AGENDA ITEM: 5 AGENDA DATE: 6/11/2020
Additional Back-up For
4-19026
Harbor View
-
C)fY)
Ii
= ...
. .
LOT9
\
\
\
\LOT 7
TANT ALLON NORTH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Plat Book
WWW
89 @- -- ---
Plat No. 48- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - I ; ·
\
--- - -
LOT6
LOTS
THE PROPERTY OF
THOMAS P. GAFFNEY,
Trustee of the William R. Cary Irrevocable Trust
UBER 13876 @ FOLIO 164
4.6625 AC.
t:: --
J.P. FD.
LOT 5
-- ---
Plat Book
WWW
87 @ Plat No. 46- - -I
- -
--,--
I
I LOT4
---- --- ---
---
LOT9
\
I\
- ' L - -
- - - -
432.20' - -
---1
40.0'1,- - ~'c!._~ .., ,
LOTJO
---
I
1 I.P. SET
I.P. FD. I w/Cap/ w/Cap~ - - - - 1 ' _/
26.73'
I
1- I 15.00
C
6
25.20'
I I
I
II I
:~ I
1~
Ii to I
;g
I: °' I
I
II I
'----i-
1 5. 00Cc::
<
l) e
~ ~
~
,._
Cc::
S?
---._
-&
- ~
C) (°')
"---
1 - S 88"71 '1 0" W- ~- \ 457.40' -
J.P. FD. J.P. SET
---0-
w/Cap w/CaI
I I I
-- ----
I
I LOT l
LOT 3
--- -- -- --- ----
---- --- ---- ---
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATES :
I hereby certify that I have carefully surveyed the property as shown by this plat and iron pipe are in ~ ce_;:;, sh/ _ /
DATE:
05/16/2011 ~_£. ~ ~ _ , . / t ' .
40.0'
---~~ - ~ i
BOUNDARY SURVEY
THE PROPERTY OF
THOMAS P. GAFFNEY,
Trustee of the William R. Cary Irrevocable Trust
UBER 13876 @ FOLIO 164
5TH
ELECTION DISTRICT PRINCE GEORGE'S CO., MD.
DATE:05/16/2011 SCALE : 1"= 30' SHEET l OF 1
REVISIONS
W. L. MEEKINS, INC.
373.08 ft
373.08 ft
373.08
329.55 ft
329.55 ft 253.84 ft 253.84 ft
329.55
253.12
Feet
Feet
(Per Survey)
Feet
Subject Property
Baron Court Syria Court
Comparison of Width of Parcel 5 to Adjacent Properties Exhibit
¯
Data provided by Prince George's County Planning Department 1
Rear Yards Oriented to Streets Exhibit 1 - Harborview (4-19026)
¯
Rear Yards Oriented to Streets Exhibit 2 - Proximity to Site
¯
Data provided by Prince George's County Planning Department 1
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
Ü
77°0'37.20"W
38°44'2.25"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes.Zone X
Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs
Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary
Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
Legend
OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES
OTHER FEATURES
MAP PANELS
8 B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location.
1111111
0-- -
- 513-
L]
□ .
121 Autumnwood Lane
Fort Washington Road Site
Approxmiate
Harbor View_Subdivision
Lourdes Drive
Hickory Drive
IHHAAC, INC.
(Indian Head Highway Area Action Council, Inc.)
A Federation of South County Citizens & Civic/Neighborhood Associations P. O. Box 44013, Fort Washington, Maryland 20749
Web Site: www.IHHAAC.org Email: [email protected]
June 10, 2020
Elizabeth Hewlett Chairwoman
Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission Re: 4-19026 – Harbor View
Preliminary Plan of Subdivision
Seven lots is excessive. Would the applicant reduce the proposal to 5 lots? The development would be less concentrated. And, that might make it possible to save another of the specimen trees.
The traffic analysis was done on June 6, 2019. The trip generation assumptions shown in the chart are based on guidelines established some time ago. How can we assume in the current culture there will be no more than 5 AM peak-hour trips and 6 PM peak-hour trips as shown in Recommendation 5? We can’t. Most single- family residences are built with 2-car garages. Will these homes also have 2- vehicle garages? That’s 10/14 vehicles in an area where there are 2 working individuals. Then if you consider children with vehicles and the potential for rental properties, there is no way Recommendation 5 can be regulated or enforced.
Recommendation 2 pertains to the mitigation fee for Public Safety. We expect it will be paid no matter when the grading permit is issued. We also request the applicant agree to pay the fee, regardless of the outcome of CB-020-2020. Will the applicant proffer to pay the fee and not request waiver?
Assigning the responsibility to the owners of Lot 7 to maintain the landscape buffer and the fence per Recommendation 7 and 9c invites neighborhood confrontation.
There is so much missed/overlooked at the time of a closing, will the owners of Lot 7 even realize they are responsible? Is there no other way to address this issue?
Because of these concerns, we cannot support this project as submitted.
Sarah Cavitt
Sarah Cavitt President
cc: Mr. Robert J. Antonetti, Jr., Esq.
Mr. John Ferrante
Sievers, Thomas
From: Shivasti Singh <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 1:50 PM
To: Sievers, Thomas
Subject: RE: 4-19026 Harbor View Project
Hello Thomas,
I'm Shivasti Singh and I live directly across from the Harbor View Project what would be the entrance and exit point. I would be negatively impacted by this development that's why i'm against it i'm a Real Estate Agent in the DMV my value would go down. The cars coming out of that developments lights will be shining directly into my house which is not good for my house. It will also bring my value down because i'm already on a extremely busy street on Fort Washington Road cars are non stop going by and to have that going on and added lights in my bedroom, living room is to much. The added traffic is not good for a neighborhood and street that is super busy which will cause even more traffic. You have 22 houses going up within a mile radius already and everyone is going to be coming from 210 and the added homes will cause even more traffic on my already busy street. I do not want traffic just to get out of my driveway which will happen with these
houses. Everyone already says i'm on a busy street when they come to visit and try to turn into my house, I do not want light's on top of it flashing into my house and more traffic. I'm apposed to this development going up and I would like the land to be conserved for wildlife.
Thank you, :)
Shivasti Singh Realtor Licensed VA * MD * DC
To help protect you r priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Cell: (301)325-0026
Office: (703) 378-8810 Fax: (703) 896-5009 Visit my website! www.shivasti.ismyreagent.com
For All of Your Real Estate Needs Give SHIVASTI SINGH a Ring!!!
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
https://www.facebook.com/pg/shivastirealtor/
HEADQUARTERS CHANTILLY – 14526 Lee Rd. Suite 100, Chantilly, VA 20151
ALEXANDRIA/KINGSTOWNE – 6408 Grovedale Drive, #204, Alexandria, VA 22315 BETHESDA – 6701 Democracy Blvd. Suite 150 Bethesda, MD 20817
2