• No results found

PM/PMO Knowledge and Tools from DAU through the AT&L Knowledge Management System

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PM/PMO Knowledge and Tools from DAU through the AT&L Knowledge Management System"

Copied!
38
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PM/PMO Knowledge and Tools from DAU through

the AT&L Knowledge Management System

John Hickok

Director, Knowledge Management

Global Learning and Technology Center

g

gy

(2)

System Integration

System Demonstration

Low-Rate Initial Production

Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics Life Cycle Management Framework

Full-Rate Production/Deployment

MS

B

System Development & Demonstration Phase

Operations & Support Phase

Three DOD

Decision Support Systems

Effective Interaction is Essential

Sustainment

Technology Development Phase

Concept Refinement Phase

MS

C

MS

A

The Milestone Decision Authority may authorize entry into the acquisition process at any point, consistent with phase specific entrance criteria and statutory requirements

Production & Deployment Phase

Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System VCJCS Oversight CJCSI 3170.01D Defense Acquisition System USD(AT&L) Oversight DoDD 5000.1 Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution DEPSECDEF Oversight MID 913

Draft ver. 4.7. May 21, 2004

Refine initial concept. Develop Technology

Development Strategy

Reduce technology risk and determine appropriate set of

technologies to integrate into a full system.

Develop a system or increment of capability; reduce integration and manufacturing risk; ensure operational supportability; reduce

logistics footprint; implement human systems integration; design for producibility; ensure affordability and protection of critical

program information; and demonstrate system integration, interoperability, safety, and utility.

Achieve operational capability that satisfies

mission needs.

Execute a support program that meets operational support performance requirements and

sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle. Dispose of the

system in the most cost-effective manner at the end of its useful life.

Disposal

This chart is a classroom aid for Defense Acquisition University students. It provides a notional illustration of the interfaces among the three major decision support systems used to develop, produce, and field a system for national defense. Defense acquisition is a complex process, with many more activities than shown here, and many concurrent processes that cannot be properly displayed on a two-dimensional chart. Supporting information is on the back of this chart. For more detailed information see the Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Knowledge

Sharing System (http://akss.dau.mil).

Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System Acronyms

Decision Points/Milestones

CD

DRR

FRP

DR

FOC

IOC

CDD

System Threat Assessment

Information Support Plan

CPD

Service/JROC Validation & Approval J-6 Interoperability

& Supportability Cert.

Validated and approved CDD and CPD for each increment of an evolutionary

acquisition

Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS)

Net-Ready KPP

KPPs

CPD

System Threat Assessment

Information Support Plan Service/JROC Validation & Approval J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Cert. Net-Ready

KPP

Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS)

Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS)

Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS)

ADM

Exit

Criteria

DAB/

ITAB

MDA

ADM

DAB/

MDA

Criteria

Exit

DAB/

ADM

ITAB

MDA

APB

Criteria

Exit

DAB/

ADM

ITAB

MDA

Criteria

Exit

DAB/

ADM

ITAB

MDA

APB

Criteria

Exit

DAB/

ADM

ITAB

MDA

APB

Increment III

B C DRR FRP

Increment II

B C DRR FRP

KPPs

Initiate Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy

Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy

Joint

Capabilities

Integration &

Development

System

(need driven)

Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System - Acronyms CDD – Capability Development Document CJCSI – Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

Instruction CPD – Capability Production Document DOTMLPF – Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities

DAB – Defense Acquisition Board ICD – Initial Capabilities Document IOC – Initial Operational Capability JROC – Joint Requirements Oversight Council

KPP – Key Performance Parameter

Draft

CDD

FOC

ICD

Post Independent Analysis Functional Area Analysis Functional Needs Analysis

Joint Operations Concepts

D O T M L P F

Joint Operating Concepts Joint Functional Concepts Joint Integrating Concepts Integrated Architectures DoD Strategic

Guidance

Functional Solution Analysis

DOTMLPF Changes (CJCSI 3180)

Service/JROC Validation & Approval Materiel Changes (CJCSI 3170) Ideas for Materiel Approaches Analysis of Materiel Approaches Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative N

Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture

Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture

Threshold/objective tradeoffs –

Revised Performance Attributes

Revised Performance Attributes

Threshold/objective tradeoffs –

Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture

Integrated

Baseline

Review

Integrated

Baseline

Review

Post

Deployment

Performance

Review

AoA

Plan

Oversight &

Review

ADM

Met

ITAB

MDA

ADM

ITAB

MDA

APB

Met

ITAB

MDA

ADM

Met

ITAB

MDA

ADM

APB

Met

ITAB

MDA

ADM

APB

Met

ITAB

MDA

ADM

Contracting

Acq

Plan

Source

Selection

Plan

Draft

RFP

RFP

Acq

Plan

Draft

RFP

RFP

Source

Selection

Plan

Purpose of LRIP:

Establish Production Base

Ramp to Production Rate

Produce systems for IOT&E

Low-Rate Initial

Prototypes/

Technology

Development Strategy

• Program Strategy • Cost, schedule &

performance goals & exit criteria for first tech

demo • Test Plan

Acquisition Strategy

• Program Structure • Acquisition Approach • Capability Needs • T&E Considerations • Risk Management • Resource Management • Life-Cycle Considerations • Business Considerations

System Development

& Demonstration

Contract

Integrated

Baseline

Review

LRIP

Contract

AoA

Best

Study

Contracts

Tech

Preliminary

Acq

Plan

Draft

RFP

RFP

Source

Selection

Plan

Technology

Development

Contract

Acq

Plan

Draft

RFP

RFP

Source

Selection

Plan

System

Prototypes/

Initial

ADM – Acquisition Decision Memorandum AoA – Analysis of Alternatives APB – Acquisition Program Baseline

CD – Concept Decision DAB – Defense Acquisition Board DRR – Design Readiness Review FOC – Full Operational Capability

FRPDR – Full-Rate Production Decision Review IOC – Initial Operational Capability ITAB – Information Technology Acquisition Board

LRIP – Low Rate Initial Production MAIS – Major Automated Information System

MDA – Milestone Decision Authority Oversight & Review Acronyms

RFP – Request for Proposal

AoA

updated

Full-Rate

Major

Post Production Software Support Contracts

Sustainment Contracts

Acquisition Strategy

• Program Structure • Acquisition Approach • Capability Needs • T&E Considerations • Risk Management • Resource Management • Life-Cycle Considerations • Business Considerations

Acquisition Strategy

• Program Structure • Acquisition Approach • Capability Needs • T&E Considerations • Risk Management • Resource Management • Life-Cycle Considerations • Business Considerations

AoA

updated n/a MAIS

AoA

MAIS only

Preferred

Final

Integrated

Baseline

Review

Production

Contract

Total Life

Cycle Systems

Management

Defense

Acquisition

System

(event driven)

Low Rate Initial

Production

Systems

Prototypes/

Engineering

Dev Models

Materiel

Approach(es)

Demos

Tech

Integrated

Architecture

Supports O&M Budget

Review

In-Service

Review

Syste

Performance

Spec

Prototypes/

Engineering

Dev Models

Initial

Production

Baseline

Full Rate

Production

Systems

Major

Products

e e ed

System

Concept

Final

Production

Baseline

FOT&E

INPUTS

INPUTS

•ICD •AoA Plan •Exit Criteria •Alternative Maintenance &

Logistics Concepts

INPUTS

OUTPUTS

OUTPUTS

OUTPUTS

•ICD & Draft CDD •Preferred Sys Concept

•Exit Criteria •T&E Strategy •Support & Maintenance

Concepts & Technologies

•AoA •SEP •TDS

•Sys Performance Spec •Exit Criteria •Validated Sys Support &

Maintenance Objectives & Requirements •APB •CDD •SEP •ISP •TEMP

Logistics & Technical Acronyms ASR – Alternative Systems Review BLRIP – Beyond Low Rate Initial Production

CDR – Critical Design Review CI – Configuration Item DT&E – Developmental Test & Evaluation EDM – Engineering Development Model EOA – Early Operational Assessment ESOH – Environmental, Safety & Occupational Health

FCA – Functional Configuration Audit FMECA – Failure Mode Effects & Criticality Analysis

O & &

OT&E – Operational Test & Evaluation OTRR – Operational Test Readiness Review PESHE – Programmatic Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Evaluation PDR – Preliminary Design Review PCA – Physical Configuration Audit PRR – Production Readiness Review PPP – Program Protection Plan RMS – Reliability, Maintainability &

Most Acceptable Recycle/Reuse Reprocessing Disposal Landfill

Disposal

Logistics/

Sustainment

Operations & Sustainment

•Peacetime •Training•Joint Operations •Crises

Evaluate Product

Support Capabilities

Performance Based Agreements Business Case Analysis

Product Support Integrator/ Product Support Provider

LFTE Report to Congress BLRIP Report to Congress

A

A

C

C

CD

CD

B

B

DRR

DRR

FRP

FRP

DR

DR

Demonstrate Product Support Capability

•Footprint Reduction •Supply Chain Management •Product Support Elements

Define

Supportability

Objectives

•Prelim Sys Spec •T&E Strategy •SEP •Support & Maintenance

Concepts & Technologies

•Inputs to: -draft CDD -AoA -TDS -Cost/Manpower Est.

ASR

•Sys Performance Spec •LFT&E Waiver Request •TEMP •Validated Sys Support &

Maintenance Objectives & Requirements

•SEP •PESHE •PPP •TRA •Inputs to:

-IBR -ISP -STA -CDD -Acq Strategy -Affordability Assessment

-Cost/Manpower Est.

SVR

PRR

SRR

•Initial Prod Baseline •Test Reports •TEMP •Elements of Product Support •Risk Assessment •SEP •TRA •PESHE •Inputs to: -CPD -STA -ISP -Cost/Manpower Est.

Independent IOT&E

Full-Up System Level LFT&E

J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Validation

Product Support Package/PBL Implementation

•Product Support Elements •Support and Cost Baseline•Supply Chain Management •Contract for Sustainment (organic & commercial)

OTRR

JITC Interoperability Certification Testing

Develop Initial Product Support Strategy

•Interoperability •Supply Chain Mgmt •LCC Optimization •Footprint reduction •Product Support Elements

Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Strategy

(Preferred Product Support Approach) Refine Supportability Objectives/ Constraints Set Product Support Strategy

Pre-IOC & Post IOC Supportability Assessments

•Continuous Tech Refreshment •Obsolescence Management •Configuration Control

•Data Management

Product Support/PBL Management

•Public-Private Partnering •PBA Modifications •Assessment of PSI/PSPs •Supply Chain Management

Product Support Plan

•Statutory/Regulatory •Source of Support •Legacy Considerations-Maintenance -Support Data-Supply Support -Training

-Manpower & personnel

•Product Support Elements

The Challenge

DoD’s “A”cquisition Systems and Processes

FCA

LFT&E Waiver (if appropriate)

Technical

Systems Engineering

Test & Evaluation

Supportability

Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus Defined User Needs Develop Concept

Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints

Decompose Concept Perf into Functional Definition & Verification Objectives Assess/Analyze Concept System Versus Functional Capabilities Decompose Concept

Functional Definition into Component Concepts/ Assessment Objectives

Develop Component Concepts Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Components Versus Capabilities

Interpret User Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints

Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Versus Defined User Needs Develop System Perf

(& Constraints) Spec & Enabling/Critical Tech &Verification Plan Develop Functional Definitions for Enabling/ Critical Technologies & Associated Verification Plan

Demo System Functionality Versus Plan Decompose Functional

Definitions into Critical Component Definition & Tech Verification Plan

Demo Enabling/ Critical Technology Components Versus Plan Develop System Concepts

TRR

PDR

SRR

Interpret User Needs, Refine System Performance Specs & Environmental Constraints

Develop System Functional Specs & System Verification Plan

Evolve Functional Performance Specs into CI Functional (Design to) Specs and CI Verification Plan

Evolve CI Functional Specs into Product (Build to) Documentation

and Inspection Plan F b i t A bl

Integrated DT&E, LFT&E & EOAs Verify Performance Compliance to Specs Individual CI Verification DT&E

SFR

CDR

Trades Analyze Assess/Analyze Concept & Verify System Concept’s Performance

Trades Analyze Demo/Model Integrated System Versus

Performance Spec

Trades Analyze System DT&E, LFT&E & OAs, Verify System Functionality & Constraints Compliance to Specs

Monitor and Collect All Service Use Data Analyze Data to Determine Root Cause Determine System Risk/ Hazard Severity

Integrate & Test Corrective Action

Implement and Field

INPUTS

•Service Use Data •User Feedback •Failure Reports •Discrepancy Reports •SEP

OUTPUTS

Analyze Trades Assess Risk of Improved System Combined DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E Demonstrate System to Specified User Needs & Environmental Constraints Analyze Deficiencies To Determine Corrective Actions

OUTPUTS

Modify Configuration (Hardware/Software/Specs) To Correct Deficiencies FOT&E – Follow-on Test & Evaluation

FTA – Failure Tree Analysis IOT&E – Initial Operational Test & Evaluation

ISR – In-Service Review JITC – Joint Interoperability Test Command

LFT&E – Live Fire Test & Evaluation LCC – Life Cycle Costs LORA – Level of Repair Analysis LRIP – Low Rate Initial Production MTA – Maintenance Task Analysis OA – Operational Assessment

Supportability SEP – Systems Engineering Plan

S&T – Science & Technology SFR – System Functional Review SRR – System Requirements Review STA – System Threat Assessment SVR – System Verification Review T&E – Test & Evaluation TEMP – Test & Evaluation Master Plan TDS – Technology Development Strategy TRA – Technology Readiness Assessment TRR – Test Readiness Review

Least Acceptable

p

•Test Results •Exit Criteria •APB • CPD • SEP •TEMP

•Product Support Package

INPUTS

Verify & Validate Production Configuration

MTA

FMECA

FTA

RCM

LORA

ASR

SRR

SVR

PRR

•Data for In-Service Review •Input to CDD for next increment •Modifications/upgrades to fielded systems

•SEP •Production Baseline

•Test Reports •TEMP • PESHE • SEP

•Input to:

- Cost/Manpower Est.

PCA

q

y

Cost

Actual Costs

Engineering

Cost Estimation

Methods

Parametric

Analogy

PMO Budget Estimate

PMO POM Input

Full

Funding in

FYDP

Economic Analysis

(MAIS Only)

Affordability

Assessment

CARD

(Designated

Programs)

POE

CCA

ICE

POE

CCA

ICE

Affordability

Assessment

Economic Analysis

(MAIS Only) CARD – Cost Analysis Requirements Description

CCA – Component Cost Assessment ICE – Independent Cost Estimate MAIS – Major Automated Information System

POE – Program Office Estimate RDT&E – Research, Development, Test & Evaluation

Cost Acronyms

A

i t d F d T S

t C t

t

Affordability

Assessment

POE

CCA

ICE

Economic Analysis

(MAIS Only)

CARD

(Designated Programs)

Operations &

Maintenance

Types of

Funds

RDT&E – Management & Support

RDT&E – Management & Support

RDT&E – Management & Support

RDT&E – Adv Component Dev & Prototypes

RDT&E – Systems Development & Demonstration

Procurement

RDT&E – Advanced Technology Development

Develop Component Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints

& Cost/Risk Drivers

Develop System Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies,

Update Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Fabricate, Assemble, Code to “Build-to” Documentation Develop Corrective Action

• Process Change –

Hardware/Support

• Materiel Change

Planning,

Programming,

Budgeting,

& Execution

Process

(biennial calendar driven)

Military

Departments &

Defense Agencies

National Military Strategy

FYDP

updated

Budget

Committees

Congress

Congress

DoD

Budget

On Year

Off Year

POM/Budget Formulation

PCP/BCP Prep

Final

PBDs

National Security Strategy

DoD Testimony

Strategic Planning

Guidance

Off Year Optional

Fiscal Guidance

President’s

Budget to

Congress

Joint Programming Guidance

Off Year Optional

White

House

OSD &

Joint Staff

OMB

SLRG Reviews

Joint Planning Document

PBD Cycle

POM/Budget Submit

PCP/BCP Submit

FYDP

updated

MBI

Allocation

Apportionment

October

April / May

August

September - November

October - November

November

December

January

February (1st Monday)

February - September

DoD Appeals

BCP – Budget Change Proposals FYDP – Future Years Defense Program

MBI – Major Budget Issue OMB – Office of Management & Budget

PBD – Program Budget Decision PCP – Program Change Proposals PDM – Program Decision Memorandum POM – Program Objectives Memorandum SLRG – Senior Leadership Review Group Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution Acronyms

Appropriation

Committees

Authorization

Committees

Authorization/

Appropriation

Acts Passed

PDM(s)

(3)

The

 

Acquisition

 

Warrior

Unpredictable activity with

end users OSD Congress

Challenges of Human

Capital Management

end users, OSD, Congress,

industry, oversight

organizations, and media

g

Known Unknowns and

Unknown Unknowns

Unknown Unknowns

DAU’s Challenge: Help workforce do their jobs,

continuously learn, and respond

(4)

AT&L

 

Knowledge

 

Management

 

System

 

(AKMS)

 

Systems

 

and

 

Tools

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

PM Gateway to Continuous

Learning Center

(10)
(11)
(12)

49 Functional and Special Interest

Knowledge Communities

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

Doc Requirements linked to

Process Guidance

(18)
(19)

Milestone Document ID and

Development (MDID) Tool

Development (MDID) Tool

(20)

Knowledge Aggregated in ACQuipedia

Articles

(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)

Selecting Topic in Phase Goes to

ACQuipedia Article

(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)

What’s Ahead to Support the Workforce?

Personalization – A “My DAP” option, pushing the latest information based on personal

fil d d

profiles and needs

Upgraded AAP system and conversion to “Ask A Question” System with tie-in to

communities of practice

Upgraded BPCh system and integration with communities of practice

Expanded set of Performance Learning Tools – Contract Pricing and Reference Guides,

Updated ILC Life Cycle Log Chart Milestone Document ID and Development

Updated ILC, Life Cycle Log Chart, Milestone Document ID and Development

Templates, Joint Probability of Program Success, and many others

(38)

What Can You Do to Help DAU?

Use the Systems and Tools

y

Pass the word to your troops and organization

Give us your feedback on what’s not correct and what you need

Contribute as much as you can into the PM CoP real examples real

Contribute as much as you can into the PM CoP – real examples, real

References

Related documents

This paper proposed a decision support approach for the design of recon fi gurable rotary machining systems with turrets used for producing several families of parts.. The com-

Optical fibre cable should not be installed directly into main duct which contains copper cable because this would sterilise the duct (installation of further cables or recovery

[r]

Troop E 192nd Cavalry US Army National Guard Field Kitchen (Runner-Up) 110th M i t C Troop E 192nd Cavalry. San Juan, Puerto Rico 110th Maintenance Company

Funds may gain approval as investment trusts pursuant to Section 842 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (ICTA) provided that they are not closed companies, and the income

Concerning the ratio citations/SCI paper (Fig. 4) the tenured Civil Engineering Professors of UC and UNL have the lead position with 7 citations per SCI paper, Professors at UL