• No results found

On the Zeros of a Polynomial inside the Unit Disk

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On the Zeros of a Polynomial inside the Unit Disk"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

e

-ISSN: 2250-3021,

p

-ISSN: 2278-8719

Vol. 3, Issue 1 (Jan. 2013), ||V3|| PP 50-59

On the Zeros of a Polynomial inside the Unit Disk

M. H. Gulzar

Department of Mathematics University of Kashmir, Srinagar 190006

Abstract:In this paper we find an upper bound for the number of zeros of a polynomial inside the unit disk, when the coefficients of the polynomial or their real and imaginary parts are restricted to certain conditions.

Mathematics Subject Classification:30C10, 30C15

Key-words and phrases: Polynomial, Unit disk, Zero.

I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF RESULTS

Regarding the number of zeros of a polynomial inside the unit disk, the following results were recently proved by M. H. Gulzar [2] :

Theorem A: Let P(z)=

n

j j j

z

a

0

be a polynomial of degree n such that for some

0

,

a

n

a

n1

...

a

1

a

0.

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

1

0

z

M

a

does not exceed

0

0 0

2

log

1

log

1

a

a

a

a

a

n

n

,

where

M

1

2

a

n

a

n

a

0.

Theorem B: Let P(z)=

n

j j j

z

a

0

be a polynomial of degree n with complex coefficients .If

,

Re

a

j

j

Im

a

j

j

,

j

0

,

1

,...,

n

,

and for some

0

,

n

n1

...

1

0

,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

,

2

0

z

M

a

does not exceed

, 2

2 log 1 log

1

0

0 0 0

a

n

j j n

n

    

    

where

n

j j n

n

M

1 0

0

2

2

2

.

Theorem C: Let P(z)=

n

j j j

z

a

0

be a polynomial of degree n with complex coefficients .If

,

Re

a

j

j

Im

a

j

j

,

j

0

,

1

,...,

n

,

and for some

0

,

n

n1

...

1

0

,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

,

3

0

z

M

a

(2)

, 2

2 log 1 log

1

0

0 0 0

a

n

j j n

n

    

     

where

    

n

j j n

n M

1 0

0

3 2     2  .

TheoremD. Let P(z)=

n

j j jz a

0

be a polynomial of degree n with complex coefficients such that

argaj    2,j0,1,...n,

 

 for some real

and

0 1 1 ... a a

a

ann   

 

 ,for some

0

.

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in ,0 1,

4

0

z M

a does not exceed

, sin

2 ) 1 sin (cos

) 1 sin )(cos

( log 1 log

1

0

1

1 0

a

a a

a

n

j j

n

 

 

  

     

where

 

 

 

 1

1 0

4 ( )(cos sin 1) (cos sin ) 2sin

n

j j

n a a

a

M      

In this paper, we try to give generalizations of the above results. In fact, we prove the following :

Theorem 1: Let

n

j j jz a z

P

0

)

( be a polynomial of degree n with

Re(

a

j

)

j and

Im(

a

j

)

j, j=0,1,2,……,n. If for some real numbers

,

0

,

1

k

n

,

nk

0

,

nk1

nk

,

0

1

,

n

n1

...

nk1



nk

nk1

...

1



0,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

5

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0

0 2 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

           

,

where

 

       

   

n

j j k

n k

n n

n M

1 0

0 0 0

5 2   ( 1)  1 (  )   2  ,

and if

nk

nk1

,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

6

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0

0 ) 2 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

          

where

 

       

   

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

M

1 0

0 0 0

6 2   (1 ) 1   (  )   2 

Remark 1: Taking

1

,

1

,Theorem 1 reduces to Theorem B.

Taking

1

in Theorem 1, we get the following result:

Corollary 1: Let

n

j j jz

a z

P

0 )

( be a polynomial of degree n with

Re(

a

j

)

j and

Im(

a

j

)

j, j=0,1,2,……,n. If for some real numbers

0

,

0

1

,

(3)

then the number of zeros of P(z) in ,0 1

7

0

z M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0

0 ) 2 2

( 2

log 1 log

1

a

n

j j n

n

  

 

       

,

where

    

 

n

j j n

n

M

1 0

0 0 0

7 2   (  )   2 

Remark 2: If

a

j are real i.e.

j

0

for all j , Theorem 1 gives the following result which reduces to Theorem A by taking

1

,

1

:

Theorem 2: Let

  n j

j jz

a z

P

0 )

( be a polynomial of degree n .If for some real numbers

,

0

,

,

0

,

1

k

n

a

nk

a

nk1

a

nk

,

0

1

,

a

n

a

n1

...

a

nk1

a

nk

a

nk1

...

a

1

a

0,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

8

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0 ) 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

a a

a a

a a

ann   n k   n k   

     

,

where

M

8

2

a

n

a

n

(

1

)

a

nk

1

a

nk

(

a

0

a

0

)

a

0 ,

and if

a

nk

a

nk1

,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

9

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0 ) 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

a a

a a

a a

ann   n k   n k   

     

,

where

M

9

2

a

n

a

n

(

1

)

a

nk

1

a

nk

(

a

0

a

0

)

a

0 .

Applying Theorem 1 to the polynomial –iP(z), we get the following result, which reduces to Theorem C by taking

1

:

Theorem 3: Let

n

j j j

z

a

z

P

0

)

(

be a polynomial of degree n with

Re(

a

j

)

j and

Im(

a

j

)

j, j=0,1,2,……,n. If for some real numbers

,

0

,

1

k

n

,

nk

0

,

nk1

nk

,

0

1

,

n

n1

...

nk1



nk

nk1

...

1

0,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

10

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0 0

0 ) 2 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

           

where

 

       

   

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

M

1 0

0 0 0

10 2   ( 1)  1 (  )   2  ,

and if

nk

nk1

,

then the number of zeros of P(z) in ,0 1 11

0

z M

(4)

, 2

2 ) (

1 )

1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

0

0 0

0 0

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

           

where

. 2

) (

1 )

1 ( 2

1 0

0 0 0

11

 

       

   

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

M              Theore

m 4: Let

n

j j j

z

a

z

P

0

)

(

be a polynomial of degree n .If for some real numbers

0

,

0

,

,

0

,

1

k

n

a

nk

0

1

,

a

n

a

n1

...

a

nk1

a

nk

a

nk1

...

a

1

a

0 ,

and for some real

,

a

j

,

j

0

,

1

,...,

n

2

arg

and

a

nk1

a

nk , i.e.

1

,then the

number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

12

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

, ]

sin 2 2 ) 1 sin (c os

) 1 sin

c os sin

(c os )

1 sin (c os [(

log 1 log

1

0

1

, 1 0

0

a

a a

a

a a

n

k n j j

j k

n n

   

    

  

 

  

 

 

      

 

where

M

12

(

a

n

(cos

sin

1

)

a

nk

(cos

sin

cos

sin

1

)

  

1

, 1 0

0

(cos

sin

1

)

2

sin

n

k n j j

j

a

a

a

and if

a

nk

a

nk1 , i.e.

1

, then the number of zeros of P(z) in

,

0

1

13

0

z

M

a

, does not

exceed

, ]

sin 2 2

) 1 sin (c os

) 1 sin c os

sin (c os

) 1 sin (c os

[(

log 1 log

1

0

1

, 1 0

0

a

a a

a

a a

n

k n j j

j k

n n

   

   

  

 

  

 

 

 

    

 

where

)

1

sin

cos

sin

(cos

)

1

sin

(cos

(

13

a

n

a

nk

M

   

  

 1

, 1 0

0 (cos sin 1) 2sin

n

k n j j

j a a

a   

 .

Remark 4: Taking

1

,

1

, Theorem 4 reduces to Theorem D.

II. LEMMAS

For the proofs of the above results , we need the following results:

Lemma 1: . Let P(z)=

n

j j j

z

a

0

be a polynomial of degree n with complex coefficients such that

for

n

j

a

j

,

0

,

1

,...

,

2

arg

some real

,then for some t>0,

c os

sin .

1 1

1      

ata ata aj

taj j j j j

(5)

Lemma 2.If p(z) is regular ,p(0)

0 and

p

(

z

)

M

in

z

1

,

then the number of zeros of p(z) in

,

1

0

,

z

does not exceed

) 0 ( log 1 log 1 p M  (see[4],p171).

III. PROOFS OF THEOREMS

Proof of Theorem 1: Consider the polynomial

F

(

z

)

(

1

z

)

P

(

z

)

k n k n k n k n k n k n n n n n n n n n n

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

z

a

z

a

z

            

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

...

)(

1

(

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1

(

a

nk1

a

nk2

)

z

nk1

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

a

0

0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

i

z

i

z

z

z

z

z

z

i

n j j j j k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n n n n n n n

                  

If

nk1

nk

,

then

1 1 1

1

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

(

nk

nk nk

n n n n n n

n

i

z

z

z

z

z

F

.

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 1





i

z

i

z

z

z

z

z

n j j j j k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n

             

For

z

1

,

...

)

(

z

n n n 1

F

nk1

nk+



nk

nk1

1

nk

    

n j j k n k n 0 0 0 0 1 2

1

...



(

1

)

2

  

n j j k n k n n n 0 0 0

0

)

2

2

(

1

)

1

(

2

Hence by Lemma 2, the number of zeros of F(z) in

z

,

0

1

, does not exceed

. 2 2 ) ( 1 ) 1 ( 2 log 1 log 1 0 0 0 0 0 a n j j k n k n n n

                        

On the other hand, let

Q(z)=

a

n

z

n1

(

a

n

a

n1

)

z

n

...

(

a

nk1

a

nk

)

z

nk1

(

a

nk

a

nk1

)

z

nk

(

a

n k

a

n k

)

z

n k

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

1

2

1

 

  

For

z

1

,

k n k n k n k n k n n n n

z

Q

(

)

1

...

1



1

1

              n j j k n k 1 0 0 0 1 2

1  ...   (1 )  2 

(6)

5 1

0 0 0

0 ) 2

( 1

) 1 (

2 M

n

j j k

n n

n           

      

  

 

 .

Since Q(0)=0, we have, by Rouche’s theorem,

z

M

z

Q

(

)

5 , for

z

1

. Thus

a

0

Q

(

z

)

a

0

M

5

z

0

if

5 0

M a z  .

This shows that F(z) has no zero in

5 0

M a

z  . Consequently it follows that the number of zeros of F(z) and

hence P(z) in

,

0

1

5

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

. 2

2 ) (

1 )

1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

0

0 0

0 0

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

          

If

nk

nk1

,

then

(

)

(

)

1

(

1

)

...

(

1

)

nk1 k n k

n n

n n n

n n

n

i

z

z

z

z

z

F



.

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

0 1

1

0 0 0

1

1 2 1

1



i

z

i

z

z

z

z

z

n

j

j j j

k n k n k n

k n k n k

n k n k n

 

     

   

  

For

z

1

,

...

)

(

z

n n n 1

F

nk1



nk+

nk

nk1

1

nk

 

 

n

j j k

n k n

0 0

0 0 1

2

1

...

(

)

2

2

 

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

0 0

0

0

)

2

2

(

1

)

1

(

2

Hence by Lemma 2, the number of zeros of F(z) in

z

,

0

1

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0

0 ) 2 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

          

.

On the other hand, let

Q(z)= n k n k n k

k n k n k n n

n n n

n

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

 

(

)

...

(

)

(

1

)

1 1

1 1

(

a

n k

a

n k

)

z

n k

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

1

2

1

 

   

)

(

)

(

z

a

0

Q

z

(7)

 

      

  

  

   

 

n

j

j j j

k n k n k n k

n k n k

n k n k n

k n k n k

n n

n n n

n n n

z

i

z

z

z

z

a

z

z

z

z

z

i

1

1 0

0 1

1 2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(





For

z

1

,

k n k

n k n k n k

n n

n n

z

Q

(

)

1

...

1



1

1

 

 

n

j j k

n k

1 0

0 0 0 1

2

1

...

(

)

2

6 1

0 0 0

0 ) 2

( 1

) 1 (

2 M

n

j j k

n n

n           

      

  

 

 .

Since Q(0)=0, we have, by Rouche’s theorem,

z

M

z

Q

(

)

6 , for

z

1

. Thus

a

0

Q

(

z

)

a

0

M

6

z

0

if

6 0

M

a

z

.

This shows that F(z) has no zero in

6 0

M

a

z

. Consequently it follows that the number of zeros of F(z) and

hence P(z) in

,

0

1

6

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

0

0 0

0

0 ) 2 2

( 1

) 1 ( 2

log 1 log

1

a

n

j j k

n k

n n

n

 

      

  

         

.

That proves Theorem 1.

Proof of Theorem 4: Consider the polynomial

F

(

z

)

(

1

z

)

P

(

z

)

k n k n k n k

n k n k n n

n n n

n

n n n n

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

z

a

z

a

z

    

    

 

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

...

)(

1

(

1 1

1 1

1

0 1 1

1

1 0 0

1 2

1

)

...

(

)

(

a

a

z

n k

a

a

z

a

k n k

n

 

   

If

a

nk1

a

nk , i.e.

1

, then

1 1 1

1

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

nk

nk nkn

n n n

n

n

z

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

z

F

(

a

nk

a

nk1

)

z

nk

(

1

)

a

nk

z

nk

(

a

nk1

a

nk2

)

z

nk1

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

(

1

)

a

0

z

a

0

so that for

z

1

, we have by using Lemma 1,

)

(

)

(

z

a

0

Q

z

(8)

1 1

1

...

)

(

z

a

n

a

n

a

n

a

nk

a

nk

a

nk

a

nk

F

1

a

nk

a

nk1

a

nk2

...

a

1

a

0

1

a

0

a

0

a

n

(

a

n

a

n1

)

cos

(

a

n

a

n1

)

sin

...

0 0 0

1 0

1

2 1

2 1

1 1

1 1

)

1

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

...

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

)

1

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

k n k

n k

n k

n

k n k n k

n k n

k n k

n k

n k

n k

n

  

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

(

a

n

)(cos

sin

1

)

a

nk

(cos

sin

cos

sin

1

)

  

1

, 1 0

0

(cos

sin

1

)

2

2

sin

n

k n j j

j

a

a

a

Hence , by Lemma 2, the number of zeros of F(z) in

z

,

0

1

, does not exceed

0

1

, 1 0

0 (c os sin 1) 2 2sin ]

) 1 sin

c os sin

(c os )

1 sin (c os

[(

log 1 log

1

a

a a

a

a a

n

k n j j

j k

n n

   

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

      

 

On the

other hand, let

Q(z)= n k n k n k

k n k n k n n

n n n

n

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

 

(

)

...

(

)

(

1

)

1 1

1 1

(

a

n k

a

n k

)

z

n k

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

1

2

1

 

   

For

z

1

,

)

(

z

Q

(

a

n

)(cos

sin

1

)

a

nk

(cos

sin

cos

sin

1

)

  

1

, 1 0

0

(cos

sin

1

)

2

sin

n

k n j j

j

a

a

a

M

12.

Since Q(0)=0 , we have , by Rouche’s Theorem,

Q

(

z

)

M

11

z

,

for

z

1

.

Thus, for

z

1

,

)

(

)

(

z

a

0

Q

z

F

a

0

Q

(

z

)

a

0

M

12

z

0

if

.

12 0

M

a

z

This shows that F(z) has all its zeros z with

z

1

in

.

12 0

M

a

z

Thus, the number of zeros of F(z) and hence P(z) in

,

0

1

12

0

z

M

a

(9)

0 1

, 1 0

0 (c os sin 1) 2sin ]

) 1 sin

c os sin

(c os )

1 sin (c os

[(

log 1 log

1

a

a a

a

a a

n

k n j j

j k

n n

   

   

  

 

  

 

 

      

 

If

a

nk

a

nk1 , i.e.

1

, then

(

)

1

(

1

)

...

(

1

)

nk1 k n k

n n

n n n

n

n

z

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

z

F

(

a

nk

a

nk1

)

z

nk

(

1

)

a

nk

z

nk1

(

a

nk1

a

nk2

)

z

nk1

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

(

1

)

a

0

z

a

0

so that for

z

1

, we have by Lemma 1,

1 1

1

...

)

(

z

a

n

a

n

a

n

a

nk

a

nk

a

nk

a

nk

F

1

a

nk

a

nk1

a

nk2

...

a

1

a

0

1

a

0

a

0

a

n

(

a

n

a

n1

)

cos

(

a

n

a

n1

)

sin

...

0 0 0

1 0

1

2 1

2 1

1 1

1 1

) 1 ( sin ) (

c os ) (

... sin

) (

c os ) (

sin ) (

c os ) (

1 sin ) (

c os ) (

a a a

a a

a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a

k n k

n k

n k

n

k n k n k

n k n

k n k

n k

n k

n k

n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(

a

n

)(cos

sin

1

)

a

nk

(cos

sin

cos

sin

1

)

  

1

, 1 0

0

(cos

sin

1

)

2

2

sin

n

k n j j

j

a

a

a

Hence , by Lemma 2, the number of zeros of F(z) in

z

,

0

1

, does not exceed

log

1

log

1

0

1

, 1 0

0(c os sin 1) 2 2sin ]

) 1 sin c os

sin (c os )

1 sin (c os [(

a

a a

a

a a

n

k n j j

j k

n n

   

   

  

 

  

 

 

      

 

On the other hand, let

Q(z)= n k n k n k

k n k n k n n

n n n

n

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

 

(

)

...

(

)

1

(

1

)

1 1

1

(

a

n k

a

n k

)

z

n k

...

(

a

1

a

0

)

z

1

2

1

 

   

For

z

1

, by using Lemma 1,

)

(

z

Q

(

a

n

)(cos

sin

1

)

a

nk

(cos

sin

cos

sin

1

)

  

   

 1

, 1 0

0 (cos sin 1) 2sin

n

k n j j

j a a

a   

M

13.

Since Q(0)=0 , we have , by Rouche’s Theorem, ( ) ,

13 z

M z

Q  for

z

1

.

Thus, for

z

1

,

) ( )

(z a0 Q z

F  

a

0

Q

(

z

)

(10)

0

if

.

13 0

M

a

z

This shows that F(z) has all its zeros z with

z

1

in

.

13 0

M

a

z

Thus, the number of zeros of F(z) and hence P(z) in

,

0

1

13

0

z

M

a

, does not exceed

log

1

log

1

0

1

, 1 0

0(cos sin 1) 2sin ]

) 1 sin cos

sin (cos )

1 sin (cos [(

a

a a

a

a a

n k n j j

j k

n n

    

   

  

 

  

 

 

      

 

.

That proves Theorem 4.

REFERENCES

[1] N.K.Govil and Q.I.Rahman,On the Enestrom-Kakeya Theorem, Tohoku Math.J.20(1968) , 126-136. [2] M. H. Gulzar, On the number of Zeros of a polynomial in a prescribed Region, International journal of

Mathematical Archive-2(9), 2011, 35-46.

References

Related documents

Before you give this tablet, make sure that you tell your pharmacist about ANY other medicines you might be giving your child at the same time, particularly the following: •

We call (ijkl a corank- ) nullity sequence. The lack of like terms to cancel out is a property of the Q-polynomial which we give next. By induction on the cardinality of E. It

The polynomial function of Example 5 has two distinct real zeros, and its factored form contains two distinct linear factors and one irreducible quadratic factor. Theorem

Many participants highlighted that it was their feeling of nervousness affecting them very much while they are presenting. This affects their level of self

However, by identifying the inspectors as street-level bureaucrats (Lipsky, 2010), we take a bottom-up perspective on policy. The four mechanisms described here involve

It was discovered that the level of p-ERK was increased in the SDHB -silenced cells compared to control (Figure 2C), indicating that in- hibition of SDHB expression promoted tumour

First comparisons with the dynamic Smagorinsky model and direct numerical simulations for mean velocity, turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds stress profiles, are shown to be

Muhammad Dede Yusuf, RD Kusumanto, Yurni Oktarina, Tresna Dewi, and Pola Risma BLOB Analysis for Fruit Recognition and Detection The target grasping is made possible by