• No results found

Depressive Symptoms in Inner-city Mothers of Young Children: Who Is at Risk?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Depressive Symptoms in Inner-city Mothers of Young Children: Who Is at Risk?"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Depressive Symptoms in Inner-city Mothers of Young Children:

Who Is at Risk?

Amy M. Heneghan, MD*; Ellen Johnson Silver, PhD*; Laurie J. Bauman, PhD*; Lauren E. Westbrook, PhD‡; and Ruth E. K. Stein, MD*

ABSTRACT. Objective. To identify factors associated with depressive symptoms in inner-city mothers of young children.

Design. A cross-sectional survey was administered to a convenience sample of English-speaking mothers at-tending a well-child visit for a child aged 6 months to 3 years in a hospital-based, inner-city, general pediatric clinic. The maternal interview collected data on sociode-mographic characteristics, and mothers’ health and finan-cial status. Mothers completed the Psychiatric Symptom Index (PSI), a 29-item checklist shown to have very good validity and reliability in a multicultural population. A total score of >20 represents high levels of symptoms; scores>30 strongly suggest major depression.

Results. Two hundred seventy-nine mothers com-pleted the PSI. Mothers ranged in age from 14 to 48 years (mean, 27 years). Seventy-one percent were unmarried; 57% received public assistance. Forty-two percent of mothers were Hispanic, 40% black, 9% white, and 10% mixed or other races. Forty-eight percent were foreign-born. Twenty-four percent reported having a medical condition; 6% had activity limitation because of illness. The mean PSI score was 19; 18% of mothers had a PSI score>30 and 39% scored>20. PSI scores did not vary by age, race, birthplace, educational level, employment, marital status, or family composition. PSI scores were higher for mothers receiving public assistance (21 vs 17), with self-reports of poor or fair financial status (22 vs 15) and poor health status (52 vs 17). Mothers with activity limitations because of illness had significantly higher PSI scores (34 vs 18). Multiple regression analyses con-firmed the independent relationships of these maternal characteristics to high PSI scores.

Conclusions. Depressive symptoms in inner-city mothers of young children are common. In this popula-tion of women with many risk factors, tradipopula-tional socio-demographic risk factors did not successfully identify those who are depressed. However, mothers’ self-reports of poor financial status, health status, or activity limita-tion because of illness were associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms. These findings may assist cli-nicians in distinguishing which mothers are likely to be depressed when almost all are at high risk. Pediatrics 1998;102:1394 –1400;depression, screening, mothers.

ABBREVIATION. PSI, Psychiatric Symptom Index.

D

epression and depressive disorders are

among the most prevalent mental health problems in the United States.1,2Between 2%

and 8% of patients in primary care settings have major depression, according to studies based on screening tools and structured psychiatric inter-views.3,4 Women have higher rates of depressive

symptoms than men in both population-based1and

clinically-based studies.5 This increased risk among

women persists across cultures, races, and socioeco-nomic levels.6

Being the mother of young children places a woman at particular risk for depression and depres-sive symptoms.5,7–11 Maternal depression has been

found in a variety of pediatric practice settings at rates of 12% to 47%7,8,10,12,13 and is exacerbated by

having either several young children or a child with a chronic illness in the household.10,11,14 Other risk

factors known to increase vulnerability for depres-sive symptoms include inner-city residence, poverty and low socioeconomic status, unemployment, and lower levels of education.15–19

Despite the high prevalence, depressive symptoms in women are often unrecognized and untreated.20 –27

As a result, women can experience significant psy-chologic, social, and occupational disability.28 –31

De-pressive symptoms in mothers of young children also place children at risk for developmental, behav-ioral, and emotional problems.32–36 Therefore, it is

important for pediatricians and other pediatric health care providers to recognize mothers with de-pressive symptoms and children at risk.

Maternal depression is associated with a number of negative consequences for children of all ages. Punitive attitudes toward child rearing,37,38

inaccu-rate knowledge of child development,13 and more

negative, unsupportive, or intrusive parent-child in-teractions39have been noted in mothers with

depres-sive symptoms. Field et al40 found that infants of

depressed mothers as young as 3 months of age were less responsive in interactions with both their own mothers and nondepressed strangers. Preschool chil-dren have also shown increased behavioral problems such as hostility and anxiety at home and at school41

and deviant cognitive and linguistic development.42

In a group of preschool children of inner-city minor-ity adolescent mothers, Leadbeater and Bishop43

found a strong association between maternal

depres-From the *Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; and the ‡Department of Neurology, New York Univer-sity, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York.

This work was presented in part at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Ambu-latory Pediatric Association, Washington, DC, May 3, 1997.

Received for publication Oct 24, 1997; accepted Jul 1, 1998.

(2)

sive symptoms and child behavioral problems. Fi-nally, older children and adolescents of depressed mothers are more likely to experience depression, substance abuse, and conduct disorder during their adolescence than children in comparison samples.34 –36,44 – 46

Given the negative consequences of depressive symptoms for both mothers and their children, pe-diatricians need to be able to recognize maternal depression. A particular problem exists in applying traditional risk factors to certain high-risk popula-tions in which these risk factors may be almost uni-versal. In this study, we explored rates of depressive symptoms in such a high-risk group of women— inner-city mothers of young children. Most women in this group have characteristics known to be asso-ciated with high rates of depressive symptoms; therefore, well-known, traditional risk factors may not be useful to identify those mothers at risk. We sought, therefore, to identify maternal characteristics associated with high levels of depressive symptoms within this already high-risk sample of women.

METHODS Study Design

A cross-sectional survey that included both a maternal inter-view and a self-report checklist of psychiatric symptoms was conducted during the months of June through August in both 1995 and 1996. The study was conducted at a hospital-based, inner-city, general pediatric clinic that has;30 000 primary care visits per year. English-speaking mothers were eligible to participate in the study if they were the biologic mothers of children aged 6 months to 3 years who were attending a well-child health visit. Mothers of children of this age group were selected because they come fre-quently for preventive health care for their children, and have been the group previously studied by other investigators.7–11The

well-child visit was selected to minimize any potential maternal distress that may be associated with coping with an acutely ill child. Furthermore, mothers of acutely ill children may be dis-tracted and concerned primarily with relief for their ill child, and may not cooperate as attentively as mothers whose children are well. Mothers were approached by trained interviewers while waiting to see their child’s pediatric health care provider and asked to participate in the study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained fol-lowing the guidelines of our institution. This study did not exam-ine mothers with primary languages other than English; however, previous authors have shown that rates of depressive symptoms in other cultural groups such as Hispanic women may be even higher.47,48

Measures

The maternal interview included questions about sociodemo-graphic characteristics, mother’s health, and financial status. So-ciodemographic characteristics ascertained included age, marital status, ethnic background, languages spoken, birthplace, educa-tional level, employment and income status, and household com-position. To determine health status, mothers were asked whether they had any ongoing health conditions or any activity they could not do because of their health. In addition, they were asked to compare their health with other people their age on a 5-point scale (excellent to poor). Mothers also were asked to describe their financial situation on a 5-point scale (very good to very poor). Finally, mothers were asked a global question about their happi-ness.

Mothers self-completed the Psychiatric Symptom Index (PSI),49

a 29-item scale that was developed on a community sample of 2299 men and women. The PSI provides a total symptom score as well as subscale scores on four dimensions (depression, anxiety, anger, and cognitive disturbance). Internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity have been well established.49The item

content of the PSI has been compared with two narrow-band instruments for depression and anxiety, the Center for Epidemi-ologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)50and the State-Trait

Anx-iety Inventory,51and was found to have comparable content

va-lidity to these instruments in meeting a majority of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association-IV (DSM-IV) criteria for major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.52

The PSI has been found to be valid and reliable in a multiethnic, disadvantaged, urban population.53 Cross-cultural reliability of

the PSI has been tested on the subscales separately and on the total score in Puerto Rican and African-American mothers of inner-city populations.54Other studies have also used the PSI successfully

with urban, minority populations, including mothers of ill chil-dren.55

The PSI contains items that measure the frequency of symp-toms experienced during the past 2 weeks from “never” to “very often.” Examples include: “How often did you . . . have trouble concentrating, notice your hands trembling, feel fearful or afraid, or feel downhearted or blue?” PSI items are scored using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) with the total score and subscales calculated as a percentage of the total possible score. A total score of$20 repre-sents high levels of symptoms.49 Scores $30 strongly suggest

major depression; Bauman56found a sensitivity of 90% and

spec-ificity of 58% against the section on Major Depression within the Diagnostic Interview Schedule57using this cutoff.

Data Analysis

The relationships of mothers’ PSI total scores to sociodemo-graphic characteristics, health status ratings, financial status rat-ings, and global assessments were examined using one-way anal-ysis of variance with Student-Newman-Keuls tests used for post hoc comparisons as needed. Three separate analyses then were conducted to determine the independent contributions of socio-demographic and other variables to maternal PSI scores. First, two-step hierarchical regression was performed to determine which variables predicted mothers’ mean PSI total scores. Next, logistic regression was performed to assess whether the same variables could independently predict which mothers would have PSI scores at or greater than a clinically important cutoff of 30. Finally, a discriminant function analysis was conducted to assess how sensitive maternal sociodemographic and other variables were at classifying mothers with PSI total scores$30 or,30.

RESULTS

Of 304 eligible mothers who were asked to partic-ipate, 279 (92%) agreed. Of the 279 respondents, 86% self-administered the PSI and 14% required minimal assistance to complete the measure. Mean PSI total scores did not differ by administration method (self-administered versus assisted).

Sample Characteristics

Sociodemographic characteristics are shown in the first column of Table 1. Mothers ranged in age from 14 to 48 years (mean, 27 years). Most were unmarried (71%) and almost one-third lived alone with their children. Forty-two percent of mothers were His-panic, 40% were black, 9% were white, and the re-mainder (10%) were mixed or other races. Forty-eight percent of mothers were born outside the continental United States, including 9% who were born in Puerto Rico. The average grade level com-pleted was grade 12 (range, 5th–17th). English was the primary language for 56% of mothers.

(3)

that their financial situation was “fair,” “poor,” or “very poor.” When asked about their health, 7% of mothers reported that their health was “poor” or “fair” compared with 29% who stated that their health was “good” and 63% who stated their health was “very good” or “excellent.” Twenty-four percent of mothers had a chronic medical condition; 6% re-ported one or more activity limitations because of an illness or medical condition. When asked a global question about how happy they were, 8% of mothers responded that they were “not happy,” 54% were “pretty happy,” and 38% were “very happy.”

Depressive Symptoms

The mean PSI total score was 19 (range, 0 –75). Thirty-nine percent of mothers scored$20, and 18% had PSI total scores of$30. Anxiety and depression subscales were highly correlated with PSI total scores (0.8 and 0.9, respectively).

The second and third columns of Table 1 show PSI total scores by maternal sociodemographic characteris-tics. The results are reported both as the mean PSI total score for each type of maternal characteristic and as the proportion of mothers within each group with PSI total scores that reflected high symptom levels ($30). Al-though the PSI is not intended to yield or imply a psychiatric diagnosis, we determined the proportion of mothers in each group who had PSI scores$30 as one way to address the clinical significance of the associa-tion between distress and particular maternal sociode-mographic characteristics.

Within this sample, mean PSI total scores did not

vary significantly by most sociodemographic character-istics including race, birthplace, marital status, age, ed-ucational level, employment status, or family compo-sition. Although educational level was not significantly related to mean PSI total score, a significantly larger proportion of mothers with less than a high school education had PSI scores $30 (P , .05). Also, more mothers who were previously married (divorced or separated) had PSI scores $30 when compared with other mothers, but the difference was not statistically significant (P ,.10), possibly as a result of the small number of mothers in the previously married group.

As shown in Table 2, there were significant relation-ships between maternal self-reports of financial status, health status, and global well-being and their PSI total scores. Mean PSI total scores were significantly higher among mothers receiving public assistance than those who were not (21 vs 17,P,.05). In addition, a signif-icantly larger proportion of mothers receiving public assistance had PSI total scores $30. Mothers who re-ported good or very good financial status had lower mean PSI total scores than those who reported very poor to fair financial status (15 vs 22, P,.005). Like-wise, a larger proportion of mothers who reported poor to fair financial status had PSI total scores$30.

Mothers with self-reports of poor health status had extremely high mean PSI total scores (52, P,.005). As reported health status improved, mean PSI total scores decreased. The proportions of mothers with PSI total scores $30 also increased significantly as reported health status declined from excellent to poor. Mothers who reported activity limitations be-cause of illness had significantly higher PSI total scores than did mothers with conditions but no ac-tivity limitations or mothers who were healthy (34 vs 21 vs 18, P , .005), and a larger proportion of this group also had PSI total scores$30.

In terms of their global happiness, mothers who reported being “not happy” had much higher PSI total scores than those who reported being “pretty happy” or “very happy” (31 vs 20 vs 15,P,.005). In addition, half of mothers who reported being “not happy” had PSI total scores$30.

Based on significant bivariate relationships, we conducted a two-step hierarchical linear regression to determine the independent relationships of moth-ers’ ratings of their health, financial status, and global happiness to PSI total score controlling for sociodemographic factors (Table 3). In the first step, we entered the six sociodemographic factors that either demonstrated trends in their association to or had statistically significant relationships with mater-nal symptoms (black race, mother living alone with children, on public assistance, born in the United States, having less than a high school education, or having been previously married) as a block and found that none of these factors significantly pre-dicted mothers’ PSI total scores. In Step 2, we entered four maternal self-reported variables (fair/poor fi-nancial status, not happy, medical condition with activity limitation, and poor/fair/good health sta-tus) that had had significant bivariate associations with PSI score. Three of the four maternal self-reported status variables (financial status, global TABLE 1. Mean PSI Scores by Sociodemographic

Character-istics of Mothers (n5279)

Characteristics Mothers,

n(%)

Mean PSI Total Score

Mothers With PSI Total Score

$30,n(%) Age, y

,20 26 (9) 23 4 (15)

20–29 145 (52) 19 24 (17)

30–39 96 (35) 19 17 (18)

.40 12 (4) 23 4 (33)

Education

,High school 90 (32) 21 23 (26)*

High school 103 (37) 18 13 (13)

.High school 86 (31) 19 13 (15)

Birthplace

United States 146 (52) 20 28 (19)

Foreign country 133 (48) 18 21 (16) Race

Hispanic 116 (42) 20 26 (22)

Black 111 (40) 17 13 (12)

White 24 (9) 23 5 (21)

Mixed/other 28 (10) 20 5 (18)

Marital status

Married 81 (29) 18 10 (12)

Living with partner 38 (14) 18 6 (16) Single, never married 128 (46) 19 24 (19)

Separated 27 (10) 21 7 (26)

Divorced 4 (1) 31 2 (50)

Family composition

Both biologic parents 108 (39) 17 15 (14)

Mother alone 87 (31) 21 20 (23)

Mother with partner 5 (2) 19 1 (20) Mother with other adult 78 (28) 18 31 (17)

(4)

happiness, and activity limitation) uniquely contrib-uted to the overall prediction (P values ,.05). The relationship of poor/fair/good health status was borderline (P5.07). The overall variance accounted for by the maternal self-reported status was signifi-cant (adjustedR25 0.16,P, .0001).

To determine if the same maternal characteristics could predict the presence of very high levels of ma-ternal symptoms, or PSI$30, we next performed logis-tic regression (Table 4). Using the same sociodemo-graphic variables in the first step as were used in the linear regression, we found that none was significant in predicting the presence of a PSI total score$30. When we entered the same four maternal self-reported status variables either as forced entry or stepwise entry, we

found that fair/poor financial status, poor/fair/good health status, and a global assessment of being not happy each contributed significantly and uniquely in the model to predict which mothers had PSI total scores$30 (P,.05). In this analysis, having an activity limitation did not significantly predict PSI total score

$30, possibly because of the small number of mothers in that group.

Finally, a discriminant function analysis was per-formed. Using the same sociodemographic and self-reported variables, we found that sociodemographic characteristics alone correctly classified 56% of moth-ers as having PSI total scores $30 or ,30. When mother’s self-reported status variables (fair/poor fi-nancial status, not happy, medical condition with activity limitation, and poor/fair/good health sta-tus) were added to the sociodemographic variables, 73% of mothers were correctly classified. However, the four self-reported status variables did as well in correctly classifying mothers when used alone (74%). This suggests that sociodemographic characteristics in this sample were of no added benefit in predicting maternal PSI total scores.

DISCUSSION

Depressive symptoms in this sample of inner-city mothers of young children were common, with al-most 40% of mothers showing high levels of symp-toms on the PSI using a cutoff score of 20 or more. Furthermore, a substantial percentage of mothers (18%) scored $30, suggesting the presence of major depressive disorder in a large number of mothers. The mean PSI total score of 19 in this population was TABLE 2. Mean PSI Scores by Self-reported Characteristics of Mothers (n5279)

Characteristics Mothers,n(%) Mean PSI

Total Score

Mothers With PSI Total Score$30,

n(%)

Financial status Employment status

Never worked 76 (27) 19 15 (20)

Currently work 67 (24) 18 9 (13)

Not working now 136 (49) 19 25 (18)

Source of household income

On public assistance 159 (57) 21* 35 (22)*

Not on public assistance 118 (43) 17 14 (12)

Reported financial status

Very good/good 101 (37) 15† 10 (10)†

Fair 127 (47) 21 25 (20)

Poor/very poor 42 (16) 22 12 (29)

Health status

Reported health status

Excellent 74 (26) 16† 8 (11)†

Very good 102 (37) 18 12 (12)

Good 81 (29) 21 20 (25)

Fair 18 (6) 24 5 (28)

Poor 4 (1) 52 4 (100)

Medical condition with activity limitation

No condition 213 (76) 18† 30 (14)†

Not limited 51 (18) 21 12 (24)

Limited 15 (5) 34 7 (47)

Global assessment How happy are you

Very happy 106 (38) 15† 15 (14)†

Pretty happy 151 (54) 20 23 (15)

Not happy 22 (8) 31 11 (50)

*P,.05. †P,.005.

TABLE 3. Linear Regression Analysis: Predictors of PSI Score

b P

Step 1: Sociodemographic factors*

Black race 20.057 NS

Mother alone 0.046 NS

On public assistance 0.102 NS

Born in United States 0.055 NS

Less than high school education 0.053 NS

Separated/divorced 0.060 NS

Step 2: Maternal self-reported status variables†

Fair/poor financial status 0.219 P,.0001

Not happy 0.193 P,.001

Medical condition with activity limitation

0.166 P,.005

Poor/fair/poor health status 0.107 P,.07 *R50.18,R250.03, adjustedR250.01, NS (not significant).

(5)

also higher than that found by Ilfeld (mean, 10.5).49

These findings are consistent with other investiga-tors who have found high rates of depressive symp-toms among mothers in the inner city.8,10,13

As we hypothesized, sociodemographic factors that have been identified as risk factors for depres-sive symptoms by other investigators were not use-ful in this relatively homogeneous sample of high-risk women to detect mothers with high levels of depressive symptoms. With the exceptions of having less than a high school education and receiving pub-lic assistance, sociodemographic factors alone were not helpful in predicting which mothers were at risk for high levels of depressive symptoms. However, a number of easily assessed maternal factors were as-sociated with higher PSI scores. These included mothers’ self-report of poor or fair financial status; poor, fair, or good health status; or activity limitation because of illness. In addition, mothers who re-sponded negatively to a global question asking how happy they were had higher PSI scores than those who responded positively. Within this inner-city population, these self-reported factors were signifi-cant predictors independent of mothers’ sociodemo-graphic characteristics, and, in fact, did as well when used alone to correctly classify mothers as having PSI total scores$30 or,30.

In populations of inner-city mothers where there may be little variation among sociodemographic characteristics, asking a few simple questions may enable pediatric health care providers to identify mothers with high levels of depressive symptoms. First, pediatricians can and should ask questions about financial status to identify mothers at risk. Self-reported financial status may reflect mothers’ level of financial stress. Two additional questions that may reflect financial stress in our study were also significantly associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms: having less than a high school education and receiving public assistance. Second, pediatricians can ask about mothers’ health status. The Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR) Depression Guideline Panel noted that many general medical conditions are risk factors for

major depression.58Therefore, mothers with medical

conditions, particularly those with activity limita-tions, are at higher risk for depressive symptoms. Although the PSI and other screening checklists con-tain items that reflect physiologic as well as psycho-logic symptoms, Ilfeld59found that when the

depres-sion and anxiety items of the PSI are divided into a psychologic symptom scale and a physiologic symp-tom scale, sociodemographic factors relate to psycho-logic and physiopsycho-logic symptoms equally. Our find-ings were similar. Mothers with activity limitations because of illness had higher PSI total scores than those without medical conditions when psychologic items and physiologic items were scored separately. This suggests that the PSI measures psychologic dis-tress, although it contains items that reflect physio-logic and somatic complaints. In addition, the higher scores of mothers with medical conditions are not simply because of elevated somatic symptoms.

Finally, asking mothers a global question like, “How are things going for you?” proved helpful in identifying mothers with high levels of depressive symptoms. Not only can this nonthreatening, infor-mative question build rapport, but, when asked in the context of child-centered health care, may also provide pediatricians with extremely useful informa-tion about a mother’s mental health and well-being. Depression among mothers is common and may negatively affect children, but many mothers fail to be identified as having a disorder through their own use of medical care services.20–21 Therefore, they are

un-likely to receive mental health treatment. However, most mothers do bring their young infants and tod-dlers for pediatric care on a regular basis. The Ameri-can Academy of Pediatrics recommends 12 visits for children in the first 3 years of life.60Therefore, pediatric

primary care visits may provide a strategic opportunity to identify mothers with symptoms of depression. In addition, pediatricians are motivated to identify psy-chologic problems in mothers because they are aware of the impact these problems may have on children. As Zuckerman and Beardslee61stated, “After pregnancy,

the pediatric primary care system may represent the only health system in which parents are consistently TABLE 4. Logistic Regression: PSI$30 by Selected Maternal Characteristics

Regression Coefficient

Partial Coefficient

Odds Ratio

P

value

Step 1: Sociodemographic factors*

Black race 20.457 0.000 0.633 NS

Mother alone 0.296 0.000 1.344 NS

On public assistance 0.529 0.020 1.697 NS

Born in United States 0.072 0.000 1.075 NS

Less than high school education 0.516 0.033 1.675 NS

Separted/divorced 0.409 0.000 1.506 NS

Step 2: Sociodemographic factors and Maternal self-reported status variables

Black race 2.0434 0.000 0.648 NS

Mother alone 0.615 0.000 1.312 NS

On public assistance 0.348 0.000 1.416 NS

Born in United States 0.272 0.000 1.312 NS

Less than high school education 0.533 0.013 1.703 NS

Separated/divorced 0.145 0.000 1.850 NS

Fair/poor financial status 0.882 0.108 2.415 ,.05

Not happy 1.523 0.161 4.586 ,.005

Medical condition with activity limitation 0.494 0.000 1.639 NS

(6)

involved and provides a window of opportunity to address their health.”

Because pediatricians develop an ongoing rela-tionship with mothers and discuss various stresses experienced in parenting children, pediatricians may be in an excellent position to identify mothers al-ready having or at risk for depressive symptoms and disorders. Women who may not have a primary health care provider of their own, or who may not feel comfortable discussing their concerns with their own physician, may be more inclined to openly dis-cuss problems that affect their children, such as de-pressive symptoms, with pediatricians. Simonian et al62 noted that screening for adult mental health

problems and family stresses is a promising avenue by which primary care pediatric providers can in-crease their effectiveness at dealing with and pre-venting childhood problems. Healthy Children 200063also calls for increasing the number of

“prima-ry care providers who include in their clinical prac-tices assessment of cognitive, emotional, and parent-child functioning, with appropriate counseling, referral, and follow-up.”

Further study is needed to explore the best ways to help pediatricians recognize mothers at risk for depres-sive symptoms. We found that by asking mothers just a few simple questions about their current financial status, health status, and global well-being, pediatri-cians could learn a great deal about a mother’s poten-tial risk. As demonstrated in the discriminant function analysis, these four maternal self-reported status ques-tions can be used to correctly classify three-quarters of mothers who may be at risk. These questions do not add additional time to a primary care encounter, yet are quite informative. With only slightly more effort, a screening tool such as the PSI is also quite useful to pediatricians in identifying mothers who are experienc-ing elevations in depressive symptoms. Other investi-gators also have advocated using brief screening tools in pediatric settings to identify families at high risk for a number of psychosocial problems including depres-sion, domestic violence, substance abuse, and home-lessness.10,64–66Because depressive symptoms correlate

with other forms of psychopathology, particularly anx-iety, many validated measures are currently available to assess depressive symptoms, such as the CES-D50

and the BDI,67and a wider array of psychopathology,

such as the PRIME-MD.68

The PSI has been shown to have good sensitivity and specificity against a well-validated diagnostic psychiatric interview in the diagnosis of major de-pressive disorder. However, we believe that it is important to identify women with high levels of depressive symptoms that do not qualify for a diag-nostic label. The presence of depressive symptoms even without a clinical diagnosis of depression may contribute significantly to poor child outcomes such as behavioral problems.41,66,69 In addition, Brown et

al70 showed that both chronic and severe life stress

with subclinical symptoms may be important con-tributors to the development of depressive disorders. Furthermore, interventions to prevent the progres-sion of depressive symptoms into an episode of

ma-jor depressive disorder are currently available and have been found to be effective in some patients.71

The findings from this study indicate that screen-ing for maternal depressive symptoms in a pediatric primary care setting is feasible. Given the magnitude of the problem in this population, we believe that screening inner-city mothers is also necessary. Rec-ognizing the problem is the first step, however, and should be done in the context of available treatment services for mothers. Because effective treatment strategies exist for depression and depressive symp-toms,72,73pediatricians can be a valuable resource to

mothers and children if they are willing and pre-pared to refer mothers who may need further eval-uation and treatment. Although many pediatricians may not feel either willing or prepared to recognize maternal depressive symptoms, we assert that ma-ternal mental health directly affects children and is an important consideration for health care providers of children. Additional research to assess pediatri-cians’ awareness of the presence of depressive symp-toms in mothers of their patients, as well as mothers’ and pediatricians’ willingness to discuss depressive symptoms in the context of health care for children, is certainly needed. Ultimately, we aim to develop effective ways for pediatricians to identify and ad-dress this prevalent problem that has profound ef-fects for children and mothers alike.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and the Jacobi Medical Center for their cooperation.

REFERENCES

1. Weissman MM, Bruce ML, Leaf PJ, Florio LP, Holzer C. Affective disorders. In: Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric Disorders in America: The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study.New York, NY: Free Press; 1991:53– 80

2. Regier DA, Boyd JH, Burke JD, et al. One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1988;45:977–986 3. Katon W, Schulberg H. Epidemiology of depression in primary care.

Gen Hosp Psychiatry.1992;14:237–247

4. Schulberg HC, Burns BJ. Mental disorders in primary care: epidemio-logic, diagnostic, and treatment research directions.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1988;10:79 – 87

5. Parker G, Holmes S, Manicavasagar V. Depression in general practice attenders: caseness, natural history, and predictors of outcome.J Affect Disord.1986;10:27–35

6. McGrath E, Keita GP, Stich BR, Russo NF.Women and Depression: Risk Factors and Treatment Issues.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1990

7. Olson AL, DiBrigida LA. Depressive symptoms and work role satisfac-tion in mothers of toddlers.Pediatrics.1994;94:363–367

8. Hall LA, Williams CA, Greenberg RS. Supports, stressors, and depres-sive symptoms in low-income mothers of young children.Am J Public Health.1985;75:518 –522

9. Orr ST, James S. Maternal depression in an urban pediatric practice: implications for health care delivery.Am J Public Health.1984;74:363–365 10. Orr ST, James SA, Burns BJ, Thompson B. Chronic stressors and mater-nal depression: implications for prevention.Am J Public Health.1989;79: 1295–1296

11. Brown G, Harris T.The Social Origins of Depression. New York, NY: Free Press; 1978

12. Kemper KJ. Self-administered questionnaire for structured psychosocial screening in pediatrics.Pediatrics.1992;89:433– 436

13. Reis J. Correlates of depression according to maternal age. J Genet Psychol.1988;149:535–545

14. Ilfeld FW. Current social stressors and symptoms of depression.Am J Psychiatry.1977;134:161–166

(7)

16. Belle D. Poverty and women’s mental health. Am Psychol. 1990;45: 385–389

17. Ross CE, Huber J. Hardship and depression.J Health Soc Behav.1985; 26:312–327

18. Holzer CE, Shea BM, Swanson JW, et al. The increased risk for specific psychiatric disorders among persons of low socioeconomic status.Am J Soc Psychiatry.1986;4:259 –271

19. Comstock GW, Helsing KJ. Symptoms of depression in two communi-ties.Psychol Med.1976;6:551–563

20. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheied RW, Locke BZ, Good-win FK. The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Arch Gen Psychiatry.1993;50:85–94

21. Robins LN, Locke BZ, Regier DA. An overview of psychiatric disorders in America. In: Robins LN, Regier DA, eds.Psychiatric Disorders in America. The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study.New York, NY: Free Press; 1991:328 –366

22. Alegria M, Robles R, Freeman DH, et al. Patterns of mental health utilization among island Puerto Rican poor.Am J Public Health.1991; 81:875– 879.

23. Temkin-Greener H, Clark KT. Ethnicity, gender, and utilization of mental health services in a Medicaid population.Soc Sci Med.1988;26: 989 –996

24. Burns BJ, Burke JD. Improving mental health practice in primary care: findings from recent research.Public Health Rep.1985;100:194 –200 25. Perez-Stable DJ, Miranda J, Munoz RF, Ying YW. Depression in medical

outpatients.Arch Intern Med.1990;150:1083–1088

26. Schulberg HC, Saul M, McClelland M, Ganguli M, Christy W, Frank R. Assessing depression in primary medical and psychiatric practices.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1985;42:1164 –1170

27. VonKorff M, Shapiro S, Burke JD, et al. Anxiety and depression in a primary care clinic.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1987;44:152–156

28. Johnson J, Weissman MM, Klerman GL. Service utilization and social morbidity associated with depressive symptoms in the community. JAMA.1992;267:478 – 483

29. VonKorff M, Ormel J, Katon W, Lin EHB. Disability and depression among high utilizers of health care: a longitudinal analysis.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1992;49:91–100

30. Wells KB, Golding JM, Burnam MA. Psychiatric disorders and limita-tions in physical functioning in a sample of the Los Angeles general population.Am J Psychiatry.1988;145:712–717

31. Mintz J, Mintz LI, Arruda MJ, Hwang SS. Treatments of depression and the functional capacity to work.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1992;49:761–768 32. Beardslee WR, Bemporad J, Keller MB, Klerman GL. Children of parents

with major affective disorder: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140: 825– 832

33. Richman N. Depression in mothers of preschool children.J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1976;17:75–78

34. Weissman MM, Prusoff BA, Gammon GD, Merikangas KR, Leckman JF, Kidd KK. Psychopathology in the children (ages 6 –18) of depressed and normal parents.J Am Acad Child Psychiatry.1984;23:78 – 84

35. Weissman MM, John K, Merikangas KR, et al. Depressed parents and their children: general health, social, and psychiatric problems.Am J Dis Child.1986;140:801– 805

36. Weissman MM, Gammon GD, John K, et al. Children of depressed parents: increased psychopathology and early onset of major depres-sion.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1987;44:847– 853

37. Cohen P, Brook JS, Cohen J, Velez CN, Garcia M. Common and uncom-mon pathways to adolescent psychopathology and problem behavior. In: Robins LN, Rutter M, eds.Straight and Devious Pathways From Child-hood to AdultChild-hood.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1990: 242–258

38. Fendrich M, Warner V, Weissman MM. Family risk factors, parental de-pression, and psychopathology in offspring.Dev Psychol.1990;26:40–50 39. Cummings E, Davies P. Maternal depression and child development.

J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1994;35:73–112

40. Field T, Healy B, Goldstein S, et al. Infants of depressed mothers show depressed behavior even with non-depressed adults.Child Dev.1988; 59:1569 –1579

41. Alpern L, Lyons-Ruth K. Preschool children at social risk: chronicity and timing of maternal depressive symptoms and child behavior prob-lems at school and at home.Dev Psychopathol.1993;5:371–387 42. Coghill SR, Caplan HL, Alexandra H, Robson K, Kumar R. Impact of

maternal post-natal depression on cognitive development of young children.Br Med J.1986;292:1165–1167

43. Leadbeater BJ, Bishop SJ. Predictors of behavior problems in preschool children of inner-city Afro-American and Puerto Rican adolescent mothers.Child Dev.1994;65:638 – 648

44. Beardslee WR, Wheelock I. Children of parents with affective disorders: empirical findings and clinical implications. In: Reynolds WM, Johnston HF, eds.Handbook of Depression in Children and Adolescents.New York, NY: Plenum; 1994:463– 479

45. Downey G, Coyne JC. Children of depressed parents: an integrative review.Psychol Bull.1990;108:50 –76

46. Schwartz CE, Dorer DJ, Beardslee WR, Lavori PW, Keller MB. Maternal expressed emotion and parental affective disorder: risk for childhood depressive disorder, substance abuse, or conduct disorder.J Psychiatr Res.1990;24:231–250

47. Escobar JI. Cross-cultural aspects of the somatization trait.Hosp Com-munity Psychiatry.1987;38:174 –180

48. Mukherjee S, Shukla SS, Weedle J, et al. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in bipolar patients: a multi-ethnic comparison.Am J Psychiatry.1983; 140:1571–1574

49. Ilfeld FW. Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population.Psychol Rep.1976;39:1215–1228

50. Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population.Applied Psychological Measurement.1977;1:385–401 51. Spielberger CD.Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children.

Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1973

52. Okun A, Stein REK, Bauman LJ, Silver EJ. Content validity of the Psychiatric Symptom Index, CES-Depression Scale, and State-trait Anxiety Inventory from the perspective of DSM-IV.Psychol Rep.1996; 79:1059 –1069

53. Stein REK, Jessop DJ. Does pediatric home care make a difference for children with chronic illness? Findings from the Pediatric Ambulatory Care Treatment Study.Pediatrics.1984;73:848 – 853

54. Stein REK, Jessop DJ. Measuring health variables among Hispanic and Non-hispanic children with chronic conditions.Public Health Rep.1989; 104:377–384

55. Silver EJ, Ireys HT, Bauman LJ, Stein REK. Psychosocial outcomes of a support intervention in mothers of children with ongoing health conditions: the Parent-to Parent Network.J Community Psychol.1997;25: 249 –264

56. Bauman LJ. Mental health of inner-city mothers of children with chronic conditions.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1994;48:37

57. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Cottler L, Goldring E.The Diagnostic Interview Schedule Version III-R. St Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine; 1989

58. AHCPR Depression Guideline Panel.Depression in Primary Care: I. De-tection and Diagnosis: Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 5. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993. AHCPR Publication No. 93– 0550 59. Ilfeld FW. Psychologic status of community residents along major

demographic dimensions.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1978;35:716 –724 60. Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy

of Pediatrics. Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Pediatrics.1995;96:373–374

61. Zuckerman BS, Beardslee WR. Maternal depression: a concern for pe-diatricians.Pediatrics.1987;79:110 –117

62. Simonian SJ, Tarnowski KJ, Stancin T, Friman PC, Atkins MS. Disad-vantaged children and families in pediatric primary care settings: II. Screening for behavior disturbance.J Clin Child Psychol.1991;20:360 –371 63. US Department of Health and Human Services.Healthy Children 2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1991: 78 –79

64. Kemper KJ, Kelleher KJ. Rationale for family psychosocial screening. Ambulatory Child Health.1996;1:311–324

65. Kemper KJ, Kelleher KJ. Family psychosocial screening: instruments and techniques.Ambulatory Child Health.1996;1:325–339

66. Hall LE, Farel AM. Maternal stresses and depressive symptoms: corre-lates of behavior problems in young children.Nursing Res. 1988;37: 156 –161

67. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression.Arch Gen Psychiatry.1961;4:561–571

68. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the PRIME-MD 1000 study.JAMA.1994;272:1749 –1756

69. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the medical outcomes study.JAMA. 1989;262:914 –919

70. Brown GW, Bifulco A, Harris T, Bridge L. Life stress, chronic subclinical symptoms and vulnerability to clinical depression.J Affect Disord.1986; 11:1–19

71. Munoz RF, Ying Y, Bernal G, et al. Prevention of depression with primary care patients: a randomized control trial.Am J Community Psychol.1995;23:199 –222

72. Brown C, Schulberg HC. Depression and anxiety disorders: diagnosis and treatment in primary care practice. In: Gallant SJ, Keita GP, Royak-Schaler R, eds.Health Care for Women: Psychological, Social, and Behavioral Influences. Washington, DC: American Psychologial Association; 1997:237–256 73. AHCPR Depression Guideline Panel.Depression in Primary Care: II.

(8)

DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.6.1394

1998;102;1394

Pediatrics

Ruth E. K. Stein

Amy M. Heneghan, Ellen Johnson Silver, Laurie J. Bauman, Lauren E. Westbrook and

Depressive Symptoms in Inner-city Mothers of Young Children: Who Is at Risk?

Services

Updated Information &

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/6/1394

including high resolution figures, can be found at:

References

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/6/1394#BIBL

This article cites 61 articles, 5 of which you can access for free at:

Subspecialty Collections

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/substance_abuse_sub Substance Use

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/standard_of_care_sub Standard of Care

unication_skills_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/interpersonal_-_comm Interpersonal & Communication Skills

ev_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/teaching_curriculum_d Teaching/Curriculum Development

following collection(s):

This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the

Permissions & Licensing

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml

in its entirety can be found online at:

Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or

Reprints

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

(9)

DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.6.1394

1998;102;1394

Pediatrics

Ruth E. K. Stein

Amy M. Heneghan, Ellen Johnson Silver, Laurie J. Bauman, Lauren E. Westbrook and

Depressive Symptoms in Inner-city Mothers of Young Children: Who Is at Risk?

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/6/1394

located on the World Wide Web at:

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is

by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.

Figure

TABLE 1.Mean PSI Scores by Sociodemographic Character-istics of Mothers (n � 279)
TABLE 3.Linear Regression Analysis: Predictors of PSI Score
TABLE 4.Logistic Regression: PSI �30 by Selected Maternal Characteristics

References

Related documents

Some groups volunteer more frequently—and in different ways than others, due to both individual and institutional barriers (IVR 2006; Sherraden, Lough, and McBride 2008). Knowing

In the study, 8 th grade students were provided with examples from real life situations, and subsequently they were asked to connect these situations with mathematical

Presents the ``TRY'' (test, recalibrate, yes) model to help change leaders' resistance to change and lists what is needed in leaders to increase their ability to manage

To aid the development of a more patient compliant dosage form, a polyclonal antibody that specifically recognises the iron bound form of desferrioxamine was produced

In what follows, I carefully review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis ( TV ): neuropsychological demonstrations that brain damage

In the present study, we re- veal, for what we believe is the first time, that feasible hydrostatic pressure effectively promotes the proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation

LEVIN EPSTEIN: Susan, how do you recommend that some of these best practices be fostered at the same time as the software is really coming on to the market to do just in

Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) Analysis SEM micrographs obtained from unexposed and exposed specimen coupons in Barr’s medium inoculated with Desulfovibrio