AMEBIC
PERFORATION
OF THE
INTESTINE
IN CHILDREN
C. de S. Wijesundera, M.B.B.S. (Ceylon), D.C.H. (Ceylon), and
C. C. de Silva, M.D., F.R.C.P.
Department of Paediatrics, Univers-ity of Ceylon
(Submitted January 31, 1962; accepted June 25, 1962.)
ADDRESS: (C.C.deS.) Department of Paediatrics, University of Ceylon, Colombo 8, Ceylon.
PEDr.rwcs, December 1962
937
S
EVEN PATJENTS with amebic perforation of the intestine were admitted to our unit within a period of 8 months in1960-1961. We had not previously diagnosed this condition clinically nor seen it at autopsy
in children.
Case 1
REPORT OF CASES
A Tamil male child, aged 2 years and
weighing 8.9 kg, was admitted on July 10, 1960, with a history of diarrhea with blood
and mucus of one week’s and dyspnea of 3 days’ duration. On the first day, the child had passed six stools which were semisolid and offensive with mucus but without
blood. On the second day, the stools had been watery. On the third day, blood had
appeared in the stools; and on the fourth, he had in addition a cough with breathless-ness and fever. These symptoms had
con-tinued until admission to the hospital. There was no previous history of diarrhea with
blood and mucus.
On examination the patient’s temperature
was 38.9#{176}C;he was moderately dyspneic
and mildly dehydrated. The breath sounds were vesicular, and medium crepitations
were heard bilaterally in all zones of the chest. His abdomen was slightly distended without tenderness or rigidity. His stools
were watery with blood and mucus, and the smear showed numerous active troph-ozoites of the Entameba histolytica.
The child was given oxytetracycline (200 mg) and iodochlorhydroxy-quinoline (250 mg) each three times a day. The diarrhea
continued, with three to four daily stools containing blood and mucus which were constantly smeared around the anal orifice.
On July 13, i.e., the fourth day after admis-sion, the abdomen was more distended and moderately tender. Though somewhat
re-sistant, it was not rigid, but the area of liver
dullness was obliterated and peristaltic sounds were not heard. A perforation was
suspected, but the parents refused permis-sion for operation. The patient died on the following morning.
Postmortem examination was done 5
hours after death. When the abdomen was opened, a live round worm was seen in the peritoneal cavity. There was yellow, offen-sive pus in the lower part of the abdominal
cavity, and a loop of small intestine showed
signs of inflammation. There was a
perfora-tion on the lateral side of the middle of the descending-colon, through which blood and mucus exuded. On closer examination, three
perforations were seen close together (Fig.
1). The mucosal surface of the entire large
intestine showed numerous small ulcers which were irregular in shape with
under-mined edges. Ulceration was most extensive
in the cecum, pelvic colon, and rectum. Whipworms were attached to the mucous
membrane of the whole of the large intes-tine. Microscopically the large intestine showed necrosis of the mucous membrane with infiltration of all the coats, especially
the submucosa, with amebae and round cells (Fig. 2). The liver showed fatty in-filtration. The stools did not show any
Salmonella and Shigella organisims on cul-ture.
Case 2
A Sinhalese male child, aged 6 years,
weighing 16.4 kg, was admitted on July
blood and mucus, vomiting of 2 weeks, and
fever of 9 days’ duration. About 15 days earlier the patient had been given treatment for ascariasis (syrup of piperazine citrate),
and 40 round worms had been passed. On the next day, the child had 10 watery stools and had vomited twice. Tile stools were scanty and offensive with blood and mucus,
and the symptoms persisted in spite of out-door treatment for 5 days. Pyrexia with
profuse sweating had commenced on July
13, with abdominal distension and dyspnea from July 18, without any pain or
tender-ness referred to tile abdomen.
The patient had had a chronic, recurrent cough following an attack of whooping cough at the age of 9 months. No previous
history of diarrhea was elicited from the
parents.
On examination the temperature was
37.8#{176}C,and the patient looked very ill. He
was mildly dehydrated. His breath sounds
were vesicular with bilateral coarse
crepita-tions. The abdomen was resistant and
dis-tended without any tenderness. The patient
FIG. 1. Case 1. Mucosal surface of large intestine. The arrows indicate perforations.
Fic. 2. Case 1. Section of large intestine showing
necrotic mucous membrane and numerous amebae in mucosa and submucosa.
vomited twice on the day of admission. He was given oxytetracycline, 200 mg three times a day by mouth, and 300 ml of N/2 saline solution with 12.5% dextrose intrave-nously. On the next day his condition was much worse; the abdomen was now resistant,
tender, and distended; the liver dullness was obliterated, but faint peristalic sounds were heard. On examination ulcers were palpable in the rectum. The patient continued to pass
blood and mucus in the stools, which were swarming with trophozoites of the Entameba histolytica. He was given 200 ml of N/2
saline solution with 12.5% dextrose and 300 ml of N/4 saline solution with 12.5%
dex-trose intravenously. The general condition remained more or less the same but im-proved after a transfusion of 20 ml of
blood. He did not pass any stools that night.
On July 21, 1960, the patient was operated
upon. About % pint (250 ml) of purulent
fluid was found in the peritoneal cavity.
The appendix was gangrenous and
perfor-ated in two places. It was lying against the
939
Fic. 3. Case 2. Section through the inner muscle layer of the large intestine, stained with a modified P.A.S. stain,17 showing amebae as dark spots
sur-rounded by a clear space. (xllO)
apposition to a perforation of the cecum. The
appendix was removed and the cecal per-foration was closed. A smear from the
per-foration in the appendix showed live E. histolytica. The patient died the same eve-ning without regaining consciousness.
A limited autopsy was done through the operation wound about 14 hours after death;
the lungs were congested, there was cystic bronchiectasis of the lingula of the left
lung. There was extensive ulceration of the
mucosal surface of the large intestine, most marked in the cecum, pelvic colon, and rectum; tile ulcers were irregular with
un-dermined edges, and there were numerous whipworms attached to the mucous
mem-brane of the large intestine.
Histological examination of the large
in-testine silowed necrosis of the mucous
mem-brane and infiltration of all the coats with
Fic. 5. Case 2. Section through the muscle and peritoneal coats of large in-testine. Arrow indicates an ameba in peritoneal coat. (x 150)
amebae and round cells, with occasional polymorphonuclear leukocytes; mononu-clear cellular infiltration was prominent in
the muscular layer (Figs. 3-6). The stools did not show any Salmonella and Shigella
organisms on culture.
Case 3
A Sinhalese male child, aged 2 years 5
months and weighing 9.6 kg, was admitted
to the hospital on September 23, 1960, with
a history of fever, diarrhea, and vomiting of 12 days’ duration. The stools were semisolid and frothy and contained blood or mucus
for the 5 days prior to admission. The child
had passed seven round worms with the
stools and had vomited seven times. He had
had a similar attack one year ago, which
subsided after a week’s treatment in the
ward.
On examination the child was found to
be moderately well nourished. The
tempera-FIG. 6. Case 2. High magnification of the ameba indicated in Figure 5.
ture was 37.8#{176}C, but he was not dehy-drated; his tongue was moist and pink, and
angular stomatitis was present. His pulse rate was 142 per minute, and the volume
and tension were good. The examination of
the heart showed nothing abnormal, but there were coarse crepitations over both
lungs. Tile abdomen was firm with
general-ised tenderness, but it was not distended;
peristaltic sounds were not heard, but the
area of liver dullness was not impaired.
From the time of admission the child passed several stools which consisted mostly
of blood-stained mucus. The fecal smears were swarming with very active
tropho-zoites of E. histolytica.
A perforation was suspected, and the
child was prepared for a laparotomy on the
same evening. On palpation under
anes-thesia, there was a lump in the right iliac fossa. On opening into the abdominal
cay-ity through a MacBurney incision, the omentum was seen to be covering the cecal area. On raising the omentum a 2 to 3 in. long strip of the anterior wall of the cecum
and ascending colon between the anterior
and tile medial tenia coli was seen to be sloughing and gangrenous, and the intes-tinal contents with blood and mucus exuded through multiple perforations. The margins
of the healthy portion of the intestine were sutured together, leaving the gangrenous
part everted and not in continuity with the lumen of the intestine.
He was given oxytetracycline, 200 mg, and emetine, 15 mg, intramuscularly about 4 hours before the operation. Administration
of the latter drug was repeated about 1
hour after the operation. Therapy was con-tinued with oxytetracycline, 200 mg three times a day by mouth; emetine, 15 mg
in-tramuscularly once a day; and iodochlor-hydroxyquinoline, 250 mg twice a day. Also,
300 ml of 5% dextrose in N/2 saline and 200
ml of blood were administered intrave-nously during and after the operation. The
same intravenous therapy was continued until September 25; but Darrow’s solution,
200 ml intravenously, was added when
signs of hypokalemia appeared.
The patient continued to show
improve-ment in his general condition, though the
abdomen was distended, with obliteration of the liver dullness. He continued to pass
blood and mucus containing live amebae per rectum. They were, however, less nu-merous and more sluggish in their move-ments. There were also numerous
whip-worm ova in the stools. From September
25 he was given a diet of orange juice and
malted milk. Owing to the persistence of
live amebae in the stools, he was given a chiniofon enema on September 26. On the
following day the patient became much worse. Analysis of the serum for electro-lytes showed sodium, 132 meq/l; potassium, 2.2 meq/l; and chlorides, 92 meq/l. He was
given intravenously 400 ml of normal
sa-line solution wih 5% dextrose and 400 ml of Darrow’s solution. Gastric suction was
in-stituted. He died on September 28, 5 days after the operation. The parents refused
permission for a postmortem examination.
The stools did not show any Salmonella or
Shigella organisms on culture.
Case 4
A Sinhalese male child, aged 1 year 10
months, was admitted to the hospital on
October 29, 1960, with a history of diarrhea
and vomiting of 10 days’ duration. He had
passed 10 to 12 watery stools per day, with
blood and mucus, from the second day of
illness. He had no history of fever or cough,
but edema of the feet was visible since the morning prior to admission.
On examination the child was
comfort-able and did not show any signs of dehy-dration. There were no abnormal findings
in his respiratory or cardiovascular systems.
His abdomen was soft without any
disten-sion or tenderness. His stools were watery with blood and mucus; microscopically
there was no evidence of any parasitic in-festation. The patient was given
sulphadia-zine, 0.5 gm, every 6 hours. Food was
omitted for 8 hours, and intravenous fluids
no improvement on sulphadiazine therapy,
he was given iodochlorhydroxyquinoline,
125 mg twice daily, and neomycin with
kaopectate, 1 drachm (60 ml) every 8 hours.
On November 5 the stools were positive for
E. histolytica. Round worm ova, whipworm
ova, and Giardia lamblia cysts were found
at subsequent smear examinations. From
November 5 the patient was given emetine,
10 mg intramuscularly per day;
iodochlor-hydroxyqumnoline, 125 mg twice daily; and
oxytetracyclmne, 125 mg twice daily. The
child was drowsy and restless with
abdomi-nal distension from November 6. On the
next day he had slight neck stiffness, but
the cerebrospinal fluid was normal. Tue
stools continued to contain a surfeit of
blood and mucus. Intestinal sounds were
heard. On November 9 the child looked
very toxic, and there was marked
abdomi-nal distension with moderate resistance and
tenderness. The intestinal sounds were no
longer heard. The liver dullness was
ab-sent. A perforation was suspected, and he
was operated on the same evening. There
was pus in the peritoneal cavity. The lateral
wall of the cecum was gangrenous with a
perforation measuring 3 in. diameter. The
appendix was inflamed and friable.
Cecos-tomy was done as a change from the
previ-ous routine of repairing the perforations,
since none of the previous patients
oper-ated on had recovered.
We continued the same drugs and
intra-venous fluid therapy as well as giving a
transfusion with 300 ml of blood. The stools continued to be positive for amebae. He was also given emetine, dissolved in water, via the colostomy tube on November 9. The
patient died on November 12, 3 days after
operation. The stool cultures were negative
for Salmonella and Shigella organisms on
two occasions. No postmortem examination
was allowed.
Case 5
A Sinhalese female child, aged 3 years
3 months and weighing 6.6 kg, was
ad-mitted to the hospital on January 23,
1961, with a history of diarrhea with blood
and mucus of 10 days’ duration and
tem-perature of 37.8#{176}Cwitil dyspnea since the
morning of admission. On examination the patient was in a state of collapse with cold
extremities and an imperceptible pulse.
On examination of the chest the
percus-sion note was resonant and the breath
sounds were vesicular; fine crepitations were heard, especially over the bases; the
ab-domen was distended and soft with general-ized tenderness. The child’s condition be-came worse on the next morning. The liver
dullness was obliterated, and the abdomen was moderately tense. The intestinal sounds
were not heard. There were live E. histo-lytica in the stools. The case was diagnosed
as one of amebic perforation.
In view of Barker’s report, which claimed some recoveries with conservative treatment, we decided to treat this patient in the same manner. She was given neomy-cm witll kaopectate before the amebae were discovered in tile stools and
iodochlorhy-droxyquinoline and oxytetracycline after the positive fecal report. She was also given
200 ml of 10% dextrose solution and 150 ml
of blood intravenously. However her
condi-tion deteriorated rapidly, and she died on the morning of January 24, 1961, the day
after the admission to hospital.
Postmortem examination was done about
3 ilOurs after death. There was fluid with blood and mucus in the peritoneal cavity.
The large intestine was necrotic and friable, with multiple perforations throughout its
length (Fig. 7); the mesenteric glands were enlarged; the mucous membrane was
ex-tensively ulcerated with only a few islands of normal tissue left. There were
whip-worms attached to these intact areas of
mucous membrane. The lungs were con-gested.
Microscopically, section of the large
in-testine showed necrosis throughout the
943
FIG. 7. Case 5. Open abdomen, showing numerous perforations of large intestines, indicated by white
indicators.
lungs showed areas of congestion collapse
and emphysema, and tile liver showed marked fatty infiltration.
Case 6
A Sinhalese male child, aged 1 year 5 months, was admitted to the hospital on
February 20, 1961, with a history of fever
and diarrhea of 2 weeks’ duration and
dysp-nea of sudden onset since the previous
eve-ning. He had passed three to four watery
stools with blood and mucus per day.
Fic. 8. Necrotic tract through the muscle coat of large intestines.
(x
166)On examination the patient was cold,
clammy, and collapsed, and his pulse was of low volume and tension; the abdomen was distended and tense.
In the respiratory system, the percussion
Fic. 10. An ameba in the peritoneal coat shown in Figure 9 under higher magnification. (x750)
note was resonant bilaterally, the breath
sounds were vesicular, and there were fine crepitations on both sides. Continuous gas-tric suction was instituted, and about 4 oz
of “coffee ground” fluid was aspirated from the stomach. The patient died one hour after admission.
Postmortem examination was done about 6 hours after death. The abdomen was
dis-tended. There was purulent fluid in the peritoneal cavity and three perforations in the large intestines (two in the ascending colon and one in the pelvic colon). There was ulceration of the mucous membrane of the large intestine, the ulcers being irregu-lar with undermined edges and intact
mu-cosa between, typical of amebic ulceration.
There were no whipworms to be seen. The liver was enlarged to two fingerbreadths below the costal margin. There was
con-solidation at the base of left lung. Micro-scopically, the liver showed fatty change. There was necrosis of the mucosa of the large intestine with round cell infiltration
and edema of the submucosa. Structures re-sembling amebae were seen infiltrating the submucosa.
Case 7
A Muslim male child, aged 4 years and
weighing 9.9 kg, was admitted to the
hos-pital on May 2, 1961, with a history of diarrhea with blood and mucus of three weeks’ duration. He had vomited several
times on the day of admission.
On examination his temperature was
38.3#{176}C. He was moderately well nourished but dehydrated; his tongue was moist and
coated.
In the respiratory system, the percussion
note was resonant, and the breath sounds were vesicular with bilateral coarse
crepi-tations and rlionchi.
In the cardiovascular system, the pulse was regular at 100 per minute, the apex
beat was in the fourth left intercostal space, medial to the midclavicular line; both
sounds were heard and there were no
mur-murs. Tile abdomen was soft but diffusely
tender. The child was given an intravenous
infusion of N/4 saline and 5% dextrose so-lution, 150 ml, followed by 200 ml of 10%
dextrose that night, and oxytetracycline, 150 mg, every 8 hours by mouth. He was
also given Eledon (half-skimmed lactic acid
milk) feedings. The stools were found to be teeming with E. histolytica. On the fol-lowing day the child’s condition became worse, with an anxious look on the face; but his abdomen was not distended though
.-. 4 .
.- .- E- - ci
r .-
-E-
E-ci
‘
.,-‘
_
U- ‘ ‘c I,
c ‘ ‘0 *t
- ie
U
0ci .
r .I .2
-I’ h- .2’ .
, c
r’, - : ,_ .b
I
CE
:
:
E.4E.: I) C)
ci- 4 C
c
: -u
#{176} I 5) .1i?
cI C C
R ‘u
E--
-‘
c 0
,
0
.,-‘
I!
C 0 0#{176} b’,, 0
11) dci cii cii cibi ci ci ci c10 Il-a
.#{176} i)i) Q)ci C)-#{149} i) i) i) i) i?
_ci -#{176}.. - a ,,a
O, “i)O.
.O .E
2 2
- h -
-U-
-G - -
II-. . . . . .
TABLE II PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS Case Na inber A utopsy; . Operation . . . Perrtonztls . She of .. Perforatlon
3lultiple Stools for
. .
or Slngie Entumeba
. .
Perforatlon IIlstoiytlca
.
Illstology of Large Intestine
1 A P Descemling colon 3 P Infiltration iy round cells & amebae;
necrosis of mucosa
2 0 & A P Cecum & appen(Iix 3 P Inflltrationl)yroundcells &amel)ae; necrosis of mucosa
3 0 P Cecum & ascend- Multiple P Not (lone
ing colon
4 0 P Cecum & appendix Multiple P Not done
.5 A P Entire colon Multiple P Necrosis of wall; infiltration with
alslebae
6 A P Ascending colon Not (lone
1
Infiltration by round cells & amebae;
and necrosis of mucosa
7 A P (?) (?) (i’) Not (lone
was doubtful. Rectal ulcers were palpable
per anum. The abdomen became increas-ingly distended. Intravenous fluids were continued in the form of N/2 saline and 5% dextrose solution, 500 ml, followed by N/4 saline and 5% dextrose, 300 ml. He was
given a single dose of emetine hydrochlo-ride, 10 mg, on May 3.
The child’s condition gradually
deterio-rated on the next day. The abdomen be-came more distended with disappearance of the liver dullness. He was given 10% dextrose, 300 ml, intravenously. He died on the morning of May 5 (on the fourth day
after admission). Permission was not granted for autopsy.
However, a paracentesis of the abdomen immediately after death showed purulent fluid in the peritoneal cavity, teeming with live E. histolytica.
COMMENT
Reports of amebic perforation of the in-testine in children have been rare, but more
and more cases are now being reported. Manson Bahr2 had seen only four cases. Anderson et al. found them in 10.7% of autopsies on all deaths at all ages from ame-biasis. Herrera et al. reported a single case
in a child, while Cordoba et al.5 had a
series of 11 cases of intestinal perforations
due to amebae in children. Ravinna et al.#{176}
reported four fatalities in children due to
amebic perforation. Faust,7 however, in his monograph on amebiasis quotes Armstrong
et al. that 10% of 2,500 Africans in Durban, Natal, who entered the hospital with ful-minating amebic dysentery, died of
perfor-ation and collapse. We have been unable to ascertain how many of these cases, if
any, were in children. Joan Scragg9 from Durban, South Africa, has stated that of
57 deaths from amebiasis in children, 13 (22%) had frank perforations with
perito-nitis; 3 of these 13 had associated liver abscesses. In the Children’s Hospital, Co-lombo, though acute and chronic amebiasis
is very commonly encountered, these seven
cases are so far the only ones to be re-ported. Over the period of 1956-1960 in the
University Unit at the Children’s Hospital, there were 136 cases of amebiasis with 14 deaths (10.3%), which included 4 in 1960 reported here due to perforations. Of these
seven cases under review, amebae were demonstrated in the first five, and also
shown microscopically in the sections of the
large intestines in Cases 1, 2, 5, and 6. In Case 7 E. histolytica were present in the peritoneal fluid which was aspirated after death.
possibly due to a greater awareness of the
condition as a result of the postmortem
con-firmation of the diagnosis in the first case. \Ve now believe that this is a more frequent
complication of amebiasis in children than liver abscess.
We have little doubt that the amebae were responsible for tile perforations,
pos-sibiy aided by bacteria and helminths. We
have silown the amebae infiltrating the mus-cular coats of the intestine and peritoneum
(Figs. 3-6 & 8-10). This is not likely to be a
postmortem invasion, because there is as-sociated round cell infiltration. Furthermore, we store tile bodies under refrigeration com-mencing an hour after death, and amebae
would soon become inactive and die at
those temperatures. In Case 7 amebae were
silOwn in the peritoneal fluid which was
aspirated immediately after death.
The cytolytic propetries of amebae are
well documented. PauP#{176}has shown massive amebic infiltration of the muscles of the
anterior abdominal wall with illustrations.
Therefore it is not surprising that with the
extensive destruction of the mucosa and
submucosa associated with the teeming
bil-lions of amebae, that tile exposed deeper coats of the intestine should be invaded by the amebae. That the extensive tissue
ne-crosis is not a postmortem phenomenon is
shown by the fact that in Case 3 it was seen
at operation.
We are not aware of any other organism or agency capable of such destruction of
the large intestine, whereas there are flu-merous reports, especially from workers in South Africa, of such lesions said to be caused by amebae. All perforations due to
the Ascaris have occurred in the small
in-testine or appendix, never in our experience
in the large intestine.
Balantidum coli is known to cause ulcer-ation of tile mucosa and submucosa of the
large intestine. We did not detect this
or-ganism in our cases, and it is very rare in
Ceylon.
In Case 1 it may be argued that the round worm found in the peritoneum
caused tile perforations of an already
ul-cerated intestine, as was thought to be pos-sible by Oschner et al.h1 But there were three perforations, which are unlikely to have been caused by one round worm which had already escaped into the
pen-toneal cavity. Some of the perforations seen especially in Figure 7 are probably anti-facts; if so, they were produced in spite of
the gentlest handling of an intestine ne-crosed to the consistency of wet blotting paper. This particular postmortem
exami-nation was done only 3 hours after death. In our case there were some conflicting clinical signs. In the first, fifth, and seventh
cases there was a misleading absence or rigidity of tile abdomen until very late, so much so that the diagnosis of perforation
was in doubt in the first two cases. In Case 2 there was only very slight resistance of the abdomen. The features that appeared
early were abdominal distension and oblit-eration of the liver dullness, but there was generalized tenderness and absence of
per-istaltic sounds. In Cases 2 and 4 penistaltic
sounds were heard until late. It is more
than possible that the diagnosis may often be missed with this misleading
symptoma-tology because many cases of acute diarrhea due to other causes may manifest abdomi-nal distension with tenderness. Since
pen-mission for autopsies is still difficult to
ob-tam, many deaths due to amebic
penfora-tions may be diagnosed as being due to
“acute gastnoenteritis.” Furthermore, dysp-nea due to an associated
bronchopneumo-nia or abdominal distension may also dis-tract the attention of an overworked medi-cal officer from the abdomen to the chest,
as happened in a case where there was a
perforation at postmortem, but which we have omitted from this discussion because
there was no confirmatory evidence that it was amebic in origin.
The utter impotence of the usual
amebi-cidal drugs was brought home to us fond-bly during the treatment of our cases. We
watched with despair while the marauders destroyed the host. In all the cases where
devour-948
ing erythrocytes with their pouting
pseu-dopodia, and this in spite of 4 days of
oxy-tetracycline and iodochlorhydroxquinoline by mouth in Case 1; 2 days of oxytetra-cycline in Case 2; five days of
oxytetracy-clime and emetine in high dosage in Case 3; and 5 days of emetine, oxytetracycline, and
1 day of emetine in Case 7. Emetine has the
serious disadvantage of causing nausea and
vomiting, so that we did not use it in Cases
1 and 2 in view of the toxic state of the
patients. However, since these cases
dem-onstrated that the amebae were a greater hazard than the possible toxicity of the
drug, we used large doses of emetine in Cases 3 and 4 but without any better sue-cess (0.75 mg/lb body weight in Case 3).
Other workers have shared similar expeni-ences regarding amebicidal drugs. Paulbo described a case where the amebae were
attacking the abdominal wall (amebiasis cutis) uninfluenced by the drugs. Arm-strong et 12, 13 stated that no regimen
of treatment has been followed with sue-cess in eliminating E. histolytica from all their patients. Scragg9 mentioned that in all hen 8 years of experience no patient with amebic perforation recovered. Barker1 is to our knowledge the only one who has
claimed 5 recoveries in 19 cases of amebic colonic perforation; of these five, two only were proved to be perforations by x-ray
examination, the remaining three being
din-ical diagnoses. He concludes his excellent paper by saying that “operative treatment has rarely if ever any place in the manage-ment of colonic perforations occurring dur-ing the course of fulminating amebic
dys-enteny. Emphasis is laid on the possibility
of saving a greater number of these cases by means of treatment with intravenous fluid and electrolyte therapy, blood replace-ment, and antiobiotic and anti-amebic
then-apy. This form of treatment, to achieve success, demands great care and attention to detail.”
A feature common to six of these cases
was whipworm infestation of the large
in-testine. Could this have been a factor in the pathogenesis of the ulceration of the
mu-cosa and subsequent perforation of the
in-testine? Westpha1’ showed that certain bacteria were necessary for E. histolytica
to establish itself as a pathogen in the gut. It is well known that in Europeans in Africa
and elsewhere amebiasis is a mild disease which is very rarely fatal. Is this possibly
due to the fact that helminthiasis is less likely to be associated with amebae in
peo-pie with a higher standard of nutrition,
sani-tation, and hygiene? Others have noticed the
association of helminths in general with in-testinal amebiasis. Hence it could be postu-lated that the injury caused by the head of
the whipworm threading through the
mu-cous membrane might open a passage for the amebae to invade it. It has also been the observation of another physician working
in the same hospital as the present authors,
Mirando, that whipworm infestation is
often associated with intestinal amebiasis. If this relationship is considered of
signifi-cance, elimination of the whipworm would
also be necessary in the treatment and pro-phylaxis of amebiasis. However, whipworm infestation is so common in Ceylon that its association with amebic ulceration may well be a fortuitious one without any pathogenic significance. A more extensive clinical study
and possibly animal experimentation would be necessary to verify this. The difficulty, according to the Professor of Parasitology,
University of Ceylon, is to find an animal
host that is susceptible to the pathogenic effects of both the E. and the
Tnichocepha-lus dispar.
Cellular response of tissues to amebic
in-vasion is poor. Tile usual one is a lympho-cytic infiltration, as was seen in the sections of the intestine in these cases. When tissue damage is severe, a polymorphonuclean re-sponse is also said to occur.16 However in
all our cases, though the tissue damage was
very severe, no polymorphonuclear response was seen.
SUMMARY
Seven cases of amebic perforation of the
large intestine in children are presented.
ARTICLES
misleading symptomatology, (b) the rela-tive ineffectiveness of oxytetracycline, the
hydroxyquinoline group of drugs, and eme-tine as amebicidal agents, and (c) the
fail-tire of surgical treatment. Attention is also drawn to the association of whipworm in-festation, with a suggestion that this may
possibly be aiding the amebic invasion of
tile large gut. Neither an operative nor a
conservative regimen has met with any
sue-cess at our hands in saving a single life so fan.
REFERENCES
1. Barker, E. M. : Colonic perforations in amoebia-sis. S. Afr. Med. J., 32:634, 1958.
2. Manson-Bahr, P. G. : Dysenteric Disorders. London, Cassell, 1939, p. 173.
3. Anderson, H. H., Bostic, W. L., and John-ston, I-I. G. : Amebiasis. Springfield, liii-nois, Thomas, 1953, p. 177.
4. Herrera, R. C., et at.: Presentaci#{243}n de un caso de perforaciones multiples de intestino un
ni#{241}o con amibiasis. Bol. Med. Hosp. Inf., 10:423, 1953.
5. Cordoba, P. B., et at.: Perforacion intestinal amibiana en Ia infancia commentario sobre II casos. Anot. Pediat., 21 :239, 1959. 6. Ravinna, A., Joseph, A., and Cohen, W. :
Hare-fuah, 58: 155, 1960.
7. Faust, E. C. : Amebiasis. Springfield, Illinois,
Thomas, 1954, p. 45.
8. Armstrong, T. G., Wilmot, A. J., and Elsdon-Dew, R. : Treatment of amoebic dysentery in Bantu African. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 42:597, 1949.
9. Scragg, J.: Personal communication.
10. Paul, M.: New concepts on amoebic abscess of the liver. Brit. J. Surg., 47:512, 1960.
11. Oschner, A., DeBakey, E. G., and Dixon, J. L.: Complications of ascariasis requiring
surgi-cal treatment. Amer. J. Dis. Child., 77:389, 1949.
12. Armstrong, T. G., Wilmot, A. J., and Elsdon-Dew, R. : Aureomycin and amoebic dysen-tery. Lancet, 2: 10, 1950.
13. Armstrong, T. G., \Vilmot, A. J., and
Elsdon-Dew, R.: Terramycin in amoebic dysentery.
S. Afr. Med. J., 26:766, 1952.
14. \Vestphal, A. : Betrachtungen zur Arbeit von
Koller #{252}berAmobiasis in Neu-Guinea. Arch.
Schiffs- Tropen-Hyg., 41 :262, 1937. 15. Mirando, E. H. : Personal communication.
16. Anderson, H. H., Bostic, W. L., and Johnston,
11. C. : Amebiasis. Springfield, Illinois,
Thomas, 1953, pp. 107-116.
17. Silva, E. E. M.: Periodic acid Schiff staining combined with iron haematoxylin and light
green for amoebae in sections. S. Afr. Med.
J., 26:766, 1952.
Acknowledgment
Our thanks are due to Dr. Stella de Silva for permitting us to publish one of her cases (Case No. 6); to Mr. Justin de Silva and Mr. Irugal
Ban-dara of the Department of Pathology, University of Ceylon, for the preparation of the microscopic slides; to Professor Cooray and his staff of the De-partment of Pathology of the University of Ceylon for reports; and to Mr. Amarasekera and Mr.
Jaya-weera of the Department of Photography, Faculty
of Medicine, University of Ceylon.
Some of the sections were stained by a special technique, to show the Entameba histolytica,
per-fected by Silva” of the Department of Pathology,