• No results found

A more accurate half discrete Hilbert type inequality with a non homogeneous kernel

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A more accurate half discrete Hilbert type inequality with a non homogeneous kernel"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

A more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type

inequality with a non-homogeneous kernel

Bicheng Yang

1*

and Xindong Liu

2

*Correspondence:

bcyang@gdei.edu.cn

1Department of Mathematics,

Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510303, China

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

By means of weight functions and the improved Euler-Maclaurin summation formula, a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with a non-homogeneous kernel and a best constant factor is given. A best extension, some equivalent forms, the operator expressions as well as some particular cases are also considered. MSC: 26D15; 47A07

Keywords: Hilbert-type inequality; weight function; equivalent form; operator

1 Introduction

Assuming thatf,gL(R+), f={

f(x)dx}

 > ,g> , we have the following

Hilbert’s integral inequality (cf.[]):

f(x)g(y)

x+y dx dy<πfg, ()

where the constant factor π is best possible. If a= {an}∞n=,b ={bn}∞n= ∈ l, a =

{∞n=an} 

 > ,b> , then we have the following analogous discrete Hilbert’s

inequal-ity:

m=

n=

ambn

m+n<πab, ()

with the same best constant factorπ. Inequalities () and () are important in analysis and its applications (cf.[–]).

In , by introducing an independent parameterλ∈(, ], Yang [] gave an extension of (). For generalizing the results from [], Yang [] gave some best extensions of () and () as follows. Ifp> ,p+q= ,λ+λ=λ,kλ(x,y) is a non-negative homogeneous function of degree –λsatisfyingk(λ) =

kλ(t, )t

λ–dtR

+,φ(x) =xp(–λ)–,ψ(x) =xq(–λ)–,

f(≥)∈Lp,φ(R+) ={f|fp,φ:={ ∞

φ(x)|f(x)|pdx}

p <∞},g()L

q,ψ(R+), andfp,φ,

gq,ψ> , then

kλ(x,y)f(x)g(y)dx dy<k(λ)fpgq,ψ, ()

where the constant factor k(λ) is best possible. Moreover, if kλ(x,y) is finite and

kλ(x,y)–(kλ(x,y)yλ–) is decreasing forx>  (y> ), then fora

m,bn≥,a={am}∞m=∈

(2)

lp,φ ={a|ap,φ:={

n=φ(n)|an|p} 

p <∞}, andb={b

n}∞n=∈lq,ψ, ap,φ, bq,ψ > , we have

m=

n=

kλ(m,n)ambn<k(λ)ap,φbq,ψ, ()

where the constantk(λ) is still the best value. Clearly, forp=q= ,λ= ,k(x,y) =x+y,

λ=λ=, () reduces to (), while () reduces to ().

Some other results about integral and discrete Hilbert-type inequalities can be found in [–]. On half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities with the general non-homogeneous kernels, Hardyet al.provided a few results in Theorem  of []. But they did not prove that the constant factors are best possible. In , Yang [] gave a result with the kernel

(+nx)λ by introducing a variable and proved that the constant factor is best possible. Very

recently, Yang [] and [] gave the following half-discrete Hilbert’s inequality with the best constant factor:

f(x)

n=

an

(x+n)λdx<πfa; ()

Chen [] and Yang [] gave two more accurate half-discrete Mulholland’s inequalities by using Hadamard’s inequality.

In this paper, by means of weight functions and the improved Euler-Maclaurin sum-mation formula, a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with a non-homogeneous kernel and a best constant factor is given as follows. For  <α+β ≤, γR,η≤ –α+β ( +

 +α+β ),

γ

f(x)

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})αandx

<  α+β

γ

(xγ)–α+βf(x)dx

n=

(nη)–α+βan

 

. ()

Moreover, a best extension of (), some equivalent forms, the operator expressions as well as some particular inequalities are considered.

2 Some lemmas

Lemma  If n∈N,s>n,g(y) (y∈[n,s)),g(y) (y∈[s,∞))are decreasing continuous

functions satisfying g(n) –g(s– ) +g(s) > ,g(∞) = ,define a function g(y)as follows:

g(y) := ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

g(y), y∈[n,s),

g(y), y∈[s,∞).

Then there existsε∈[, ]such that

– 

g(n) +ε

g(s) –g(s– )

<

n

ρ(y)g(y)dy< –ε

(3)

whereρ(y) =y– [y] –is a Bernoulli function of the first order.In particular,for g(y) = ,

y∈[n,s),we have g(s) > and

–  g(s) <

s

ρ(y)g(y)dy< 

g(s); ()

for g(y) = ,y∈[s,∞),if g(s– )≥,then it follows g(n) > and

–  g(n) <

s

n

ρ(y)g(y)dy< . ()

Proof Define a decreasing continuous functiong(y) as

g(y) := ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

g(y) +g(s) –g(s– ), y∈[n,s),

g(y), y∈[s,∞).

Then it follows

n

ρ(y)g(y)dy= s

n

ρ(y)g(y)dy+

s

ρ(y)g(y)dy

= s

n

ρ(y)g(y) –g(s) +g(s– )dy+

s

ρ(y)g(y)dy

=

n

ρ(y)g(y)dyg(s) –g(s– )

s

n

ρ(y)dy,

s

n

ρ(y)dy= [s]

n

ρ(y)dy+ s

[s]

ρ(y)dy= s

[s]

y– [s] –  

dy

= 

s– [s] –  

 – 

=ε– 

ε∈[, ].

Sinceg(n) =g(n) +g(s) –g(s– ) > ,g(y) is a non-constant decreasing continuous function withg(∞) =g(∞) = , by the improved Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (cf.[], Theorem ..), it follows

– 

g(n) +g(s) –g(s– )=– g(n) <

n

ρ(y)g(y)dy< ,

and then in view of the above results and by simple calculation, we have ().

Lemma  If <α+β≤,γR,η≤ –α+β ( +

 +α+β ),andω(n)and(x)are weight functions given by

ω(n) :=

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})α

(nη)α–β

(xγ)–α–β dx, nN, ()

(x) :=

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})α

(xγ)α–β

(4)

then we have

(x) <ω(n) = 

α+β. ()

Proof Substitutingt= (xγ)(nη) in (), and by simple calculation, we have

ω(n) =

(min{,t})β (max{,t})αt

α–β  –dt

= 

tβ+α–β –dt+

t–α+α–β –dt=

α+β.

For fixedx>γ, we find

h(x,y) := (xγ)α–β (min{, (xγ)(yη)})

β

(max{, (xγ)(yη)})α(yη)

α–β  –

= ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

(xγ)α+β (yη) α+β

 –, η<y<η+  x–γ, (xγ)–α+β(yη)

α+β

 –, yη+x–γ,

hy(x,y) = ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

–( –α+β )(xγ)α+β (yη) α+β

 –, η<y<η+  x–γ, –(α+β + )(xγ)–α+β(yη)α+β –, yη+

x–γ,

η

h(x,y)dyt=(x–γ=)(y–η)

(min{,t})β (max{,t})αt

α–β

 –dt=

α+β.

By the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (cf.[]), it follows

(x) =

n=

h(x,n) =

h(x,y)dy+

h(x, ) +

ρ(y)hy(x,y)dy

=

η

h(x,y)dyR(x) = 

α+βR(x),

R(x) := 

η

h(x,y)dy– h(x, ) –

ρ(y)hy(x,y)dy. ()

(i) For  <xγ <–η , we obtain –h(x, ) = –(xγ)α+β ( –η) α+β

 –, and

η

h(x,y)dy= (xγ)α+β

η

(yη)α+β –dy=( –η) α+β

α+β (xγ)

α+β.

Setting g(y) := –hy(x,y), wherefrom g(y) = ( – α+β )(xγ)α+β (yη) α+β

 –, g(y) =

(α+β + )(xγ)–α+β (yη)α+β –and

g

η+ 

xγ

g

η+ 

xγ

– 

=

α+β  + 

(xγ)–

 –α+β

(xγ)

(5)

then by (), we find

ρ(y)hy(x,y)dy=

ρ(y)g(y)dy

>– 

g() +g

η+ 

xγ

g

η+ 

xγ

– 

=– 

 –α+β

(xγ)α+β( –η) α+β

 –+ (α+β)(xγ)

>– 

 –α+β

( –η)α+β –(xγ) α+β

+ (α+β)( –η)α+β –(xγ) α+β

 –(xγ)

=– 

 +α+β

( –η)α+β –(xγ)α+β

.

In view of () and the above results, since forη≤ –α+β ( +

 +α+β ), namely  –η

α+β  ( +

 +α+β ), it follows

R(x) > 

α+β( –η)

α+β

(xγ)α+β

(xγ)

α+β

( –η)α+β –

– 

 +α+β

( –η)α+β –(xγ)α+β

=

( –η)

α+β

( –η)

 –

 +α+β 

(xγ)α+β

( –η)–α+β ≥.

(ii) Forxγ–η , we obtain –h(x, ) = –(xγ)–α+β( –η)α+β

 –, and

η

h(x,y)dy= η+x–γ

η

(xγ)α+β

(yη)–α+βdy+

η+x–γ

(xγ)–α+β

(yη)α+β + dy

= 

α+β – 

α+β( –η)

α+β(xγ)α+β

≥ ( –η)– α+β

α+β (xγ)

α+β ( –η)–

α+β

α+β (xγ) –α+β

= 

α+β( –η)

α+β (xγ)α+β .

Since fory≥,yηx–γ , by the improved Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (cf.[]), it follows

ρ(y)hy(x,y)dy=

α+β  + 

(xγ)–α+β

ρ(y)(yη)–α+β –dy

> – 

α+β  + 

(xγ)–α+β( –η)α+β

(6)

In view of () and the above results, for  –ηα+β ( +

 +α+β ), we find

R(x) > 

α+β( –η)

α+β (xγ)α+β  ( –η)

α+β –(xγ)α+β

–  

α+β  + 

( –η)–α+β –(xγ)α+β

>

( –η)

α+β

 –η  –

 +α+β 

(xγ)–α+β

( –η)+α+β ≥.

Hence, forx>γ, we haveR(x) > , and then () follows.

Lemma  Let the assumptions of Lemmabe fulfilled and,additionally,let p> ,p+q= ,

an≥,nN, f(x)be a non-negative measurable function in(γ,∞).Then we have the following inequalities:

J:=

n=

(nβ)p(α–β) –

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})αf(x)dx

pp

α+β

q

γ

(x)(xγ)p(–α–β )–fp(x)dx

p

, ()

L:=

γ

(xα)q(α–β) –

[(x)]q–

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βa

n

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})α q

dx

q

α+β

n=

(nη)q(–α–β )–aq n

q

. ()

Proof Settingk(x,n) :=(max(min{{,(,(xx–γ–γ)()(nn–η)–η)}}))βα, by Hölder’s inequality (cf.[]) and (), it follows

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})αf(x)dx

p

=

γ

k(x,n)

(xγ)(–α–β )/q

(nη)(–α–β )/pf(x)

(nγ)(–α–β )/p

(xγ)(–α–β )/q

dx

p

γ

k(x,n)(xγ)

(–α–β )(p–)

(nη)–α–β

fp(x)dx

×

γ

k(x,n)(nη)

(–α–β )(q–)

(xγ)–α–β dx p–

=ω(n)(nη)q(–α–β )–p–

γ

k(x,n)(xγ)

(–α–β )(p–)

(nη)–α–β f

p(x)dx

=

α+β

p–

(nη)–p(α–β)

γ

k(x,n)(xγ)

(–α–β )(p–)

(nη)–α–β f

(7)

Then by the Lebesgue term-by-term integration theorem (cf.[]), we have

J

α+β

q

n=

γ

k(x,n)(xγ)

(–α–β )(p–)

(nη)–α–β f

p(x)dx

p

=

α+β

q

γ

n=

k(x,n)(xγ)

(–α–β )(p–)

(nη)–α–β f

p(x)dx

p

=

α+β

q

γ

(x)(xγ)p(–α–β )–fp(x)dx

p

.

Hence, () follows. By Hölder’s inequality again, we have

n=

k(x,n)an

q

=

n=

k(x,n)

(xγ)(–α–β )/q

(nη)(–α–β )/p

×

(nη)(–α–β )/pa n

(xγ)(–α–β )/q

q

n=

k(x,n)(xγ)

(–α–β )(p–)

(nη)–α–β

q–

×

n=

k(x,n)(nη)

(–α–β )(q–)

(xγ)–α–βaqn

= [(x)]

q–

(xγ)q(α–β) –

n=

k(x,n)(nη)

(–α–β )(q–)

(xγ)–α–βaqn.

By the Lebesgue term-by-term integration theorem, we have

L≤

γ

n=

k(x,n)(nη)

(–α–β )(q–)

(xγ)–α–β a

q ndx

q

=

n=

γ

k(x,n)(nη)

(–α–β )(q–)

(xγ)–α–β a

q ndx

q

=

n=

ω(n)(nη)q(–α–β )–aq n

q

,

and in view of (), inequality () follows.

Lemma  Let the assumptions of Lemmabe fulfilled and,additionally,let p> ,p+q= ,

 <ε<p(α+β).Settingf(x) = (xγ)α–β +εp–,x(γ,γ + );f(x) = ,x[γ + ,),and

an= (nη) α–β

 –εq–,nN,then we have

I:=

n= an

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})αf(x)dx

> ε

(α+β)( –η)–ε (α+β )– (ε

p)

εO()

(8)

H:=

γ

(xγ)p(–α–β )–fp(x)dx

p

n=

(nη)q(–α–β )–aq n

q

<  ε

ε( –η)–ε–+ ( –η)–εq. ()

Proof We find

I=

n=

(nη)α–β ––

×

γ+

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})α(xγ)

α–β  +εp–dx

=

n=

(nη)α–β ––

(nη)β

γ+n–η

γ

(xγ)α+β +εp–dx

+ 

(nη)α γ+

γ+n–η

(xγ)–α+β +εp–dx

= α+β (α+β )– (ε

p)

n=

(nη)–ε–– α+β  –

ε

p

n=

(nη)–α+β ––

> α+β (α+β )– (ε

p)

dy

(yη)ε+ –  α+β

 – ε

p

n=

(nη)–α+β –εq–

= ε

(α+β)( –η)–ε (α+β )– (ε

p)

α+βε  –

ε

p

n=

(nη)–α+β –εq–

,

and then () is valid. We obtain

H= γ+

γ

(xγ)ε–dx

p

( –η)–ε–+

n=

(nη)–ε– 

q

<

ε

p

( –η)–ε–+

(yη)–ε–dy

q

= ε

ε( –η)–ε–+ ( –η)–ε

q,

and so () is valid.

3 Main results

We introduce the functions

(x) := (xγ)p(–α–β )– x(γ,), (n) := (nη)q(– α–β

 )– (nN),

wherefrom [(x)]–q= (xγ)qα–β –and [(n)]–p= (nη)pα–β –.

Theorem  If <α+β≤,γR,η≤ –α+β ( + +α+β ),p> ,p+q= ,f(x),an≥,

(9)

equivalent inequalities:

I:=

n=

an

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β (max{, (xγ)(nη)})αf(x)dx

=

γ

f(x)

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βa

n

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})α dx< 

α+βfp,aq,, ()

J=

n=

(n)–p

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βf(x) (max{, (xγ)(nη)})α dx

pp

< 

α+βfp,, ()

L:=

γ

(x)–q

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βa

n

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})α q

dx

q

< 

α+βaq,, ()

where the constant α+βis the best possible in the above inequalities.

Proof The two expressions forIin () follow from the Lebesgue term-by-term integra-tion theorem. By () and (), we have (). By Hölder’s inequality, we have

I =

n=

–q (n)

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βf(x) (max{, (xγ)(nη)})α dx

q(n)a n

Jaq,.

Then by (), we have (). On the other hand, assume that () is valid. Setting

an:=

(n)–p

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βf(x) (max{, (xγ)(nη)})α dx

p–

, nN,

whereJp–=a

q,. By (), we findJ<∞. IfJ= , then () is trivially valid; ifJ> , then by () we have

aqq,=Jq(p–)=Jp=I< 

α+βfp,aq,,

thereforeaqq–,=J<α+β fp,; that is, () is equivalent to (). On the other hand, by

() we have [(x)]–q> (α+β)

–q. Then in view of (), we have (). By Hölder’s inequality,

we find

I =

γ

p(x)f(x)

–p(x)

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βa

n

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})α

dx

(10)

Then by (), we have (). On the other hand, assume that () is valid. Setting

f(x) :=(x)–q

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})βa

n

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})α q–

, x∈(γ,∞),

thenLq–=f

p,. By (), we findL<∞. IfL= , then () is trivially valid; ifL> , then

by (), we have

fpp,=Lp(q–)=I< 

α+βfp,aq,,

thereforefpp–,=L< α+β aq,; that is, () is equivalent to (). Hence, (), () and () are equivalent.

If there exists a positive numberk(≤α+β ) such that () is valid as we replaceα+β withk, then, in particular, it follows thatI<kH. In view of () and (), we have

(α+β)( –η)–ε (α+β )– (ε

p)

εO() <( –η)–ε–+ ( –η)–ε

q,

andα+β ≤k(ε→+). Hence,k=

α+β is the best value of ().

By the equivalence of the inequalities, the constant factorα+β in () and () is the best

possible.

Remark  (i) Define the first type half-discrete Hilbert-type operatorT:Lp,(γ,∞)→ lp,–pas follows. ForfLp,(γ,∞), we defineTflp,–pby

Tf(n) =

γ

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})αf(x)dx, nN.

Then by (),Tfp,–p≤ 

α+βfp,and soTis a bounded operator withT ≤  α+β. Since by Theorem  the constant factor in () is best possible, we haveT=α+β .

(ii) Define the second type half-discrete Hilbert-type operatorT:lq,→Lq,–q(γ,∞)

as follows. Foralq,, we defineTaLq,–q(γ,∞) by

Ta(x) =

n=

(min{, (xγ)(nη)})β

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})αan, x∈(γ,∞).

Then by (),Taq,–q≤ 

α+βaq,and soTis a bounded operator withT ≤  α+β. Since by Theorem  the constant factor in () is best possible, we haveT=α+β .

Remark  (i) Forp=q= , () reduces to (). Since we find

min <α+β≤

 –α+β

 +

 + 

α+β

= min <α+β≤

 –α+β  –

 

(α+β)+ (α+β)

= –

  = .

(11)

then forη=γ =  in (), we have the following inequality:

n=

an

(min{,xn})β (max{,xn})αf(x)dx

<  α+β

xp(–α–β )–fp(x)dx

p

n=

nq(–α–β )–aq n

q

. ()

Hence, () is a more accurate inequality of ().

(ii) Forβ=  in (), we have  <α≤,γR,η≤ –α( +

 +α), and

n=

an

γ

f(x)dx

(max{, (xγ)(nη)})α

< α

γ

(xγ)p(–α)–fp(x)dx

p

n=

(nη)q(–α)–aq n

q

; ()

forα=  in (), we have  <β≤,γR,η≤ –β( +

 +β), and

n=

an

γ

min, (xγ)(nη)βf(x)dx

< β

γ

(xγ)p(+β)–fp(x)dx

p

n=

(nη)q(+β)–aq n

q

; ()

forβ=α=λin (), we have  <λ≤,γR,η≤ –λ ( +

 +λ), and

n=

an

γ

min{, (xγ)(nη)} max{, (xγ)(nη)}

λ

f(x)dx

< λ

γ

(xγ)p–fp(x)dx

p

n=

(nη)q–aqn

q

. ()

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

BY carried out the molecular genetic studies participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. XL conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Department of Mathematics, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510303, China. 2Department of Mathematics, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong 526061, China.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (No. 7004344).

(12)

References

1. Hardy, GH, Littlewood, JE, Pólya, G: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1934)

2. Mitrinovi´c, DS, Peˇcari´c, JE, Fink, AM: Inequalities Involving Functions and Their Integrals and Derivatives. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1991)

3. Yang, B: Hilbert-Type Integral Inequalities. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah (2009) 4. Yang, B: Discrete Hilbert-Type Inequalities. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah (2011) 5. Yang, B: On Hilbert’s integral inequality. J. Math. Anal. Appl.220, 778-785 (1998) 6. Yang, B: The Norm of Operator and Hilbert-Type Inequalities. Science Press, Beijing (2009)

7. Yang, B, Brneti´c, I, Krni´c, M, Peˇcari´c, J: Generalization of Hilbert and Hardy-Hilbert integral inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl.8(2), 259-272 (2005)

8. Krni´c, M, Peˇcari´c, J: Hilbert’s inequalities and their reverses. Publ. Math. (Debr.)67(3-4), 315-331 (2005)

9. Jin, J, Debnath, L: On a Hilbert-type linear series operator and its applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl.371, 691-704 (2010) 10. Azar, L: On some extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality and applications. J. Inequal. Appl.2008, 546829 (2008) 11. Yang, B, Rassias, T: On the way of weight coefficient and research for Hilbert-type inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl.

6(4), 625-658 (2003)

12. Arpad, B, Choonghong, O: Best constant for certain multilinear integral operator. J. Inequal. Appl.2006, 28582 (2006) 13. Kuang, J, Debnath, L: On Hilbert’s type inequalities on the weighted Orlicz spaces, pacific. J. Appl. Math.1(1), 95-103

(2007)

14. Zhong, W: The Hilbert-type integral inequality with a homogeneous kernel ofλ-degree. J. Inequal. Appl.2008, 917392 (2008)

15. Yang, B: A new Hilbert-type operator and applications. Publ. Math. (Debr.)76(1-2), 147-156 (2010) 16. Li, Y, He, B: On inequalities of Hilbert’s type. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.76(1), 1-13 (2007)

17. Yang, B: A mixed Hilbert-type inequality with a best constant factor. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math.20(3), 319-328 (2005) 18. Yang, B: A half-discrete Hilbert’s inequality. J. Guangdong Educ. Inst.31(3), 1-7 (2011)

19. Yang, B, Chen, Q: A half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with a homogeneous kernel and an extension. J. Inequal. Appl.2011, 124 (2011). doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2011-124

20. Chen, Q, Yang, B: On a more accurate half-discrete Mulholland’s inequality and an extension. J. Inequal. Appl.2012, 70 (2012). doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-70

21. Yang, B: A new half-discrete Mulholland-type inequality with parameters. Ann. Funct. Anal.3(1), 142-150 (2012) 22. Kuang, J: Applied Inequalities. Shangdong Science Technic Press, Jinan (2004)

23. Kuang, J: Introduction to Real Analysis. Hunan Education Press, Chansha (1996)

doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-292

References

Related documents

The important factors affecting Sudanese women fertility are delaying the age of marriage, increasing migration rates, increasing the average of age at the first

the malignant wound appearance showed that 29.5% were malignant ulcerative wounds, 4.31% were ulcerated malignant fungal wounds, 1.43% were malignant fungal wounds and the

Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India and Microbial Type Culture Collection centre, Institution of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Chandigarh, India. Antibacterial Assay:

Vijay Patil, Evaluation of antihistaminic activity of Piper betel leaf in guinea pig, African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. Satyavati GV, Raina MK, Sharma M.

CONCLUSION: Sustained release microparticles were successfully prepared employing ionotropic gelation technique where the natural water soluble polymer, namely,

To begin investigating the mechanisms by which Erm restricts the developmental potential of immature INPs, we examined whether overexpression of erm can substitute for the function of

Fetih et al ., developed suitable film formulations of ketorolac tromethamine (KT) for transdermal use by using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), sodium carboxymethylcellulose

The microemulsion systems containing oleic acid as the oil phase showed the maximum solubility for Glibenclamide (Table 4).. It was about three fold when compared