Cocaine Alcohol
Awareness Program Correctional Alternatives Corrections Management GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 16 16 15 Debbie Duke 16 14 16
AVERAGE: 16 AVERAGE: 15 AVERAGE: 15.5 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 18 18 12.2
Debbie Duke 18 12.6 18
AVERAGE: 18 AVERAGE: 15.3 AVERAGE: 15.1 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 12.8 14 13.2
Debbie Duke 14.8 14.8 14.6
AVERAGE: 13.8 AVERAGE: 14.4 AVERAGE: 13.9
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 14.2 14.6 14.6
Debbie Duke 15 14.6 9.8
AVERAGE: 14.6 AVERAGE: 14.6 AVERAGE: 12.2
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 7 17 6.8 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 13.8 SCORE: 14 SCORE: 12
TOTAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE: (maximum: 100)
83.2 90.3 75.5
Decatur (24th Judicial District)
Davidson County (Metropolitan Govt. of
Nashville and ) East Tennessee HRA GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 14 15 16 Debbie Duke 16 17 17
AVERAGE: 15 AVERAGE: 16 AVERAGE: 16.5 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 14.6 18 17.8
Debbie Duke 18 17.8 18
AVERAGE: 16.3 AVERAGE: 17.9 AVERAGE: 17.9 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 13 13.8 13.4
Debbie Duke 14.6 14.8 14.8
AVERAGE: 13.8 AVERAGE: 14.3 AVERAGE: 14.1
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 12 14.6 11.2
Debbie Duke 12.4 15 12.4
AVERAGE: 12.2 AVERAGE: 14.8 AVERAGE: 11.8
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 3.4 11 15.6 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 13.8 SCORE: 11.4 SCORE: 14.4
TOTAL PROPOSAL
First Tennessee HRA Hamilton County Hay House GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 16 16 15 Debbie Duke 16 16 15 Kay Ulmer 16
AVERAGE: 16 AVERAGE: 16 AVERAGE: 15.33 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 12.4 14.6 13
Debbie Duke 18 14 16.6
Kay Ulmer 18
AVERAGE: 15.2 AVERAGE: 14.3 AVERAGE: 15.86 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 12 11.2 11.8
Debbie Duke 14 14.4 12.6
Kay Ulmer 13
AVERAGE: 13 AVERAGE: 12.8 AVERAGE: 12.466
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 9 12.4 14.6
Debbie Duke 14.6 12.4 12.4
Kay Ulmer 15
AVERAGE: 11.8 AVERAGE: 12.4 AVERAGE: 14
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 9.6 6.2 4.2 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 6.2 SCORE: 11.4 SCORE: 9.8
TOTAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE: (maximum: 100)
71.8 73.1 71.66
Hope Center @ Grace Knox County CAAP Madison County GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 17 15 _____ Debbie Duke 16 16 16 Kay Ulmer 16
AVERAGE: 16.5 AVERAGE: 15.5 AVERAGE: 16 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 18 14.6 _____
Debbie Duke 15.8 17 16
Kay Ulmer 15.8
AVERAGE: 16.9 AVERAGE: 15.8 AVERAGE: 15.9 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 14.4 13.6 ____
Debbie Duke 14.6 14.8 14.2
Kay Ulmer 14.2
AVERAGE: 14.5 AVERAGE: 14.2 AVERAGE: 14.2
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 5.2 12.4 ______
Debbie Duke 0 12.4 12.4
Kay Ulmer 15
AVERAGE: 2.6 AVERAGE: 12.4 AVERAGE: 13.7
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 2.8 4 4 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 14.4 SCORE: 13.8 SCORE: 10.4
TOTAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE: (maximum: 100)
Mid-Cumberland HRA
Montgomey/Robertson
County Project WIT
GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 17 17 16 Debbie Duke 16 14 15 Kay Ulmer 16
AVERAGE: 16.5 AVERAGE: 15.5 AVERAGE: 15 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 18 18 16.6
Debbie Duke 18 18 16
Kay Ulmer 15.8
AVERAGE: 18 AVERAGE: 18 AVERAGE: 16.4 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 14.4 14 14
Debbie Duke 14.4 10 13.8
Kay Ulmer 11.2
AVERAGE: 14.4 AVERAGE: 12 AVERAGE: 13
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 12 12.4 14.2
Debbie Duke 15 12.4 12.4
Kay Ulmer 15
AVERAGE: 13.5 AVERAGE: 12.4 AVERAGE: 13.86
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 13.6 12 12.8 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 11 SCORE: 15 SCORE: 12.6
TOTAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE: (maximum: 100)
87 84.9 83.66
Providence Community Corrections Southeast Tennessee Community Corrections (Bradley Co.) Southeast Tennessee HRA GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 15 15 16 Debbie Duke 16 14 16
AVERAGE: 15.5 AVERAGE: 14.5 AVERAGE: 16 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 16 12.2 14.2
Debbie Duke 14.6 18 17.6
AVERAGE: 15.3 AVERAGE: 15.1 AVERAGE: 15.9 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 11.6 12.8 11.8
Debbie Duke 12.2 14.2 10.8
AVERAGE: 11.9 AVERAGE: 13.5 AVERAGE: 11.3
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 6 15 11.6
Debbie Duke 3 12.4 12
AVERAGE: 4.5 AVERAGE: 13.7 AVERAGE: 11.8
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 8 1.4 12.2 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 6.2 SCORE: 6.8 SCORE: 15
TOTAL PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL SCORE SUMMARY MATRIX
South Central HRA Upper Cumberland HRA
Westate Corrections Network GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE (maximum: § 17) Jacquelyn Baker 17 17 16 Debbie Duke 15 15 16
AVERAGE: 16 AVERAGE: 16 AVERAGE: 16 Documentation of Need
(maximum: § 18)
Jacquelyn Baker 16 14.6 18
Debbie Duke 18 17.2 15.6
AVERAGE: 17 AVERAGE: 15.9 AVERAGE: 16.8 TECHNICAL APPROACH
(maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 11.2 13.6 13
Debbie Duke 14 11 13.4
AVERAGE: 12.6 AVERAGE: 12.3 AVERAGE: 13.2
Community Involvement & Support (maximum: § 15)
Jacquelyn Baker 11.6 15 12.4
Debbie Duke 12.4 15 12
AVERAGE: 12 AVERAGE: 15 AVERAGE: 12.2
CognitiveBased Programming and Treatment Services (maximum §20) Rehab Services 13 17.4 17.4 BUDGET PROPOSAL (maximum: § 15)
SCORE: 11 SCORE: 13.4 SCORE: 12.2
TOTAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE: (maximum: 100)