• No results found

On Upper and Lower

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On Upper and Lower "

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Volume 2012, Article ID 931656,17pages doi:10.1155/2012/931656

Research Article

On Upper and Lower

β

μ

X

, μ

Y

-Continuous

Multifunctions

Chawalit Boonpok

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand

Correspondence should be addressed to Chawalit Boonpok,chawalit boonpok@hotmail.com

Received 9 May 2012; Accepted 24 June 2012

Academic Editor: B. N. Mandal

Copyrightq2012 Chawalit Boonpok. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative

Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

A new class of multifunctions, called upperlowerβμX, μY-continuous multifunctions, has been

defined and studied. Some characterizations and several properties concerning upperlower

βμX, μY-continuous multifunctions are obtained. The relationships between upper lower

βμX, μY-continuous multifunctions and some known concepts are also discussed.

1. Introduction

General topology has shown its fruitfulness in both the pure and applied directions. In reality it is used in data mining, computational topology for geometric design and molecular design, computer-aided design, computer-aided geometric design, digital topology, information system, and noncommutative geometry and its application to particle physics. One can observe the influence made in these realms of applied research by general topological spaces, properties, and structures. Continuity is a basic concept for the study of general topological spaces. This concept has been extended to the setting of multifunctions and has been generalized by weaker forms of open sets such asα-open sets1, semiopen sets

2, preopen sets 3, β-open sets 4, and semi-preopen sets 5. Multifunctions and of course continuous multifunctions stand among the most important and most researched points in the whole of the mathematical science. Many different forms of continuous multifunctions have been introduced over the years. Some of them are semicontinuity

6, α-continuity 7, precontinuity 8, quasicontinuity 9, γ-continuity 10, and δ-precontinuity 11. Most of these weaker forms of continuity, in ordinary topology such as α-continuity and β-continuity, have been extended to multifunctions 12–15. Cs´asz´ar

(2)

these classes, respectively. Specifically, he introduced the notions of continuous functions on generalized topological spaces and investigated the characterizations of generalized continuous functions. Kanibir and Reilly17extended these concepts to multifunctions. The purpose of the present paper is to define upperlowerβμX, μY-continuous multifunctions

and to obtain several characterizations of upperlowerβμX, μY-continuous multifunctions

and several properties of such multifunctions. Moreover, the relationships between upper

lowerβμX, μY-continuous multifunctions and some known concepts are also discussed.

2. Preliminaries

Let X be a nonempty set, and denote PX the power set ofX. We call a class μ ⊆ PX a generalized topology briefly, GT onX if ∅ ∈ μ, and an arbitrary union of elements of μ belongs toμ16. A setXwith a GTμon it is said to be a generalized topological spacebriefly, GTSand is denoted byX, μ. For a GTSX, μ, the elements ofμare calledμ-open sets and

the complements of μ-open sets are called μ-closed sets. For A ⊆ X, we denote by cμA the intersection of allμ-closed sets containingA and byiμAthe union of allμ-open sets contained inA. Then, we haveiμiμA iμA,cμcμA cμA, andiμA XcμX

A. According to18, forA ⊆ XandxX, we havexcμAif and only ifxMμ impliesM∩A/∅. LetB ⊆ PXsatisfy∅ ∈ B. Then all unions of some elements ofBconstitute a GTμB, andBis said to be a base forμB 19. Letμbe a GT on a setX /∅. Observe that Xμmust not hold; if all the sameXμ, then we say that the GTμis strong20. In general, letMμ denote the union of all elements ofμ; of course,Mμ ∈ μandMμ X if and only if μis a strong GT. Let us now consider those GT’sμthat satisfy the folllowing condition: if M,Mμ, thenMMμ. We will call such a GT quasitopologybriefly QT 21; the QTs clearly are very near to the topologies.

A subsetRof a generalized topological spaceX, μis said to beμr-open18 resp.μr

-closedifR iμcμR resp.R cμiμR. A subsetAof a generalized topological space

X, μis said to beμ-semiopen22 resp.μ-preopen,μ-α-open, andμ-β-openifA ⊆cμiμA

resp.A ⊆iμcμA,A ⊆iμcμiμA,A ⊆ cμiμcμA. The family of allμ-semiopen

resp. μ-preopen, μ-α-open, μ-β-open sets of X containing a pointxX is denoted by σμ, x resp.πμ, x,αμ, x, andβμ, x. The family of allμ-semiopenresp.μ-preopen, μ-α-open,μ-β-opensets of X is denoted byσμ resp.πμ,αμ, and βμ. It is shown in22, Lemma 2.1thatαμ σμπμand it is obvious thatσμπμβμ. The complement of aμ-semiopenresp.μ-preopen,μ-α-open, andμ-β-openset is said to beμ

-semiclosedresp.μ-preclosed,μ-α-closed, andμ-β-closed.

The intersection of all μ-semiclosed resp. μ-preclosed, μ-α-closed, andμ-β-closed sets ofXcontainingAis denoted bycσA.A,cαA, andcβAare defined similarly.

The union of allμ-β-open sets ofXcontained inAis denoted byiβA. Now letK /∅be an index set,Xk/∅forkK, andX

k∈KXkthe Cartesian product

of the setsXk. We denote bypkthe projectionpk :XXk. Suppose that, forkK,ukis a

given GT onXk. Let us consider all sets of the formk∈KXk, whereMkμkand, with the

exception of a finite number of indicesk,Mk Zk Mμk. We denote byBthe collection of

all these sets. Clearly∅ ∈ Bso that we can define a GTμμBhavingBfor base. We callμ the product23of the GT’sμkand denote it byPk∈Kμk.

Let us writei ,c ,ik iμk, andck cμk. Consider in the followingAkXk,

Ak∈KAk,xk∈KXk, andxkpkx.

(3)

Proposition 2.2see24. LetA k∈KAkk∈KXk, and letK0 be a finite subset ofK. If

Ak∈ {Mk, Xk}for eachkKK0, theniAk∈KikAk.

Proposition 2.3see23. The projectionpkisμ, μk-open.

Proposition 2.4see23. If everyμkis strong, thenμis strong andpkisμ, μk-continuous for

kK.

Throughout this paper, the spaces X, μX and Y, μY or simply X and Yalways

mean generalized topological spaces. By a multifunctionF : XY, we mean a point-to-set correspondence fromX intoY, and we always assume thatFx/∅ for allxX. For a multifunctionF : XY, we will denote the upper and lower inverse of a setGofY by FGandFG, respectively, that isFG {xX :FxG}andFG {xX : FxG /∅}. In particular,Fy {xX:yFx}for each pointyY. For eachAX, FA ∪x∈AFx. Then,F is said to be a surjection ifFX Y, or equivalently, if for each yY there exists anxXsuch thatyFx.

3. Upper and Lower

β

μ

X

, μ

Y

-Continuous Multifunctions

Definition 3.1. LetX, μXandY, μYbe generalized topological spaces. A multifunctionF :

XY is said to be

1upperβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxXif, for eachμY-open setVofYcontaining

Fx, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFUV,

2lowerβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxXif, for eachμY-open setV ofYsuch that

FxV /∅, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFzV /∅for everyzU,

3upperresp. lowerβμX, μY-continuous ifFhas this property at each point ofX.

Lemma 3.2. LetAbe a subset of a generalized topological spaceX, μX. Then,

1xcβXAif and only ifAU /for eachUβμX, x,

2cβXXA XiβXA,

3AisμX-β-closed inXif and only ifAcβXA,

4cβXAisμX-β-closed inX.

Theorem 3.3. For a multifunctionF:XY, the following properties are equivalent:

1Fis upperβμX, μY-continuous,

2FV iβXFVfor everyμY-β-open setV ofY,

3FM cβXFMfor everyμY-β-closed setMofY,

4cβXFAFcβYAfor every subsetAofY,

5FiβYAiβXFAfor every subsetAofY.

Proof. 1 ⇒ 2Let V be any μY-β-open set of Y and xFV. Then FxV. There

existsUβμXcontainingxsuch thatFUV. ThusxUFV. This implies that xiβXFV. This shows thatFViβXFV. We haveiβXFVFV. Therefore,

(4)

2⇒3LetMbe anyμY-β-closed set ofY. Then,YMisμY-β-open set, and we have

XFM FYM iβXFYM iβXXFM XcβXFM. Therefore,

we obtaincβXFM FM.

3 ⇒ 4LetAbe any subset ofY. SincecβYAisμY-β-closed, we obtainFA

FcβYA cβXFcβYAandcβXFAFcβYA.

4 ⇒ 5Let A be any subset ofY. We have XiβXFA cβXXFA

cβXFYAFcβYYA FYiβYA XFiβYA. Therefore, we obtain

FiβYAiβXFA.

5 ⇒ 1 LetxX and V be any μY-β-open set ofY containing Fx. Thenx

FV FiβYViβXFV. There exists aμX-β-open setUofXcontainingxsuch that

UFV; henceFUV. This implies thatFis upperβμX, μY-continuous.

Theorem 3.4. For a multifunctionF:XY, the following properties are equivalent:

1Fis lowerβμX, μY-continuous,

2FV iβXFVfor everyμY-β-open setV ofY,

3FM cβXFMfor everyμY-β-closed setMofY,

4cβXFAFcβYAfor every subsetAofY,

5FcβXAcβYFAfor every subsetAofX,

6FiβYAiβXFAfor every subsetAofY.

Proof. We prove only the implications4⇒ 5and5 ⇒6with the proofs of the other

being similar to those of Theorem3.3.

4 ⇒ 5 Let A be any subset of X. By 4, we have cβXAcβXFFA

FcβYFAandFcβXAcβYFA.

5⇒6LetAbe any subset ofY. By5, we haveFcβXFYAcβYFFY

AcβYYA YiβYAandFcβXFYA FcβXXFA FXiβXFA.

This implies thatFiβYAiβXFA.

Definition 3.5. A generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-β-compact if every cover

ofXbyμX-β-open sets has a finite subcover.

A subsetM of a generalized topological space X, μX is said to beμX-β-compact if

every cover ofMbyμX-β-open sets has a finite subcover.

Theorem 3.6. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space. If

F : XY is upperβμX, μY-continuous multifunction such thatFxisμY-β-compact for each

xXandMis aμX-β-compact set ofX, thenFMisμY-β-compact.

Proof. Let{ : γ ∈ Γ} be any cover ofFMbyμY-β-open sets. For each xM,Fxis

μY-β-compact and there exists a finite subset ΓxofΓsuch thatFx ⊆ ∪{ : γ ∈ Γx}.

Now, setVx ∪{:γ∈Γx}. Then we haveFxVxandVxisμY-β-open set ofY.

SinceF is upperβμX, μY-continuous, there exists aμX-β-open setUxcontainingxsuch

thatFUxVx. The family{Ux :xM}is a cover ofMbyμX-β-open sets. Since

MisμX-β-compact, there exists a finite number of points, say,x1, x2, . . . , xn inMsuch that

M⊆ ∪{Uxm:xmM, 1mn}. Therefore, we obtainFM⊆ ∪{FUxm:xmM,1≤

(5)

Corollary 3.7. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space. If

F:XYis upperβμX, μY-continuous surjective multifunction such thatFxisμY-β-compact

for eachxXandX, μXisμX-β-compact, thenY, μYisμY-β-compact.

Definition 3.8. A subsetAof a generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-β-clopen

ifAisμX-β-closed andμX-β-open.

Definition 3.9. A generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-β-connected ifX can

not be written as the union of two nonempty disjointμX-β-open sets.

Theorem 3.10. LetF:XY be upperβμX, μY-continuous surjective multifunction. IfX, μX

isμX-β-connected andFxisμY-β-connected for eachxX, thenY, μYisμY-β-connected.

Proof. Suppose thatY, μYis notμY-β-connected. There exist nonemptyμY-β-open setsUand

VofYsuch thatUV YandUV ∅. SinceFxisμY-connected for eachxX, we have

eitherFxUorFxV. IfxFUV, thenFxUVand hencexFUFV. Moreover, sinceF is surjective, there existxandyinX such thatFxUandFyV; hencexFUandyFV. Therefore, we obtain the following:

1FUFV FUV X,

2FUFV FUV ∅,

3FU/∅andFV/∅.

By Theorem 3.3, FU and FV are μX-β-open. Consequently, X, μX is not μX

-β-connected.

Theorem 3.11. LetF :XY be lowerβμX, μY-continuous surjective multifunction. IfX, μX

isμX-β-connected andFxisμY-β-connected for eachxX, thenY, μYisμY-β-connected.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem3.10and is thus omitted.

Let{:α∈Φ}and{:α∈Φ}be any two families of generalized topological spaces

with the same index setΦ. For eachα∈Φ, let:be a multifunction. The product

space{:α∈Φ}is denoted by

and the product multifunction

:

,

defined by Fx {Fαxα : α ∈ Φ}for each x {xα} ∈ , is simply denoted by

F:.

Theorem 3.12. Let : X be a multifunction for eachα ∈ Φand F : X a

multifunction defined byFx {Fαx : α ∈ Φ}for eachxX. IfF is upperβμX, μYα

-continuous, thenFαis upperβμX, μYα-continuous for eachα∈Φ.

Proof. Let xX and α ∈ Φ, and let be any μYα-open set of containing Fαx.

Therefore, we obtain that−1 ×

{ : γ ∈ Φ and γ /α} is a μYα-open set of

containingFx, where is the natural projection of onto. SinceF is upper

βμX, μYα-continuous, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFUp−1α . Therefore, we

obtain FαUpαFUpαp−1α . This shows that : X is upper

βμX, μYα-continuous for eachα∈Φ.

Theorem 3.13. Let : X be a multifunction for eachα ∈ Φand F : X

a

multifunction defined byFx {Fαx : α ∈ Φ}for eachxX. IfF is upperβμX, μYα

-continuous, thenFαis upperβμX, μYα-continuous for eachα∈Φ.

(6)

4. Upper and Lower Almost

β

μ

X

, μ

Y

-Continuous Multifunctions

Definition 4.1. LetX, μXandY, μYbe generalized topological spaces. A multifunctionF :

XY is said to be

1upper almostβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxX if, for eachμY-open setV ofY

containingFx, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFUiμYcμYV,

2lower almostβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxX if, for eachμY-open setV ofY

such thatFxV /∅, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFziμYcμYV/∅for

everyzU,

3upper almost (resp. lower almost)βμX, μY-continuous ifF has this property at each

point ofX.

Remark 4.2. For a multifunctionF:XY, the following implication holds: upperβμX, μY

-continuous⇒upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

The following example shows that this implication is not reversible.

Example 4.3. Let X {1,2,3,4} and Y {a, b, c, d}. Define a generalized

topol-ogy μX {∅,{1},{1,2},{2,3},{1,2,3}} on X and a generalized topology μY {∅,{a, c},{b, c},{a, b, c}, Y}onY. A multifunctionF:X, μXY, μYis defined as follows:

F1 {b},F2 F4 {d}, andF3 {c}. ThenFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous

but it is not upperβμX, μY-continuous.

A subsetNxof a generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-neighbourhood

of a pointxXif there exists aμX-openUsuch thatxUNx.

Theorem 4.4. For a multifunctionF:XY, the following properties are equivalent:

1Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxX,

2xcμXiμXcμXFcσYVfor everyμY-open setV ofYcontainingFx,

3for eachμX-open neighbourhoodUofxand eachμY-open setVofYcontainingFx, there

exists aμX-open setGofXsuch that/GUandGFcσYV,

4for eachμY-open setV ofY containingFx, there exists UσμX, xsuch thatU

cμXFcσYV.

Proof. 1 ⇒ 2Let V be anyμY-open set ofY such thatFxV. Then there existsU

βμX, xsuch thatFUcσYV iμYcμYV. ThenUFcσYV. SinceUisμX-β-open,

we havexUcμXiμXcμXUcμXiμXcμXFcσYV.

2 ⇒ 3LetV be anyμY-open set ofY containingFxand Ua μX-open set ofX

containing x. SincexcμXiμXcμXFcσYV, we have UiμXcμXFcσYV/∅.

PutG UiμXcμXFcσYV; thenG is a nonemptyμX-open set, GU; and G

iμXcμXFcσYVcμXFcσYV.

3 ⇒ 4Let V be anyμY-open set ofY containing Fx. ByμXx, we denote the

family of allμX-open neighbourhoods ofx. For eachUμXx, there exists aμX-open set

GU of X such that∅/GUUandGUcμXFcσYV. PutW ∪{GU : UμXx};

thenW is aμX-open set ofX,xcμXW, andWcμXFcσYV. Moreover, if we put

(7)

4 ⇒ 1LetV be anyμY-open set ofY containingFx. There existsGσμX, x

such that GcμXFcσYV. Therefore, we obtain xGFVFcσYV

cμXiμXGFcσYVcμXiμXcμXFcσYV iβXFcσYV.

Theorem 4.5. For a multifunctionF:XY, the following properties are equivalent:

1Fis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxofX,

2xcμXiμXcμXFcσYVfor everyμY-open setV ofYsuch thatFxV /∅,

3for anyμX-open neighbourhoodUofxand aμY-open setV ofY such thatFxV /∅,

there exists a nonemptyμX-open setGofXsuch thatGUandGcμFcσYV,

4for anyμY-open setV ofY such thatFxV /∅, there existsUσμX, xsuch that

UcμXFcσYV.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem4.4and is thus omitted.

Theorem 4.6. For a multifunctionF:XY, the following properties are equivalent:

1Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

2for eachxXand eachμY-open setV ofY containingFx, there existsUβμX, x

such thatFUcσYV,

3for eachxXand eachμYr-open setV ofY containingFx, there existsUβμX, x

such thatFUV,

4FVβμXfor everyμYr-open setVofY,

5FMisμX-β-closed inXfor everyμYr-closed setMofY,

6FViβXFcσYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY,

7cβXFiσYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

8cβXFcμYiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

9cβXFcμYiμYcμYAFcμYAfor every subsetAofY,

10iμXcμXiμXFcμYiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

11iμXcμXiμXFiσYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

12FVcμXiμXcμXFcσYVfor everyμY-open setVofY.

Proof. 1⇒2The proof follows immediately from Definition4.11.

2⇒3This is obvious.

3 ⇒ 4LetV be anyμYr-open set ofY andxFV. ThenFxV and there

existsUxβμX, xsuch thatFUxV. Therefore, we havexUxFVand hence

FVβμX.

4⇒5This follows from the fact thatFYM XFMfor every subsetM ofY.

5 ⇒ 6LetV be anyμX-open set ofY andxFV. Then we haveFxV

cσYV and hencexFcσYV XFYcσYV. Since YcσYV isμYr-closed

set of Y,FYcσYV isμX-β-closed in X. Therefore,FcσYVβμX, xand hence

xiβXFcσYV. Consequently, we obtainFViβXFcσYV.

6 ⇒7LetMbe anyμY-closed set ofY. Then, sinceYMisμY-open, we obtain

XFM FYMiβXFcσYYM iβXFYiσYK iβXXFiσYM

(8)

7⇒8The proof is obvious sinceiσYM cμYiμYMfor everyμY-closed setM. 8⇒9The proof is obvious.

9 ⇒ 10 Since iμYcμYiμYAcβYA for every subset A, for every μY

-closed set M of Y, we have iμXcμXiμXFcμYiμYMcβXFcμYiμYM

cβXFcμYiμYcμYMFcμYM FM.

10⇒ 11The proof is obvious sinceiσYM cμYiμYMfor everyμX-closed set

M.

11 ⇒ 12 Let V be any μY-open set of Y. Then YV is μY-closed in Y and

we have iμXcμXiμXFiσYYVFYV XFV. Moreover, we have

iμXcμXiμXFiσYYV iμXcμXiμXFYcσYV iμXcμXiμXXFcσYV

XcμXiμXcμXFcσYV. Therefore, we obtainFVcμXiμXcμXFcσYV. 12⇒1Letxbe any point ofXandV anyμY-open set ofY containingFx. Then

xFVcμXiμXcμXFcσYVand henceFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous at

xby Theorem4.4.

Theorem 4.7. The following are equivalent for a multifunctionF:XY:

1Fis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

2for eachxX and eachμY-open setV ofY such thatFxV /∅, there existsU

βμX, xsuch thatUFcσYV,

3for eachxX and each μYr-open setV ofY such thatFxV /∅, there exists U

βμX, xsuch thatUFV,

4FVβμXfor everyμYr-open setVofY,

5FMisμX-β-closed inXfor everyμYr-closed setMofY,

6FViβXFcσYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY,

7cβXFiσYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

8cβXFcμYiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

9cβXFcμYiμYcμYAFcμYAfor every subsetAofY,

10iμXcμXiμXFcμYiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

11iμXcμXiμXFiσYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

12FVcμXiμXcμXFcσYVfor everyμY-open setVofY.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem4.6and is thus omitted.

Theorem 4.8. The following are equivalent for a multifunctionF:XY:

1Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

2cβXFVFcμYVfor everyVβμY,

3cβXFVFcμYVfor everyVσμY,

4FViβXFiμYcμYVfor everyVπμY.

Proof. 1 ⇒ 2 Let V be any μY-β-open set of Y. Since cμYV is μYr-closed, by

Theorem4.6FcμYVisμX-β-closed inX andFVFcμYV. Therefore, we obtain

cβXFVFcμYV.

(9)

3⇒4LetVπμY. Then, we haveViμYcμYVandYVcμYiμYYV.

SincecμYiμYYVσμY, we haveXFV FYVFcμYiμYYV

cβXFcμYiμYYV cβXFYiμYcμYV cβXXFiμYcμYV X

iβXFiμYcμYV. Therefore, we obtainFViβXFiμYcμYV.

4 ⇒ 1 Let V be any μYr-open set of Y. Since VπμY, we have FV

iβXFiμYcμYV iβXFVand hence FVβμX. It follows from Theorem4.6

thatFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Theorem 4.9. The following are equivalent for a multifunctionF:XY:

1Fis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

2cβXFVFcμYVfor everyVβμY,

3cβXFVFcμYVfor everyVσμY,

4FViβXFiμYcμYVfor everyVπμY.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem4.8and is thus omitted.

For a multifunctionXY, bycμF : XY we denote a multifunction defined

as follows:cμFx cμYFxfor each xX. Similarly, we can definecβF : XY,

cσF :XY,cπF:XY, andcαF :XY.

Theorem 4.10. A multifunctionF : XY is upper almostβμX, μY-continuous if and only if

cσF :XYis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. Suppose thatF is upper almost βμX, μY-continuous. Let xX, and letV be any

μY-open set ofY such thatcσFxV. ThenFxV and by Theorem 4.6there exists

UβμX, xsuch thatFUcβYV. For eachuU,FucσYVand hencecσYFU

cσYV. Therefore, we havecσFUcσYVand by Theorem 4.6cσF is is upper almost

βμX, μY-continuous.

Conversely, suppose thatcσFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and let

V be anyμY-open set ofY containing Fx. Then FxV andcσYFxcσYV. Since

cσYV iμYcμYVisμY-open, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatcσFUcσYcσYV

cσYV. Therefore, we haveFUcσYVand henceFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Definition 4.11. A subset A of a generalized topological space X, μX is said to be μX

-α-paracompact if every cover ofAbyμX-open sets ofXis refined by a cover ofAthat consists of

μX-open sets ofXand is locally finite inX.

Definition 4.12. A subsetAof a generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-α-regular

if, for each pointxAand eachμX-open setUofXcontainingx, there exists aμX-open set

GofXsuch thatxGcμXGU.

Lemma 4.13. IfAis aμX-α-regularμX-α-paracompact subset of a quasitopological spaceX, μX

andUis aμX-open neighbourhood ofA, then there exists aμX-open setGofX such thatAG

cμXGU.

Lemma 4.14. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space. If

F : XY is a multifunction such that FxisμY-α-paracompactμY-α-regular for eachxX,

then for eachμY-open setV ofY GV FV, whereGdenotescβF,cπF,cαF, orcμF.

Proof. LetV be anyμY-open set ofY andxGV. ThusGxV andFxGxV.

(10)

there exists aμY-open setWofY such thatFxWcμYWV; henceGxcμYW

V. Therefore, we havexGVandFVGV.

Theorem 4.15. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space.

LetF : XY be a multifunction such thatFxisμY-α-paracompact andμY-α-regular for each

xX. Then the following are equivalent:

1Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

2cβFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

3cπFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

4cαFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

5cμFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. Similarly to Lemma 4.14, we putG cβF,cπF,cαF, orcμF. First, suppose thatF is

upper almostβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and letV be anyμY-open set ofYcontaining

Gx. By Lemma4.14,xGV FVand there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFU

cσYV. SinceFuisμY-α-paracompact andμY-α-regular for eachuU, by Lemma4.13there

exists aμY-open setHsuch thatFuHcμYHcσYV; henceGucμYHcσYV

for eachuU. This shows thatGis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Conversely, suppose that G is upper almost βμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and

let V be any μY-open set of Y containingFx. By Lemma 4.14,xFV GVand

henceGxV. There existsUβμX, xsuch that GUcσYV. Therefore, we obtain

FUcσYV. This shows thatFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Lemma 4.16. IfF : XY is a multifunction, then for eachμY-open setV ofY, μYGV

FV, whereGdenotescβF,cπF,cαF, orcμF.

Lemma 4.17. cσXV iμXcμXVfor everyμX-preopen setV of a generalized topological space

X, μX.

Theorem 4.18. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space.

For a multifunctionF:XY, the following are equivalent:

1Fis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

2cβFis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

3cσFis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

4cπFis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

5cαFis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

6cμFis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. Similarly to Lemma4.14, we put G cβF,cπF,cσF,cαF, orcμF. First, suppose that

F is lower almostβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and letV be anyμY-open set ofY such

thatGxV /∅. SinceV isμY-open,FxV /∅and there exists UβμX, xsuch that

FucσYV/∅for eachuU. Therefore, we obtainGucσYV/∅for eachuU. This

shows thatGis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Conversely, suppose thatGis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and letV

(11)

UβμX, xsuch thatGucσYV/∅for eachuU. By Lemma4.17cσYV iμYcμYV

andFucσYV/∅for eachuU. Therefore, by Theorem4.7Fis lower almostβμX, μY

-continuous.

For a multifunctionF :XY, the graph multifunctionGF :XX×Y is defined

as follows:GFx {x} ×Fxfor everyxX.

Lemma 4.19see25. The following hold for a multifunctionF :XY:

aGFA×B AFB,

bGFA×B AFB,

for any subsetsAXandBY.

Theorem 4.20. LetF :XY be a multifunction such thatFxisμY-compact for eachxX.

Then, F is upper almost βμX, μY-continuous if and only if GF : XX ×Y is upper almost

βμX, μX×Y-continuous.

Proof. Suppose thatF :XY is upper almostβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and letW

be anyμX×Yr-open set ofX×Y containingGFx. For eachyFx, there existμXr-open

setUyX andμYr-open setVyY such thatx, yUy×VyW. The family {Vy:yFx}is aμY-open cover ofFxandFxisμY-compact. Therefore, there exist

a finite number of points, say,y1, y2,. . .,yninFxsuch thatFx⊆ ∪{Vyi: 1≤in}. Set U ∩{Uyi : 1 ≤ in} andV ∪{Vyi : 1 ≤ in}. ThenUisμX-open inX andV

is μY-open inY and{x} ×Fx ⊆ U × V ⊆ U ×cσYV ⊆ cσX×YW W. SinceF is upper

almostβμX, μY-continuous, there existsU0 ∈βμXcontainingxsuch thatFU0⊆cσYV.

By Lemma4.19, we haveU ∩U0 ⊆ U ∩FcσYV GFU ×cσYVGFW. Therefore,

we obtain U ∩U0 ∈ βμX, x and GFU ∩U0 ⊆ W. This shows that GF is upper almost

βμX, μX×Y-continuous.

Conversely, suppose thatGF :XX×Y is upper almostβμX, μX×Y-continuous.

LetxX, and letV be anyμY-open set ofY containingFx. SinceX×V isμX×Yr-open in

X×YandGFxX×V, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatGFUX×V. By Lemma4.19,

we haveUGFX×V FVandFUV. This shows thatFis upper almostβμX, μY

-continuous.

Theorem 4.21. A multifunctionF : XY is lower almostβμX, μY-continuous if and only if

GF :XX×Y is lower almostβμX, μX×Y-continuous.

Proof. Suppose thatF is lower almostβμX, μY-continuous. Let xX, and let W be any

μX×Yr-open set ofX×Y such thatxGFW. SinceW∩{xFx/∅, there existsyFx

such that x, yW and hence x, yU×VW for some μXr-open setUX and

μYr-open set VY. Since FxV /∅, there existsGβμX, xsuch that GFV.

By Lemma4.19, we haveUGUFV GFU×VGFW. Moreover, we have UGβμX, xand henceGFis lower almostβμX, μX×Y-continuous.

Conversely, suppose thatGF is lower almost βμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and

letV be aμYr-open set ofY such thatxFV. ThenX×V isμX×Yr-open inX ×Y and

GFxX×V {x} ×FxX×V {x} ×FxV/∅. SinceGF is lower almost

βμX, μX×Y-continuous, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatUGFX×V. By Lemma4.19,

we obtainUFV. This shows thatFis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous.

Lemma 4.22. Letf :XY beμX, μY-continuous andμX, μY-open. IfAisμX-β-open inX,

(12)

Theorem 4.23. LetμXα andμYα be strong for eachα∈Φ. If the product multifunctionF:

Yαis upper almostβμXα, μYα-continuous, then : is upper almostβμXα, μYα

-continuous for eachα∈Φ.

Proof. Letγ be an arbitrary fixed index and any μYγr-open set of . ThenV

×

isμYαr-open in

, where γ ∈ Φ andα /γ. SinceF is upper almostβμXα, μYα

-continuous, by Theorem4.6FV ×FγVγisμXα-β-open in. By Lemma4.22,

FγVγisμXγ-β-open inand henceis upper almostβμXγ, μYγ-continuous for eachγ

Φ.

Theorem 4.24. LetμXα andμYα be strong for eachα∈Φ. If the product multifunctionF:

Yαis lower almostβμXα, μYα-continuous, thenFα : is lower almostβμXα, μYα

-continuous for eachα∈Φ.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem4.23and is thus omitted.

Definition 4.25. The μX-β-frontier of a subsetA of a generalized topological spaceX, μX,

denoted byfrβX, is defined byfrβXA cβXAcβXXA cβXAiβXA.

Theorem 4.26. A multifunctionF : XY is not upper almostβμX, μY-continuous (lower

almostβμX, μY-continuous) atxX if and only ifxis in the union of theμX-β-frontier of the

upper (lower) inverse images ofμXr-open sets containing (meeting)Fx.

Proof. Let x be a point of X at which F is not upper almost βμX, μY-continuous. Then,

there exists aμYr-open setV ofY containingFxsuch thatUXFV/∅for every

UβμX, x. By Lemma 3.2, we have xcβXXFV. Since xFV, we obtain

xcβXFVand hencexfrβXFV.

Conversely, suppose that V is a μYr-open set containing Fx such that x

frβXFV. IfFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous atx, then there existsUβμX, x

such thatFUV. Therefore, we obtainxUiβXFV. This is a contradiction to

xfrβXFV. ThusF is not upper almostβμX, μY-continuous atx. The case of lower

almostβμX, μY-continuous is similarly shown.

Definition 4.27. A subsetAof a generalized topological spaceX, μis said to beμX-α-nearly

paracompact if every cover ofAbyμX-regular open sets ofXis refined by a cover ofAwhich

consists ofμX-open sets ofXand is locally finite inX.

Definition 4.28see26. A spaceX, μXis said to beμX-Hausdorff if, for any pair of distinct

points x and y of X, there exist disjoint μX-open sets U and V of X containing x and y,

respectively.

Theorem 4.29. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space.

IfF :XY is upper almostβμX, μY-continuous multifunction such thatFxisμY-α-nearly

paracompact for eachxXandY, μYisμY-Hausdorff, then, for eachx, yX×YGF, there

existUβμX, xand aμY-open setV containingysuch thatU×cμYVGF ∅.

Proof. Letx, yX×YGF; thenyYFx. SinceY, μYisμY-Hausdorff, for each

zFxthere existμY-open setsVzandWycontainingzandy, respectively, such that

VzWy ∅; henceiμcμVzWy ∅. The familyV{iμcμVz:zFx}is a cover ofFxbyμY-regular open sets ofYandFxisμY-α-nearly paracompact. There exists

a locally finiteμY-open refinementH { :γ ∈ Γ}ofVsuch thatFx⊆ ∪{ :γ ∈Γ}.

SinceHis locally finite, there exists aμY-open neighbourhoodW0ofYand a finite subsetΓ0

(13)

thatVzγ. Now, putMW0∩∩{Wzγ:γ ∈Γ0}andN∪{ :γ∈Γ}. Then Mis aμY-open neighbourhood ofy,NisμY-open inY, andM ∩ N∅. Therefore, we obtain

Fx⊆ NandcμYM∩ N∅and henceFxYcμYM. SinceMisμY-open,YcμYM

isμY-regular open inY. SinceFis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous, by Theorem4.6, there

existsUβμ, xsuch thatFUYcμYM, henceFUcμYM ∅. Therefore, we

obtainU×cμYVGF ∅.

Corollary 4.30. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space.

IfF :XY is upper almostβμX, μY-continuous multifunction such thatFxisμ-compact for

eachxXandY, μYisμY-Hausdorff, then for eachx, yX×YGF, there existUβμ, x

and aμ-open setVcontainingysuch thatU×cμVGF ∅.

Corollary 4.31. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space.

IfF :XY is upper almostβμX, μY-continuous such thatFxisμX-α-nearly paracompact for

eachxXandY, μYisμY-Hausdorff, thenGFisμX×Y-β-closed inX×Y.

Proof. By Theorem4.29, for eachx, yX×YGF, there existUβμX, xand aμY-open

setV containingysuch thatU×cμYVGF ∅. SincecμYVisμY-semiopen, it isμY

-β-open and henceU×cμYVis aμX×Y-β-open set ofX×Y containingx, y. Therefore,GFis

μX×Y-β-closed inX×Y.

5. Upper and Lower Weakly

β

μ

X

, μ

Y

-Continuous Multifunctions

Definition 5.1. LetX, μXandX, μYbe generalized topological spaces. A multifunctionF :

XY is said to be

1upper weakly βμX, μY-continuous at a point xX if, for each μY-open set V of

containingFx, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFUcμYV,

2lower weaklyβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxX if, for eachμY-open setV ofY

such thatFxV /∅, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFzcμYV/∅for every

zU,

3upper weakly (resp. lower weakly)βμX, μY-continuous ifFhas this property at each

point ofX.

Remark 5.2. For a multifunctionF :XY, the following implication holds: upper almost

βμX, μY-continuous⇒upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous.

The following example shows that this implication is not reversible.

Example 5.3. Let X {1,2,3,4} and Y {a, b, c, d}. Define a generalized topologyμX

{∅,{4},{1,2,3}, X}onX and a generalized topologyμY {∅,{d}{a, c},{a, c, d},{b, c, d}, Y}

onY. Define F : X, μXY, μY as follows:F1 {a},F2 {b},F3 {c}, and

F4 {d}. ThenFis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous but it is not upper almostβμX, μY

-continuous.

Theorem 5.4. LetF :XY be a multifunction. ThenFis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous at

a pointxXif and only ifxiβXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofYcontainingFx.

Proof. Suppose thatFis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous at a pointxX. LetVbe anyμY

-open set ofY containingFx. There existsUβμXcontainingxsuch thatFUcμYV.

(14)

Conversely, suppose thatxiβXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofYcontaining

Fx. LetxX, and letVbe anyμY-open set ofY containingFx. ThenxiβXFcμYV.

There existsUβμXcontainingxsuch thatUFcμYV; henceFUcμYV. This

implies thatFis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous at a pointx.

Theorem 5.5. LetF :XYbe a multifunction. ThenFis upper weaklyαμX, μY-continuous at

a pointxXif and only ifxiβXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setVofYsuch thatFxV /∅.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem5.4.

Theorem 5.6. The following are equivalent for a multifunctionF:XY:

1Fis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous,

2FVcμXiμXcμXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY,

3iμXcμXiμXFiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

4cβXFiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

5cβXFiμYcμYAFcμYAfor every subsetAofY,

6FiμYAiβXFcμYiμYAfor every subsetAofY,

7FViβXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY,

8cβXFiμYMFMfor everyμYr-closed setMofY,

9cβXFVFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY.

Proof. 1 ⇒ 2Let V be anyμY-open set ofY andxFV. ThenFxV and there

existsUβμX, xsuch thatFUcμYV. Therefore, we havexUFcμYV. Since

UβμX, x, we havexUcμXiμXcμXFcμYV.

2⇒3LetMbe anyμY-closed set ofY. ThenYMis aμY-open set inY. By3,

we haveFYMcμXiμXcμXFcμYYM. By the straightforward calculations, we

obtainiμXcμXiμXFiμYMFM.

3⇒4LetMbe anyμY-closed set ofY. Then, we haveiμXcμXiμXFiμYM

FMand hencecβXFiμYMFM.

4 ⇒5LetAbe any subset ofY. Then,cμYAisμY-closed inY. Therefore, by5

we havecβXFiμYcμYAFcμYA.

5 ⇒ 6Let Abe any subset ofY. Then, we obtainXFiμYA FcμYY

AcβXFiμYcμYYA cβXFYcμYiμYA cβXXFcμYiμYA

XiβXFcμYiμYA. Therefore, we obtainFiμYAiβXFcμYiμYB. 6⇒7The proof is obvious.

7⇒1LetxX, and letVbe anyμY-open set ofYcontainingFx. Then, we obtain

xiβXFcμYVand henceFis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous atxby Theorem5.4. 4⇒8The proof is obvious.

8 ⇒ 9LetV be anyμY-open set ofY. ThencμYVisμY-regular closed inY and

hence we havecβXFVcβXFiμYcμYVFcμYV.

9⇒7LetV be anyμY-open set ofY. Then we haveXiβXFcμYV cμXX

FcμYV cμXFYcμYVFcμYYcμYV XFiμYcμYV. Therefore, we

obtainFVFiμYcμYViβXFcμYV.

Theorem 5.7. The following are equivalent for a multifunctionF:XY:

(15)

2FVcμXiμXcμXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY,

3iμXcμXiμXFiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

4cβXFiμYMFMfor everyμY-closed setMofY,

5cβXFiμYcμYAFcμYAfor every subsetAofY,

6FiμYAiβXFcμYiμYAfor every subsetAofY,

7FViβXFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY,

8cβXFiμYMFMfor everyμYr-closed setMofY,

9cβXFVFcμYVfor everyμY-open setV ofY.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem5.6.

Theorem 5.8. LetX, μXbe a generalized topological space andY, μYa quasitopological space. For

a multifunctionF:XY such thatFxis aμY-α-regularμY-α-paracompact set for eachxX,

the following are equivalent:

1Fis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous,

2Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

3Fis upperβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. 1⇒ 3Suppose thatFis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and letG

be aμY-open set ofY such thatFxG. SinceFxisμY-α-regularμY-α-paracompact, by

Lemma4.13there exists aμY-open setV such thatFxVcμYVG. SinceFis upper

weaklyβμX, μY-continuous atxandFxV, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFU

cμYVand henceFUcμYVG. Therefore,Fis upperβμX, μY-continuous.

Definition 5.9. A generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-compact if every cover

ofXbyμX-open sets has a finite subcover.

A subsetMof a generalized topological spaceX, μXis said to beμX-compact if every

cover ofMbyμX-open sets has a finite subcover.

Definition 5.10. A spaceX, μXis said to beμX-regular if for eachμX-closed setF and each

pointx /F, there exist disjointμX-open setsUandVsuch thatxUandFV.

Corollary 5.11. LetF :XY be a multifunction such thatFxisμX-compact for eachxX

andY, μYisμY-regular. Then, the following are equivalent:

1Fis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous,

2Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

3Fis upperβμX, μY-continuous.

Lemma 5.12. IfAis aμX-α-regular set ofX, then, for everyμX-open setUwhich intersectsA, there

exists aμX-open setVsuch thatAV /andcμXVU.

Theorem 5.13. For a multifunctionF :XY such thatFxis aμY-α-regular set ofY for each

xX, the following are equivalent:

(16)

2Fis lower almostβμX, μY-continuous,

3Fis lowerβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. 1 ⇒ 3Suppose thatF is lower weaklyβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and let

Gbe aμY-open set of Y such thatFxG /∅. SinceFxisμX-α-regular, by Lemma 5.12

there exists aμY-open setV of Y such thatFxV /∅and cμYVG. SinceF is lower

weaklyβμX, μY-continuous atx, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFucμYV/∅ for

eachuU. SincecμYVG, we haveFuG /∅ for eachuU. Therefore,F is lower

βμX, μY-continuous.

Definition 5.14. A spaceX, μXis said to beμX-normal if for every pair of disjointμX-closed

setsFandF, there exist disjointμX-open setsUandV such thatFUandFV.

Theorem 5.15. LetF :XY be a multifunction such thatFxisμY-closed inY for eachxX

andY, μYisμY-normal. Then, the following are equivalent:

1Fis upper weaklyβμX, μY-continuous,

2Fis upper almostβμX, μY-continuous,

3Fis upperβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. 1⇒3: Suppose thatFis lower weaklyβμX, μY-continuous. LetxX, and letG

be aμY-open set ofY containingFx. SinceFxisμY-closed inY, by theμY-normality ofY

there exists aμY-open setV ofY such thatFxVcμYVG. SinceF is upper weakly

βμX, μY-continuous, there existsUβμX, xsuch thatFUcμYVG. This shows that

Fis upperβμX, μY-continuous.

Theorem 5.16. IfF :XY is lower almostβμX, μY-continuous multifunction such thatFx

isμY-semiopen inYfor eachxX, thenFis lowerβμX, μY-continuous.

Proof. LetxX, and letV be aμY-open set ofYsuch thatFxV /∅. By Theorem4.7there

existsUβμX, xsuch thatFucσYV/∅for eachuU. SinceFuisμY-semiopen in

Y,FuV /∅for eachuUand henceFis lowerβμX, μY-continuous.

Acknowledgment

This research was financially supported by Mahasarakham University.

References

1 O. Nj ˙astad, “On some classes of nearly open sets,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 15, pp. 961–970,

1965.

2 N. Levine, “Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces,” The American Mathematical

Monthly, vol. 70, pp. 36–41, 1963.

3 A. S. Mashhour, M. E. Abd El-Monsef, and S. N. El-Deeb, “On precontinuous and weakprecontinuous

functions,” Proceedings of the Mathematical and Physical Society of Egypt, vol. 53, pp. 47–53, 1982.

4 M. E. Abd El-Monsef, S. N. El-Deeb, and R. A. Mahmoud, “β-open sets andβ-continuous mapping,”

Bulletin of the Faculty of Science. Assiut University, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 1983.

5 D. Andrijevi´c, “Semipreopen sets,” Matematiˇcki Vesnik, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 1986.

6 V. I. Ponomarev, “Properties of topological spaces preserved under multivalued continuousmappings

on compacta,” American Mathematical Society Translations, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 119–140, 1964.

7 T. Neubrunn, “Strongly quasi-continuous multivalued mappings,” in General Topology and Its Relations

(17)

8 V. Popa, “Some properties ofH-almost continuous multifunctions,” Problemy Matematyczne, no. 10, pp. 9–26, 1990.

9 V. Popa, “Sur certaines formes faibles de continuit´e pour les multifonctions,” Revue Roumaine de

Math´ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ees, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 539–546, 1985.

10 M. E. Abd El-Monsef and A. A. Nasef, “On multifunctions,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 12, no.

13, pp. 2387–2394, 2001.

11 J. H. Park, B. Y. Lee, and M. J. Son, “On upper and lowerδ-precontinuous multifunctions,” Chaos,

Solitons and Fractals, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1231–1237, 2004.

12 V. Popa and T. Noiri, “On upper and lowerα-continuous multifunctions,” Math. Slovaca, vol. 43, pp.

381–396, 1996.

13 V. Popa and T. Noiri, “On upper and lowerβ-continuous multifunctions,” Real Analysis Exchange, vol.

22, no. 1, pp. 362–376, 1996.

14 T. Noiri and V. Popa, “On upper and lower almostβ-continuous multifunctions,” Acta Mathematica

Hungarica, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 57–73, 1999.

15 V. Popa and T. Noiri, “On upper and lower weaklyα-continuous multifunctions,” Novi Sad Journal of

Mathematics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 7–24, 2002.

16 A. Cs´asz´ar, “Generalized topology, generalized continuity,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 96, no.´

4, pp. 351–357, 2002.

17 A. Kanibir and I. L. Reilly, “Generalized continuity for multifunctions,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica,

vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 283–292, 2009.

18 A. Cs´asz´ar, “´ δ-andθ-modifications of generalized topologies,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 120,

pp. 274–279, 2008.

19 A. Cs´asz´ar, “Modification of generalized topologies via hereditary classes,” Acta Mathematica Hungar-´

ica, vol. 115, no. 1-2, pp. 29–36, 2007.

20 A. Cs´asz´ar, “Extremally disconnected generalized topologies,” Annales Universitatis Scientiarum´

Budapestinensis, vol. 47, pp. 91–96, 2004.

21 A. Cs´asz´ar, “Further remarks on the formula for´ γ-interior,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 113, no.

4, pp. 325–332, 2006.

22 A. Cs´asz´ar, “Generalized open sets in generalized topologies,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 106,´

no. 1-2, pp. 53–66, 2005.

23 A. Cs´asz´ar, “Product of generalized topologies,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp.´

127–132, 2009.

24 R. Shen, “Remarks on products of generalized topologies,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 124, pp.

363–369, 2009.

25 T. Noiri and V. Popa, “Almost weakly continuous multifunctions,” Demonstratio Mathematica, vol. 26,

no. 2, pp. 363–380, 1993.

26 M. S. Sarsak, “Weak separation axioms in generalized topological spaces,” Acta Mathematica

(18)

Submit your manuscripts at

http://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematics

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

Differential Equations

International Journal of

Volume 2014

Applied MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in

Complex Analysis

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Optimization

Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Combinatorics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Function Spaces

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

The Scientific

World Journal

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Discrete Mathematics

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Stochastic Analysis

References

Related documents

We propose the Probabilistic Sentential De- cision Diagram (PSDD): A complete and canonical representation of probability dis- tributions defined over the models of a

Interdisciplinary Team Approach in Fall Prevention: Physician Perspective Focus..

11 2/18/16 1130 no 2 no 3 Assess falls status daily, establish toileting routine, falls precautions, keep bedside area dry ad clutter free, room close to nx station unknown

Social network apps: 56% of all smartphone users, strong female bias, higher among 15-24, higher for iPhone & HTC. Map/travel apps: 41% of all smartphone users, stronger

Conclusion – Zaključak In the present study, the crown biomass of Lebanon oak was estimated at the stand level, and the allometric relationships were presented at the tree level

(2009), a binary variable is used showing whether the company has acquired any external R&D services between 2005 and 2007 as a measure of organizing R&D activities ( rd_ex

A study by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network [15] found no signi fi cant association between self-reported PSI 1 month