NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

(Emphasis in original).. as "Health Maintenance Services Organization Services." AISLIC denied coverage and this action ensued. We first address whether AISLIC had a duty

(6) The inventory of damaged and undamaged personal property described in Condition number 4.b., Your Duties After Loss. Despite Citizens' argument that the insured failed to

restrictions. But Hilliker and the Fiores maintain a material factual dispute as to the intent of Spivey and the Sonns with regard to future unilateral amendments to the

The trial court found sections 11.066(3) and (4) unconstitutional as applied because the provisions (1) unconstitutionally restrict the Lee Homeowners' rights to payment of

settlement—an unqualified "right to recover the entirety of the costs it paid on the Medicaid recipient's behalf," violated the third-party liability provisions of the federal

judgment, and they argued lack of standing in a memorandum filed in opposition to Freddie Mac's motion for summary judgment. Thus, the standing issue was argued to and

(Emphasis added.) Thus, section 440.39(3)(a) permits a workers' compensation carrier to assert a lien with respect to benefits it has paid on behalf of an injured employee.

After receiving BCI's recommendations, Roker hired Florida Testing and Environmental, Inc. FTE agreed that Roker's home sustained sinkhole damage but disagreed with the scope of