Cement Specifications
Full text
(2)
(3) |
(4) |. á
(5)
(6) .
(7) !"# $%&"%'# ()*+. ß
(8). |
(9) ,
(10) - .
(11) /-
(12) .
(13) | 0
(14) .|
(15) | . ,
(16) /-
(17) | |
(18) .|
(19)
(20) | .
(21) /,/. / . (*11 (231
(22) 4. 5
(23) -
(24) .
(25) / 6- |
(26) -7 -. | -
(27) 6
(28) -, |-7 -| d
(29) *81| * 9((8:* ; 91+3 * ;.
(30) !"# $%&"%'# *)*+. |
(31) - | -./-| . <. =
(32)
(33) - > - | --, | .
(34) - |,|
(35) ;|
(36) *|
(37) ;
(38) 2 - |
(39) -|
(40) - . 5 , |.
(41) - . - ?
(42) ;
(43) | 2** |, |.
(44) | 2@* | -| |.
(45) COMPOSITION OF PORTLAND CEMENT 3/26. a " ' () * + , - * + * + & * + . ' A # ## $ $$ $. 2 # . . ' A . 2 . %& "%. # . ! !$ . ! ! $ #. #. . . . . $#. #!. # . # . $. " ". . ! !$ !. # ! $. . . . #. . . #. #. ##.
(46)
(47) | -
(48) 2)*+. - B B |)B ) B -| B -
(49) B. - || 6
(50) * 9 * 7<
(51) | -./- | .< | * ) 6:* ; 9 * ; 7< :* ; ) * ; < - | .
(52) -
(53) /
(54) . / . C. | (D33< E
(55) 4
(56) 2 B ;12 * ;
(57) ; B *+3 :* ; F (+D * ;
(58) *| B 8+1 | * 9 (18 * ; 9 31G :* ; F ;1G
(59)
(60) ;| B 21G
(61) F G+1 | * F (2; * ; F +G* :* ;.
(62)
(63) | -
(64) 3)*+.
(65) ;|
(66) *|
(67) ;
(68) 2. ;; , * +. 2; . * +. 3; * +. - * +. 23 E *GE ((E (1E. 31 E **E ((E (1E. 33 E (GE ((E DE. ;1 E 2+E 3E (;E.
(69) |.| /,
(70)
(71) |
(72) |
(73) #+)*+ ë ||6* )7 ë -
(74) | |
(75) ,6E7 ë - -|. 67. ë | 6
(76) || 05 ;G*8,76)*7 ë , | 6E7 ë | .||6 ||) -7 ë / - ,6:)")"7.
(77) IS: 4031 ± 1988 INDIAN STANDARD METHODS OF PHYSICAL TESTS FOR HYDRAULIC CEMENT 7/26. PART 1. DETERMINATION OF FINENESS BY DRY SIEVING (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT APRIL 1992. PART 2 DETERMINATION OF FINENESS BY SPECIFIC SURFACE BY AIR PERMEABILITY METHOD (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT MARCH 1992 PART 3. DETERMINATION OF SOUNDNESS (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT NOVEMBER 1991. PART 4. DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY OF STANDARD CEMENT PASTE (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT AUGUST 1993. PART 5. DETERMINATION OF INITIAL AND FINAL SETTING TIMES (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT NOVEMBER 1991.
(78) IS: 4031 ± 1988 INDIAN STANDARD METHODS OF PHYSICAL TESTS FOR HYDRAULIC CEMENT 8/26 PART 6 DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT OTHER THAN MASONRY CEMENT (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT JUNE 1992 PART 7 DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF MASONRY CEMENT (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT MARCH 1992 PART 8 DETERMINATION OF TRANSVERSE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF PLASTIC MORTAR USING PRISM (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT JANUARY 1993 PART 9 DETERMINATION OF HEAT OF HYDRATION (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT AUGUST 1993 PART 10 DETERMINATION OF DRYING SHRINKAGE (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT AUGUST 1993.
(79) IS: 4031 ± 1988 INDIAN STANDARD METHODS OF PHYSICAL TESTS FOR HYDRAULIC CEMENT 9/26. PART 11. DETERMINATION OF DENSITY (FIRST REVISION). PART 12. DETERMINATION OF AIR CONTENT OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT MORTAR (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT MARCH, 1992.. PART 13. MEASUREMENT OF WATER RETENTIVITY OF MASONRY CEMENT (FIRST REVISION) FIRST REPRINT SEPTEMBER 1992. PART 14. DETERMINATION OF FALSE SET (FIRST REPRINT JANUARY 1993). PART 15. DETERMINATION OF FINENESS BY WET SIEVING (FIRST REPRINT JULY 1994).
(80) |H*;8+5(D8; | | | |
(81)
(82) (1)*+ ë 5 H
(83) -| ?| ë 5 H| - .| ë 5 H|
(84)
(85) 0 ,| ,0 | /.- ë 5 0H
(86)
(87) - | ë 5 0H| .|| ë 5 0 H|. |. | ë 5 0 H--
(88) 0 , ë 5 0 H
(89) 4 .
(90) |H*;8+5(D+;I 5 J|
(91)
(92) 0 ,| , 0 |/| /.- (()*+ |
(93)
(94) 0 ,B. 0 I|| 5 || J. |
(95)
(96) 0 ,B 0 0 5 || /| B(114I|| 5 0 J 0 . /.-| ,B )0 -. ):' 0 |EBI|
(97)
(98) 0 ,5 /.-| ,J4(11.
(99) |H*;8+5(D+;I 5 0J
(100)
(101) - | (*)*+.
(102) .| 0-.B I ' || *;+JK(11 | - (1E |0-.- C .
(103) (1E |B I(2KKJ $!'KB: I 92J BE && K5 :
(104) 0-.B I ' || *;+JK(11 | - /| 0-.I- |-|JB I | -5 (G1JK(11 | -.
(105) C.- ,|
(106)
(107) 4
(108) . |H23+5 *111 |' : & '"
(109) "'F
(110) & '""(;)*+ 7 . - ? (11 - | - .| - -
(111) | .- C. 3 - 11* - | -. I -| | | ;1*3 6 **7J /7 . - ? (11 - | - .| 4
(112) | .- C. *3 - 11* - *| 2 | -. I -| | | ;1*3 6 *;7J
(113) 7 || /-- | | - |F || /-- |- | | V
(114) *. 'V + *11 ):
(115) *. 'V+ ;111 ): |.- | * + *. ' + 211 ):
(116) - | * /á+ *. ' + *111):& '" "'
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120) 0
(121)
(122) 1
(123) 2 |.| *. 'V+*111 ):.
(124) |H21;*F (D83 |
(125)
(126) --,| | ,.-
(127)
(128) (2)*+. |;8(*H|
(129)
(130) -,| .|| - .. :A. '. ' 'L ' ' ' ' : 5L MM : ' & ' & ' & ': MM : . :A. '. ' 'L ' ' ' ' : FL MM : ' 6 AN & '
(131) & |(28D5(D + L ' 7.
(132)
(133)
(134) -C. | -,| (3)*+. |
(135)
(136) |
(137) ( | *9:* ;9 * ;E. C. G11. * | * E. ;31. ; EK. 31. 2 | ; EK. *G3. 3 :: * E KO " & '" (3 ' |21;*H(D+8 + - EK. (*1.
(138) ,|
(139) -C. | -,| . (+)*+. (. ||5 | |. *) /, ;*1*31 /- | / - , . *. -
(140) 0 ,F)*. ;.
(141) || 0| *8,| -|| 81 )* E. | .
(142) | -
(143)
(144) ./| , | EK 1(31(1. 2 3. 21;1. | .|| 6.
(145) -07 E K 1818 4 | .
(146) CHARACTERISTICS 33-. GRADE OF CEMENT 4353PPC-I FLY ASH. CHEMICAL REQUIREMENTS. 1. CAO/ OXIDES RATIO. NOT MORE THAN 1.02 AND NOT LESS THAN 0.66. NOT MORE THAN 1.02 AND NOT LESS THAN 0.66. NOT MORE THAN 1.02 AND NOT LESS THAN 0.80. FLY ASH (OF FINENESS MIN. 320 M2 / G AND LIME REACTI ITY ALUE NOT LESS THAN 4.0 MPA; UNIFORMLY LENDED OR INTERGROUN D ITH OPC IS 269: 1989; HOMOGENEI TY OF MIX + 3 %) MIN. 15 % AND MAX. 35 % Y EIGHT OF OPC. PPC-II CALCINED CLAY 17/26. CALCINED CLAY POZZOLANA (OF FINENESS MIN. 320 M2 / G AND LIME REACTI ITY ALUE NOT LESS THAN 4.0 MPA; UNIFORMLY LENDED OR INTERGROUND ITH OPC - IS 269: 1989; HOMOGENEITY OF MIX + 3 %) MIN. 15 % AND MAX. 35 % Y EIGHT OF OPC.
(147) CHARACTERISTICS 33-. GRADE OF CEMENT 4353PPC-I FLY ASH. PPC-II CALCINED CLAY. CHEMICAL REQUIREMENTS: 2. ALUMINA/IRON OXIDE NOT LESS THAN. 18/26. RATIO 0.66. 0.66. 0.66. -. X. 3.INSOL. RESIDUE, NOT MORE THAN. 4.0. 3.0. 3.0. 4. MgO NOT MORE THAN. 6.0. 6.0. 6.0. 4.0(100-X) 100 WHERE X IS OF FLY ASH IN PPC 6.0. -. X. 4.0(100X) 100 WHERE X IS OF CAL. CLAY PO . IN PPC 6.0.
(148) CHARACTERISTICS 33-. GRADE OF CEMENT 4353PPC-I FLY ASH. PPC-II CALCINED CLAY. CHEMICAL REQUIREMENTS: 5. TOTAL SULPHUR AS SO3. 6. TOTAL LOSS ON IGNITION, NOT MORE THAN. 19/26 FOR C3A 5 OR LESS :|
(149) FOR C3A MORE THAN 5 :| 3 . SO3 NOT MORE THAN 3.0. 5.0. 5.0. 5.0. 4.0. 5.0.
(150) CHARACTERISTICS 33-. GRADE OF CEMENT 4353PPC-I FLY ASH. PPC-II CALCINED CLAY. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS: FINENESS NOT LESS THAN, m2 / kg. 20/26. 225. SOUNDNESS EXPANSION NOT MORE THAN, mm 10 LE- CHATELIER¶S :AUTOCLAVE: 0.8 u u u| :AERATION (KEEP 75 MM DEPTH OF LAYER AT 50 TO 80 RH, FOR 7 DAYS). RE-TEST FOR SOUNDNESS. RE-TEST ± NOT MORE THAN LE- CHATELIER¶S :- mm 5 AUTOCLAVE: 0.6. 225. 225. 300. 300. 10. 10. 10. 10. 0.8. 0.8. 0.8. 0.8. 5 0.6. 5 0.6. 5 0.6. 5 0.6.
(151) CHARACTERISTICS 33-. GRADE OF CEMENT 4353PPC-I FLY ASH. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS: SETTING TIME INITIAL, NOT LESS THAN, min. FINAL, NOT MORE THAN, min. FOR FALSE SET: REMIX AND BREAK THE FALSE SET, RE-TEST.. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 600. 600. 600. 600. 600. 23 MPA 33 MPA 43 MPA. 27 MPA 37 MPA 53 MPA. 16 MPA 22 MPA 33 MPA. 16 MPA 22 MPA 33 MPA. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PROGRESSIVE INCREASE IN STRENGTH, NOT LESS THAN 72 1 HR. 16 MPA 168 2 HR. 22 MPA 672 4 HR. 33 MPA TRANSVERSE STRENGTH. PPC-II CALCINED CLAY 21/26. MUTUALLY AGREED BETWEEN PURCHASER & SUPPLIER.. (IS 4031 PT.8:1988) DRYING SHRINKAGE NOT MORE THAN. -. -. -. 0.15. 0.15.
(152) |3(+5(D3D | | | | |
(153)
(154) H
(155) || 0| **)*+ | - ë á3 // ' 4 V 4
(156) ë. á'5 6 VV
(157)
(158) V
(159)
(160) . ë. /3 3á7. 8 6 V 0 V 0 . ë. /5á7. 8 V 0 9 0
(161) :. ë. ' . . ë. /. /'. ë. /3 . V 00 0
(162) 4
(163) 2
(164) 4 1 V 0
(165) 4 1 V 0 1
(166) 1
(167) :
(168) 2 : 2
(169) /
(170) 1 : 2 0
(171) : 0 1
(172) .
(173) |3(+5(D3D | | | | |
(174)
(175) H
(176) || 0| *;)*+
(177) |
(178) ë :4 44
(179) © 1: 0 : ; 1 44
(180) : )' : : /
(181) 1 1 %7 2
(182) V
(183) 4 :
(184) : 4
(185) ë // .. 6 0
(186)
(187) 4:44
(188) ë <3 á'/3 ''/ '' 6 0 4 % ë '' '
(189) V2
(190) V ë C. 0-
(191) ./| / /|
(192)
(193) 4 1:
(194) V
(195) 000 4 V0 = V 0 = 4 0 4 0
(196) 4: 1
(197) V % =0%0
(198) 4
(199) :
(200)
(201) : ë .'6
(202) 1
(203) 0 1 1 4 0
(204)
(205)
(206)
(207)
(208)
(209) 10
(210) 1 1 4 0
(211)
(212) : 1 2 : 1: 4 0
(213) 0
(214)
(215) 1: 4 0
(216)
(217) 09 00 04
(218) :
(219) 44
(220) 11 1 1
(221)
(222) 4 1 1 .
(223) |3(+5(D3D | | | | |
(224)
(225) H -4.-| *2)*+ | - /
(226) 1
(227) 4 4
(228)
(229) 2 :
(230) 0 9
(231)
(232) 0
(233) 00 0
(234)
(235) 0:
(236)
(237)
(238) 1 0 ë á3 //'. V 4
(239)
(240) 9
(241) : = 0
(242) . ë á'5. VV
(243)
(244) V
(245)
(246) . ë 3á7 8 . V 9 V 9 0 0 V 9 V 9 0 0. ë ' . . : 00 = 00
(247) 1 1 0
(248) /
(249) /
(250) : 0 2.
(251) |3(+5(D3D | | | | |
(252)
(253) H -4.-| *3)*+
(254) -
(255) .- &BI K:J)I K*J 1>?d
(256) 2
(257)
(258) 11
(259) :
(260) 44 0
(261) :
(262)
(263) 1
(264) 1 4 0
(265)
(266) 0 :
(267) >? h 1 V 0 4 0
(268) h 1 V0 4 0
(269) &BI; KJ)I K* J. : . :
(270) >? © !"h # 1 V 0 4 0
(271) © 1 V0 4 0
(272) O d0 2 :
(273) 0 1: 4 0
(274) d0 4:
(275) 0 1: 4 0
(276) : d
(277) :
(278) 0 1: 4
(279)
(280) 2: :: 0 44 d09 00
(281) 44 : 4 0
(282) . P |
(283) $ # % ß & % ß & |.- ||--/ |
(284) .
(285) |3(+5(D3D | | | | |
(286)
(287) H .-.| -|
(288) ,*+)*+ | ? |
(289) . /
(290) 1V 0
(291) 0
(292) : 1 )' |
(293) 0 1
(294) *8 |
(295) 4 | |'2 9
(296) 0 1
(297) :
(298) :
(299) V0
(300)
(301) 0 :
(302) :1:
(303) : 1: 4 0
(304) 4 10
(305)
(306)
(307) 19V6
(308) .'
(309) ''! &; "
(310) B();
(311) |
(312) % =09
(313) 0
(314) 44 4 9 44 Q (21)R") *
(315) 93+ % =0
(316)
(317) : 1 0
(318)
(319) :
(320) '%:: '%" (3)R " 2:
(321) 9
(322) 0
(323)
(324) á
(325) 44 4 :
(326) ':
(327) : : 0 4
(328)
(329)
(330) ': 2
(331) :
(332) 0
(333) 4
(334) 1 : :
(335) 4 :
(336) 0 :
(337) 11
(338) :
(339) 4
(340)
(341) -
(342) .- ': 6
(343) * :
(344) +1 : 2 9
(345) 0
(346) 1 : 2 4 ': 4 : >? 94
(347) % =0
(348) V % =0.
(349)
Related documents
Pembuktian bahwa, untuk aliran bubbly dan slug, fraksi hampa dekat dengan garis homogen, sedangkan untuk aliran churn, annular, dan slug-annular yang jauh di bawah garis homogen..
This Release Document (prepared by AEMO) is placed under change control (see section 4) and managed by the CF to ensure all aspects that impact the final implementation are
His only option Wade thought was to pay off the debts using some of the cash advance checks two of his credit card companies sent him every month even though he knew that the last
I want to show how the agent’s equilibrium effort decision is altered, if the princi- pal holds private information about the expected outcome of projects and the principal’s wage
(2007) found that farmers markets play an important role in building local food networks. These studies concentrated on two elements of the local food networks: farmers markets
Many counties have introduced an application for the Healthy Kids program in addition to the joint Children’s Medi-Cal/Healthy Families application, private health plan for
Three steps were taken for the correlation analysis to answer the research questions and test the hypotheses: (1) Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to discover
These specifications are not specially marked and represent values with no or negligible deviations from the given value (e.g. dimensions or resolution of a setting