• No results found

SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems

Lecture 7: Closed Loop Control Systems Final Value Theorem and Steady State Error

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny Adjunct Lecturer

Space and Communication Engineering Zewail City of Science and Technology

Fall 2016

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 1 / 19

(2)

Lecture Outline:

1 The Final Value Theorem.

2 The Steady State Error.

(3)

Table of Contents

1 The Final Value Theorem.

2 The Steady State Error.

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 3 / 19

(4)

The Final Value Theorem:

Sometimes, it is important to know the final value (FV) of the system response or the steady state value, y (∞). Finding the y (∞) is impossible

mathematically. So, we can find the final value by computing the limits when time approaches infinity. (limt→∞y (t)).

(5)

The Final Value Theorem:

If the output converges to a single value, the final value is exist.

If the output diverges to infinity or oscillates continuously, no meaning for the final value.

How do we calculate final value ? Time Domain:

Final Value = f (t = ∞) = lim

t→∞y (t)

If we have a system defined by

differential equations, it requires a lot of calculations to find the final value in time-domain.

We need to find the final value in S-domain directly.

Example

¨

y + 3 ˙y + 2y = δ(0) what lim

t→∞?

in S-domain:

s2Y (s) + 3sY (s) + 2Y (s) = 1 Algebric What is the S-domain version of

limt→∞y (t) ?

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 5 / 19

(6)

The Final Value Theorem:

Final Value Theorem:

t→∞lim y (t) = lim

s→0sY (s)

1 Find Laplace transform, Y (s).

2 Multiply it by s.

3 Find lims→0.

Advantage: Easy to calculate since most of the time we have the system

represented in s-domain.

But: We can not always use the final value theorem !

(7)

The Final Value Theorem:

RHP

Y (s) = 1 s − 2 FVT = lim

s→0sY (s) = 0

Wrong!

jw-axis

Y (s) = 1 s2+ 4 FVT = lim

s→0sY (s) = 0

Wrong!

LHP

Y (s) = 1 s + 2 FVT = lim

s→0sY (s) = 0

(Correct!)

Origin (integrator)

Y (s) = 1 s FVT = lim

s→0sY (s) = 1

(Correct!) Don’t use the Final Value Theorem if the system poles lie in the RHP or on the

jw-axis!

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 7 / 19

(8)

Table of Contents

1 The Final Value Theorem.

2 The Steady State Error.

(9)

The Steady State Error:

Any physical control system inherently suffers steady-state error in response to certain types of inputs.

A system may have no steady-state error to a step input, but the same system may exhibit nonzero steady-state error to a ramp input.

Control systems may be classified according to their ability to follow step inputs, ramp inputs, parabolic inputs, and so on.

The magnitudes of the steady-state errors due to these individual inputs are

indicative of the goodness of the system.

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 9 / 19

(10)

The Steady State Error:

Definition (System Type)

Consider the unity-feedback control system with the following open-loop transfer function:

sN in the denominator, represents N poles at the origin.

A system is called type 0, type 1, type 2, ... , if N = 0, N = 1, N = 2, ... ,

respectively.

Examples G (s) = s + 1

s type 1

G (s) = s − 3

s2 type 2

G (s) = s + 1

s + 2 type 0

(11)

The Steady State Error:

The transfer function between the error signal E (s) and the input signal R(s) is:

E (s) R(s) =

1 1 + G (s) The final-value theorem provides a convenient way to find the steady-state performance of a stable system.

ess = lim

t→∞e(t) = lims→0sE (s)

ess = lim

s→0

sR(s) 1 + G (s)

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 11 / 19

(12)

The Steady State Error:

[1] Unit Step Input:

ess = lim

s→0

s 1 + G (s)

1 s ess = 1

1 +G (0) Kp: Static position error:

Kp= lim

s→0G (s) = G (0)

For type 0 system:

ess = 1 1 + K For type 1 system:

(13)

The Steady State Error:

[2] Unit Ramp Input:

ess = lim

s→0

s 1 + G (s)

1 s2 ess = 1

sG (s) Kv: Static velocity error:

Kv = lim

s→0sG (s)

ess = 1 Kv

For type 0 system:

ess = 1 Kv = ∞ For type 1 system:

ess = 1 Kv

= 1 K

For type 2 system:

ess = 1 Kv

= 0

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 13 / 19

(14)

The Steady State Error:

[3] Unit Parabolic Input:

ess = lim

s→0

s 1 + G (s)

1 s3 ess = 1

s2G (s) Ka: Static acceleration

error: Ka = lim

s→0s 2G (s)

For type 0 system:

ess = 1 Ka

= ∞ For type 1 system:

For type 2 system:

ess= 1 Ka =

1 K For type 3 system:

1

(15)

The Steady State Error:

Summary:

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 15 / 19

(16)

The Steady State Error:

Example

For the system shown in figure below evaluate the static error constants Kp, Kv and Ka and find the expected steady state errors for the unit step, ramp and parabolic inputs.

(17)

The Steady State Error:

Solution

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 17 / 19

(18)

QUIZ!

By using Routh table, determine K values that guarantee stability for the following characteristic equation:

s4+ 10s3+ 35s2+ (50 + K )s + (24 − 2K ) = 0

Time Allowed: 10 Minutes.

(19)

End of Lecture

Best Wishes

[email protected]

Dr. Haitham El-Hussieny SPC318: System Modeling and Linear Systems 19 / 19

References

Related documents

Commercial aircraft programs inventory included the following amounts related to the 747 program: $448 of deferred production costs at December 31, 2011, net of previously

Precise workload prediction for new drivers is challeng- ing due to its nonmeasurability and a lack of personalized data. This paper addressed the issue by maximally exploit- ing

innovation in payment systems, in particular the infrastructure used to operate payment systems, in the interests of service-users 3.. to ensure that payment systems

Interestingly, despite the far larger cash transfers paid to upper income families in Britain than in Australia, for the top 20 per cent of the cohort the British cash transfer

Christ before Pilate at the trial of Jesus revealed one of his last claims. Jesus and his word are ultimate truth. The Pontius Pilate and Jesus exchange set the two positions

As untrained teachers, MOE will send them to National Institute of Education (NIE) for the Postgraduate Diploma in Education Programme (PGDE), Diploma in Education (Dip Ed),

inequity”) (quoting Hazel–Atlas Glass Co.. exceptions to the procedural barriers to review. If the reason why a prisoner could not present a Fourth Amendment claim in the

Because advisers had large student caseloads at MCCC, and program group students required more advising time and effort than control group students, the number of program