Antisense-mediated reduction in
thrombospondin reverses the malignant
phenotype of a human squamous carcinoma.
V Castle, … , E V Prochownik, V Dixit
J Clin Invest.
1991;
87(6)
:1883-1888.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115212
.
Thrombospondin (TSP) is a trimeric glycoprotein which is synthesized and incorporated into
the extracellular matrix by a wide variety of cells. TSP is involved in a number of cellular
processes which govern tumor cell behavior including mitogenesis, attachment, migration,
and differentiation. To directly assess the role of TSP in tumor cell growth and spread, a
human squamous carcinoma cell line, with high TSP production and an invasive
phenotype, was transfected with a TSP cDNA antisense expression vector. Five unique
transfected clones were obtained with reduced TSP production. Expression of the
transfected antisense sequence in these clones was verified by a ribonuclease protection
assay. These clones demonstrated reduced growth rates in vitro when compared with a
vector transfected control. After subcutaneous inoculation into athymic mice, the antisense
clones formed either no tumors or tumors that were slow growing and highly differentiated.
This contrasted with the vector-transfected clone which produced poorly differentiated,
rapidly growing, invasive tumors. Our results argue in favor of a direct role for TSP in
determining the malignant phenotype of certain human tumors.
Research Article
Antisense-mediated Reduction in
Thrombospondin
Reverses
the
Malignant Phenotype
of
a
Human
Squamous
Carcinoma
Valerie Castle,* James
Varani,*
SusanFligiel,"1
Edward V.Prochownik,* VishvaDixit"
Departmentsof*Pediatrics, tPathology, and the
*Committee
onCellularand MolecularBiology, University ofMichigan,AnnArbor, Michigan 48109;and the
IlDepartment
ofPathology, Veterans Administration MedicalCenter,WayneState University, Allen Park, Michigan 48109
Abstract
Thrombospondin
(TSP)
is atrimeric glycoprotein which issyn-thesized
andincorporated
into
the extracellularmatrix
by awidevariety of cells.
TSP
is
involved in a number of cellular processeswhich
govern tumor cellbehavior
including
mitogen-esis,
attachment,migration,
anddifferentiation.
Todirectly
as-sess therole of TSP in tumor cell growth and spread, a human squamous
carcinoma
cellline,
withhigh TSP production
and aninvasive
phenotype, was transfected with a TSP cDNAanti-sense
expression
vector.Five unique transfected
clones wereobtained with
reducedTSP production.
Expression of thetransfected antisense
sequence inthese
clones wasverified
by aribonuclease
protection assay. These clonesdemonstrated
re-duced growth rates in
vitro
when comparedwith
a vectortrans-fected
control.After subcutaneous inoculation into
athymicmice,
theantisense
clonesformed
either no tumors or tumorsthat were slow
growing
andhighly
differentiated.
This con-trastedwith
thevector-transfected
clone which producedpoorly
differentiated,
rapidly growing, invasive
tumors.Our
re-sults argue in
favor of
adirect
rolefor
TSP
in determining themalignant
phenotype of certain human tumors. (J. Clin. Invest.1991.
87:1883-1888.)
Keywords:thrombospondin
- extracel-lularmatrix * antisense RNA * tumor invasionIntroduction
The extracellular
matrix
(ECM)'
provides
asemisolid
supportupon
which cells attach and adhere.
Thrombospondin (TSP),
ahomotrimeric
protein
ofM,
420kD,
issynthesized by
awidevariety
of
normaland
transformed cells and
incorporated
into
the ECM (1-4).
Functionally,
TSP actsas agrowth supportivematrix
component.TSP
has beenshown
tofacilitate cell
at-tachment
and serveasanadhesion factor for
manycell
types(5-9). Several
converging
lines
of evidence
point
to arole
for
TSP
in controlling cellular
proliferation. First, TSP
mRNAis
induced as an
immediate early
response togrowth
factor
stimu-Address correspondence to Dr. Vishva M. Dixit, The University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Pathology, 1301 Catherine
St.,Box0602,AnnArbor,MI48109.
Receivedfor publication 13 August 1990 and in revisedformI Feb-ruary 1991.
1. Abbreviations used in thispaper:1 IB,UM-SCC-IlBsquamous
carci-nomacells; ECM, extracellular matrix; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of me-talloproteinase; TSP, thrombospondin.
lation
(10). Second, exogenous TSP potentiates the mitogenic
response
ofepidermal
growth factor(EGF)
onsmooth musclecells
(SMC),
andthis
effect is inhibited by
agentswhich
preventthe
incorporation
of TSP into the matrix(1 1). Third,
TSP isfound in
areasof cellular
proliferation in developing
mouseembryos (12). Fourth,
TSP ismade
insignificant
quantities by
proliferating undifferentiated
humanepidermal keratinocytes
(13),
anditsproduction
falls in cells induced todifferentiate by
a
variety
of meansincluding
exposure tohigh external
Ca2"
concentrations,
exposure tointerferon-y
ordepletion
ofgrowth supplements
from the culture medium(7, 14).
Inrecent
studies
wehave
found
aninverse
correlation
be-tween TSP
production
anddegree
ofin vitrodifferentiation
among
several
squamouscarcinoma cell lines (6). Because
thedegree of
epithelial
tumorcell differentiation is also inversely
correlated with
malignant behavior,
weinvestigated
thepossi-bility that the malignant phenotype of
squamous carcinomacells could be altered by stably lowering TSP levels using
anti-senseRNA.The
antisense
RNAtechnique
leads
to areduction
in the
expression of
a target gene atthe
protein level through
the formation of
aspecific double-stranded
RNAhybrid which
interferes with normal
mRNA transportand translation (15).
This technique
has been usedsuccessfully
toreduce
c-fos
ex-pression and inhibit 3T3
cellproliferation (16),
todetermine
the role
of the
c-myc protooncogenein
cellcycle progression
and
differentiation (17, 18), and
morerecently,
toinvestigate
the role
of
thec-raf- 1
protooncogeneproduct in conferring
radiation sensitivity
to aline of human
squamouscarcinoma
cells
(19).
Inthe
presentstudy
wehave
constitutively
expressed
TSP
antisense transcripts in
ahuman
squamouscarcinoma cell
line which
normallyproduces
high levels
of TSP and forms
aggressive
tumorsin nude
mice. The antisense clones
wereana-lyzed for
integration
and
expression
of
transfected
sequences,TSP
production, and in vitro and in vivo
growthcharacteris-tics. Clones with
areduction in TSP
grew at aslower
ratein
vitro
andwere lesstumorigenic
in athymic mice, whencom-pared with parental
or vectorcontrol
lines.
Methods
Vector constructs. The TSP antisense expression plasmid was
con-structed by isolating the 4.5 kb XhoIfragmentcontainingthe entire TSP cDNAfrom the F2 plasmid (20) and ligating it into the XhoIsite ofthe MC CMVexpressionvector(Fig.1,giftof M.Clarke,University ofMichigan). This construction placed the cDNA downstream from andunder thetranscriptionalcontrolof thecytomegalovirus immedi-ateearly response promoter andHTLV-1translational enhancer (21). Theantisense orientation of this new constructionwasconfirmed by restriction endonuclease digestion. The MC CMV expressionvector contains thegene-encodingneomycinresistance which enables selec-tion for the presence of this plasmidin mammalian cellsusingthe antibiotic G418(Geneticin; SigmaChemical Co., St.Louis, MO).
J.Clin. Invest.
© The American
Society
for ClinicalInvestigation,Inc.0021-9738/91/06/1883/06 $2.00
Bgl 11
Figure 1.Schematic representation of the MC CMV expression plas-mid (gift of M. Clarke, University of Michigan) containing the entire TSP cDNA in a 4.5-kb Xho I fragment. This construction places the TSP cDNA in an antisense orientation downstream of the cytomega-lovirus immediate early response promoter and the HTLV-I transla-tional enhancer (21). Downstream of the TSP sequence, SV40 splic-ing andpolyadenylation signals are found for message processing. The genecodingforneomycinresistance is also contained in this vector.
Beforeelectroporation the antisense expression plasmid was linear-izedat auniqueSal I sitewithin the vector backbone.
Cell culture.The human squamous carcinoma cell line UM-SCC-1lB (11B)previously described(5, 6) with high TSP production was usedfor theseexperiments.Thecells were grown in DME supple-mented with nonessential amino acids, 2 mM glutamine, 15% FBS, 100U/mlpenicillin, and 100 ,g/mlstreptomycin.Cells were main-tainedat37°Cwith 5%CO2and subculturedbytrypsinization.
Transfections.2X 10711Bcells derived as a subcloneofthe paren-tallinewerewashed andsuspendedin 0.5 ml PBS(138mMNaCl,2.7 mMKC1, 8.1 mMNa2HPO4, 1.5 mMKH2PO4). 10
Mg
of linearized antisenseexpression plasmid orvector-only DNAwasaddedto the cellswhich were then electroporated usingaGene Pulser(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., RichmondCA)set at 1.1 kV and 25MF.Afterelec-troporationthe cellsweresuspended in 20mlof supplemented DME. 48 hafterelectroporationthe cells were subcultured at a 1:10 dilution, and then 24hlaterselectionwasbegun in G418 at 400
Mg/ml
(Genet-icin; Sigma Chemical Co.). G418 resistant clones were individuallytransferred usingfilter paper soaked intrypsinand subcultured sepa-rately in six-well dishes.
Quantitative immunoprecipitations. Individualtransfected clones weregrown to 80%confluency in10-cmdishes and labeled for 6 h with 2 mlcysteineandmethionine-freeMEMsupplemented with 1% BSA and 100
MCi/ml
of35S
methionine-cysteine (trans label; ICN Radio-chemicals, Irvine, CA).Themediumwascollectedandanequal num-berofTCAprecipitablecounts wereincubated with rabbitpolyclonalanti-TSPantibody overnightat4°Cin the presence of protease
inhibi-tors(1
MLg/ml
leupeptin, 1 ,g/mlaprotinin, 10 ,ug/ml soybeantrypsininhibitor, 1 ug/ml pepstatin, and buffercontaining 15mMNaCI,10 mMNaH2PO4, 1%TritonX-100,0.5%deoxycholic acid,0.1%SDS,
20 mM EDTA. Thespecificityof the anti-TSPantibodyhas been de-scribedpreviously (12). Antigen-antibody complexeswereprecipitated
with protein A-Sepharose beads. The pellets were washed and boiled in asample buffer containing 8Murea, 50 mM Tris HC1, and 1% SDS, and the elutedproteins resolved on a 7.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel underreducing conditions. After electrophoresis, gels were fixed in methanol and acetic acid, treated with Entensify (New England Nu-clear, Boston,MA), dried, and exposed to Kodak XAR film at -80'C. TSP production was quantitated using the Betascope 603 Blot Ana-lyzer (Betagen, Waltham, MA).
Southern analysis. 12 ugof DNA from each clone and the vector transfected control line were cut to completion using Bgl II under con-ditions suggested by the manufacturer(Boehringer-Mannheim Bio-chemicals, Mannheim, Germany). Digested DNA was precipitated with linear acrylamide, 0.1 vol 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, and 2 vol of 95%ethanol, electrophoresed on a 0.6% TBE gel, and transferred to a Nytranfilter(Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH). The filter was hybrid-ized with a PCR generated 32P-labeled fragment of the TSP cDNA at
420C. Thefilterwaswashed three timesatroom temperature in 2x
SCC,0.1%SDS,andonceat650C in 2XSSC,0.2% SDS.After blotting dry, the filter was exposed to Kodak XAR film at -80'C withan intensifying screen.
Ribonucleaseprotection assay. Antisense transcript expression was verified using the SP6 riboprobe protocol as previously described (22). A328 bp Bam Hl-Ava1fragmentfrom the TSP cDNA was cloned in the senseorientation into the SP64vector(PromegaBiotec, Madison,
WI)(Fig. 2b).Theresultant plasmid was linearizedat aunique BglI site.A1.8-kbsensetranscriptwassynthesized usingSP6 RNA
Polymer-ase(BethesdaResearchLaboratories, Gaithersburg, MD)and32P-GTP (400 MCi/mmol;AmershamCorp.,Arlington Heights, IL).This
tran-scriptwasallowedtohybridizewithequalamounts(10
Mg)
of RNA from each antisense clone and the vector control lineat51°Cfor 16 h in 10gl
of 80%formamaide,0.4 MNaCl,40 mMPipes,pH6.4,and 1 mM EDTA (23). Single-stranded overhangswere removedusinga
180
kD-I
b
k,
6p
1
/ / /
1 80 kD- _
/ / / /
9\O 0\0 O\O O)\O
Figure 2. Quantitative immunoprecipitationof the media from the antisense clones and the vector-transfected control with rabbit
poly-clonal TSPantibody (12).Cellsweremetabolicallylabeled with
"S
methionineand
"S
cysteine,themediafractionwascollected andanequivalentnumberofcountsimmunoprecipitated. (a)The antisense clones showedamarked decrease in the
production
of TSP whencomparedwith thevectortransfected control No. 5:-antisense clone Nos. 5 and7, 54 and 49%, and No. 12,80%.(b)Threeunique vec-tor-transfected controlsproduceapproximately equivalentamounts of TSP with<5% variation betweenuniqueclones.Asnoted,TSP
RNaseA(40 mg/ml) and RNase TI (2 ug/ml; Sigma Chemical Co.). Theentire sample was resolved on a 6% polyacrylamide gel. After elec-trophoresis the gelwas dried and exposed to Kodak XAR film at -80'Cwithanintensifyingscreen.
In vitro and in vivo growth characteristics. In vitro growth rates were determined by plating cellsat7.5X 104 cells/dish in 35-mm culture dishes.Triplicatedishesof each clone were harvested and counted 1-5 dafter plating.Invivo growth was assessed by injecting Swiss athymic mice with 1.0 X 10'cells in the hind limb. Animals were examined everyother day for signs of tumor growth and tumor size was assessed with a caliper. Animals were sacrificed at 6 wk or when tumors reached ageometric mean diameter of 15-20mmandsections were taken of the tumor mass and surrounding tissue. After hemotoxylin and eosin staining, sectionswereexamined blindly for degree of invasiveness and differentiation.
Results
After transfection of the 11 B squamous carcinoma cell line 12 G4 18
resistant
clones were obtained. To ascertain the unique-nessof
these clones, we examined the integration site of the transfected plasmid with Southern analysis of genomic DNA cutwith
Bgl II, which has only asingle
site in the transfected constructs. Thus, the size of the hybridizing fragment is depen-dent onthe distance between the site of random integration ofthe
transfected
DNA and the nearest Bgl II recognitionse-quence in the
flanking
genomic DNA. A Southern blotcon-taining the
BglII-digested
DNA was probed with a32P-labeled
fragment of the TSP cDNA. This fragment contains a portion
of the
cDNAwhich is 3'
tothe Bgl IIrecognition
site found inthe
transfected
sequence. The groupof
12 transfectantscon-tained
threeuniquely transfected
clones. As shownin Fig.
3 a,the three
clones
uniquely integrated
the TSP antisenseexpres-sion
plasmid: antisense
clone No. 5 has aunique
2.75-kbband,antisense clone
No. 7 has a 9.0-kb band, and antisense cloneNo. 12 hasan 8.5-kb band. Besides these
unique
bands, a13.5-and a 3.2-kb b13.5-and from the endogenous TSP genearedetected in each clone and the vector transfected control. The faint 8.0-kbband detected in antisense No.7is the result ofincomplete digestion.
We next examined each uniqueclone for theexpressionof
antisense TSP transcripts. An
SP6-generated
uniformly labeled RNA senseprobewasused for this purpose. AsseeninFig. 3b, antisense transcripts were identifiedin allthree clones but wereabsent in the vector-transfected controlline.
Immunoprecipitation with a TSP polyclonal antibodywas
performed
to determine TSPproduction
inthetransfectedclones
(12).
The media fraction fromcultures of the antisenseclones
and oneunique
vectorcontrolline wereimmunopre-cipitated using equivalent
numbers ofTCA-precipitable
counts. Thesupernatants from the initial precipitationswere
reimmunoprecipitated
to ensure quantitative removal of allTSP. Compared with each
vectorcontrol and thenontrans-fected parental lines,
each of the antisense clonesproduced
lessTSP. The
level
of TSPproduced by
antisense cloneNo. 7 was49% ofthe amount
produced
bythe vector control No. 5.Anti-sense clone No. 5
produced
54% and antisense clone No. 1280%
relative tothe vector control No. 5(Fig.
2a).
To assess thedegree
towhichTSPproduction
isaffectedbyclonalvariation,weanalyzed the amount
of TSP production
in threeunique
vector
control transfected lines by metabolic
labeling
and
sub-sequent
immunoprecipitation.
The result of thisanalysis
indi-cates there is minimalvariability (<
5%by
scanningdensitome-try) in TSP
production
amongthe
transfected clones
(Fig.
2b).
In
vitro
growth characteristics
arepresented
inFig.
4. Allantisense clones showed
reducedgrowth
rateswhencompared
with the
vector-transfected
control. To determine
tumorige-nicity,
weinoculated athymic mice with antisense
clones.Tostrengthen
anyinterpretation resulting
from in vivodata,
wegenerated
threeadditional antisense lines
in ordertohave asufficient number
of
independent
clonesassayed
fortumorige-*a-
345
bp
fragment
.;,:
---...
A
-.267
bp
Bg
P Probe
Figure 3. (a) Southern blot showing unique
in-tegrationof TSP antisense cDNA. 12
Aig
of ge-nomicDNAfrom each clonewasdigestedwith Bgl II and resolvedon a0.6% agarosegel and transferredonto nylon. The blotwasprobedwitha32P-labeled
fragment
of the TSP cDNA. All threeantisense clones haveauniqueband inadditiontotheendogenous TSP 13.5- and 3.2-kb bands: antisense clone No. 5,a2.75-kbband;antisense clone No. 7,a9.0-kbband; antisense clone No. 12,an8.5-kb band.(b)
Antisensetranscript expressionwas demon-stratedusingtheSP6Riboprobe protocol(21). Asshownin theschematic, aBamHI-AvaI fragment of the TSP cDNAwascloned in the
senseorientation into the SP64vector
(Pro-megaBiotec).A 1.8-kbsenseprobewas syn-thesized andhybridizedto 10 ug of RNA from the antisense clones andvectorcontrolline.
Single-strandedoverhangswereremovedusing
RNaseAand RNaseT1.Asis seen, all three antisense clones haveanantisense
transcript
which was absent in thevector-transfected control. Theprotected TSP fragment is 328nt butmigratesat345 ntduetoadventitious homology between flanking
regions
in the SP64vectorand TSP cDNA.a
23.1
-I9.4
-6.5
-4.3
-b
/
/
/...
458
bp
I*434
bp
2.3
-2.0
- Bg BL_.:
A345 nt
I
b
A
N4
200000
Vectoronly
LU
z
-J
ui
..1
100000
-0+
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
DAYS
Figure 4.Invitro growth curves were generated by plating cells at 7.5 x 104cells/dish in 35-mm culture dishes. Triplicate cultures were harvested forcounting 1-5 d after plating. Standard deviations are
indicated.Antisense clone Nos. 5 (*), 7 (o), and 12 (-) grew slower than thevector-transfectedcontrolline
(n).
nicity.
Characteristics
of allclones
aresummarized
inTable
I.Similar molecular and
biochemical
analyses
on theadditional
clones were carried out to
verify
uniqueness
andproduction
of antisensetranscript
(data notshown). Clones
14 and 10 had a95% reduction in TSP, whereas clone
8 had a 60%reduction.
The
vector-transfected control line produced tumors
infive
outoffive animals after a
latency
of 1-2wk.
This
wassimilar
to the parental line which produced tumors infive
outof
five animals
in 1-2 wk.
Mice injected with antisense clone Nos.
7, 8, 10, and 14failedtoproduce
tumorsthrough
theduration of thestudy
(45 d). Two
outof five animals
injected
with antisense clone
No. 5
failed
toproduce tumors,
twoanimals produced tumors
only after a 3-wk
latency, while
oneanimal injected with
this cloneproduced
a tumorafter 10d.
Itis noted that
noneof
theTableL Tumorigenic
Phenotype
ofAntisense
ClonesTSP AS Tumor
CloneNo. production transcript formation Latency
% wk
lIB
parental 100 - 5/5 1-2 Vector control 100 - 5/5 1-2ASNo. 5 54 + 3/5 3
AS No.7 49 + 0/5 *
AS No.8 40 + 0/6 *
AS No. 10 5 + 0/6 *
AS No. 12 80 + 3/5 2-3
AsNo. 14 5 + 0/6 *
*>45d.Tumorigenic phenotypeof 1 B
parental,
vectorcontrol,
andantisense clones. Antisense clone Nos.7,8, 10,and14failedtoform tumorsafteralatencyof 45 d. Antisense clone Nos. 5 and 12formed tumorsin threeoutoffive animals withalonger latencythan the parentalor vectorcontrol.
a
30
0 0 20 0o 40 o
AS#e
Wam
WWMME
£8.10
m mmMM mmm m
AS012
A8914
days
Figure5. In vivogrowthof antisense clones and the vector-transfected controlwasassessed
by
injectingSwissathymicmice with 1.0xI07
cells in the hind limb. Animalswereexamined every otherdayfor
signsoftumorgrowthand the sizewasassessedbyacaliper. The vector-transfected controlsdevelopedtumorsin fiveoutoffive
ani-mals within 1 wk of inoculation. No tumorsdevelopedin antisense clone Nos.7, 8, 10,or14,whereas three animalsdevelopedtumors in antisense clones 5 and 12 aftera
longer latency.
tumorsin thisgroup
reached
asize equivalenttoeventhesmall-est tumors ofthe vector control group.
Two
out of the fiveanimals injected
withantisense clone
No. 12failed
toproduce
tumors,
whereas three animals injected
with this clonepro-duced
tumorswith alatency
greaterthan
the vectorcontrolanimals. (Fig.
5)
Grossly
thetumorsfrom
thevectorcontrolswerehemor-rhagic
without
aclear tumor/normal tissue border (Fig.
6a).
Histologically, they
werepoorly
differentiated with manymi-totic
figures
anddirect
extension into thesurrounding tissue
(Fig.
6b).
Thiswasindirect
contrast tothe tumors arisingfrom
the
antisense clones
whichgrossly
werewelldemarcated from
normal
tissue, lacked
ahemorrhagic
appearance(Fig.
6 c), andhistologically
were moredifferentiated, showing
development
of
keratin whorls
andpseudoencapsulation
(Fig. 6d).
1o
0.
0
0 0 20 30 40 so
30O
20
10
20.
to1
50-~
A--CP-ol
_zro_
Figure 6.(a-d)Grossdissection oftumorsfromavector-transfected control (a) and antisense clone No. 12(c).Thevector tumors werelarger,
hemorrhagic, and lackedacleartumor/normal tissueboundary.Incontrast,tumorsfrom theantisense clonesweresmaller,nonhemorrhagic,
and hadacleartumorborder separate from normalsurroundingmuscle.Light microscopicviewsoftumortissuerevealinganundifferentiated
phenotype withhighmitotic number in thevector-transfectedcontrols(b)andadifferentiatedphenotypein theantisense clone No. 12
(d)
as evidenced by theproduction of keratin whorls, lowmitoticnumber, andpseudoencapsulation.Discussion
Previous studies have establishedarelationship between TSP
production and proliferation insquamousepithelial cells.
His-tochemically, TSP is localized at sites of rapid proliferation (12). Insquamousepithelium, thisincludes the basal cell layer
and hair follicles (14). In vitro,
undifferentiated,
rapidly-pro-liferating epidermal keratinocytes synthesize largeamountsof TSP and incorporate it into the ECM. When the cellsarein-duced to differentiate, TSP production is reduced concomi-tantly with inhibition of proliferation (7, 14). In addition, stim-ulation of proliferation in quiescent keratinocytes by addition ofepidermal growth factor (EGF)orsomatomedin C is
asso-ciated witha rapid induction ofTSP synthesis (1 1). Among squamous carcinoma celllines, there is a direct relationship
between proliferation and TSP production (5). Although these dataclearly shown that TSP production is associated with
pro-liferation insquamousepithelialcells,causeandeffect hasnot
been determined.
Toaddress this critical issue,wehave,in thepresentstudy, utilized antisense-mediated inhibition of TSP synthesis. This approach isapowerful tool formodulating synthesis ofspecific
proteins and has been used in thepast toinvestigate the role of
oncogenessuchasc-fos,c-myc,andc-raf- inthe controlofcell
proliferation/differentiation (17-19, 24). More recently, it has
been used
tomodulate the
production
of tissue inhibitor
ofmetalloproteinase
(TIMP) tostudyits
rolein
tumormetastasis
(25).
Our present work extendsthis approach
tostudying
astructural
componentofthe ECM.
Inthisstudy
we were abletomarkedly reduce TSP
production in
squamouscarcinoma cells
and
assessthe
effect ofthis alteration
onthe in vitro and in
vivo growth.Five unique antisense
transfected
clones wereobtained
with
reducedproduction
of
TSP. The degree towhich
clonalvariation affects
TSPproduction
inindividual
celllines
wasdetermined by assessing TSP levels in
threeunique
vectorcon-trol
lines. Clonal variation
inTSP
production
was <5% andcould
not accountfor the dramatic reduction observed
in eachantisense clone. The in vitro growth
rates wereassessed
forthree
of
theantisense
clones and were shown tocorrelate
withthe level
of production of TSP in
theseclones.
Invitro growth
analysis
wasnotperformed
onantisense clones 8,
10, and
14 asa consequence
of
theselines
being lost
tocontamination
intissue culture.
In nudemice clones 7, 8, 10, and
14 failedtoproduce tumors
through
theduration of
thestudy. Antisense
clone
No. 12produced
tumorsin three
outof
five animals.
These tumors
differed from the
vectorcontrols by
having
botha
longer
latency and slower growth
rate.Antisense
clone No. 5had
aproduction of TSP
greater thanantisense clone
Nos.7,
8,
10, and 14 but less than
antisense
No. 12.This clone's in vitro
interme-diate. Three of the five mice inoculated formed tumors, the
latency was longer than antisense clone
No.12
andthe tumors
failed
toreachthe
geometric
meandiameter of the
vectorcon-trols.
Tumors
from the vector control animals were grossly
hem-orrhagic, had increased mitotic activity and
apoorly
differen-tiated phenotype.
Incontrast, tumors
from antisense clone
Nos. 12 and 5 showed a highly differentiated phenotype as
evidenced
by
pseudoencapsulation, low mitotic activity, and
keratin
whorls.These data
arethe
first to demonstrate that production of a
structural component
of the ECM can be modulated by
anti-sense
inhibition of
protein synthesis.
Inaddition,
they
provide
evidence that
doing
soalters in
vitro and in vivo cell growth
behavior.
This suggests that TSP plays
afunctional
role in
con-trol
of cellular proliferation.
Asimilar growth supportive role
for TSP has been suggested in mesenchymal cells as discussed
earlier (1 1). Thus TSP may
serve tomodulate
growth
of
cells
of
both mesodermal and ectodermal
origin.
The
mechanism by
which
this occurs
is unknown, although it has been shown that
endogenously-synthesized
TSP
serves as a potentadhesion
fac-tor
for
both normal and
malignant
squamous
epithelial
cells
(5-9). By
altering the synthesis of this
protein,
wemay have
interfered with the
capacity
of the cells
tocorrectly interact
with
their matrix and altered their ability to receive and process
growth
controlling
signals.
Whereasthis
is
speculation
atpres-ent, this
study
provides
insight
into the
importance
of TSP in
tumorigenesis
andemphasizes
how any
comprehensive theory
of
cancerbiology
mustaddress
theunique
natureof the ECM
and
its components.
Acknowledaments
This work was supported by grants from the AmericanCancerSociety (CD-61211) to V. M.Dixitand J.Varani. V. M.Dixitand E. V. Pro-chownikareEstablished Investigators oftheAmericanHeart Associa-tion. V. P.Castle isa CentennialFellowwiththeMedical Research Council of Canada.
References
1.McPherson, J., H. Sage, and P. Bornstein. 1981. Isolation and characteriza-tion of a glycoprotein secreted by aortic endothelial cells in culture: apparent identitywith platelet thrombospondin. J.Biol. Chem.256:1130-1136.
2.Raugi, G. J., S. M. Mumby, D. Abbott-Brown, and P. Bornstein. 1982. Thrombospondin: synthesis and secretion by cells in culture. J. Cell Biol. 95:351-354.
3.Jaffe, E. A., J. T. Ruggiero,L. L. K.Leung, P. I.McKeown-Longo, and D. F. Mosher. 1983. Cultured human fibroblasts synthesize and secrete thrombo-spondin andincorporateit into extracellular matrix. Proc.Nail. Acad.Sci.USA. 80:998-1002.
4. Sage, H., F. M. Farin, G. E. Striker, and A. B. Fisher. 1983. Granular pneumocytes in primary culture secrete several major components of the extra-cellular matrix. Biochemistry. 22:2148-2155.
5.Varani, J., V. M. Dixit, S. E. G. Fligiel, P. E. McKeever, and T. E. Carey. 1986. Thrombospondin-induced attachment and spreading of humansquamous
carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 167:376-390.
6.Varani, J., T. E. Carey, S. E. G.Fligiel,P. E.McKeever, and V. M. Dixit. 1987. Tumortype-specific differences in cell-substrate adhesion among human tumor celllines.Int. J. Cancer. 39:397-403.
7. Varani, J., B. J.Nickoloff, B. L. Riser, R. S. Mitra, K. O'Rourke, and V. M. Dixit. 1988. Thrombospondin-induced adhesion of humankeratinocytes.J.
Clin.Invest.81:1537-1544.
8. Roberts, D. D., J. A. Sherwood, and V. Ginsburg. 1987. Platelet thrombo-spondin mediates attachment and spreading of human melanoma cells. J. Cell
Biol.104:131-139.
9.Tuszynski, G. P., V. Rothman, A. Murphy, K. Seigler, L. Smith, S. Smith,
J.Karczewski,andKI A. Knudsen. 1987. Thrombospondin promotes cell-sub-strateadhesion. Science (Wash. DC). 236:1579-158 1.
10.Majack, R. A., J. Mildbrandt, and V. M. Dixit. 1987. Induction ofthrom-bospondin messenger RNA levels occurs as an immediateprimaryresponse to plateletderived growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 262:8821-8825.
11.Majack, R. A., L. V. Goodman, and V. M.Dixit. 1988. Cellsurface thrombospondin is functionally essential for vascular smooth muscle cell prolifer-ation. J. Cell Biol. 106:415-422.
12.O'Shea, K S., and V. M. Dixit. 1988. Unique distribution ofthe extracel-lular matrix component thrombospondin in the developing mouse embryo. J. Cell Biol.'I07:2737-2748.
13.Nickoloff, B. J., R. S. Mitra, B. L.Riser,.V.M.Dixit, andJ. Varani. 1988. Modulation of keratinocyte motility: correlation withproductionofextracellular matrixmolecules inresponsetogrowthpromotingandanti-proliferative factors.
Am. J.Pathol.,132:127-135.
14.Nickoloff, B. J., B. L. Riser, R. S.Mitra,V. M.Dixit,and J.Varani. 1988. Inhibitoryeffect of gamma interferon on cultured humankeratinocyte thrombo-spondinproduction,distributionandbiologicalactivities. J. Invest. Dermatol. 91:213-218.
15.Kim, S. K., and B. J. Wold.1985. Stablereductionofthymidinekinase activityin cellsexpressinghighlevelsofantisenseRNA.Cell. 42:129-138.
16.Holt, J. T., T. V. Gopal, A. D. Moulton, and A. W. Nienhuis. 1986. Inducibleproductionofc-fos antisense RNA inhibits 3T3 cellproliferation.Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA. 83:4794-4798.
17.Heikkila, R., L. K. G. Schwab,K.L. E.Wickstrom,S.L.Lake,D.Pluznik,
R.Watt, and L. M. Neckers. 1987.Ac-mycantisenseoligodeoxynucleotide in-hibits entryinto S phase butnotprogress fromGotoG,.Nature(Lond.).
328:445-449.
18.Prochownik, E. V., J. Kukowska, and C. Rogers. 1988. c-myc antisense transcripts accelerate differentiation and inhibit G1 progressionin murine
er-ythroleukemiacells.Mol.Cell.Biol.8:3683-3695.
19.Kasid, V., A.Pfeifer, T. Brennan, M.Beckett,R. R.Weischselbaum,A. Dritschilo,andG. E. Mark.1989. Effect ofantisensec-raf-lontumorgenicityand radiation sensitivity of a human squamous carcinoma. Science(Wash. DC).
243:1354-1356.
20.Dixit, V. M., S. W. Hennessy,G.A.Grant, P.Rotwein,and W. Frazier. 1986.Characterization of acDNAencodingtheheparinandcollagenbinding
domainsof humanThrombospondin.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. USA.83:5449-5453. 21.Takebe, Y., M.Seiki,J.Fugisawa,P.Hoy,K.Yokota,K.Arai,M. Yo-shida, and N. Arai. 1988. SR Promoter anefficient and versatile mammalian cDNAexpression system composedoftheSimianVirus40earlypromoter and theR-U5 segmentof human T-cell leukemia virus type 1longterminal repeat. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1:466-472.
22.Mosher, D. A., P. A.Kreig,M.R.Regagliati,T.Maniatis,K.Zinn,and M. R.Green. 1984. Efficient in vitrosynthesisofbiologicallyactive RNA and RNAhybridizationprobesfromplasmidscontainingabacteriophageSP6 pro-moter.Nucleic AcidsRes. 12:7035-7056.
23.Feinberg, A. P., and B.Vogelstein. 1984.Atechnique forradiolabeling
DNArestriction endonucleasefragmentstohighspecificactivity.Anal. Biochem. 132:6-13.
24.Prochownik,E. V., and J. Kukowska. 1986.Deregulatedexpressionof c-mycbymurine erythroleukemiacells prevents differentiation. Nature(Lond.).
322:848-850.
25. Khokha, R., P. Waterhouse, S. Yagel, P. K.Lala, C. M. Overall, G. Norton, and D. T.Denhardt. 1989. Antisense-RNA inducedreductionin murine TIMPlevelsconfersoncogenecityon Swiss3T3 cells. Science(Wash.DC).