PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 1
An Introduction to Reliability
testing
Dr Jane Marshall
Product Excellence using 6 Sigma Module
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 2
Objectives of this session
• Reliability testing• Accelerated life testing • RET testing
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 3
Product life cycle
Development
Design
FMECA, FTA, PoF,RBD FE,accelerated life test
Development Test Manufacture SPC Test ESS, Burn-in Use
Field data analysis FRACAS
What is a test ?
• A test has been defined as
– "a subjection to conditions that show the real character of the thing”
Purposes of testing
• The purposes of testing are numerous.
– A test may be performed to see whether a certain configuration or item is feasible.
– A test may be used to determine which of several configurations is the optimum with respect to performance, reliability, cost, modes of behaviour under varying conditions, etc.
– A test maybe used to make more sensitive comparisons to further improve economy, maintenance, use of standard parts, and so on. – A test may be used to demonstrate whether the item is adequate to meet
the requirements of performance and reliability.
– A test can be used as thorough investigation of the latent capabilities of the item under severer or more diverse conditions than those immediately anticipated.
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 5
Define exactly what requires testing - bearing in mind that the objective is to minimize the number of tests required for cost reasons
The test types may be categorized as follows: -Mandatory
Testing based on pedigree or experience
Data driven test requirements.
Goal: To minimize the number of tests required.
What should we be testing ?
Mandatory Testing
Tests based on regulatory requirements - e.g. Road worthiness
Tests based on safety requirements
Tests based on customer requirements
Tests based on competitor benchmark
What should we be testing ?
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 7
Testing based on pedigree or experience:
-A historical product with similar physical and performance attributes and similar testing may be referred to as a guide.
Manufacturing and development engineers may have a ‘feel’ for the type of testing required based on previous experience.
Need to determine the frequency of testing. Each and every product
Each and every product for a limited period
Periodic testing
Regulatory requirement testing at a specified interval/frequency
Goal: To test units as infrequently as possible.
Frequency of testing
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 9
Time based testing
• when an item fails,
• which part in a component causes failure • which component in a system fails.
• the mode or modes of failure as exemplified by performance drift, erratic performance,
catastrophic failure, etc.,
• the mechanism of failure that is, the reasons for failure caused by poor design, part misapplication, etc.
• In this case samples of the equipment are tested
repeatedly through their cycle of operation until failure. • This testing, which is analogous to time-to-failure
testing, becomes the more meaningful test when
starting and stopping operations are more destructive than the mere accumulation of time.
• The important parameter in this form of testing is mean number of cycles to failure
Event testing
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 11
Environmental testing
• As its name implies, this form of testing
represents a survey of the reaction of the item to the various environments.
• It is usually required in qualification tests and is frequently introduced in the development stage, usually at less numerous or less severe
Tests used during design
and development
• Accelerated life tests • Qualification tests • Software testing
• Development testing – RET, Growth testing, Test, Analyse and fix
– Test to cause failures not to demonstrate successful achievement
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 13
Testing for reliability and
durability
• Test to cause failures
• Not test to demonstrate successful achievement • Use concepts of load and strength to determine
test conditions
Types of Accelerated Test
• High Usage Rate.
• run the product faster than normal, • increase the products duty cycle.
• Care should be taken that the increased usage rate does not increase the other stresses on the product too much, so that the failure mechanism produced are the same as those seen under normal usage rates.
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 15
• Over-stress testing
– This consists of running a product at a higher than normal level of some accelerating stress or stresses to shorten product life or to degrade product
performance factor.
– Typical accelerating stresses are temperature, voltage, mechanical load, thermal cycling, humidity and vibration.
– Over-stress testing is the most common form of accelerated testing.
• Censoring
– This is accelerated testing through a statistical ‘trick’, where the tests are terminated before all the specimens have failed.
– Statistical techniques are then used to predict what the outcome of the test would have been had it run to completion.
– This allows the tests to be shortened considerably and has become common practise.
• Degradation
– Accelerated degradation testing involves over-stress testing but instead of life, product performance is observed as it degrades over time.
– Similar statistical methods to those used for the censoring tests are used to calculate the reliability.
• Specimen Design
– The life of some products can be accelerated through the size, geometry and finish of specimens.
– For instance large specimens fail sooner than small ones, e.g. high capacitance capacitors fail sooner than lower capacitance ones of the same design, this is because the large capacitors have more dielectric area.
Types of Accelerated Test
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 17
Constant stress
• The most common form
• Each specimen is run at a constant stress level. • Mimics the stresses seen in actual use in many
cases and can be simple. • The advantages are
– A constant stress level is easy to maintain – Models for acceleration are well developed
and tested.
Step stress tests
• Progressively increasing stresses are applied to the same sample for constant time intervals while the sample does not fail.
• The fundamental assumption in this kind of test is that the failure probability at each level is independent of previous levels, regardless of previous history.
• Generate data on the product reliability more quickly, but with less precision.
• The step stress test are normally carried out as comparison tests.
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 19
Methods of applying stress
• Progressive Stress Tests
– In progressive stress testing, a specimen undergoes a continuously increasing level of stress.
– The method has similar advantages and disadvantages to the step stress test.
• Cyclic Stress
– In use some products repeatedly undergo a cyclic stress loading, for example all AC electrical products see a sinusoidal stress.
– A cyclic stress test for a product repeatedly loads a specimen with the same stress pattern at high stress levels.
– For many products this cycle is sinusoidal, for others the duty cycle repeats but is not sinusoidal.
• Random Stress
– In a random stress test, a random stress loading is applied to the specimen for a random time and then removed another random stress for some other random time and so on.
‘Elephant’ or proof tests
• Such tests are often called– torture tests, – shake and bake, – killer tests,
– design margin tests – design limit tests.
• If the product survives the test then it passes and is judged to be a ‘good’ product.
• If the product fails it is usually redesigned to remove the cause of failure.
• Elephant tests are normally performed on a few specimens which are subject to a single severe stress level for a fixed time.
• An elephant test may not produce certain important failures that are seen in practice and so a series of different elephant tests may have to be used.
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 21
• Accelerated degradation is concerned with models and data analysis or product performance over time at overstress and design conditions.
• These form of tests have an advantages over accelerated life tests since performance degradation data can be analysed earlier before any specimens fail.
• This is done by extrapolating performance degradation to estimate a time where performance reaches a failure level.
Accelerated Degradation tests
• Tests that are carried out in the design and development phase of a product to remove defects.
• The standard approach is
– TEST – ANALYSE – FIX
• Various methods exist for analysis of the data
Reliability Enhancement Tests
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 23
RET
• Purpose is to improve design and increase durability • Step stress testing – combination of stresses
• Do not simulate environment
• Stresses in excess of those seen in service • HALT – highly accelerated life testing
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 25
What stress limits?
• Increase stress to cause failures but limit by:
– Technological limits – Test capability
• Use unrepresentative stresses because:
– Future causes of failure uncertain – Probabilities to failure uncertain – Time spent on testing expensive
– Finding causes of failure during development less expensive in the long run
Tests used prior to shipment
to the customer
• Environmental Stress Screening – ESS • Demonstration testing
– This involves accelerated testing of products under a combination of random vibration and thermal cycling and shock - shake and bake.
– It has two major purposes,
• as an elephant test during development
• as an accelerated burn in to improve reliability.
– It is widely used for military, industrial and consumer electronics.
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 27
Environmental stress
screening (ESS)
– Burn-in consists of running items under design or accelerated conditions for a suitable length of time. – Burn-in is a manufacturing operation that is intended
to fail short-lived units (defectives, sometimes called freaks).
– If burn-in is successful then the production units will have few early failures.
– Burn-in is primarily used for electronic components
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 29
FRACAS
• Failure reporting and corrective action system • Closed-loop system for identifying, assessing,
and correcting failure-related problems in a timely manner
• Start of project
• Used by all personnel • Review team
Summary
• Introduction to reliability testing
– Design and development • Accelerated life testing • RET • Reliability Growth – Pre-delivery testing • ESS • Demonstration • FRACAS
Inputs
Outputs
Product
Spec Top Level Process
Airworthi ness requirem ents Tech. Risk analysis Safety & reliability requirem ents Verificatio n reports Declaratio n of design and performan ce Complian ce analysis Define tests to be performed Write test plan Plan resources Complete Testing Analyse Test Results Draw Conclusions external & internal customer requirem ents Additional testing requireme nts
The generic “test” process
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 31
Inputs Outputs
Sub process - Define tests to be performed
List of grouped tests with definition of test method and design Group tests which can be done together List all tests required Define test method e.g. mechanical environmental performance reliability
Define test goal
Identify constraints budget people time Define verification test plan taking into account variation of inputs Identify test inputs Take account of experience data Identify potential relationships between inputs and outputs Identify levels for test inputs
Inputs Outputs List of grouped tests with definition of test method and procedure
Sub process - Plan resources
Allocate people resource Allocate budget Allocate test equipment Procure test equipment Procure test hardware Define hardware requirements Define test equipment requirements Verify Calibration is up to date for test equipment
Write test plan - include information from test method
test design lessons learned standard formats
Completed test plan with resources including verified test equipment
Sub process - Write test plan
Define tests to be performed Write test plan Plan resources Complete Testing Analyse Test Results Draw Conclusions
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 33
Inputs Outputs
Sub process - Complete Testing
Completed test plan with resources including verified test equipment Test Results
Run test as planned
Record Test Results
Record unusual events or observations Define tests to be performed Write test plan Plan resources Complete Testing Analyse Test Results Draw Conclusions
Inputs Outputs Analyse Test Results
Test Results Test Report Complianc e Analysis
Use engineering knowledge Use engineering analytical tools
Produce test report
Complete/update compliance analysis Update lessons leaned database Define tests to be performed Write test plan Plan resources Complete Testing Analyse Test Results Draw Conclusions
PEUSS 2011/2012 Reliability testing Page 35
Inputs Outputs
Sub process - Draw Conclusions
Test Report Complianc e Analysis Verificatio n reports Declaratio n of design and performan ce Complian ce analysis Additional testing requireme nts
Decide if test was successful or not
Decide what additional testing is required