• No results found

Poor Data Can Cost You Money and Get You Sued

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Poor Data Can Cost You Money and Get You Sued"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Poor Data Can Cost You Money and Get You Sued

We are all aware of the old chestnut „Garbage In, Garbage Out‟, but do the private and the public sectors pay any real attention to the quality of their data? This article attempts once again to raise awareness as to the importance of quality data and for the purposes of our discussions the term „data quality‟ applies generically to both the quality of data and information, although in more detailed discussions „data‟ and „information‟ would be more specifically defined.

The Costs and Effects of Poor Data Quality

Extensive literature has identified the high costs of low quality data and the cost of poor data quality recognising that firms may lose upwards of 10% of revenues due to poor operational data, together with other serious consequential effects relating to tactical decision making and strategy generation.

A report from The Data Warehouse Institute back in 2002 estimated that data quality problems costs US business $600 billion a year (5% of the American GDP) in postage, printing and staff overhead costs alone, whilst the majority of the senior managers in those companies affected remained unaware (Eckerson 2002). A report published jointly by Dun and Bradstreet and the Richard Ivey School of Business in 2006 forecasted that critical data within at least 25% of the Fortune 1000 companies would continue to be inaccurate and that “every business function will have direct costs associated with poor data quality”, whilst a survey conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit in the same year on behalf of SAP and Intel reported that 72% of the survey respondents said their data was sometimes inconsistent across departments and that workers frequently made poor decisions because of inadequate data. More recently Larry English outlined a catalogue of corporate disasters emanating from poor quality business information amounting to „One and a Quarter Trillion Dollars‟. During 2009 a survey of 193 organisations sponsored by Pitney Bowes, 39% of which had revenues in excess of US $1 billion, reported that a third of the respondents rated their data quality as poor at best, whilst only 4% reported it as excellent Information Difference (2009). A Gartner (one of the world‟s leading IT research organisations) report stated that “Through 2011, 75% of organisations will experience significantly reduced revenue growth potential and increased costs due to the failure to introduce data quality assurance” (Fisher 2009).

Even where organisations appreciate the importance of quality data, there appears to be a lack of any real progress. A 2007 survey conducted by BusinessWeek and Hewlett Packard highlighted the fact that many organisations will readily agree that their data is an important asset, but fail to take any action, whilst a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey a year later found that 70% of executives contacted, considered data to be an important asset, yet only 40% felt they used it effectively (Informatica 2008).. One may speculate as to the possible reasons for

(2)

this apparent absence of activity. There may be a general lack of attention to data per se at various organisational levels, or that enterprises do not persevere with those initiatives they put in place.

The quality of an organisation‟s data not only has significant commercial connotations, but it also has serious implications for all enterprises, as they respond to the huge number of regulatory requirements, in the form of record keeping, data gathering and recording and information providing. Failure to comply in full to any request can result in serious financial damage to an organisation or even threaten its very existence, even where fraud, deception or other misdemeanours are absent. This not only relates to prominent laws such as Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II, but to the myriad of government demands for data, whether they be from HM Revenue and Customs, the Office for National Statistics, or any other governmental agency whether UK or Internationally based. All have potential penalties for late delivery or erroneous information. There needs to be an alignment between Data Governance (as described below) and overall Corporate Governance. For any unified governance, risk and compliance (GRC) strategy to be successful, there has to be confidence in the quality of the inherent data. Within the world of pensions the requirement for high quality data and acceptable record-keeping is enshrined within the requirements of the Pensions Regulator http://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/guidance/guidance-record-keeping.aspx and further evidenced by the huge amount of UK pension funds paid to members who are deceased. In addition the new Carbon Reduction Commitment regulations even in a simplified form http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/lc_uk/crc/crc.aspx will require accurate records to be maintained in order to meet the reporting requirements.

The Management of Data and Data Governance

Data is both an organisational resource and an enterprise-wide asset, as valuable as any physical, financial or personal asset and therefore must be managed appropriately. Its sole purpose is to serve the organisation to enable it to attain its corporate objectives and goals.

We need to establish first and foremost guiding principles around the management of data. To be really effective we also need to identify and focus on those data sub-sets that hold real value and/or potential risk, rather than attempt to manage ALL of the data fields, much of which will be of low priority. This should be undertaken by establishing:

Ownership: Who has actual „ownership‟ or „custody‟ of the data on behalf of the organisation as a whole and thereby has responsible for the „quality‟

Responsibility: Those persons who are directly involved in any way with the entry, extraction, manipulation of any part of the data (as data suppliers, processors or

(3)

Management: Ensuring operational availability, security and business continuity- IS Department

Accountability: Everyone within the organisation

Data Policies: To be set by the organisation together with the „owners‟ or „custodians‟

Data Governance

The policy of treating data as an enterprise-wide asset assists in establishing a data

governance strategy. The concept behind adopting a data governance approach is to enable an organisation to create an environment within which data is controlled and co-ordinated. As with most successful enterprise-wide initiatives, data governance requires a mandate, ideally in the form of sponsorship from a leading executive. Without a strong mandate for change, a data governance policy and indeed a data quality initiative, cannot hope to be successful. Data governance refers to the overall management of the data within an organisation involving, not only the security and risks associated with the data, but also determining who are the true owners and custodians of the enterprise‟s data assets, procedures, policies and processes; establishing the approach towards data quality and instilling a culture of data stewardship and quality throughout. This is not just a data cleaning exercise but a culture change; the policies and initiatives need to be institutionalised so that they become part of the organisational fabric.

Taking Action

Fundamental to a data quality improvement initiative are three conceptual elements namely: People, Processes and Data. The inter-relationship between these three elements requires that any attempt to improve the overall quality of data within any organisation must be centred on people whether data suppliers, processors or information customers; the processes that receive, handle, action and pass on data and information; as well as the data itself where ever it sits within the data cycle of input, process and output. Data quality improvement is not just about fixing data or improving quality within a single business application or process, but also about taking a more expansive and forward-looking enterprise-wide approach. This must involve addressing cultural issues, initiating both short and long term process and procedural improvements by a step-by-step, incremental approach, whilst ensuring that the data

conforms to appropriate specifications or requirements. In this way any improvement initiative has an opportunity to be sustained. It has to be appreciated that there cannot be a „one size fits all‟ remedy to embedding organisational improvements at all levels, but rather to identify appropriate solutions to fit individual situations and circumstances. One accepts that data quality problems are not created intentionally by people, but more by the failure of the surrounding processes whether these are system related or individual related involving lack of

(4)

education, training, personal development or purely the person being placed in a position for which they are not suited.

From a practical perspective an organisation can commence „small‟ and build upon quick wins and successes. Executive and senior management sponsorship is paramount without which any improvement process will eventually fail. So you may need to build a business case. Alongside this a project champion is required together with „internal champions‟ to cascade the initiative(s) across the organisation. Take things slowly to ensure everyone is on board and Identify who has the ownership/custody and responsibility as described above. Within this context it will be worth re-iterating that data quality is NOT about IT but unequivocally a business issue. Provide regular visible measures to monitor progress around the data and processes that are important to you in terms of costs and business risk and at the same time build data quality targets into peoples‟ objectives. Ascertain the root causes of issues and attempt to resolve problems at source. We are essentially looking at principles of quality management and the management of change.

Whilst this article cannot be more than a snap shot to renew awareness and initiate some actions, it may hopefully stimulate further discussion. As stated above many organisations realise they have a problem with their data, but do not appear to be doing a great deal about it.

May I also refer fellow members to the works of probably the three leading proponents of data quality over the last twenty years namely:

Rich Wang at MIT

Larry English at Infoimpact Tom Redman at Navesink

You will find a wealth of rich material within their writings

In addition two web sites should also provide you with strong practical advice:

The International Association for Information and Data Quality- a professional association for those interested in improving business effectiveness through quality data and information.

http://iaidq.org/

Data Quality Pro- a free expert resource providing data quality articles, webinars, forums and tutorials from the world's leading experts.

(5)

References

Dun and Bradstreet and Richard Ivery School of Business. (2006). The Cost of Poor Data Quality: 1-13: Dun and Bradstreet.

Eckerson, W. (2002). Data Quality and the Bottom Line: Achieving Business Success through a Commitment to High Quality Data: 1-33: The Data Warehouse Institute.

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2006). Business Intelligence- Putting Information to Work: 25. London.

English, L. P. (2009). Information Quality Applied. Indianapolis: Wiley Publications Inc: 802.

Fisher, T. (2009). The Data Asset: How Smart Companies Govern Their Data for Business Success. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons: 220.

Hewlett-Packard. (2007). Managing Data as a Corporate Asset: Three Action Steps towards Successful Data Governance: 1-8.

Informatica. (2008). Timely, trusted Data Unlocks the Door to Governance, Risk and Compliance: 15: Informatica Corporation.

Information Difference. (2009). The State of Data Quality Today: 33: The Information

Difference Company. http://www.pbinsight.com/files/resource-library/resource-files/The-State-of-Data-Quality-Today.pdf

References

Related documents

This set comprises publication output indicators such as (1) the share in the world total, (2) subject-based publication profiles, (3) citation-based indicators like journal-

The  first  recommendation  for  solving  the  container  logistics  problems  at  MAAN  is  to  improve  the  communication  and  information  flow  throughout 

[r]

As you may recall, last year Evanston voters approved a referendum question for electric aggregation and authorized the city to negotiate electricity supply rates for its residents

When PWM module is operated in Complementary, Redundant and Push-pull output modes, with Independent Time Base (ITB = 1) and Independent Fault mode (IFLTMOD = 1) enabled, the PWMxH

Unit descriptor This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to organise domestic and overseas business travel, including developing

In Avesta, nouns, adjectives, participles and other parts of speech are formed by adding suffixes to roots. These nouns and adjectives are crude forms. If they have to

En efecto, así como los libertarianos ven en cual- quier forma de intervención del Estado una fuente inevitable de interferencias arbitrarias –con la excepción de aquella acción