COPYRIGHT, IpJI,BY G. P.PUTNAM'S SONS
Capricorn Books Edition, 1959.
Library of Congress Catalogue
CardNumber59-14857
Contents
BIOGRAPHICAL
NOTE
VllINTRODUCTION BY
LESLIE A. FIEDLER 3LETTERS
LETTER
I HESITATIONSCONCERNING BAPTISM
43LETTER
IISAME
SUBJECT
52LETTER
IIIABOUT HER DEPARTURE
58LETTER
IV SPIRITUALAUTOBIOGRAPHY
61LETTER
VHER INTELLECTUAL VOCATION
84LETTER
VI LASTTHOUGHTS
88ESSAYS
REFLECTIONS
ON THE
RIGHT USE OFSCHOOL
STUDIESWITH
A
VIEW TO THE
LOVE OFGOD
105THE
LOVE OF GOD
AND
AFFLICTION 117FORMS
OFTHE
IMPLICITLOVE
OFGOD
137THE
LOVE
OFOUR
NEIGHBOR
139LOVE
OFTHE
ORDER
OFTHE
WORLD
158THE LOVE
OF RELIGIOUS PRACTICES 181FRIENDSHIP 2OO
IMPLICIT
AND
EXPLICITLOVE
2O8CONCERNING
THE OUR
FATHER
216'Biographical
7\7ote*
SIMONE
WEIL
was born
inParison February
3, 1909.The
houseof herbirth in theBoulevard de Strasbourghas since been pulleddown
tomake room
for the rue de Metz.Thanks
to herbrother Andre,who
was
her elderby
three years, shewas
exceptionally advanced in herknowledge
of literatureand
science.At
six she could quote passages of Racineby
heart,and
although herstudieswere
constantly interruptedasaresultof theFirstWorld
War,
sheobtained her baccalaureat eslettreswith distinction inJune, 1924,at the age offifteen.The
president of theboard of examiners,who
was
a specialist in the literature of the earlyMiddle
Ages, gave her 19 out of 20 afterheroral test.
During
her year of philosophy sheworked
under
La
Senne; then she had Alaint as her masterfor
two
years at the CollegeHenri
IV
when
she prepared for the competi-tiveentrance examinationof theEcoleNormale.
Alain,who
*This
note,provided bythe Frenchpublishers,replaces the Introduc-tion and notesby the Reverend J. M. Perrin, which are withdrawn at their request.
tPseudonymofthewell-known Frenchphilosopherandessayist,Emile AugusteChartier (1868-).
BIOGRAPHICAL
NOTE
recognizedthatshehadphilosophicalgenius
and
saw
inher "apower
of thoughtwhich
was
rare," followed herde-velopment
with attentiveand
kindly interest, noting, how-ever, that shehad
to beon
her guard against too closereasoning expressed in almost impenetrable language
and
that, inthe end, "shehad beenwillingtoturnfrom
thedeep abstract subtletieswhich were
agame
forherand
to train herself in directanalysis."Sheentered theEcole
Normale
Superieurein1928,leftas aqualifiedteacherof philosophyin 1931,andwas
appointedto the secondary school for girls at
Le
Puy. There,from
December,
1931 until the spring of 1932 she gave public proof of heruncompromising
oppositiontoward
official compulsion ofany
sorthelpingand encouragingthe unem-ployedworkmen
of thetown by
hermarked sympathy and
by
taking direct action against themunicipal authorities.She
had friends in thegroup
of the Revolution Prole-tarienne,andin 1932 shebegan
tocontribute tothisreview.She
was
thus given an opportunity of expressing in clearand
accurate terms and with a realknowledge
ofhuman
problems hermain
ideasand
herfeelingaboutthe condition oftheworkers.Appointed
to aschool atAuxerre
inOctober, 1932,and
in 1933 tooneat Roanne, shethen decided totake a year's leave so that shecouldexperiencefullytheworking
people's life towhich
she had alreadytried to accustom herselfby
working
inthefieldsof the Jura duringthesummer
months.Having
takenajobintheRenault works,she hiredaroom
in aneighboring houseand
strove, in spite of the headachesand
delicatehealth shehad
always had to contend with, toBIOGRAPHICAL
NOTE
avoid anythingthatcould
make
herlotdifferintheslightest degreefrom
thatof hercompanions
intheworkshop.
When
herleavecame
toanend
in 1935, she againtook a teaching post, this time at the girls' secondary school at Bourges.She
leftinthesummer
of 1936 togo
to Barcelona inthebeginningofAugust,She
wanted
tobe
able tojudge for herself of the strugglebetween
the"Reds" and
the "Francoites."During
the followingOctober
she returned to Franceafterhaving sharedthesufferings of theRepublican
Army
forseveralweeks
on
theCatalonianfrontand
havingexperi-encedinthevery depthsofher beingthe uttercalamityof war.
Another
period ofleave, this timeon
accountof illness, prevented herfrom
takingup
before 1937 an appointmentat the secondary school for girls at Saint Quentin.
Once
more,inJanuary, 1938,herhealth obligedherto stop
work-inguntilthetime
when
theSecond
World
War
broke out.On
June
13, 1940, she decidedto leave Parisand
settled atMarseillesinOctober
ofthesame
year,with herfamily,In June, 1941, a friend introduced her to the
Reverend
FatherPerrin,
who
was
then attheDominican Convent
in Marseillesand who,
two
years later,was
to bearrestedby
the Gestapo. Father Perrin introduced her toGustave
Thibon
withwhom
she stayed for a while in Ardeche.There, once
more
impelledby
her longing tosharein alife ofdirectcontactwiththesoil,sheengaged
inmanual work,
either inthefieldsduringthe harvest, orinthevineyardsat thetimeofthe grape-gathering.She
didnoton
thataccount giveup
any
of herstudies of philosophy,whether
Greek
orBIOGRAPHICAL
NOTE
Hindu, and
went
on widening
herknowledge
of Sanskrit.At
thesame
time hermystical tendenciesand
herpreoccu-pation with the notion of
God
became more
pronounced, leadinghertowrite thepageson
theOur
Fatherand on
theLove
ofGod
which
are tobe readfarther on.On
returning to Marseilles for the winter she continued her talksand
discussions with Father Perrin and at his re-quest sheexpounded
herthoughtson
Platoand
the Pythag-oreans to the circle that used tomeet
in the crypt of theDominican Convent
there.When
Father Perrinwas
chosenasSuperior at Moritpel-lier, inMarch,
1942, he did not lose contact withSimone
Weil.They
went
on
meeting, writingletters,and exchang-ing their views rightup
to the timewhen
Simone
leftFrance.
It
was
probablyon
May
15, 1942, that shewrote
thelong letter,which
she callsher "spiritual autobiography," to Fa-therPerrin, thenaway
on
ajourney.Her
boatleftthe porton
May
17. Shespent threeweeks
at Casablanca,inacamp
where
travelers in transitfrom
FrancetoAmerica
were
con-fined.
Here
she prepared a certainnumber
of additional papers.These
she senttoFatherPerrinasa spirituallegacy,and on
May
26, in alast letter of farewell, shecompleted
and added
to thatofMay
15.Soon
after reachingNew
York
at theend
of June, 1942,she received a call to serve
under
theFrench
provisionalgovernment and
left forEngland on
November
10.In
London
shewas
commissioned tomake
astudy of of-ficialdocuments;she outlined plansand wrote
alongBIOGRAPHICAL
KOTE
united,ofthe State
and
theindividual.*Shewanted
toshare the hardship of those shehadleftinFranceand
carriedthis to suchapointthat, although overtired and rundown,
she refused the extra nourishment orderedby
the doctorsand
keptstrictly to the rations to
which
hercompatriots inthe occupied zonewere
limited atthattime.The
stateof her healthbecame
somuch
worse
that, inthesecond fortnight of April, 1943, she
was
admitted to the MiddlesexHospital,whence
shewas
transferredin themid-dleof
August
to asanatoriumatAshford
inKent.The
lastsentence shewrote
inthenotebook found
afterherdeath was:
"The
most
important part of education to teach themeaning
of toknow
(inthe scientificsense)."The
whole
ofSimone
Weil
is contained in thesefew
words.
A
day
ortwo
later,on August
29, 1943, she diedat Ash-ford.The
correspondencehere published and theessayswhich
follow
were
all sentorgiven totheReverend
FatherPerrinby
Simone
Weil,atthetimewhen
shewas
stillabletocom-municate withhim.
In giving this collection of letters and essays the title of
WAITING
FORGOD,
the publisher has sought to suggest a favoritethoughtofSimone Weil which
she expressedintheGreek words
v UTUO^VT]: waitinginpatience.*Published as VEnracineinent (Gallimard, Paris, 1949)- E"g- trans.:
The NeedforRoots (G.P. Putnam'sSons,
New
York, 1952). xiintroduction
SINCE HER
DEATH,Simone
Weil
hascome
toseem
more
and
more
a special exemplar of sanctity for our time the Out-sider as Saint in an age of alienation, our kind of saint. In eight scantyears, thisyoung
Frenchwoman,
whom
scarcelyanyone
had heard of before her sacrificial death in exile atthe age of 34, has
come
to possessthe imagination ofmany
in the
Western
world. Catholic and Protestant, Christianand
Jew, agnostic and devout,we
have all turned to her with theprofound
conviction that themeaning
of her ex-perience is our meaning, that she is really ours.Few
ofus, to be sure,would
find nothing to dissentfrom
in her re-ligious thought; fewer stillwould
be capable of emulating the terrible purity of her life;none
could measure himself,without shame, againstthe absolute ethos
toward which
she aspired.And
yet she does notseem
strange to us, as other mystics and witnesses ofGod
haveseemed
strange; forthough
on onesideher life touchestheremote mysteries of the Divine Encounter,on
the otherit is rooted in aworld
with
which
we
are familiar.She
speaks oftheproblemsof belief inthe vocabularyof 3WAITING
FOR
GOD
the unbeliever, of thedoctrinesofthe
Church
inthewords
oftheunchurched.
The
askesis,the"darknight of thesoul,"through
which
she passed to certitude,isthemodern
intel-lectual's familiar pattern of attractiontoward and
disil-lusionmentwith
Marxism, the discipline ofcontemporary
politics.
The
day-to-daystruggles of tradeunionism, unem-ployment, the CivilWar
in Spain, the role of the Soviet Union, anarchism,and
pacifism these arethe determinants of herideas, theunforeseen roads that ledherto sanctity.Though
she passedfinallybeyond
politics,her thoughtbears totheend
themark
of herearlyinterests,asthe teachingof St.Paulisinfluencedby
hisRabbinicalschooling,orthatof St.Augustineby
histraining inrhetoric.Beforeher death, scarcely
any
ofSimone
Weil'sreligious writingshad been
published.To
those inFrance
who
thoughtofherstill,interms of herearlypolitical essays,asa
somewhat
unorthodox
Marxistmoving
toward
anarchism, theposthumous
Christianbooks must
havecome
asashock. Surely,no
"friendofGod"
inallListory,had
moved more
unwillinglytoward
themystic encounter.There
is in herearlier
work
no
sense ofa gropingtoward
the divine,no
promise ofholiness,
no
pursuitofa puritybeyond
thisworld
only a conventionally left-wing concern
with
the prob-lems ofindustrialization,renderedina toneatonce
extraor-dinarily inflexibleand
wonderfullysensitive.The
particularnote ofconviction inSimone
Weil'stesti-mony
arisesfrom
the feeling thatherrole as amysticwas
so unintended,one
forwhich
shehad
notinany
sense pre-pared.An
undertone of incredulity persists beneath her astonishing honesty: quite suddenlyGod
had
taken her,INTRODUCTION
radical, agnostic,
contemptuous
ofreligiouslifeandpractice asshehad observedit! She clung alwaystoher sense of be-ing an Outsideramong
the religious, to a feeling that her improbable approach had givenhera specialvocation,asan "apostle to the Gentiles," planted at "the intersection of Christianityand everythingthatisnotChristianity."She re-fused tobecome, inthetypical compensatory excessofthe convert,
more
of theChurch
than those born into it; shewould
noteven bebaptized,and
it isheruniqueposition, at
onceinand out ofinstitutionalized Catholicism, that deter-mines herspecial role and meaning.
To
thosewho
considerthemselveson
thesafe side of be-lief,sheteachestheuncomfortabletruththatthe onbeliefofmany
atheistsiscloser toatrue love ofGod
andatrue sense ofhisnature, thanthekind of easyfaithwhich, never hav-ing experiencedGod,
hangs a label bearing hisname on
some
childishfantasy or projection of the ego. Like Kierke-gaard, shepreachedtheparadoxofitsbeingeasierforanon-Christian to
become
a Christian, than for a "Christian" tobecome
one.To
thosewho
believe in a single Revelation,and
enjoythewarm
sensationof being savedinacozy
circleof friends, she
expounded
the doctrine of a gospel spreadin
many
"languages," ofa divineWord
sharedamong
rivalmyths, in each of
which
certain important truths, implicit elsewhere, aremade
explicit.For
those towhom
religionmeans
comfort and peace of mind, she brings the terriblereminderthatChristpromisednotpeace butthesword,
and
that his
own
lastwords were
a cry of absolute despair, the "/i, Eli, lama sabachthani!"which
is the true glory of Christianity.WAITING
FOR COD
But
she always considered that her chief missionwas
to thosestill"submerged
inmaterialism/' thatis,tomost
of us in a chaotic and disenchanted world.To
the unbelieverwho
has rathersmugly
despised the churchgoer for seeking aneasy consolation, she revealsthesecret of hisown
cow-ardice, suggesting that his agnosticism
may
itself be only anopiate,adodge
toavoid facing theterrorofGod's
realityand the awful burden of hislove.
She refused to cut herself off
from
anyone,by
refusing to identify herself completely withanyone
orany
cause.She rejected the temptation to
withdraw
into a congenial group, onceassociated with which, she could bedisowned
by
alloutside ofit. Sherather tookupon
herself the task ofsustainingall possible beliefs in their infinite contradictions
and
on
theirendless levelsof relevance; thesmugnessof the false elect, the materialism of the shallowly rebellious, self-deceitand hypocrisy, parochialism and atheismfrom
each she extracteditspartial truth,and enduredthelargerportion oferror. She chosetosubmitto akindof perpetualinvisible crucifixion; herfinal relationship toall those shewould
notdisown became
thatof the crucified to the cross.The
French
editors ofSimone
Weil's works, GustaveThibon, a lay theologian
who
was
also her friend, and Fa-ther Perrin, the nearest thing to a confessor she ever had, have both spoken of Sirnone Weil's refusal to be baptizedas a
mere
stage in her development, a nonessential flaw in her thinking,which, hadsheonly livedlonger,would
prob-ably have beenremedied.
M.
Thibon and
FatherPerrinare, of course, Catholics,and
speak as theymust
out of their great love for Mile Weil, and theirunderstandableINTRODUCTION
tion that such holinesscould not permanently have stayed outside of the
Church;
butfrom Simone
Weil'sown
point of view, her outsidenesswas
the very essence of herposi-tion. This is
made
especially clear in the present volume. "I feel," shewrote
once, "thatit isnecessary tome,pre-scribed forme, to bealone, an outsider and alienated
from
every
human
context whatsoever."And
on
anotherocca-sion, she jotted in her journal the self-reminder, "Preserve
your
solitude!"What
motivatedherwas no
selfish desiretowithdraw from
the ordinary concourse ofmen,
butpre-cisely the opposite impulse. She
knew
thatone
remains alienatedfrom
aparticularallegiance,notby
vainly attempt-ing todeny
all beliefs,butpreciselyby
sharingthem
all.To
have
become
rooted in the context of aparticular religion,Simone
Weil
felt,would
on
theone hand,have exposed her towhat
shecalls"the patriotism of theChurch," witha con-sequent blindness to the faults of herown
groupand
thevirtuesof others,
and
would,on
the other hand, have sep-arated herfrom
thecommon
condition here below,which
findsus all"outsiders,uprooted, inexile."
The
most
terribleof crimes is tocollaborate inthe uprooting of others in an already alienatedworld; butthe greatest ofvirtues isto up-root oneself for the sakeof one'sneighbors andof
God.
"It isnecessary touprootoneself.Cut
down
thetree andmake
a cross
and
carry itforever after."Especially atthe
moment when
themajorityofmankind
is
"submerged
in materialism,"Simone Weil
feltshe could not detachherselffrom them
by
undergoingbaptism.To
be able to lovethem
as they were, in all their blindness, shewould
havetoknow
them
asthey were; andtoknow
them, 7WAITING
FOR
GOD
she
would
havetogo
among
them
disguisedinthegarments oftheirown
disbelief. In so far as Christianity hadbecome
an exclusive sect, it
would
haveto beremade
into a "total Incarnationoffaith,"havetobecome
truly "catholic," cath-olicenough
toinclude themyths
of the dark-skinned peo-plesfrom
aworld untouched
by
theChurches
of theWest,
aswell as the insights of post-Enlightenment liberals,who
could see in organized religion only oppression
and
bitter-ness andpride.". . . in our present situation," she wrote, "universality
. . . has tobe
fully explicit."
And
that explicit universality, she felt,must
find amouthpiece in anew
kind ofsaint, for "today it is notnearlyenough
merely to beasaint, but
we
must
havethesaintlinessdemanded by
the presentmoment,
anew
saintliness, itself also without precedent."The new
kind of saint
must
possess a special "genius," capable ofblending Christianity and Stoicism, the love of
God
and "filial piety for thecity of the world"; a passive sort of
"genius" that
would
enablehim
to act as a "neutralme-dium," like water, "indifferent to all ideas without excep-tion, evenatheism and materialism . . ."
Simone
Weil
feltthat she could be only the forerunnerand
foreteller ofsuchasaint; forher, humility forbade her thinking of herself asone
capable of a"new
revelation of the universe andhuman
destiny . . . the unveiling of alargeportion of truth
and
beauty hithertohidden..."Yet
sheis
precisely thesaint she prophesied!
Despite hermodesty, shespoke sometimes as ifshe
were
aware
that therewas
manifest in the circumstances of her birth (she had been borninto an agnosticfamily ofJewishINTRODUCTION
descent) a special providence, a clue to a special mission.
While
itwas
true, she argued in her letters to Catholic friends,thatthe earlierSaintshad ail lovedtheChurch and
had
beenbaptized into it,on
the other hand, theyhad
allbeenborn
and
broughtup
intheChurch,asshe had not."I should betray the truth," she protested, "that is to say, the aspect of the truth thatIsee,if Ileftthepoint,where
Ihavebeen since
my
birth, atthe intersection of Christianityand
everything that is not Christianity."
It
must
not be thoughtthat shewas
even troubledby
the question offormallybecoming
a Christian; itvexed herde-voutCatholic friends and for theirsakes shereturned again
and
again to the problem; but, as for herself, shewas
at peace.Toward
theend
of her life, the mystic visioncame
to her almostdaily, andshe didnothavetowonder
(insuch matters, shelikedtosay,one
doesnot believe ordisbelieve; oneknows
or does notknow)
if therewere
salvation out-side an organized sect; shewas
a living witness that the visibleChurch and
the invisible congregation of the saints areneverone."Ihaveneverforasecond hadthefeelingthatGod
wanted
me
in theChurch
I never doubted....Ibelieve that
now
it can be concluded thatGod
does notwant
me
in theChurch."Itisbecauseshe
was
capable ofremainingon
thethresh-old of organized religion, "without moving, quite still...
indefinitely
..."
thatSimone Weil
speaks toallof us with specialauthority,an Outsidertooutsiders,our kind ofsaint,whom
we
have needed (whetherwe
haveknown
itor not) "asaplague-strickentown
needs doctors."To
what
then doesshe bear witness?To
the uses of exileWAITING
FOR
GOD
and
suffering, to the glory of annihilationand
absurdity,to theunforeseenmiracle of love.
Her
lifeand
work
form
asingle document, adocument which
we
canstill notread clearly, thoughclearly enough, perhaps, for ourneeds.On
theonehand, the story ofSimone
Weil'slifeisstillguardedby
reticence; andon
the other hand, her thoughtcomes
to usinfragmentary form. She completedno
large-scalework;
she published in her lifetime
no
intimate testimony to the secretreligious life thatmade
of her lastfew
years a series of experiences perhaps unequaled since St. Theresa and St.John
of the Cross. If she has leftany
detailed account of those experienceswe
have notyet seen it.Since her death, fourvolumesof her
work
havebeenpub-lished in France.
La
Pesanteur et laGrace
(Gravityand
Grace),is a selectionfrom
herdiaries, chosen and topically rearrangedby
GustaveThibon;
the effectis that of a mod-ernPenseesno
whole
vision, but a related, loosely linkedbody
of aphorisms, always illuminating and direct, some-times extraordinarily acute.We
do
notknow,
of course,what M.
Thibon
has chosen to omit; and he has not even told ushow
large aproportion of the notebooks he hasin-cludedin hisselection.
U
Enr
a ci77e7M 721(The
Need
for Roots) is the longest single piece leftby Simone
Weil.Begun
at the request of the Free FrenchGovernment
in exile, it takes offfrom
a consideration of the religious and social principlesupon
which
a truly ChristianFrench
nation might be builtand
touches
upon
such subjects as the humanizing of factorywork,
the need forfreedom
ofpurely speculative thought,and
the necessity forexpungingfrom
our books a false no-10INTRODUCTION
don
of the heroicwhich makes
us all guilty of the rise of Hitler.Itisafascinatingthough uneven
book,in parts ridic-ulous, inpans
profound, but motivated throughoutby
the pity andloveSimone
Weil
felt in contemplating a society thathadmade
ofthe apparatus ofgovernment
anoppressive
machine
by
separating the secularand religious.The
thirdbook, ofwhich
the presentvolume
isa transla-tion,isinmany
ways
themost
representativeand appealing ofthethree. Itis not,of course, awhole, buta chance col-lection, entrusted to Father Perrin during the time just beforeSimone
Weil's departure for America. It includessome
material, originally written as early as 1937,though
recastinthe final years of her life;but in the
main
it repre-sents thetypicalconcerns of theend of
Simone
Weil's life, aftershehad reachedahavenofcertainty.Among
thedocu-ments
(which survived a confiscationby
the Gestapo) are six letters, all but one written to Father Perrin, ofwhich
letter IV, the "Spiritual Autobiography," is of specialim-portance.
Among
the essays, the meditationon
the PaterNoster
possessesgreatinterest, forthiswas
thesingleprayerby
which Simone Weil
attained almost daily the DivineVision of
God;
and the second section of the study called"Forms
of theImplicitLove
ofGod,"
I find themost
mov-ing
and
beautiful piece of writingSimone Weil
ever did.Another volume
of her collected essaysand
meditations,under
the titleLa
ConnaissanceSurnaturelle (SupernaturalKnowledge)
has recently appeared in France,and
several other volumesmade up
of extractsfrom
her notebooks are tobe published soon.Simone
Weil
apparentlyleft be-hind her a largebody
of fragments, drafts, and unrevisedWAITING
FOR
GOD
sketches,
which
aworld
thatfinds inhermost
casualwords
insightsand
illuminations will not be content to leave in manuscript.Several of her
poems and
prose pieces, not included inany
ofthesevolumes, have beenpublishedinvariousFrench
magazines (notably in Cahiers deSud) and
three or four of herpolitical essays have appearedinthiscountry in Poli-tics.But
the only really consequential study, asidefrom
those inthe three books, is her splendid,though
absurdlyand
deliberately partial, interpretation of the Iliad,which
has been excellently translated into Englishby
Mary
Mc-Carthy and
published in pamphletform
under the title ofThe
Iliad:or,thePoem
of Force.These
arethe chief sourcesof her thought; andthe intro-ductions to the volumes editedby M. Thibon
and
Father Perrin provide, along withbrieferpersonaltributesprinted atthetimeofher death, thebasicinformationwe
have about herlife.In aprofound
sense, herlifeisherchiefwork, and
without
some
notion of her biography it is impossible toknow
her totalmeaning.On
the otherhand, herbooks
are extensionsofherlife;theyarenotliterature,not eveninthe sense that the writings of a theologically oriented authorlike Kierkegaard are literature.
They
are confessionsand
testimonies sometimes agonized cries or dazzled
exclama-tionsmotivated
by
the desire to say justhow
itwas
with her, regardless of all questions ofform
or beauty of style.They
have, however, acharm
of directness, an appealing purity of tone thatmakes
itpossible toreadthem (Simone
Weil
would
have hated toacknowledge
it!) for the sheer pleasure ofwatching
a subtlemind
capture inwords
theINTRODUCTION
most
elusive of paradoxes, or of contemplating an absolute lovestrivingto
communicate
itselfinspiteof the clumsinessoflanguage.
HER
LIFE
We
do
notknow,
as yet, a great deal about the actual facts ofSimone
Weil's life.Any
attempt at biographical reconstruction runsup
against the reticence and reserve of herparents,who
arestill living,and
evenmore
critically, itencounters her
own
desire to beanonymous
todeny
pre-ciselythose elementsinherexperience,which
tothe biogra-pheraremost
interesting. Shewas born
in 1909, into a fam-ilyapparentlysociallysecure (her fatherwas
adoctor)and
"completely agnostic."Though
her ancestors had been Jewish, the faith had quite disappeared in her immediate family,andwhere
itflourishedstillamong
remoterrelatives, ithadbecome
somethingcold,oppressive,
and
meaninglessly legalistic to a degree thatmade
Simone
Weil
all of herlife incapable of judging fairly the merits of Judaism. She ap-peared to haveno
sense of alienationfrom
the generalcommunity
connected with her Jewishness (though inappearancesheseemstohavefittedexactlyapopular
stereo-type of the Jewish face), but
grew
up
with a feeling of belongingquite firmlyto aworld
whose
valueswere
simply "French," that is to say, a combination ofGreek
and
sec-ularized Christian elements.Even
as a child, she seems to have troubled her parents, towhom
being comfortablewas
anend
of life,and
who
refused to orcould not understand her mission.They
frus-trated again and again, with the greatest ofwarmth
andWAITING
FOR
GOD
good
will, her attempts toimmolate herself for thelove ofGod.
Her
fatherand
mother
came
to represent, inanalmost archetypal struggle with her, thewhole
solid bourgeoisworld, to
whom
ahair shirtis ascandal, and sufferingonly a blight tobeeliminatedby
scienceand properfamilial care.Yet
shelovedher parentsasdearlyas they lovedher,though
shewas from
childhoodquiteincapable of overtdemonstra-tions ofaffection.
At
the age of five,she refused to eat sugar, aslong as the soldiers at the frontwere
not able to get it.The
war
hadbroughtthe sense of
human
miseryintoher protected milieu for the first time, and her typical pattern of responsewas
alreadyset: to
deny
herselfwhat
themost
unfortunatewere
unable to enjoy.
There
is in herreaction, of course, some-thing of the hopelessguilt ofone born into a favored posi-tion in asociety with sharp class distinctions.
Throughout
hercareer, there
was
tobe atouchof theabsurdinhereffort to identify herself utterly with themost
exploited groups insociety(whose
own
major
desirewas
to riseup
into the classfrom which
shewas
trying to abdicate), and being continually"rescued"from
the suffering shesoughtby
par-entsand
friends.A
littlelater inher childhood, she declared thatshewould no
longerwear
socks,while the childrenofworkers
had togo
without them. This particular gesture, shewas
laterto admitin a typically scrupulous bit ofself-analysis,
might
have beenprompted
asmuch
by
an urge to teasehermother
asby
anunselfish desire toshare thelotof the poor.At
fourteen, she passedthroughthe darkestspiritualcrisis of herlife, feeling herself pushed to the very verge ofsui-INTRODUCTION
cide
by
anacute sense ofherabsolute unworthiness,and
by
theonslaughtofmigraine headachesofan unbearable inten-sity.
The
headaches neverlefther afterward,noteveninhermoments
of extremest joy; her very experiences of DivineLove would come
toher strainedthroughthat omnipresent painwhich
attackedher, asshelikedtosay, "atthe intersec-tion ofbody
andsoul."Shecame
latertothink ofthattor-ment, intensified
by
the physical hardships towhich
she compulsively exposed herself, as a specialgift;but in early adolescence, it
was
to her only a visibleand outward
signof herinnermisery ather
own
total lack oftalent.The
root of her troublesseemsto havebeen her relation-shipwith herbrother,amathematicalprodigy, besidewhose
brilliance she felt herself stumbling and stupid.Her
lateracademic successes
and
the almost universal respect ac-corded her real intelligenceseem
never to have convinced her thatshe hadany
intellectual talent.The
chance phrase of a visitor to her mother, overheardwhen
shewas
quiteyoung,
had broughtthewhole problem
to a head.Simone
Weil
never forgot the words."One
is genius itself," thewoman
hadsaid,pointingtotheboy; andthen, indicatingSi-mone,
"the other beauty!" It is hard to saywhether
shewas
more
profoundly disturbedby
the imputation of a beauty she did not possess, orby
the implicit denial of genius.Certainly, forever afterward, she did her best to destroy
what
in herwas
"beautiful" and superficially charming, to turn herselfinto the antimask of the appealingyoung
girl.The
faceinher photographs is absolutein its refusal to be charming, anexaggeration,almosta caricatureof theWAITING
FOR GOD
lectualJewess. Inasentenceor two, FatherPerrin recreates herforusinher typicalcostume: the oversize
brown
beret, the shapeless cape, the large, floppy shoes,and
emergingfrom
thisdisguise,theclumsy, imperiousgestures.We
hear, too, theunmusical voice that completes the ensemble, mo-notonous, almost merciless in its insistence.Only
in her writing, isSimone
Weil
betrayed into charm; in her life, shemade
aprinciple of avoiding it."A
beautifulwoman,"
she writes, "looking at her image in the mirror
may
very well believe theimage is herself.An
uglywoman
knows
it isnot."But though
her very appearance declares her physical humility,we
are likely to be misled aboutSimone
Weil's attitudetoward
herown
intelligence. Father Perrin tells us that heneversaw
her yield a pointin anargument
withanybody,
buton
theother hand, he is aware, aswe
shouldbe, too, of her
immense
humbleness in the realm of ideas.Never
was
she able to believe that she truly possessed the quality shesaw
so spectacularly in herown
brother, the kind of "genius" thatwas
honestly tobe enviedin sofar as itpromised not merely "exteriorsuccess"butalso access to thevery"kingdom
oftruth."She did not
commit
suicide, but she passedbeyond
the temptation withoutabandoning
her abysmal sense of herown
stupidity. Instead, she learned painfully the uses ofstupidity.
To
lookatamathematicalproblem
one hasinex-cusablymissed, she writes, is tolearnthe true discipline of humility. In the contemplation of our crimes or our sins, evenofouressentialpronenesstoevil,therearetemptations topride, butin thecontemplationof thefailures of our
INTRODUCTION
telligence, thereisonly degradation
and
the senseofshame.To
know
thatone
ismediocreIs"tobeon
thetrueway/'
Besides,when
one
hasno
flair forgeometry
(itis inter-esting that her examplescome
alwaysfrom
the field of her brother's specialcompetence)
theworking
of aproblem
becomes
not the really irrelevant pursuit of an "answer," buta trainingin"attention,"which
isthe essenceofprayer.And
thisinturn opens to usthe sourceof ahigher kind of genius,which
has nothing todo
with natural talentand
everything to
do
with Grace."Only
a kind ofperversity canforce the friends ofGod
to deprive themselves of gen-ius,becauseitisenough
forthem
todemand
itof their Fa-ther in thename
of Christ, to have a superabundance of genius..."Yet
even thisfinal consideration neverbrought
her absolute peace.
She wrote toward
theend
of her life thatshecouldnever readthe parable of the"barrenfigtree" withoutashudder, seeinginthefigurealwaysapossible por-traitofherself,naturallyimpotent,and
yetsomehow,
inthe inscrutable plan ofGod,
cursed for thatimpotence.However
shemay
havefailedherown
absolute standards, shealways seemstohavepleasedherteachers.At
theEcoleNormale
Superieure,where
shestudiedfrom
1928to 1931, finally attainingher agregeede
philosophic at the ageof22,she
was
a student of the philosopher Alain,who
simplywould
notbelieve the reportof herearly deathyearsafter-ward.
"She
willcome
back
surely," he kept repeating. "Itisn't true!" It was, perhaps,
under
his instruction that the love ofPlato, so importantin herthought,was
confirmed inheronceand
forall.But
atthat pointof hercareershehad been
influencedby
17WAITING
FOR
GOD
Marx
as well as theGreek
philosophers;and
itwas
asan
earnestand committed
radical,though
onewho
had
never joined a particularpoliticalparty, that shetookup
herfirst teaching job atLe
Puy. Itwas
a time for radicals-those utterly bleak years at the pit of aworld-wide
depression.She
seems,inaway
notuntypicalofthe left-wing intellec-tual in a small town,to have horrified thegood
citizens ofLe Puy
by
joining theworkers
in their sports,marching
withthem
in theirpicket lines,taking part withthe unem-ployed in their pickand
shovelwork,
and refusing to eatmore
thantherationsof thoseon
relief,distributing her sur-plusfood to the needy.The
bourgeoismind
seemsto havefound
it asabsurdforthisawkward
girl tobe playingballwith
workers, astobe
half-starving herselfbecauseofprin-cipleshardto understand.
As
forcryingfor aRevolution!
A
superintendent ofinstructionwas
called into threatenSimone
Weil
with revocation of her teacher's license, atwhich
she declared proudlythat shewould
considersuch a revocation "thecrown
of her career!"There
is a note of false bravadointhe response, betrayinga desiretobecome
a"cause," toattaina spectacularmartyrdom.
Itisacommon
flawin the revolutionary activity of theyoung;
butfortu-nately for
Simone
Weil,thiskind of denouement, ofwhich
shewould
have beenashamed
later,was
deniedher.She
was
only ayoung
girl, harmless,and
her licensewas
not re-voked. Irked at the implied slur, perhaps,and
certainly dissatisfied ingeneralwith halfwayparticipationintheclass struggle ofa teacher-sympathizer, shedecided tobecome
aworker once and
forall,by
taking a jobattheRenault auto plant.INTRODUCTION
It is hard to
know how
to judge the venture.Undoubt-edly, there is in it
somethinga little ridiculous: the resolve ofthe Vassar girl of all lands to "share the experience" of the
working
class;and
theinevitable refusal behindthat re-solve to faceup
to the fact that thefreedom
to choose a worker's life,and
the consciousness of that choice,which
can never be sloughedoff,
make
thedreamed-oftotaliden-tification impossible.
And
yet for the sake of that absurdvision,
Simone
Weil
sufferedunder
conditions exacerbatedby
her sensibilityand
physical weaknessbeyond
anything theordinaryworker
had to bear; the job "enteredinto her body," and the ennui and misery ofworking-class life en-tered into her soul,making
of hera "slave," in a sense shecould only understandfullylater,
when
herreligious illumi-nation had come.She
was
always willingto take the stepbeyond
thetriv-ially silly;
and
the ridiculous pushed far enough, absurditycompounded, becomes
something else theAbsurd
asa re-ligiouscategory, themadness
of theHoly
fool besidewhich
thewisdom
of thisworld
is revealed as folly. This pointSimone Weil came
to understand quite clearly.Of
the im-plicit forms of the love ofGod,
she said, ". . . in a sensethey are absurd, they are
mad,"
and this sheknew
to betheir special claim.
Even
unhappiness, she learned, inorder to be puremust
be a littleabsurd.The
very superiority of Christoverall themartyrsisthathe is not anythingsosol-emn
asamartyr
atall,buta"slave," acriminalamong
crimi-nals, "only a littlemore
ridiculous.For
unhappiness is ridiculous."WAITING
FOR
GOD
An
attackof pleurisyfinallybroughtSimone
Weil's fac-tory experience to anend
(therewere
always her parents waiting to rescue her), but having rested fora while, justlong
enough
to regainsome
slightmeasure of strength, sheset off for Spain to support the Loyalists,
vowing
all thewhilethat she
would
notever learntouse thegun
they gave her.She
talked about Spain with thegreatestreluctance in later years, despite the fact, or perhaps because itwas
un-doubtedly forher, asfor
many
in her generation, acritical experience: the efflorescenceand
the destruction of the rev-olutionary dream.From
withinand
without the Marxisthope was
defeated in a kind ofmodel
demonstration, aparadigm
for believers.Simone Weil
was
fond of quoting theHomeric
phrase about "justice, that fugitivefrom
thecamp
of the victors" butin those yearsitwas
absentfrom
thecamp
of victor and vanquished alike.Not
even defeat could purify the revolution!While
the struggle in Spain sputteredtoward
its close,Simone Weil
endured a personal catastrophe evenmore
anticlimactic;she
was
wounded by
accident!The
fatethat preserved herthroughoutherlife for the antiheroicheroism of her actual death, broughtthis episode, too, to a bathetic conclusion.Concerned
with the possibilities ofcombining
participation and nonviolence, pondering the eternal, sheforgotthe "real"
world
ofmissteps and boiling oil, and in-eptlyburned
herself, a victim of that clumsinesswhich
seems to have been an essential aspect of her denial of the physicalself.
Badly
hurtand poorly caredfor, shewas
res-cued
from
afield hospitalby
herparents oncemore
com-ingbetween
herand her desiredagony!INTRODUCTION
The
Spanish adventurewas
herlast purelypoliticalges-ture; afterward, during the
Second
World
War,
shewas
towork up
some
utterly impractical plan for being para-chuted into France to carry spiritual solace to the fighters intheunderground
resistance;and
shewas
evento consider at one point going to the Soviet Union,where
she could doubtless not have lived infreedom
for amonth.
Among
the
Communists
in France she had beenknown
as aTrot-skyite,
and
had once beenthreatenedwithphysical violence for delivering ananti-Stalinist report ata trade union con-vention.But
atamoment when
theRussianswere
retreatingbefore the
German
attack,she felt obliged to"add
a coun-terweight/'inorderto restore that equilibriumwhich
could alonemake
life herebelow
bearable.One
can barely im-agine her in the field with theRed
Army,
this quixotic, suffering "friend ofGod,"
flankedby
the self-assured killersof "Fascist Beasts/'and
carryinginherhand
thegun
thatwould
doubtless haveblown
off her fingershad
she triedto fire it.These
later projects were, as their very "impossibility"attests, different inkind
from
her earlypractical ventures: the picketing with theunemployed,
the participation in Spain. She had passed into the realm of the politics of the absurd, ofmetapolitics,having decided that"the revolutionisthe opiate of the people/'
and
that thesocial considered in itself is "a trap of traps...an ersatz divinity... ir-remediably thedomain
of the devil."The
lure of thesocial she believed to be herspecial temptation. Against the love ofselfshewas armored
by
hervery temperament."No
one
WAITING
FOR GOD
loves himself," she
wrote
in her journal."Man
wants
to be an egoistand
cannot."But
a nostalgia forcollective actionseemed
everon
the point ofoverwhelming
her defenses.Simply
to join together with others inany group
whatso-everwould
have beenforher"delicious." "Iknow
thatifatthis
moment
Ihadbeforeme
agroup
oftwenty
young
Ger-mans
singingNazi
songs in chorus," she once said, "a part ofmy
soulwould
instantlybecome
Nazi
"Yet, the"we"
can leadaway
from
God,
sheknew,
as dangerouslyas the "I." "Itiswrong
to bean 'I,' butitisworse
to be a 'we,'"
she
warned
herself."The
city gives us the feeling of being athome.
Cultivate the feeling ofbeingathome
in exile.'*Yet
charity took her continually backinto theworld
of social action. "Miserymust
be eliminated inso far as pos-siblefrom
lifein society,formiseryisusefulonlyin respect to grace,andsocietyisnotasociety of theelect.There
willalways be
enough
misery for theelect." Ifthereis a certain inconsistencyin herposition, itis easyto forgive.Even
the"wrong"
politics of her revolutionaryyouth
shewould
not write off aswholly
mistaken; she never repented her early radicalism, understanding it as a providential discipline, throughwhich
she hadbeen
unconsciouslylearninghow
to emancipate her imaginationfrom
its embroilment with the social. "Meditationon
thesocialmechanism
isa purificationof the first importance in this regard.
To
contemplate the socialisasgood
ameans
ofpurification as retiringfrom
the world.That
iswhy
1was
notwrong
instayingwithpolitics forso long."It
was
after her Spanish experience thatSimone
Weil
INTRODUCTION
reached the critical point of conversion; but the decisive event in herspiritual education had been, she always felt, her
work
inthe factory.She
had notknown
what
shewas
seeking at the machine, but she had
found
it nonetheless:branded with the red
mark
of the slave, she hadbecome
incapable ofresisting"the religionof slaves.*7 In one sense,Simone
Weil
insisted afterward, she had not needed to beconverted;she
had
always been implicitly, in "secret" evenfrom
her lower self, a Christian; but she had never knelt, she had neverprayed, she had neverentered aChurch,she had never even posedtoherselfthe question ofGod's
exist-ence. "Imay
say that never inmy
life have I 'sought forGod/
" she saidtoward
the end of her life; but shehad
been
allthetimewaiting,withoutdaring to definewhat
she awaited.Taken
offby
her parentstoPortugal to recuperatefrom
herburns and her chagrin, she
made
herway
to Solesmes,where,listening toaGregorian chant at the
moment
when
her migraine
was
at its worst, she experienced thejoy
and
bitterness ofChrist's passion as a real event, though stillso abstractlythatshe didnotattachtoit
any
name.And
there, too, shehadmet
ayoung
English Catholic,who
introduced her to thework
of the British metaphysical poets of the seventeenth century, and so gave herakey
to the beyond, in the place of conventional prayer towhich
she had not yet beenable toturn.Like
no
saintbeforeher,Simone
Weil
distrustedthe con-ventional apparatus of pietyand
grace;and
itis typical ofherrole thatit
was
through forms ofart acceptable to the 23WAITING FOR GOD
most
skeptical anti-Christian (Gregorian chantand
meta-physical poetrytwo
of the special rediscoveries ofour
irreligious time) that she approached her encounter withGod.
"Inamoment
ofintense physical suffering," she tellsus,
"when
Iwas
forcing myself to feel love, but without desiring to give aname
to thatlove, I felt,without beinginany
way
prepared forit (forIhad
never readthe mystical writers) apresencemore
personal,more
certain,more
realthanthatofa
human
being,though
inaccessibletothe sensesand
theimagination "She
had beenrepeating toherselfa piece
by
George
Herbert,when
the presence came. "I used tothinkIwas
merelyrecitingitas a beautifulpoem,"
shewrites, "but withoutmy
knowing
it the recitationhad
the virtue ofa prayer." It is
worth
quoting thepoem
as a whole, for itsimagery
is vital, aswe
shall see later, to an understanding ofSimone
Weil'sessentialthought.Love
bade
me
welcome:
yetmy
souldrew
back,Guiltieoflust
and
sinne.But
quick-ey'd Love, observingme
grow
slackFrom
my
firstentrancein,Drew
nearer tome, sweetlyquestioning, IfIlack'dany
thing.A
guest, Ianswer'd,worthy
tobehere:Love
said,You
shall behe.Itheunkinde,ungratefull?
Ah
my
deare, Icannot lookon
thee.Love
tookmy
hand,and
smiling did reply,Who
made
theeyes butI? 24INTRODUCTION
Truth
Lord, butIhave marr'd them: letmy
shame
Go
where
itdoth deserve.And know
you
not, sayesLove,who
boretheblame?My
deare,thenI will serve.You
must
sitdown,
sayesLove,and
tastemy
meat:So
Ididsitand
eat.Even
aftersuch anexperience,thisastonishinglystubborn friendofGod
could notformore
thanfiveyearsbring her-selfconventionally topray (though shetellsus thatin 1937 she knelt for the first time, at the shrine in Assisi), finally persuadingherselftosay the PaterNosterdailywithso spe-cial a concentration that apparently at each repetition, Christ himself "descendedand
took her." Itis herremark-able
freedom
from, her actual shamefastness before thenormal
procedures of Christian worship that lend a special authority toSimone
Weil's testimony.Nothing comes
toherasaconvention ora platitude; it is asifsheis driven to reinventeverything
from
the beginning.Of
her firstmys-tical experience shewrites,
"God
had mercifullypreventedme
from
reading the mystics, so that itwould
be clear tome
that I had not fabricated an absolutely unexpected en-counter." Surely,no
mystic has ever beenso scrupulously hisown
skeptical examiner.Afterward,
Simone Weil found
in St.John
of theCrossand
the Bhagavad-Gita accounts of encounters similar to herown;
andsheeven decidedupon
rereading her oldmas-ter Plato in the light of her
new
experience that he, too,must
have achievedthe mystical union. Beforeherown
en-counter, shehad
thought that all such alleged experiencesWAITING
FOR GOD
could be only a turning of the natural orientation of the sexual desire
toward
an imaginary object labeledGoda
degradingself-indulgence, "lower thanadebauch."
To
dis-tinguishherown
secretlifefrom
suchersatzmysticismbe-came
oneof themain
objects of her thought.After herfirst mystical union, the inner existence of
Si-mone
Weil
becomes
much
more
important than anythingthatsuperficially happens to her.
Even
theWar
itself, the grossestfact of ourrecent history,shrinksin thenew
per-spective. Nonetheless,Simone Weil
continued toimmerse
herself in the misery of daily life. Drivenby
herconstant desirenotto separateherselffrom
themisfortune ofothers, she refused to leaveParis untilitwas
declared anopen
city, afterwhich
shemoved
with herparents to Marseilles.But
there shewas
Caughtby
the anti-Jewish laws oftheVichy
Government
which
made
itimpossible forher to teachany
longer; and so shewent
toGustave Thibon,
a lay theo-logian, in charge of a Catholic agricultural colony in theSouth of France.
Under
his guidance, sheworked
in the vineyards with the peasants(whom
she astonishedand
bored with lectureson
the Upanishads!), sleeping as theyslept,
and
eating theirmeager
fare until her feeble healthbroke