• No results found

Calculating Economic Damages in a Personal Injury Case. Presented by: Warren M. Johnson, CPA, CFF

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Calculating Economic Damages in a Personal Injury Case. Presented by: Warren M. Johnson, CPA, CFF"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Calculating Economic

Damages in a Personal

Injury Case

Presented by:

(2)

1.

Principles and Methodology

A.

Determining Loss Period

B.

Determining Earning Capacity Absent Injury

I. At time of Incident

II. Post-incident

C.

Determining Mitigation Earning Capacity

D.

Present Value Calculations

2.

Checklists of Data

A.

Actuarial Data

I. Work life expectancy

II. Life expectancy

B.

Inflationary tables

C.

Family History

(3)

1. Evidence of other experts

A. Medical professional

B. Vocational Rehabilitation Expert

C. Determination of Disability by Social Security Administration, etc. (may not always indicate permanent disability)

2. Measuring Work-life for Totally Disabled Plaintiffs

A. Work-life expectancy: by gender, education, industry, profession, pension plan actuarial data

B. Years to retirement or final separation

C. Social Security retirement ages (62, 66, 70)

D. Plaintiff’s intended date of retirement

(4)

1.

Earning Capacity vs. Lost Earnings

2.

Lost Earning Capacity

A.

Determining Earning Capacity at Date of incident

B.

Determining Future Lost Earning Capacity

3.

Mitigation Earning Capacity

A.

Actual if plaintiff is working

B.

Determined by other expert testimony if not

C.

Raises/promotions in new job

(5)

Earning Capacity vs. Lost Earnings

1.

Plaintiff can lose earning capacity even if not employed.

2.

If employed, earning capacity can be measured by actual

earnings at time of event – presumption is average

person chooses to maximize earnings

(6)

Determining Earning Capacity

1. Wages or salary

A. Wage rate/salary at time of incident

B. Wage rate/salary history for five years prior to incident (trend pay increases with consideration of earnings ceiling)

2. Benefits

A. Health – COBRA letter (medical/dental/vision) B. Retirement/savings benefits

C. Defined benefit (pension) vs. defined contribution (401k) D. Social security

E. Other: bonuses, stock options, etc.

3. History of hours worked in career prior to incident: plaintiff’s history or union/industry average annual hours worked

(7)

1.

Likelihood of raises or promotions

A.

Past history of raises

B.

Past history of promotions

2.

Likelihood of layoff

3. Likelihood of change in benefits

(8)

1.

Injury to child, young adult, housewife returning to the

labor force, workers with undocumented earning

history, foreign workers

A.

Education expectations (educational level of parents;

plaintiff’s future plans)

B.

Age/earnings profile data (U.S.)

C.

Wage/hour data for country of origin

D.

Earnings for occupation according to surveys

E.

Testimony

(9)

If person cannot do former job –

1.

Evidence of other experts

A.

Work limitations (medical expert)

B.

Appropriate job (vocational expert)

2.

Salary/wages in mitigation employment

3.

Benefits in mitigation employment

4.

Actual work history since incident

(10)

1. Net Discount Rate: Risk Free Return Divided by Wage Growth Rate [e.g., (1.03 / 1.02) - 1 = 1.0%]

2. The higher the discount rate, the lower the damages. The

present value of damages is generally lower than the total of all future payments (gross value).

3. Consistency is important for an accountant/economist/actuary from case to case

4. Typical wage discount rates are 0% to 3% but in the present

environment can be negative, e.g., -1%, if the wage growth rate exceeds the time value of money (meaning present value is

*higher* than future value)

(11)

1. Net Discount Rate: Risk Free Return Divided by Medical Cost

Inflation Rate [e.g., (1.03 / 1.02) - 1 = 1.0%]; can be negative meaning that future cost increases exceed the time value of money.

2. Medical cost escalation measured historically by indices for various categories of medical expenses, e.g., medical commodities;

physician services.

3. Defense may want to introduce evidence of amounts paid by insurance or typically paid rather than fee for service rates for medical expenses.

4. Care costs may be reported by vocational expert or life care planner in conjunction with treating physicians or medical experts.

5. Wage loss for time spent undergoing and recovering from future medical procedures may also need to be valued.

Measuring and Discounting to Present

Value: Future Medical Expenses

(12)

1.

Defense may elect not to present an opposing expert

under the theory that this suggests there

*are*

damages

(but it may be prudent for defense to hire an economist to

consult with and have in reserve – otherwise the only

damage calculation presented is the plaintiff’s)

2.

Opposing side may overreach: need to show what is

most reasonable/probable and why

(13)

1. Social Security Itemized Statement of Earnings (Plaintiff can request from SSA)

2. Form 1040 Tax Returns (privileged) (Plaintiff can request from IRS)

3. Subpoenaed personnel and payroll records from former and current employers: 5 Years Preceding Injury; All Years Post-Injury

4. W-2 Wage and Tax Statements (Employees) or Forms 1099 (Independent Contractors): 5 Years Preceding Injury; All Years Post-Injury

5. Schedule C Profit and Loss Statements (Self- employed

Workers): 5 Years Preceding Injury; All Years Post-Injury 6. Bank Statements; Invoices; Testimony

(14)

7. Depositions of Employer; Work Supervisor; Human Resources Representative

8. Plaintiff’s: Deposition(s); Responses to Form and Special Interrogatories; Responses to Requests for Production of Documents

9. Independent Medical Expert’s Report and/or Treating Physician’s Report: return to work date; permanent and stationary date; work restrictions

10. Offsets (in CA medical malpractice): Social Security/Private Insurance Disability Payments/State Disability Insurance Payments (SDI)

11. Opposing & Retained Expert(s): Report/Complete File/ Deposition

References

Related documents

The contribution of this paper is twofold: (i) we provide new upper and lower bounds for MapReduce job execution time in shared Hadoop clusters, (ii) we formulate a linear

Teaching Assistant, Introductory Microeconomics, Yale, Spring 2000 Teaching Assistant, Mathematical Economics I, Yale, Fall 1999 Teaching Assistant, Introductory

To investigate if immunization with MUC4β-nanovaccine induced robust humoral immune responses, animals were immunized subcutaneously twice (days 0 and 14) following

In order to predict the future state of the machine conditions based on available vibration data, regression tree predictor is used.. The proposed system is shown in

The following ionization methods and the different analyzers were used: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF-MS), electrospray

The response variables we examined include the total number of firms, the number of entrants as well as the size (in terms of number of workers) of start-ups in a town. The

Drawing on Value Sensitive Design, we developed a workable privacy addendum for an open source software license that not only covers intellectual property rights while

subjective well-being literature on the importance of relative incomes and inequality on subjective well-being, the distribution-adjusted well-being literature that combines measures