• No results found

Trick or Treat(ment)? : Impact of Route-level Features on Walk and Bike Decisions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Trick or Treat(ment)? : Impact of Route-level Features on Walk and Bike Decisions"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Portland State University

PDXScholar

TREC Friday Seminar Series Transportation Research and Education Center

(TREC)

10-31-2014

Trick or Treat(ment)? : Impact of Route-level Features on Walk

and Bike Decisions

Joseph Paul Broach

Portland State University, joebroach@gmail.com

Let us know how access to this document benefits you.

Follow this and additional works at:http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/trec_seminar

Part of theTransportation Commons,Urban Studies Commons, and theUrban Studies and Planning Commons

This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in TREC Friday Seminar Series by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contactpdxscholar@pdx.edu.

Recommended Citation

Broach, Joseph Paul, "Trick or Treat(ment)? : Impact of Route-level Features on Walk and Bike Decisions" (2014). TREC Friday

Seminar Series. Book 19.

(2)

Trick or Treat(ment)?

Impact of Route-Level

Features on Walk and

Bike Decisions

(3)
(4)
(5)

A little backstory

2007: BikeGPS study

Over 150 Volunteers with bike-mounted PDAs

2009-2011: Bike Model 1.0

Route choice model

2010-2013: Family Activity Study (FAS)

Over 1,000 adults and children, wearable GPS

2012-2015: Bike Model 2.0, Ped Model 1.0

Route and Mode Choice

(6)

Why a new study?

1.

Replication

2.

Pedestrians

3.

Sample

4.

Network

5.

Mode Choice

(7)

New

data

(8)

Study Participants Multnomah County Families w/ Children Median Annual Household Income $50,000-$75,000 $57, 143 %Female Adults 62.4% 58.7% %Female Children 47.9% 49.0% %Married Couple Families 58.5% 64.6% %White, Non-Hispanic Adults 84.9% 68.7% %Four-year college degree or higher 59.8% 37.5% (age 25+) %Renters 19.2% 37.8%

Vehicles per licensed driver

0.98

-Interested but Concerned Cyclists

(9)

-Bike route choice

1.

“Label” alternatives

2.

Calibrate detours

3.

Terrain (LiDAR)

4.

Traffic

5.

Intersections

6.

Facilities

(10)

off-street path bike boulevard

bike lane (>5k/day) any street (>5k/day)

moderate (10-20k/day) traffic, no bike lane

heavy (20-30k/day) traffic, no bike lane

very heavy (30k/day) traffic, no bike lane

upslope 2-4% upslope 4-6%

upslope 6%+

bridge w/ path

bridge w/ bike lane stop sign

traffic signal turn crossing light (5-10k/day) traffic,

no signal

crossing moderate (10-20k/day) traffic, no signal

crossing heavy (20k/day) traffic, no signal

-120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

To compensate for listed feature, cyclist willing to ride

...

FAS BikeGPS

(11)

Surprisingly consistent results

Non-commute trips

Female cyclists

Facilities

Slope

Traffic

Buffered lanes?

Cycle tracks?

Burnside Bridge?

(12)

Some differences

Commuting

Traffic

Bike lanes

Delay

Alleyways & Unpaved

(13)

Ped route choice

Alternatives: random

walks around the shortest

path

Complex crossings

Blockface land-use and

design

Walking to destination or

transit

(14)

Attribute

Distance

Equivalent

Per additional…

turn

+54 m

unsignalized arterial crossing

+73 m

collector crossing w/o marked crosswalk

+28 m

Change in perceived distance along…

ten percent upslope

+99 %

unpaved or alley

+51 %

busy street (collector or larger)

+14 %

(15)

Compared with cyclists

Facilities

Intersections

Wayfinding/Inertia

Traffic

Adjacent Land Use

Detours

And…traveling with

(16)

Stay tuned this Winter…

Origin/Destination Built Environment Route-level Built Environment Tour Attributes Route Time/Cost Walk/Bike Route Choice Walk/Bike Networks Shortest Path Motorized Networks Mode Availability Mode Choice Sociodemog. Attitudes Trip Context Presented Today Completed Task Coming Soon!

(17)

Application:

crosswalk

location

50m

Bus

stop

Bus

stop

Model suggests

this crosswalk may

be too much of a

detour for peds.

(18)

Biking

the new

bridge:

(19)

Some thanks are in order

Jennifer Dill, John

Gliebe, dissertation

committee

(O)TREC & Robert

Wood Johnson

Metro & PBOT

Geostats (Westat)

(20)

References

Related documents

The 7th Annual Bike Palo Alto Day had a special featured destination this year- a new stop along the route for the newly added Bike and Roll Expo that took place in front of City

Take a flying start at Museum aan de Stroom (MAS), after which you walk from the futuristic Port House to Parkbrug, through the FelixArchief building all the way to China Town.

Among patients with level 3 or 4 disease, compared with patients with level 1 or 2 disease, there was no higher rate of complications, or no higher resource utilization of length

The results demonstrate the complexity of the radiometric response to range, re flectance, and laser temperature and show that neural networks can accurately estimate apparent

1 Creating affordable rental spaces for businesses Providing more affordable housing where people can walk/bike to public transit Making it easier and safer to bike and walk to

In this paper, we describe a multi-level static cache architecture that stores five different item types: query results, precomputed scores, posting lists, precomputed intersections

We assayed wild-type HA fusion peptide and two mutants, G1E and G13L, for their effects on the bilayer structure of 1,2-dioleoyl-3- sn -phosphatidylcholine/1,2-dioleoyl-3-

We analyse the role of educational choice on the degree of occupational segregation in Trinidad and Tobago during a period in which educational policies intent on equating gender