• No results found

Higher Education Enrollment Marketing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Higher Education Enrollment Marketing"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

How Custom Geo-Targeting Can Produce Efficiencies

Higher Education

Enrollment Marketing

THE IMPACT OF DISTANCE ON INQUIRY GENERATION CAMPAIGNS:

(2)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 2

Contents

Summary... 3

Targeting Students... 3

Inquiry and Conversion Patterns... 4

Inquiry Volume ... 4 Conversion Volume ... 4 Conversion Rate ... 5 Cost Scenarios... 7 Birmingham ... 7 Austin ... 8 Philadelphia ... 9 Geo-Targeting Impact... 10 Conclusion... 10

(3)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 3

Summary

Geographically, every market is different. Cities and their surrounding areas vary by population, demographics and transportation. A successful geo-targeting approach for one location cannot always be replicated to a second location with equal success. To be effective, higher education marketing initiatives must be tailored specifically to the market of each campus location. A custom geo-targeting approach can optimize conversions, conversion rate and cost per conversion.

An analysis of eight United States markets1 reveals patterns of decreasing inquiry volume, conversion

volume and conversion rates at increasing distances from campus locations. Markets with relatively large populations, such as Philadelphia and Chicago, tend to have a higher concentration of inquiries and conversions in close proximity to campus locations than smaller markets, such as Columbia, SC, and Birmingham, AL.

However, exceptions to these patterns are common. Individual analyses of each market reveal geographic areas to include or exclude for optimal conversion-based results. Custom geo-targeting strategies help schools enhance conversion performance and optimize marketing spend.

Where Do I Target Potential Students?

The goal of finding students to enroll at an institution seems simple. However, achieving this goal can be quite complicated and costly. Expensive marketing plans are worthless if you are not reaching the appropriate audience.

A standard geographic approach of marketing campus-based schools is to target potential students within a given distance from the school location. It’s common and simple to set up, but might not always be the best way to achieve your marketing goals.

Our geographic analysis of inquiries, conversions and cost, indicates that this approach is not always the answer. We examined eight markets using data from Sparkroom Marketing Software2. The study includes 2012 affiliate marketing data from a variety of schools, focusing on four variables in relation to distance from campus: inquiry volume, conversion volume, conversion rate and cost per conversion. Each market analysis includes marketing data from at least three colleges.

Inquiry and Conversion Patterns

The eight markets in the analysis show common trends in the relationships between distance and inquiry volume, conversion volume and conversion rate.

Inquiry Volume

The red line on Chart 1 illustrates the average percent of total inquiries by distance from campus. Across the eight markets, 83% of inquiries came from within 20 miles of campus locations. Chicago at 90% and Philadelphia at 94%, have the highest concentration of inquiries within 20 miles from campus. These are the two most populated markets in the study.

1. Birmingham, AL; Chicago, IL; Cincinnati, OH; Columbia, SC; Philadelphia, PA; Salt Lake City, UT;

Nashville, TN; Austin, TX

2. The data in this analysis is comprised of inquiries from external affiliate channels processed by Sparkroom

Marketing Software during 2012. Because school demand plays a factor in inquiry generation, there is the potential for related bias within the report findings.

(4)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 4

Conversion Volume

With 84% of conversion volume located within 20 miles of campuses in the eight markets, conversions are slightly more concentrated than inquiries. Again, Philadelphia and Chicago top the volume within the 20-mile category with 98% and 94% of conversions, respectively. A 20-mile radius would work well in these markets, because almost all conversion volume is within 20 miles of campus locations. But schools can still do better with a custom plan. All eight markets have a greater share of conversions within 20 miles than inquiries. A look at conversion rates explains why.

Percent of Inquiries by Distance from Campus

P

er

cent of T

otal Inquiries

Distance from Campus

70.00% 60.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 40.00% 50.00% 30.00% 60+ Miles 50-60 Miles 40-50 Miles 30-40 Miles 20-30 Miles 10-20 Miles 0-10 Miles 9.53% Birmingham Chicago Cincinnati Columbia Philadelphia Salt Lake City Nashville Austin Average

Though the degree of inquiry concentration varies across markets, the trend of decreasing inquiry volume at increasing distance from campus is clear and consistent for all eight locations. Conversion volume follows a similar pattern.

Chart 1

Birmingham Chicago Cincinnati Columbia Philadelphia Salt Lake City Nashville Austin Average

Percent of Conversions by Distance from Campus

P er cent of T otal C on versions

Distance from Campus

80.00% 70.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 50.00% 60.00% 40.00% 60+ Miles 50-60 Miles 40-50 Miles 30-40 Miles 20-30 Miles 10-20 Miles 0-10 Miles 9.53%

Chart 2

(5)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 5

Conversion Rate

As is the case for inquiry and conversion volume, conversion rates generally decrease as distance from campus increases. The red line on Chart 3 highlights this trend. Conversion rate decreases at an average of 20% from one distance category to the next, up to the 40-50 mile category.

The relationship between conversion rate and distance is not nearly as consistent across markets as the two volume relationships. Rates differ dramatically by location and, in most cases, do not gradually decrease. The individual market lines on Chart 3 bounce up and down across distance categories, in contrast to the linear average line. Distance is not the only factor of conversion rates, nor is it the only geographic factor. Variables such as population density, transportation infrastructure and demographic factors impact conversion rates. Deeper analyses of inquiry performance shown on the following pages support the need for a custom geo-targeting approach.

3. Conversion rates are adjusted to same scale (average rate = .027)

Birmingham Chicago Cincinnati Columbia Philadelphia Salt Lake City Nashville Austin Average Conversion Rate by Distance from Campus

A djus ted C on version Ra te 3

Distance from Campus

0.04 0.035 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0.025 0.03 0.02 60+ Miles 50-60 Miles 40-50 Miles 30-40 Miles 20-30 Miles 10-20 Miles 0-10 Miles 9.53%

Chart 3

(6)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 6

Map 1 and Map 2 show the inquiry and conversion distributions of Chicago and Austin. The red zip codes of the maps indicate high inquiry volume, yellow and blue areas indicate low volume and the purple dots represent conversions. Chicago’s inquiry and conversion volume is clustered near the city center. The far less populated Austin exhibits relatively high inquiry volume and some conversions stretching to the northern and southern edges of the 60-mile radius.

The inquiry and conversion distribution in Austin differs by direction as distance increases. Thus, a marketing plan targeting a set distance radius is inefficient. For example, the area 55 miles north of Austin has high inquiry and conversion volume. Meanwhile, 55 miles east of the city lacks inquiries and conversions. Such geographic nuances are common. Therefore, individual market analyses are essential to establish

geo-targeting for marketing campaigns.

Map 3 and Map 4 display the inquiry and conversion distributions in Columbia and Cincinnati. Though the volume distribution in these markets is not as deviant as that of the Austin market, patterns that could impact marketing plans are present. In Columbia, most of the conversion volume, represented by purple dots, is just north of the city. There are conversions extending from the city on highways to the north, northeast and southeast, but there are no conversions beyond 20 miles southwest of the city down Interstate 20. In Cincinnati, the most concentrated area of inquiry and conversion volume is inside and just north of the city. However, inquiries and conversions spread farther south than they do north, east or west.

Again, a set distance radius that assumes volume changes the same in every direction would be an inefficient geo-targeting strategy in Columbia and Cincinnati.

4. Maps display a 60-mile radius

Chicago: 2012 Inquiry Heat Map with Applications Austin: 2012 Inquiry Heat Map with Applications

Map 14 Map 24

Columbia: 2012 Inquiry Heat Map with Enrollments Cincinnati: 2012 Inquiry Heat Map with Enrollments

(7)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 7

Cost Scenarios

The following examples show how a custom geographic targeting plan optimizes cost and conversion performance. Note that markets vary between three conversion metrics: applications, enrollments and starts. The metric analyzed in each market was chosen based on availability of data, as schools differ in the measures they use and record for conversion evaluation.

Each cost analysis shows a radius scenario, two custom geography options and a chart detailing how the potential geo-targeting changes would affect inquiry volume, conversion volume, conversion rate and cost per conversion. The Custom Geography 1 option for each market is hand-selected to eliminate areas with no conversions but keeps inquiry volume cuts to a minimum. The Custom Geography 2 option makes more liberal volume cuts by rejecting all zip codes below a certain conversion rate threshold and, as a result, has a greater positive impact on conversion rate and a greater reduction in cost per conversion than Custom Geography 1.

An analysis of the Birmingham market yields an average start rate of 1.61% and an average cost per start of $2,448.58. Chart 4 provides three geo-targeting options that improve these two metrics. The percentages on the right of each measure represent the change between the given scenario and all data. For example, limiting the geo-targeting to a 30-Mile Radius reduces start volume by 14% but increases start rate by 17%. Each potential geography scenario decreases inquiry and start volume, but increases start rate and decreases cost per start. Custom Geography 1, illustrated on Map 6, is the most conservative option. Start volume decreases by only 2%, while start rate increases by 6% and cost per start sees a $150 reduction. The 30-Mile Radius and Custom Geography 2 result in greater decreases in inquiry and conversion volume. They also have more significant improvement on start rate and cost than Custom Geography 1 does.

5. Only includes zip codes with a 1.5% start rate or greater

GEOGRAPHY INQUIRIES STARTS START RATE COST PER START

All Data 24800 - 400 - 1.61% - $2,448.58

-30-Mile Radius 18165 -27% 344 -14% 1.89% 17% $2,088.58 -15%

Custom Geography 1 22826 -8% 392 -2% 1.72% 6% $2,295.54 -6%

Custom Geography 2 13549 -45% 327 -18% 2.41% 50% $1,648.85 -33%

Chart 4

All Data: 30-Mile Radius Custom Geography 1 Custom Geography 25

Map 5

Birmingham

(8)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 8

Austin has the most dispersed distribution of inquiries and conversions of any market in the study, as illustrated on Map 8. The 45-Mile Radius has a higher application rate and lower cost per application than the 30-Mile Radius. The unusual pattern is due to high converting, high volume areas more than 30 miles south and more than 50 miles north of the city. The custom geography options include the far-away strong performing hot spots and, unlike the 45-Mile Radius, cut out the areas to the northeast, southeast, west and northwest that do not perform well. Notice that Custom Geography 2 cuts out half as much application volume as the 45-Mile Radius while having a greater positive impact on application rate and cost per application.

7. Only includes zip codes with a 1.5% application rate or greater

All Data: 45 & 30-Mile Radius Custom Geography 1 Custom Geography 27

Map 8

Austin

Map 9 Map 10

GEOGRAPHY INQUIRIES APPLICATIONS APPLICATION RATE APPLICATIONCOST PER

All Data 27685 - 747 - 2.70% - $1,462.48 -45-Mile Radius 21196 -23% 657 -12% 3.10% 15% $1,251.58 -14% 30-Mile Radius 18760 -32% 572 -23% 3.05% 13% $1,270.32 -13% Custom Geography 1 26076 -6% 736 -1% 2.82% 5% $1,395.17 -5% Custom Geography 2 21953 -21% 704 -6% 3.21% 19% $1,224.07 -16%

Chart 5

(9)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 9

Map 11 shows the high concentration of inquiries and enrollments in Philadelphia. The 35-Mile Radius reduces enrollment volume by only 1%. Compared to the radius, Custom Geography 1 eliminates only one additional percent of enrollments, with a 6% greater increase in enrollment rate and 5% greater decrease in cost per enrollment. Philadelphia is an example of a market where strategic geo-targeting can create significant improvements on rate and cost without large volume cuts. Let’s assume a school uses Custom Geography 1 and replaces the 11% of lost inquiry volume with inquiries from the new geography. Based on the model, the 5,234 inquiries will convert at 1.38%. With the same spend as all data, Custom Geography 1 results in 58 more enrollments (72 new enrollments minus 14 enrollments cut out by the new geography).

7. Only includes zip codes with a 1% enrollment rate or greater

All Data: 35-Mile Radius Custom Geography 1 Custom Geography 27

Map 11

Philadelphia

Map 12 Map 13

GEOGRAPHY INQUIRIES ENROLLMENTS ENROLLMENT RATE ENROLLMENTCOST PER

All Data 49787 - 629 - 1.26% - $3,067.21

-35-Mile Radius 47734 -4% 624 -1% 1.31% 3% $2,978.87 -3%

Custom Geography 1 44553 -11% 615 -2% 1.38% 9% $2,818.79 -8%

Custom Geography 2 36186 -27% 574 -9% 1.59% 26% $2,447.16 -20%

(10)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 10

The Impact of Geo-Targeting

Analyses of Birmingham, Philadelphia and Austin display key geographic differences that impact

marketing plans and illuminate the need to treat each location individually. Each cost scenario shows how geo-targeting improves conversion rates. For some schools, higher conversion rates and lower costs per conversion may outweigh lost conversion volume. However, the cost charts displaying reduced inquiry and conversion totals do not factor in new volume that could replace inquiries rejected by geo-targeting. A school that regularly hits caps or can draw from new sources will likely be able to replace volume lost in geo-cuts with better performing inquiries from higher converting areas. If a school is able to compensate for most or all lost volume when employing strategic geo-targeting, it can not only raise conversion rate and decrease cost per conversion, but increase conversions as well.

In the previous example of Philadelphia’s Custom Geography 1, strategic geo-targeting—under the assumption that all inquiry volume is replaced—creates an 11% increase in conversions. Even if only half of the cut volume is filled, a school would see a 3.5% increase in conversions with a lower total cost and cost per conversion.

Conclusion

While common geographic patterns of enrollment marketing performance exist, differences that significantly impact campaign success are common. Strategic geo-targeting is an essential tool to optimize conversions and cost. To create geo-targeting plans for individual campuses, a strong collection of data and a tool or service to analyze the data are required. Sparkroom can provide both. Geographic evaluation is a simple way to boost performance in higher education enrollment marketing campaigns. By evaluating each school location on an individual basis, schools can optimize marketing strategies. The Marketing Analytics team at Sparkroom uses a cutting edge geographic information system (GIS) to analyze marketing performance and generate custom geo-targeting initiatives. Sparkroom Marketing Services leverages the powerful Sparkroom Marketing Software database and its expertise in strategic geographic marketing can help schools surpass enrollment goals and efficiently spend marketing dollars

(11)

A Custom Geo-Targeting Approach 11

About Sparkroom

Sparkroom is the leader in performance marketing for the higher education industry. We provide fully transparent, analytics-based strategies that are designed to do one thing—achieve your enrollment marketing objectives.

Sparkroom knows what it takes to attract the right students to your brand while managing recruitment costs. Our superior combination of Marketing Services and industry-leading Marketing Software gives schools a competitive advantage, allowing for improved efficiency, higher quality and better conversion rates.

Sparkroom Marketing Analytics provides a deep look at how inquiries are performing to allow schools

to better understand and optimize their enrollment campaigns while making smarter, performance-based decisions.

Sparkroom Marketing Software processes more than one million inquiries each month. Sparkroom

Marketing Software is cloud-based and helps marketers grow enrollments while controlling the cost of student acquisition. Sparkroom Marketing Software integrates marketing data, automates marketing processes and provides marketing analytics that drive smarter decisions and a more optimized budget.

3/2014, 6/2014

The Power of

Sparkroom

Contact your Sparkroom account executive or email sales@sparkroom.com for more information.

References

Related documents

Legal Intern , General Counsel’s Office January 2010 – April 2010 Conducted legal research and drafted memoranda on litigation, employment, and contract issues.. Presented

Managing Application Development – Results for CIOs/IT Executives and Large Company Respondents Managing Application Development CIOs/IT Executives YOY Trend (Priority Level)

Trayvon Martin died prematurely when he was shot by George Zimmerman last year. The untimely death of an innocent Black teenager and the Sanford Police Department’s failure to

However, the case can be made that, in fact, the best sce- nario is one of integration, one in which we find ourselves able to incorporate insights from both science fiction and

FWTCO will also provide one SNCOIC or officer aboard Edson Range and in the training area during all FWTCO sponsored events to act as a direct liaison to the recruit training

Ideal for performance marketers focused on driving enrollment growth through online channels, including cost per thousand (CPM), cost per click (CPC) and cost per lead

partially varies with the changes in the level of quantity (activity) e.g: telephone costs; fixed line rental plus costs for. the calls 7 Cos t 0 20 40 60 80 100 200

Activity (Sales units) Sales revenue/Costs Tota l cos ts Variable costs Fixed costs Profit Loss Profit S al es Fixed costs Break-even point... By Group – Contribution Graph 0