• No results found

Letters and Essays - Simone Weil

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Letters and Essays - Simone Weil"

Copied!
243
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

COPYRIGHT, IpJI,BY G. P.PUTNAM'S SONS

Capricorn Books Edition, 1959.

Library of Congress Catalogue

CardNumber59-14857

(5)

Contents

BIOGRAPHICAL

NOTE

Vll

INTRODUCTION BY

LESLIE A. FIEDLER 3

LETTERS

LETTER

I HESITATIONS

CONCERNING BAPTISM

43

LETTER

II

SAME

SUBJECT

52

LETTER

III

ABOUT HER DEPARTURE

58

LETTER

IV SPIRITUAL

AUTOBIOGRAPHY

61

LETTER

V

HER INTELLECTUAL VOCATION

84

LETTER

VI LAST

THOUGHTS

88

ESSAYS

REFLECTIONS

ON THE

RIGHT USE OF

SCHOOL

STUDIES

WITH

A

VIEW TO THE

LOVE OF

GOD

105

THE

LOVE OF GOD

AND

AFFLICTION 117

FORMS

OF

THE

IMPLICIT

LOVE

OF

GOD

137

THE

LOVE

OF

OUR

NEIGHBOR

139

LOVE

OF

THE

ORDER

OF

THE

WORLD

158

THE LOVE

OF RELIGIOUS PRACTICES 181

FRIENDSHIP 2OO

IMPLICIT

AND

EXPLICIT

LOVE

2O8

CONCERNING

THE OUR

FATHER

216

(6)
(7)

'Biographical

7\7ote*

SIMONE

WEIL

was born

inParis

on February

3, 1909.

The

houseof herbirth in theBoulevard de Strasbourghas since been pulled

down

to

make room

for the rue de Metz.

Thanks

to herbrother Andre,

who

was

her elder

by

three years, she

was

exceptionally advanced in her

knowledge

of literature

and

science.

At

six she could quote passages of Racine

by

heart,

and

although herstudies

were

constantly interruptedasaresultof theFirst

World

War,

sheobtained her baccalaureat eslettreswith distinction inJune, 1924,at the age offifteen.

The

president of theboard of examiners,

who

was

a specialist in the literature of the early

Middle

Ages, gave her 19 out of 20 afterheroral test.

During

her year of philosophy she

worked

under

La

Senne; then she had Alaint as her masterfor

two

years at the College

Henri

IV

when

she prepared for the competi-tiveentrance examinationof theEcole

Normale.

Alain,

who

*This

note,provided bythe Frenchpublishers,replaces the Introduc-tion and notesby the Reverend J. M. Perrin, which are withdrawn at their request.

tPseudonymofthewell-known Frenchphilosopherandessayist,Emile AugusteChartier (1868-).

(8)

BIOGRAPHICAL

NOTE

recognizedthatshehadphilosophicalgenius

and

saw

inher "a

power

of thought

which

was

rare," followed her

de-velopment

with attentive

and

kindly interest, noting,

how-ever, that she

had

to be

on

her guard against too close

reasoning expressed in almost impenetrable language

and

that, inthe end, "shehad beenwillingtoturn

from

thedeep abstract subtleties

which were

a

game

forher

and

to train herself in directanalysis."

Sheentered theEcole

Normale

Superieurein1928,leftas aqualifiedteacherof philosophyin 1931,and

was

appointed

to the secondary school for girls at

Le

Puy. There,

from

December,

1931 until the spring of 1932 she gave public proof of her

uncompromising

opposition

toward

official compulsion of

any

sorthelpingand encouragingthe

unem-ployed

workmen

of the

town by

her

marked sympathy and

by

taking direct action against themunicipal authorities.

She

had friends in the

group

of the Revolution Prole-tarienne,andin 1932 she

began

tocontribute tothisreview.

She

was

thus given an opportunity of expressing in clear

and

accurate terms and with a real

knowledge

of

human

problems her

main

ideas

and

herfeelingaboutthe condition oftheworkers.

Appointed

to aschool at

Auxerre

inOctober, 1932,

and

in 1933 tooneat Roanne, shethen decided totake a year's leave so that shecouldexperiencefullythe

working

people's life to

which

she had alreadytried to accustom herself

by

working

inthefieldsof the Jura duringthe

summer

months.

Having

takenajobintheRenault works,she hireda

room

in aneighboring house

and

strove, in spite of the headaches

and

delicatehealth she

had

always had to contend with, to

(9)

BIOGRAPHICAL

NOTE

avoid anythingthatcould

make

herlotdifferintheslightest degree

from

thatof her

companions

inthe

workshop.

When

herleave

came

toan

end

in 1935, she againtook a teaching post, this time at the girls' secondary school at Bourges.

She

leftinthe

summer

of 1936 to

go

to Barcelona inthebeginningofAugust,

She

wanted

to

be

able tojudge for herself of the struggle

between

the

"Reds" and

the "Francoites."

During

the following

October

she returned to France

afterhaving sharedthesufferings of theRepublican

Army

forseveral

weeks

on

theCatalonianfront

and

having

experi-encedinthevery depthsofher beingthe uttercalamityof war.

Another

period ofleave, this time

on

accountof illness, prevented her

from

taking

up

before 1937 an appointment

at the secondary school for girls at Saint Quentin.

Once

more,inJanuary, 1938,herhealth obligedherto stop

work-inguntilthetime

when

the

Second

World

War

broke out.

On

June

13, 1940, she decidedto leave Paris

and

settled atMarseillesin

October

ofthe

same

year,with herfamily,

In June, 1941, a friend introduced her to the

Reverend

FatherPerrin,

who

was

then atthe

Dominican Convent

in Marseilles

and who,

two

years later,

was

to bearrested

by

the Gestapo. Father Perrin introduced her to

Gustave

Thibon

with

whom

she stayed for a while in Ardeche.

There, once

more

impelled

by

her longing tosharein alife ofdirectcontactwiththesoil,she

engaged

in

manual work,

either inthefieldsduringthe harvest, orinthevineyardsat thetimeofthe grape-gathering.

She

didnot

on

thataccount give

up

any

of herstudies of philosophy,

whether

Greek

or

(10)

BIOGRAPHICAL

NOTE

Hindu, and

went

on widening

her

knowledge

of Sanskrit.

At

the

same

time hermystical tendencies

and

her

preoccu-pation with the notion of

God

became more

pronounced, leadinghertowrite thepages

on

the

Our

Father

and on

the

Love

of

God

which

are tobe readfarther on.

On

returning to Marseilles for the winter she continued her talks

and

discussions with Father Perrin and at his re-quest she

expounded

herthoughts

on

Plato

and

the Pythag-oreans to the circle that used to

meet

in the crypt of the

Dominican Convent

there.

When

Father Perrin

was

chosenasSuperior at Moritpel-lier, in

March,

1942, he did not lose contact with

Simone

Weil.

They

went

on

meeting, writingletters,and exchang-ing their views right

up

to the time

when

Simone

left

France.

It

was

probably

on

May

15, 1942, that she

wrote

thelong letter,

which

she callsher "spiritual autobiography," to Fa-therPerrin, then

away

on

ajourney.

Her

boatleftthe port

on

May

17. Shespent three

weeks

at Casablanca,ina

camp

where

travelers in transit

from

Franceto

America

were

con-fined.

Here

she prepared a certain

number

of additional papers.

These

she senttoFatherPerrinasa spirituallegacy,

and on

May

26, in alast letter of farewell, she

completed

and added

to thatof

May

15.

Soon

after reaching

New

York

at the

end

of June, 1942,

she received a call to serve

under

the

French

provisional

government and

left for

England on

November

10.

In

London

she

was

commissioned to

make

astudy of of-ficialdocuments;she outlined plans

and wrote

along

(11)

BIOGRAPHICAL

KOTE

united,ofthe State

and

theindividual.*She

wanted

toshare the hardship of those shehadleftinFrance

and

carriedthis to suchapointthat, although overtired and run

down,

she refused the extra nourishment ordered

by

the doctors

and

keptstrictly to the rations to

which

hercompatriots inthe occupied zone

were

limited atthattime.

The

stateof her health

became

so

much

worse

that, inthe

second fortnight of April, 1943, she

was

admitted to the MiddlesexHospital,

whence

she

was

transferredin the

mid-dleof

August

to asanatoriumat

Ashford

inKent.

The

lastsentence she

wrote

inthe

notebook found

after

herdeath was:

"The

most

important part of education to teach the

meaning

of to

know

(inthe scientificsense)."

The

whole

of

Simone

Weil

is contained in these

few

words.

A

day

or

two

later,

on August

29, 1943, she diedat

Ash-ford.

The

correspondencehere published and theessays

which

follow

were

all sentorgiven tothe

Reverend

FatherPerrin

by

Simone

Weil,atthetime

when

she

was

stillableto

com-municate withhim.

In giving this collection of letters and essays the title of

WAITING

FOR

GOD,

the publisher has sought to suggest a favoritethoughtof

Simone Weil which

she expressedinthe

Greek words

v UTUO^VT]: waitinginpatience.

*Published as VEnracineinent (Gallimard, Paris, 1949)- E"g- trans.:

The NeedforRoots (G.P. Putnam'sSons,

New

York, 1952). xi

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

introduction

SINCE HER

DEATH,

Simone

Weil

has

come

to

seem

more

and

more

a special exemplar of sanctity for our time the

Out-sider as Saint in an age of alienation, our kind of saint. In eight scantyears, this

young

Frenchwoman,

whom

scarcely

anyone

had heard of before her sacrificial death in exile at

the age of 34, has

come

to possessthe imagination of

many

in the

Western

world. Catholic and Protestant, Christian

and

Jew, agnostic and devout,

we

have all turned to her with the

profound

conviction that the

meaning

of her ex-perience is our meaning, that she is really ours.

Few

ofus, to be sure,

would

find nothing to dissent

from

in her re-ligious thought; fewer still

would

be capable of emulating the terrible purity of her life;

none

could measure himself,

without shame, againstthe absolute ethos

toward which

she aspired.

And

yet she does not

seem

strange to us, as other mystics and witnesses of

God

have

seemed

strange; for

though

on onesideher life touchestheremote mysteries of the Divine Encounter,

on

the otherit is rooted in a

world

with

which

we

are familiar.

She

speaks oftheproblemsof belief inthe vocabularyof 3

(16)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

the unbeliever, of thedoctrinesofthe

Church

inthe

words

oftheunchurched.

The

askesis,the"darknight of thesoul,"

through

which

she passed to certitude,isthe

modern

intel-lectual's familiar pattern of attraction

toward and

disil-lusionment

with

Marxism, the discipline of

contemporary

politics.

The

day-to-daystruggles of tradeunionism,

unem-ployment, the Civil

War

in Spain, the role of the Soviet Union, anarchism,

and

pacifism these arethe determinants of herideas, theunforeseen roads that ledherto sanctity.

Though

she passedfinally

beyond

politics,her thoughtbears tothe

end

the

mark

of herearlyinterests,asthe teachingof St.Paulisinfluenced

by

hisRabbinicalschooling,orthatof St.Augustine

by

histraining inrhetoric.

Beforeher death, scarcely

any

of

Simone

Weil'sreligious writings

had been

published.

To

those in

France

who

thoughtofherstill,interms of herearlypolitical essays,as

a

somewhat

unorthodox

Marxist

moving

toward

anarchism, the

posthumous

Christian

books must

have

come

asashock. Surely,

no

"friendof

God"

inallListory,

had

moved more

unwillingly

toward

themystic encounter.

There

is in her

earlier

work

no

sense ofa groping

toward

the divine,

no

promise ofholiness,

no

pursuitofa purity

beyond

this

world

only a conventionally left-wing concern

with

the prob-lems ofindustrialization,renderedina toneat

once

extraor-dinarily inflexible

and

wonderfullysensitive.

The

particularnote ofconviction in

Simone

Weil's

testi-mony

arises

from

the feeling thatherrole as amystic

was

so unintended,

one

for

which

she

had

notin

any

sense pre-pared.

An

undertone of incredulity persists beneath her astonishing honesty: quite suddenly

God

had

taken her,

(17)

INTRODUCTION

radical, agnostic,

contemptuous

ofreligiouslifeandpractice asshehad observedit! She clung alwaystoher sense of be-ing an Outsider

among

the religious, to a feeling that her improbable approach had givenhera specialvocation,asan "apostle to the Gentiles," planted at "the intersection of Christianityand everythingthatisnot

Christianity."She re-fused tobecome, inthetypical compensatory excessofthe convert,

more

of the

Church

than those born into it; she

would

noteven bebaptized,

and

it isherunique

position, at

onceinand out ofinstitutionalized Catholicism, that deter-mines herspecial role and meaning.

To

those

who

considerthemselves

on

thesafe side of be-lief,sheteachestheuncomfortabletruththatthe onbeliefof

many

atheistsiscloser toatrue love of

God

andatrue sense ofhisnature, thanthekind of easyfaithwhich, never hav-ing experienced

God,

hangs a label bearing his

name on

some

childishfantasy or projection of the ego. Like Kierke-gaard, shepreachedtheparadoxofitsbeingeasierfora

non-Christian to

become

a Christian, than for a "Christian" to

become

one.

To

those

who

believe in a single Revelation,

and

enjoythe

warm

sensationof being savedina

cozy

circle

of friends, she

expounded

the doctrine of a gospel spread

in

many

"languages," ofa divine

Word

shared

among

rival

myths, in each of

which

certain important truths, implicit elsewhere, are

made

explicit.

For

those to

whom

religion

means

comfort and peace of mind, she brings the terrible

reminderthatChristpromisednotpeace butthesword,

and

that his

own

last

words were

a cry of absolute despair, the "/i, Eli, lama sabachthani!"

which

is the true glory of Christianity.

(18)

WAITING

FOR COD

But

she always considered that her chief mission

was

to thosestill

"submerged

inmaterialism/' thatis,to

most

of us in a chaotic and disenchanted world.

To

the unbeliever

who

has rather

smugly

despised the churchgoer for seeking aneasy consolation, she revealsthesecret of his

own

cow-ardice, suggesting that his agnosticism

may

itself be only anopiate,a

dodge

toavoid facing theterrorof

God's

reality

and the awful burden of hislove.

She refused to cut herself off

from

anyone,

by

refusing to identify herself completely with

anyone

or

any

cause.

She rejected the temptation to

withdraw

into a congenial group, onceassociated with which, she could be

disowned

by

alloutside ofit. Sherather took

upon

herself the task of

sustainingall possible beliefs in their infinite contradictions

and

on

theirendless levelsof relevance; thesmugnessof the false elect, the materialism of the shallowly rebellious, self-deceitand hypocrisy, parochialism and atheism

from

each she extracteditspartial truth,and enduredthelargerportion oferror. She chosetosubmitto akindof perpetualinvisible crucifixion; herfinal relationship toall those she

would

not

disown became

thatof the crucified to the cross.

The

French

editors of

Simone

Weil's works, Gustave

Thibon, a lay theologian

who

was

also her friend, and Fa-ther Perrin, the nearest thing to a confessor she ever had, have both spoken of Sirnone Weil's refusal to be baptized

as a

mere

stage in her development, a nonessential flaw in her thinking,which, hadsheonly livedlonger,

would

prob-ably have beenremedied.

M.

Thibon and

FatherPerrinare, of course, Catholics,

and

speak as they

must

out of their great love for Mile Weil, and theirunderstandable

(19)

INTRODUCTION

tion that such holinesscould not permanently have stayed outside of the

Church;

but

from Simone

Weil's

own

point of view, her outsideness

was

the very essence of her

posi-tion. This is

made

especially clear in the present volume. "I feel," she

wrote

once, "thatit isnecessary tome,

pre-scribed forme, to bealone, an outsider and alienated

from

every

human

context whatsoever."

And

on

another

occa-sion, she jotted in her journal the self-reminder, "Preserve

your

solitude!"

What

motivatedher

was no

selfish desireto

withdraw from

the ordinary concourse of

men,

but

pre-cisely the opposite impulse. She

knew

that

one

remains alienated

from

aparticularallegiance,not

by

vainly attempt-ing to

deny

all beliefs,butprecisely

by

sharing

them

all.

To

have

become

rooted in the context of aparticular religion,

Simone

Weil

felt,

would

on

theone hand,have exposed her to

what

shecalls"the patriotism of theChurch," witha con-sequent blindness to the faults of her

own

group

and

the

virtuesof others,

and

would,

on

the other hand, have sep-arated her

from

the

common

condition here below,

which

findsus all"outsiders,uprooted, inexile."

The

most

terrible

of crimes is tocollaborate inthe uprooting of others in an already alienatedworld; butthe greatest ofvirtues isto up-root oneself for the sakeof one'sneighbors andof

God.

"It isnecessary touprootoneself.

Cut

down

thetree and

make

a cross

and

carry itforever after."

Especially atthe

moment when

themajorityof

mankind

is

"submerged

in materialism,"

Simone Weil

feltshe could not detachherself

from them

by

undergoingbaptism.

To

be able to love

them

as they were, in all their blindness, she

would

haveto

know

them

asthey were; andto

know

them, 7

(20)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

she

would

haveto

go

among

them

disguisedinthegarments oftheir

own

disbelief. In so far as Christianity had

become

an exclusive sect, it

would

haveto be

remade

into a "total Incarnationoffaith,"haveto

become

truly "catholic," cath-olic

enough

toinclude the

myths

of the dark-skinned peo-ples

from

a

world untouched

by

the

Churches

of the

West,

aswell as the insights of post-Enlightenment liberals,

who

could see in organized religion only oppression

and

bitter-ness andpride.

". . . in our present situation," she wrote, "universality

. . . has tobe

fully explicit."

And

that explicit universality, she felt,

must

find amouthpiece in a

new

kind ofsaint, for "today it is notnearly

enough

merely to beasaint, but

we

must

havethesaintliness

demanded by

the present

moment,

a

new

saintliness, itself also without precedent."

The new

kind of saint

must

possess a special "genius," capable of

blending Christianity and Stoicism, the love of

God

and "filial piety for the

city of the world"; a passive sort of

"genius" that

would

enable

him

to act as a "neutral

me-dium," like water, "indifferent to all ideas without excep-tion, evenatheism and materialism . . ."

Simone

Weil

feltthat she could be only the forerunner

and

foreteller ofsuchasaint; forher, humility forbade her thinking of herself as

one

capable of a

"new

revelation of the universe and

human

destiny . . . the unveiling of a

largeportion of truth

and

beauty hithertohidden..."

Yet

sheis

precisely thesaint she prophesied!

Despite hermodesty, shespoke sometimes as ifshe

were

aware

that there

was

manifest in the circumstances of her birth (she had been borninto an agnosticfamily ofJewish

(21)

INTRODUCTION

descent) a special providence, a clue to a special mission.

While

it

was

true, she argued in her letters to Catholic friends,thatthe earlierSaintshad ail lovedthe

Church and

had

beenbaptized into it,

on

the other hand, they

had

all

beenborn

and

brought

up

intheChurch,asshe had not."I should betray the truth," she protested, "that is to say, the aspect of the truth thatIsee,if Ileftthepoint,

where

Ihave

been since

my

birth, atthe intersection of Christianity

and

everything that is not Christianity."

It

must

not be thoughtthat she

was

even troubled

by

the question offormally

becoming

a Christian; itvexed her

de-voutCatholic friends and for theirsakes shereturned again

and

again to the problem; but, as for herself, she

was

at peace.

Toward

the

end

of her life, the mystic vision

came

to her almostdaily, andshe didnothaveto

wonder

(insuch matters, shelikedtosay,

one

doesnot believe ordisbelieve; one

knows

or does not

know)

if there

were

salvation out-side an organized sect; she

was

a living witness that the visible

Church and

the invisible congregation of the saints areneverone."Ihaveneverforasecond hadthefeelingthat

God

wanted

me

in the

Church

I never doubted....

Ibelieve that

now

it can be concluded that

God

does not

want

me

in theChurch."

Itisbecauseshe

was

capable ofremaining

on

the

thresh-old of organized religion, "without moving, quite still...

indefinitely

..."

that

Simone Weil

speaks toallof us with specialauthority,an Outsidertooutsiders,our kind ofsaint,

whom

we

have needed (whether

we

have

known

itor not) "asaplague-stricken

town

needs doctors."

To

what

then doesshe bear witness?

To

the uses of exile

(22)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

and

suffering, to the glory of annihilation

and

absurdity,

to theunforeseenmiracle of love.

Her

life

and

work

form

asingle document, a

document which

we

canstill notread clearly, thoughclearly enough, perhaps, for ourneeds.

On

theonehand, the story of

Simone

Weil'slifeisstillguarded

by

reticence; and

on

the other hand, her thought

comes

to usinfragmentary form. She completed

no

large-scale

work;

she published in her lifetime

no

intimate testimony to the secretreligious life that

made

of her last

few

years a series of experiences perhaps unequaled since St. Theresa and St.

John

of the Cross. If she has left

any

detailed account of those experiences

we

have notyet seen it.

Since her death, fourvolumesof her

work

havebeen

pub-lished in France.

La

Pesanteur et la

Grace

(Gravity

and

Grace),is a selection

from

herdiaries, chosen and topically rearranged

by

Gustave

Thibon;

the effectis that of a

mod-ern

Penseesno

whole

vision, but a related, loosely linked

body

of aphorisms, always illuminating and direct,

some-times extraordinarily acute.

We

do

not

know,

of course,

what M.

Thibon

has chosen to omit; and he has not even told us

how

large aproportion of the notebooks he has

in-cludedin hisselection.

U

Enr

a ci77e7M 721

(The

Need

for Roots) is the longest single piece left

by Simone

Weil.

Begun

at the request of the Free French

Government

in exile, it takes off

from

a consideration of the religious and social principles

upon

which

a truly Christian

French

nation might be built

and

touches

upon

such subjects as the humanizing of factory

work,

the need for

freedom

ofpurely speculative thought,

and

the necessity forexpunging

from

our books a false no-10

(23)

INTRODUCTION

don

of the heroic

which makes

us all guilty of the rise of Hitler.Itisafascinating

though uneven

book,in parts ridic-ulous, in

pans

profound, but motivated throughout

by

the pity andlove

Simone

Weil

felt in contemplating a society thathad

made

ofthe apparatus of

government

an

oppressive

machine

by

separating the secularand religious.

The

thirdbook, of

which

the present

volume

isa transla-tion,isin

many

ways

the

most

representativeand appealing ofthethree. Itis not,of course, awhole, buta chance col-lection, entrusted to Father Perrin during the time just before

Simone

Weil's departure for America. It includes

some

material, originally written as early as 1937,

though

recastinthe final years of her life;but in the

main

it repre-sents the

typicalconcerns of theend of

Simone

Weil's life, aftershehad reachedahavenofcertainty.

Among

the

docu-ments

(which survived a confiscation

by

the Gestapo) are six letters, all but one written to Father Perrin, of

which

letter IV, the "Spiritual Autobiography," is of special

im-portance.

Among

the essays, the meditation

on

the Pater

Noster

possessesgreatinterest, forthis

was

thesingleprayer

by

which Simone Weil

attained almost daily the Divine

Vision of

God;

and the second section of the study called

"Forms

of theImplicit

Love

of

God,"

I find the

most

mov-ing

and

beautiful piece of writing

Simone Weil

ever did.

Another volume

of her collected essays

and

meditations,

under

the title

La

ConnaissanceSurnaturelle (Supernatural

Knowledge)

has recently appeared in France,

and

several other volumes

made up

of extracts

from

her notebooks are tobe published soon.

Simone

Weil

apparentlyleft be-hind her a large

body

of fragments, drafts, and unrevised

(24)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

sketches,

which

a

world

thatfinds inher

most

casual

words

insights

and

illuminations will not be content to leave in manuscript.

Several of her

poems and

prose pieces, not included in

any

ofthesevolumes, have beenpublishedinvarious

French

magazines (notably in Cahiers de

Sud) and

three or four of herpolitical essays have appearedinthiscountry in Poli-tics.

But

the only really consequential study, aside

from

those inthe three books, is her splendid,

though

absurdly

and

deliberately partial, interpretation of the Iliad,

which

has been excellently translated into English

by

Mary

Mc-Carthy and

published in pamphlet

form

under the title of

The

Iliad:or,the

Poem

of Force.

These

arethe chief sourcesof her thought; andthe intro-ductions to the volumes edited

by M. Thibon

and

Father Perrin provide, along withbrieferpersonaltributesprinted atthetimeofher death, thebasicinformation

we

have about herlife.In a

profound

sense, herlifeisherchief

work, and

without

some

notion of her biography it is impossible to

know

her totalmeaning.

On

the otherhand, her

books

are extensionsofherlife;theyarenotliterature,not eveninthe sense that the writings of a theologically oriented author

like Kierkegaard are literature.

They

are confessions

and

testimonies sometimes agonized cries or dazzled

exclama-tionsmotivated

by

the desire to say just

how

it

was

with her, regardless of all questions of

form

or beauty of style.

They

have, however, a

charm

of directness, an appealing purity of tone that

makes

itpossible toread

them (Simone

Weil

would

have hated to

acknowledge

it!) for the sheer pleasure of

watching

a subtle

mind

capture in

words

the

(25)

INTRODUCTION

most

elusive of paradoxes, or of contemplating an absolute love

strivingto

communicate

itselfinspiteof the clumsiness

oflanguage.

HER

LIFE

We

do

not

know,

as yet, a great deal about the actual facts of

Simone

Weil's life.

Any

attempt at biographical reconstruction runs

up

against the reticence and reserve of herparents,

who

arestill living,

and

even

more

critically, it

encounters her

own

desire to be

anonymous

to

deny

pre-ciselythose elementsinherexperience,

which

tothe biogra-pherare

most

interesting. She

was born

in 1909, into a fam-ilyapparentlysociallysecure (her father

was

adoctor)

and

"completely agnostic."

Though

her ancestors had been Jewish, the faith had quite disappeared in her immediate family,and

where

itflourishedstill

among

remoterrelatives, ithad

become

somethingcold,

oppressive,

and

meaninglessly legalistic to a degree that

made

Simone

Weil

all of herlife incapable of judging fairly the merits of Judaism. She ap-peared to have

no

sense of alienation

from

the general

community

connected with her Jewishness (though in

appearancesheseemstohavefittedexactlyapopular

stereo-type of the Jewish face), but

grew

up

with a feeling of belongingquite firmlyto a

world

whose

values

were

simply "French," that is to say, a combination of

Greek

and

sec-ularized Christian elements.

Even

as a child, she seems to have troubled her parents, to

whom

being comfortable

was

an

end

of life,

and

who

refused to orcould not understand her mission.

They

frus-trated again and again, with the greatest of

warmth

and

(26)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

good

will, her attempts toimmolate herself for thelove of

God.

Her

father

and

mother

came

to represent, inanalmost archetypal struggle with her, the

whole

solid bourgeois

world, to

whom

ahair shirtis ascandal, and sufferingonly a blight tobeeliminated

by

scienceand properfamilial care.

Yet

shelovedher parentsasdearlyas they lovedher,

though

she

was from

childhoodquiteincapable of overt

demonstra-tions ofaffection.

At

the age of five,she refused to eat sugar, aslong as the soldiers at the front

were

not able to get it.

The

war

had

broughtthe sense of

human

miseryintoher protected milieu for the first time, and her typical pattern of response

was

alreadyset: to

deny

herself

what

the

most

unfortunate

were

unable to enjoy.

There

is in herreaction, of course,

some-thing of the hopelessguilt ofone born into a favored posi-tion in a

society with sharp class distinctions.

Throughout

hercareer, there

was

tobe atouchof theabsurdinhereffort to identify herself utterly with the

most

exploited groups insociety

(whose

own

major

desire

was

to rise

up

into the class

from which

she

was

trying to abdicate), and being continually"rescued"

from

the suffering shesought

by

par-ents

and

friends.

A

littlelater inher childhood, she declared thatshe

would no

longer

wear

socks,while the childrenof

workers

had to

go

without them. This particular gesture, she

was

laterto admitin a typically scrupulous bit of

self-analysis,

might

have been

prompted

as

much

by

an urge to teaseher

mother

as

by

anunselfish desire toshare thelotof the poor.

At

fourteen, she passedthroughthe darkestspiritualcrisis of herlife, feeling herself pushed to the very verge of

(27)

sui-INTRODUCTION

cide

by

anacute sense ofherabsolute unworthiness,

and

by

theonslaughtofmigraine headachesofan unbearable inten-sity.

The

headaches neverlefther afterward,noteveninher

moments

of extremest joy; her very experiences of Divine

Love would come

toher strainedthroughthat omnipresent pain

which

attackedher, asshelikedtosay, "atthe intersec-tion of

body

andsoul."She

came

latertothink ofthat

tor-ment, intensified

by

the physical hardships to

which

she compulsively exposed herself, as a special

gift;but in early adolescence, it

was

to her only a visible

and outward

sign

of herinnermisery ather

own

total lack oftalent.

The

root of her troublesseemsto havebeen her relation-shipwith herbrother,amathematicalprodigy, beside

whose

brilliance she felt herself stumbling and stupid.

Her

later

academic successes

and

the almost universal respect ac-corded her real intelligence

seem

never to have convinced her thatshe had

any

intellectual talent.

The

chance phrase of a visitor to her mother, overheard

when

she

was

quite

young,

had broughtthe

whole problem

to a head.

Simone

Weil

never forgot the words.

"One

is genius itself," the

woman

hadsaid,pointingtotheboy; andthen, indicating

Si-mone,

"the other beauty!" It is hard to say

whether

she

was

more

profoundly disturbed

by

the imputation of a beauty she did not possess, or

by

the implicit denial of genius.

Certainly, forever afterward, she did her best to destroy

what

in her

was

"beautiful" and superficially charming, to turn herselfinto the antimask of the appealing

young

girl.

The

faceinher photographs is absolutein its refusal to be charming, anexaggeration,almosta caricatureof the

(28)

WAITING

FOR GOD

lectualJewess. Inasentenceor two, FatherPerrin recreates herforusinher typicalcostume: the oversize

brown

beret, the shapeless cape, the large, floppy shoes,

and

emerging

from

thisdisguise,theclumsy, imperiousgestures.

We

hear, too, theunmusical voice that completes the ensemble,

mo-notonous, almost merciless in its insistence.

Only

in her writing, is

Simone

Weil

betrayed into charm; in her life, she

made

aprinciple of avoiding it.

"A

beautiful

woman,"

she writes, "looking at her image in the mirror

may

very well believe theimage is herself.

An

ugly

woman

knows

it isnot."

But though

her very appearance declares her physical humility,

we

are likely to be misled about

Simone

Weil's attitude

toward

her

own

intelligence. Father Perrin tells us that henever

saw

her yield a pointin an

argument

with

anybody,

but

on

theother hand, he is aware, as

we

should

be, too, of her

immense

humbleness in the realm of ideas.

Never

was

she able to believe that she truly possessed the quality she

saw

so spectacularly in her

own

brother, the kind of "genius" that

was

honestly tobe enviedin sofar as itpromised not merely "exteriorsuccess"butalso access to thevery

"kingdom

oftruth."

She did not

commit

suicide, but she passed

beyond

the temptation without

abandoning

her abysmal sense of her

own

stupidity. Instead, she learned painfully the uses of

stupidity.

To

lookatamathematical

problem

one has

inex-cusablymissed, she writes, is tolearnthe true discipline of humility. In the contemplation of our crimes or our sins, evenofouressentialpronenesstoevil,therearetemptations topride, butin thecontemplationof thefailures of our

(29)

INTRODUCTION

telligence, thereisonly degradation

and

the senseofshame.

To

know

that

one

ismediocreIs"tobe

on

thetrue

way/'

Besides,

when

one

has

no

flair for

geometry

(itis inter-esting that her examples

come

always

from

the field of her brother's special

competence)

the

working

of a

problem

becomes

not the really irrelevant pursuit of an "answer," buta trainingin"attention,"

which

isthe essenceofprayer.

And

thisinturn opens to usthe sourceof ahigher kind of genius,

which

has nothing to

do

with natural talent

and

everything to

do

with Grace.

"Only

a kind ofperversity canforce the friends of

God

to deprive themselves of gen-ius,becauseitis

enough

for

them

to

demand

itof their Fa-ther in the

name

of Christ, to have a superabundance of genius..."

Yet

even thisfinal consideration never

brought

her absolute peace.

She wrote toward

the

end

of her life thatshecouldnever readthe parable of the"barrenfigtree" withoutashudder, seeinginthefigurealwaysapossible por-traitofherself,naturallyimpotent,

and

yet

somehow,

inthe inscrutable plan of

God,

cursed for thatimpotence.

However

she

may

havefailedher

own

absolute standards, shealways seemstohavepleasedherteachers.

At

theEcole

Normale

Superieure,

where

shestudied

from

1928to 1931, finally attainingher agregee

de

philosophic at the ageof22,

she

was

a student of the philosopher Alain,

who

simply

would

notbelieve the reportof herearly deathyears

after-ward.

"She

will

come

back

surely," he kept repeating. "It

isn't true!" It was, perhaps,

under

his instruction that the love ofPlato, so importantin herthought,

was

confirmed inheronce

and

forall.

But

atthat pointof hercareershe

had been

influenced

by

17

(30)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

Marx

as well as the

Greek

philosophers;

and

it

was

as

an

earnest

and committed

radical,

though

one

who

had

never joined a particularpoliticalparty, that shetook

up

herfirst teaching job at

Le

Puy. It

was

a time for radicals-those utterly bleak years at the pit of a

world-wide

depression.

She

seems,ina

way

notuntypicalofthe left-wing intellec-tual in a small town,to have horrified the

good

citizens of

Le Puy

by

joining the

workers

in their sports,

marching

with

them

in theirpicket lines,taking part withthe

unem-ployed in their pick

and

shovel

work,

and refusing to eat

more

thantherationsof those

on

relief,distributing her sur-plusfood to the needy.

The

bourgeois

mind

seemsto have

found

it asabsurdforthis

awkward

girl tobe playingball

with

workers, asto

be

half-starving herselfbecauseof

prin-cipleshardto understand.

As

forcryingfor a

Revolution!

A

superintendent ofinstruction

was

called into threaten

Simone

Weil

with revocation of her teacher's license, at

which

she declared proudlythat she

would

considersuch a revocation "the

crown

of her career!"

There

is a note of false bravadointhe response, betrayinga desireto

become

a"cause," toattaina spectacular

martyrdom.

Itisa

common

flawin the revolutionary activity of the

young;

but

fortu-nately for

Simone

Weil,thiskind of denouement, of

which

she

would

have been

ashamed

later,

was

deniedher.

She

was

only a

young

girl, harmless,

and

her license

was

not re-voked. Irked at the implied slur, perhaps,

and

certainly dissatisfied ingeneralwith halfwayparticipationintheclass struggle ofa teacher-sympathizer, shedecided to

become

a

worker once and

forall,

by

taking a jobattheRenault auto plant.

(31)

INTRODUCTION

It is hard to

know how

to judge the venture.

Undoubt-edly, there is in it

somethinga little ridiculous: the resolve ofthe Vassar girl of all lands to "share the experience" of the

working

class;

and

theinevitable refusal behindthat re-solve to face

up

to the fact that the

freedom

to choose a worker's life,

and

the consciousness of that choice,

which

can never be sloughedoff,

make

thedreamed-oftotal

iden-tification impossible.

And

yet for the sake of that absurd

vision,

Simone

Weil

suffered

under

conditions exacerbated

by

her sensibility

and

physical weakness

beyond

anything theordinary

worker

had to bear; the job "enteredinto her body," and the ennui and misery ofworking-class life en-tered into her soul,

making

of hera "slave," in a sense she

could only understandfullylater,

when

herreligious illumi-nation had come.

She

was

always willingto take the step

beyond

the

triv-ially silly;

and

the ridiculous pushed far enough, absurdity

compounded, becomes

something else the

Absurd

asa re-ligiouscategory, the

madness

of the

Holy

fool beside

which

the

wisdom

of this

world

is revealed as folly. This point

Simone Weil came

to understand quite clearly.

Of

the im-plicit forms of the love of

God,

she said, ". . . in a sense

they are absurd, they are

mad,"

and this she

knew

to be

their special claim.

Even

unhappiness, she learned, inorder to be pure

must

be a littleabsurd.

The

very superiority of Christoverall themartyrsisthathe is not anythingso

sol-emn

asa

martyr

atall,buta"slave," acriminal

among

crimi-nals, "only a little

more

ridiculous.

For

unhappiness is ridiculous."

(32)

WAITING

FOR

GOD

An

attackof pleurisyfinallybrought

Simone

Weil's fac-tory experience to an

end

(there

were

always her parents waiting to rescue her), but having rested fora while, just

long

enough

to regain

some

slightmeasure of strength, she

set off for Spain to support the Loyalists,

vowing

all the

whilethat she

would

notever learntouse the

gun

they gave her.

She

talked about Spain with thegreatestreluctance in later years, despite the fact, or perhaps because it

was

un-doubtedly forher, asfor

many

in her generation, acritical experience: the efflorescence

and

the destruction of the rev-olutionary dream.

From

within

and

without the Marxist

hope was

defeated in a kind of

model

demonstration, a

paradigm

for believers.

Simone Weil

was

fond of quoting the

Homeric

phrase about "justice, that fugitive

from

the

camp

of the victors" butin those yearsit

was

absent

from

the

camp

of victor and vanquished alike.

Not

even defeat could purify the revolution!

While

the struggle in Spain sputtered

toward

its close,

Simone Weil

endured a personal catastrophe even

more

anticlimactic;she

was

wounded by

accident!

The

fatethat preserved herthroughoutherlife for the antiheroicheroism of her actual death, broughtthis episode, too, to a bathetic conclusion.

Concerned

with the possibilities of

combining

participation and nonviolence, pondering the eternal, she

forgotthe "real"

world

ofmissteps and boiling oil, and in-eptly

burned

herself, a victim of that clumsiness

which

seems to have been an essential aspect of her denial of the physicalself.

Badly

hurtand poorly caredfor, she

was

res-cued

from

afield hospital

by

herparents once

more

com-ing

between

herand her desiredagony!

(33)

INTRODUCTION

The

Spanish adventure

was

herlast purelypolitical

ges-ture; afterward, during the

Second

World

War,

she

was

to

work up

some

utterly impractical plan for being para-chuted into France to carry spiritual solace to the fighters inthe

underground

resistance;

and

she

was

evento consider at one point going to the Soviet Union,

where

she could doubtless not have lived in

freedom

for a

month.

Among

the

Communists

in France she had been

known

as a

Trot-skyite,

and

had once beenthreatenedwithphysical violence for delivering ananti-Stalinist report ata trade union con-vention.

But

ata

moment when

theRussians

were

retreating

before the

German

attack,she felt obliged to

"add

a coun-terweight/'inorderto restore that equilibrium

which

could alone

make

life here

below

bearable.

One

can barely im-agine her in the field with the

Red

Army,

this quixotic, suffering "friend of

God,"

flanked

by

the self-assured killersof "Fascist Beasts/'

and

carryinginher

hand

the

gun

that

would

doubtless have

blown

off her fingers

had

she triedto fire it.

These

later projects were, as their very "impossibility"

attests, different inkind

from

her earlypractical ventures: the picketing with the

unemployed,

the participation in Spain. She had passed into the realm of the politics of the absurd, ofmetapolitics,having decided that"the revolution

isthe opiate of the people/'

and

that thesocial considered in itself is "a trap of traps...an ersatz divinity... ir-remediably the

domain

of the devil."

The

lure of thesocial she believed to be herspecial temptation. Against the love ofselfshe

was armored

by

hervery temperament.

"No

one

(34)

WAITING

FOR GOD

loves himself," she

wrote

in her journal.

"Man

wants

to be an egoist

and

cannot."

But

a nostalgia forcollective action

seemed

ever

on

the point of

overwhelming

her defenses.

Simply

to join together with others in

any group

whatso-ever

would

have beenforher"delicious." "I

know

thatifat

this

moment

Ihadbefore

me

a

group

of

twenty

young

Ger-mans

singing

Nazi

songs in chorus," she once said, "a part of

my

soul

would

instantly

become

Nazi

"Yet, the

"we"

can lead

away

from

God,

she

knew,

as dangerouslyas the "I." "Itis

wrong

to bean 'I,' butitis

worse

to be a 'we,'

"

she

warned

herself.

"The

city gives us the feeling of being at

home.

Cultivate the feeling ofbeingat

home

in exile.'*

Yet

charity took her continually backinto the

world

of social action. "Misery

must

be eliminated inso far as pos-sible

from

lifein society,formiseryisusefulonlyin respect to grace,andsocietyisnotasociety of theelect.

There

will

always be

enough

misery for theelect." Ifthereis a certain inconsistencyin herposition, itis easyto forgive.

Even

the

"wrong"

politics of her revolutionary

youth

she

would

not write off as

wholly

mistaken; she never repented her early radicalism, understanding it as a providential discipline, through

which

she had

been

unconsciouslylearning

how

to emancipate her imagination

from

its embroilment with the social. "Meditation

on

thesocial

mechanism

isa purification

of the first importance in this regard.

To

contemplate the socialisas

good

a

means

ofpurification as retiring

from

the world.

That

is

why

1

was

not

wrong

instayingwithpolitics forso long."

It

was

after her Spanish experience that

Simone

Weil

(35)

INTRODUCTION

reached the critical point of conversion; but the decisive event in herspiritual education had been, she always felt, her

work

inthe factory.

She

had not

known

what

she

was

seeking at the machine, but she had

found

it nonetheless:

branded with the red

mark

of the slave, she had

become

incapable ofresisting"the religionof slaves.*7 In one sense,

Simone

Weil

insisted afterward, she had not needed to be

converted;she

had

always been implicitly, in "secret" even

from

her lower self, a Christian; but she had never knelt, she had neverprayed, she had neverentered aChurch,she had never even posedtoherselfthe question of

God's

exist-ence. "I

may

say that never in

my

life have I 'sought for

God/

" she said

toward

the end of her life; but she

had

been

allthetimewaiting,withoutdaring to define

what

she awaited.

Taken

off

by

her parentstoPortugal to recuperate

from

herburns and her chagrin, she

made

her

way

to Solesmes,

where,listening toaGregorian chant at the

moment

when

her migraine

was

at its worst, she experienced the

joy

and

bitterness ofChrist's passion as a real event, though stillso abstractlythatshe didnotattachtoit

any

name.

And

there, too, shehad

met

a

young

English Catholic,

who

introduced her to the

work

of the British metaphysical poets of the seventeenth century, and so gave hera

key

to the beyond, in the place of conventional prayer to

which

she had not yet beenable toturn.

Like

no

saintbeforeher,

Simone

Weil

distrustedthe con-ventional apparatus of piety

and

grace;

and

itis typical of

herrole thatit

was

through forms ofart acceptable to the 23

(36)

WAITING FOR GOD

most

skeptical anti-Christian (Gregorian chant

and

meta-physical poetry

two

of the special rediscoveries of

our

irreligious time) that she approached her encounter with

God.

"Ina

moment

ofintense physical suffering," she tells

us,

"when

I

was

forcing myself to feel love, but without desiring to give a

name

to thatlove, I felt,without beingin

any

way

prepared forit (forI

had

never readthe mystical writers) apresence

more

personal,

more

certain,

more

real

thanthatofa

human

being,

though

inaccessibletothe senses

and

theimagination "

She

had beenrepeating toherself

a piece

by

George

Herbert,

when

the presence came. "I used tothinkI

was

merelyrecitingitas a beautiful

poem,"

shewrites, "but without

my

knowing

it the recitation

had

the virtue ofa prayer." It is

worth

quoting the

poem

as a whole, for its

imagery

is vital, as

we

shall see later, to an understanding of

Simone

Weil'sessentialthought.

Love

bade

me

welcome:

yet

my

soul

drew

back,

Guiltieoflust

and

sinne.

But

quick-ey'd Love, observing

me

grow

slack

From

my

firstentrancein,

Drew

nearer tome, sweetlyquestioning, IfIlack'd

any

thing.

A

guest, Ianswer'd,

worthy

tobehere:

Love

said,

You

shall behe.

Itheunkinde,ungratefull?

Ah

my

deare, Icannot look

on

thee.

Love

took

my

hand,

and

smiling did reply,

Who

made

theeyes butI? 24

(37)

INTRODUCTION

Truth

Lord, butIhave marr'd them: let

my

shame

Go

where

itdoth deserve.

And know

you

not, sayesLove,

who

boretheblame?

My

deare,thenI will serve.

You

must

sit

down,

sayesLove,

and

taste

my

meat:

So

Ididsit

and

eat.

Even

aftersuch anexperience,thisastonishinglystubborn friendof

God

could notfor

more

thanfiveyearsbring her-selfconventionally topray (though shetellsus thatin 1937 she knelt for the first time, at the shrine in Assisi), finally persuadingherselftosay the PaterNosterdailywithso spe-cial a concentration that apparently at each repetition, Christ himself "descended

and

took her." Itis her

remark-able

freedom

from, her actual shamefastness before the

normal

procedures of Christian worship that lend a special authority to

Simone

Weil's testimony.

Nothing comes

to

herasaconvention ora platitude; it is asifsheis driven to reinventeverything

from

the beginning.

Of

her first

mys-tical experience shewrites,

"God

had mercifullyprevented

me

from

reading the mystics, so that it

would

be clear to

me

that I had not fabricated an absolutely unexpected en-counter." Surely,

no

mystic has ever beenso scrupulously his

own

skeptical examiner.

Afterward,

Simone Weil found

in St.

John

of theCross

and

the Bhagavad-Gita accounts of encounters similar to her

own;

andsheeven decided

upon

rereading her old

mas-ter Plato in the light of her

new

experience that he, too,

must

have achievedthe mystical union. Beforeher

own

en-counter, she

had

thought that all such alleged experiences

(38)

WAITING

FOR GOD

could be only a turning of the natural orientation of the sexual desire

toward

an imaginary object labeled

Goda

degradingself-indulgence, "lower thanadebauch."

To

dis-tinguishher

own

secretlife

from

suchersatzmysticism

be-came

oneof the

main

objects of her thought.

After herfirst mystical union, the inner existence of

Si-mone

Weil

becomes

much

more

important than anything

thatsuperficially happens to her.

Even

the

War

itself, the grossestfact of ourrecent history,shrinksin the

new

per-spective. Nonetheless,

Simone Weil

continued to

immerse

herself in the misery of daily life. Driven

by

herconstant desirenotto separateherself

from

themisfortune ofothers, she refused to leaveParis untilit

was

declared an

open

city, after

which

she

moved

with herparents to Marseilles.

But

there she

was

Caught

by

the anti-Jewish laws ofthe

Vichy

Government

which

made

itimpossible forher to teach

any

longer; and so she

went

to

Gustave Thibon,

a lay theo-logian, in charge of a Catholic agricultural colony in the

South of France.

Under

his guidance, she

worked

in the vineyards with the peasants

(whom

she astonished

and

bored with lectures

on

the Upanishads!), sleeping as they

slept,

and

eating their

meager

fare until her feeble health

broke

down

once more.

M.

Thibon

at first

immensely

mis-trustedher motives a radical intellectual "returning to the soil!" then

became

closely attached to her,

and

it

was

to

him

that she entrusted her journals

and

occasionaljottings,

which

he finally decided to publish afterher death despite herrequest to the contrary.

The

chief external influence

on Simone Weil

duringthese lastyearsof herspiritual progress

was

not

M.

Thibon, but

References

Related documents

All records for LASIK procedures from one single cen- ter without patient identifiers were extracted from the Optical Express electronic medical record system using the

We have shown that due to reconstruction of stationary distribution of the vacancy concentration field caused by the noise effect, the morphology of patterns changes essentially:

Since then the Inland Revenue has ignored the unanimous decision of the House of Lords that the use of personal portfolio bonds as part of a long-term

Picture-perfect beaches easily accessible by bus or island tour boat  the Monastery at Evangelistrias  tavernas and restaurants in Skiathos Town..

The 12.88 percent growth rate of per capita income for Sierra County between 2014 and 2018 was higher compared to the state’s growth rate of 11.91 percent and lower compared to

Keywords: phonetic (homophonic, homophonetic) translation, equivalence in trans- lation, sound in poetry, Russian poetic translations of the 19th and 20th centuries.. The problem

- It may be now, Section 42 (4) (a) has expressly provided that this is a matter only for the court which passed the decree, and the transferee court has no power to order execution

In order to solve the most pressing debt crisis, the separation of government function from enterprise must be firstly implemented, while ensuring safety and stability of the