le jeu

 Working Assumptions:

 Distributed archive based on holdings of Hathi members  Compensation or partial subsidy for libraries that retain  Available to Hathi members (i.e. light archive)

(15)

La duplication entre la collection Hathi et les

bibliotheques

15

Hathi Digitized

Titles

~5.1 million

75% of Hathi titles also stored at LC, UC, CRL facilities

Library

Collection

Hathi estimates 45 - 50% of typical academic library

collection matches Hathi titles

Analysis courtesy OCLC Research “Cloud Library Project” http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-01.pdf

(16)

Partager les monographies a besoin

d'une approche différente

 Copyright issues

 Only ~27% of Hathi titles in public domain

 Delivery issues

 Searchers more likely to want full print version

 Keep more copies available? Print on demand?

 Space reclamation issues

 How to make monograph deselection cost-effective?

 Preserve the unique rather than consolidate the common

(17)

Partager l’information de collections partagéés

Library Collections Shared Print Digital Volumes

1. Disclose holdings that have been committed to shared print

collections

2. Develop community standards and agreements to preserve print

(18)

Divulguer des collections partagéés

18 Print Archives Preservation Registry (PAPR)

WorldCat

CRL OCLC Archived Holdings Holdings for analysis Library Catalogs

Archived Titles and Holdings PAPR Directory of Print Archive Programs PAPR Archiving

Proposals Deselection Reports Consortial

Criteria Archived Holdings

(19)

Forum communautaire de collections partagéés

 Shared Print discussion group Fridays at ALA

(informal but longstanding)

 Print Archives Network (PAN) listserv hosted by CRL

 Msg to listserv@listserv.crl.edu

 Subscribe PAN “Your Name”

 CRL‘s new Global Resources Forum offers community

discussions by web meeting.

 Jan 10: Dark archives, light archives, and optimal

copies

(20)

Laissez-nous créer le filet de protection WEST ASERL CIC COPPUL OCUL

(21)

MERCI BIEN

Lizanne Payne

References

Related documents

If the mem- ory card is not correctly inserted or no mem- ory card is inserted, a will appear in the LCD monitor and internal memory will be used for recording and

The main effects of market integration on agricultural production are seen as changes in agricultural output and input prices. These consequently affect the

These representatives work independently but sometimes in cooperation with Iran’s embas- sies (who come under the control of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs), and head up

We use a standard ultimatum game, but in one treatment Indian subjects made offers to French subjects (ItoF treatment) and, in another treatment, French

When Barger, shortly after launching Robot Wisdom Weblog in December 1997, first discovered Gulker’s NewsPage Network in early January 1998, he returned from his exploration of

The impetus behind the work came from a desire to acknowledge that power is part of all relationships and as the practice of counselling psychology is based

In fact, if we restrict the comparison to the days in which we have observations in all the data sources simultaneously (both trades and quotes), we find that for European firms

The IL putative taxon does not show marked variation in trichome morphology between leaf and bracteole (or calyx lobe) surfaces, except for variation in the ornamentation pattern