Towards bigger buildings
Estonian Wood Day
8
th
November 2012
Why bigger buildings?
Customer opinion
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Vähintään tyytyväisiä
Satisfaction rate %
FWR/TTY survey 2011:
•
6 buildings from 1996 – 2003
•
Flats 157 (24 % of all)
•
118 answers (75 %)
•
Owners 58%
•
Rentals 42%
-100000 -80000 -60000 -40000 -20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 10 0 Flerbostadshus Småhus
De flesta barn i Sverige föds
till småhusboende….
…vi lever som familj i ett
småhus…
…vi flyttar till
flerbostadshus som första
egna hem….
…vi rör oss så småningom
mot flerbostadshuset när
barnen flugit ut…..
Här finns nu en växande industribyggsektor som siktat in sig på den
bostadsmarknad som kommer att växa i framtiden….
Population breakdown by age in relation
with Housing
Vi minskar våra “ansvarsår”……
Personer födda mellan 1945 och 1954 tänker i första hand
förverkliga sig själva……… (
Källa: Kairos Future
)
ålder
20
40
60
80
År 1920
År 1960
År 2000
År 2040
70
50
30
Barndom
Befrielsetid
Frihetstid
Ansvarsår
Ålderdom
Block of flats are needed more because...
Vi skapar oss mer “frihetstid”……
Åren i livsfaser där man i hög grad lever singel och i
flerfamiljshus ökar………
ålder
20
40
60
80
År 1920
År 1960
År 2000
År 2040
70
50
30
Livstid och livsstil där boende i flerfamiljshus dominerar
Barndom
Befrielsetid
Frihetstid
Ansvarsår
Ålderdom
The population group, which typically
lives in block of flats, is growing.
7
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Puun osuus
runkorakenteissa %
Puun osuus
ulkoverhouksissa %
Markkinoiden
kokonaisvolyymi
(1000 m3)
The biggest potential is where
decisions are made professionally and
where the buildings are big
Source: Tilastokeskus, Rakentamisen tilastot. VTT
Market share of
wood in frames %
Market share of
wood in facades %
Total potential
(1000m3)
Wood construction serves the raw material
supply of the whole forest industry
Wood constructions’ impact on national
economy
What will happen to our economy, if we increase use of wood in construction
12.11.2012 Lähde: PTT, Puurakentamisen yhteiskunnalliset vaikutukset
-1,5 % -1,0 % -0,5 % 0,0 % 0,5 % 1,0 % 1,5 % Välituotteiden tuotanto Suomessa Välituotteiden tuonti Palkansaaja-korvaukset Toiminta-ylijäämä,
netto Arvonlisäys Tuotos Työpanos
1 Internationally relevant reference buildings
2 Most advanced
building
regulations
3 Top competence
and know how
4 Proprietary
solutions for new
construction and
renovations
2009
Internationally competitive
wood construction industry
Demand according the town plans (m
2
)
= about 7700 flats until 2015
New fire codes give significant new potential!
12.11.2012
1
2
3
4
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
1997
B
-s2
,
d
0
D
-s2
,
d
0
• P2 fire class maximum 8 storeys
• Sprinkler system is required
• K
2
10 or K
2
30 fire protected structures
• A-class insulation materials
• Special requirements for eaves, wooden
facades (flame traps), emergengy exits,
balconies
2011
Town houses up to 4 floors
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen1997
B
-s2
,
d
0
D
-s2
,
d
0
• P2 fire class maximum 4 storeys
• Fire protections of the structures K
2
30
• A-class insulation materials
• No sprinkler system requirement
Max. 4 storey concrete frame
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
1997
2011
• D-s2, d0 (wood) facades up to 4 floors
• Ground floor minimum B-s2, d0 (fire protected wood) .
• B-s2, d0 (fire retardant treated wood) facades up to 8 floors
• No sprinkler system requirement
B
-s2
,
d
0
D
-s2
,
d
0
Max. 7 storey concrete frame
12.11.2012
1997
Mikko Viljakainen2011
•
D-s2, d0 class (wood) extra floor
•
B-s2, d0 (fire retardant treated wood)
facades up to 8 floors
•
No sprinkler system requirement
B
-s2
,
d
0
D
-s2
,
d
0
12.11.2012 Titta Vuori, Modelark
Competence and
know how on
New industrial construction methods
Hybrid technology
CLT (Cross Laminated Timber )
Post and beam technology
Volume elements
Renovation of old blocks of flats is
significant potential
Case example of new fire codes –
present situation
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
Weaknesses
•Weak technical condition and
energy performance
•No elevator
•Small flats have no balconies
•Dark ground floor with no
windows
•No ventilation of it is very weak
•Considered ugly, bad image of
the areas
Potential
•Good location with well
established infrastructure and
services
•Typical low density of milieu
allows additional building
volumes
•Bulky flats and rooms
•Durable and well performing
skeleton of the building
Potential of wood
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
•Better energy performance
and surface for the building
with
low CO
2
emissions
•New visual appearance and
shape of the building –
new
image
•Extra floor(s) and new roof
shape – income to finance
elevator and other renovation
works
•New balconies
•Hi-level prefabrication and
industrially controlled quality
of t he components.
•Very
fast assembly
to reduce
the harm for residents.
•Visual wood is favoured
material.
•Cost competitive.
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
AFTER
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
AFTER
Cost competitiveness – Exterior walls
Source ISS Proko Oy, Index (Haahtela) 1/2011 HELSINKI KL79
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Wood facade
and frame
Brick cladding
Ceramic tiles
Thin Steel
plates with
steel frame
Plastering
175mm
insulation
€/m2
Demolition works and design costa are not included. All structures ful fill the same energy perfomance
criteria (2010/2012) Includes VAT 23 %
Cost competitiveness – Extra floor
Source ISS Proko Oy, Index (Haahtela) 1/2011 HELSINKI KL79
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
Wood facade
and frame
Volumetric
wooden
element
Thin Steel
plates with
steel frame
Conventional
concrate
frame
Ceramic tiles Brick cladding
€/m2
CO
2
Emissions
of the construction works
and
CO
2
storage
(kg/m2)
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Brick wall
with mineral
wood
Wood wall
with wood
fibre
insulation
Wood wall
with mineral
wool
insulation
Steel wall
with mineral
wool
CO2 storage
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen
Present
Plan
Oulu
Projects
Porvoo
Arkkit. yo. Tiina Hotakainen
Plan
Present
Present
Plan
Tampere
Present
Present
Riihimäki
Arkkit. Yo. Tomi Tulamo
12.11.2012 Mikko Viljakainen