arXiv:1506.01247v1 [gr-qc] 3 Jun 2015
1Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, India
2Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, 14-b Metrologicheskaya St., Kiev 03680, Ukraine
3Department of Physics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kiev, 64/13 Vladimirskaya St., Kiev 01601, Ukraine
4Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, Universitetsky Prospekt, 13, Moscow 119992, Russia
5Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya 18, Kazan 420008, Russia It is generally believed that a cosmological arrow of time must be associated with entropy production. Indeed, in his seminal work on cyclic cosmology, Tolman in- troduced a viscous fluid in order to make successive expansion/contraction cycles larger than previous ones, thereby generating an arrow of time. However, as we demonstrate in this letter, the production of entropy is not the only means by which a cosmological arrow of time may emerge. Remarkably, systems which are dissipa- tionless may nevertheless demonstrate a preferred direction of time provided they possess attractors. An example is provided by a homogeneous scalar-field driven cyclic cosmology where the presence of cosmological hysteresis causes an arrow of time to emerge in a system which is formally dissipationless.
I. INTRODUCTION
It is a common and widespread belief that an arrow of time is invariably associated with some form of dissipation and entropy production which usually characterize irreversible phe- nomena. While it is true that dissipative phenomena do give rise to a preferred orientation of time, we demonstrate in this letter that entropy production is not essential for the existence of time’s arrow, and that such an arrow can appear even if the equations describing cosmic evolution are dissipationless and therefore formally time reversible. Examples to support our argument arise from scalar field driven cosmology which has relevance both for inflation and a cyclic universe.
II. ARROW OF TIME IN CYCLIC COSMOLOGY
Cyclic cosmology with dissipationless matter is usually not thought to possess an arrow of time. Indeed, if the Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) universe is spatially closed, then the Einstein equation
H2 = κρ − k
a2 , κ = 8πG
3 , (1)
leads to the following cyclic solution for pressureless matter
a(η) = A(1 − cos η) , t = A(η − sin η) . (2) where η =R dt/a(t).
Solution (2), depicted in figure 1, has an initial singularity at a = 0, which is periodically repeated. This singularity is absent in several modified-gravity theories. For instance, in a class of braneworld models [1, 2] and also in loop quantum cosmology (LQC) [3–7] one gets1
H2 = κρ
1 − ρ
ρc
− k
a2 , κ = 8πG
3 , (3)
which ensures that the universe ‘bounces’ when ρ ≃ ρc. At late times, when ρ ≪ ρc, Eq. (3) reduces to (1). The value of ρc is related to the fundamental parameters appearing in Braneworld cosmology/LQC. We do not write them explicitly since the precise form of ρc
will not be required in this paper.
1 Braneworld and LQC corrections are not the only means of making the universe bounce. A comprehensive review of bouncing cosmologies is provided in [8].
FIG. 1. The expansion factor of a spatially closed matter dominated universe is described by the self-similar cycloid shown above.
In an attempt to describe a cyclic universe with progressively larger cycles, Tolman [9]
assumed the presence of a viscous fluid with pressure
p = p0− 3ζH , (4)
where p0 is the equilibrium pressure, H = ˙a/a, and ζ is the coefficient of bulk viscosity.
From Eq. (4) one finds that p < p0 during expansion (H > 0), whereas p > p0 during contraction (H < 0). This asymmetry during the expanding and contracting phases results in the growth of both energy and entropy. The increase in entropy makes the amplitude of successive expansion cycles larger, leading to a progressively larger and older universe [9].
Although Tolman linked the asymmetry in pressure during expansion and collapse to dissipation via (4), such an asymmetry arises even for non-dissipative systems such as a massive scalar field in an FRW space-time.
The energy density and pressure of a homogeneous scalar field are, respectively, ρ = 1
2φ˙2+ V (φ) , p = 1
2φ˙2− V (φ) , (5)
and the scalar field equation of motion is
φ + 3H ˙φ +¨ dV
dφ = 0 . (6)
The term 3H ˙φ in (6) behaves like friction and damps the motion of the scalar field when the universe expands (H > 0). By contrast, in a contracting (H < 0) universe, 3H ˙φ behaves like anti-friction and accelerates the motion of the scalar field. Consequently, a scalar field with the potential V = m2φ2 displays two attractor regimes [10–13]
p ≃ −ρ during expansion (H > 0) ,
p ≃ ρ during contraction (H < 0) , (7)
which are displayed in figure 2. In cyclic cosmology these two regimes combine together to produce cosmological hysteresis [14, 15], which is shown in figure 3.
Expanding Universe Contracting Universe
φ φ
φ .
φ .
FIG. 2. The attractor during expansion is ˙φ2 ≪ V ⇒ p ≃ −ρ, whereas during contraction the attractor is ˙φ2≫ V ⇒ p ≃ ρ; from [13] (figure Copyright 2002 by the American Physical Society).
In a cyclic universe these two attractor regimes give rise to cosmological hysteresis which is shown in figure 3.
Cosmological hysteresis is a remarkable feature2 which the scalar field shares with a viscous fluid by virtue of the parallel between (7) and (4). The system of equations (3), (5), (6) was numerically solved in [14, 15], and the results are summarized in figure 4. One finds that the presence of hysteresis leads to time asymmetry in cyclic cosmology, which is reflected in the increase in amplitude of successive expansion cycles. This increase is related to the amount of hysteresis in a given cycle, namely H pdV . If cosmic contraction
2 Although this letter focuses on the m2φ2 potential, the phenomenon of hysteresis is quite general and exists for other potentials as well, as demonstrated in [14, 15].
+ 1
- 1
a w = p/
ρ
expansion collapse
COSMOLOGICAL HYSTERESIS
FIG. 3. The hysteresis loop has H pdV < 0 evaluated over a single expansion-contraction cycle in a scalar field dominated universe [15] (figure Copyright 2012 by the American Physical Society).
is sourced by the k/a2 term in (3), then the increase in successive expansion maxima is given by δamax = −κH pdV , where H pdV < 0. However, the presence of a small negative cosmological constant, Λ < 0, can also make the universe turn around and contract, giving rise to cyclicity. In this case, the presence of hysteresis leads to δa3max = Λκ H pdV .
Time-reversal of the equations of motion
We have seen that a cyclic universe can possess an arrow of time even though the equations governing it are time symmetric and non-dissipative. One may wonder about the cause of this effective time irreversibility. The reason lies in the fact that stable trajectories (attractors) during expansion become unstable as the flow of time is reversed and the universe becomes contracting, and vice versa (see figure 2). This can be studied by time-reversing the {φ, ˙φ, H}
trajectory numerically. Since the system of equations (5), (6), (3) is time-reversible, one expects the universe to simply retrace its original forward-time trajectory. Surprisingly, this does not happen in real numerical simulation. The reason behind this behaviour is, of course, computer errors that accumulate during numerical integration and make the system quickly deviate from the time-reversed trajectory, which has become highly unstable. The computed
FIG. 4. The presence of hysteresis, shown in figure 3, increases the amplitude of successive ex- pansion maxima and endows a cyclic universe with an arrow of time. In the upper panel, cosmic turnaround is caused by the presence of a negative cosmological constant, whereas, in the lower panel, turnaround is due to a (positive) curvature term [15]. In both panels the cyclic universe is sourced by a homogeneous scalar field with the potential V (φ) = 12m2φ2.
time-reversed trajectory will depend on the precision of the computing facility. Therefore, in order to show this effect in a controlled fashion, we add some artificial noise during the time-reversal by adding tiny terms to the time-reversed values of the time derivatives of the scale factor and the scalar field. (Naturally these terms are several orders of magnitude smaller than their real values.) Shown in figure 5 is an example of what usually occurs if one reverses the ‘forward-time’ trajectory by setting ˙φ → − ˙φ+n1, H → −H +n2 at an arbitrary time, where n1 and n2 are small noise terms. During the first half-cycle of the time-reversed evolution, the universe does retrace its steps. But after that, the time-reversed trajectory rapidly departs from its forward-time evolution, and, instead of decreasing, expansion cycles
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
time
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
scale factor
FIG. 5. The expansion factor of a cyclic universe filled with a massive scalar field. The trajectory of a(t), φ(t) is reversed at t ≃ 130 (vertical blue line), via ˙φ → − ˙φ, H → −H. Since the equations of motion are time-reversible, one might expect the forward-time trajectory at t < 130 to be a mirror image of the time-reversed trajectory at t > 130. Surprisingly, this is not the case: scale factors to the right and left of the vertical blue line are not mirror images of each other. Indeed, while the two trajectories (forward time and time-reversed) are similar during 120 . t . 175, the time-reversed trajectory begins to depart from its forward-time counterpart at t > 175. This arises because the scalar field dominated universe is unstable to small perturbations. The presence of such perturbations, in the form of round-off errors, leads to pronounced departures between the forward-time trajectory (t < 130) and its time-reversed development (t > 130).
(once more) begin to increase.
We note here that the effective time irreversibility that we have encountered here acts on sufficiently large timescale, involving several expansion-contraction cycles of the universe.3
3 While increasing expansion cycles are routinely encountered for flat potentials, steep potentials give rise
III. INFLATION
As noted above, the effective time irreversibility of our system is connected with the fact that stable trajectories (attractors) during expansion become unstable as time is reversed and the universe begins to contract. Another example of a dissipationless system which is unstable to time-reversal is provided by inflation. The equation of motion of the inflaton field during inflation
φ + 3H ˙φ +¨ dV
dφ = 0 , (8)
is very similar to the motion of a body falling under gravity in a viscous medium characterized by a viscosity coefficient η:
m¨z + η ˙z − mg = 0 . (9)
In both cases, an attractor is soon reached. In the case of (9), this attractor is the terminal velocity v ≡ ˙z = mg/η. It is reached by means of the transfer of translational energy of the body to the large number of translational and rotational degrees of freedom present in (molecules of) the viscous medium. This transfer results in an entropy increase, which converts the free-fall of the body into an irreversible process.
Similarly, a scalar field rolling down a potential with a gentle slope soon reaches the slow-roll limit: | ˙φ| ≃ |V′/3H|, | ¨φ| ≪ |3H ˙φ|. In this case, the role of viscosity is played by the expansion of the universe, so that η ≡ 3H. An important difference from (9) is that, since equation (8) is not associated with microscopic entropy production, one might naively expect the scalar field to precisely follow its time-reversed trajectory after time reversal.
Surprisingly, this is not the case. After time reversal, the Hubble parameter changes sign, which makes the second term in (8), which originally acted like friction, to behave like anti- friction, rendering the time-reversed slow-roll trajectory unstable to small perturbations.
Since small perturbations, in the form of quantum fluctuations, are always present in the inflationary scenario, one comes to the conclusion that, practically speaking, an inflationary trajectory is difficult to reverse, as illustrated in figure 6 ! In the case of inflation, a larger perturbation causes an earlier departure from the inflationary equation of state w = −1.
Moreover, we can see that the perturbation in the left panel of Fig. 6 (we have perturbed the time derivative of the scale factor by 10−4of its value) leads to the asymptotic behaviour
to two-fold cyclic pattern in time with smaller expansion cycles being nested in larger ones, much like the phenomenon of ‘beats’ in acoustics [15].
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
time
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
scalar field
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
time
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
w
0 2 4 6 8time10 12 14 16 18
0 1 2 3 4 5
scalar field
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
time
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
w
FIG. 6. Scalar-field values (left) and the associated equation of state w = p/ρ (right) for a universe undergoing inflation via the potential V = m2φ2/2. (Units are in terms of the Planck scale.) The trajectory of a(t), φ(t) is reversed at t ≃ 10 via ˙φ → − ˙φ, H → −H (vertical blue line) with simultaneously perturbing H by 10−4 (upper panel) and 10−6 (lower panel) of its value. Since the equations of motion are time-reversible, one might expect the time-reversed trajectory at t > 10 to be a mirror image of the forward-time trajectory at t < 10. Surprisingly, this is not the case. For a while after time reversal (10 ≤ t ≤ 14), φ(t) does follow its forward time evolution ‘backward in time’, with w decreasing as expected. But for t > 14 the time-reversed trajectory becomes highly unstable causing w to increase towards +1 instead of declining to −1.
φ → +∞, while perturbation by 10−6 of its value induces the φ → −∞ regime. In a more realistic scenario of inhomogeneous perturbations, a rapid deviation from the inflationary regime would be accompanied by a rapid growth of the scalar-field inhomogeneity. This issue, however, lies beyond the scope of the present paper.
The departure from the inflationary regime during contraction leads to a larger value of the scale factor as the Planck density is reached. Consequently, in the presence of a hypothetical Planck-scale bounce, the next cycle will commence from a larger value of the scale factor than the previous one (since the energy density varies rather slowly close to the de Sitter regime but grows much more rapidly: as a−6, during the asymptotic w ≃ 1 stage of expansion which is shown in the right panel of Fig. 6).
This might have important consequences.
It is well known that the homogeneous and isotropic FRW universe, in which matter satisfies the ‘energy conditions’, comprises a set of measure zero in the space of all homo- geneous but anisotropic solutions of the Einstein equations [16]. Taken at face value, this might suggest that the universe unravelled from a very special set of initial conditions. How- ever, the inflationary paradigm throws a fresh perspective on this issue since, an anisotropic universe containing a positive cosmological constant rapidly isotropises, approaching the de Sitter space attractor if the spatial curvature is not too large [17]. This remains true for inflationary space-times in which a scalar field replaces Λ [18, 19]. In this case, the de Sitter space attractor solution is a transient, and lasts while the slow roll conditions are satisfied.
Consider, for instance, the Bianchi I model ds2 = dt2−
3
X
i=1
a2i(t)(dxi)2, (10)
for which the Einstein equation becomes H2 = 8πG
3 ρ +1
2φ˙2+ V (φ) + ρanis , (11) φ + 3H ˙¨ φ + dV
dφ = 0 , (12)
where H describes the mean expansion rate H = 1
3
3
X
i=1
˙ai
ai
= ˙a
a , a = (a1a2a3)1/3 , (13) and the anisotropy is encoded in the anisotropy density ρanis:
ρanis = 1 6
3
X
i=1
˙ai
ai
− H
2
= Σ
a6 . (14)
From (11) we see that a large initial anisotropy, ρanis, increases the expansion rate, H, thereby introducing greater damping into the scalar field equation of motion (12). The
of anisotropy than in its absence [20]. The observation that inhomogeneities and anisotropies get rapidly diluted in an inflationary universe has occasionally been referred to as the ‘cosmic no-hair theorem’ in analogy with no-hair theorems for black holes proven during the 1970’s.
However the fact that the equations governing inflationary expansion are reversible has sometimes been used to undermine the no-hair theorem by means of the following argument.
Let us consider a hypothetical universe, far more anisotropic than ours, in which the present anisotropy parameter is ρfinalanis. Then, since the equations of motion (11), (12) are reversible, one can evolve them back in time in order to determine the initial anisotropy, ρinitialanis , which would have led to ρfinalanis after inflation. In this manner, it is always “possible to choose initial data in such a way that the universe would be more anisotropic than ours is today” [18].
The loophole in this argument is the assumption that, since the classical equations of motion are strictly time reversible, the evolution of the universe does not possess any arrow of time.
Earlier in this section we demonstrated that this was not the case: an arrow of time arises even during classical evolution, and small fluctuations could prevent inflation from being time reversible. This observation considerably weakens the above argument and strengthens the no-hair theorem. (We propose to study this issue in greater detail in a companion work.)
DISCUSSION
In the present paper, we have demonstrated the effective irreversibility of the formally
‘time-reversible’ cosmological system consisting of a spatially closed universe filled with a homogeneous scalar field. This situation is not uncommon, and takes place in statistical physics with many degrees of freedom, where, for example, the (classical) molecular dy- namics is evidently reversible, but small deviations from the exact time-reversed velocities (which would lead to an evolution with decreasing entropy) rapidly lead to the usual entropy increase. We should mention that the existence of an arrow of time has also been pointed out in connection with the dissipationless gravitational clustering of an N-body system [21, 22].
Our case is special, however, since we are dealing with a dynamical system with only one and a half degrees of freedom — described by the scale factor and the scalar field with one constraint.
Two important conditions need to be satisfied in order that irreversibility operate in such
a universe. Firstly, the scalar-field potential should be not very steep: it is known that the inflationary regime is absent in theories with exponentially steep potentials (and, if the universe is cyclic, then subsequent cycles do not increase in this case [15]). Secondly, to have cycles, we need the occurrence of bounces (transitions from contraction to expansion) as well as turnarounds (transitions from expansion to contraction). The latter is not a problem for conventional cosmology with positive spatial curvature or for certain models of dark energy [15]; the former is, however, a problem and usually requires some modification of general relativity at sufficiently large densities.4
If the above two conditions are met, then the FRW cosmology of a scalar field exhibits an effective arrow of time, with preferred evolution towards larger scale factors from cycle to cycle. Phenomenologically, the dissipationless universe with a scalar field behaves as if it contained a fluid with bulk viscosity, with the asymmetry in pressure during expansion and contraction giving rise to the phenomenon of cosmological hysteresis. This might have interesting consequences for inflationary cosmology and cosmic no hair theorems.5
It should be noted that we do not consider spatial inhomogeneities in the present paper.
Introducing such inhomogeneities would mean increasing the number of degrees of freedom and creating new types of instability. The fact that inhomogeneities are growing during cosmological evolution creates the usual arrow of time for gravitating systems — a self- gravitating system evolves from a homogeneous to a highly nonhomogeneous distribution (in contrast to a molecular gas, which evolves towards a homogeneous configuration). The well-known proposal by Penrose to use the Weyl tensor as a measure of gravitational entropy is based on this property (see for instance [25] for the current state of this proposal).
Our study demonstrates the existence of cosmological situations where the effective arrow of time is not associated with the Weyl tensor. This is so because this tensor identically vanishes for the FRW metric which we consider. This leads to the conclusion that not all effectively time-irreversible phenomena in self-gravitating systems can be reduced to measures based on the Weyl tensor (and, more generally, that there exist time-irreversible phenomena which are not associated with the growth of spatial inhomogeneities).
4 It is well known that a bounce can be produced within GR in a model with positive spatial curvature, although this requires fine-tuning of initial conditions for the scalar field [23]. However, this bounce takes place when the equation of state parameter is close to w = −1 in both the contracting stage and the follow-on expanding stage. Since no hysteresis is present in this case, such a bounce cannot cause the effects studied in the present paper
5 Within a multiverse setting, the presence of hysteresis allows the universe to experience many different vacua during successive cosmological cycles [24].
VS and YuS acknowledge support from the India–Ukraine Bilateral Scientific Coopera- tion programme. The work of AT is supported by RFBR grant 14-02-00894, and partially supported by the Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University.
[1] Yu. Shtanov and V. Sahni, Phys. Lett. B 557 (2003) 1–6.
[2] H. Maeda, V. Sahni and Yu. Shtanov, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 104028 [Erratum–Phys. Rev.
D 80 (2009) 089902].
[3] A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 124038.
[4] G. Calcagni, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 023511.
[5] E. J. Copeland, J. E. Lidsey and S. Mizuno, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 043503.
[6] P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 063508.
[7] T. Stachowiak and M. Szyd lowski, Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 209–214.
[8] M. Novello and S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, Phys. Rep. 463 (2008) 127–213.
[9] R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1934), 524 p.
[10] V. A. Belinsky, L. P. Grishchuk, I. M. Khalatnikov and Ya. B. Zeldovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 63 (1985) 195–203.
[11] V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov, L. P. Grishchuk and Ya. B. Zeldovich, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 232–236.
[12] V. A. Belinsky, H. Ishihara, I. M. Khalatnikov and H. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79 (1988) 676–684.
[13] G. N. Felder, A. V. Frolov, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 023507.
[14] N. Kanekar, V. Sahni and Yu. Shtanov, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 083520.
[15] V. Sahni and A. Toporensky, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 123542.
[16] C. B. Collins and S. W. Hawking, Appl. Phys. 180 (1973) 317–334.
[17] F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 273 (1963) 1–11; G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751; S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss, Phys.
Lett. B 110 (1982) 35–38; A. A. Starobinsky, Pis’ma Astron. Zh. 9 (1983) 579–584 [Sov.
Astron. Lett. 10 (1984) 302–304]; R. W. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2118–2120.
[18] I. Moss and V. Sahni, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 159–162.
[19] T. Rothman and G. F. R. Ellis, Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 19–24; L. G. Jensen and J. Stein- Schabes, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 931–933; M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. Lett.
57 (1986) 2237–2240.
[20] R. Maartens, V. Sahni and T. D. Saini, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 063509.
[21] J. Barbour, T. Koslowski and F. Mercati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 181101.
[22] J. Barbour, T. Koslowski and F. Mercati, A gravitational origin of the arrows of time, arXiv:1310.5167 [gr-qc].
[23] A. A. Starobinsky, Pis’ma Astron. Zh. 4 (1978) 155–159 [Sov. Astron. Lett. 4 (1978) 82–84].
[24] Y-S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 101302(R).
[25] T. Clifton, G. F. R. Ellis and R. Tavakol, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 125009.