• No results found

Retaining_Wall_Design_Example.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Retaining_Wall_Design_Example.pdf"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

f'c = 3000 psi fy = 60 ksi

Development of Structural Design Equations. In this example, the structural design of the

three retaining wall components is performed by hand. Two equations are developed in this section for determining the thickness & reinforcement required to resist the bending moment in the retaining wall components (stem, toe and heel).

Equation to calculate effective depth, d: Three basic equations will be used to develop an equation for d. 1 1 ' ' 003 . 0 003 . 0 , 003 . 0 / 003 . 0 : ] 2 [ 85 . 0 85 . 0 , ] 1 [ 2 2 β ε ε β φ φ + = + = = = = ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − = ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − = = s s y c s y s c y s u y s n n u d a d a ity compatibil strain Eqn ab f f A f A b a f T C Eqn a d f A M a d f A M M M Assuming β1 = 0.85, εs a/d 0.005 0.319 0.00785 0.235 0.010 0.196

and choosing a value for εs in about the middle of the practical design range,

] 3 [ 235 . 0 , 235 . 0 a d Eqn d a = = Fill: φ = 32o Unit wt = 100 pcf Natural Soil: φ = 32o

allowable bearing pressure = 5000psf wtoe tstem wheel

HT = 18 ft

(2)

Substituting Eqn. 2 into Eqn. 1: ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = 2 85 . 0 ' ab f d a f f M y y c u φ

And substituting Eqn. 3 into the above:

d d d f b d f f M y y c u 883 . 0 2 235 . 0 235 . 0 85 . 0 ' ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − =φ

Inserting the material properties: f'c = 3 ksi and fy = 60 ksi, and b = 12in (1-foot-wide

strip of wall, in the direction out of the paper).

2 2 5.71 ) 883 . 0 )( 235 . 0 )( 12 ( 3 ) 85 . 0 ( 90 . 0 d M d M in k u in ksi u = =

Equation for area of reinforcement, As. The area of reinforcement required is calculated

from Eqn. 1: d A M d A d f A Mus y0.883 =0.90 s60ksi0.883 u =47.7ksi s

Design Procedure (after Phil Ferguson, Univ. Texas)

1. Determine HT. Usually, the top-of-wall elevation is determined by the client. The

bottom-of-wall elevation is determined by foundation conditions. HT = 18 feet.

2. Estimate thickness of base. tf ≈7% to 10% HT (12" minimum)

(3)

horizontal earth pressure. calc. d: lb ft ft ft sur a sur lb ft ft fill o o a ft a fill psf h q k P pcf P k page of out h h k P 2070 ) 1 )( 67 . 16 )( 400 ( 31 . 0 ) 1 ( 4310 ) 1 ( ) 67 . 16 )( 100 )( 31 . 0 ( 2 1 31 . 0 ) 32 sin( 1 ) 32 sin( 1 sin 1 sin 1 ) 1 ( ) ( 2 1 2 = = = = = = + − = + − = = φ φ γ in in in in in stem in in in in stem in in k ft k in k u ft k ft lb ft lb u fill u d t use bars assume t d d ft in d M M h h P M 5 . 12 5 . 0 2 15 15 ) 8 # ( , 3 . 14 ) 0 . 1 ( 2 1 cover 2 8 . 11 8 . 11 , 71 . 5 ) 12 ( 9 . 65 71 . 5 9 . 65 ) 2 67 . 16 )( 2070 )( 6 . 1 ( ) 3 67 . 16 )( 4310 )( 6 . 1 ( ) 2 )( )(P LoadFactor Live ( ) 3 )( )( LoadFactor Pressure Earth ( 2 2 sur = − − = = = + + = = = = = + = + = − −

wtoe tstem wheel

h = 8ft – 16in/12in/ft h =16.67ft

tf = 16in

ka γ h ka qs

(4)

calc. As: in use bar in ft in wall of ft in bar in in bar one of A in A A ft in d A M s s in s ksi ft k s ksi u 6 @ 8 # , 13 . 7 12 33 . 1 79 . 0 79 . 0 8 # 33 . 1 ), 5 . 12 ( 7 . 47 ) 12 ( 9 . 65 7 . 47 2 2 2 2 = = = = = −

4. Choose Heel Width, wheel Select wheel to prevent sliding. Use a key to force sliding

failure to occur in the soil (soil-to-soil has higher friction angle than soil-to-concrete). Neglect soil resistance in front of the

wall. found stem fill T o soil natural soil natural T sliding resist W W W W W F FS F set + + = = = = = = = = 62 . 0 ) 32 tan( tan ) (tan F friction) of fficient Force)(coe (Vertical F sliding for 1.5 Safety of Factor FS resist resist φ φ 850 200 ) 1 )( 3 12 15 )( 12 16 )( 150 ( 2810 ) 1 ( ) 12 1 2 15 12 )( 67 . 16 )( 150 ( 1670 ) 1 )( )( 67 . 16 )( 100 ( + = + + = = + = = = heel ft ft heel found lb ft in ft in in ft stem heel ft heel ft fill w plf ft w ft pcf W pcf W w ft lb w pcf W lb lb lb sliding lb ft ft sur lb ft ft fill sur fill sliding F psf P pcf P P P F 7250 2230 5020 2230 ) 1 )( 18 )( 400 31 . 0 ( 5020 ) 1 ( ) 18 )( 100 31 . 0 ( 2 1 2 = + = = × = = × = + = 18ft tf = 16in 15in 12in

(5)

ft heel ft heel heel lb lb w w usew ft lb 5 . 7 , 42 . 7 , 1870 3660 62 . 0 5 . 1 7250 5 . 1 7250 = = + = = 5. Check Overturning. ) 2 75 . 11 ( ) 2 25 . 1 3 ( 3 ), 3 12 15 2 5 . 7 ( 2 . 50 ) 9 ( 23 . 2 ) 6 ( 02 . 5 ) 2 18 ( ) 3 18 ( ft found ft ft stem ft toe ft ft fill resist ft k ft k ft k over ft sur ft fill over W W w assume ft W M M P P M + + + = + + = = + = + = − OK FS M M M M over ft k ft k over resist ft k resist ft k ft klf ft k ft ft klf resist , 0 . 2 47 . 2 2 . 50 2 . 124 2 . 124 ) 875 . 5 )( 85 . 0 5 . 7 20 . 0 ( ) 625 . 3 )( 81 . 2 ( ) 8 )( 5 . 7 67 . 1 ( = > = = = + × + + × = − − − 6. Check Bearing. ft k ft k ft k ft k found ft ft ft stem ft ft fill over k k k k T found stem fill T T v M W W W M M W W W W W bL M bL W toe of end at − − + = = + − + + − − = = + + = + + = < + = 9 . 29 ) 25 . 2 ( 81 . 2 ) 125 . 2 ( 53 . 12 2 . 50 ) 0 ( ) 875 . 5 2 25 . 1 5 . 7 ( ) 2 5 . 7 875 . 5 ( 69 . 17 35 . 2 81 . 2 45 . 12 6 L e if only valid is equation , 6 2 σ Check that e < L/6: OK L e L W m e k kft ft ft ft T , 6 , 96 . 1 6 75 . 11 6 , 68 . 1 69 . 17 9 . 29 < ∴ = = = = = − 12.53k 2.35k 18ft tf = 16in 12in 3' 15" 7.5'

(6)

OK capacity, bearing allowable 0 . 5 80 . 2 ) 75 . 11 )( 1 ( 6 1 9 . 29 ) 75 . 11 )( 1 ( 69 . 17 2 = < = + = − ksf ksf ft ft ft k ft ft k v σ 7. Heel Design.

Max. load on heel is due to the weight of heel + fill + surcharge as the wall tries to tip over. Flexure: sur fill heel W W W W = + + ft k ft klf u u klf ft ft ft L w M W plf pcf ft pcf W − = = = = + + = 0 . 81 2 ) 5 . 7 ( 88 . 2 2 88 . 2 ) 400 ( 6 . 1 ) 1 )( 67 . 16 )( 100 ( 2 . 1 ) 1 )( 12 16 )( 150 ( 2 . 1 2 2 flexure for d d in k ft in d in k M in ft k u 0 . 13 , 71 . 5 ) 12 ( 0 . 81 71 . 5 2 2 = = = − Shear: controls shear for d d psi V setV d psi d b f V w V in in lb c u in w c c k ft klf ft u u , 9 . 21 , ) 12 ( 3000 2 ) 75 . 0 ( 600 , 21 , ) 12 ( 3000 2 ) 75 . 0 ( 2 ) 75 . 0 ( 6 . 21 ) 5 . 7 ( 88 . 2 ) 5 . 7 ( ' = = = = = = = = φ φ

Shear controls the thickness of the heel.

in heel

in in

in

heel in assume bar uset

t 24.4 ( #8 ), 21.5 2 1 cover 2 9 . 21 + + = = = Reinforcement in heel: " 8 @ 8 # , 83 . 8 ) 12 ( 07 . 1 79 . 0 07 . 1 ), 9 . 21 ( 7 . 47 ) 12 ( 0 . 81 7 . 47 2 2 2 use ft in ft in bar in in A A ft in d A M in s in s ksi ft k s ksi u = = = = − 7.5ft 16in Mu wu Vu

(7)

8. Toe Design.

Earth Pressure at Tip of Toe:

change) neglible b.c. wt foundation recalc not (did , 7 . 32 ) 1 )( 18 )( 4 . 0 ( 6 . 1 ) 35 . 2 81 . 2 53 . 12 ( 2 . 1 ) ( 6 . 1 ) ( 2 . 1 6 1 2 k ft ft ksf k k k u sur found stem fill u u u v W W W W W W bL M bL W = + + + = + + + = ± = σ

[

]

ksf ft ft ksf ksf ksf v ksf ksf ksf v ksf ksf ksf v ft ft ft k ft ft k v ft k ft k ft k ft k u ft stem ft soil over u B C A M W W M M 74 . 3 ) 75 . 8 ( 75 . 11 82 . 0 74 . 4 82 . 0 82 . 0 96 . 1 78 . 2 74 . 4 96 . 1 78 . 2 ) 75 . 11 )( 1 ( 6 1 0 . 45 ) 75 . 11 )( 1 ( 7 . 32 0 . 45 ) 1 ( 81 . 2 ) 125 . 2 ( 53 . 12 2 . 1 ) 2 . 50 ( 6 . 1 ) 0 . 1 125 . 2 ( 2 . 1 6 . 1 2 = − + = = − = = + = + = = + − = × + × − = − − − σ σ σ σ d for flexure: flexure for d d in k ft in d in k M M in ft k u ft k ft ft ft ksf ft ft ft ksf u 5 . 6 , 71 . 5 ) 12 ( 8 . 19 71 . 5 8 . 19 ) 3 3 2 )( 1 )( 3 )( 00 . 1 ( 2 1 ) 2 3 )( 1 )( 3 )( 74 . 3 ( 2 2 = = = = + = − − d for shear:

Assume theel = ttoe = 21.5in

Critical section for shear occurs at "d" from face of stem, d = 21.5" – 3"cover-1/2"=18"

controls flexure for d OK V psi V ft V ft u lb in in c k ft ft ksf ksf u ksf ft ft ksf ksf ksf vcritical tion , , 750 , 17 ) 18 )( 12 ( 3000 2 ) 75 (. 74 . 6 ) 1 )( 12 18 3 )( 24 . 4 74 . 4 ( 2 1 24 . 4 ) 12 18 75 . 8 ( 75 . 11 82 . 0 74 . 4 82 . 0 sec > = = = − + = = + − + = φ σ A B C 3' 1.25' 7.5'

(8)

Reinforcement in toe: " 8 @ 4 # 6 . 8 ) 12 ( 28 . 0 20 . 0 4 # , , 33 ) 12 ( 28 . 0 79 . 0 28 . 0 ), 18 ( 7 . 47 ) 12 ( 8 . 19 7 . 47 2 2 2 2 2 use ft in ft in bar in say bars smaller try ft in ft in bar in in A A ft in d A M in in s in s ksi ft k s ksi u = = = = = −

References

Related documents

Thus, the formation of a fully recrystallized structure at high temperature may be attained by Sc additives [17,18] or localization of plastic deformation that highly

In OF1.0, packet forwarding within an OpenFlow logical switch is controlled by a single flow table that contains a set of flow entries installed by the controller.. The flow

Cumulative estimates with 95% confidence intervals of the percentage of Sustained Virologic Response 12 weeks after discontinuing sofosbuvir and ribavirin (SVR12) in 497

Model and experimental data for (d) mechanical output work, (e) fluid input energy, and (f) efficiency all as a function of contraction for all the muscles at an operating pressure

Next, we investigate the uncoded IEEE 802.11a based OFDM performance for both pure and composite Nakagami fading channels with either 48 or 24 independent sub-carriers in the

The first type of training provided perceptual form-only training to pseudoword (PW) stimuli using a PW-detection task. The second type of training assigned the meaning of

Prereq or concur: Honors standing, and English 1110 or equiv, and course work in History at the 3000 level, or permission of instructor.. Repeatable to a maximum of 6