• No results found

Site Summit Tower Foundation Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Site Summit Tower Foundation Report"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Site Summit Tower

Foundation Report

For:

Blaine Sears

Project Manager, PTC, Telecom

By:

Andrew P. Adams, PE

Consulting Engineer

(2)

♦PO BOX 876303 ♦ Wasilla, AK 99687 ♦ 573-586-8735 ♦ andrewpadams@gci.net

July 17, 2015 Blaine Sears

Project Manager, PTC, Telecom 825 Whitney Rd

Anchorage, AK 99501 Mr. Sears:

Andrew P. Adams, PE Consulting Engineer is pleased to provide the structural analysis for the

existing tower foundation located at Site Summit, Alaska. Analysis for this project is based on

information from the original tower design drawings provided by the Alaska Railroad.

The original drawings are provided in an appendix to this report. The goal of this analysis is to

determine the suitability of the existing foundation to support a like-kind tower replacement. The

tower loading will be based on the following requirements.

Original Tower Equipment Summary

Type

Size

Area

Elevation

Dish

10’

78.5 sf

50’

Dish

8’

50.24 sf

50’

Dish

10’

78.5 sf

40’

Dish

6’

28.25 sf

40’

Dish

6’

28.25 sf

30’

Summary of Results:

Provisions in the International Existing Building Code 2009, which is currently is the governing state code for existing structures, allows for structural modifications without detailed soil and foundation analysis if certain limits are met. Per IEBC section 3403.3, there is a gravity load increase allowance of 5% and per IEBC section 3403.4, there is a lateral load increase allowance of 10% before modifications are required. However, the original tower design was based on the EIA-222-E, and the current code standards is TIA-222-G. Because of this code change, and additional load parameters requested by the AKRR, the following configuration permits the maximum allowable loading for the existing foundation. Minimum Wind Speed: 125 MPH no ice

60 MPH ½” ice

Proposed Equipment Configuration

Type

Size

Area

Elevation

Dish

8’

50.24 sf

40’

Dish

6’

50.24 sf

40’

Dish

6’

28.25 sf

30’

(3)

Foundation Reaction Comparison

Max Axial**

Max Shear

Max

Moment

Original Design

13.4 kips

35.6 kips

1373 kip-ft

Proposed Design

10.8 kips

37 kips

1181 kip-ft

Percent Change

-22.4%

+4%

-14%

**The change in foundation reactions assumes the new tower will not have walking platforms. The tower vendor may provide additional limitations to the loading based on the tower’s component capacity.

Recommendations:

The results of the analysis show no modifications are required to the existing foundation. However, due to some damage to the foundation anchorage, the tower foundation shall be repaired as shown on the provided drawings.

Respectfully,

Andrew P. Adams, P.E.

(4)

♦PO BOX 876303 ♦ Wasilla, AK 99687 ♦ 573-586-8735 ♦ andrewpadams@gci.net

(5)

40.0 ft 30.0 ft 20.0 ft 10.0 ft 0.0 ft REACTIONS - 125 mph WIND 37065 lb SHEAR 1181357 lb-ftMOMENT 6624 lb AXIAL 60 mph WIND - 0.2500 in ICE 6871 lb SHEAR 212160 lb-ft MOMENT 10816 lb AXIAL SHEAR: 12293 lb UPLIFT: -74698 lb SHEAR: 12572 lb DOWN: 77597 lb

MAX. CORNER REACTIONS AT BASE: ARE FACTORED ALL REACTIONS Section T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 Legs HSS4.5x.237 HSS5.563x.258 Leg Grade A572-50 Diagonals HSS1.9x.145 Diagonal Grade A572-50 Top Girts 2L2x2x1/8 N.A. Sec. Horizontals 2L2x2x1/8 Face Width (ft) 10 11 # Panels @ (ft) 5 @ 10 Weight (lb) 913.7 913.7 913.7 954.9 982.4 4678.4

DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING

TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION

8 FT DISH 40 6 FT DISH 40 6 FT DISH 30 6 FT DISH 30 MATERIAL STRENGTH GRADE Fy Fu GRADE Fy Fu

A572-50 50 ksi 65 ksi

TOWER DESIGN NOTES

1. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard.

2. Tower designed for a 125 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard. 3. Tower is also designed for a 60 mph basic wind with 0.25 in ice. Ice is considered to increase

in thickness with height.

4. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. 5. Tower Structure Class II.

6. Topographic Category 2 with Crest Height of 1500.00 ft 7. Weld together tower sections have flange connections.

8. Connections use galvanized A325 bolts, nuts and locking devices. Installation per TIA/EIA-222 and AISC Specifications.

9. Tower members are "hot dipped" galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 and ASTM A153 Standards.

(6)

♦PO BOX 876303 ♦ Wasilla, AK 99687 ♦ 573-586-8735 ♦ andrewpadams@gci.net

(7)

Andrew P. Adams No. SE13603 3/4" = 1'-0" 3/4" = 1'-0" NTS 7/21/15

References

Related documents

On the expiry date if the Member has an open position, it is the difference between the final settlement price and the previous day’s settlement pricea.

After looking at the scores of each group, the first research question, concerning kindergarten screenings ability to predict kindergarten academic success can be answered in

Jaya Bhava is Vayu Tattwa, Kama Kona – Shukra fits in here best.. Sukha Bhava is Jala Tattwa, Moksha Kona – Chandra fits in

Тип ресурсу Призначення Алфавітний підхід Статистичний підхід Семантичний підхід Файлова система Персональний ресурс Автоматично Не застосовується

The emotion caused by what for a moment seemed almost a diplomatic incident was diverted by the appearance of two Chinese servants in long silk robes and four-sided hats

All stationary perfect equilibria of the intertemporal game approach (as slight stochastic perturbations as in Nash (1953) tend to zero) the same division of surplus as the static

The seed oils studied have saponification values between the ranges 56.00 – 176.72 with Parkia biglobosa seed oil having the higher mean saponification value (175.32) and

We have shown that in the selected study districts of four Ethiopian regions there was geographical clustering in the utilization of facility-based delivery and in the coverage of